Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

APPARENTLY SAUDI ARABIA IS UNDER ATTACK. THE US “CAN’T” HELP BECAUSE THE NAVY HAS BEEN CHASED FAR AWAY. AND THE ONLY DEFENSIVE MISSILES LEFT ARE PROTECTING ISRAEL. We are extremely low on offensive missiles and our fighter jets can’t fly because they don’t have any bases to launch attacks....

119,065 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

7 Kommentare

Profilbild von djconn
djconnvor 2 Tagen

Just a question here, don't we have some kind of contract with Saudi to "protect" them? My BAD. We don't.

Profilbild von Maxene
Maxenevor 2 Tagen

This is what happens when the side that you back isn’t really anything more than smoke and mirrors and a Hollywood bullshit dream of supremacy which they don’t have. They are a decade empire that’s on its last legs.

Profilbild von Sharen6 (Thitha)
Sharen6 (Thitha)vor 2 Tagen

If it gets the west out of the Middle East sadly it’s what it is! The west had done nothing but caused division…murdering and pillaging their way through. Never understood why Saudi jumped into bed with them 🥺

Profilbild von john biggins
john bigginsvor 2 Tagen

Well......who saw that coming....! Mid term madman doesnt care

Profilbild von Tiki Rose USAF Retiree w/ 20 yrs Active Duty
Tiki Rose USAF Retiree w/ 20 yrs Active Dutyvor 2 Tagen

Saudis want the U.S. to make all of the sacrifices.

Profilbild von john biggins
john bigginsvor 2 Tagen

Saudis need only WAIT for deaths. by looks

Profilbild von RHatten
RHattenvor 2 Tagen

SO... Partnering with the US didn't go as planned... Who knew... The Orange CLOWN was a no show due to his LACK OF PLANNING... or his actual planning from his handlers...

Ähnliche Videos

What is Netanyahu expected to say to the president? The main problem with the ballistic-missile story is that the Iranians have caught on to the daylight—the gap—between Israel and the United States. What happened here is that Donald Trump gave his word and then broke it. "We will not allow Iran to have nuclear weapons." But he didn’t talk about conventional weapons—the ballistic missiles that threaten Israel. They threaten Israel to such an extent that Netanyahu himself, in a video announcing to the Israeli people that he was launching Operation Nation of Lions, said that two existential threats had developed. The nuclear threat—you’ve known about for years—but also the threat of thousands of ballistic missiles. What has happened since then? The Iranians are not acting at all on the nuclear front, as far as we know. They have not even extracted the enriched material buried underground. But they are very much intensifying their experiments with ballistic missiles. Either because they think it is threatening, or because, as Netanyahu says, it is an existential threat to Israel. We also have a race between the number of their missiles and the number of our missiles—and let’s say that both countries need to recover on this issue. Let’s ask the question now, and here I don’t have an answer. When Netanyahu goes to Washington to talk to Trump about this, is he talking to him about a combined attack—which seems a bit far-fetched to me, because the Americans really have no intention of getting involved in a conventional weapons conflict anywhere in the world; otherwise they would never get out of it—or is he content to give Israel permission to attack on its own, with the U.S. providing a defensive umbrella? One. Two, it should also be said, in this context, that there is a big debate in the Israeli cabinet and at the top about whether it is possible to launch an attack every six months. You cannot—unlike the nuclear project—you cannot eliminate the Iranian ballistic threat. Is it sustainable to come every six months, eight months, and launch another round, which includes them firing at us, all the flights leaving Israel, and all the implications for the economy? There is no decision in Israel. There is no decision in the U.S. that's what they will discuss.

Amit Segal

273,898 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.

Amit Segal

41,392 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten