Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Anthony Pompliano’s message to tariff critics is simple: “Got a better plan?” While critics worry that Trump’s tariffs could trigger a recession, Pomp argues this is the best option we have right now. Short-term pain, long-term gain. Tariffs, he says, are the clearest path to: 1. Raise revenue for...

246,618 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Natalie Brunell ⚡️
Natalie Brunell ⚡️vor 1 Jahr

Paid Partnerships: @GeniusGroupLtd_: @BitwiseInvest: @CasaHODL: @SpeedWallet: promo code COINSTORIES10 @TheBitcoinWay_: @Coinkite:

Profilbild von Vance Ginn
Vance Ginnvor 1 Jahr

Dive into the critical issues shaping economic policy, from President-elect Trump’s sweeping tariff proposals to the challenges Texas faces under rising government spending. Now is the time for bold reforms to protect taxpayers and ensure economic freedom thrives.

Profilbild von Brian Shulman
Brian Shulmanvor 1 Jahr

Sure...someone who scammed people through a lot of money with blockfi who re-made his image with a fancy suit thinking people would forget now schooling people on tariffs.

Profilbild von Dr. T
Dr. Tvor 1 Jahr

Anthony has no financial acumen. Nor has he ever built or run or factory in the US. Complete idiot.

Profilbild von Zen
Zenvor 1 Jahr

He’s wrong on this one Natalie. Even the best estimates say it would take a concerted effort with massive government subsidies/support and nearly a decade to revive the manufacturing sector in America to be somewhat competitive with China. If we are honest with ourselves there is no societal or political will here for the enormous amount of pain America has to endure to re-industrialize. The center of America’s social contract is our citizens having access to cheap goods bought with the world’s reserve currency that we endlessly print at will. Try taking that privilege away from us and the country literally will begin to devour itself. China is betting that we will be the first to cry uncle, and so far I see nothing to suggest it will be them.

Profilbild von wafdawg
wafdawgvor 1 Jahr

Never go full retard Pomp. Only way we going back to ATH is to reverse the retardedness

Profilbild von Mel Mattison
Mel Mattisonvor 1 Jahr

Yes. Would love to come on your show and discuss it. It involves massive but super-targeted manufacturing incentives and subsidies for those areas of our economy which are essential for defense and sovereignty combined with U.S. made purchase requirements. These are things like medical devices autos (b/c auto plants can best be shifted to military needs in time of war), ships, medications, and a few others. It gets paid for by gold revaluation and other non-debt producing mechanisms. This will be inflationary but will create jobs and real wage growth. Think 5% inflation with 7% wage growth. It will also reduce the real value of our debt and decrease debt to GDP over time. Instead of an economic breakdown, it will be a massive boom.

Profilbild von Tom Emmet
Tom Emmetvor 1 Jahr

He might want to go home and wash the dogs. His tweets are not ageing well on 24hr cycles.

Profilbild von Walter Schweitzer
Walter Schweitzervor 1 Jahr

Raise revenue? Larger government? 1 trillion defense budget here we go. Reshore minimum wage jobs that nobody wants. Take off that fucking tie then Pomp and get to work.

Profilbild von willweathersby
willweathersbyvor 1 Jahr

I’m going to go with Druckemiller and Griffin’s views on tariffs before Pomp.

Profilbild von RichS 🍄
RichS 🍄vor 1 Jahr

Pomp: Failed shitcoin influencer Failed Bitcoin influencer. Failed Bitcoin investor. Now he is a tariff expert. Ok!

Ähnliche Videos

Trump, the Dollar and China: What to watch for in 2025 Trump wants to boost exports, bring back American jobs from overseas and reduce the trade deficit. To achieve this he needs a weaker dollar. Trump also wants a strong dollar and will not brook any challenges to its near monopoly of international payments. Can he possibly have both? Trump’s Problem No.1: His announced tariffs will most likely boost the dollar as a result of increased uncertainty globally. Even if he slaps large tariffs on imports, the increase in the dollar’s value will eliminate the downward pressures on imports and the US trade deficit. Trump’s Problem No.2: His announced large tax cuts for the rich will boost the influx of foreign capital into the US, further boosting the dollar and the gap between domestic savings & investment, which is the root cause of the US trade deficit. Trump’s Problem No. 3: The near monopoly of the US dollar over international transactions is what ensures the paradox that, whenever things go bad in the US economy, the dollar rises. If Trump were serious about the US trade deficit, and his stated objective of wanting to push the dollar down to make US exports more attractive, he should want to end the dollar’s global dominance. But that would spell the end of the United States as a global hegemon – something Trump does not want to see happen on his watch. Perhaps what might work for Trump would be something similar to what Ronald Reagan did to Japan in the so-called 1985 Plaza Accords: he gave them the ultimatumn “appreciate your currency massively or face massive tariffs on your exports”. Can Trump do the same to China? China is no Japan – it will not roll over that easily. Talking of China, Beijing also faces a great dilemma in 2025 and beyond: · To stay put and play for time until the US internal contradictions play out? · Or to turn the BRICS into a Bretton-Woods-like system, with the yuan at its heart? Beijing has not made up its mind. In the next year, or years, we shall know the answers. Till then, be well.

Yanis Varoufakis

269,151 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Bessent: Don’t Need Trade Deal with China, We Make Revenues Off Tariffs, ‘It’s Not Broke’ | Ian Hanchett, Breitbart News On Tuesday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Ingraham Angle,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent responded to a question on whether or not a trade deal with China is needed by stating that “China is, right now, the biggest revenue line in the tariff income” and remarking, “if it’s not broke, don’t fix it.” But Bessent also said there have been “very good talks with China” and he thinks there will be further discussions with them. Host Laura Ingraham asked, [relevant exchange begins around 8:30] “When do you expect that we will see movement on the China talks, and do we need a trade agreement with China, given how well the tariffs are working out?” Bessent answered, “Look, we’re very happy is — we had 20% — about 20, 25% tariffs in President Trump’s first term. We’ve added 20% fentanyl tariffs, 10% baseline tariffs. So, we’re at 50 or 55%. China is, right now, the biggest revenue line in the tariff income. So, if it’s not broke, don’t fix it. We have had very good talks with China. I imagine we’ll be seeing them again before November. They have a 10% tariff on us. They have started shipping the rare earth magnets, which we agreed to. We had put some countermeasures on them that we’ve taken off. So, I think, right now, the status quo’s working pretty well.”

Owen Gregorian

52,754 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten