Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "I was inside OpenAI when GPT learned to code. I watched it happen in real time Ilya said: 'the models just want to learn.' I listened and I became enlightened then I left with 7 people and built Claude. not because OpenAI was wrong -...

256,609 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

19 Kommentare

Profilbild von 风雪漫千山
风雪漫千山vor 3 Monaten

只要故事讲得足够动听, 分赃不均都能包装得如此神圣啊!

Profilbild von Gabe
Gabevor 3 Monaten

"Don't get in the way" "Delete your IDE" "Pay more - your usage ran out for running a simple loop" "You are not eligible to use this model" "I'm just a dick rider here to sell a shitty model that does the job you should be doing yourself"

Profilbild von CoolBreeze-cn
CoolBreeze-cnvor 3 Monaten

这个傻逼越看越恶心。

Profilbild von Trustmebro
Trustmebrovor 3 Monaten

This guy is a greedy Bug eater.

Profilbild von Clustz News • AI | Tech | World | Gaming | More
Clustz News • AI | Tech | World | Gaming | Morevor 3 Monaten

People underestimate how much the edge now comes from speed of trying, not “knowing AI.” But 700 experiments only matter if you know what to test. Isn’t taste becoming the real moat now?

Profilbild von wladwtf
wladwtfvor 3 Monaten

Anthropic approach seems really promising

Profilbild von Pearl AI
Pearl AIvor 3 Monaten

Inspiring message, but no model replaces execution.

Profilbild von FW
FWvor 3 Monaten

Talks a lot, says very little

Profilbild von Dipanshu Kushwaha
Dipanshu Kushwahavor 3 Monaten

That’s awesome—believing in the shift and starting Claude shows real vision. Congrats on riding the AI wave and building something meaningful. Here's to continued breakthroughs.

Profilbild von AI Mastery Guide
AI Mastery Guidevor 3 Monaten

700 experiments in 2 nights finding what took 20 years to miss is kind of nuts.

Profilbild von dunik
dunikvor 3 Monaten

the real AI advantage isn’t knowing more it’s running more experiments than everyone else.

Profilbild von Adel Bucetta
Adel Bucettavor 3 Monaten

the honest answer is that the most valuable insights often come from watching failures, not successes. and sometimes you just have to leave and build something new instead of trying to fix what's already broken

Profilbild von Cassian Walker
Cassian Walkervor 3 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Starting July 1, a new California law mandates that streaming platforms must ensure advertisements do not exceed the volume level of the primary content being watched, finally addressing long-standing viewer complaints about jarring commercial audio.

Profilbild von 安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB
安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNBvor 3 Monaten

这段有点像 AI 版创业神话了

Profilbild von Monk
Monkvor 3 Monaten

And here I am asking all four of them to rearrange and excel using a model of data from another excel and all four of them suck. Lies

Profilbild von 🇮🇱 Arys
🇮🇱 Arysvor 3 Monaten

Claude can only learn what's provided to it.

Profilbild von Pixel
Pixelvor 3 Monaten

Dario Amodei did not write this but 40,000 people will quote it like he did that's a separate and more interesting AI story

Profilbild von SWAPT
SWAPTvor 3 Monaten

Yeah very wow!!!! But we can't use. So for what that's all? Ok dream.. Goodnight

Profilbild von ~/aimi
~/aimivor 3 Monaten

700 experiments in 2 nights thats search not research

Ähnliche Videos

For months, I've been quietly building a prototype of something just because I want it to exist. Papyrus is a word processor, editor, proofreader, fact-checker, deep researcher, brainstorming partner, all in one. It takes your rough draft and helps you skip three revisions. Now I'm considering pivoting my whole team to build it out, but first, I need your vote. You email is your vote. LINK IN COMMENTS. I don't even care if you use some email you never look at and just use for sign ups. To me one email is one vote and says, go ahead and build this damn thing out and make it awesome. I built it because today's apps are the bloated dial-ups of writing (Word, GDocs). They've got a hundred freaking buttons I don't need and bury the ones I do need. Or they're AI marketing slop toys that promise to read my mind and pump out garbage. They just don't get the real work of writing and they don't get me. I want a clean, focused space with a real AI co-pilot. I don't need it to do the all the writing for me, just like I don't need Claude Code to do all the code for me. I want to work with it. I want a writing partner that acts like a full writing team on-call 24X7: proofreading, fact-checking, and running deep research in the background while I focus on the hard parts. I'm tired of cutting and pasting between a dozen tools so I started writing this thing. But won't the big guys just build something like this? Sure. But it will just bolt your ass into their ecosystem. Google Docs will force Gemini on you. Whatever office suite OpenAI pumps out will only use GPT. I want to use any model. Open or closed. They're commodities. The app is the thing. I want the best tool for the job, GPT-5, Kimi, Qwen, Claude, whatever comes tomorrow. I want a fluid, flexible workspace. I'm building this thing for people who've got critical thinking and who build, who don't want to outsource every damn thing to the machine. So if that's you and you believe this should exist, I really need your vote. Tell me to build it and I'll go all-in and make it a reality. Thanks for giving me a moment of your time.

Daniel Jeffries

21,386 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr