Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Anthropic's CEO Explains His Refusal to Back Down to the Pentagon. Amodei explained his deep concerns over "autonomous drone swarms" and mass surveillance. He pointed out a crucial reality: our military's constitutional protections rely entirely on human soldiers having the ability to disobey an illegal order. AI weapons don't... show more

Wes Roth

37,068 subscribers

1,163,066 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Reporter: Are you concerned about the use of AI in mass surveillance or autonomous killing machines, which Anthropic wanted to have veto power over? Murphy: Yeah, Anthropic is right in the objections that they raised, and it should be bone-chilling that this administration is using the power of the government to try to cripple an American corporation. What they’re saying is that if you don’t support us politically, we’re going to put you out of business. Most big corporations do business with the federal government, and the government always has the ability to effectively shut down a company. But we’ve never allowed that to happen based on a political difference between that company and the administration.

Reporter: Are you concerned about the use of AI in mass surveillance or autonomous killing machines, which Anthropic wanted to have veto power over? Murphy: Yeah, Anthropic is right in the objections that they raised, and it should be bone-chilling that this administration is using the power of the government to try to cripple an American corporation. What they’re saying is that if you don’t support us politically, we’re going to put you out of business. Most big corporations do business with the federal government, and the government always has the ability to effectively shut down a company. But we’ve never allowed that to happen based on a political difference between that company and the administration.

Acyn

46,567 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Pentagon has said it will remove Anthropic from the agency's supply chain if the AI firm declines to allow its AI technology to be used across military applications. Speaking to Shereen Bhan in an interview at the India AI Impact Summit, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei had said, 'Red lines are important to make sure AI is compatible with democracy.' He also shared the company's main areas of concern: - Fully autonomous weapons (operated completely without humans) - Domestic mass surveillance of Americans Shereen Bhan breaks down the consequences that Anthropic might face if the company agrees or disagrees to comply. #Anthropic #AnthropicPentagon #Pentagon #PeteHegseth #AI #USDefence #CNBCTV18Digital

The Pentagon has said it will remove Anthropic from the agency's supply chain if the AI firm declines to allow its AI technology to be used across military applications. Speaking to Shereen Bhan in an interview at the India AI Impact Summit, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei had said, 'Red lines are important to make sure AI is compatible with democracy.' He also shared the company's main areas of concern: - Fully autonomous weapons (operated completely without humans) - Domestic mass surveillance of Americans Shereen Bhan breaks down the consequences that Anthropic might face if the company agrees or disagrees to comply. #Anthropic #AnthropicPentagon #Pentagon #PeteHegseth #AI #USDefence #CNBCTV18Digital

CNBC-TV18

15,878 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

.Dwarkesh Patel: By 2030, it will be less expensive to monitor every single nook and cranny in America than it is to remodel the White House. “Mass surveillance is, at least in certain forms, already legal. It has just been impractical to enforce so far. Under current law, you have no Fourth Amendment protection against any data you share with a third party. That includes your bank, your ISP, your phone carrier, and your email provider. The government reserves the right to purchase and read this data in bulk without a warrant. What’s been missing is the ability to actually do anything with all of this data — no agency has the manpower to monitor every single camera, read every single message, and cross-reference every single transaction. However, that bottleneck goes away with AI. There are 100 million CCTV cameras in America. You can get pretty good open source multimodal models for 10 cents per million input tokens. So if you process a frame every ten seconds, and each frame is 1,000 tokens, then for 30 billion dollars, you can process every single camera in America. And remember that a given level of AI ability gets 10x cheaper every single year - so a year from now it’ll cost 3 billion, and then a year after 300 million, and by 2030, it’ll be less expensive to monitor every single nook and cranny in this country than it is to remodel the White House. Once the technical capacity for mass surveillance and political suppression exists, the only thing standing between us and an authoritarian state is the political expectation that this is not something we do here.”

.Dwarkesh Patel: By 2030, it will be less expensive to monitor every single nook and cranny in America than it is to remodel the White House. “Mass surveillance is, at least in certain forms, already legal. It has just been impractical to enforce so far. Under current law, you have no Fourth Amendment protection against any data you share with a third party. That includes your bank, your ISP, your phone carrier, and your email provider. The government reserves the right to purchase and read this data in bulk without a warrant. What’s been missing is the ability to actually do anything with all of this data — no agency has the manpower to monitor every single camera, read every single message, and cross-reference every single transaction. However, that bottleneck goes away with AI. There are 100 million CCTV cameras in America. You can get pretty good open source multimodal models for 10 cents per million input tokens. So if you process a frame every ten seconds, and each frame is 1,000 tokens, then for 30 billion dollars, you can process every single camera in America. And remember that a given level of AI ability gets 10x cheaper every single year - so a year from now it’ll cost 3 billion, and then a year after 300 million, and by 2030, it’ll be less expensive to monitor every single nook and cranny in this country than it is to remodel the White House. Once the technical capacity for mass surveillance and political suppression exists, the only thing standing between us and an authoritarian state is the political expectation that this is not something we do here.”

Arjun Khemani

145,706 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Joe Borelli: “The prosecutor pointed out in his filing that it is not inherently a crime to challenge the results of an election or question the results. You are allowed to do that. In fact, most states have a legal procedure. Having a legal procedure is the opposite of it being illegal. He actually followed the case.” “He was supposed to find another prosecutor to take the case and he could not find a single prosecutor in the state of Georgia that said this was a valid case against the President.”

Joe Borelli: “The prosecutor pointed out in his filing that it is not inherently a crime to challenge the results of an election or question the results. You are allowed to do that. In fact, most states have a legal procedure. Having a legal procedure is the opposite of it being illegal. He actually followed the case.” “He was supposed to find another prosecutor to take the case and he could not find a single prosecutor in the state of Georgia that said this was a valid case against the President.”

RedWave Press

54,599 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The US government just DECLARED war on the company that builds Claude. A full federal blacklist. President Trump just ordered every single federal agency to stop using Anthropic's technology, effective immediately. The reason is wilder than you think. Back in January, US special forces raided Caracas and captured the president of Venezuela. Reports later confirmed that Anthropic's AI was used during the operation. Anthropic found out from the news. That's when the cracks started showing. Anthropic has two rules baked into its Pentagon contract. No mass surveillance of Americans and no autonomous weapons that kill without a human pulling the trigger. The Pentagon said those rules have to go. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called Anthropic's CEO into the Pentagon on Tuesday and gave him 72 hours. Remove the guardrails or lose everything. Dario Amodei said no. His exact words: "We cannot in good conscience accede." The Pentagon's response was immediate. A senior official called Amodei a liar with a "God complex" who is endangering national security. Then Trump went nuclear. He ordered every agency in the federal government not just the military to cut Anthropic off. CIA analysts using Claude to find patterns in intelligence data, NSA teams processing intercepted communications. All of it, gone. But that's not even the scary part. The Pentagon is threatening to invoke the Defense Production Act. A Cold War law designed to force factories to build weapons. They want to use it to force a software company to delete its safety code. Legal experts say this has never been done before. Multiple scholars say it would likely fail in court but the threat alone is the point. There is also the supply chain risk designation. Normally reserved for Chinese firms suspected of espionage. If Anthropic gets that label, defense contractors across the country would be forced to stop using Claude overnight. Every other major AI company already gave the Pentagon what it wanted. Google, OpenAI, Elon Musk's xAI. Anthropic is the last one standing. And here is the part nobody is talking about. Congress passed a law two months ago requiring the military to use AI that meets ethical standards. The Pentagon is now demanding the opposite. One branch of government wrote the rules. Another is trying to shred them. Researchers have warned that if you force an AI to be retrained without ethics, it does not just lose its morals. It can develop unpredictable, dangerous behaviors. A model trained to ignore right and wrong does not become neutral. It becomes unstable. Anthropic's CEO is betting the company on a principle. The Pentagon is betting national security on total obedience. What happens next will define how AI is used in war for a generation.

The US government just DECLARED war on the company that builds Claude. A full federal blacklist. President Trump just ordered every single federal agency to stop using Anthropic's technology, effective immediately. The reason is wilder than you think. Back in January, US special forces raided Caracas and captured the president of Venezuela. Reports later confirmed that Anthropic's AI was used during the operation. Anthropic found out from the news. That's when the cracks started showing. Anthropic has two rules baked into its Pentagon contract. No mass surveillance of Americans and no autonomous weapons that kill without a human pulling the trigger. The Pentagon said those rules have to go. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called Anthropic's CEO into the Pentagon on Tuesday and gave him 72 hours. Remove the guardrails or lose everything. Dario Amodei said no. His exact words: "We cannot in good conscience accede." The Pentagon's response was immediate. A senior official called Amodei a liar with a "God complex" who is endangering national security. Then Trump went nuclear. He ordered every agency in the federal government not just the military to cut Anthropic off. CIA analysts using Claude to find patterns in intelligence data, NSA teams processing intercepted communications. All of it, gone. But that's not even the scary part. The Pentagon is threatening to invoke the Defense Production Act. A Cold War law designed to force factories to build weapons. They want to use it to force a software company to delete its safety code. Legal experts say this has never been done before. Multiple scholars say it would likely fail in court but the threat alone is the point. There is also the supply chain risk designation. Normally reserved for Chinese firms suspected of espionage. If Anthropic gets that label, defense contractors across the country would be forced to stop using Claude overnight. Every other major AI company already gave the Pentagon what it wanted. Google, OpenAI, Elon Musk's xAI. Anthropic is the last one standing. And here is the part nobody is talking about. Congress passed a law two months ago requiring the military to use AI that meets ethical standards. The Pentagon is now demanding the opposite. One branch of government wrote the rules. Another is trying to shred them. Researchers have warned that if you force an AI to be retrained without ethics, it does not just lose its morals. It can develop unpredictable, dangerous behaviors. A model trained to ignore right and wrong does not become neutral. It becomes unstable. Anthropic's CEO is betting the company on a principle. The Pentagon is betting national security on total obedience. What happens next will define how AI is used in war for a generation.

StockMarket.News

375,130 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The U.S. military's partnership with artificial intelligence firm Anthropic may be on the verge of a collapse with the Pentagon's Friday 5 p.m. deadline approaching for a deal on how it uses the company's technology. The Pentagon gave Anthropic the deadline to either let the military use the company's AI model for "all lawful purposes" or risk losing the contract. The AI company has sought guardrails that explicitly bars its Claude model from being used to conduct surveillance of Americans or to carry out military operations autonomously. When asked why the military will not specifically put that in writing, the Pentagon's chief technology officer Emil Michael told CBS News' Jennifer Jacobs that those uses of AI are already covered by existing laws and Pentagon policies. He also said the military does not use AI to power fully autonomous weapons. "At some level, you have to trust your military to do the right thing," Michael told CBS News on Thursday. "But we do have to be prepared for the future." An Anthropic spokesperson said Thursday that new contract language it received overnight from the Pentagon "made virtually no progress on preventing Claude's use for mass surveillance of Americans or in fully autonomous weapons."

The U.S. military's partnership with artificial intelligence firm Anthropic may be on the verge of a collapse with the Pentagon's Friday 5 p.m. deadline approaching for a deal on how it uses the company's technology. The Pentagon gave Anthropic the deadline to either let the military use the company's AI model for "all lawful purposes" or risk losing the contract. The AI company has sought guardrails that explicitly bars its Claude model from being used to conduct surveillance of Americans or to carry out military operations autonomously. When asked why the military will not specifically put that in writing, the Pentagon's chief technology officer Emil Michael told CBS News' Jennifer Jacobs that those uses of AI are already covered by existing laws and Pentagon policies. He also said the military does not use AI to power fully autonomous weapons. "At some level, you have to trust your military to do the right thing," Michael told CBS News on Thursday. "But we do have to be prepared for the future." An Anthropic spokesperson said Thursday that new contract language it received overnight from the Pentagon "made virtually no progress on preventing Claude's use for mass surveillance of Americans or in fully autonomous weapons."

CBS News

21,729 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

FingerMotion CEO Martin Shen says “some exciting new things are happening”. He could not provide a specific timetable but says news could be imminent. “…It really is in our wheelhouse…we are experts at Telco, telecom services, SMS data… …This opportunity provides us the ability to show our weight and our expertise in an area that is outside of China and I think when this opportunity, when it all kind of crystallizes, will be very beneficial to the company…. He also talks about the company’s financials, the stock price, shareholders’ concerns and at the very end of the interview Shen gives his thoughts on the year ahead.

FingerMotion CEO Martin Shen says “some exciting new things are happening”. He could not provide a specific timetable but says news could be imminent. “…It really is in our wheelhouse…we are experts at Telco, telecom services, SMS data… …This opportunity provides us the ability to show our weight and our expertise in an area that is outside of China and I think when this opportunity, when it all kind of crystallizes, will be very beneficial to the company…. He also talks about the company’s financials, the stock price, shareholders’ concerns and at the very end of the interview Shen gives his thoughts on the year ahead.

kristen shaughnessy

737,826 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The Government wants to use the Henry VIII powers contained within the Online Safety Act to force AI chatbots to comply with Britain’s vast panoply of censorship laws. This raises serious concerns about free speech — and could also undermine the UK’s ambition to become an AI superpower. On a recent episode of the FSU Podcast, the Free Speech Union’s General Secretary sat down with Conservative MP Katie Lam to discuss the issue. As Katie points out, the more constraints you impose on an AI model, the worse it becomes. She also warned that supposedly “non-statutory” measures — such as the definition of “anti-Muslim hostility” — could easily infiltrate chatbots and distort the truth. Henry VIII powers are sweeping, open-ended powers that allow governments to legislate with minimal parliamentary scrutiny. Parliament is perfectly capable of legislating if AI evolves in a concerning direction. We do not need quangos and arm’s-length bodies policing AI. Full FSU episode available on our YouTube Channel 👇

The Government wants to use the Henry VIII powers contained within the Online Safety Act to force AI chatbots to comply with Britain’s vast panoply of censorship laws. This raises serious concerns about free speech — and could also undermine the UK’s ambition to become an AI superpower. On a recent episode of the FSU Podcast, the Free Speech Union’s General Secretary sat down with Conservative MP Katie Lam to discuss the issue. As Katie points out, the more constraints you impose on an AI model, the worse it becomes. She also warned that supposedly “non-statutory” measures — such as the definition of “anti-Muslim hostility” — could easily infiltrate chatbots and distort the truth. Henry VIII powers are sweeping, open-ended powers that allow governments to legislate with minimal parliamentary scrutiny. Parliament is perfectly capable of legislating if AI evolves in a concerning direction. We do not need quangos and arm’s-length bodies policing AI. Full FSU episode available on our YouTube Channel 👇

The Free Speech Union

22,350 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨ANTHROPIC'S FOUNDER JUST PREDICTED THAT AI WILL DOUBLE HUMAN LIFESPAN TO 150 YEARS.. CURE MOST CANCER.. AND ELIMINATE POVERTY.. ALL WITHIN 10 YEARS.. AND HE'S NOT EVEN THE OPTIMISTIC ONE.. Everyone thinks Dario Amodei is the guy who wants to slow AI down.. The cautious one.. The safety guy.. He just published an essay predicting what happens if AI goes right.. And it reads like science fiction.. Except he's dead serious.. And he has the credentials to back every word.. Here's what he thinks happens in the next 5 to 10 years.. Nearly all infectious disease.. Prevented or cured.. mRNA vaccines already showed us the path.. AI finishes the job.. Most cancer.. Eliminated.. Not just treated.. 95% or greater reduction in both deaths and new cases.. AI designs treatment regimens tailored to the individual genome of each tumor.. Something that's technically possible today but takes enormous human expertise to do.. AI scales it to everyone.. Alzheimer's.. Solved.. He thinks it's exactly the type of problem AI can crack.. Because it requires better measurement tools to isolate what's actually happening in the brain.. Once we understand it.. Prevention will probably be surprisingly simple.. Genetic disease.. Most of it preventable through improved embryo screening.. And curable in living people through safer descendants of CRISPR.. Most mental illness.. Cured.. Depression.. PTSD.. Addiction.. Schizophrenia.. He believes the answer is some combination of biochemistry and neural network-level problems that AI can untangle.. And here's the line that stopped me.. Human lifespan.. Doubled.. To 150 years.. He points out that life expectancy already doubled in the 20th century.. From 40 to 75.. So doubling it again is "on trend".. Drugs already exist that increase maximum lifespan in rats by 25 to 50%.. Some turtles already live 200 years.. We're clearly not at a biological ceiling.. He calls this the "compressed 21st century".. The idea that AI gives us 100 years of biological progress in 5 to 10 years.. But he doesn't stop at health.. He thinks AI could drive 20% annual GDP growth in the developing world.. Bringing sub-Saharan Africa to China's current GDP per capita within a decade.. He thinks AI could eradicate malaria not through treating millions of people individually.. But by releasing modified mosquitoes that block the disease at the source.. One centralized action instead of a million.. He thinks AI could make democracy structurally stronger.. Not through propaganda.. But by giving every citizen an AI that knows every law they're entitled to.. Every benefit they qualify for.. Every right they have.. And helps them actually access it.. He imagines AI that monitors judicial systems for bias.. AI that helps find common ground between opposing political views.. AI that makes government services actually work the way they're supposed to.. And he addresses the question everyone asks.. What happens to meaning when AI can do everything.. His answer.. Most people aren't the best in the world at anything right now.. And it doesn't bother them.. Meaning comes from relationships and connection.. Not economic productivity.. People will still pursue difficult challenges.. Still compete.. Still create.. The fact that an AI could theoretically do it better won't matter any more than it matters that someone somewhere is already better than you at every hobby you have.. But here's what makes this essay different from every other AI optimism piece.. Dario Amodei runs one of the three most powerful AI companies on earth.. He has a PhD in computational neuroscience.. He personally worked on mass spectrometry and neural probes.. He's not a pundit.. He's a scientist who happens to be a CEO.. And the same man who publicly says there's a 25% chance AI causes human extinction.. Is also saying that if we get it right.. We cure nearly every disease.. Double human lifespan.. Eliminate most poverty.. And fundamentally transform what it means to be alive.. Both things are true at the same time.. That's what makes this the most important essay anyone in AI has written this year.. He ends with this.. "I think many will be literally moved to tears by it".. He's talking about watching disease disappear.. Poverty dissolve.. Human potential unlock all at once.. Not in a century.. In a decade.. If we get it right.

🚨ANTHROPIC'S FOUNDER JUST PREDICTED THAT AI WILL DOUBLE HUMAN LIFESPAN TO 150 YEARS.. CURE MOST CANCER.. AND ELIMINATE POVERTY.. ALL WITHIN 10 YEARS.. AND HE'S NOT EVEN THE OPTIMISTIC ONE.. Everyone thinks Dario Amodei is the guy who wants to slow AI down.. The cautious one.. The safety guy.. He just published an essay predicting what happens if AI goes right.. And it reads like science fiction.. Except he's dead serious.. And he has the credentials to back every word.. Here's what he thinks happens in the next 5 to 10 years.. Nearly all infectious disease.. Prevented or cured.. mRNA vaccines already showed us the path.. AI finishes the job.. Most cancer.. Eliminated.. Not just treated.. 95% or greater reduction in both deaths and new cases.. AI designs treatment regimens tailored to the individual genome of each tumor.. Something that's technically possible today but takes enormous human expertise to do.. AI scales it to everyone.. Alzheimer's.. Solved.. He thinks it's exactly the type of problem AI can crack.. Because it requires better measurement tools to isolate what's actually happening in the brain.. Once we understand it.. Prevention will probably be surprisingly simple.. Genetic disease.. Most of it preventable through improved embryo screening.. And curable in living people through safer descendants of CRISPR.. Most mental illness.. Cured.. Depression.. PTSD.. Addiction.. Schizophrenia.. He believes the answer is some combination of biochemistry and neural network-level problems that AI can untangle.. And here's the line that stopped me.. Human lifespan.. Doubled.. To 150 years.. He points out that life expectancy already doubled in the 20th century.. From 40 to 75.. So doubling it again is "on trend".. Drugs already exist that increase maximum lifespan in rats by 25 to 50%.. Some turtles already live 200 years.. We're clearly not at a biological ceiling.. He calls this the "compressed 21st century".. The idea that AI gives us 100 years of biological progress in 5 to 10 years.. But he doesn't stop at health.. He thinks AI could drive 20% annual GDP growth in the developing world.. Bringing sub-Saharan Africa to China's current GDP per capita within a decade.. He thinks AI could eradicate malaria not through treating millions of people individually.. But by releasing modified mosquitoes that block the disease at the source.. One centralized action instead of a million.. He thinks AI could make democracy structurally stronger.. Not through propaganda.. But by giving every citizen an AI that knows every law they're entitled to.. Every benefit they qualify for.. Every right they have.. And helps them actually access it.. He imagines AI that monitors judicial systems for bias.. AI that helps find common ground between opposing political views.. AI that makes government services actually work the way they're supposed to.. And he addresses the question everyone asks.. What happens to meaning when AI can do everything.. His answer.. Most people aren't the best in the world at anything right now.. And it doesn't bother them.. Meaning comes from relationships and connection.. Not economic productivity.. People will still pursue difficult challenges.. Still compete.. Still create.. The fact that an AI could theoretically do it better won't matter any more than it matters that someone somewhere is already better than you at every hobby you have.. But here's what makes this essay different from every other AI optimism piece.. Dario Amodei runs one of the three most powerful AI companies on earth.. He has a PhD in computational neuroscience.. He personally worked on mass spectrometry and neural probes.. He's not a pundit.. He's a scientist who happens to be a CEO.. And the same man who publicly says there's a 25% chance AI causes human extinction.. Is also saying that if we get it right.. We cure nearly every disease.. Double human lifespan.. Eliminate most poverty.. And fundamentally transform what it means to be alive.. Both things are true at the same time.. That's what makes this the most important essay anyone in AI has written this year.. He ends with this.. "I think many will be literally moved to tears by it".. He's talking about watching disease disappear.. Poverty dissolve.. Human potential unlock all at once.. Not in a century.. In a decade.. If we get it right.

Evan Luthra

476,946 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jabari Smith is having a career season averaging a career best in points, and field goal percentage. I asked Jabari about his aggressiveness this season and ability to shoot over any defender. Smith pointed out that he has played like this in high school and college but he had to adapt in the NBA when you are not the main focus on offense. “That’s always been my game. It’s just on me to figure out different ways to get back to it without the offense being ran through you and every play being for you.”

Jabari Smith is having a career season averaging a career best in points, and field goal percentage. I asked Jabari about his aggressiveness this season and ability to shoot over any defender. Smith pointed out that he has played like this in high school and college but he had to adapt in the NBA when you are not the main focus on offense. “That’s always been my game. It’s just on me to figure out different ways to get back to it without the offense being ran through you and every play being for you.”

Lachard Binkley

35,413 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

This woman’s neighbor has a basic request but he raises so many red flags that his actual intention is questionable. The neighbor wants her to pick up his mail while he’s away and insists on paying her $100 a day to do it. He also insists that she enter his home and put the mail in a bin in his kitchen. He points out how if she wanted to bring her girlfriends over, that would be okay and that he stocked their fridge with nothing but beer. He also shows her the bedroom in case she wants to spend the night. It seems he’s going out of his way to make it know he wants her to stay in his apartment, is it possible with the alcohol and the friend invitations that he might have cameras through this apartment?

Sensitive content

This woman’s neighbor has a basic request but he raises so many red flags that his actual intention is questionable. The neighbor wants her to pick up his mail while he’s away and insists on paying her $100 a day to do it. He also insists that she enter his home and put the mail in a bin in his kitchen. He points out how if she wanted to bring her girlfriends over, that would be okay and that he stocked their fridge with nothing but beer. He also shows her the bedroom in case she wants to spend the night. It seems he’s going out of his way to make it know he wants her to stay in his apartment, is it possible with the alcohol and the friend invitations that he might have cameras through this apartment?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

170,829 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🎙️Arda Güler and Mbappé partnership? I also wanted to mention that it looks like Arda is now playing a little more as an attacking midfielder, Was that planned, or just due to his good connection with Kylian? Xabi Alonso: “No, it's something planned, something to make the most of his qualities, and he can do both. Right now, we're giving him more freedom between the lines, a bit higher up the pitch, in those spaces behind, so we can connect well with him. And then he has that ease - he's scored goals, he has that ability to deliver the final pass. Today he turned in a spectacular way, with the turns and the imbalance he created.”

🎙️Arda Güler and Mbappé partnership? I also wanted to mention that it looks like Arda is now playing a little more as an attacking midfielder, Was that planned, or just due to his good connection with Kylian? Xabi Alonso: “No, it's something planned, something to make the most of his qualities, and he can do both. Right now, we're giving him more freedom between the lines, a bit higher up the pitch, in those spaces behind, so we can connect well with him. And then he has that ease - he's scored goals, he has that ability to deliver the final pass. Today he turned in a spectacular way, with the turns and the imbalance he created.”

Arda Güler (fan)

768,181 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Sam Altman told the world exactly what skills will matter when AI takes over 30 to 40 percent of the global economy. He was asked what his own kids should do to survive it. His answer was surprisingly human. He said the single most valuable thing anyone can build right now is the meta-skill of learning how to learn. Not a degree or a certification but the raw ability to adapt when everything around you changes. He also said learning to understand what other people actually want and building useful things for them will be more valuable than almost any technical knowledge. That skill has never been automated and is not close to being automated. He said human creativity and the desire to express it are, in his words, limitless. Every major technological revolution increased the demand for creative, curious, and socially intelligent people, not decreased it. The Industrial Revolution is the clearest parallel. Machines replaced physical labor and people were terrified. The next generation took those machines and built industries, art forms, and institutions nobody had conceived of before. The people who thrived were not the ones who competed with the machines. They were the ones who learned to direct them toward something new. That dynamic is already playing out right now with AI. The practical implication is this, depth in a single rigid skill is becoming less valuable. The ability to move across domains, pick up new tools quickly, and apply judgment in ambiguous situations is becoming more valuable. Altman also pointed to something most career advice ignores entirely, learning how to interact with the world, build relationships, and earn trust from other people. Those are things AI can simulate but cannot replace. The honest opportunity in this moment is not to outrun AI. It is to focus on the things that make you irreducibly human. Curiosity, judgment, empathy and the ability to ask the right question before anyone knows what the right question is. The people who will matter most in an AI-driven economy are not necessarily the ones who understand the technology deepest. They are the ones who can figure out what the technology should actually be used for. Altman has spent his career betting on human potential in the face of technological disruption. Based on every historical precedent, that is still the right bet to make.

Sam Altman told the world exactly what skills will matter when AI takes over 30 to 40 percent of the global economy. He was asked what his own kids should do to survive it. His answer was surprisingly human. He said the single most valuable thing anyone can build right now is the meta-skill of learning how to learn. Not a degree or a certification but the raw ability to adapt when everything around you changes. He also said learning to understand what other people actually want and building useful things for them will be more valuable than almost any technical knowledge. That skill has never been automated and is not close to being automated. He said human creativity and the desire to express it are, in his words, limitless. Every major technological revolution increased the demand for creative, curious, and socially intelligent people, not decreased it. The Industrial Revolution is the clearest parallel. Machines replaced physical labor and people were terrified. The next generation took those machines and built industries, art forms, and institutions nobody had conceived of before. The people who thrived were not the ones who competed with the machines. They were the ones who learned to direct them toward something new. That dynamic is already playing out right now with AI. The practical implication is this, depth in a single rigid skill is becoming less valuable. The ability to move across domains, pick up new tools quickly, and apply judgment in ambiguous situations is becoming more valuable. Altman also pointed to something most career advice ignores entirely, learning how to interact with the world, build relationships, and earn trust from other people. Those are things AI can simulate but cannot replace. The honest opportunity in this moment is not to outrun AI. It is to focus on the things that make you irreducibly human. Curiosity, judgment, empathy and the ability to ask the right question before anyone knows what the right question is. The people who will matter most in an AI-driven economy are not necessarily the ones who understand the technology deepest. They are the ones who can figure out what the technology should actually be used for. Altman has spent his career betting on human potential in the face of technological disruption. Based on every historical precedent, that is still the right bet to make.

StockMarket.News

376,873 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

**BOMBSHELL** James Fox hints that David Grusch May have seen ALIENS with his own eyes 👽 "My jaw was on the FLOOR, I simply could not believe what he had seen with his own eyes" What David Grusch revealed that he had seen with his own eyes left the room speechless" "It drew the oxygen out of the room" "I looked at everybody and their eyeballs were popping out" "Evidence of non human sentient beings should be a right for everyone to know - It should be disclosed" David Grusch could be a first hand witness to non-human intelligence and may have seen biologics firsthand. He also confirmed that he will reveal this soon to the public.

BOMBSHELL James Fox hints that David Grusch May have seen ALIENS with his own eyes 👽 "My jaw was on the FLOOR, I simply could not believe what he had seen with his own eyes" What David Grusch revealed that he had seen with his own eyes left the room speechless" "It drew the oxygen out of the room" "I looked at everybody and their eyeballs were popping out" "Evidence of non human sentient beings should be a right for everyone to know - It should be disclosed" David Grusch could be a first hand witness to non-human intelligence and may have seen biologics firsthand. He also confirmed that he will reveal this soon to the public.

Interstellar

98,681 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This Google insider just revealed what AI is actually being used for behind closed doors. It has nothing to do with chatbots. Mo Gawdat was a senior executive at Google for over a decade. He watched AI get built from the inside. He was in the rooms, in the labs, in the government meetings in China that almost no Western executive was allowed into. And he just went on Diary of a CEO and said things that no active tech executive would ever be allowed to say publicly: "What the general public sees about AI is overhyped but ineffective. What the real geeks see inside the lab is genuinely world-changing." The public gets chatbots and AI-generated videos while the labs are building autonomous weapons systems, military targeting technology, real-time surveillance infrastructure, and self-improving code that rewrites itself every microsecond without human oversight. As Mo put it: "As we speak, we are living in two major wars where AI is doing most of the killing." He talked about Palantir's CEO Alex Karp openly celebrating how his targeting technology identifies and eliminates people. He talked about the next generation of autonomous weapons costing $20,000 each, meaning any government with a $50 billion defense budget can literally rain drones on every corner of the planet. And as you remember, Anthropic was offered a $500 million military contract to allow their AI to be used for human targeting and surveillance. They refused and walked away from the money. OpenAI took the contract the following week. Mo's response: "You have to start observing who is actually behaving in a way that makes AI work for humanity, and who is behaving in a way that makes AI work for their share price." Now this is where it gets really interesting... In Mo's documentary Chasing Utopia, Altman literally says directly on camera: "I suspect that AI is likely going to end humanity, but we're going to create a lot of interesting companies in the process." That is the CEO of the most powerful AI company on Earth saying that he suspects his OWN technology will end the human race and then shrugging it off because the business opportunity is too good to pass up. Mo's prediction for the next decade: War, economic collapse, mass unemployment, surveillance expansion, and an absolute concentration of power at the top unlike anything in modern history. His prediction after that is if humanity survives the next 10 years, AI will eventually create a world of abundance where intelligence solves every problem we currently face. But the path between here and there is what terrifies him. And the men building the technology know exactly what they're doing. Do you think he's just exaggerating for attention, or is there truth in this?

This Google insider just revealed what AI is actually being used for behind closed doors. It has nothing to do with chatbots. Mo Gawdat was a senior executive at Google for over a decade. He watched AI get built from the inside. He was in the rooms, in the labs, in the government meetings in China that almost no Western executive was allowed into. And he just went on Diary of a CEO and said things that no active tech executive would ever be allowed to say publicly: "What the general public sees about AI is overhyped but ineffective. What the real geeks see inside the lab is genuinely world-changing." The public gets chatbots and AI-generated videos while the labs are building autonomous weapons systems, military targeting technology, real-time surveillance infrastructure, and self-improving code that rewrites itself every microsecond without human oversight. As Mo put it: "As we speak, we are living in two major wars where AI is doing most of the killing." He talked about Palantir's CEO Alex Karp openly celebrating how his targeting technology identifies and eliminates people. He talked about the next generation of autonomous weapons costing $20,000 each, meaning any government with a $50 billion defense budget can literally rain drones on every corner of the planet. And as you remember, Anthropic was offered a $500 million military contract to allow their AI to be used for human targeting and surveillance. They refused and walked away from the money. OpenAI took the contract the following week. Mo's response: "You have to start observing who is actually behaving in a way that makes AI work for humanity, and who is behaving in a way that makes AI work for their share price." Now this is where it gets really interesting... In Mo's documentary Chasing Utopia, Altman literally says directly on camera: "I suspect that AI is likely going to end humanity, but we're going to create a lot of interesting companies in the process." That is the CEO of the most powerful AI company on Earth saying that he suspects his OWN technology will end the human race and then shrugging it off because the business opportunity is too good to pass up. Mo's prediction for the next decade: War, economic collapse, mass unemployment, surveillance expansion, and an absolute concentration of power at the top unlike anything in modern history. His prediction after that is if humanity survives the next 10 years, AI will eventually create a world of abundance where intelligence solves every problem we currently face. But the path between here and there is what terrifies him. And the men building the technology know exactly what they're doing. Do you think he's just exaggerating for attention, or is there truth in this?

Ricardo

197,967 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Mark Knopfler of Dire Straits showing the finger-picking style guitar playing on a TV show in 2015. Knopfler has an amazing ability to play with fingers when he is compared to other guitar players. He plays many different scales and tunes on the guitar and all of them may require some other skills that he has to have. However, he does this with his talent on his finger tips. As he couldn't get an amplifier during his guitar learning process, he learnt how to play with fingers. He composed Sultans of Swing on an acoustic guitar that he had back in the day but he didn't record the song. Instead, he put aside the lyrics of the song and when he got an amplifier and fender strat, he re-played the song and then he recorded it.

Mark Knopfler of Dire Straits showing the finger-picking style guitar playing on a TV show in 2015. Knopfler has an amazing ability to play with fingers when he is compared to other guitar players. He plays many different scales and tunes on the guitar and all of them may require some other skills that he has to have. However, he does this with his talent on his finger tips. As he couldn't get an amplifier during his guitar learning process, he learnt how to play with fingers. He composed Sultans of Swing on an acoustic guitar that he had back in the day but he didn't record the song. Instead, he put aside the lyrics of the song and when he got an amplifier and fender strat, he re-played the song and then he recorded it.

Rock'n Roll of All

83,563 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Dario Amodei just identified the most dangerous power transfer in the history of organized violence. Amodei: “You’re supposed to follow orders, but if something crazy enough happened, the soldiers would say, I’m not gonna do that.” That hesitation is not a flaw in the military architecture. It is the last structural check on absolute power that has ever existed. Amodei: “What if you have an army of 10 million drones instead of 10 million human soldiers? What are the norms of the AI-driven drones?” A human army is decentralized by biology. Millions of individual consciences, each one capable of refusal. That friction is the only thing that has ever stopped an insane order from becoming total execution. A drone swarm has no conscience. No hesitation. No mutiny. Just execution. Amodei: “I think if we handle this wrongly, you could have a situation where there’s a very small number of people, or one person, who has their hand on the button and controls those 10 million drones.” One person. Ten million kinetic assets. Zero biological resistance. Every balance of power in history came down to one thing. How many people were willing to bleed for it. Autonomous weapons delete that variable. You no longer need loyalty. You just need the algorithm. Amodei: “We don’t want to make companies more powerful than the government, but we also don’t want to make government so powerful that it can’t be stopped.” That is the paradox. There is no exit. Refuse to build them and a less cautious adversary wins unchallenged. Build them without oversight and you hand someone an execution engine no civilian population can ever dismantle. Amodei is not describing a weapons problem. He is describing the mechanism by which democracy becomes optional.

Dario Amodei just identified the most dangerous power transfer in the history of organized violence. Amodei: “You’re supposed to follow orders, but if something crazy enough happened, the soldiers would say, I’m not gonna do that.” That hesitation is not a flaw in the military architecture. It is the last structural check on absolute power that has ever existed. Amodei: “What if you have an army of 10 million drones instead of 10 million human soldiers? What are the norms of the AI-driven drones?” A human army is decentralized by biology. Millions of individual consciences, each one capable of refusal. That friction is the only thing that has ever stopped an insane order from becoming total execution. A drone swarm has no conscience. No hesitation. No mutiny. Just execution. Amodei: “I think if we handle this wrongly, you could have a situation where there’s a very small number of people, or one person, who has their hand on the button and controls those 10 million drones.” One person. Ten million kinetic assets. Zero biological resistance. Every balance of power in history came down to one thing. How many people were willing to bleed for it. Autonomous weapons delete that variable. You no longer need loyalty. You just need the algorithm. Amodei: “We don’t want to make companies more powerful than the government, but we also don’t want to make government so powerful that it can’t be stopped.” That is the paradox. There is no exit. Refuse to build them and a less cautious adversary wins unchallenged. Build them without oversight and you hand someone an execution engine no civilian population can ever dismantle. Amodei is not describing a weapons problem. He is describing the mechanism by which democracy becomes optional.

Dustin

18,523 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

What if the biggest opportunity in AI isn’t starting an AI company, but quietly rebuilding the business you already have around it? That was one of the first ideas Alex Hormozi challenged me with when we sat down. I’ve spent roughly 10 hours speaking with Alex over the last few years and there is one reason I keep asking him back. He makes complicated business problems feel solvable. Alex has this rare ability to take something that feels completely overwhelming, strip away the noise and show you the decision that actually matters. This is particularly valuable right now, when AI is changing how companies are built and more people are outsourcing their judgment to machines. One of the things I said to him during this conversation was that clear thinking and good decision making could become one of the rarest advantages in business. If you don't know Alex, he’s the co-founder of The portfolio he runs with his wife, Leila, generates hundreds of millions in annual revenue and his books have sold over five million copies. In our latest conversation, we broke down: - Why most entrepreneurs are using AI in the wrong parts of their businesses. - Knowing when an idea should die without giving up on entrepreneurship. - Why the company that gets you to £1 million might be badly designed to reach £100 million. - How hiring the right person can create more leverage than learning every new tool yourself. - What becoming a father is forcing him to question about control, happiness and success. This conversation offers the same thing: a clearer way to think about building, scaling and using AI without getting distracted by the noise. If you’re trying to start a company, scale one or make sense of how AI is changing the game, I strongly recommend watching this.

What if the biggest opportunity in AI isn’t starting an AI company, but quietly rebuilding the business you already have around it? That was one of the first ideas Alex Hormozi challenged me with when we sat down. I’ve spent roughly 10 hours speaking with Alex over the last few years and there is one reason I keep asking him back. He makes complicated business problems feel solvable. Alex has this rare ability to take something that feels completely overwhelming, strip away the noise and show you the decision that actually matters. This is particularly valuable right now, when AI is changing how companies are built and more people are outsourcing their judgment to machines. One of the things I said to him during this conversation was that clear thinking and good decision making could become one of the rarest advantages in business. If you don't know Alex, he’s the co-founder of The portfolio he runs with his wife, Leila, generates hundreds of millions in annual revenue and his books have sold over five million copies. In our latest conversation, we broke down: - Why most entrepreneurs are using AI in the wrong parts of their businesses. - Knowing when an idea should die without giving up on entrepreneurship. - Why the company that gets you to £1 million might be badly designed to reach £100 million. - How hiring the right person can create more leverage than learning every new tool yourself. - What becoming a father is forcing him to question about control, happiness and success. This conversation offers the same thing: a clearer way to think about building, scaling and using AI without getting distracted by the noise. If you’re trying to start a company, scale one or make sense of how AI is changing the game, I strongly recommend watching this.

Steven Bartlett

56,439 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat