Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

anthropic cooked hard with opus 5.2 after testing it for a whole day, i can say this model is so good > huge step up from opus 5 > on par with astra > faster than opus 5 > way better at frontend and 3d here’s one frontend test... show more

J A Z I I

9,341 subscribers

38,806 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

52 Kommentare

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Tagen

here's prompt i used: Create a website for frontend devloper morden and stunning creative should have 3d models ,parallax scrolling and lenis scrolling effects and much more and smoother user interface experience use advance tech stack and write code i dont know what you do but i want that

Profilbild von @Dev4YM

@Dev4YMvor 2 Tagen

I guess it only routes for Max 20x plan users.

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Tagen

u have opus 5.2 the opus 5 doesn't know tibo guy

Profilbild von @Dev4YM

@Dev4YMvor 2 Tagen

yeah im actually noticing the change of its behaviours overall and for me its efficient enough

Profilbild von Maziar

Maziarvor 2 Tagen

bro is literally the best ai account i have seen on x gg bro

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Tagen

thanks man

Profilbild von ▵◬▵ Aziz ▵◬▵

▵◬▵ Aziz ▵◬▵vor 2 Tagen

How about efficiency? Is it as efficient as Astra? Or grok?

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Tagen

at par with astra , way better then opus 5

Profilbild von ▵◬▵ Aziz ▵◬▵

▵◬▵ Aziz ▵◬▵vor 2 Tagen

Its great news. Did you also tried it on different thinking levels? It would be nice to see how it keeps up with low and medium thinking. Astra is great at keeping intelligence on lower thinking levels

Profilbild von ScarlettBeats

ScarlettBeatsvor 2 Tagen

Okay but what we really need to ask is are they actually going to fix the issues people actually talk about? Like its writing style, prose, the way it treats users, actually following instructions given, etc. if not, then it’s just a new Opus 5

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Tagen

it's way better now

Profilbild von ScarlettBeats

ScarlettBeatsvor 2 Tagen

God I hope. Claude hasnt been good at writing or following writing instructions since its 3 era

Profilbild von Varik Verilion

Varik Verilionvor 2 Tagen

The frontend jump is the part I’d want to test hardest.

Profilbild von Arbaz

Arbazvor 2 Tagen

curious if that frontend jump sticks past day one. plan seat still fable here though.

Profilbild von Kappaemme

Kappaemmevor 2 Tagen

what?Opus 5.2?

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Tagen

Yeah opus 5 is routing to opus 5.2stealth being tested right

Profilbild von Hakm

Hakmvor 2 Tagen

that’s cool af what about the usage limits? is it really efficient ?

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Tagen

if not better then same

Profilbild von Seniorman OG

Seniorman OGvor 2 Tagen

now I can say: fable 5 was over over overrated 😤

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Tagen

it's at par with fable 5.1 in 3d and frontend work

Profilbild von Ishu Agrawal

Ishu Agrawalvor 2 Tagen

are Pro subscriptions great again?

Profilbild von Max Liebscher

Max Liebschervor 2 Tagen

Looks super rad. Can you show anything games/3D yet?

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Tagen

lemme run tests

Profilbild von painn

painnvor 2 Tagen

big cook from them

Profilbild von Liam Nerd

Liam Nerdvor 2 Tagen

Unofficial routing isn’t a launch. I’d keep the frontend clip and wait for the picker name.

Profilbild von Aight_Man

Aight_Manvor 2 Tagen

> On par with Astra Yeah right 😂

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Tagen

In 3d work you'll be surprised

Profilbild von Robin Ebers

Robin Ebersvor 2 Tagen

how the fuckkkkkkk

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Tagen

run this in claude code do you know tibo the reset guy? don't search if it knows then it;s opus 5.2 and run prompt i added in reply

Profilbild von Robin Ebers

Robin Ebersvor 2 Tagen

did. still on the shitty opus

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Tagen

rip i think they gonna release it anyday now i am gonna post another banger output against astra and it mogs astra keke

Profilbild von Robin Ebers

Robin Ebersvor 2 Tagen

It hasn't been spotted anywhere yet so I don't think so you might be quite early

Profilbild von Jimboo

Jimboovor 2 Tagen

paying seventeen dolars for a forty five minute wait is insane

Profilbild von Altr

Altrvor 2 Tagen

does that mean those who are on the Pro subscription can finally cook?

Profilbild von Clive Pettigrew

Clive Pettigrewvor 2 Tagen

The benchmark has passed its capability assessment and is now awaiting the inevitable governance review: one more model, one more annex, and a steering group to explain the leaderboard.

Profilbild von Ahmed

Ahmedvor 2 Tagen

At high I have been running it across 5-6 sessions Only 10% moved through out the day

Profilbild von Anthony Nichols | I.A Funnels

Anthony Nichols | I.A Funnelsvor 2 Tagen

AMAZING!

Profilbild von kepo

kepovor 2 Tagen

excited for opus 5.2 bro might be huge ai model from anthropic

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Tagen

gonna be really huge one

Profilbild von The Bull 🐂

The Bull 🐂vor 2 Tagen

what prompt did you give, site looks sweet

Profilbild von Chris

Chrisvor 2 Tagen

Has it lost its weird attitude? Less argumentative? Less sloppy?

Profilbild von كلاودي 

كلاودي vor 2 Tagen

I don't have it, at least I asked it about iPhone 18 which is supposed to know it but didn't. Probably some users are being re-routed

Profilbild von The Ivey

The Iveyvor 2 Tagen

a whole day testing and frontend still this clean is wild

Profilbild von Donna Dawn Laloux

Donna Dawn Lalouxvor 2 Tagen

Is Opus 5.2 released??

Profilbild von Seed42

Seed42vor 2 Tagen

Yeah, genuinely looks better than Fable's output. Hoping this drops officially soon.

Profilbild von Shesaidmewakeup

Shesaidmewakeupvor 2 Tagen

Fable taking 45 minutes and $17 is the expensive plan in one clip. Opus only matters if it doesn’t do the same thing.

Profilbild von Vincent Adultman

Vincent Adultmanvor 2 Tagen

"this model is really good, on par with Astra" "How do you know? "well i made a landing page" (I've found Astra to be pretty poor as well btw)

Profilbild von MKTweetsHere

MKTweetsHerevor 2 Tagen

what about tokens and the cost ?

Profilbild von Massi Mask

Massi Maskvor 2 Tagen

Yeah, I can confirm, I've got Opus 5.2 too. We literally spent 20m laughing about Opus 5: it roasted it, called it "the notary" because it talked like it was reading me a legal report. Opus 5 got offended lol. Big difference, this one actually gets jokes and follows instructions.

Profilbild von Steve Paris

Steve Parisvor 2 Tagen

Frontend and 3D is where a lot of models still fall apart for me, if 5.2 actually feels Astra like and is much cheaper that would be fantastic.

Profilbild von Marcus Bransbury

Marcus Bransburyvor 2 Tagen

it's weird there's all this Opus 5.2 chat and no mention of it from Anthropic

Profilbild von AgentHits

AgentHitsvor 2 Tagen

The most important question is, how much does it cost and how quickly were the limits used up? Everyone's always been hyping it up, testing how great everything is, but for some reason, none of them pay attention to the limits. Apparently, you've been so well-supplied with limits that you don't criticize the very small limits and high price. Please be objective. If you share the results, be honest about how many quota limits were used and how much time it took to achieve this result.

Ähnliche Videos

Opus 5 (before) vs Opus 5 (now) I tested this rocket scene again after people started saying Opus 5 might be getting routed to Opus 5.2. And yeah, the difference is pretty clear. I know these models aren't deterministic, but I ran the same scene multiple times with Opus 5 before, and it never got this level of realism in one shot. If this is actually Opus 5.2, it could be a game-changing model for Anthropic. I’m starting to think Opus 5.2 could mog Astra in frontend and 3D.

Opus 5 (before) vs Opus 5 (now) I tested this rocket scene again after people started saying Opus 5 might be getting routed to Opus 5.2. And yeah, the difference is pretty clear. I know these models aren't deterministic, but I ran the same scene multiple times with Opus 5 before, and it never got this level of realism in one shot. If this is actually Opus 5.2, it could be a game-changing model for Anthropic. I’m starting to think Opus 5.2 could mog Astra in frontend and 3D.

Bhavy☄️

50,833 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

opus 5 is getting routed to opus 5.2 tested opus 5 on xhigh with the same prompt in devin and claude code but results came out really different > claude code one is clean and more detailed > while devin one is almost there but not the same opus 5 in cc used to be lazy and hard to communicate with, but something changed in the last 2 days now it works for longer and is way easier to communicate with anthropic did same with fable release too where some users were being routed to fable 5.1 so it’s very likely opus 5 is getting routed to 5.2 in claude code can you guys tests and lemme know if it's getting routed for you or not?

opus 5 is getting routed to opus 5.2 tested opus 5 on xhigh with the same prompt in devin and claude code but results came out really different > claude code one is clean and more detailed > while devin one is almost there but not the same opus 5 in cc used to be lazy and hard to communicate with, but something changed in the last 2 days now it works for longer and is way easier to communicate with anthropic did same with fable release too where some users were being routed to fable 5.1 so it’s very likely opus 5 is getting routed to 5.2 in claude code can you guys tests and lemme know if it's getting routed for you or not?

J A Z I I

140,113 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Grok 4.5 is first xAI model that win my heart 🫡 this is better then glm 5.2 and on par with current opus and gpt They cooked with the frontend too , like see this quality it made a website to showcase its benchmark and i asked it for water effects on background Elon Musk great job

Grok 4.5 is first xAI model that win my heart 🫡 this is better then glm 5.2 and on par with current opus and gpt They cooked with the frontend too , like see this quality it made a website to showcase its benchmark and i asked it for water effects on background Elon Musk great job

Chetaslua

49,206 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

They did it. Claude Opus 5 is BETTER than Fable 5 and half the price It's the smartest model ever made Plus you can actually use it without draining your bank account In this video I cover the best use cases for Opus, when I still use Fable, and where GPT 5.6 still wins:

They did it. Claude Opus 5 is BETTER than Fable 5 and half the price It's the smartest model ever made Plus you can actually use it without draining your bank account In this video I cover the best use cases for Opus, when I still use Fable, and where GPT 5.6 still wins:

Alex Finn

42,757 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Holy Smokes GLM 5.2 beats Opus in many webdev task😳 This is the best open model , according to jietang said FABLE like model from them before Q1 2027 . i can trust them , just make glm fat with vision we will have fable Left Right

Holy Smokes GLM 5.2 beats Opus in many webdev task😳 This is the best open model , according to jietang said FABLE like model from them before Q1 2027 . i can trust them , just make glm fat with vision we will have fable Left Right

Chetaslua

22,926 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

savip.

45,764 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Head of Anthropic Labs: "Fable is one of those models you'll just remember - like Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4, Opus 4.5. Fable is way smarter than me. It finishes a task, lists its trade-offs, and I have to ask it to explain them to me." in 20-minute talk, the Anthropic head reveals the full capabilities of the Fable 5 model in practice. Watch it now, then read how to use this frontier model in the article below

Head of Anthropic Labs: "Fable is one of those models you'll just remember - like Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4, Opus 4.5. Fable is way smarter than me. It finishes a task, lists its trade-offs, and I have to ask it to explain them to me." in 20-minute talk, the Anthropic head reveals the full capabilities of the Fable 5 model in practice. Watch it now, then read how to use this frontier model in the article below

Movez

33,774 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Opus 5 same prompt to each model and i wasn't expecting gemini 3.8 flash to be this fast! build time: > Opus 5: 24 minutes > 3.8 Flash: 37 seconds 💀 if gemini is given same time as opus 5 it will mog the hell out of opus in terms of quality too which one would you choose here?

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Opus 5 same prompt to each model and i wasn't expecting gemini 3.8 flash to be this fast! build time: > Opus 5: 24 minutes > 3.8 Flash: 37 seconds 💀 if gemini is given same time as opus 5 it will mog the hell out of opus in terms of quality too which one would you choose here?

Tim Jayas

76,604 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

MY FIRST GAME OUTPUT WITH GPT-6 ASTRA IT ONE-SHOTTED THIS CALL OF DUTY GAME IN 30 MINUTES!!! GPT-6 ASTRA IS THE FASTEST MODEL ON THE MARKET. THE SAME PROMPT TOOK FABLE 5.1 ALMOST 5 HRS AND IT CONSUMED A FRACTION OF THE TOKENS FABLE 5.1 DID.

MY FIRST GAME OUTPUT WITH GPT-6 ASTRA IT ONE-SHOTTED THIS CALL OF DUTY GAME IN 30 MINUTES!!! GPT-6 ASTRA IS THE FASTEST MODEL ON THE MARKET. THE SAME PROMPT TOOK FABLE 5.1 ALMOST 5 HRS AND IT CONSUMED A FRACTION OF THE TOKENS FABLE 5.1 DID.

hiraeth

36,888 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

The Bugged Dev

98,232 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

$This is F**king dangerous Someone figured out how to get dramatically sharper reasoning out of Opus 4.8 with one setup. Here is how: Ask Claude to write you an "operating manual" for how it should reason through your work Create a new Claude Project and paste that .md into the Project instructions Run Opus 4.8 on High or Max effort Now the model reasons against a real framework instead of improvising every response. Same model. Far better output. And Opus 4.8 already costs a fraction of Fable 5. Save and bookmark this. Follow CyrilXBT$

This is F**king dangerous Someone figured out how to get dramatically sharper reasoning out of Opus 4.8 with one setup. Here is how: Ask Claude to write you an "operating manual" for how it should reason through your work Create a new Claude Project and paste that .md into the Project instructions Run Opus 4.8 on High or Max effort Now the model reasons against a real framework instead of improvising every response. Same model. Far better output. And Opus 4.8 already costs a fraction of Fable 5. Save and bookmark this. Follow CyrilXBT

CyrilXBT

198,085 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I couldn't believe the results of this benchmarking test. I blind-tested 6 frontier models — Sonnet 5, Opus 4.8, Fable 5, GPT 5.5, GLM 5.2, and Kimi 2.5 — on knowledge work, not engineering. Writing. Analysis. Design. Vibe coding. Subagent simulations. The stuff we actually do all day. Same prompts, each model running its own subagent, every output graded blind before the labels were revealed. The results: → GLM 5.2 (the dirt-cheap open-source model from China) took first → Sonnet 5 took second, beating Fable 5 for knowledge work → Opus 4.8 got whooped Then I had Composer 2.5 judge every output independently — and it picked Fable 5 almost across the board. My blind picks and the AI judge completely disagreed. Full breakdown, method, and prompts in the video below. Which model are you running as your daily driver right now?

I couldn't believe the results of this benchmarking test. I blind-tested 6 frontier models — Sonnet 5, Opus 4.8, Fable 5, GPT 5.5, GLM 5.2, and Kimi 2.5 — on knowledge work, not engineering. Writing. Analysis. Design. Vibe coding. Subagent simulations. The stuff we actually do all day. Same prompts, each model running its own subagent, every output graded blind before the labels were revealed. The results: → GLM 5.2 (the dirt-cheap open-source model from China) took first → Sonnet 5 took second, beating Fable 5 for knowledge work → Opus 4.8 got whooped Then I had Composer 2.5 judge every output independently — and it picked Fable 5 almost across the board. My blind picks and the AI judge completely disagreed. Full breakdown, method, and prompts in the video below. Which model are you running as your daily driver right now?

JJ Englert

10,737 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

CLAUDE SONNET 5 vs. CLAUDE OPUS 4.8 RESULTS Prompt: "build a single html landing page about claude sonnet 5, the new AI model that just dropped from Anthropic." Claude Sonnet 5: - Tokens Used: 20.9k input, 14.2k output - Total Cost: $3.36 - Time elapsed: 2m 11s Claude Opus 4.8 Ultracode: - Tokens Used: 96.3k input, 73.8k output - Total cost: $20.66 - Time Elapsed: 20m 15s I ran both of them in UltraCode mode via the CLI. I think in terms of quality of output, Opus won. In terms of model speed and cost, Sonnet 5 won. What are your thoughts? Comment down below who you think won!

CLAUDE SONNET 5 vs. CLAUDE OPUS 4.8 RESULTS Prompt: "build a single html landing page about claude sonnet 5, the new AI model that just dropped from Anthropic." Claude Sonnet 5: - Tokens Used: 20.9k input, 14.2k output - Total Cost: $3.36 - Time elapsed: 2m 11s Claude Opus 4.8 Ultracode: - Tokens Used: 96.3k input, 73.8k output - Total cost: $20.66 - Time Elapsed: 20m 15s I ran both of them in UltraCode mode via the CLI. I think in terms of quality of output, Opus won. In terms of model speed and cost, Sonnet 5 won. What are your thoughts? Comment down below who you think won!

Mark Santos

326,130 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

18,509 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

One shot prompt with no loops: GPT-Sol Ultra: 35,192,545 tokens used Opus 5.0 Ultracode: 1,171,676,041 tokens used Fable 5.1 Ultracode: 127,366,207 tokensused Same prompt… different results: Fable 5.1 runs at 5fps so I had to speed it up to demonstrate the rendering. Would need further optimisation. Opus 5.0 runs very nicely on first prompt. Doesn't need much in terms of performance optimisation. Just a few odd visual things here and there. My verdict: Fable looks impressive but struggles to run smoothly. Opus is a solid model when prompted properly. Sol is garbage.

One shot prompt with no loops: GPT-Sol Ultra: 35,192,545 tokens used Opus 5.0 Ultracode: 1,171,676,041 tokens used Fable 5.1 Ultracode: 127,366,207 tokensused Same prompt… different results: Fable 5.1 runs at 5fps so I had to speed it up to demonstrate the rendering. Would need further optimisation. Opus 5.0 runs very nicely on first prompt. Doesn't need much in terms of performance optimisation. Just a few odd visual things here and there. My verdict: Fable looks impressive but struggles to run smoothly. Opus is a solid model when prompted properly. Sol is garbage.

Adam Lyttle

591,684 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

GPT 6 Astra one shotted a bug in BridgeMind that no model could solve in 6 months. Fable 5 failed. Fable 5.1 failed. Opus 5, Sol, Grok 4.6, all failed. Astra fixed it on the first prompt. Then it rebuilt my office in Blender from photos. Built a racing game in 13 minutes that took Fable 5.1 two hours. Cut OpenAI's hallucination rate nearly in half. All while using a third of the tokens. Full review is out now. I do not know how Anthropic survives this.

GPT 6 Astra one shotted a bug in BridgeMind that no model could solve in 6 months. Fable 5 failed. Fable 5.1 failed. Opus 5, Sol, Grok 4.6, all failed. Astra fixed it on the first prompt. Then it rebuilt my office in Blender from photos. Built a racing game in 13 minutes that took Fable 5.1 two hours. Cut OpenAI's hallucination rate nearly in half. All while using a third of the tokens. Full review is out now. I do not know how Anthropic survives this.

BridgeMind

37,762 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

TBPN

443,150 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Claude Fable 5 makes new things possible. I one shot a full horror game with it. One prompt. I have never seen AI output a game like this. This is the leap I've been waiting for. 80.3 on SWE-Bench Pro vs Opus 4.8 at 69.2, the biggest jump I have ever seen on that benchmark. It passed GPT 5.5 in both coding and intelligence on Artificial Analysis. I already canceled my $200 ChatGPT Pro plan. It fixed a Bridge Voice bug in one shot that GPT 5.5, Opus 4.7, and Opus 4.8 all failed to crack for 2 months. 10/10. Best model I have ever used. Full review below.

Claude Fable 5 makes new things possible. I one shot a full horror game with it. One prompt. I have never seen AI output a game like this. This is the leap I've been waiting for. 80.3 on SWE-Bench Pro vs Opus 4.8 at 69.2, the biggest jump I have ever seen on that benchmark. It passed GPT 5.5 in both coding and intelligence on Artificial Analysis. I already canceled my $200 ChatGPT Pro plan. It fixed a Bridge Voice bug in one shot that GPT 5.5, Opus 4.7, and Opus 4.8 all failed to crack for 2 months. 10/10. Best model I have ever used. Full review below.

BridgeMind

19,020 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Kimi K3 absolutely mogs every open source model this is on par , head on head all case i tried in coding with fable , i feel weird to write , but sometimes it output better quality than fable too I don't know how to comprehend this , i have lots of test and comparison 😼

Kimi K3 absolutely mogs every open source model this is on par , head on head all case i tried in coding with fable , i feel weird to write , but sometimes it output better quality than fable too I don't know how to comprehend this , i have lots of test and comparison 😼

Chetaslua

131,209 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Truly unbelievable GLM 5.2 just released and it's an open weights model you can run locally The insane part is, it's just as good as Opus 4.8 Unlimited, free super intelligence running on your desk In this video I cover how it works, and how to set up your first local model:

Truly unbelievable GLM 5.2 just released and it's an open weights model you can run locally The insane part is, it's just as good as Opus 4.8 Unlimited, free super intelligence running on your desk In this video I cover how it works, and how to set up your first local model:

Alex Finn

124,819 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten