Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "I was inside OpenAI when GPT learned to code. I watched it happen in real time Ilya said: 'the models just want to learn.' I listened and I became enlightened then I left with 7 people and built Claude. not because OpenAI was wrong -...

0xCodila's profile picture

codila

13,015 subscribers

256,371 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Anthropic CEOs Dario and Daniela Amodei: "We left OpenAI with 7 people. Everyone thought we were crazy. Three and a half years later - all 7 co-founders are still here. At OpenAI? Ask them how many are left " they left OpenAI to build an AI that makes you better - not one that makes you comfortable Claude won't agree with you just because you want it to. That's the whole point "Use Claude to think harder, not to stop thinking " 40-min - bookmark and watch today!
21:06

Anthropic CEOs Dario and Daniela Amodei: "We left OpenAI with 7 people. Everyone thought we were crazy. Three and a half years later - all 7 co-founders are still here. At OpenAI? Ask them how many are left " they left OpenAI to build an AI that makes you better - not one that makes you comfortable Claude won't agree with you just because you want it to. That's the whole point "Use Claude to think harder, not to stop thinking " 40-min - bookmark and watch today!

codila

373,261 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code, just explained why the features most users never find are the ones that matter most in this podcast he breaks down not just how to use Claude, but what it all means for the next few years: > the right way to give Claude context before it starts working > why giving it too much information is just as bad as too little > how Claude Code is already changing how engineers build things > how the people who built Claude actually use it day to day based on this podcast and months of using Claude myself, I put together a guide on everything Claude can do that most people have no idea exists you can find it below
1:22:03

Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code, just explained why the features most users never find are the ones that matter most in this podcast he breaks down not just how to use Claude, but what it all means for the next few years: > the right way to give Claude context before it starts working > why giving it too much information is just as bad as too little > how Claude Code is already changing how engineers build things > how the people who built Claude actually use it day to day based on this podcast and months of using Claude myself, I put together a guide on everything Claude can do that most people have no idea exists you can find it below

Anatoli Kopadze

22,513 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

"I never liked ['Be Joe Pyfer']. It's fake love, man. It was always cringe to me just because I don't want people walk up and telling me, 'Be Joe Pyfer.' It's corny. I did like the message of it. I didn't like it for the reasons people interpreted it. I liked it for the way that [Dana White] said it and he was saying, if you want to be in the UFC and this is where you want to be, act like Joe Pyfer, which was, I was passionate, I was vulgar, I screamed at him, I knocked the guy out, and I called my shot. I was a resilient motherfucker." - Bodybagz_Pyfer
1:27

"I never liked ['Be Joe Pyfer']. It's fake love, man. It was always cringe to me just because I don't want people walk up and telling me, 'Be Joe Pyfer.' It's corny. I did like the message of it. I didn't like it for the reasons people interpreted it. I liked it for the way that [Dana White] said it and he was saying, if you want to be in the UFC and this is where you want to be, act like Joe Pyfer, which was, I was passionate, I was vulgar, I screamed at him, I knocked the guy out, and I called my shot. I was a resilient motherfucker." - Bodybagz_Pyfer

Ariel Helwani

195,018 просмотров • 1 год назад

Michael Knowles literally just called for the ERADICATION of Transgenderism. I can't stress how DANGEROUS this is. When I was a teen I remember laughing at a transgender woman. -I laughed because they were different. -I laughed because others were laughing and I wanted to fit in. -I laughed because I didn't understand it. I was IGNORANT! This smug, bigoted adult is what happens when people don't learn. It's what happens when people remain ignorant. It's what happens when hateful people want to push an agenda through division. IT MUST STOP!
0:39

Michael Knowles literally just called for the ERADICATION of Transgenderism. I can't stress how DANGEROUS this is. When I was a teen I remember laughing at a transgender woman. -I laughed because they were different. -I laughed because others were laughing and I wanted to fit in. -I laughed because I didn't understand it. I was IGNORANT! This smug, bigoted adult is what happens when people don't learn. It's what happens when people remain ignorant. It's what happens when hateful people want to push an agenda through division. IT MUST STOP!

Brian Krassenstein

2,337,650 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Claude Code creator: "I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops that figure out what to do. My job is to create loops." in 30 minutes Boris breaks down his daily Claude Code setup, step by step the person who built the tool doesn't use it the way most people think no prompts, no chat box, just loops running on their own I broke down 17 Claude features most people have never found full guide in the post below
29:49

Claude Code creator: "I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops that figure out what to do. My job is to create loops." in 30 minutes Boris breaks down his daily Claude Code setup, step by step the person who built the tool doesn't use it the way most people think no prompts, no chat box, just loops running on their own I broke down 17 Claude features most people have never found full guide in the post below

Anatoli Kopadze

412,210 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "Some early companies got Mythos and told us this is a super weapon, please don't release it" On leaving OpenAI: "When you can't trust someone, and their values don't match what they say, it becomes very hard to stay" Boris Cherny, head of Claude Code: "90% of code at Anthropic is written by Claude, a lot of Claude Code is written by Claude Code" Then Dario says the quiet part even louder: 10–25% odds of civilizational collapse from AI 47 minutes Free Dario, Daniela, Boris Probably the deepest look inside Anthropic ever filmed Mythos Claude Code OpenAI split Superweapon models 90% AI-written code Bookmark it and watch ↓
48:30

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "Some early companies got Mythos and told us this is a super weapon, please don't release it" On leaving OpenAI: "When you can't trust someone, and their values don't match what they say, it becomes very hard to stay" Boris Cherny, head of Claude Code: "90% of code at Anthropic is written by Claude, a lot of Claude Code is written by Claude Code" Then Dario says the quiet part even louder: 10–25% odds of civilizational collapse from AI 47 minutes Free Dario, Daniela, Boris Probably the deepest look inside Anthropic ever filmed Mythos Claude Code OpenAI split Superweapon models 90% AI-written code Bookmark it and watch ↓

rari

65,014 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"My feeling is this. I'm not pro-immigration. I'm not anti-immigration. What I want is for people who are not corrupt, who are well-informed about the issue, to figure out what the best level of immigration is and to set up a process that works. I don't want to see any illegals. I want to see people who come in legally. I want to see the number. Maybe it's a high number. Maybe it's a low number. I don't know, but I'd like to see the right number. I'd like us to at least aspire to it. And then most important of all, and I see this in both England and the US, somewhere along the line, we apparently decided it was impolite to ask people who wished to come to our countries, whether they liked us and aspired to be a part of our civilization. And my feeling is whatever the number is that we should be allowing in, I don't want any who don't aspire to be American. I want people who like it, who want to make the place better and want to participate in it because they see it as good. We should not be letting people in who want to destroy it. Obviously, I can't imagine that anyone has to say that out loud, but apparently it has to be said out loud because it's not obvious to a lot of people. And the point is, it is what I just said anti-immigrant? No, it's anti-people who hate us. And I have a right to be anti-people who hate us..." - Bret Weinstein on immigration, with Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
2:36

"My feeling is this. I'm not pro-immigration. I'm not anti-immigration. What I want is for people who are not corrupt, who are well-informed about the issue, to figure out what the best level of immigration is and to set up a process that works. I don't want to see any illegals. I want to see people who come in legally. I want to see the number. Maybe it's a high number. Maybe it's a low number. I don't know, but I'd like to see the right number. I'd like us to at least aspire to it. And then most important of all, and I see this in both England and the US, somewhere along the line, we apparently decided it was impolite to ask people who wished to come to our countries, whether they liked us and aspired to be a part of our civilization. And my feeling is whatever the number is that we should be allowing in, I don't want any who don't aspire to be American. I want people who like it, who want to make the place better and want to participate in it because they see it as good. We should not be letting people in who want to destroy it. Obviously, I can't imagine that anyone has to say that out loud, but apparently it has to be said out loud because it's not obvious to a lot of people. And the point is, it is what I just said anti-immigrant? No, it's anti-people who hate us. And I have a right to be anti-people who hate us..." - Bret Weinstein on immigration, with Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

The Darkhorse Podcast

152,191 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Anthropic shows this video to every new employee. Someone re-uploaded it. I hope Anthropic doesn't see this. 14 minutes of how the Claude team actually uses Claude in real work. I watched the recording last night and kept pausing it. Each time realizing I've been using Claude like a toy. claude.md + loops is what makes Claude stop fighting you and start working for you. Most people will keep using Claude the hard way.
15:14

Anthropic shows this video to every new employee. Someone re-uploaded it. I hope Anthropic doesn't see this. 14 minutes of how the Claude team actually uses Claude in real work. I watched the recording last night and kept pausing it. Each time realizing I've been using Claude like a toy. claude.md + loops is what makes Claude stop fighting you and start working for you. Most people will keep using Claude the hard way.

Raytar

257,844 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Holy moly Never seen someone being that bullish for AI developement as Dario Amodei: - There's just an exponential just like we had an exponential with Moore's law - I think the models are just going to get more and more capable at everything - I've had internal people at Anthropic say, "I don't write any code anymore. I don't write I don't open up an editor and write code. I just let Claude code write the first draft and and all I do is edit it. - What what we're going to see in the future is just like we've going to be seen in the past except more so - the models are just going to get more and more intellectually capable and you know the the revenue is going to keep adding zeros. holy moly, Dario!
1:06

Holy moly Never seen someone being that bullish for AI developement as Dario Amodei: - There's just an exponential just like we had an exponential with Moore's law - I think the models are just going to get more and more capable at everything - I've had internal people at Anthropic say, "I don't write any code anymore. I don't write I don't open up an editor and write code. I just let Claude code write the first draft and and all I do is edit it. - What what we're going to see in the future is just like we've going to be seen in the past except more so - the models are just going to get more and more intellectually capable and you know the the revenue is going to keep adding zeros. holy moly, Dario!

Chubby♨️

77,711 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

You can just tell Claude Code to learn skills and it will. I asked Claude to create an app that uses tldraw and it one shotted it with sqlite db, and then I asked Claude Code to create a skill so that it could read and write on the canvas. 10 minutes later it could do it. Weirrrrdddd times.
0:25

You can just tell Claude Code to learn skills and it will. I asked Claude to create an app that uses tldraw and it one shotted it with sqlite db, and then I asked Claude Code to create a skill so that it could read and write on the canvas. 10 minutes later it could do it. Weirrrrdddd times.

Riley Brown

73,418 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨 Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei just dropped a massive timeline update at Davos 2026: “I have engineers within Anthropic who say ‘I don’t write any code anymore. I just let the model write the code, I edit it’... - the creator of Claude code recently also said “100% of his contributions to Claude code were written by Claude code” for the month of December Dario then goes onto say: “We might be 6 to 12 months away from when the model is doing most, maybe all of what SWEs do end-to-end.” If the recursive self-improvement loop closes this year, the curve is about to go vertical.
1:41

🚨 Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei just dropped a massive timeline update at Davos 2026: “I have engineers within Anthropic who say ‘I don’t write any code anymore. I just let the model write the code, I edit it’... - the creator of Claude code recently also said “100% of his contributions to Claude code were written by Claude code” for the month of December Dario then goes onto say: “We might be 6 to 12 months away from when the model is doing most, maybe all of what SWEs do end-to-end.” If the recursive self-improvement loop closes this year, the curve is about to go vertical.

Chris

680,618 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Dario Amodei reveals the two convictions that made him leave OpenAI to start Anthropic "The first conviction was the scaling laws" "If you scale up models, give them more data and more compute, you find incredible increases in performance. I was finding that in 2019 with GPT-2" "There were a lot of folks inside and outside who didn't believe it at all. We made the case to leadership, this is going to be a big deal" "The second was, if these models are going to match the capability of the human brain, we better get this right" "Despite a lot of language about doing it in the right way, I was just not convinced there was a real and serious conviction to do it the right way"
4:12

Dario Amodei reveals the two convictions that made him leave OpenAI to start Anthropic "The first conviction was the scaling laws" "If you scale up models, give them more data and more compute, you find incredible increases in performance. I was finding that in 2019 with GPT-2" "There were a lot of folks inside and outside who didn't believe it at all. We made the case to leadership, this is going to be a big deal" "The second was, if these models are going to match the capability of the human brain, we better get this right" "Despite a lot of language about doing it in the right way, I was just not convinced there was a real and serious conviction to do it the right way"

Jaynit Makwana

248,140 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Anthropic team: "Most people are prompting Claude wrong" They dropped a 24-minute workshop on how Claude prompts are actually built Free From the people who built the model There are 6 elements in a real Claude prompt Most people use 1 That is why their outputs feel generic Better wording is not enough Claude rewards structure, context, examples, constraints, and feedback I watched it twice Then built a Claude Skill that applies all 6 automatically You write normally The skill structures the prompt before Claude sees it Bookmark and watch this Then save the setup below
24:17

Anthropic team: "Most people are prompting Claude wrong" They dropped a 24-minute workshop on how Claude prompts are actually built Free From the people who built the model There are 6 elements in a real Claude prompt Most people use 1 That is why their outputs feel generic Better wording is not enough Claude rewards structure, context, examples, constraints, and feedback I watched it twice Then built a Claude Skill that applies all 6 automatically You write normally The skill structures the prompt before Claude sees it Bookmark and watch this Then save the setup below

rari

15,655 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Stop what you're doing. Claude Opus 4.6 just released and it's incredible Both OpenClaw and Claude Code are 10x better with it It's now my daily driver for both In this video I cover EVERYTHING you need to know about Opus, and how to get the most out of it:
17:28

Stop what you're doing. Claude Opus 4.6 just released and it's incredible Both OpenClaw and Claude Code are 10x better with it It's now my daily driver for both In this video I cover EVERYTHING you need to know about Opus, and how to get the most out of it:

Alex Finn

72,568 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Charlie Munger: “When I saw that psychology was necessary, and I didn't have it, I didn't just learn the little tendencies well enough to get A's in psychology. I learned those tendencies well enough to synthesize them with the rest of knowledge—That's the right way to do it.”
1:02

Charlie Munger: “When I saw that psychology was necessary, and I didn't have it, I didn't just learn the little tendencies well enough to get A's in psychology. I learned those tendencies well enough to synthesize them with the rest of knowledge—That's the right way to do it.”

Investment Wisdom

33,421 просмотров • 1 год назад

For months, I've been quietly building a prototype of something just because I want it to exist. Papyrus is a word processor, editor, proofreader, fact-checker, deep researcher, brainstorming partner, all in one. It takes your rough draft and helps you skip three revisions. Now I'm considering pivoting my whole team to build it out, but first, I need your vote. You email is your vote. LINK IN COMMENTS. I don't even care if you use some email you never look at and just use for sign ups. To me one email is one vote and says, go ahead and build this damn thing out and make it awesome. I built it because today's apps are the bloated dial-ups of writing (Word, GDocs). They've got a hundred freaking buttons I don't need and bury the ones I do need. Or they're AI marketing slop toys that promise to read my mind and pump out garbage. They just don't get the real work of writing and they don't get me. I want a clean, focused space with a real AI co-pilot. I don't need it to do the all the writing for me, just like I don't need Claude Code to do all the code for me. I want to work with it. I want a writing partner that acts like a full writing team on-call 24X7: proofreading, fact-checking, and running deep research in the background while I focus on the hard parts. I'm tired of cutting and pasting between a dozen tools so I started writing this thing. But won't the big guys just build something like this? Sure. But it will just bolt your ass into their ecosystem. Google Docs will force Gemini on you. Whatever office suite OpenAI pumps out will only use GPT. I want to use any model. Open or closed. They're commodities. The app is the thing. I want the best tool for the job, GPT-5, Kimi, Qwen, Claude, whatever comes tomorrow. I want a fluid, flexible workspace. I'm building this thing for people who've got critical thinking and who build, who don't want to outsource every damn thing to the machine. So if that's you and you believe this should exist, I really need your vote. Tell me to build it and I'll go all-in and make it a reality. Thanks for giving me a moment of your time.
2:45

For months, I've been quietly building a prototype of something just because I want it to exist. Papyrus is a word processor, editor, proofreader, fact-checker, deep researcher, brainstorming partner, all in one. It takes your rough draft and helps you skip three revisions. Now I'm considering pivoting my whole team to build it out, but first, I need your vote. You email is your vote. LINK IN COMMENTS. I don't even care if you use some email you never look at and just use for sign ups. To me one email is one vote and says, go ahead and build this damn thing out and make it awesome. I built it because today's apps are the bloated dial-ups of writing (Word, GDocs). They've got a hundred freaking buttons I don't need and bury the ones I do need. Or they're AI marketing slop toys that promise to read my mind and pump out garbage. They just don't get the real work of writing and they don't get me. I want a clean, focused space with a real AI co-pilot. I don't need it to do the all the writing for me, just like I don't need Claude Code to do all the code for me. I want to work with it. I want a writing partner that acts like a full writing team on-call 24X7: proofreading, fact-checking, and running deep research in the background while I focus on the hard parts. I'm tired of cutting and pasting between a dozen tools so I started writing this thing. But won't the big guys just build something like this? Sure. But it will just bolt your ass into their ecosystem. Google Docs will force Gemini on you. Whatever office suite OpenAI pumps out will only use GPT. I want to use any model. Open or closed. They're commodities. The app is the thing. I want the best tool for the job, GPT-5, Kimi, Qwen, Claude, whatever comes tomorrow. I want a fluid, flexible workspace. I'm building this thing for people who've got critical thinking and who build, who don't want to outsource every damn thing to the machine. So if that's you and you believe this should exist, I really need your vote. Tell me to build it and I'll go all-in and make it a reality. Thanks for giving me a moment of your time.

Daniel Jeffries

21,386 просмотров • 1 год назад

please stop asking about him in chat 🙏🫩 "just for the sake of people not asking all the time in chat, we're no longer friends. i think it was obvious, it's been about 2 and a half years since we've interacted"
1:34

please stop asking about him in chat 🙏🫩 "just for the sake of people not asking all the time in chat, we're no longer friends. i think it was obvious, it's been about 2 and a half years since we've interacted"

bella 🗡

858,064 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Kevin Costner said he didn’t want to speak publicly after Whitney Houston died because he felt their relationship was “just a movie.” Kevin Costner: What happened was, it was a thing I didn't want to do. When Whitney passed, the microphone was going around for a, for a week, that everybody getting on TV talking about her. And I'm thinking, "Jesus, the last thing I want to do is get on a radio and talk about her." Uh, after all, it was just a movie really. And, but there was this weird thing that I didn't take into consideration. I think sometimes, maybe you and I can miss what the real momentum is, that we don't really gauge it because we either intellectually dismiss it or we just don't care, but people wanted to hear what I had to say about her, which baffled me. It was a, it was a make-believe relationship we had. And so I avoided it.
2:49

Kevin Costner said he didn’t want to speak publicly after Whitney Houston died because he felt their relationship was “just a movie.” Kevin Costner: What happened was, it was a thing I didn't want to do. When Whitney passed, the microphone was going around for a, for a week, that everybody getting on TV talking about her. And I'm thinking, "Jesus, the last thing I want to do is get on a radio and talk about her." Uh, after all, it was just a movie really. And, but there was this weird thing that I didn't take into consideration. I think sometimes, maybe you and I can miss what the real momentum is, that we don't really gauge it because we either intellectually dismiss it or we just don't care, but people wanted to hear what I had to say about her, which baffled me. It was a, it was a make-believe relationship we had. And so I avoided it.

Ruzy.hl

4,369,461 просмотров • 1 месяц назад