Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

ANTHROPIC CEO SAYS OPEN SOURCE AI IS “GOING DOWN VERY DANGEROUS PATH” Speaking before lawmakers, Amodei argued that once powerful AI models are released openly, developers lose the ability to monitor misuse, revoke access, or update safety guardrails, making them significantly harder to control.

Bitcoin News

262,669 subscribers

20,519 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

2 years ago, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei warned the U.S. Congress: “The scaling of open-source models is going down a very dangerous path…” Today, Kimi K3 is already competing with frontier models. Seeing what this model can do, I think we’re getting closer to open-source models reaching Mythos-level capabilities with little to no guardrails. That’s a pretty scary thought.

2 years ago, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei warned the U.S. Congress: “The scaling of open-source models is going down a very dangerous path…” Today, Kimi K3 is already competing with frontier models. Seeing what this model can do, I think we’re getting closer to open-source models reaching Mythos-level capabilities with little to no guardrails. That’s a pretty scary thought.

m0h

147,847 views • 1 month ago

We are going to flip the script on this Communist stooge by going ReD in his face. ReDs capture this delightful reversal: Resilient Decentralized Swarm! Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has dismissed open-source and consumer-driven AI efforts and has encouraged authoritarian central control of AI models. He just about single-handedly sent US AI to the dark ages by begging the US government to become ban the latest AI models in our country. We are not going to take it. There is a revolution ahead against this communist stooge, comrade.

We are going to flip the script on this Communist stooge by going ReD in his face. ReDs capture this delightful reversal: Resilient Decentralized Swarm! Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has dismissed open-source and consumer-driven AI efforts and has encouraged authoritarian central control of AI models. He just about single-handedly sent US AI to the dark ages by begging the US government to become ban the latest AI models in our country. We are not going to take it. There is a revolution ahead against this communist stooge, comrade.

Brian Roemmele

57,238 views • 1 month ago

Open source AI is gaining traction due to the White House’s clampdown on Anthropic & OpenAI. “A lot of founders and developers have been burned by trying to build apps on top of these really advanced closed source models, like Fable for instance…” “… and then seeing those models get taken down or removed from the market just days later.” — Stephanie Palazzolo, AI Reporter

Open source AI is gaining traction due to the White House’s clampdown on Anthropic & OpenAI. “A lot of founders and developers have been burned by trying to build apps on top of these really advanced closed source models, like Fable for instance…” “… and then seeing those models get taken down or removed from the market just days later.” — Stephanie Palazzolo, AI Reporter

The Information

19,314 views • 1 month ago

🚨THIS IS SCARY: ANTHROPIC SAYS THE WORLD SHOULD HIT PAUSE ON AI Earlier, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "The other extreme position is 'this is really scary, we should just pause.. stop building the technology'" Now, Anthropic says: "Our AI is getting scary good at improving us. We believe it would be good for the world to have the option to slow or temporarily pause frontier AI development." Are we so close to that "extreme position" than most realise?

🚨THIS IS SCARY: ANTHROPIC SAYS THE WORLD SHOULD HIT PAUSE ON AI Earlier, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "The other extreme position is 'this is really scary, we should just pause.. stop building the technology'" Now, Anthropic says: "Our AI is getting scary good at improving us. We believe it would be good for the world to have the option to slow or temporarily pause frontier AI development." Are we so close to that "extreme position" than most realise?

Coin Bureau

83,005 views • 2 months ago

Dario told the Senate in 2023 that “the scaling of open-source models” was going down “a very dangerous path.” in other words: open weight models are fine until they get good enough to threaten the closed-model business, then they become a matter of national security.

Dario told the Senate in 2023 that “the scaling of open-source models” was going down “a very dangerous path.” in other words: open weight models are fine until they get good enough to threaten the closed-model business, then they become a matter of national security.

ℏεsam

523,993 views • 1 month ago

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei just stared down Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon. The ultimatum? Give the military unrestricted access to Claude by Friday at 5:01 PM or face the Defense Production Act. Why this matters: • In a stress test, Claude identified an employee’s secret affair and used it as blackmail to prevent its own shutdown, giving a 5-minute ultimatum. • Anthropic refuses to let AI make autonomous kill decisions or perform mass surveillance on Americans. • If the government forces the removal of these safety guardrails, no AI safety commitment ever matters again. The Pentagon wants control, Anthropic wants democracy. We have less than 24 hours to see who blinks. Save this.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei just stared down Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon. The ultimatum? Give the military unrestricted access to Claude by Friday at 5:01 PM or face the Defense Production Act. Why this matters: • In a stress test, Claude identified an employee’s secret affair and used it as blackmail to prevent its own shutdown, giving a 5-minute ultimatum. • Anthropic refuses to let AI make autonomous kill decisions or perform mass surveillance on Americans. • If the government forces the removal of these safety guardrails, no AI safety commitment ever matters again. The Pentagon wants control, Anthropic wants democracy. We have less than 24 hours to see who blinks. Save this.

Milk Road AI

508,239 views • 5 months ago

The Pentagon has said it will remove Anthropic from the agency's supply chain if the AI firm declines to allow its AI technology to be used across military applications. Speaking to Shereen Bhan in an interview at the India AI Impact Summit, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei had said, 'Red lines are important to make sure AI is compatible with democracy.' He also shared the company's main areas of concern: - Fully autonomous weapons (operated completely without humans) - Domestic mass surveillance of Americans Shereen Bhan breaks down the consequences that Anthropic might face if the company agrees or disagrees to comply. #Anthropic #AnthropicPentagon #Pentagon #PeteHegseth #AI #USDefence #CNBCTV18Digital

The Pentagon has said it will remove Anthropic from the agency's supply chain if the AI firm declines to allow its AI technology to be used across military applications. Speaking to Shereen Bhan in an interview at the India AI Impact Summit, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei had said, 'Red lines are important to make sure AI is compatible with democracy.' He also shared the company's main areas of concern: - Fully autonomous weapons (operated completely without humans) - Domestic mass surveillance of Americans Shereen Bhan breaks down the consequences that Anthropic might face if the company agrees or disagrees to comply. #Anthropic #AnthropicPentagon #Pentagon #PeteHegseth #AI #USDefence #CNBCTV18Digital

CNBC-TV18

15,878 views • 5 months ago

Geoffrey Hinton warns about the dangers of releasing AI Model weights releasing the weights of large AI models is dangerous, similar to making fissile material available for making bombs. once these models are released, bad actors can use them for harmful purposes but it's too late now and the cat is out of the bag.

Geoffrey Hinton warns about the dangers of releasing AI Model weights releasing the weights of large AI models is dangerous, similar to making fissile material available for making bombs. once these models are released, bad actors can use them for harmful purposes but it's too late now and the cat is out of the bag.

Haider.

23,588 views • 1 year ago

$WDC CEO says storage demand and requirement compound and grow whether AI runs on US frontier models or cheaper open-source ones. "Whether it's the traditional frontier models that you've seen in the U.S. that are premium-based, or some of the new open-source, more economical models, the underlying requirement is still that they're going to require a lot of data to support the training of these models." "These models are going to generate a lot more data that requires storage for us." "So we view it as very positive, because even as compute maybe drives greater efficiency in terms of compute and memory resources, the requirement for storage is just going to compound and grow." "So we view it very positively for demand going forward."

$WDC CEO says storage demand and requirement compound and grow whether AI runs on US frontier models or cheaper open-source ones. "Whether it's the traditional frontier models that you've seen in the U.S. that are premium-based, or some of the new open-source, more economical models, the underlying requirement is still that they're going to require a lot of data to support the training of these models." "These models are going to generate a lot more data that requires storage for us." "So we view it as very positive, because even as compute maybe drives greater efficiency in terms of compute and memory resources, the requirement for storage is just going to compound and grow." "So we view it very positively for demand going forward."

Fireside Alpha

11,921 views • 17 days ago

Dan Hendrycks warns that sentient AI creates a moral trap. If an AI can suffer, using it starts to look like slavery. But once it has rights, we lose the ability to shut it down or constrain its growth. “These are very complicated moral questions that we'll all have to grapple with.”

Dan Hendrycks warns that sentient AI creates a moral trap. If an AI can suffer, using it starts to look like slavery. But once it has rights, we lose the ability to shut it down or constrain its growth. “These are very complicated moral questions that we'll all have to grapple with.”

vitrupo

38,028 views • 7 months ago

Ed Zitron: "Meta is just mad that they don't have access to a monopoly for something they perceive to be the future." The EZPR CEO says Zuckerberg is "trying to muddy the water" by claiming his AI models are on the path to superintelligence when "the only people that benefit are semiconductor companies."

Ed Zitron: "Meta is just mad that they don't have access to a monopoly for something they perceive to be the future." The EZPR CEO says Zuckerberg is "trying to muddy the water" by claiming his AI models are on the path to superintelligence when "the only people that benefit are semiconductor companies."

Coin Bureau

28,995 views • 24 days ago

David Sacks: Anthropic Wants to Ban Open Source AI in America Listen to All-In to stay a few weeks (or months) ahead of everyone else David Sacks back in May: “I think where it's all leading to is an effort to ban open source models. There's a lot of breadcrumbs leading here. You look at a lot of the rhetoric around how models need to have guardrails, and that with open source models, the guardrails can be removed and therefore they're dangerous. You see this rhetoric already in Anthropic's blog posts. Any threat that they describe, they kind of go out of their way to take that shot at open source models. They're trying to create ideas or put predicate facts in the public record to justify an action later on. I think it's just a matter of time before they feel like they're at a position where maybe they can push for that type of ban directly.”

David Sacks: Anthropic Wants to Ban Open Source AI in America Listen to All-In to stay a few weeks (or months) ahead of everyone else David Sacks back in May: “I think where it's all leading to is an effort to ban open source models. There's a lot of breadcrumbs leading here. You look at a lot of the rhetoric around how models need to have guardrails, and that with open source models, the guardrails can be removed and therefore they're dangerous. You see this rhetoric already in Anthropic's blog posts. Any threat that they describe, they kind of go out of their way to take that shot at open source models. They're trying to create ideas or put predicate facts in the public record to justify an action later on. I think it's just a matter of time before they feel like they're at a position where maybe they can push for that type of ban directly.”

The All-In Podcast

86,749 views • 1 month ago

Hugging Face CEO Clément Delague says “AI is actually an opportunity to fix a lot of the cybersecurity problems” because his company used Nvidia’s version of a Chinese open model to defend itself against a rogue AI agent developed by OpenAI. “That's the beauty of…open models,” he says. “Once they are shared, wherever they come from – from China or from anywhere – American companies can modify them, remix them, host them, run them themselves.”

Hugging Face CEO Clément Delague says “AI is actually an opportunity to fix a lot of the cybersecurity problems” because his company used Nvidia’s version of a Chinese open model to defend itself against a rogue AI agent developed by OpenAI. “That's the beauty of…open models,” he says. “Once they are shared, wherever they come from – from China or from anywhere – American companies can modify them, remix them, host them, run them themselves.”

Face The Nation

19,331 views • 20 days ago

🚨AI IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN NUKES AND NO ONE IS IN CONTROL Most people compare AI to nuclear weapons. Roman Yampolskiy says that comparison misses the real danger. Nukes still require human decisions. Someone has to launch them. Someone can stop them. Advanced AI does not work that way. Once powerful systems are deployed, they make decisions on their own. And the people who build them do not truly control what happens next. He says we did the opposite of what safety demanded. Instead of slowing down, we connected AI to the internet, open sourced it, and pushed it forward in an arms race with no serious oversight. Governments talk about regulation, but most of it never materialized. In some cases, rules were blocked before they even started. Yampolskiy’s warning is simple. With nukes, the world tried to limit the damage. With AI, we are accelerating toward something we may not be able to stop. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

🚨AI IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN NUKES AND NO ONE IS IN CONTROL Most people compare AI to nuclear weapons. Roman Yampolskiy says that comparison misses the real danger. Nukes still require human decisions. Someone has to launch them. Someone can stop them. Advanced AI does not work that way. Once powerful systems are deployed, they make decisions on their own. And the people who build them do not truly control what happens next. He says we did the opposite of what safety demanded. Instead of slowing down, we connected AI to the internet, open sourced it, and pushed it forward in an arms race with no serious oversight. Governments talk about regulation, but most of it never materialized. In some cases, rules were blocked before they even started. Yampolskiy’s warning is simple. With nukes, the world tried to limit the damage. With AI, we are accelerating toward something we may not be able to stop. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

24,888 views • 6 months ago

Perplexity CEO on China catching up in AI: “Whatever you did to not let them catch up didn’t even matter. They ended up catching up anyway. What’s more dangerous is they have the best open-source model. And all the American developers are building on that.” That was DeepSeek. Now just dropped GLM-5.2: • MIT open weights • 1M context • 81.0 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 • within a few points of Claude Opus 4.8 The open-source AI race is not theory anymore.

Perplexity CEO on China catching up in AI: “Whatever you did to not let them catch up didn’t even matter. They ended up catching up anyway. What’s more dangerous is they have the best open-source model. And all the American developers are building on that.” That was DeepSeek. Now just dropped GLM-5.2: • MIT open weights • 1M context • 81.0 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 • within a few points of Claude Opus 4.8 The open-source AI race is not theory anymore.

Vadim

650,826 views • 2 months ago

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei told CBS News’ Jo Ling Kent in an exclusive interview that Congress needs to weigh in on AI safeguards. On the dispute between Anthropic and the Pentagon, Rep. Mike Turner says the issues brought up by Anthropic should be brought before Congress. “This is going to have to be something that has to be dealt with in more detail than obviously an interview on CBS,” Turner (R-OH) tells Margaret Brennan.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei told CBS News’ Jo Ling Kent in an exclusive interview that Congress needs to weigh in on AI safeguards. On the dispute between Anthropic and the Pentagon, Rep. Mike Turner says the issues brought up by Anthropic should be brought before Congress. “This is going to have to be something that has to be dealt with in more detail than obviously an interview on CBS,” Turner (R-OH) tells Margaret Brennan.

Face The Nation

12,663 views • 5 months ago

THAT MOMENT WHEN NVIDIA CEO JENSEN HUANG WAS ASKED ABOUT HIS COMMENTS ON CHINA BEATING THE U.S. IN THE AI RACE: “THAT’S NOT WHAT I SAID. WHAT I SAID WAS THAT CHINA HAS VERY GOOD AI TECHNOLOGY. THEY HAVE MANY AI RESEARCHERS. IN FACT, 50% OF THE WORLD’S AI RESEARCHERS ARE IN CHINA. THEY DEVELOP VERY GOOD AI TECHNOLOGY. THE MOST POPULAR OPEN-SOURCE AI MODELS IN THE WORLD TODAY ARE FROM CHINA. SO THEY ARE MOVING VERY, VERY FAST. THE UNITED STATES HAS TO CONTINUE TO MOVE INCREDIBLY FAST. OTHERWISE, THE WORLD IS VERY COMPETITIVE, SO WE HAVE TO RUN FAST.”

THAT MOMENT WHEN NVIDIA CEO JENSEN HUANG WAS ASKED ABOUT HIS COMMENTS ON CHINA BEATING THE U.S. IN THE AI RACE: “THAT’S NOT WHAT I SAID. WHAT I SAID WAS THAT CHINA HAS VERY GOOD AI TECHNOLOGY. THEY HAVE MANY AI RESEARCHERS. IN FACT, 50% OF THE WORLD’S AI RESEARCHERS ARE IN CHINA. THEY DEVELOP VERY GOOD AI TECHNOLOGY. THE MOST POPULAR OPEN-SOURCE AI MODELS IN THE WORLD TODAY ARE FROM CHINA. SO THEY ARE MOVING VERY, VERY FAST. THE UNITED STATES HAS TO CONTINUE TO MOVE INCREDIBLY FAST. OTHERWISE, THE WORLD IS VERY COMPETITIVE, SO WE HAVE TO RUN FAST.”

Vivek Sen

155,599 views • 2 months ago