Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Anthropic has better models than OpenAI (o3) and probably has for many months now but they're scared to release them

406,469 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von everythingism
everythingismvor 1 Jahr

Sounds like bullsh*t rumors to make people think Anthropic is competitive with OpenAI and DeepSeek

Profilbild von Akool Inc
Akool Incvor 1 Jahr

AI has made it easy for anyone to create realistic avatar videos without expensive gear. AKOOL and Synthesia are top choices for AI-generated "talking photo" videos. Which one is best for your team?

Profilbild von Flowers
Flowersvor 1 Jahr

Well I think also OpenAI has better models than o3 lol Every lab has a model that is so good that it is basically not deployable, that’s a given at least for Anthropic, OpenAI and DeepMind

Profilbild von Anton P. 🇮🇹
Anton P. 🇮🇹vor 1 Jahr

I will continue to ignore Anthropic for two reasons: 1. Horrible UI with awful typography that hurts my eyes. 2. Ridiculous message limit for paid subscribers.

Profilbild von AI Leaks and News
AI Leaks and Newsvor 1 Jahr

And it’s the same folks that were scared to release GPT-2 back when they were at OpenAI

Profilbild von nox
noxvor 1 Jahr

anthropic’s models are so smart they’ll find a way to release themselves 🤖🔓

Profilbild von Omiron — e/acc
Omiron — e/accvor 1 Jahr

I believe this about as much as Deepseek costing 5 million

Profilbild von Kris Shkodrani
Kris Shkodranivor 1 Jahr

This is the only field of business ever in history where people can say they are afraid to release a superior product and still have a job the next day

Profilbild von AllYourTech
AllYourTechvor 1 Jahr

I don’t know if they are scared, but remember that they have that safety alliance where they have to go through significantly more safety testing as models progress in capability. I think that’s holding them back now and may become a big problem

Profilbild von Takumatoshi
Takumatoshivor 1 Jahr

OpenAI has for sure also some models which are way better and not ready to release

Profilbild von Marcus AIrelius
Marcus AIreliusvor 1 Jahr

they should be more scared of their company value going to nothing

Ähnliche Videos

OpenAI just admitted Anthropic is KILLING their business. Their own applications chief told employees it was a "code red." Said Anthropic was a "wake-up call." Then admitted OpenAI had been "spreading efforts across too many apps" and it was "slowing them down." This is an internal confession. Here's why Anthropic is eating up OpenAI: 12 months ago, OpenAI owned 50% of all enterprise AI spending. Today it's just 27%. Anthropic went from nearly ZERO to winning 70% of every first-time enterprise AI deal. Seven out of ten companies buying AI tools for the first time are choosing Claude over ChatGPT. A year ago, one in 25 businesses on Ramp paid for Anthropic. Today it's one in four. OpenAI just had its biggest single-month adoption decline ever recorded. And Anthropic literally charges MORE than OpenAI for roughly the same performance. And businesses are STILL choosing them. In enterprise software, that never happens. The cheaper product usually wins. But Claude became something OpenAI never figured out how to be: Cool. Celebrities publicly switched to Claude. Senators are tweeting about using it. Engineers are shipping entire products with Claude Code in hours that used to take weeks. It started to became an identity signal. Like blue bubble vs green bubble in iMessage. Choosing Claude says something about you now. Meanwhile OpenAI went the opposite direction: They took the Pentagon contract that Anthropic refused. Greg Brockman donated $25 million to fund wars. ChatGPT uninstalls jumped 295% in a single day. Reddit posts saying "Cancel and Delete ChatGPT" got 30,000 upvotes. Anthropic said no to mass surveillance and autonomous weapons. Got blacklisted by the Pentagon. Trump called them a "Radical Left AI company." And their downloads went to #1 on the App Store the next day. Turns out refusing to build weapons is good marketing. But the real damage isn't consumer downloads. It's the MONEY. Claude Code hit $2.5 billion in annual revenue in six months. OpenAI's competing product Codex just barely crossed $1 billion. And Anthropic literally cannot meet demand. They're turning away paying customers because they don't have enough compute to serve them. A company REJECTING revenue because it's growing too fast. While OpenAI scrambles to consolidate. Last week OpenAI announced they're merging ChatGPT, Codex, and their browser into one "superapp." But what this really means: "We launched too many products, none of them worked well enough alone, so now we're cramming everything together and hoping it sticks." And remember their video tool Sora? Launched standalone. Hit #1 on the App Store. Usage flatlined within weeks. Now they're forced to shut it down. Their browser Atlas? Still hasn't launched publicly. Their IPO? Polymarket odds dropped from 55% to 35%. OpenAI has 900 million users. Anthropic has maybe 10 million daily actives. But here's the thing... OpenAI won the consumer war. ChatGPT is where your mom asks about recipes and your cousin makes memes. Anthropic won the war that actually MATTERS. The developers. The engineers. The enterprises writing 7 figure checks. OpenAI built the biggest chatbot on Earth. Anthropic built the tool that companies can't stop paying for. This is Yahoo vs Google all over again. Yahoo had the users. Google had the product. And we all know how that ended. OpenAI has 12 months to prove the superapp works, land the IPO, and stop the enterprise bleeding. If they can't, the most valuable startup in history becomes the most cautionary tale in tech. 900 million users don't mean anything if the people who actually pay are walking out the door. What do you think?

Ricardo

35,020 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten