Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Another Maricopa County refresher for everyone! And this is NOT a problem restricted to only Maricopa County or to only Arizona. Mail Ballots are fundamentally FLAWED because by the time it arrives to the county, there is NO WAY for anyone there to know who filled out the ballot,...

53,423 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

MARICOPA ELECTION TRAINING TAPES EMERGE: Maricopa County Election Trainers Admit Poll Workers Cannot Stop Third Party Ballot Harvesting: "It's Not Our Job to Police That." OMG Citizen Journalists are on the inside recording Maricopa County Election Trainings. "We're not any type of law enforcement," said Maricopa County Election Trainer Amy Bricker when undercover O’Keefe Media Group (O’Keefe Media Group) journalists questioned how poll workers should respond to ballot harvesting during election training. When asked if poll workers can call out illegal activity, Bricker stated, "No, you cannot." During the training, one OMG citizen journalist raised concerns: "We had a couple instances during the primary where someone brought in a stack [of ballots]. My question is, are we allowed to say anything?" Bricker’s response was clear: "As long as the ballot is signed and dated, we don’t get involved." Election trainers confirmed that even if ballots are harvested illegally, "If it's signed by the owners, it's valid," raising serious questions about the integrity of the voting process. Additionally, OMG citizen journalists discovered that the Department of Justice (DOJ) federal agents will be stationed inside polling centers across Maricopa County. When questioned why, Bricker responded, "They could be following up on a lawsuit or monitoring things for this election." Maricopa County Maricopa County Elections Maricopa County Recorder's Office Stephen Richer

James O'Keefe

4,916,288 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is the FIX in ARIZONA ELECTIONS. Penske trucks full of ballots were followed to Runbeck Election Services with no observers or chain of custody. When an election audit company tried to get Runbeck's records and videos to prove chain of custody, observers, and voter roll information, an Arizona judged denied the request. Why wouldn't Runbeck just turn it over to prove their case in the first place? Another red flag is when Arizona state election officials were asked about the Penske trucks they said something completely different and that they were moving equipment and chairs, never mentioning Runbeck or what they do or ballots. There is something a lot bigger transpiring here, and it goes all the way to the top of Arizona's government. The Arizona Sheriff is said to have even been installed, not elected, by a well funded Soros-funded campaign as well. Runbeck has contracts with Dominion, ES&S, and other election involved companies. They print, mark, scan, transport, and verify ballots. The problem is that there is no chain of custody or observers. Hundreds of thousands of ballots are alleged to be fraudulent, the paper is different, the marks are all the same, along with many other indications found by data scientist and election audit specialists. If Runbeck is the one scanning and verifying the ballots authenticity and signatures, etc., before they go to the county to be counted, then this means they are letting fraudulent ballots through to be counted, especially if there is no chain of custody or observers, anyone could add thousands of inauthentic ballots anywhere within the process or Runbeck is directly involved themselves.

The SCIF

34,007 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

“They cannot believe this result, say that the only way that this could be true is if it was fraud and cheating.” Actually no, it’s not that “the only way Spencer Pratt could lose is if there was fraud and cheating.” At least not for me and for most people I’ve spoken to or seen speaking. And I understand that had he advanced to the general, Pratt would’ve had an uphill battle and a hell of a long shot in front of him. The issue isn’t “it must be fraud;” the issue is that in California and these progressive-run states and cities, we’ve built an electoral system that begs the public to mistrust it—not because we lose but because it’s not as secure as it could be; it is objectively left open to vulnerabilities, and we can only assume this is purposeful and willful. An election that requires no photo ID to prove you are who you say you are is open to fraud. A bad actor needs only your name and address, and they could cast a vote in person in your stead, and you wouldn’t know until your vote got rejected and you had to cast a provisional ballot. There’s no security against that. Again, if a person knows your name and address, they can vote for you. No other info is given at the vote center. And since Covid, we mass mail out ballots to every single voter—even to people who don’t want them. I see ballots everywhere, discarded on apartment complex mailboxes because they belong to someone who no longer lives there. I’ve received ballots that aren’t mine. I’ve had my ballot sent to an address that’s not mine. And I can’t request to not have a ballot sent to me. It’s forced on me—even if I vote in person. And universal mail-in ballots present another very easy way a person could vote on your behalf—and again, you wouldn’t know until you tried to vote, got rejected, and had to fill out a provisional ballot. Yes, your ballot showing up at your door is super convenient; it also opens the door to fraud. And a mere 7 years ago, we didn’t do it like this, and still people who wanted or needed to vote by mail could do it; they just had to request it. And under that system, nobody screamed “voter suppression” or “disenfranchisement,” but now we do—not because it’s actually voter suppression but because we’ve gotten used to the convenience. And why are we allowing for ballot harvesting? Why should it be legal for you to collect ballots en masse from people you don’t know and aren’t related to? Again, that opens the door to fraud, tampering, and undue influence. And why do we accept mail-in ballots that arrive seven days post election? California gives you so many avenues and so much time (a full month) to return your ballot that you should be able to get your ballot to its final destination by election night—not just in the mail but to its final destination. This is called…being an adult and mailing things on time. Not voter suppression. It’s not a matter of opinion that all of the above opens our elections to more fraud and general mistrust; it’s a matter of fact. We’re trading security for convenience. That trade-off might be worth it to Democrats, but it shouldn’t be, and it’s not worth it to all of us. A country cannot stand if nearly half or half or more than half of the populace doesn’t trust the election process. That’s not a Republican issue or a MAGA issue; that’s a United States of America issue. So no, it’s not about “my guy wins or it’s fraud.” It’s about objectively we’re leaving our elections vulnerable to fraudulent activity. We’re the greatest nation in the world, and yet other countries have more secure (and also quicker) electoral processes. That’s unacceptable. None of the above would put undue burden on a voter—and yet all of it would help secure the voter and fortify against fraud.

Natalie Jean Beisner

25,694 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Michigan Democrats are terrified Biden will implode and drag them down. So today they bet the bank and went all out to codify election fraud into state statute with SB 603. Today they smashed through this gigantic pile of election-fraud-enabling legislation today with Democrat only votes. SB603 Repeals current law that gives authority to bipartisan county Boards of Canvassers to investigate fraud and other wrongdoing including ballot tampering during recounts. With the passage of their (election-fraud-enabling) Bill, there will be no future route for requesting a recount if you believe there was fraud. Under their corruption bill, candidates will be prohibited from requesting a recount if they suspect fraud and is designed to stop investigations of election fraud by the Board of Canvassers. This disgusting bill will now permit clerks to recount ballots even if seals are broken on ballot containers and was essentially written by the Secretary of State who was reversed multiple times, by our Supreme Court for her illegal election decisions. The bill changes the standard for a candidate or party to petition for a recount of election results from alleging there has been “mistake or fraud” in the process to now only permitting alleging there has been an “error.” So even if the candidate or Party is absolutely convinced there was fraud, this cannot be alleged or investigated. To boot, this Democrat’s bill makes it tougher to do a recount by doubling the recount petition fees and making it a felony for 'interfering' with a recount without any clear definition of what that means to open up more “LAWFARE.” If passed as is, the language is changed to prohibit a recount, investigation or audit of the conduct of an election when fraud is alleged to only a determination of the number of votes cast for one candidate or another, or a ballot question. Lastly, the bill says a recount could not assess the qualification of the voters participating in an election, or the manner in which ballots are applied for, or issued to voters. Wow isn’t that a doozy. If illegals, or dead people, or those not registered in Mich. are voting, we cannot “assess the qualification of those voters or the manner in which those ballots were applied for and issued to these voters.” Yep, the Democrats have completely thrown off the mask with this terrible bill attempting to win at any cost-our Republic... be damned.

Jim Runestad

126,305 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren