Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Another egregious lie and manipulation from #MeghanMarkle-this time, about her niece being invited to the wedding. Markle claims that “guidance” was to not invite Ashleigh because they weren’t inviting Samantha-but by all means, invite complete strangers she’s never met like the Clooneys & Oprah? Harry can invite his ex...

184,954 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfĂźgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Here’s the clip from the #HarryandMeghan Oprah shitshow where #MeghanMarkle disparages the #PrincessofWales while repeatedly saying she’s not disparaging her. Markle’s main point is that SHE cried and she did NOT make Catherine cry. How does she know? How does she know she didn’t? She doesn’t. There’s a reason you NEVER hear about the Princess being rude to people or having issues with staff or family-because she doesn’t. #PrincessCatherine is very measured and careful in how she treats others while you hear nothing about Markle than her issues with people, conflict, Markle-ing them, and bullying. So what’s the likely scenario? Markle has countless estrangements, Catherine has none. Markle essentially says that because of the conflict (there’s that word again) with her father before the wedding, apparently everyone should have been kissing her ass and allowing any kind of disrespectful behavior because of a situation she and Harry caused with Thomas Markle. This was Meghan Markle’s SECOND wedding yet she’s acting like she’s brand new at it. She’s visibly angry that the Palace didn’t get into the mud with the press about the crying story-she should be GRATEFUL because it wouldn’t have been flattering to her. She and Harry wanted the Palace to fight every single story that they didn’t like & that’s not how it works-that’s how you give negativity life. But catering to her ego is priority. #MeghanMarkleIsAMeanGirl #MeghanMarkleIsABully #MeghanIsTheProblem

Princess CarParkle 👑

118,363 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Queen Esther

149,986 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

One thing #MeghanMarkle has consistently shown is that she’s incapable of directly answering a question. Oprah asks her if leaving was the plan all along. Instead of answering it, she goes on about how she “left my career”-Rachel Zane was being written out of the show before Harry was in the picture. This “career” was waning which is why she was so desperate for Harry to publicly announce they were dating. She wrote the family letters they probably couldn’t read because her handwriting is illegible. We know, however, that they did NOT leave with “no plan”. She was in talks with Oprah as early as 2018. In early 2019, they were negotiating with Quibi, then moved on to Netflix where they eventually signed in Sep 2020. Spotify was a few months later-but these contracts take MONTHS to negotiate and finalize, so they were absolutely in talks before they announced they were leaving. No one can convince me they didn’t plan every step. Going to Canada before they went to the US? Planned. Idk if Harry or Archie had to wait for immigration/passport issues but Canada was planned. So was LA. This is when she starts complaining that nobody made sure she knew “God Save the Queen” and nobody gave her Royal lessons-why didn’t her huzzband Aitch make sure she knew the anthem? It’s not that hard, btw-for the US people it’s the same tune as “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” and I’d think memorizing lines would come easy to the actor. The Queen gave her Samantha Cohen, but Markle knew everything and didn’t need her help. #MeghanMarkleExposed #HarryandMeghan

Princess CarParkle 👑

59,427 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.

Queen Esther

110,252 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten