Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

As i wrote yesterday, the Americans were trying to create FARP (Forward Arming & Refueling Point) near that mountain which happens to be 25 Kms south of Iran’s Isafahan Nuclear Facility Tunnels at 32.585522° N, 51.814933° E. In an article just last month, Rafael Grossi stated the following: “Almost... half of ‌Iran's uranium enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons-grade, was stored in a tunnel complex at Isfahan and is probably still there, U.N. nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said on Monday.” In the latest interview of 18th March 2026, IAEA Chief Rafael Grossi on Iran's new underground facility in Isfahan: “Iran itself declared a new facility. We requested access… but never made it there. Whether it’s empty or operational… we don’t know.” So this likely was being developed as FARP or Forward Operational Base for extraction of Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) from Isfahan Facility and tunnel’s nearby which is why you needed C-130s to carry 200 troops with Air Support. Trump had hoped he would do a highly risky extraction operation on 3rd-4th April 2026 & post which he could declare the victory by Easter i.e. 5th April 2026. However Iranians with manpads & Air Defence Systems foiled the plan. There are AD marks on debris of the C-130s. The Pilot rescue & CSAR mission was the cover story for a far bigger operation executed else why would you need 2 C-130s, MH6 Little Birds. We also saw images of Blackhawks being hit on Fire and TASNIM NEWS of Iran reporting loss of 12 aircraft including two C-130 transport planes, 4 Little Birds, 4 Black Hawks, & two MQ-9 drones in a single op. This big Ops is not CSAR mission but extraction of HEU mission from Isfahan Underground facility from FARP near the Mountain which is hardly 25 Kms away. The Generals who were fired in Pentagon were probably the ones who did not agree to this plan and termed it extremely risky operation. This explains Trump being out of media and probably in the situation room over the weekend.show more

Navroop Singh

71,324 subscribers

341,974 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Retrieving Iran's uranium might be the most complex nuclear removal operation in history. But the U.S. has done this before. In 1994, American teams secretly flew 600kg of weapons-grade uranium out of Kazakhstan on 2 C-5 cargo planes, refueling three times mid-air so the nuclear cargo never touched foreign soil. The planes landed at Dover Air Force Base and the material was quietly trucked to Tennessee. The whole operation took over a month. Iran is a different beast. Andrew Weber, who led that 1994 operation, puts it plainly: "You would need to set up in the middle of the country a secure perimeter. It would probably take thousands of U.S. troops to secure the facility while our experts excavated the HEU located inside deep tunnels." And that's before agreeing on where it would even go. Source: Wall Street Journal, 60 Minutes

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Retrieving Iran's uranium might be the most complex nuclear removal operation in history. But the U.S. has done this before. In 1994, American teams secretly flew 600kg of weapons-grade uranium out of Kazakhstan on 2 C-5 cargo planes, refueling three times mid-air so the nuclear cargo never touched foreign soil. The planes landed at Dover Air Force Base and the material was quietly trucked to Tennessee. The whole operation took over a month. Iran is a different beast. Andrew Weber, who led that 1994 operation, puts it plainly: "You would need to set up in the middle of the country a secure perimeter. It would probably take thousands of U.S. troops to secure the facility while our experts excavated the HEU located inside deep tunnels." And that's before agreeing on where it would even go. Source: Wall Street Journal, 60 Minutes

Mario Nawfal

120,580 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The Fordow Enrichment Facility – Iran’s nuclear facility at Fordow is located approximately 100 kilometers southwest of Tehran. It was built under a mountain near the city of Qom and is protected by anti-aircraft batteries. The facility appears to have been designed to withstand aerial attacks. According to satellite imagery, its construction began between 2002 and 2004, but Iran only reported its existence to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 2009, after Western intelligence agencies, led by the United States, exposed the facility. Fordow is a relatively small facility, capable of housing only about 3,000 centrifuges. This led analysts to believe that the site could be used to divert and rapidly enrich low-grade uranium (from 60% to 90% — the level required for nuclear weapons). Under the nuclear deal form 2015 (JCPOA), Iran agreed to halt enrichment at Fordow and convert the facility into a research center. However, after the U.S. withdrew from the agreement, Iran resumed its enrichment activities there. Recent IAEA reports indicate that Iran has increased its production of uranium enriched to 60% at the Fordow facility, which currently houses approximately 2,700 centrifuges. Reports suggest that Iran could convert its current stockpile of 60%-enriched uranium into roughly 233 kilograms of weapons-grade uranium within three weeks — enough for nine nuclear bombs. Fordow is a central focus in Israel’s efforts to disrupt and dismantle Iran’s nuclear program. However, the United States is the only country that possesses the type of bomb necessary to successfully strike the underground Fordow nuclear site from the air.

The Fordow Enrichment Facility – Iran’s nuclear facility at Fordow is located approximately 100 kilometers southwest of Tehran. It was built under a mountain near the city of Qom and is protected by anti-aircraft batteries. The facility appears to have been designed to withstand aerial attacks. According to satellite imagery, its construction began between 2002 and 2004, but Iran only reported its existence to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 2009, after Western intelligence agencies, led by the United States, exposed the facility. Fordow is a relatively small facility, capable of housing only about 3,000 centrifuges. This led analysts to believe that the site could be used to divert and rapidly enrich low-grade uranium (from 60% to 90% — the level required for nuclear weapons). Under the nuclear deal form 2015 (JCPOA), Iran agreed to halt enrichment at Fordow and convert the facility into a research center. However, after the U.S. withdrew from the agreement, Iran resumed its enrichment activities there. Recent IAEA reports indicate that Iran has increased its production of uranium enriched to 60% at the Fordow facility, which currently houses approximately 2,700 centrifuges. Reports suggest that Iran could convert its current stockpile of 60%-enriched uranium into roughly 233 kilograms of weapons-grade uranium within three weeks — enough for nine nuclear bombs. Fordow is a central focus in Israel’s efforts to disrupt and dismantle Iran’s nuclear program. However, the United States is the only country that possesses the type of bomb necessary to successfully strike the underground Fordow nuclear site from the air.

Israel-Alma

75,660 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I'm gonna say something a bit different from what that source told the New York Times. He said Fordo was damaged Severely but wasn't destroyed. So I'll tell you what Israel's current assessment is. First off all Natanz was completely wiped out. For Fordo and Isfahan, we're waiting on more confirmations. Not because we think something didn't work, but because it naturally takes longer for those deep underground sites. The big question now is whether Iran's nuke program just went back a few years, or if it's been totally erased. This relates to where the enriched uranium is. That uranium, enriched to 60%, is now incredibly hard for Iran to boost to the 90% needed for a bomb. Israel thinks most, if not all, of the enriched uranium was at Natanz or Isfahan. It wasn't moved, so it was there during the attack. We're now waiting For The BDA Of the Enriched uranium just like we were waiting on Muhammad Sinwar. I know he's under a tunnel and unreachable, but we'll likely know soon if he was also destroyed. This is huge news that could mean the official end of Iran's nuclear program.

I'm gonna say something a bit different from what that source told the New York Times. He said Fordo was damaged Severely but wasn't destroyed. So I'll tell you what Israel's current assessment is. First off all Natanz was completely wiped out. For Fordo and Isfahan, we're waiting on more confirmations. Not because we think something didn't work, but because it naturally takes longer for those deep underground sites. The big question now is whether Iran's nuke program just went back a few years, or if it's been totally erased. This relates to where the enriched uranium is. That uranium, enriched to 60%, is now incredibly hard for Iran to boost to the 90% needed for a bomb. Israel thinks most, if not all, of the enriched uranium was at Natanz or Isfahan. It wasn't moved, so it was there during the attack. We're now waiting For The BDA Of the Enriched uranium just like we were waiting on Muhammad Sinwar. I know he's under a tunnel and unreachable, but we'll likely know soon if he was also destroyed. This is huge news that could mean the official end of Iran's nuclear program.

Amit Segal

2,394,394 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 PILOT RESCUE OR NUCLEAR RAID: The TRUTH About Isfahan: The FAILED Mission the White House is Hiding.🤯 The establishment media is feeding you a script about a "heroic pilot rescue," but international reports are beginning to tell a much darker story. Was the Isfahan operation actually a botched attempt to infiltrate Iranian nuclear facilities that ended in a total American retreat? According to emerging reports from PressTV, the narrative of an F-15E pilot rescue was a cover for a high-stakes infiltration mission that fell directly into an Iranian trap. While Washington paints a picture of a calculated success, the ground reality suggests a "crushing strategic defeat." Here is the breakdown of the alleged failure: US Special Forces and a "Zionist coalition" reportedly landed C-130s at an abandoned airstrip near a nuclear site, only to find Iranian forces lying in wait. Reports claim multiple Black Hawk helicopters and specialized Little Bird aircraft were destroyed on the ground. One C-130 was allegedly targeted mid-landing, forcing a catastrophic emergency. The situation became so dire that the mission shifted from "infiltration" to a "desperate evacuation." Sources say US forces fled so quickly they abandoned equipment and officer identification before airstrikes were called in to destroy their own assets to prevent them from falling into Iranian hands. Why the sudden, frantic press conferences from the White House? Critics are arguing that the narrative of "saving a pilot" is being used to mask the loss of elite hardware and personnel. "This wasn't a rescue. It was a gambling president's failed attempt to strike a nuclear facility that ended in a disgraceful retreat." ⚠️ WHAT THIS MEANS FOR AMERICA If these reports are accurate, we aren't just looking at a tactical failure—we’re looking at a shift in the global balance of power. How did the US miscalculate Iranian air defense so badly? How many millions in taxpayer-funded tech was just turned into scrap metal in the Isfahan desert? Is the recent talk of targeting civilian infrastructure a "distraction" from this military debacle? The establishment wants you to see a victory. The evidence suggests a disaster. Is the "pilot rescue" story the truth, or are we being lied to about the start of a much larger, more dangerous conflict? Is this the "ghost in the machine" coming back to haunt the administration? Let’s discuss. Is this a media psyop or a genuine military humiliation? 👇

🚨 PILOT RESCUE OR NUCLEAR RAID: The TRUTH About Isfahan: The FAILED Mission the White House is Hiding.🤯 The establishment media is feeding you a script about a "heroic pilot rescue," but international reports are beginning to tell a much darker story. Was the Isfahan operation actually a botched attempt to infiltrate Iranian nuclear facilities that ended in a total American retreat? According to emerging reports from PressTV, the narrative of an F-15E pilot rescue was a cover for a high-stakes infiltration mission that fell directly into an Iranian trap. While Washington paints a picture of a calculated success, the ground reality suggests a "crushing strategic defeat." Here is the breakdown of the alleged failure: US Special Forces and a "Zionist coalition" reportedly landed C-130s at an abandoned airstrip near a nuclear site, only to find Iranian forces lying in wait. Reports claim multiple Black Hawk helicopters and specialized Little Bird aircraft were destroyed on the ground. One C-130 was allegedly targeted mid-landing, forcing a catastrophic emergency. The situation became so dire that the mission shifted from "infiltration" to a "desperate evacuation." Sources say US forces fled so quickly they abandoned equipment and officer identification before airstrikes were called in to destroy their own assets to prevent them from falling into Iranian hands. Why the sudden, frantic press conferences from the White House? Critics are arguing that the narrative of "saving a pilot" is being used to mask the loss of elite hardware and personnel. "This wasn't a rescue. It was a gambling president's failed attempt to strike a nuclear facility that ended in a disgraceful retreat." ⚠️ WHAT THIS MEANS FOR AMERICA If these reports are accurate, we aren't just looking at a tactical failure—we’re looking at a shift in the global balance of power. How did the US miscalculate Iranian air defense so badly? How many millions in taxpayer-funded tech was just turned into scrap metal in the Isfahan desert? Is the recent talk of targeting civilian infrastructure a "distraction" from this military debacle? The establishment wants you to see a victory. The evidence suggests a disaster. Is the "pilot rescue" story the truth, or are we being lied to about the start of a much larger, more dangerous conflict? Is this the "ghost in the machine" coming back to haunt the administration? Let’s discuss. Is this a media psyop or a genuine military humiliation? 👇

Project Constitution

62,648 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🇺🇸⚔️🇮🇷 According to geolocation data, the WSO of the downed F-15E was evacuated via a remote agricultural airstrip roughly 50 km south of Isfahan. He was initially located on Mount Siyah in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province, reportedly hiding in a crevice. U.S. recovery personnel later described landing in open terrain south of Isfahan. The straight-line distance between those points is at least 231 km—closer to 428 km by road. That implies the WSO was moved a considerable distance—potentially by helicopter—to an extraction point still roughly 400 km from the Kuwaiti border. One plausible platform for this would be an MH-6M “Little Bird” operated by the 160th SOAR. If accurate, this suggests a sustained U.S. air operation deep inside Iranian territory—potentially up to 400 km from the border—over a period of roughly 36 hours. That would include search and recovery, establishing a landing zone, relocating the pilot, and executing the final extraction, reportedly without losses. Taken at face value, this reflects poorly on Iranian response capabilities. Resistance appears to have been limited to small-arms fire from local militias and Basij units, pointing to gaps not only in air defense coverage but also in coordination and access to systems like MANPADS. ☝️That said—tinfoil hat moment— Given that the Isfahan area hosts sensitive nuclear infrastructure long associated with uranium conversion and research, it’s worth asking whether the operation had secondary objectives beyond personnel recovery—or whether the CSAR mission itself was simply an unplanned component of a broader operation. And if the official account is accurate, it sets a troubling precedent for Iran: the U.S. appears capable of conducting extended operations deep inside Iran while openly signaling interest in securing its enriched uranium.

🇺🇸⚔️🇮🇷 According to geolocation data, the WSO of the downed F-15E was evacuated via a remote agricultural airstrip roughly 50 km south of Isfahan. He was initially located on Mount Siyah in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province, reportedly hiding in a crevice. U.S. recovery personnel later described landing in open terrain south of Isfahan. The straight-line distance between those points is at least 231 km—closer to 428 km by road. That implies the WSO was moved a considerable distance—potentially by helicopter—to an extraction point still roughly 400 km from the Kuwaiti border. One plausible platform for this would be an MH-6M “Little Bird” operated by the 160th SOAR. If accurate, this suggests a sustained U.S. air operation deep inside Iranian territory—potentially up to 400 km from the border—over a period of roughly 36 hours. That would include search and recovery, establishing a landing zone, relocating the pilot, and executing the final extraction, reportedly without losses. Taken at face value, this reflects poorly on Iranian response capabilities. Resistance appears to have been limited to small-arms fire from local militias and Basij units, pointing to gaps not only in air defense coverage but also in coordination and access to systems like MANPADS. ☝️That said—tinfoil hat moment— Given that the Isfahan area hosts sensitive nuclear infrastructure long associated with uranium conversion and research, it’s worth asking whether the operation had secondary objectives beyond personnel recovery—or whether the CSAR mission itself was simply an unplanned component of a broader operation. And if the official account is accurate, it sets a troubling precedent for Iran: the U.S. appears capable of conducting extended operations deep inside Iran while openly signaling interest in securing its enriched uranium.

DD Geopolitics

160,060 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Iranian media announced that the failed Isfahan operation was not a rescue operation but a failed attempt to infiltrate Iran's nuclear facilities "In reality the American special forces walked straight into a trap set by Iran's armed forces." "The mission to infiltrate the nuclear site was changed to rescuing American commandos under fire." "US Army generals had given serious warnings to the Secretary of Defense about the heavy risks of this operation, but due to Hegseth's lack of military knowledge and Trump's insistence, the generals were dismissed just days before the Isfahan operation." "Soldiers and officers abandoned their equipment to save their lives and flee." "Trump and his illiterate Secretary of Defense, lying in Hollywood style about this failed operation, were not even believed by American audiences." "His repeated lies have eroded public trust to the lowest level, making his Goebbels-style lies hard to believe." "How can a country with supposedly no air defense or army shoot down this many fighters and aircraft, and keep adding to its collection?" - The first C-130 landed at an abandoned airstrip near Isfahan's nuclear sites - The second C-130 was hit before landing, crash-landed - Once trapped, the White House Situation Room changed the mission from nuclear infiltration to commando rescue - US troops fled so fast they left equipment and officer ID documents behind - US jets then bombed their own equipment to keep it from Iranian hands - Little Bird helicopters never even got airborne -- destroyed on the ground and inside the C-130 "This defeat could be the worst US military failure -- even worse than the failed Tabas operation of 1980."

Iranian media announced that the failed Isfahan operation was not a rescue operation but a failed attempt to infiltrate Iran's nuclear facilities "In reality the American special forces walked straight into a trap set by Iran's armed forces." "The mission to infiltrate the nuclear site was changed to rescuing American commandos under fire." "US Army generals had given serious warnings to the Secretary of Defense about the heavy risks of this operation, but due to Hegseth's lack of military knowledge and Trump's insistence, the generals were dismissed just days before the Isfahan operation." "Soldiers and officers abandoned their equipment to save their lives and flee." "Trump and his illiterate Secretary of Defense, lying in Hollywood style about this failed operation, were not even believed by American audiences." "His repeated lies have eroded public trust to the lowest level, making his Goebbels-style lies hard to believe." "How can a country with supposedly no air defense or army shoot down this many fighters and aircraft, and keep adding to its collection?" - The first C-130 landed at an abandoned airstrip near Isfahan's nuclear sites - The second C-130 was hit before landing, crash-landed - Once trapped, the White House Situation Room changed the mission from nuclear infiltration to commando rescue - US troops fled so fast they left equipment and officer ID documents behind - US jets then bombed their own equipment to keep it from Iranian hands - Little Bird helicopters never even got airborne -- destroyed on the ground and inside the C-130 "This defeat could be the worst US military failure -- even worse than the failed Tabas operation of 1980."

COMBATE |🇵🇷

41,275 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Senator Chris Murhpy on Iran's nuclear program: The president has also said over and over again that a goal of the war is to permanently deny Iran the ability to have nuclear weapons. But in our closed-door briefings, we learned that this is not actually a goal of the war plan. It is not a goal of the war to destroy Iran’s nuclear program — which is not surprising, because you cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear program from the air. You cannot destroy knowledge. You cannot hunt down with missiles every Iranian scientist who knows how to build a nuclear reactor. And much of the material is buried so far underground that it is immune to an air campaign. But then why is the president and the Department of Defense telling the American people that the point of the war is to destroy Iran’s nuclear program?

Senator Chris Murhpy on Iran's nuclear program: The president has also said over and over again that a goal of the war is to permanently deny Iran the ability to have nuclear weapons. But in our closed-door briefings, we learned that this is not actually a goal of the war plan. It is not a goal of the war to destroy Iran’s nuclear program — which is not surprising, because you cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear program from the air. You cannot destroy knowledge. You cannot hunt down with missiles every Iranian scientist who knows how to build a nuclear reactor. And much of the material is buried so far underground that it is immune to an air campaign. But then why is the president and the Department of Defense telling the American people that the point of the war is to destroy Iran’s nuclear program?

Clash Report

31,792 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Trump’s Epstein coalition caught lying bigley again! More humiliation and shame! There’s a mass grave site of American aircrafts and American terrorist invaders in Isfahan! No rescue! Just lies, billions in damage and kosher spin. Iran has released images of the first US C-130 transport losses. There are clear marks of bullet holes in the airframe. There is a skull of a deceased American invader terrorist was found among the wreckage of one of the C-130s. Left image. More evidence of Trump’s lies: An aviation reporter that covered multiple air crashes claims it’s a plane crash not as the US claims that special forces destroy the planes themselves: “The propeller blades in attached pic are bent backward exactly in a way they do when spinning at high RPM during a crash impact. That’s textbook dynamic. It is downing damage not blowing up of static aircraft” According to an informed U.S. military source, not one but four MH-6 ‘Little Bird’ helicopters were destroyed at the landing site along with the two C-130s Hercules – ABC News During the operation, two MQ-9 ‘Reaper’ drones were also shot down. In summary: IRGC statement on the failed US rescue operation which resulted in the US carrying out the Hannibal directive: "Following the desperate attempts of the American terrorist army to rescue the pilot of their downed fighter jet, a number of enemy aircraft entered Iran in the early hours of April 5th." Confirmed struck and forced into emergency landings south of Isfahan: 2 C-130 military transport planes 2 Black Hawk helicopters "After Iran's fighters completed the encirclement — the contemptible enemy, in order to prevent the disgrace of Trump and preserve the hollow prestige of their army, they were forced to heavily bomb their own downed aircraft, equipment, commanders, and soldiers." Iran is now explicitly stating the US bombed its own trapped personnel (suckers and losers as Trump calls them), to prevent capture. The Hannibal directive straight out of Israel’s playbook. "The disgrace of the trapped president and the defeated American army cannot be repaired by rhetoric, media warfare, or psychological operations." U.S. Army aircraft losses to rescue the two dead crew members of downed F-15E jet over Iran: Confirmed losses so far: — 1× F-15E Strike Eagle — destroyed — 2× HH-60 helicopters — damaged — 1x MH-6 Little Bird — destroyed — 1× A-10 Thunderbolt II — destroyed — 2× C-130 Hercules — destroyed — 1–2× MQ-9 Reapers — destroyed Possible / unconfirmed damage: — 1× F-16 Fighting Falcon — emergency squawk — 1× KC-135 Stratotanker — emergency squawk — 1× A-10 Thunderbolt II — possible emergency landing (dubious) Numerous dead American terrorists serving Israel! There’s over a $1 billion in damages and a mass grave site of dead American terrorists. Trump calls this a victory and the MIGAtards are dumb enough to believe it.

Trump’s Epstein coalition caught lying bigley again! More humiliation and shame! There’s a mass grave site of American aircrafts and American terrorist invaders in Isfahan! No rescue! Just lies, billions in damage and kosher spin. Iran has released images of the first US C-130 transport losses. There are clear marks of bullet holes in the airframe. There is a skull of a deceased American invader terrorist was found among the wreckage of one of the C-130s. Left image. More evidence of Trump’s lies: An aviation reporter that covered multiple air crashes claims it’s a plane crash not as the US claims that special forces destroy the planes themselves: “The propeller blades in attached pic are bent backward exactly in a way they do when spinning at high RPM during a crash impact. That’s textbook dynamic. It is downing damage not blowing up of static aircraft” According to an informed U.S. military source, not one but four MH-6 ‘Little Bird’ helicopters were destroyed at the landing site along with the two C-130s Hercules – ABC News During the operation, two MQ-9 ‘Reaper’ drones were also shot down. In summary: IRGC statement on the failed US rescue operation which resulted in the US carrying out the Hannibal directive: "Following the desperate attempts of the American terrorist army to rescue the pilot of their downed fighter jet, a number of enemy aircraft entered Iran in the early hours of April 5th." Confirmed struck and forced into emergency landings south of Isfahan: 2 C-130 military transport planes 2 Black Hawk helicopters "After Iran's fighters completed the encirclement — the contemptible enemy, in order to prevent the disgrace of Trump and preserve the hollow prestige of their army, they were forced to heavily bomb their own downed aircraft, equipment, commanders, and soldiers." Iran is now explicitly stating the US bombed its own trapped personnel (suckers and losers as Trump calls them), to prevent capture. The Hannibal directive straight out of Israel’s playbook. "The disgrace of the trapped president and the defeated American army cannot be repaired by rhetoric, media warfare, or psychological operations." U.S. Army aircraft losses to rescue the two dead crew members of downed F-15E jet over Iran: Confirmed losses so far: — 1× F-15E Strike Eagle — destroyed — 2× HH-60 helicopters — damaged — 1x MH-6 Little Bird — destroyed — 1× A-10 Thunderbolt II — destroyed — 2× C-130 Hercules — destroyed — 1–2× MQ-9 Reapers — destroyed Possible / unconfirmed damage: — 1× F-16 Fighting Falcon — emergency squawk — 1× KC-135 Stratotanker — emergency squawk — 1× A-10 Thunderbolt II — possible emergency landing (dubious) Numerous dead American terrorists serving Israel! There’s over a $1 billion in damages and a mass grave site of dead American terrorists. Trump calls this a victory and the MIGAtards are dumb enough to believe it.

Truth_teller 🇷🇺

316,521 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 U.S. forces just had a very messy 48 hours in Iran. An F-15E Strike Eagle was shot down. One crew member was rescued quickly, but the Weapons Systems Officer (a Colonel and Vice Wing Commander) was missing for hours. A large special operations rescue effort involving C-130s and AH-6 Little Bird helicopters was launched and things got chaotic. The odd part? F-15E aircrews are usually junior or mid-grade officers. Lieutenants. Captains. Maybe a major. So why was a colonel in the back seat of the fighter jet that went down in Iran? The rescue site was suspiciously close to Isfahan, home to Iran's heavily guarded enriched uranium stockpile. A high-ranking officer with sensitive knowledge, deep inside enemy territory, near the most valuable target in the country... Was this purely a rescue mission or did a botched F-15 shootdown accidentally blow the cover on a planned special ops raid to snatch Iran’s nuclear material? Source: zerohedge

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 U.S. forces just had a very messy 48 hours in Iran. An F-15E Strike Eagle was shot down. One crew member was rescued quickly, but the Weapons Systems Officer (a Colonel and Vice Wing Commander) was missing for hours. A large special operations rescue effort involving C-130s and AH-6 Little Bird helicopters was launched and things got chaotic. The odd part? F-15E aircrews are usually junior or mid-grade officers. Lieutenants. Captains. Maybe a major. So why was a colonel in the back seat of the fighter jet that went down in Iran? The rescue site was suspiciously close to Isfahan, home to Iran's heavily guarded enriched uranium stockpile. A high-ranking officer with sensitive knowledge, deep inside enemy territory, near the most valuable target in the country... Was this purely a rescue mission or did a botched F-15 shootdown accidentally blow the cover on a planned special ops raid to snatch Iran’s nuclear material? Source: zerohedge

Mario Nawfal

378,895 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

‼️ This is a very dangerous situation. Nothing like this has ever happened before. This nuclear power plant is the largest in Europe. Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, which has been under Russian occupation since March 2022, has been disconnected from the power supply for more than a week. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi stressed that this situation is unstable in terms of nuclear safety, since "in case of a complete blackout with no off-site power and no EDGs operating, the nuclear fuel could melt if power could not be restored in time." According to Ukraine’s state nuclear operator Energoatom, this is already the tenth blackout at the occupied Zaporizhzhia plant. At present, the plant is running on diesel generators. "Russia is doing absolutely nothing to fix the situation or to allow Ukrainian specialists to restore external power to the plant, which under normal conditions should operate without interruption. Russia is deliberately creating the threat of radiation incidents, taking advantage, unfortunately, of the weak position of the IAEA and its Director General Rafael Grossi, as well as the distraction of global attention. To resolve the situation, weak and half-measures will not work. What is needed is strong action and corresponding pressure on Russia to protect lives," President Zelenskyy said. Moreover, yesterday’s targeted Russian strike on one of Ukraine’s power substations in Slavutych caused a blackout lasting more than three hours at facilities of the former Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. "This includes, in particular, the New Safe Confinement that protects the environment from the remains of the plant’s fourth reactor after the 1986 explosion, as well as radioactive debris and dust. It also includes the spent nuclear fuel storage facility, which holds 80% of all the spent fuel accumulated during the plant’s operation - a total of more than 3,250 tons of spent fuel assemblies. The Russians could not have been unaware that a strike on facilities in Slavutych would have such consequences for Chernobyl. This was a deliberate attack, in which Russia used more than 20 drones. Some of them were shot down, but the strike was deliberately organized in a wave of drones to make defending the site more difficult," the President of Ukraine said.

‼️ This is a very dangerous situation. Nothing like this has ever happened before. This nuclear power plant is the largest in Europe. Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, which has been under Russian occupation since March 2022, has been disconnected from the power supply for more than a week. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi stressed that this situation is unstable in terms of nuclear safety, since "in case of a complete blackout with no off-site power and no EDGs operating, the nuclear fuel could melt if power could not be restored in time." According to Ukraine’s state nuclear operator Energoatom, this is already the tenth blackout at the occupied Zaporizhzhia plant. At present, the plant is running on diesel generators. "Russia is doing absolutely nothing to fix the situation or to allow Ukrainian specialists to restore external power to the plant, which under normal conditions should operate without interruption. Russia is deliberately creating the threat of radiation incidents, taking advantage, unfortunately, of the weak position of the IAEA and its Director General Rafael Grossi, as well as the distraction of global attention. To resolve the situation, weak and half-measures will not work. What is needed is strong action and corresponding pressure on Russia to protect lives," President Zelenskyy said. Moreover, yesterday’s targeted Russian strike on one of Ukraine’s power substations in Slavutych caused a blackout lasting more than three hours at facilities of the former Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. "This includes, in particular, the New Safe Confinement that protects the environment from the remains of the plant’s fourth reactor after the 1986 explosion, as well as radioactive debris and dust. It also includes the spent nuclear fuel storage facility, which holds 80% of all the spent fuel accumulated during the plant’s operation - a total of more than 3,250 tons of spent fuel assemblies. The Russians could not have been unaware that a strike on facilities in Slavutych would have such consequences for Chernobyl. This was a deliberate attack, in which Russia used more than 20 drones. Some of them were shot down, but the strike was deliberately organized in a wave of drones to make defending the site more difficult," the President of Ukraine said.

Anton Gerashchenko

256,752 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The most dangerous mission of this entire war hasn't happened yet... CBS News reports the Trump administration is actively planning to send Joint Special Operations Command, America's most elite military unit, into Iran to physically seize 972 pounds of enriched uranium buried under bombed-out nuclear sites. The IAEA chief described the challenge on live television: highly contaminated uranium hexafluoride gas stored in cylinders beneath rubble, at 60% enrichment, a short step from weapons-grade material. "Very challenging" is diplomatic language for one of the most complex military operations ever attempted. This isn't raiding a compound in Abbottabad. It's sending commandos into a country they've been bombing for three weeks to extract radioactive material from underground facilities that were hit with bunker busters last summer and buried under concrete. Trump says the war is "winding down." Behind the scenes, his team is planning an operation that would deploy JSOC into Iran and open a new chapter of escalation. Source: CBS News / CENTCOM

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The most dangerous mission of this entire war hasn't happened yet... CBS News reports the Trump administration is actively planning to send Joint Special Operations Command, America's most elite military unit, into Iran to physically seize 972 pounds of enriched uranium buried under bombed-out nuclear sites. The IAEA chief described the challenge on live television: highly contaminated uranium hexafluoride gas stored in cylinders beneath rubble, at 60% enrichment, a short step from weapons-grade material. "Very challenging" is diplomatic language for one of the most complex military operations ever attempted. This isn't raiding a compound in Abbottabad. It's sending commandos into a country they've been bombing for three weeks to extract radioactive material from underground facilities that were hit with bunker busters last summer and buried under concrete. Trump says the war is "winding down." Behind the scenes, his team is planning an operation that would deploy JSOC into Iran and open a new chapter of escalation. Source: CBS News / CENTCOM

Mario Nawfal

200,562 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

President Trump has always had two objectives in this war with Iran: 1) Stop Iran from having a nuclear weapon. 2) Control the Strait of Hormuz (which until now was controlled by Iran and Oman). Trump wants to control these different choke points around the world. It's important to keep in mind these two goals when analyzing the final terms of this deal, because we have to remember that Trump's goals were always different than the forever war neocon goals. There are neocons in our country and in the Middle East who want this war to drag on for decades because they profit off of it. They want a John Bolton-style complete annihilation of Iran. That was never President Trump. I want you to analyze this military operation based on whether or not Trump achieved the goals that he set out to achieve. Even the freedom of the Iranian people was never the primary goal. That's not why he staged this military operation. So when we do get the details of this MOU with Iran, remember what President Trump's two objectives were. My guess is that you will see both of those goals have been accomplished.

President Trump has always had two objectives in this war with Iran: 1) Stop Iran from having a nuclear weapon. 2) Control the Strait of Hormuz (which until now was controlled by Iran and Oman). Trump wants to control these different choke points around the world. It's important to keep in mind these two goals when analyzing the final terms of this deal, because we have to remember that Trump's goals were always different than the forever war neocon goals. There are neocons in our country and in the Middle East who want this war to drag on for decades because they profit off of it. They want a John Bolton-style complete annihilation of Iran. That was never President Trump. I want you to analyze this military operation based on whether or not Trump achieved the goals that he set out to achieve. Even the freedom of the Iranian people was never the primary goal. That's not why he staged this military operation. So when we do get the details of this MOU with Iran, remember what President Trump's two objectives were. My guess is that you will see both of those goals have been accomplished.

Liz Wheeler

35,889 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

First of all, an attack on Saturday morning is nothing new to us. This time we are on the right side. We must ask the question that many Israelis are asking themselves, especially those who are now turning on their televisions and saying, “Wait a minute, but we were told that Operation Rising Lion ended with the defeat of the Iranian nuclear project.” Donald Trump said it was completely destroyed. So how can Trump and Netanyahu say today that the goal is to destroy the Iranian nuclear project? Two things need to be explained. The first is that while the U.S. said the Iranian nuclear project was completely destroyed, Israel did not use that rhetoric. It said that we had set them back years, which was indeed true. So why now? Well, three dramatic things happened here. One, in my opinion, the relatively minor one, is that the Iranians tried to move their weapons systems, including their nuclear infrastructure underground. They have now distanced themselves from nuclear and are focusing on the missile system with which it was supposed to reach Israel. They were trying to take the entire system underground, and not just underground, but to a place that even American bombs cannot reach. And that is the point of no return. The second thing, of course, is the ballistic missile system posed a threat. The third was the opportunity created by Operation Rising Lion. And that opportunity is the uprising in Iran, which, had it not been for the massacre of 30,000 Iranians, would probably have led to the fall of the regime. Israel and the U.S. together decided—by the way, they decided weeks ago. As usual, there was a whole system of tension, and Trump was hesitating, but basically the decision was made a few weeks ago. They decided to give that extra push, and it’s quite a push. I just want to explain for the sake of proportion. Operation Rising Lion had 1,000 strikes; the U.S. war in Iraq in 2003 had 116,000. So when you add that huge elephant (the U.S.), that huge mammoth, the consequences are dramatic. Not for nothing, Netanyahu said today, Operation Rising Lion will pale in comparison to what is happening. Yes, they said. Anyone who listens to the eight minutes and 20 seconds in which Trump speaks in an angry and serious tone—really, the operation—it doesn’t seem to me something electoral in the U.S. And the anger is enormous. It really seems to me as if Trump chose it. Netanyahu understands that Trump’s goal is to bring down this regime, and he says things there that are accurate and, in my opinion, historic. He says for 47 years, this regime and its people have been shouting “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.” They finance terrorism, they launch terrorism, they are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of Americans and thousands of Israelis, including on Oct. 7. What began on Saturday morning Oct. 7 may now end with this operation that began on Saturday morning.

First of all, an attack on Saturday morning is nothing new to us. This time we are on the right side. We must ask the question that many Israelis are asking themselves, especially those who are now turning on their televisions and saying, “Wait a minute, but we were told that Operation Rising Lion ended with the defeat of the Iranian nuclear project.” Donald Trump said it was completely destroyed. So how can Trump and Netanyahu say today that the goal is to destroy the Iranian nuclear project? Two things need to be explained. The first is that while the U.S. said the Iranian nuclear project was completely destroyed, Israel did not use that rhetoric. It said that we had set them back years, which was indeed true. So why now? Well, three dramatic things happened here. One, in my opinion, the relatively minor one, is that the Iranians tried to move their weapons systems, including their nuclear infrastructure underground. They have now distanced themselves from nuclear and are focusing on the missile system with which it was supposed to reach Israel. They were trying to take the entire system underground, and not just underground, but to a place that even American bombs cannot reach. And that is the point of no return. The second thing, of course, is the ballistic missile system posed a threat. The third was the opportunity created by Operation Rising Lion. And that opportunity is the uprising in Iran, which, had it not been for the massacre of 30,000 Iranians, would probably have led to the fall of the regime. Israel and the U.S. together decided—by the way, they decided weeks ago. As usual, there was a whole system of tension, and Trump was hesitating, but basically the decision was made a few weeks ago. They decided to give that extra push, and it’s quite a push. I just want to explain for the sake of proportion. Operation Rising Lion had 1,000 strikes; the U.S. war in Iraq in 2003 had 116,000. So when you add that huge elephant (the U.S.), that huge mammoth, the consequences are dramatic. Not for nothing, Netanyahu said today, Operation Rising Lion will pale in comparison to what is happening. Yes, they said. Anyone who listens to the eight minutes and 20 seconds in which Trump speaks in an angry and serious tone—really, the operation—it doesn’t seem to me something electoral in the U.S. And the anger is enormous. It really seems to me as if Trump chose it. Netanyahu understands that Trump’s goal is to bring down this regime, and he says things there that are accurate and, in my opinion, historic. He says for 47 years, this regime and its people have been shouting “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.” They finance terrorism, they launch terrorism, they are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of Americans and thousands of Israelis, including on Oct. 7. What began on Saturday morning Oct. 7 may now end with this operation that began on Saturday morning.

Amit Segal

98,731 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🇮🇷🇮🇱| In an interview on the Israeli I24news network: “The Iranian Fordow nuclear facility can only be destroyed from the inside. Let’s stop with illusions and fantasies—it can only be done from within, or with 100’s of bombs dropped one after another. What’s troubling is this: We set a goal to dismantle Iran’s nuclear program—but we failed to do it. Iran still has enriched uranium, and it still has key (untouched) active facilities. And I say this with great caution: The Iranians have not said their final word. Those who don’t understand the Shiites, the Arab world, or the Iranians don’t realize that as the Bedouins say: Revenge is served cold. This was a mistake. Trump truly made a huge blunder. I hope we won’t be the ones to pay the price for Trump’s blunder.”

🇮🇷🇮🇱| In an interview on the Israeli I24news network: “The Iranian Fordow nuclear facility can only be destroyed from the inside. Let’s stop with illusions and fantasies—it can only be done from within, or with 100’s of bombs dropped one after another. What’s troubling is this: We set a goal to dismantle Iran’s nuclear program—but we failed to do it. Iran still has enriched uranium, and it still has key (untouched) active facilities. And I say this with great caution: The Iranians have not said their final word. Those who don’t understand the Shiites, the Arab world, or the Iranians don’t realize that as the Bedouins say: Revenge is served cold. This was a mistake. Trump truly made a huge blunder. I hope we won’t be the ones to pay the price for Trump’s blunder.”

Arya Yadeghaar

568,640 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"I will testify under oath before Congress that what I'm saying is the truth." "And he said, 'By the way, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' He pulled out one of these mosaics and showed this base, which had geometric shapes, there were towers, there were spherical buildings, there were very tall towers." ~KW (The photographic evidence I've seen thus far leaves a lot to be desired, so if more images are going to be released (as Lue Elizondo spoke about), let's hope they're clear, and conclusively show artificial structures. Ever since I first heard Wolfe tell his story (2001 at Greer's event), I felt he came across as highly credible. Unfortunately, he was killed in 2018 when he was hit by a tractor trailer as he was biking. So what did he see? Structures built by a non-human intelligence? Or, built by a previous, highly-advanced civilization on Earth? Or, from a current, human, "breakaway civilization"?) ~ Former U.S. Air Force Sergeant Karl Wolfe: "My boss came to me, I was working in a color lab at that time, I was a technician, photographic technician. I was asked to go over to this facility on Langley Air Force Base, where the NSA was bringing in the information from the lunar orbiter. And so I packed up some tools, I went over, I went into the facility. "A couple of officers took me into this hangar. This was a very large hangar. So they took me into this laboratory. I took a look at the equipment. There was an airman second class in there, I was an airman second class as well. He turned the equipment on and put it through its paces. It didn't do what it was supposed to do. I saw what was going on with it, and I said to him, 'You know, we'll have to take this thing out of the lab if we're going to work on it. We can't work on it in here in the dark-room environment.' "So, everyone left the facility, left the dark room, except this airman second class and myself. And were in, waiting for someone to come to remove this piece of equipment. And at the time, I didn't know what the real purpose of this dark room and this operation and this (laughs) facility was. I thought this was where they were bringing the data in and then releasing the images to the public. "They were doing 35 millimeter strips of film at that time, which were then assembled into 18 and a half by 11 inch mosaics, they were called. There is a digital signature and a gray scale on every 35 millimeter strip. And those strips were from successive passes around the moon. "So he was showing me how all this worked, and we walked over to one side of the lab, and he said, 'By the way, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' And I said, 'Whose (laughs)? What do you mean, whose?' He said, 'Yes, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' "And at that point, I become frightened, and was a little terrified. Thinking to myself that, if anybody walks in the room now, I know we're in jeopardy, we're in trouble, because he shouldn't be giving me this information. "And that he pulled out one of these mosaics and showed this base, which had geometric shapes, there were towers, there were spherical buildings, there were very tall towers, and things that looked somewhat like radar dishes but they were large structures. If I compare it to what I'm seeing now, because I do have photographs that have our artifacts in them that are similar to what I saw, they're massive. Some of the structures are, you know, half a mile in size. So they're huge structures. "Some of the buildings seemed to have very reflective surfaces on them. A couple of structures that I saw reminded me of cooling towers at power-generating plants, they had that sort of a shape. Some of them were just very, very straight and tall with a flat top. Some of them were round, some of them looked like a Quonset hut, you know, with a domed kind of, like a greenhouse. "The particular shot that I saw, there were several clustered together over a landscape, a fairly large landscape. I didn't want to look at it any longer than that because I felt that my life was in jeopardy. Do you understand what I'm saying (laughs)? I would love to have looked at it longer (laughs), I would have loved to have had copies. I would love to have, you know, said more about it or discussed it more, but I knew I couldn't. And I knew that that young fellow who was sharing this was really, really overstepping his bounds at that point."

"I will testify under oath before Congress that what I'm saying is the truth." "And he said, 'By the way, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' He pulled out one of these mosaics and showed this base, which had geometric shapes, there were towers, there were spherical buildings, there were very tall towers." ~KW (The photographic evidence I've seen thus far leaves a lot to be desired, so if more images are going to be released (as Lue Elizondo spoke about), let's hope they're clear, and conclusively show artificial structures. Ever since I first heard Wolfe tell his story (2001 at Greer's event), I felt he came across as highly credible. Unfortunately, he was killed in 2018 when he was hit by a tractor trailer as he was biking. So what did he see? Structures built by a non-human intelligence? Or, built by a previous, highly-advanced civilization on Earth? Or, from a current, human, "breakaway civilization"?) ~ Former U.S. Air Force Sergeant Karl Wolfe: "My boss came to me, I was working in a color lab at that time, I was a technician, photographic technician. I was asked to go over to this facility on Langley Air Force Base, where the NSA was bringing in the information from the lunar orbiter. And so I packed up some tools, I went over, I went into the facility. "A couple of officers took me into this hangar. This was a very large hangar. So they took me into this laboratory. I took a look at the equipment. There was an airman second class in there, I was an airman second class as well. He turned the equipment on and put it through its paces. It didn't do what it was supposed to do. I saw what was going on with it, and I said to him, 'You know, we'll have to take this thing out of the lab if we're going to work on it. We can't work on it in here in the dark-room environment.' "So, everyone left the facility, left the dark room, except this airman second class and myself. And were in, waiting for someone to come to remove this piece of equipment. And at the time, I didn't know what the real purpose of this dark room and this operation and this (laughs) facility was. I thought this was where they were bringing the data in and then releasing the images to the public. "They were doing 35 millimeter strips of film at that time, which were then assembled into 18 and a half by 11 inch mosaics, they were called. There is a digital signature and a gray scale on every 35 millimeter strip. And those strips were from successive passes around the moon. "So he was showing me how all this worked, and we walked over to one side of the lab, and he said, 'By the way, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' And I said, 'Whose (laughs)? What do you mean, whose?' He said, 'Yes, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' "And at that point, I become frightened, and was a little terrified. Thinking to myself that, if anybody walks in the room now, I know we're in jeopardy, we're in trouble, because he shouldn't be giving me this information. "And that he pulled out one of these mosaics and showed this base, which had geometric shapes, there were towers, there were spherical buildings, there were very tall towers, and things that looked somewhat like radar dishes but they were large structures. If I compare it to what I'm seeing now, because I do have photographs that have our artifacts in them that are similar to what I saw, they're massive. Some of the structures are, you know, half a mile in size. So they're huge structures. "Some of the buildings seemed to have very reflective surfaces on them. A couple of structures that I saw reminded me of cooling towers at power-generating plants, they had that sort of a shape. Some of them were just very, very straight and tall with a flat top. Some of them were round, some of them looked like a Quonset hut, you know, with a domed kind of, like a greenhouse. "The particular shot that I saw, there were several clustered together over a landscape, a fairly large landscape. I didn't want to look at it any longer than that because I felt that my life was in jeopardy. Do you understand what I'm saying (laughs)? I would love to have looked at it longer (laughs), I would have loved to have had copies. I would love to have, you know, said more about it or discussed it more, but I knew I couldn't. And I knew that that young fellow who was sharing this was really, really overstepping his bounds at that point."

Joe Murgia

118,679 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Professor Robert Pape: Now Iran is more powerful, not weaker. It’s going to want more. It will want to keep the 3.5 percent enriched uranium. I’ve modeled the bombing of Iran for 20 years. The United States would bomb Fordo and Natanz because Israel does not have the airpower to take out Fordo. So we take out Fordo. When we do, we disable the industrial facility — but we don’t get the nuclear material. Even though President Trump declared the program obliterated, he began negotiating again. Why? Because of the nuclear material. My analysis has always been that about a year later, you would panic over that dispersed material. You would never truly know whether it was being turned into a nuclear weapon or a radiological device. And then you would move toward regime change. Bombing for regime change was always stage two. I said this is how America would talk itself into a regime change war — something it has resisted for decades. First, you bomb Fordo. That’s exactly what happened. You disable the facility , not the enriched uranium. And it’s always about the enriched uranium.

Professor Robert Pape: Now Iran is more powerful, not weaker. It’s going to want more. It will want to keep the 3.5 percent enriched uranium. I’ve modeled the bombing of Iran for 20 years. The United States would bomb Fordo and Natanz because Israel does not have the airpower to take out Fordo. So we take out Fordo. When we do, we disable the industrial facility — but we don’t get the nuclear material. Even though President Trump declared the program obliterated, he began negotiating again. Why? Because of the nuclear material. My analysis has always been that about a year later, you would panic over that dispersed material. You would never truly know whether it was being turned into a nuclear weapon or a radiological device. And then you would move toward regime change. Bombing for regime change was always stage two. I said this is how America would talk itself into a regime change war — something it has resisted for decades. First, you bomb Fordo. That’s exactly what happened. You disable the facility , not the enriched uranium. And it’s always about the enriched uranium.

Clash Report

53,986 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 Satellite images of Iran's missile bases, which continue to be subjected to airstrikes - Missile base south of Isfahan. A photo dated March 3 shows traces of strikes around two tunnel entrances. It's unclear whether they collapsed as a result of the strikes. - Missile base in Qazvin. The photo shows destroyed buildings on the surface and two destroyed vehicles. - Missile base north of Kermanshah. All buildings on the surface were destroyed, and the tunnel entrances were damaged. Traces of strikes are also visible on the road, but it's unclear what was the target. - Missile base south of Tabriz. Recently built radar domes and auxiliary buildings were destroyed, and the tunnel entrances were damaged. Numerous craters are also visible along the roads. - Missile base in Dezful. Buildings on the surface were destroyed as a result of strikes. - Missile base in Bid Kaneh. The tunnel entrances were subjected to strikes with anti-bunker munitions. The checkpoint and auxiliary buildings were destroyed. Scattered craters indicate strikes on launchers. - An updated photo of the missile base north of Isfahan. The destruction of launchers, likely leaving the underground part of the base, continues. The photo shows traces of fuel spills from at least two destroyed launchers. - An updated photo of the missile base in Khorramabad, which was subjected to repeated strikes. This time, it seems that the tunnel entrances were the target. It's unclear whether anti-bunker munitions were used, but after the repeated strikes, the entrances suffered serious damage. Traces of a strike on one launcher were also found. - Missile base in Yazd. The targets of the strikes were the tunnel entrances. Auxiliary buildings were destroyed. Craters along the road indicate attempts to strike the launchers, but it's hard to say whether they were successful. - Missile base in Lorestan. Traces of strikes on the tunnels are visible, and most of the auxiliary buildings were destroyed or suffered significant damage. Traces of strikes are visible on the roads - likely in an attempt to hit the launchers.

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 Satellite images of Iran's missile bases, which continue to be subjected to airstrikes - Missile base south of Isfahan. A photo dated March 3 shows traces of strikes around two tunnel entrances. It's unclear whether they collapsed as a result of the strikes. - Missile base in Qazvin. The photo shows destroyed buildings on the surface and two destroyed vehicles. - Missile base north of Kermanshah. All buildings on the surface were destroyed, and the tunnel entrances were damaged. Traces of strikes are also visible on the road, but it's unclear what was the target. - Missile base south of Tabriz. Recently built radar domes and auxiliary buildings were destroyed, and the tunnel entrances were damaged. Numerous craters are also visible along the roads. - Missile base in Dezful. Buildings on the surface were destroyed as a result of strikes. - Missile base in Bid Kaneh. The tunnel entrances were subjected to strikes with anti-bunker munitions. The checkpoint and auxiliary buildings were destroyed. Scattered craters indicate strikes on launchers. - An updated photo of the missile base north of Isfahan. The destruction of launchers, likely leaving the underground part of the base, continues. The photo shows traces of fuel spills from at least two destroyed launchers. - An updated photo of the missile base in Khorramabad, which was subjected to repeated strikes. This time, it seems that the tunnel entrances were the target. It's unclear whether anti-bunker munitions were used, but after the repeated strikes, the entrances suffered serious damage. Traces of a strike on one launcher were also found. - Missile base in Yazd. The targets of the strikes were the tunnel entrances. Auxiliary buildings were destroyed. Craters along the road indicate attempts to strike the launchers, but it's hard to say whether they were successful. - Missile base in Lorestan. Traces of strikes on the tunnels are visible, and most of the auxiliary buildings were destroyed or suffered significant damage. Traces of strikes are visible on the roads - likely in an attempt to hit the launchers.

Lord Bebo

75,808 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Former Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Olmert: ‘With the US-Iran agreement, we are back to SQUARE ONE.’ ‘What I can say about Netanyahu is that the greatest failure in influencing Trump started much earlier. Not in 2026 when he possibly convinced Trump to jointly attack Iran, but when he convinced Trump in 2018 to withdraw from the then-signed agreement between President Obama and the Iranians about the nuclear program of Iran. Because what happened is that until then, Iran didn’t enrich uranium since they signed the agreement with Obama. And when America withdrew from that agreement, they started rapidly to enrich uranium up to the level of 60%, which brought them quite close to the possibility of building an atomic bomb. And that has, in a way, created the almost inevitable circumstances to launch this military attack on February of 26th. And the bottom line after this four month process is that we came back to where it started. There is an agreement between America and Iran, after a long period of closing the Strait of Hormuz, which caused serious economic damage to the international community. And we are with an agreement perhaps weaker than the one that was signed by President Obama. I don’t remember that President Obama promised to build up a fund of $300 billion to compensate Iran for the losses of the war, and I don’t know what is the difference in terms of inspecting and supervising the nuclear program other than what was until then. The Obama agreement was also based on the supervision and inspection of the nuclear program by the IAEA, the International Atomic Agency in Vienna. And that’s more or less what they agreed. Now, there is nothing about the ballistic missiles. There is nothing about, of course, the change of regime in Iran. So, actually we are back into square one.’ —Former Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Olmert joins us for Saturday’s episode of Going Underground Don’t miss it, follow our Rumble channel👇

Former Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Olmert: ‘With the US-Iran agreement, we are back to SQUARE ONE.’ ‘What I can say about Netanyahu is that the greatest failure in influencing Trump started much earlier. Not in 2026 when he possibly convinced Trump to jointly attack Iran, but when he convinced Trump in 2018 to withdraw from the then-signed agreement between President Obama and the Iranians about the nuclear program of Iran. Because what happened is that until then, Iran didn’t enrich uranium since they signed the agreement with Obama. And when America withdrew from that agreement, they started rapidly to enrich uranium up to the level of 60%, which brought them quite close to the possibility of building an atomic bomb. And that has, in a way, created the almost inevitable circumstances to launch this military attack on February of 26th. And the bottom line after this four month process is that we came back to where it started. There is an agreement between America and Iran, after a long period of closing the Strait of Hormuz, which caused serious economic damage to the international community. And we are with an agreement perhaps weaker than the one that was signed by President Obama. I don’t remember that President Obama promised to build up a fund of $300 billion to compensate Iran for the losses of the war, and I don’t know what is the difference in terms of inspecting and supervising the nuclear program other than what was until then. The Obama agreement was also based on the supervision and inspection of the nuclear program by the IAEA, the International Atomic Agency in Vienna. And that’s more or less what they agreed. Now, there is nothing about the ballistic missiles. There is nothing about, of course, the change of regime in Iran. So, actually we are back into square one.’ —Former Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Olmert joins us for Saturday’s episode of Going Underground Don’t miss it, follow our Rumble channel👇

Going Underground

39,275 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten