Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

❄️ ANTARCTICA ❄️ Richard E. Byrd led the largest-ever military expedition to Antarctica. The mission was called Operation Highjump ✖️13 ships ✖️33 aircraft ✖️4,700+ military personnel It was scheduled to last 6 months, but was cut short after just 8 weeks. Whistleblowers say they encountered something. Byrd reported witnessing... flying discs emerging from the water and ice at incredible speeds, unlike anything humanity possessed. Byrd said “The United States must take protective measures against enemy aircraft flying over one or both poles… They can fly from pole to pole at incredible speeds.” The region became locked down tighter than anywhere else on Earth & Byrd was silenced as many others on the expedition were. Then he died, his son found his journal & released the contents then he died as did many that spoke about what they had witnessed. Satellite imagery of Antarctica is heavily censored, with key areas blurred or replaced. But some images have been taken before areas were covered. So many cultures share similar stories of the ancient world which we are told is myth, what if it’s not all myth? What do you think? What other ‘myths’ could be possible? I love all things weird & wonderful 💫show more

Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏

139,807 subscribers

13,350 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

ADMIRAL RICHARD E. BYRD, ANTARCTICA AND THE HIDDEN WORLD BEYOND THE ICE Richard E. Byrd was a Freemason who founded his own lodge in Antarctica. Byrd is famous for his expeditions to Antarctica. Admiral Byrd participated in a mission to Antarctica called, “Operation Deep Freeze 1” (1955–1956), it was during this time that the United States set up permanent bases there. Three years after this expedition, The Antarctic Treaty (1959) is created and agreed upon by 12 countries which today is 52. The treaty makes it illegal for anyone to travel to Antarctica. Yes you can take a cruise to Antarctica but you will never be able to explore the area on your own. "He was a highly decorated service member achieving the Medal of Honor and loved expeditions and exploration. This drive sent him to Antarctica numerous times, but the one expedition of interest is “Operation HighJump” (1946–1947). For this mission he was supported by the US Navy, giving him plenty of ships, boats, aircraft, and personnel to complete the operation. He found the unexpected. We have been lied to about what is in Antarctica. Here are a few quotes from the interview “Strangely enough, there is an area left in the world today an area as big as the United States that’s never been seen by a human being.” “It’s an untouched reservoir of natural resources”. Why is there a Rothschilds Island in Antarctica? What don't we know what really goes on there? Are there vast expenses of land to explore? Do you believe because we drew it on a globe that it's conclusive? Do you believe the official narrative? Why do we have thousands of maps showing different land all throughout history? They have sold you a pack of lies and you believe it without question. The world you live in may be much bigger and much more different than you could ever imagine. They need you to think it is small to push the overpopulation hoax in accordance with Agenda 21 and the control of you and all resources. Ask yourself, is it easier to control a people when you have them trapped in a small space? Question everything frens.

ADMIRAL RICHARD E. BYRD, ANTARCTICA AND THE HIDDEN WORLD BEYOND THE ICE Richard E. Byrd was a Freemason who founded his own lodge in Antarctica. Byrd is famous for his expeditions to Antarctica. Admiral Byrd participated in a mission to Antarctica called, “Operation Deep Freeze 1” (1955–1956), it was during this time that the United States set up permanent bases there. Three years after this expedition, The Antarctic Treaty (1959) is created and agreed upon by 12 countries which today is 52. The treaty makes it illegal for anyone to travel to Antarctica. Yes you can take a cruise to Antarctica but you will never be able to explore the area on your own. "He was a highly decorated service member achieving the Medal of Honor and loved expeditions and exploration. This drive sent him to Antarctica numerous times, but the one expedition of interest is “Operation HighJump” (1946–1947). For this mission he was supported by the US Navy, giving him plenty of ships, boats, aircraft, and personnel to complete the operation. He found the unexpected. We have been lied to about what is in Antarctica. Here are a few quotes from the interview “Strangely enough, there is an area left in the world today an area as big as the United States that’s never been seen by a human being.” “It’s an untouched reservoir of natural resources”. Why is there a Rothschilds Island in Antarctica? What don't we know what really goes on there? Are there vast expenses of land to explore? Do you believe because we drew it on a globe that it's conclusive? Do you believe the official narrative? Why do we have thousands of maps showing different land all throughout history? They have sold you a pack of lies and you believe it without question. The world you live in may be much bigger and much more different than you could ever imagine. They need you to think it is small to push the overpopulation hoax in accordance with Agenda 21 and the control of you and all resources. Ask yourself, is it easier to control a people when you have them trapped in a small space? Question everything frens.

Redpill Drifter

31,122 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Devon Larratt just told Joe Rogan that during his Military Days, he and his Team went on a Military Campaign in the Ancient City of Erbil in Iraq, which is one of the most Ancient Cities in all of World History and is historically linked to Ancient Sumer and Ancient Babylon. He said that while they were in Erbil, one of his Comrades, who was in the Military with him, got possessed by a Demon for almost two whole Weeks. According to Devon Larratt, once it happened, he could instantly speak other Languages and psychically knew the deepest secrets of everyone around him, such as their Sins, as well as everything about their Childhoods, along with things that they never told anybody before, where this Ancient Sumerian Demon was apparently trying to mimic the Gifts Of The Holy Spirit. His demonically-possessed Comrade went to several Military Medical Professionals to try to figure out what was wrong with him and they all told him that he needed to see the Military Priest that was touring with them in Iraq and then the Priest performed an Exorcism on him and successfully drove out the Demon. What was even stranger is that the Priest told them that he has dealt with this particular Ancient Demon many times before and has seen multiple people start doing the exact same things that he was doing and perceiving instantly once they were possessed by it just like he did and the Priest wasn’t surprised by any of these things at all once they told him about them. The now formerly-possessed Man still has to check up with his Local Parish atleast once a Week, and, needless to say, he retired from the Military after having that insane experience.

Devon Larratt just told Joe Rogan that during his Military Days, he and his Team went on a Military Campaign in the Ancient City of Erbil in Iraq, which is one of the most Ancient Cities in all of World History and is historically linked to Ancient Sumer and Ancient Babylon. He said that while they were in Erbil, one of his Comrades, who was in the Military with him, got possessed by a Demon for almost two whole Weeks. According to Devon Larratt, once it happened, he could instantly speak other Languages and psychically knew the deepest secrets of everyone around him, such as their Sins, as well as everything about their Childhoods, along with things that they never told anybody before, where this Ancient Sumerian Demon was apparently trying to mimic the Gifts Of The Holy Spirit. His demonically-possessed Comrade went to several Military Medical Professionals to try to figure out what was wrong with him and they all told him that he needed to see the Military Priest that was touring with them in Iraq and then the Priest performed an Exorcism on him and successfully drove out the Demon. What was even stranger is that the Priest told them that he has dealt with this particular Ancient Demon many times before and has seen multiple people start doing the exact same things that he was doing and perceiving instantly once they were possessed by it just like he did and the Priest wasn’t surprised by any of these things at all once they told him about them. The now formerly-possessed Man still has to check up with his Local Parish atleast once a Week, and, needless to say, he retired from the Military after having that insane experience.

Godrules1

534,177 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The Maasai tribe from Africa teaching the world "What is a woman" Matt Walsh travels to Africa to ask local villagers about transgenderism and if their notions of gender are as fluid as in the West. He asks the Maasai Tribe "What is a Woman?". What they tell Matt is different from many of the so called “experts” who couldn't answer the Question "There are things a woman can do that a man cannot, and things men can do that women cannot, hence, we have been created equally but different to ‘supplement’ each other by being what the other is not" ~ Maasai Tribe Elder "if you want to become a lady but you are a man, you have something wrong with you ..." ~ Maasai One of the Maasai Men asked the translator in Maasai language "is this guy insane or what?" They were clearly holding back laughter out of kindness. As soon as Matt left they told all their friends back home and laughed at the outside world. This is the first time in the Documentary Film Matt looks so afraid not to offend people! And as someone from Africa, I can assure you that they were thinking what the hell is wrong with this man is he insane or what? Before the translator could finish the last question, the whole crowd was laughing. It is as if Matt proved to the Maasai tribe that the outside world is crazy. Your comments on this

The Maasai tribe from Africa teaching the world "What is a woman" Matt Walsh travels to Africa to ask local villagers about transgenderism and if their notions of gender are as fluid as in the West. He asks the Maasai Tribe "What is a Woman?". What they tell Matt is different from many of the so called “experts” who couldn't answer the Question "There are things a woman can do that a man cannot, and things men can do that women cannot, hence, we have been created equally but different to ‘supplement’ each other by being what the other is not" ~ Maasai Tribe Elder "if you want to become a lady but you are a man, you have something wrong with you ..." ~ Maasai One of the Maasai Men asked the translator in Maasai language "is this guy insane or what?" They were clearly holding back laughter out of kindness. As soon as Matt left they told all their friends back home and laughed at the outside world. This is the first time in the Documentary Film Matt looks so afraid not to offend people! And as someone from Africa, I can assure you that they were thinking what the hell is wrong with this man is he insane or what? Before the translator could finish the last question, the whole crowd was laughing. It is as if Matt proved to the Maasai tribe that the outside world is crazy. Your comments on this

African Hub

80,770 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

This happened at a gas station while both this man and woman were filling up their vehicles. The man noticed the woman flying the Mexican flag and asked her why she was flying that flag instead of a USA flag. Apparently she didn’t answer and he kept asking her. He told her he was asking nicely to respect “our” country (The USA) and she responded “I want to put MY flag up because I’m proud of being Mexican. I’m sorry that you’re racist…..” Many people had differing opinions. Some said good for her for sticking up for her culture, but others, even some Hispanic people said that the USA is now their country which has afforded them things that they never would have had possible before. That they were proud Mexican/Americans but they only fly the USA flag. I don’t think what he asked was racist. I think many people feel the same way, we are here, the USA is our country, why not be proud of the USA and fly OUR flag. Before you come at me, I have two kids- they are both part Hispanic/Mexican, so you can’t say I don’t like Hispanic or Mexicans. It’s not about that. Do you think this guy said anything racist? Or do you think it was a legitimate question? Would it bother you too? Do you think it’s a free country and she can fly whatever flag she wants? What do you think?

This happened at a gas station while both this man and woman were filling up their vehicles. The man noticed the woman flying the Mexican flag and asked her why she was flying that flag instead of a USA flag. Apparently she didn’t answer and he kept asking her. He told her he was asking nicely to respect “our” country (The USA) and she responded “I want to put MY flag up because I’m proud of being Mexican. I’m sorry that you’re racist…..” Many people had differing opinions. Some said good for her for sticking up for her culture, but others, even some Hispanic people said that the USA is now their country which has afforded them things that they never would have had possible before. That they were proud Mexican/Americans but they only fly the USA flag. I don’t think what he asked was racist. I think many people feel the same way, we are here, the USA is our country, why not be proud of the USA and fly OUR flag. Before you come at me, I have two kids- they are both part Hispanic/Mexican, so you can’t say I don’t like Hispanic or Mexicans. It’s not about that. Do you think this guy said anything racist? Or do you think it was a legitimate question? Would it bother you too? Do you think it’s a free country and she can fly whatever flag she wants? What do you think?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

46,527 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Andrew went to TPUSA and asked for evidence to dispute all the BS Candace and the other minions have been saying for months. He said they were happy to give it to him. He also says he will give everyone evidence that on Friday all this will be dropped. - Erika was not at Ft H. He says the entire Ft H conspiracy will be blown out of the water. Mitch and Stew Peters are screwed. But also if the evidence shows this the Harpole case is a in a great position. - Where Erika was when Charlie died - Charlie wanted Erika to take over - The text - That Candace was after TPUSA almost as soon as Charlie died. I bet it’s texts and emails from Candace wanting to go back to TPUSA and being told no but I could be wrong. And more….. That what he shows will shut down all the conspiracies. This is what Candace is so mad about. She knew when that text was read that Andrew had more than just that. We shall see. I hope it’s iron clad.

Andrew went to TPUSA and asked for evidence to dispute all the BS Candace and the other minions have been saying for months. He said they were happy to give it to him. He also says he will give everyone evidence that on Friday all this will be dropped. - Erika was not at Ft H. He says the entire Ft H conspiracy will be blown out of the water. Mitch and Stew Peters are screwed. But also if the evidence shows this the Harpole case is a in a great position. - Where Erika was when Charlie died - Charlie wanted Erika to take over - The text - That Candace was after TPUSA almost as soon as Charlie died. I bet it’s texts and emails from Candace wanting to go back to TPUSA and being told no but I could be wrong. And more….. That what he shows will shut down all the conspiracies. This is what Candace is so mad about. She knew when that text was read that Andrew had more than just that. We shall see. I hope it’s iron clad.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

36,934 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

What is different about the Lindsay Clancy case? And before you comment “all the inconsistencies with this one” are what make it different, here are all the inconsistencies with Chad’s case.👇🏻 Many said the “Planned for months” versus an apparent religious breakdown was inconsistent No motive was publicly established at sentencing Many said His behavior alternated between calculated and apparently delusional Many believed The mother was involved Many people it could have been the stepdaughter His suiclde comments were contradicting Many said the police framed him Many said the church ordered him to kill them The psychiatric findings were never fully aired publicly Detectives violated his Miranda rights Many said he was demonically possessed Many blamed the drugs Many said it was because of an affair Many said the plea deal was forced to cover up the truth There was no public testing of the evidence. So what’s different about this one? And also, should we go back and re examine cases like Iryna Zerutska or any of the other mass shootings etc etc since all of those people were also mentally unstable? Remember how “white lives matter” followed immediately after “black lives matter”? And then it was “all lives matter”? How many of you were on the “all lives matter” side? Now, watch what happens in the comments. And realize just how calculated this all is.

What is different about the Lindsay Clancy case? And before you comment “all the inconsistencies with this one” are what make it different, here are all the inconsistencies with Chad’s case.👇🏻 Many said the “Planned for months” versus an apparent religious breakdown was inconsistent No motive was publicly established at sentencing Many said His behavior alternated between calculated and apparently delusional Many believed The mother was involved Many people it could have been the stepdaughter His suiclde comments were contradicting Many said the police framed him Many said the church ordered him to kill them The psychiatric findings were never fully aired publicly Detectives violated his Miranda rights Many said he was demonically possessed Many blamed the drugs Many said it was because of an affair Many said the plea deal was forced to cover up the truth There was no public testing of the evidence. So what’s different about this one? And also, should we go back and re examine cases like Iryna Zerutska or any of the other mass shootings etc etc since all of those people were also mentally unstable? Remember how “white lives matter” followed immediately after “black lives matter”? And then it was “all lives matter”? How many of you were on the “all lives matter” side? Now, watch what happens in the comments. And realize just how calculated this all is.

Ian

10,434 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Gracy was down but not out 🙏🥰🐕 This is little Gracy and you’ll struggle to see a more fulfilling comeback. She is a tiny puppy who was about to die but has had the most incredible comeback thanks to the wonderful kind people in Little Paws rescue in Bali. I was with them yesterday and could see the incredible work they were doing with many similar dogs. It gave me such inspiration to visit and see Sabine and her team of animal lovers changing the lives of so many. Dog rescue and everything that comes with it is incredibly mentally challenging and can knock you back on a daily basis but seeing others doing it drives me on. My big vision and mission is to shine the light on others around the world. Bali was a real eye opener as I think the problem might be even worse than Thailand. It felt like it on the ground in terms of sheer numbers. Stories like this one of Gracy and her comeback show what is possible. What incredible people 🥰🙏

Gracy was down but not out 🙏🥰🐕 This is little Gracy and you’ll struggle to see a more fulfilling comeback. She is a tiny puppy who was about to die but has had the most incredible comeback thanks to the wonderful kind people in Little Paws rescue in Bali. I was with them yesterday and could see the incredible work they were doing with many similar dogs. It gave me such inspiration to visit and see Sabine and her team of animal lovers changing the lives of so many. Dog rescue and everything that comes with it is incredibly mentally challenging and can knock you back on a daily basis but seeing others doing it drives me on. My big vision and mission is to shine the light on others around the world. Bali was a real eye opener as I think the problem might be even worse than Thailand. It felt like it on the ground in terms of sheer numbers. Stories like this one of Gracy and her comeback show what is possible. What incredible people 🥰🙏

Niall Harbison

321,602 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Julius Erving talking about playing with Charles Barkley: “I kept seeing his upside. He was hard-headed. He had something to say about everything. If he didn’t play as good as he can and well as he was capable of playing or whatever, then some of the things he did wouldn’t be tolerated. But they were tolerated because, you know, he was exceptional, man. He could rebound it, take it coast to coast, make play. And for his height to rebound the way that he did, it was incredible. It was kind of disruptive because we had won the championship the year before he got there. Then the year that he got there. We had to make room for him and he almost killed Marc Iavaroni cuz he was playing the four, Charles was like that’s my spot right there. This going back to violence in the game because the next man up. Me and you man. He get Iavaroni at his back. He back him all the way out to the top of the key” (Via All the Smoke)

Julius Erving talking about playing with Charles Barkley: “I kept seeing his upside. He was hard-headed. He had something to say about everything. If he didn’t play as good as he can and well as he was capable of playing or whatever, then some of the things he did wouldn’t be tolerated. But they were tolerated because, you know, he was exceptional, man. He could rebound it, take it coast to coast, make play. And for his height to rebound the way that he did, it was incredible. It was kind of disruptive because we had won the championship the year before he got there. Then the year that he got there. We had to make room for him and he almost killed Marc Iavaroni cuz he was playing the four, Charles was like that’s my spot right there. This going back to violence in the game because the next man up. Me and you man. He get Iavaroni at his back. He back him all the way out to the top of the key” (Via All the Smoke)

NBA Courtside

38,407 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Who Do You Think The 3rd Person Is? Bill Gates? Klaus Schwab? Someone Else? “Nostradamus saw in his future three men that he called antichrists. One was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who is said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant. But he said, if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity, then antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people. And it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about what it's doing, it only wants power. So this is what he meant by an Antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information about him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said in the Bible, in the book of Revelation and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the man he refers to as the Antichrist is the number 666 in the Book of Revelation, called the Beast. Of course he said 666 also refers to his connection to his computers. So there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as Bible times. So he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, what happens after that is in the hands of mankind. Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios or can we lessen it? That's the point fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February the 4th, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish. And his parents were killed during the Israeli war and when he was about six or seven years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have in my work, and we had one woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a psychic who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits. But the uncle took the young boy him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed, so he could have him for himself. And he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East. They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nusrat Dhamma said, by the time seven puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young Antichrist went to college in Egypt, and we were working on this at the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.”

Who Do You Think The 3rd Person Is? Bill Gates? Klaus Schwab? Someone Else? “Nostradamus saw in his future three men that he called antichrists. One was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who is said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant. But he said, if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity, then antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people. And it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about what it's doing, it only wants power. So this is what he meant by an Antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information about him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said in the Bible, in the book of Revelation and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the man he refers to as the Antichrist is the number 666 in the Book of Revelation, called the Beast. Of course he said 666 also refers to his connection to his computers. So there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as Bible times. So he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, what happens after that is in the hands of mankind. Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios or can we lessen it? That's the point fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February the 4th, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish. And his parents were killed during the Israeli war and when he was about six or seven years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have in my work, and we had one woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a psychic who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits. But the uncle took the young boy him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed, so he could have him for himself. And he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East. They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nusrat Dhamma said, by the time seven puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young Antichrist went to college in Egypt, and we were working on this at the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.”

Wall Street Apes

1,338,694 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

This is psychotic behavior. It’s not just malignant narcissism and dementia. He has lost contact with the objective world and expects everyone to live in his alternate reality with him. It’s all manufactured by his own psyche and no amount of evidence will change it. This is a terrified inner psyche constructing a protective world. He’s insane and existentially dangerous. “Jeanine Pirro made a mistake. It was vandalism. I just told you we did, I think, 78. One of the things was to reflecting pool, hasn’t worked since 1922, because it always leaked. It always leaked from 1922. You know, it's the largest longest pool ever, all that. The concept is beautiful, but it always leaked because of the size, because of maintenance, whatever. But it was built in 1922, and from the day it was built, it like, Biden spent $58 million. Barack Hussein Obama spent much more than that. He said, "I have an idea. Let's take the river from, let's take the water from the Potomac." So they took the water from the Potomac, and it was putrid. It was putrid. It was a disaster. Biden was a disaster. I said, "I'm going to get that face." Along with Doug Burgum, Department of Interior, and we worked harder than that. Now we worked harder in all '70s. It's actually, I think, '81 now. You saw the new horses that just opened by the bridge with the gold. That was the way they were many years ago. Now they looked better than they did many years ago. But these monuments looked better than they did when they were originally built. Not just a little fix up. We made them the way they were plus, and everyone's so proud. The biggest, one of the bigger jobs was not really the biggest, believe it or not, but one of the biggest was the reflecting pool. And we did a great job. We sandblasted the stonehouse at his granite, so it has a long life. We did a great job. We got very expensive material to put on top of the surface that always leaked, because it was stone. It was a stone, sir. Always leaked. And we put it on, and it was beautiful. Now we have photographs of tapes, like moving cameras, right? We have them where people are on the side, cutting it with a box knife. So now I'm not saying I was 100% thrilled with the contractor, but the contractor was rushing. We wanted to get it open for July 4th. And we got it done. But in addition, there was mandalism. Number one, look at the grass, where the grass was all knocked out with a very powerful ingredient. We know very well what it is. But like I say, the name, because people get ideas. But they put a terrible phrase, I won't say that either, but a terrible phrase, on a massive piece of grass that we had just replaced. Kill the grass. We had to replace the grass. A lot of grass. In addition, they took knives or cutters, and they cut the material. And they put their hands and they pulled it. And there was also some maintenance things that we would have routinely fixed. But we had that up, and it was perfect. And then you had the bubblers, which get rid of what forms in the water. And that works great, but they turned it up because of the fight. Because it competed a little bit of noise during the fight. They turned it off, and it grows very rapidly in the water. But that actually works very well. And that's all. So now we're just about set to reopen it. And we had to replace cut areas where they cut it and ripped it. But there's a tape. And Jesse Wooders, by the way, did a whole big thing on it. There's a tape that's out there that I posted on truth. Where you have people leaning over the side, the weakest part, because of the flexibility. You know it moves. It's very complicated. It moves. And the softest part has to be flexible. And that's the stuff you can cut. And these guys knew what they were doing. And they cut all the way along the base, cut, cut, cut. Now, when you need to look at it, it was a day after the 4th of July, with the largest fireworks display in the world.”

This is psychotic behavior. It’s not just malignant narcissism and dementia. He has lost contact with the objective world and expects everyone to live in his alternate reality with him. It’s all manufactured by his own psyche and no amount of evidence will change it. This is a terrified inner psyche constructing a protective world. He’s insane and existentially dangerous. “Jeanine Pirro made a mistake. It was vandalism. I just told you we did, I think, 78. One of the things was to reflecting pool, hasn’t worked since 1922, because it always leaked. It always leaked from 1922. You know, it's the largest longest pool ever, all that. The concept is beautiful, but it always leaked because of the size, because of maintenance, whatever. But it was built in 1922, and from the day it was built, it like, Biden spent $58 million. Barack Hussein Obama spent much more than that. He said, "I have an idea. Let's take the river from, let's take the water from the Potomac." So they took the water from the Potomac, and it was putrid. It was putrid. It was a disaster. Biden was a disaster. I said, "I'm going to get that face." Along with Doug Burgum, Department of Interior, and we worked harder than that. Now we worked harder in all '70s. It's actually, I think, '81 now. You saw the new horses that just opened by the bridge with the gold. That was the way they were many years ago. Now they looked better than they did many years ago. But these monuments looked better than they did when they were originally built. Not just a little fix up. We made them the way they were plus, and everyone's so proud. The biggest, one of the bigger jobs was not really the biggest, believe it or not, but one of the biggest was the reflecting pool. And we did a great job. We sandblasted the stonehouse at his granite, so it has a long life. We did a great job. We got very expensive material to put on top of the surface that always leaked, because it was stone. It was a stone, sir. Always leaked. And we put it on, and it was beautiful. Now we have photographs of tapes, like moving cameras, right? We have them where people are on the side, cutting it with a box knife. So now I'm not saying I was 100% thrilled with the contractor, but the contractor was rushing. We wanted to get it open for July 4th. And we got it done. But in addition, there was mandalism. Number one, look at the grass, where the grass was all knocked out with a very powerful ingredient. We know very well what it is. But like I say, the name, because people get ideas. But they put a terrible phrase, I won't say that either, but a terrible phrase, on a massive piece of grass that we had just replaced. Kill the grass. We had to replace the grass. A lot of grass. In addition, they took knives or cutters, and they cut the material. And they put their hands and they pulled it. And there was also some maintenance things that we would have routinely fixed. But we had that up, and it was perfect. And then you had the bubblers, which get rid of what forms in the water. And that works great, but they turned it up because of the fight. Because it competed a little bit of noise during the fight. They turned it off, and it grows very rapidly in the water. But that actually works very well. And that's all. So now we're just about set to reopen it. And we had to replace cut areas where they cut it and ripped it. But there's a tape. And Jesse Wooders, by the way, did a whole big thing on it. There's a tape that's out there that I posted on truth. Where you have people leaning over the side, the weakest part, because of the flexibility. You know it moves. It's very complicated. It moves. And the softest part has to be flexible. And that's the stuff you can cut. And these guys knew what they were doing. And they cut all the way along the base, cut, cut, cut. Now, when you need to look at it, it was a day after the 4th of July, with the largest fireworks display in the world.”

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

2,263,746 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

WAKE UP AMERICA YOU ARE UNDER ATTACK ⛔️ Latest update on the WEF Maui, Lahaina Fires, Hawaii 🔥🚨 ‌ Legislation Passed in Hawaii RIGHT BEFORE & Lockheed Martin is one of the biggest donors of American Red Cross, who is also developing Weapons D.E.W's (Direct Energy Weapons) for Military ‌ “Because when I look at it, when you get into these things and you look at the history, you have so many stories which have been rewritten and then told the different thing. And then if we look at two things with the things with the governor, stuff with the governor and the things that was happening with the governor. ‌ Governor was passing bills just before this so that they can change the zoning. Think about this. They wanted to change the zoning before the event. Then the event occurs and then all of a sudden the people are going to lose their land or have their land taken from them from FEMA. And that's what FEMA does. FEMA comes in there so that they can try to say they're going to save you, just like the Red Cross. ‌ Baloney. And they're trying to say that they're going to help you when they're on the other side. If you look at the largest donator or one of the largest donators on the red Cross, it's Lockheed Martin. ‌ Lockheed Martin, THEY CREATE DEWs, DEWs (Direct Energy Weapons). So if you think about this, if the people who create the weapons are funding the people who come in after the destruction, then do you see what happens? It goes back and forth. And then in the meantime, a new story, a new fairy tale, a new history, whatever you want to say is written. ‌ We start to see this and they take over and then the history is completely lost and all the heritage is gone. The culture is gone. And they slowly keep doing this. AND THEYmVE DONE THIS SO MANY TIMES ‌ Just to see this, just to see just to to feel this through, you could feel the feel through the screen. You could feel it. You could see the pictures and know that something is so wrong ⚠️ ‌ #Hawaii #MauiFires #Lahaina

WAKE UP AMERICA YOU ARE UNDER ATTACK ⛔️ Latest update on the WEF Maui, Lahaina Fires, Hawaii 🔥🚨 ‌ Legislation Passed in Hawaii RIGHT BEFORE & Lockheed Martin is one of the biggest donors of American Red Cross, who is also developing Weapons D.E.W's (Direct Energy Weapons) for Military ‌ “Because when I look at it, when you get into these things and you look at the history, you have so many stories which have been rewritten and then told the different thing. And then if we look at two things with the things with the governor, stuff with the governor and the things that was happening with the governor. ‌ Governor was passing bills just before this so that they can change the zoning. Think about this. They wanted to change the zoning before the event. Then the event occurs and then all of a sudden the people are going to lose their land or have their land taken from them from FEMA. And that's what FEMA does. FEMA comes in there so that they can try to say they're going to save you, just like the Red Cross. ‌ Baloney. And they're trying to say that they're going to help you when they're on the other side. If you look at the largest donator or one of the largest donators on the red Cross, it's Lockheed Martin. ‌ Lockheed Martin, THEY CREATE DEWs, DEWs (Direct Energy Weapons). So if you think about this, if the people who create the weapons are funding the people who come in after the destruction, then do you see what happens? It goes back and forth. And then in the meantime, a new story, a new fairy tale, a new history, whatever you want to say is written. ‌ We start to see this and they take over and then the history is completely lost and all the heritage is gone. The culture is gone. And they slowly keep doing this. AND THEYmVE DONE THIS SO MANY TIMES ‌ Just to see this, just to see just to to feel this through, you could feel the feel through the screen. You could feel it. You could see the pictures and know that something is so wrong ⚠️ ‌ #Hawaii #MauiFires #Lahaina

Wall Street Apes

1,018,623 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) 🤔 Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not 🤔 The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~~~Extended Transcript from Segment~~~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."

[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) 🤔 Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not 🤔 The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~Extended Transcript from Segment~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."

Joe Murgia

14,839 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

"When the Pulwama incident (of 2019) happened, I told PM Modi it was our fault. He asked me to keep quiet about it. I thought they would initiate a probe. A while later, NSA Ajit Doval called me and asked me to keep quiet too. He was with me in law school. There has been no probe since. They started taking political benefits from it right from the next day saying, 'When you vote, remember the sacrifices of Pulwama soldiers'," said Satya Pal Malik, former Governor of Jammu and Kashmir, as spoke about the 2019 Pulwama terror attack. Today marks seven years since 40 CRPF personnel were martyred in the terror attack that shook the nation on 14 February 2019. Here's a lookback at Malik's conversation with Eshwar in February 2024 in which he levelled allegations against his own party's government. When asked why he did not step down as the Governor following the attack, he said: "The truth is, I had spoken up two hours after the incident. The PM was on a shoot at Jim Corbett National Park. He met me in the evening and asked about what happened. I thought there would be a probe. All this was while I was the Governor. They had asked for 5 aircraft which they had denied. I would ferry stuck students in aircraft. If they hadn't taken the road, the incident would not have happened." "People say whatever they want to. If one is to look at it responsibly, I was the head of a state. I was not there to precipitate a crisis. I could only try to explain things. I did that. I spoke to the PM about that. But I cannot be expected to resign every day over everything. I highlighted it, and I spoke up," he said.

"When the Pulwama incident (of 2019) happened, I told PM Modi it was our fault. He asked me to keep quiet about it. I thought they would initiate a probe. A while later, NSA Ajit Doval called me and asked me to keep quiet too. He was with me in law school. There has been no probe since. They started taking political benefits from it right from the next day saying, 'When you vote, remember the sacrifices of Pulwama soldiers'," said Satya Pal Malik, former Governor of Jammu and Kashmir, as spoke about the 2019 Pulwama terror attack. Today marks seven years since 40 CRPF personnel were martyred in the terror attack that shook the nation on 14 February 2019. Here's a lookback at Malik's conversation with Eshwar in February 2024 in which he levelled allegations against his own party's government. When asked why he did not step down as the Governor following the attack, he said: "The truth is, I had spoken up two hours after the incident. The PM was on a shoot at Jim Corbett National Park. He met me in the evening and asked about what happened. I thought there would be a probe. All this was while I was the Governor. They had asked for 5 aircraft which they had denied. I would ferry stuck students in aircraft. If they hadn't taken the road, the incident would not have happened." "People say whatever they want to. If one is to look at it responsibly, I was the head of a state. I was not there to precipitate a crisis. I could only try to explain things. I did that. I spoke to the PM about that. But I cannot be expected to resign every day over everything. I highlighted it, and I spoke up," he said.

The Quint

97,097 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🔥 NEW: Fox’s Tyrus NAILS IT on rescue of second airman stranded in Iran: “That decision was his presidency. You understand that if one person had died what this news cycle would have been. If one pilot hadn’t got out, they’d be screaming war crimes and more.” “They knew this was his win because all they could talk about was his language. ‘Did you hear what he said?’ You’re damn right I heard what he said!” “They said it was ‘so uncouth, not traditional and not presidential’. The thing for me is I’ve noticed people who cuss are telling it straight. So now I have a President that speaks the same language I do.” “He was willing to put his career on the line and his own team were saying the risk is high, but he went with his gut. With leadership, that’s the difference between being great when you do things for the people regardless of what it does to you politically. That was a perfect example,” adds Tyrus

🔥 NEW: Fox’s Tyrus NAILS IT on rescue of second airman stranded in Iran: “That decision was his presidency. You understand that if one person had died what this news cycle would have been. If one pilot hadn’t got out, they’d be screaming war crimes and more.” “They knew this was his win because all they could talk about was his language. ‘Did you hear what he said?’ You’re damn right I heard what he said!” “They said it was ‘so uncouth, not traditional and not presidential’. The thing for me is I’ve noticed people who cuss are telling it straight. So now I have a President that speaks the same language I do.” “He was willing to put his career on the line and his own team were saying the risk is high, but he went with his gut. With leadership, that’s the difference between being great when you do things for the people regardless of what it does to you politically. That was a perfect example,” adds Tyrus

TV News Now

771,694 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"If you look at what has happened in Eastern Congo, and everything we have gone through over the past four or five years, and you look at what we have left behind, there is evidence. There are facts that speak for themselves. In Eastern Congo, in Goma and elsewhere, the whole world came together against Rwanda. The whole world lined up against Rwanda: the FDLR and all the groups associated with it that have been mentioned, the Wazalendo, the Burundian forces, the FARDC, the South Africans, and many others. I would rather not spend time naming them all; there were so many. When you look at the scale of what they had assembled there and what they were up against, it is clear that what they were trying to do was wage war against Rwanda, destabilize our country, and reshape it the way they wanted. In fact, they said so themselves. Ordinarily, if someone were to say these things without evidence, you might think they were simply trying to frighten people, to intimidate them. To convince themselves that what they wanted was within reach and that they were going to achieve it, they even brought in mercenaries. You know that many of them passed through here. We gave free passage to our enemies, allowing them to leave a war they waged against us, a war that was never theirs to begin with. That alone tells you something. And it is also something for which our forces, together with others who stood with them, deserve recognition. As for Rwanda, we will always be in a struggle for our very existence. Regardless of those who wish us harm, surrounding us from many sides, one thing remains true: we should and will always be a step ahead of them. It is our right. It is our will. And our history has taught us that we have within ourselves the capacity to defend and protect ourselves whenever necessary. And that is exactly what we will continue to do." President Kagame | Unity Club Meeting

"If you look at what has happened in Eastern Congo, and everything we have gone through over the past four or five years, and you look at what we have left behind, there is evidence. There are facts that speak for themselves. In Eastern Congo, in Goma and elsewhere, the whole world came together against Rwanda. The whole world lined up against Rwanda: the FDLR and all the groups associated with it that have been mentioned, the Wazalendo, the Burundian forces, the FARDC, the South Africans, and many others. I would rather not spend time naming them all; there were so many. When you look at the scale of what they had assembled there and what they were up against, it is clear that what they were trying to do was wage war against Rwanda, destabilize our country, and reshape it the way they wanted. In fact, they said so themselves. Ordinarily, if someone were to say these things without evidence, you might think they were simply trying to frighten people, to intimidate them. To convince themselves that what they wanted was within reach and that they were going to achieve it, they even brought in mercenaries. You know that many of them passed through here. We gave free passage to our enemies, allowing them to leave a war they waged against us, a war that was never theirs to begin with. That alone tells you something. And it is also something for which our forces, together with others who stood with them, deserve recognition. As for Rwanda, we will always be in a struggle for our very existence. Regardless of those who wish us harm, surrounding us from many sides, one thing remains true: we should and will always be a step ahead of them. It is our right. It is our will. And our history has taught us that we have within ourselves the capacity to defend and protect ourselves whenever necessary. And that is exactly what we will continue to do." President Kagame | Unity Club Meeting

Presidency | Rwanda

80,852 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

“I can’t speak on whether he was close to converting…I do think from what I’ve been told that he was planning on signing up and starting that process [of becoming Catholic]. But I did not personally have that conversation with him…” A few things: Candace says she can’t speak on whether Charlie was close to converting to Catholicism—and then immediately goes on to speak about how she thinks he was close to converting. 🙄 Additionally, the first time she ever spoke about this (September 15th, see the 2nd clip below) she suggested he was close to converting. Because it’s Candace, she didn’t come right out and say, but she said he “was on the verge of changing some of his beliefs” and then went on to speak about how he was praying the rosary and attending mass. She also referenced him “taking that last step.” All of those things paired together imply (again without outright saying) he was close to converting. She also said in the same episode he was “too smart to be Protestant.” Mind you, this was FIVE DAYS after Charlie had been murdered. Charlie’s parents are Protestant. His wife was raised Catholic but is now Protestant. And whether you think he was close to converting or not, Charlie died Protestant. Her saying that FIVE DAYS after his murder was callous and tone deaf. This is how Candace makes things always and all about herself. This was in fact the first thing that clued me in that something was seriously wrong, after previously being her fan. Today, she doubled down on her implications that Charlie was close to converting (even though again she’d just said she couldn’t speak on that). She said she and Charlie were having conversations about it, but the only evidence she’s ever presented is a single vague text allegedly from him and dated February 2024. The problem is that Charlie went on to reiterate he was evangelical and all of his issues with the Catholic faith this year, in the months leading up to his death. Indeed, one of the final things he said on this earth the day he died was that he was evangelical. So even if he sent that text to Candace in February of 2024, it’s clear he wasn’t that convicted and that she read more into it than was actually meant. Because again, this year, in 2025, he was reaffirming his evangelical faith. Lastly, Candace admitted today that she heard from someone else that Charlie was becoming Catholic (likely Bishop Joseph Brennan). But if she and Charlie were already having conversations about the possibility of him converting (as she claims they were), why wouldn’t he tell Candace directly? Especially when again they allegedly were already having conversations about it? Please listen to what this woman actually says from one month, one week, one day to the next. And parse it out. Hear what she’s saying and also what she’s not saying. Determine what she’s implying. Compare herself to herself. And see if she makes sense to you, if she provides clarity to you, if she provides evidence. Not just on the subject of Charlie converting but on all subjects pertaining to this “investigation.” Finally, this has NOTHING to do with who murdered Charlie and why. I’m tired of talking about it, but she keeps being dishonest about what she actually said, again a mere five days after his murder.

“I can’t speak on whether he was close to converting…I do think from what I’ve been told that he was planning on signing up and starting that process [of becoming Catholic]. But I did not personally have that conversation with him…” A few things: Candace says she can’t speak on whether Charlie was close to converting to Catholicism—and then immediately goes on to speak about how she thinks he was close to converting. 🙄 Additionally, the first time she ever spoke about this (September 15th, see the 2nd clip below) she suggested he was close to converting. Because it’s Candace, she didn’t come right out and say, but she said he “was on the verge of changing some of his beliefs” and then went on to speak about how he was praying the rosary and attending mass. She also referenced him “taking that last step.” All of those things paired together imply (again without outright saying) he was close to converting. She also said in the same episode he was “too smart to be Protestant.” Mind you, this was FIVE DAYS after Charlie had been murdered. Charlie’s parents are Protestant. His wife was raised Catholic but is now Protestant. And whether you think he was close to converting or not, Charlie died Protestant. Her saying that FIVE DAYS after his murder was callous and tone deaf. This is how Candace makes things always and all about herself. This was in fact the first thing that clued me in that something was seriously wrong, after previously being her fan. Today, she doubled down on her implications that Charlie was close to converting (even though again she’d just said she couldn’t speak on that). She said she and Charlie were having conversations about it, but the only evidence she’s ever presented is a single vague text allegedly from him and dated February 2024. The problem is that Charlie went on to reiterate he was evangelical and all of his issues with the Catholic faith this year, in the months leading up to his death. Indeed, one of the final things he said on this earth the day he died was that he was evangelical. So even if he sent that text to Candace in February of 2024, it’s clear he wasn’t that convicted and that she read more into it than was actually meant. Because again, this year, in 2025, he was reaffirming his evangelical faith. Lastly, Candace admitted today that she heard from someone else that Charlie was becoming Catholic (likely Bishop Joseph Brennan). But if she and Charlie were already having conversations about the possibility of him converting (as she claims they were), why wouldn’t he tell Candace directly? Especially when again they allegedly were already having conversations about it? Please listen to what this woman actually says from one month, one week, one day to the next. And parse it out. Hear what she’s saying and also what she’s not saying. Determine what she’s implying. Compare herself to herself. And see if she makes sense to you, if she provides clarity to you, if she provides evidence. Not just on the subject of Charlie converting but on all subjects pertaining to this “investigation.” Finally, this has NOTHING to do with who murdered Charlie and why. I’m tired of talking about it, but she keeps being dishonest about what she actually said, again a mere five days after his murder.

Natalie Jean Beisner

42,513 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨While sex trafficking underage girls to the elites, Jeffrey Epstein was EXTREMELY effective at flying under the radar! IT WAS ALL BY CONTROL ⚠️ He had significant influence over and regularly met with many powerful people… YET THE MEDIA RARELY COVERED HIM (If Ever)! THEY WERE HELPING TO HIDE HIS DESPICABLE CRIMES FOR DECADES! TOP MEDIA BOSSES MADE SURE OF IT! Here is one rare exception from 2008 when Epstein was secretly filmed landing in his plane and meeting a shady figure who appears to be his boss or handler. (Credit to Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives for his talent to uncover old footage) ONCE THE VEIL OF ANONYMITY WAS FULLY LIFTED THEY HAD “NO CHOICE” BUT TO KILL JEFFREY EPSTEIN OR ELSE HE WOULD TAKE DOWN THE ENTIRE EMPIRE ⚠️ That is what most people don’t understand… THE SAME TRAFFICKING RING IS CURRENTLY STILL ACTIVE! EPSTEIN WAS ONLY ONE RUNG OF THE LATER… There are many new “Epsteins” AS WE SPEAK blackmailing the elites and running operations with near impunity. ⚠️ IT’S TIME TO BRING DOWN THE ENTIRE EMPIRE ⚠️

🚨While sex trafficking underage girls to the elites, Jeffrey Epstein was EXTREMELY effective at flying under the radar! IT WAS ALL BY CONTROL ⚠️ He had significant influence over and regularly met with many powerful people… YET THE MEDIA RARELY COVERED HIM (If Ever)! THEY WERE HELPING TO HIDE HIS DESPICABLE CRIMES FOR DECADES! TOP MEDIA BOSSES MADE SURE OF IT! Here is one rare exception from 2008 when Epstein was secretly filmed landing in his plane and meeting a shady figure who appears to be his boss or handler. (Credit to Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives for his talent to uncover old footage) ONCE THE VEIL OF ANONYMITY WAS FULLY LIFTED THEY HAD “NO CHOICE” BUT TO KILL JEFFREY EPSTEIN OR ELSE HE WOULD TAKE DOWN THE ENTIRE EMPIRE ⚠️ That is what most people don’t understand… THE SAME TRAFFICKING RING IS CURRENTLY STILL ACTIVE! EPSTEIN WAS ONLY ONE RUNG OF THE LATER… There are many new “Epsteins” AS WE SPEAK blackmailing the elites and running operations with near impunity. ⚠️ IT’S TIME TO BRING DOWN THE ENTIRE EMPIRE ⚠️

Matt Wallace

2,949,186 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren