Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 An Iranian Missile Storm Coming? Col Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) warns of major escalation if Iran is attacked! 💥 “If they are attacked at all, they will not exercise restraint as they have in the past... They will respond with whatever they have that can reach the targets.”...

DanielLDavis1's profile picture

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

75,405 subscribers

42,884 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

⚠️ “Inside the Strategy: An Operation Intended to ‘Destroy Iran’” ⚠️ Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) lays out a sobering assessment of what is being planned — and who it truly serves: A US hit on Iran wouldn't be limited and it wouldn't serve American interests—it's long been Netanyahu's desires. 🔥 If an attack is ordered, it will be designed not to simply harm Iran. A US-led attack will seek to *destroy* Iran. 💥 "It's designed to cause the state itself to disintegrate." “The principal punch will be delivered by the Air Force" — the ships would be in a support role. ✈️⚡ 🛑 "(Many of those lusting for war with Iran believe that they) have an opportunity to do to Iran what we had aimed to do against Russia" - completely destroy the state. Do not miss this sobering analysis—WATCH the full clip NOW on Daniel Davis Deep Dive! 👉 👉 #IranWar #USForeignPolicy #Netanyahu #MacgregorAnalysis #Geopolitics #MiddleEastCrisis #RegionalWar
1:16

⚠️ “Inside the Strategy: An Operation Intended to ‘Destroy Iran’” ⚠️ Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) lays out a sobering assessment of what is being planned — and who it truly serves: A US hit on Iran wouldn't be limited and it wouldn't serve American interests—it's long been Netanyahu's desires. 🔥 If an attack is ordered, it will be designed not to simply harm Iran. A US-led attack will seek to *destroy* Iran. 💥 "It's designed to cause the state itself to disintegrate." “The principal punch will be delivered by the Air Force" — the ships would be in a support role. ✈️⚡ 🛑 "(Many of those lusting for war with Iran believe that they) have an opportunity to do to Iran what we had aimed to do against Russia" - completely destroy the state. Do not miss this sobering analysis—WATCH the full clip NOW on Daniel Davis Deep Dive! 👉 👉 #IranWar #USForeignPolicy #Netanyahu #MacgregorAnalysis #Geopolitics #MiddleEastCrisis #RegionalWar

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

27,017 views • 5 months ago

⚠️ BREAKING GRAVITY: Col. Douglas Macgregor warns — Iran WILL NOT SURRENDER! This is not just another conflict. "For Iran, this is an existential war." "They will not submit." Col. Douglas Macgregor ( Douglas Macgregor) says, "They [Iran] will not recognize Israeli” domination over Iran, nor will they become a vassal state in the Middle East, submissive to Washington or Tel Aviv, “no matter how much we threaten them." "They absolutely understand how much tonnage of bombs (the U.S. has in the region that could be used to bomb then) but “they will not capitulate." Macgregor exposes the dangerous miscalculation: Massive US/Israeli military buildup won't force Iran to give up and it’s not enough combat power (absent a large ground force) to force submission. Trying anyway risks everything. Watch the full eye-opening clip NOW before it's too late 👇 [ ] 👉#Iran #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #DouglasMacgregor #DeepDive
1:23

⚠️ BREAKING GRAVITY: Col. Douglas Macgregor warns — Iran WILL NOT SURRENDER! This is not just another conflict. "For Iran, this is an existential war." "They will not submit." Col. Douglas Macgregor ( Douglas Macgregor) says, "They [Iran] will not recognize Israeli” domination over Iran, nor will they become a vassal state in the Middle East, submissive to Washington or Tel Aviv, “no matter how much we threaten them." "They absolutely understand how much tonnage of bombs (the U.S. has in the region that could be used to bomb then) but “they will not capitulate." Macgregor exposes the dangerous miscalculation: Massive US/Israeli military buildup won't force Iran to give up and it’s not enough combat power (absent a large ground force) to force submission. Trying anyway risks everything. Watch the full eye-opening clip NOW before it's too late 👇 [ ] 👉#Iran #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #DouglasMacgregor #DeepDive

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

28,511 views • 4 months ago

🔥 “THIS IS THE ISRAEL‑FIRST ADMINISTRATION.” — COL. MACGREGOR Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) makes the strategic reality clear: "if we were truly interested in the United States, we would not have attacked Iran. It just was not in our interest to do so." He points to a troubling shift in national leadership, stating: "people are now reaching the conclusion that we are not in charge of our own foreign policy." Col. Douglas Macgregor describes the administration’s posture as an "Israel-first administration," despite public attempts by officials to convince the citizenry otherwise. This failure in U.S. strategy is fueling the ongoing Middle East conflict, prioritizing external agendas while the American public remains largely sideline 👉 Watch the full clip from Daniel Davis Deep Dive: 🏷️ #IranWar #MiddleEastConflict #USStrategy #DouglasMacgregor #DanielDavis #ForeignPolicy #NationalSecurity #Geopolitics #Israel #DeepDive
1:02

🔥 “THIS IS THE ISRAEL‑FIRST ADMINISTRATION.” — COL. MACGREGOR Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) makes the strategic reality clear: "if we were truly interested in the United States, we would not have attacked Iran. It just was not in our interest to do so." He points to a troubling shift in national leadership, stating: "people are now reaching the conclusion that we are not in charge of our own foreign policy." Col. Douglas Macgregor describes the administration’s posture as an "Israel-first administration," despite public attempts by officials to convince the citizenry otherwise. This failure in U.S. strategy is fueling the ongoing Middle East conflict, prioritizing external agendas while the American public remains largely sideline 👉 Watch the full clip from Daniel Davis Deep Dive: 🏷️ #IranWar #MiddleEastConflict #USStrategy #DouglasMacgregor #DanielDavis #ForeignPolicy #NationalSecurity #Geopolitics #Israel #DeepDive

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

27,580 views • 1 month ago

Rubio said the US attacked Iran to protect its military bases and the countries where they are located. ‘You know why we have bases in Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, all these places? All these bases are there because these countries are afraid that Iran will attack them. If Iran was not a threat to the region, if the Iranian regime – and I’m not talking about the Iranian people, but the regime – was not a threat to the region, we would not have any bases there. So, yes, we will defend ourselves – because they are threatening to attack. And we have achieved our goals. We are ready to discuss this peacefully, diplomatically. We have been ready to do so for several days now.’ - SK
1:20

Rubio said the US attacked Iran to protect its military bases and the countries where they are located. ‘You know why we have bases in Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, all these places? All these bases are there because these countries are afraid that Iran will attack them. If Iran was not a threat to the region, if the Iranian regime – and I’m not talking about the Iranian people, but the regime – was not a threat to the region, we would not have any bases there. So, yes, we will defend ourselves – because they are threatening to attack. And we have achieved our goals. We are ready to discuss this peacefully, diplomatically. We have been ready to do so for several days now.’ - SK

Zlatti71

117,395 views • 1 year ago

The Persian Gulf is on the brink of a decade-long shutdown. ⚠️ Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) warns that the current U.S. strategy has backed Iran into a corner where "there will be no capitulation" and "no surrender ceremony." If US commanders were to execute a military operation designed to put Trump’s threat to “destroy” the Iranian civilization into action - especially if they physically tried to force open the Strait by escorting civilian vessels - it would b risking massive US naval losses and severe regional escalation. Iran has signaled that any attack on their soil will lead them to "wipe all of it out on the Western coast." We are facing a potential "decade of stoppage" in energy production that would cause the whole world to "suffer terribly." Macgregor's blunt assessment of the current path: "It's just not going to work." The stakes for the global economy have never been higher. 📉 Watch the full, urgent breakdown on Daniel Davis Deep Dive. 👇 👉 #IranWar #USStrategy #DouglasMacgregor #MiddleEastConflict #PersianGulf #EnergySecurity #Geopolitics #NationalSecurity #GlobalEconomy #DanielDavisDeepDive
1:13

The Persian Gulf is on the brink of a decade-long shutdown. ⚠️ Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) warns that the current U.S. strategy has backed Iran into a corner where "there will be no capitulation" and "no surrender ceremony." If US commanders were to execute a military operation designed to put Trump’s threat to “destroy” the Iranian civilization into action - especially if they physically tried to force open the Strait by escorting civilian vessels - it would b risking massive US naval losses and severe regional escalation. Iran has signaled that any attack on their soil will lead them to "wipe all of it out on the Western coast." We are facing a potential "decade of stoppage" in energy production that would cause the whole world to "suffer terribly." Macgregor's blunt assessment of the current path: "It's just not going to work." The stakes for the global economy have never been higher. 📉 Watch the full, urgent breakdown on Daniel Davis Deep Dive. 👇 👉 #IranWar #USStrategy #DouglasMacgregor #MiddleEastConflict #PersianGulf #EnergySecurity #Geopolitics #NationalSecurity #GlobalEconomy #DanielDavisDeepDive

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

107,229 views • 3 months ago

🚨 Are We Sleepwalking Into Israel’s War, Not America’s? 🚨 Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) drops the truth on the push for war with Iran: “This has nothing to do with the United States of America. This is 'Israel first' in action.” “The Israelis don't care about that [regional fallout]. They would welcome that... anything that leads to the disintegration, destruction of the Muslim states in the region as a good thing (from their point of view).” “And again, the Israelis are happy with (regional chaos) because they have no particular use or like for the Europeans either.” A 10-day bombing campaign could shatter Iran—'could' but not guaranteed 'would' --- yet may also ignite a regional war, massive refugee waves, and chaos Europe can't handle. This is “Israel-first” strategy risking American lives, treasure, and stability. Watch the full clip NOW before it's too late 👇 👉 #IranWar #RegionalWar #IsraelFirst #Macgregor #Geopolits #MiddleEastCrisis
1:38

🚨 Are We Sleepwalking Into Israel’s War, Not America’s? 🚨 Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) drops the truth on the push for war with Iran: “This has nothing to do with the United States of America. This is 'Israel first' in action.” “The Israelis don't care about that [regional fallout]. They would welcome that... anything that leads to the disintegration, destruction of the Muslim states in the region as a good thing (from their point of view).” “And again, the Israelis are happy with (regional chaos) because they have no particular use or like for the Europeans either.” A 10-day bombing campaign could shatter Iran—'could' but not guaranteed 'would' --- yet may also ignite a regional war, massive refugee waves, and chaos Europe can't handle. This is “Israel-first” strategy risking American lives, treasure, and stability. Watch the full clip NOW before it's too late 👇 👉 #IranWar #RegionalWar #IsraelFirst #Macgregor #Geopolits #MiddleEastCrisis

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

38,298 views • 5 months ago

The American public is being kept in the dark about the true cost of the Iran war ⚠️ Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) pulls no punches in this frank breakdown, stating, "No one has told us the truth from the beginning of this operation until now." While officials brag about having already defeated Iran, Macgregor warns that Iran is far from defeated, and more importantly, the current U.S. strategy is "counterproductive" if not outright "insane." Strategic failure is being masked by "accountant" spreadsheets of targets hit. Macgregor compares the operation to a surgeon declaring victory while the patient dies on the table. He claims the administration is avoiding the "humiliation of admitting that we've done all that we can do" and cannot defeat Iran militarily. "We've never had a truthful picture of what we have and have not accomplished." This cycle of misinformation will not be able to mask the fraud of the narrative forever, as the truth will always manifest. The bigger risk, however, is that this deception carries a real risk of further escalation. 📉 Watch the full, urgent analysis on Daniel Davis Deep Dive. 👇 👉 #IranWar #USStrategy #DouglasMacgregor #MiddleEastConflict #PersianGulf #NationalSecurity #ForeignPolicy #BreakingNews #DanielDavisDeepDive #Geopolitics
1:04

The American public is being kept in the dark about the true cost of the Iran war ⚠️ Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) pulls no punches in this frank breakdown, stating, "No one has told us the truth from the beginning of this operation until now." While officials brag about having already defeated Iran, Macgregor warns that Iran is far from defeated, and more importantly, the current U.S. strategy is "counterproductive" if not outright "insane." Strategic failure is being masked by "accountant" spreadsheets of targets hit. Macgregor compares the operation to a surgeon declaring victory while the patient dies on the table. He claims the administration is avoiding the "humiliation of admitting that we've done all that we can do" and cannot defeat Iran militarily. "We've never had a truthful picture of what we have and have not accomplished." This cycle of misinformation will not be able to mask the fraud of the narrative forever, as the truth will always manifest. The bigger risk, however, is that this deception carries a real risk of further escalation. 📉 Watch the full, urgent analysis on Daniel Davis Deep Dive. 👇 👉 #IranWar #USStrategy #DouglasMacgregor #MiddleEastConflict #PersianGulf #NationalSecurity #ForeignPolicy #BreakingNews #DanielDavisDeepDive #Geopolitics

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

45,990 views • 3 months ago

🚨Iran’s🇮🇷 DEVASTATING Capabilities to strike the US🇺🇸: Cyber-attacks, Super EMPs…NUKES? ‘Iran has a number of options to attack the US, both in terms of attacking US forces in the 50 military bases we have in the region, and US carrier strike groups. They have hypersonic missiles which we cannot intercept. If they were proven accurate enough, it’s very likely they could strike a US carrier. Probably they couldn’t sink it, but they could cause it to catch fire and limp away. That would be a tremendous blow to US prestige. Other things they can do: they have tremendous offensive cyber capabilities. They’ve demonstrated capability to take down our water purification distribution system, at least on a regional basis. I would assess that they have the capability to shut down America’s entire critical infrastructure for a period of weeks, perhaps months. And that would be devastating to the US. I don’t think there’s anyone that doubts they have that capability. In terms of nuclear capabilities, I assess that they likely already have nuclear weapons. Whether they have the miniaturisation technology necessary to put them atop missiles is unclear. But I think it’s likely they had a nuclear test in North Korea as recently as 2017. They also may likely have super EMP satellites. Super EMP is a way that Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran could potentially take out all US critical infrastructure at the beginning of a conflict, or even, in the case of Russia or China, before a nuclear first strike against the United States. So those are all devastating capabilities that could potentially kill tens of millions of Americans. And there’s not a lot the US can do about it, because US leaders have spent so much time with offensive power projection, with conventional forces around the world, and neglected our homeland and strategic defences here at home.’ -David Pyne, Deputy Director of the US Task Force on National and Homeland Security, on Going Underground
2:40

🚨Iran’s🇮🇷 DEVASTATING Capabilities to strike the US🇺🇸: Cyber-attacks, Super EMPs…NUKES? ‘Iran has a number of options to attack the US, both in terms of attacking US forces in the 50 military bases we have in the region, and US carrier strike groups. They have hypersonic missiles which we cannot intercept. If they were proven accurate enough, it’s very likely they could strike a US carrier. Probably they couldn’t sink it, but they could cause it to catch fire and limp away. That would be a tremendous blow to US prestige. Other things they can do: they have tremendous offensive cyber capabilities. They’ve demonstrated capability to take down our water purification distribution system, at least on a regional basis. I would assess that they have the capability to shut down America’s entire critical infrastructure for a period of weeks, perhaps months. And that would be devastating to the US. I don’t think there’s anyone that doubts they have that capability. In terms of nuclear capabilities, I assess that they likely already have nuclear weapons. Whether they have the miniaturisation technology necessary to put them atop missiles is unclear. But I think it’s likely they had a nuclear test in North Korea as recently as 2017. They also may likely have super EMP satellites. Super EMP is a way that Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran could potentially take out all US critical infrastructure at the beginning of a conflict, or even, in the case of Russia or China, before a nuclear first strike against the United States. So those are all devastating capabilities that could potentially kill tens of millions of Americans. And there’s not a lot the US can do about it, because US leaders have spent so much time with offensive power projection, with conventional forces around the world, and neglected our homeland and strategic defences here at home.’ -David Pyne, Deputy Director of the US Task Force on National and Homeland Security, on Going Underground

Afshin Rattansi

80,346 views • 6 months ago

🚨 "The demands that President Trump has been making are not his. They never were. They are Israeli demands." And the reasons for going to war had (have) nothing to do with American national security. The war is a net loss, regardless of how many targets our military destroys. 🔥– Col Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) reveals the truth behind the Iran showdown. What the White House is demanding of Iran and Israel requires: "No enrichment of any kind... dismantle your ballistic missile inventory... And you can't have any friends or allies in the region." – This type of impossible ultimatum guarantees conflict. "The Iranians are not going to (comply with those terms). They're not going to surrender." We are not winning this war, regardless of the many optimistic claims in U.S. media. The red lines Trump and Netanyahu have set make peace IMPOSSIBLE! 🇮🇷🇮🇱 Watch the FULL CLIP now 👉 Don't miss this urgent breakdown [ ] 👉 #IranWar #TrumpWar #IsraelDemands #MiddleEastCrisis #IranNuclear #NoSurrender #DouglasMacgregor
0:55

🚨 "The demands that President Trump has been making are not his. They never were. They are Israeli demands." And the reasons for going to war had (have) nothing to do with American national security. The war is a net loss, regardless of how many targets our military destroys. 🔥– Col Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) reveals the truth behind the Iran showdown. What the White House is demanding of Iran and Israel requires: "No enrichment of any kind... dismantle your ballistic missile inventory... And you can't have any friends or allies in the region." – This type of impossible ultimatum guarantees conflict. "The Iranians are not going to (comply with those terms). They're not going to surrender." We are not winning this war, regardless of the many optimistic claims in U.S. media. The red lines Trump and Netanyahu have set make peace IMPOSSIBLE! 🇮🇷🇮🇱 Watch the FULL CLIP now 👉 Don't miss this urgent breakdown [ ] 👉 #IranWar #TrumpWar #IsraelDemands #MiddleEastCrisis #IranNuclear #NoSurrender #DouglasMacgregor

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

17,012 views • 4 months ago

Kellogg convinces Americans that Iran is already suffering a defeat, and the US has not suffered any damage. - Iran is suffering a serious defeat. In fact, it's already the third day, and they haven't demonstrated that they are capable of causing us harm or damaging any of our facilities. - An article titled 'The US is rushing to complete the Iranian mission before we run out of ammunition' was published in the Wall Street Journal. Is there a risk that we will run out of ammunition before the operation is completed? - No, I don't think so. I believe we have the necessary reserve ammunition. If necessary, we can transfer reserves from other directions. I'm sure we have enough resources to complete the task. They wouldn't have started this operation, knowing everything they know, if they didn't have sufficient reserve firepower. So I'm absolutely sure that this mission will be completed. 👍 Skabeeva in Max
0:46

Kellogg convinces Americans that Iran is already suffering a defeat, and the US has not suffered any damage. - Iran is suffering a serious defeat. In fact, it's already the third day, and they haven't demonstrated that they are capable of causing us harm or damaging any of our facilities. - An article titled 'The US is rushing to complete the Iranian mission before we run out of ammunition' was published in the Wall Street Journal. Is there a risk that we will run out of ammunition before the operation is completed? - No, I don't think so. I believe we have the necessary reserve ammunition. If necessary, we can transfer reserves from other directions. I'm sure we have enough resources to complete the task. They wouldn't have started this operation, knowing everything they know, if they didn't have sufficient reserve firepower. So I'm absolutely sure that this mission will be completed. 👍 Skabeeva in Max

Zlatti71

17,619 views • 4 months ago

Netanyahu: Iran has launched an intercontinental ballistic missile towards Diego Garcia "That is 4000 km. I have always warned. Now they have that capability. They are penetrating deep into Europe. They have already targeted the European country Cyprus. They are taking everything under aim," he believes. 🇬🇧 Meanwhile, The Telegraph writes that attacks on the British base in the Indian Ocean, used by the US Air Force, have demonstrated the capability of Iranian missiles to reach London. The Israel Army warns that Iran may soon attack Europe. ( The US and Israel strongly want Europe to get involved in a war with Iran) Earlier, suspicious missiles fell on facilities that Iran, according to its claims, did not attack (Azerbaijan, Turkey). Experts have repeatedly warned about possible false flag attacks to change the mood in Europe and the US.
0:19

Netanyahu: Iran has launched an intercontinental ballistic missile towards Diego Garcia "That is 4000 km. I have always warned. Now they have that capability. They are penetrating deep into Europe. They have already targeted the European country Cyprus. They are taking everything under aim," he believes. 🇬🇧 Meanwhile, The Telegraph writes that attacks on the British base in the Indian Ocean, used by the US Air Force, have demonstrated the capability of Iranian missiles to reach London. The Israel Army warns that Iran may soon attack Europe. ( The US and Israel strongly want Europe to get involved in a war with Iran) Earlier, suspicious missiles fell on facilities that Iran, according to its claims, did not attack (Azerbaijan, Turkey). Experts have repeatedly warned about possible false flag attacks to change the mood in Europe and the US.

Sprinter Press

25,856 views • 4 months ago

What is Netanyahu expected to say to the president? The main problem with the ballistic-missile story is that the Iranians have caught on to the daylight—the gap—between Israel and the United States. What happened here is that Donald Trump gave his word and then broke it. "We will not allow Iran to have nuclear weapons." But he didn’t talk about conventional weapons—the ballistic missiles that threaten Israel. They threaten Israel to such an extent that Netanyahu himself, in a video announcing to the Israeli people that he was launching Operation Nation of Lions, said that two existential threats had developed. The nuclear threat—you’ve known about for years—but also the threat of thousands of ballistic missiles. What has happened since then? The Iranians are not acting at all on the nuclear front, as far as we know. They have not even extracted the enriched material buried underground. But they are very much intensifying their experiments with ballistic missiles. Either because they think it is threatening, or because, as Netanyahu says, it is an existential threat to Israel. We also have a race between the number of their missiles and the number of our missiles—and let’s say that both countries need to recover on this issue. Let’s ask the question now, and here I don’t have an answer. When Netanyahu goes to Washington to talk to Trump about this, is he talking to him about a combined attack—which seems a bit far-fetched to me, because the Americans really have no intention of getting involved in a conventional weapons conflict anywhere in the world; otherwise they would never get out of it—or is he content to give Israel permission to attack on its own, with the U.S. providing a defensive umbrella? One. Two, it should also be said, in this context, that there is a big debate in the Israeli cabinet and at the top about whether it is possible to launch an attack every six months. You cannot—unlike the nuclear project—you cannot eliminate the Iranian ballistic threat. Is it sustainable to come every six months, eight months, and launch another round, which includes them firing at us, all the flights leaving Israel, and all the implications for the economy? There is no decision in Israel. There is no decision in the U.S. that's what they will discuss.
1:46

What is Netanyahu expected to say to the president? The main problem with the ballistic-missile story is that the Iranians have caught on to the daylight—the gap—between Israel and the United States. What happened here is that Donald Trump gave his word and then broke it. "We will not allow Iran to have nuclear weapons." But he didn’t talk about conventional weapons—the ballistic missiles that threaten Israel. They threaten Israel to such an extent that Netanyahu himself, in a video announcing to the Israeli people that he was launching Operation Nation of Lions, said that two existential threats had developed. The nuclear threat—you’ve known about for years—but also the threat of thousands of ballistic missiles. What has happened since then? The Iranians are not acting at all on the nuclear front, as far as we know. They have not even extracted the enriched material buried underground. But they are very much intensifying their experiments with ballistic missiles. Either because they think it is threatening, or because, as Netanyahu says, it is an existential threat to Israel. We also have a race between the number of their missiles and the number of our missiles—and let’s say that both countries need to recover on this issue. Let’s ask the question now, and here I don’t have an answer. When Netanyahu goes to Washington to talk to Trump about this, is he talking to him about a combined attack—which seems a bit far-fetched to me, because the Americans really have no intention of getting involved in a conventional weapons conflict anywhere in the world; otherwise they would never get out of it—or is he content to give Israel permission to attack on its own, with the U.S. providing a defensive umbrella? One. Two, it should also be said, in this context, that there is a big debate in the Israeli cabinet and at the top about whether it is possible to launch an attack every six months. You cannot—unlike the nuclear project—you cannot eliminate the Iranian ballistic threat. Is it sustainable to come every six months, eight months, and launch another round, which includes them firing at us, all the flights leaving Israel, and all the implications for the economy? There is no decision in Israel. There is no decision in the U.S. that's what they will discuss.

Amit Segal

273,898 views • 7 months ago

“I think we had false expectations that Iran would fall apart in 48 to 72 hours… We’re already running out of missiles in places like UAE and Qatar… The Israelis have shot a lot of missiles and I don’t think they can keep this up indefinitely.” Retired U.S. Army Colonel and former Secretary of Defense advisor Douglas Macgregor warns the Iran War will be decided by logistics, as reports suggest American missile stockpiles are rapidly being depleted. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on Spectrum and YouTube TV Today!
1:31

“I think we had false expectations that Iran would fall apart in 48 to 72 hours… We’re already running out of missiles in places like UAE and Qatar… The Israelis have shot a lot of missiles and I don’t think they can keep this up indefinitely.” Retired U.S. Army Colonel and former Secretary of Defense advisor Douglas Macgregor warns the Iran War will be decided by logistics, as reports suggest American missile stockpiles are rapidly being depleted. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on Spectrum and YouTube TV Today!

One America News

646,069 views • 4 months ago

🚨 Iran’s Deadline Looms: A Nuclear Threat — or Something Even Worse? Is the Iran war about to witness a shift toward some as-yet unseen new weaponry? 🚨 Col Doug Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) breaks down the looming deadline, warning that while a nuclear strike is unlikely, we could see a “hypersonic missile that is extraordinarily destructive in its impact.” Macgregor cautions that such an escalation won't open the Strait of Hormuz; instead, “the strait of Hormuz is already open to the people that do business with Iran,” and U.S. actions won't change that. 📉 The regional fallout could be catastrophic, with Macgregor predicting if Trump makes good on his threat to attack Iranian energy and civilian infrastruture, Iran will “respond in kind by destroying all the infrastructure on the west side of the Persian Gulf.” ⚠️ Furthermore, he warns of a massive regional miscalculation regarding Turkey, noting the Turks possess “the largest military establishment on the ground in the region” and are increasingly enraged. The current U.S. strategy faces a grim reality: powerful weapons won't solve a conflict that should never have been chosen and has already slipped from Western control. Watch the full, high-stakes breakdown here: 👉 #IranWar #USStrategy #MiddleEastConflict #NationalSecurity #DougMacgregor #DanielDavisDeepDive #Geopolitics #Hypersonic #StraitOfHormuz #Turkey #PersianGulf #MilitaryAnalysis
2:21

🚨 Iran’s Deadline Looms: A Nuclear Threat — or Something Even Worse? Is the Iran war about to witness a shift toward some as-yet unseen new weaponry? 🚨 Col Doug Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) breaks down the looming deadline, warning that while a nuclear strike is unlikely, we could see a “hypersonic missile that is extraordinarily destructive in its impact.” Macgregor cautions that such an escalation won't open the Strait of Hormuz; instead, “the strait of Hormuz is already open to the people that do business with Iran,” and U.S. actions won't change that. 📉 The regional fallout could be catastrophic, with Macgregor predicting if Trump makes good on his threat to attack Iranian energy and civilian infrastruture, Iran will “respond in kind by destroying all the infrastructure on the west side of the Persian Gulf.” ⚠️ Furthermore, he warns of a massive regional miscalculation regarding Turkey, noting the Turks possess “the largest military establishment on the ground in the region” and are increasingly enraged. The current U.S. strategy faces a grim reality: powerful weapons won't solve a conflict that should never have been chosen and has already slipped from Western control. Watch the full, high-stakes breakdown here: 👉 #IranWar #USStrategy #MiddleEastConflict #NationalSecurity #DougMacgregor #DanielDavisDeepDive #Geopolitics #Hypersonic #StraitOfHormuz #Turkey #PersianGulf #MilitaryAnalysis

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

62,506 views • 3 months ago

🚨 The U.S. Is Trapped In A War It Cannot Sustain In the latest Daniel Davis Deep Dive, Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) delivers a blistering critique of current U.S. strategy in the Middle East conflict. As the Iran war drags on, Macgregor warns that Washington’s rigid adherence to political promises—not military reality—is driving the nation toward an economic and strategic breaking point. On the limits of U.S. power, Macgregor warns: "I think the bond market in particular will collapse before he can print the additional billions that will be needed to sustain our presence over there." He argues that Iran is not the aggressor in the eyes of the world, noting: "We are the ones who are held responsible for the stoppage, the blockage. Remember, until we attacked, the Gulf was open." The core obstacle to peace, according to Macgregor, is domestic influence: "He couldn't make it stick because of Netanyahu and Netanyahu's backers who are billionaires in the United States." With global opinion siding with Tehran, the U.S. finds itself increasingly isolated, while Iran remains committed to staying the course to the bitter end. 👇 Watch the full clip now for a vital assessment of why this conflict may end in collapse rather than a deal. 🏷️ #IranWar #USStrategy #MiddleEastConflict #Geopolitics #DanielDavisDeepDive #NationalSecurity #ForeignPolicy #MilitaryStrategy #Diplomacy #Macgregor #TrumpAdministration #EconomicCollapse
2:41

🚨 The U.S. Is Trapped In A War It Cannot Sustain In the latest Daniel Davis Deep Dive, Col. Douglas Macgregor (Douglas Macgregor) delivers a blistering critique of current U.S. strategy in the Middle East conflict. As the Iran war drags on, Macgregor warns that Washington’s rigid adherence to political promises—not military reality—is driving the nation toward an economic and strategic breaking point. On the limits of U.S. power, Macgregor warns: "I think the bond market in particular will collapse before he can print the additional billions that will be needed to sustain our presence over there." He argues that Iran is not the aggressor in the eyes of the world, noting: "We are the ones who are held responsible for the stoppage, the blockage. Remember, until we attacked, the Gulf was open." The core obstacle to peace, according to Macgregor, is domestic influence: "He couldn't make it stick because of Netanyahu and Netanyahu's backers who are billionaires in the United States." With global opinion siding with Tehran, the U.S. finds itself increasingly isolated, while Iran remains committed to staying the course to the bitter end. 👇 Watch the full clip now for a vital assessment of why this conflict may end in collapse rather than a deal. 🏷️ #IranWar #USStrategy #MiddleEastConflict #Geopolitics #DanielDavisDeepDive #NationalSecurity #ForeignPolicy #MilitaryStrategy #Diplomacy #Macgregor #TrumpAdministration #EconomicCollapse

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

18,168 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 "Today will be the BIGGEST BOMBING of Iran so far" — Pete Hegset 🔵 "Iran has no air defense, no air force, no navy, their missile volume is reduced by 90%, they are desperate in the Strait of Hormuz" — Hegset. "Our plan is to defeat, destroy, and disable all their significant military capabilities at a pace the world has never seen before" 🔵 "The only thing currently stopping traffic in the strait is that Iran is shooting at ships," — Pete Hegset. Didn't he just a few minutes ago say that Iran no longer has a NAVY? 🔵 "Soon ALL Iranian defense companies will be DESTROYED" — Hegset "The entire production of ballistic missiles in Iran is destroyed... We are shooting down the missiles they still have in stock, but more importantly, we are preventing them from making new ones" The next US targets are Iranian infrastructure 🔵 Hegset on the strike at the school in Minab: "We do not target civilians. Iran does. We will investigate and get to the truth, and we will share it when we have it."
0:54

🇺🇸🇮🇷 "Today will be the BIGGEST BOMBING of Iran so far" — Pete Hegset 🔵 "Iran has no air defense, no air force, no navy, their missile volume is reduced by 90%, they are desperate in the Strait of Hormuz" — Hegset. "Our plan is to defeat, destroy, and disable all their significant military capabilities at a pace the world has never seen before" 🔵 "The only thing currently stopping traffic in the strait is that Iran is shooting at ships," — Pete Hegset. Didn't he just a few minutes ago say that Iran no longer has a NAVY? 🔵 "Soon ALL Iranian defense companies will be DESTROYED" — Hegset "The entire production of ballistic missiles in Iran is destroyed... We are shooting down the missiles they still have in stock, but more importantly, we are preventing them from making new ones" The next US targets are Iranian infrastructure 🔵 Hegset on the strike at the school in Minab: "We do not target civilians. Iran does. We will investigate and get to the truth, and we will share it when we have it."

Sprinter Press

14,576 views • 4 months ago

☢️Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: ‘IRAN HAS ALREADY WON…if they want nuclear weapons, they will make one.’ 'I think Iran is perched right now exactly where Haaretz said they were. All they have to do to win is not lose, and All the United States and Israel have to do is achieve a spectacular victory, and they aren't going to do that. So Iran’s already won. The question is, How much damage is Donald Trump and what’s left of the American military going to be done to in the interim? And How much damage is going to be done to that military, particularly its maritime elements? They have not unleashed anything significant yet on a US warship. They could and they might, and that's the end of that warship if they do. The carrier is holding off at least 1300 kilometres. Not just because of range. Because there are some missiles that can go that far. It's because the carrier is so capable of getting up to flight speed so fast that once it has a warning of a missile launch, it can itself defend fairly successfully without subsurface, surface, or airborne assets. If the carrier moves at the right moment, at the speed it's capable of achieving, it's going to be very hard to hit it in that terminal phase. But they would ultimately fail with a hypersonic missile. I take my experience from Kang Sok-Ju and Kye-Gwan in North Korea in October 2002, when we went to present them with an economic package the President and even the Vice President thought would be persuasive in getting them to back off their nuclear programme. Kye-Gwan looked right at us and said…we already have nuclear weapons. So I know how we were fooled by North Korea. I know North Korea in 2002 was working with Iran, not just on underground fortifications but also on nuclear weapons, how to match warhead to missile. So Ted, I think, is right. If the Iranians want a nuclear weapon, they'll make one.’ — Former Chief of Staff at the State Department, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson on the latest episode of New Order Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
2:55

☢️Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: ‘IRAN HAS ALREADY WON…if they want nuclear weapons, they will make one.’ 'I think Iran is perched right now exactly where Haaretz said they were. All they have to do to win is not lose, and All the United States and Israel have to do is achieve a spectacular victory, and they aren't going to do that. So Iran’s already won. The question is, How much damage is Donald Trump and what’s left of the American military going to be done to in the interim? And How much damage is going to be done to that military, particularly its maritime elements? They have not unleashed anything significant yet on a US warship. They could and they might, and that's the end of that warship if they do. The carrier is holding off at least 1300 kilometres. Not just because of range. Because there are some missiles that can go that far. It's because the carrier is so capable of getting up to flight speed so fast that once it has a warning of a missile launch, it can itself defend fairly successfully without subsurface, surface, or airborne assets. If the carrier moves at the right moment, at the speed it's capable of achieving, it's going to be very hard to hit it in that terminal phase. But they would ultimately fail with a hypersonic missile. I take my experience from Kang Sok-Ju and Kye-Gwan in North Korea in October 2002, when we went to present them with an economic package the President and even the Vice President thought would be persuasive in getting them to back off their nuclear programme. Kye-Gwan looked right at us and said…we already have nuclear weapons. So I know how we were fooled by North Korea. I know North Korea in 2002 was working with Iran, not just on underground fortifications but also on nuclear weapons, how to match warhead to missile. So Ted, I think, is right. If the Iranians want a nuclear weapon, they'll make one.’ — Former Chief of Staff at the State Department, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson on the latest episode of New Order Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

48,243 views • 3 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Secretary Rubio is calling on Iranians to overthrow their OWN regime, now that the US has the regime on their knees "We would LOVE to see this regime be replaced, and as the President said, he would LOVE for the people of Iran to use this an opportunity to RISE UP and remove these leaders." "The bottom line is, no matter who governs that country a year from now, they will NOT have these ballistic missiles and they will NOT have these drones to threaten us."
1:04

🚨 JUST IN: Secretary Rubio is calling on Iranians to overthrow their OWN regime, now that the US has the regime on their knees "We would LOVE to see this regime be replaced, and as the President said, he would LOVE for the people of Iran to use this an opportunity to RISE UP and remove these leaders." "The bottom line is, no matter who governs that country a year from now, they will NOT have these ballistic missiles and they will NOT have these drones to threaten us."

Nick Sortor

191,599 views • 4 months ago

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on March 2: "The purpose of this is to destroy that missile capability. Why does Iran want that ballistic missile capability? What they are trying to do and have been trying to do for a very long time is build a conventional weapons capability as a shield where they can hide behind. Meaning there would come a point where they have so many conventional missiles, so many drones, and it can inflict so much damage that no one can do anything about their nuclear program. That is what they were trying to do, is put themselves in a place of immunity where the damage they could inflict on the region would be so high that no one can do anything about their nuclear program or their nuclear ambitions."
0:34

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on March 2: "The purpose of this is to destroy that missile capability. Why does Iran want that ballistic missile capability? What they are trying to do and have been trying to do for a very long time is build a conventional weapons capability as a shield where they can hide behind. Meaning there would come a point where they have so many conventional missiles, so many drones, and it can inflict so much damage that no one can do anything about their nuclear program. That is what they were trying to do, is put themselves in a place of immunity where the damage they could inflict on the region would be so high that no one can do anything about their nuclear program or their nuclear ambitions."

Batya Ungar-Sargon

31,181 views • 1 month ago