Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Arnab never disappoints! "Bring Back Original Preamble & Constitution. On whose instructions, terms 'Socialist & 'Secular' were inserted by Indira Ghandy through utmost unfair means by imposing Emergency?" Bharat must get Original Preamble back in true respect to Dr Ambedkar Ji

134,491 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von SK Chakraborty
SK Chakrabortyvor 1 Jahr

He sees 16 sunrises and 16 sunsets per day.😇😇 PM Modi speaks to Group Captain #ShubhanshuShukla, who is aboard the International Space Station PM Modi asks, "Parikrama (Circumambulation) is an ancient tradition of India. You have the privilege of circumambulating Mother Earth. Which part of the Earth do you think you are passing over right now?" Shubhanshu replies, "Honourable Prime Minister, I don’t have that information at the moment, but a little while ago, I was looking out the window and we were flying above the Hawaii. We orbit the Earth 16 times a day, it’s an absolutely astonishing process." From @republic #shubhanshushuklainspace

Profilbild von SK Chakraborty
SK Chakrabortyvor 1 Jahr

A 4,500-year-old civilisation in Rajasthan unearthed by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). It has discovered statues, utensils and metal weapons dating back to the Mahabharata era and the Maurya and Shunga dynasties. ASI identified a spot in Bahaj village in Deeg district, around 40 kilometres from Bharatpur, where some evidence related to ancient civilisation was found. Notably, Bahaj village is a significant spot as it is a part of the Braj region, which also comprises Mathura in Uttar Pradesh. During the excavation that went on for about six months, ASI officials found statues, utensils and metal weapons dating back to as early as 2,500 BC. A human skeleton was found during the excavation and was sent to Israel to ascertain how old it was. (From India Today ) Vraja(Braj) was first mentioned in Rigveda, and in Sanskrit it means a pasture, shelter or resort for cattle. The twin cities, Mathura and Vrindavan, which are associated with Shri Krishna are main centers of Braj region.

Profilbild von SK Chakraborty
SK Chakrabortyvor 1 Jahr

Illegal arms factory at Mahilabad, UP. Salauddin was running an illegal arms factory. 3,000 guns and 20 sacks containing 50,000 cartridges, six daggers, two knives, nine axes and cleavers, recovered from Hakim Salauddin's illegal arms factory in Malihabad, on the outskirts of Lucknow. Hakeem Salauddin alias Lala, was not only manufacturing weapons at home but also sending them to Kashmir. His call detail records reportedly show contact with suspects in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), prompting the Uttar Pradesh Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) to initiate a parallel probe. From @ZeeNews

Profilbild von 🥀 Mrityunjay Tiwari
🥀 Mrityunjay Tiwarivor 1 Jahr

🔥 Absolutely right! The Original Preamble reflects Dr. Ambedkar Ji's true vision — not imposed ideologies during Emergency! 🛑 ‘Socialist’ & ‘Secular’ were inserted undemocratically. 🇮🇳 Time to restore the original spirit of Bharat’s Constitution! #BringBackOriginalPreamble #AmbedkarRespect #EmergencyInjustice

Profilbild von Bhupendranath
Bhupendranathvor 1 Jahr

डॉ अंबेडकर जी के प्रति सच्चे सम्मान के साथ भारत को मूल प्रस्तावना वापस मिलनी चाहिए

Profilbild von Times News Updates
Times News Updatesvor 1 Jahr

Time to undo the Emergency-era tampering—restore Dr. Ambedkar’s true vision for Bharat! 🇮🇳📜

Profilbild von MRaj 🇮🇳 PROUD HINDUSTANI
MRaj 🇮🇳 PROUD HINDUSTANIvor 1 Jahr

How @kharge wants Bharatiyas to forget about Emergency? The Blunders of CON parivar can neither be forgiven nor forgotten. @INCIndia @ArnabGoswamiRTv

Profilbild von SK Chakraborty
SK Chakrabortyvor 1 Jahr

People are pointing towards Covid-19 vaccination. Shefali Jariwala, the actress and model best known for her sizzling performance in the iconic music video ‘Kaanta Laga’, suddenly passed away on Friday at the age of 42, due to sudden cardiac arrest. Shefali is survived by her husband, Parag Tyagi, whom she married in 2014. Om Shanti🙏🙏

Profilbild von Barun Gupta
Barun Guptavor 1 Jahr

It is clear that Ambedkar didn't include 'secular' and 'socialist' in the constitution. Indira Gandhi included these for 1) Pleasing muslim vote bank and 2) Making OBCs happy as they could ask for quotas in jobs & institutions in future.

Ähnliche Videos

"India’s YOUTH should listen up-it’s true that Govts are being formed through vote chori" Why's Rahul Ghandy INSISTING on YOUTH? Because 'Students' were involved in Ri0ts for Regime Change in Nepal & Bangladesh? Same SCRIPT being planned? BUT 3 BIG DIFFERENCES. 1. In Nepal & Bangladesh there is Massive unemployment & low standards of education making the YOUTH vulnerable to get misguided & incited. In Bharat....only YOUTH from NSUI & Communist Students Unions are UNEMPLOYED & with low IQ and don't hold any public sympathy. Rest Bharatiya YOUTH is more concerned about their studies & better future. Sutiyas on Instagram don't even come out for Voting....and Rahul Ghandy expects them to come out to create unrest. 😂 2. There were massive allegations of Corruption & Misgovernance against Govts in Bangladesh & Nepal. Therefore, people didn't have any sympathy with Govts & it's leaders when they were being toppled. But in Bharat, it's clearly not the case & 70% approval rating of PM .Narendra Modi Ji even after 11 yrs is the clear proof. So any attempt made in Bangladesh/Nepal style won't get support from passive population. In fact, they won't even remain indifferent & may retaliate. 3. Bangladesh & Nepal didn't have PM in Modi Ji & HM in .Amit Shah Ji. BHARAT HAS BOTH & they both are MASTERS of STRATEGIES! So....Chill Rahul Ghandy. Your every attempt of spreading LIES will be countered & nullified through Constitutional Institutions including Judiciary....just like your LIES over SIR & Maharashtra Elections were dismantled by Supreme Court. Modi Sarkar won't fall....but you will be definitely led to Political Extinction. Ps- The Joker has fcuked up again. Says Vote Chori happened in Karnataka too. Someone pls remind him that CONgress is sitting Govt in Karnataka. 😂😂

BhikuMhatre

180,589 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Enough of Piddi Nonsense! US has lifted sanctions on Bharat's purchase of Russian Oil. WHAT DOES IT ACTUALLY MEAN? IT'S ABOUT LOGISTICS COSTS! (read full) बेअक्ल Piddis are relating it to 'Permission by US to buy Russian Oil'😂 Abe Sutiyon, Bharat never stopped buying Russian Oil. Neither before Nor now! Not even when Insane Trump was charging extra 25% Tariff. Even yesterday, Russian cargoes were diverted to Bharat—2 tankers carrying 1.4 million barrels of Urals. Imports from Russia actually rose about 6% in February. THEN WHAT'S THIS WAIVER OF SANCTION?👇 The answer lies in financial and logistical restrictions, not the oil purchase itself. Let’s break it down. --- 1️⃣ What the sanctions actually targeted The sanctions were mainly against payment systems, shipping, and insurance, not directly against Bharat buying oil. These measures were linked to the war after the Russian invasion of Ukraine and were imposed by the United States Department of the Treasury and allies. Restrictions affected: -Dollar transactions -Western ship insurers -Shipping companies -Some Russian banks So Bharat was buying oil, but the process became complicated and risky. 2️⃣ How Bharat managed earlier Bharat still imported Russian crude by: -Paying through non-dollar currencies (rupee, dirham etc.) -Using a shadow tanker fleet -Using non-Western insurance Companies like Indian Oil Corporation, Bharat Petroleum etc continued purchases. But this created: -Higher shipping costs -Payment delays -Legal risk for banks and traders 3️⃣ What the 30-day waiver changes The waiver temporarily removes the fear of secondary sanctions for entities dealing with Russian oil sold to India. This means for 30 days: ✔ Banks can process payments more freely ✔ Tankers and insurers face less legal risk ✔ Contracts can be signed without sanction fears ✔ Oil traders can move cargo faster So even though Bharat was buying oil earlier, the transaction now becomes smoother and cheaper. 4️⃣ Why it benefits Bharat During the waiver period: -Bharat can lock in long-term discounted contracts -Refiners can increase imports quickly -Shipping and payment costs reduce -Global traders become willing to deal again So Bharat can stockpile more discounted crude. 5️⃣ Strategic reality Bharat's stance has been very consistent under PM .Narendra Modi Ji: ➡ Bharat will buy oil based on national interest and energy security, not geopolitical pressure. And this policy helped Bharat: -Became one of the largest buyers of Russian crude -Reduced import costs significantly since 2022. ✅ In short: Bharat never stopped buying Russian oil, but the waiver reduces financial and legal friction, allowing Bharat to buy more easily, faster, and possibly cheaper. And This's what actually hurting Rahul Ghandy & his Slave CONgress. While world with struggle with Inflation, Bharat will zoom on these additional benefits. Bharat's Oil Exports will also increase as Iran has allowed Bharatiya ships to sail through Strait of Hormuz. What's worst? US has not allowed those waivers to China. It's adding more pain to agony faced by Rahul Ghandy. How can Bharat prosper when his MoU partner CCP is facing logistical & financial difficulties! It's okay, Jan-Nalayak! Learn to live with such agony & humiliation throughout your remaining life. That's Karma!

BhikuMhatre

22,522 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

HERE IS THE REAL ACCOUNT OF THE JULY 16TH 1969 MISSION TO THE MOON ACCORDING TO THE CLASSIFIED FILES: The footage WAS faked, BUT we DID go to the moon in 1969. Here is what REALLY Happened; On June 20th, almost a full month before, Neil Armstrong and company took off from Pine Gap Joint Operations base in Australia, touching down on June 24th. This was done so in the event the mission was a complete disaster, the US would avoid having it happen on National Television. There was real pictures and film taken from this mission to be used when they got back, to play it as "live footage" for the world. The plan was for the astronauts to then be sent back into Earth's Orbit before they were due back so they could do the "splash down" return for the whole World to see. HOWEVER, when the Astronauts Secretly returned to Earth on June 30th, it was determined that the video and photographic footage was ruined due to not being properly protected while traveling back through the Van Allen radiation belts. The only thing they had left was the original radio communications with Mission Control. In order to avoid international embarrassment and prove to the world the US still went to the Moon, they recreated the footage and used the actual radio communications that NASA had recorded. It was then that all three Astronauts were sent back into space on July 16th to be sent back into Orbit to await the Splash down for the cameras. It wasn't until they came back this second time that they were informed that they were not allowed to discuss any of the real details about what they encountered on their trip to the Moon. Forced to sign NDA's minutes before their press conference, where violating it was punishable by up to 10 years in prison and/or $1,000,000.00 in fines. All other missions to the Moon, countermeasures were in place to protect against damaged footage from the Van Allen radiation belts. THAT'S why the rest of the mission's footage looks differently than the recreated footage. *Only one video clip I have ever ran across has EVER told the true story. So I am attaching it to this RELEASE. The photos that you see from the Moon were NOT taken during Apollo 11. They were taken later, but most WERE observed by them in 1969. **So THIS is why the 1969 moon landing footage was faked, and it WASN'T because it didn't happen!** HERE IS THE ONLY VIDEO CLIP TO EVER GET IT RIGHT:

WHISTLEBLOWER

75,975 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

EXCLUSIVE & AN OPEN CHALLENGE TO THE HON'BLE MINISTER Shri Nitin Gadkari ji Dear Hon'ble Union Minister Shri Nitin Gadkari ji, Information from Team Bharat confirms you are in Pune this Saturday (18th July). On behalf of the Citizens of India, I am officially and respectfully requesting you to a LIVE, PUBLIC DEBATE with me on the Ethanol 20 (E20) blending policy. Let us put all facts on the table before the citizens of this great country! Here are my stakes: 1️⃣ Sir, if you defeat me in this debate, I will PUBLICLY APOLOGIZE to you on all forums. 2️⃣ I will permanently TAKE DOWN.all my anti-E20 posts. 3️⃣ I will NEVER bring up the issue of Ethanol ever again. We will also address the elephant in the room, sir. There is a massive, undeniable CONFLICT OF INTEREST with both your sons being involved in the Ethanol business. Whenever you are asked about this, you issue threats of action. In a robust democracy, citizens deserve answers not threats. Sir, Let us look at the facts: The last time you challenged us to produce even "one evidence of damage" to E10-compatible vehicles due to mandatory E20 blending, Team Bharat stepped up. We took the challenge. But instead of a debate, we were detained by the Delhi Police at the Tughlak Road Police Station. This is not how a democracy functions, Shri Nitin_gadkari ji. I urge you to accept my humble request. Let us strengthen our democratic fabric through open dialogue. If I am proven wrong, I will back down forever. The ball is in your court, Sir. I await your response. TEHSEEN POONAWALLA TEAM BHARAT To, Shri Nitin Gadkari ji.

Tehseen Poonawalla Official 🇮🇳

28,297 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

President Emmerson Mnangagwa's spokesman George Charamba, who is also the Deputy Chief Secretary, Presidential Communications in the Office of the President and Cabinet, has provoked a storm of controversy by claiming that parliament trumps a national referendum on constitutional amendment issues currently being debated through a legislative public consultation process. Mnangagwa and his party are using parliament to amend the constitution to extend his rule to 2030 and introduce a raft of other significant changes without going through a referendum, which civil society and opposition activists insist is a requirement in terms of the constitution. The 2013 constitution mandates that any extension of presidential term limits or removal of two five-year term limits must be approved by voters through a referendum. Critics say extending terms from five to seven years, or changing the electoral system constitutes a major subversion of this clause, requiring a referendum. However, Mnangagwa and his allies say a referendum is not needed as they are not removing term limits, but elongating the term lengths and changing the electoral cycle. Zanu PF says the amendment is not a change to the limit of two terms, but rather the length of each term (five to seven years), meaning a referendum is not constitutionally mandated. They say the amendments are meant to ensure political stability and remove "election mode toxicity," disrupting peace, governance and development. The debate centres over holding a referendum on the proposed amendments, specifically Constitution Amendment Bill No.3, which proposes extending Mnangagwa's tenure by two years andpresidential and parliamentary terms from five to seven years as well as changing the presidential election system from direct voting through popular franchise to indirect selection via parliament. The ruling Zanu PF party controls parliament, leading to calls for a popular referendum to approve these significant changes, which critics argue violate the 2013 constitution's democratic intent. Charamba said: “Those who were old enough to participate and follow proceedings of 2013 will know that even after the referendum, that outcome of the referendum still had to be processed through Parliament. What that means is that, a referendum does not usurp the power of Parliament. It simply provides a popular basis for legislative action. Otherwise, at law, the body which is recognized as responsible for any changes, be they at the level of the primary law or at the level of subsidiary laws, is Parliament. Right? So, really, you can't place the referendum in apposition to Parliament. You can't. You just cannot because the referendum does not give you a result that writes the constitution. It is parliament which is mandated to do so in terms of our law. So, really, there shouldn't be any argument at all in respect of that matter. Right?.”

TheNewsHawks

16,579 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten