正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "I was inside OpenAI when GPT learned to code. I watched it happen in real time Ilya said: 'the models just want to learn.' I listened and I became enlightened then I left with 7 people and built Claude. not because OpenAI was wrong -...

256,609 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

19 条评论

风雪漫千山 的头像
风雪漫千山3 个月前

只要故事讲得足够动听, 分赃不均都能包装得如此神圣啊!

Gabe 的头像
Gabe3 个月前

"Don't get in the way" "Delete your IDE" "Pay more - your usage ran out for running a simple loop" "You are not eligible to use this model" "I'm just a dick rider here to sell a shitty model that does the job you should be doing yourself"

CoolBreeze-cn 的头像
CoolBreeze-cn3 个月前

这个傻逼越看越恶心。

Trustmebro 的头像
Trustmebro3 个月前

This guy is a greedy Bug eater.

Clustz News • AI | Tech | World | Gaming | More 的头像
Clustz News • AI | Tech | World | Gaming | More3 个月前

People underestimate how much the edge now comes from speed of trying, not “knowing AI.” But 700 experiments only matter if you know what to test. Isn’t taste becoming the real moat now?

wladwtf 的头像
wladwtf3 个月前

Anthropic approach seems really promising

Pearl AI 的头像
Pearl AI3 个月前

Inspiring message, but no model replaces execution.

FW 的头像
FW3 个月前

Talks a lot, says very little

Dipanshu Kushwaha 的头像
Dipanshu Kushwaha3 个月前

That’s awesome—believing in the shift and starting Claude shows real vision. Congrats on riding the AI wave and building something meaningful. Here's to continued breakthroughs.

AI Mastery Guide 的头像
AI Mastery Guide3 个月前

700 experiments in 2 nights finding what took 20 years to miss is kind of nuts.

dunik 的头像
dunik3 个月前

the real AI advantage isn’t knowing more it’s running more experiments than everyone else.

Adel Bucetta 的头像
Adel Bucetta3 个月前

the honest answer is that the most valuable insights often come from watching failures, not successes. and sometimes you just have to leave and build something new instead of trying to fix what's already broken

Cassian Walker 的头像
Cassian Walker3 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: Starting July 1, a new California law mandates that streaming platforms must ensure advertisements do not exceed the volume level of the primary content being watched, finally addressing long-standing viewer complaints about jarring commercial audio.

安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB 的头像
安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB3 个月前

这段有点像 AI 版创业神话了

Monk 的头像
Monk3 个月前

And here I am asking all four of them to rearrange and excel using a model of data from another excel and all four of them suck. Lies

🇮🇱 Arys 的头像
🇮🇱 Arys3 个月前

Claude can only learn what's provided to it.

Pixel 的头像
Pixel3 个月前

Dario Amodei did not write this but 40,000 people will quote it like he did that's a separate and more interesting AI story

SWAPT 的头像
SWAPT3 个月前

Yeah very wow!!!! But we can't use. So for what that's all? Ok dream.. Goodnight

~/aimi 的头像
~/aimi3 个月前

700 experiments in 2 nights thats search not research

相关视频

For months, I've been quietly building a prototype of something just because I want it to exist. Papyrus is a word processor, editor, proofreader, fact-checker, deep researcher, brainstorming partner, all in one. It takes your rough draft and helps you skip three revisions. Now I'm considering pivoting my whole team to build it out, but first, I need your vote. You email is your vote. LINK IN COMMENTS. I don't even care if you use some email you never look at and just use for sign ups. To me one email is one vote and says, go ahead and build this damn thing out and make it awesome. I built it because today's apps are the bloated dial-ups of writing (Word, GDocs). They've got a hundred freaking buttons I don't need and bury the ones I do need. Or they're AI marketing slop toys that promise to read my mind and pump out garbage. They just don't get the real work of writing and they don't get me. I want a clean, focused space with a real AI co-pilot. I don't need it to do the all the writing for me, just like I don't need Claude Code to do all the code for me. I want to work with it. I want a writing partner that acts like a full writing team on-call 24X7: proofreading, fact-checking, and running deep research in the background while I focus on the hard parts. I'm tired of cutting and pasting between a dozen tools so I started writing this thing. But won't the big guys just build something like this? Sure. But it will just bolt your ass into their ecosystem. Google Docs will force Gemini on you. Whatever office suite OpenAI pumps out will only use GPT. I want to use any model. Open or closed. They're commodities. The app is the thing. I want the best tool for the job, GPT-5, Kimi, Qwen, Claude, whatever comes tomorrow. I want a fluid, flexible workspace. I'm building this thing for people who've got critical thinking and who build, who don't want to outsource every damn thing to the machine. So if that's you and you believe this should exist, I really need your vote. Tell me to build it and I'll go all-in and make it a reality. Thanks for giving me a moment of your time.

Daniel Jeffries

21,386 次观看 • 1 年前