Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

As someone who ships LLM systems in production, this backpropagation video is the closest thing to a "why GPT actually learns" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks training a neural network is calculus. It's not. It's 175 billion weights getting nudged proportionally to how much each... show more

Eron

1,547 subscribers

20,078 просмотров • 23 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

As someone who ships LLM systems in production, this Laplace transform video is the closest thing to a "why Mamba beats transformers" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks attention is what makes LLMs powerful. Laplace proved in 1785 that any signal breaks into exponential pieces - locate the poles, expose the frequencies. Mamba and Claude run on this exact trick. 34 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. The math is older than the United States.

As someone who ships LLM systems in production, this Laplace transform video is the closest thing to a "why Mamba beats transformers" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks attention is what makes LLMs powerful. Laplace proved in 1785 that any signal breaks into exponential pieces - locate the poles, expose the frequencies. Mamba and Claude run on this exact trick. 34 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. The math is older than the United States.

Eron

66,640 просмотров • 24 дней назад

As someone who ships LLM systems in production, this hairy ball theorem video is the closest thing to a "why positional encoding in 3D robotics always breaks" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks orientation in 3D space is a solved problem. A theorem from 1912 proves there is always at least one direction where any continuous vector field hits zero — the exact reason every robotics LLM glitches at certain angles. 25 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. The math is older than the airplane.

As someone who ships LLM systems in production, this hairy ball theorem video is the closest thing to a "why positional encoding in 3D robotics always breaks" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks orientation in 3D space is a solved problem. A theorem from 1912 proves there is always at least one direction where any continuous vector field hits zero — the exact reason every robotics LLM glitches at certain angles. 25 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. The math is older than the airplane.

Eron

56,886 просмотров • 22 дней назад

As someone who ships LLM systems in production, this double pendulum video is the closest thing to a "why one changed word breaks Claude and GPT-5" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks LLMs are deterministic machines. They're not. Every prompt to GPT-5 is a chaotic double pendulum - a tiny perturbation in the initial state (one comma, one whitespace) sends the entire response into a completely different attractor. Bookmark this 26-min video and watch tonight. Same butterfly-effect chaos that broke Poincaré's math, now the exact reason your API calls to Claude feel unreliable.

As someone who ships LLM systems in production, this double pendulum video is the closest thing to a "why one changed word breaks Claude and GPT-5" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks LLMs are deterministic machines. They're not. Every prompt to GPT-5 is a chaotic double pendulum - a tiny perturbation in the initial state (one comma, one whitespace) sends the entire response into a completely different attractor. Bookmark this 26-min video and watch tonight. Same butterfly-effect chaos that broke Poincaré's math, now the exact reason your API calls to Claude feel unreliable.

fintex

50,158 просмотров • 2 дней назад

As someone who's built with modern LLM architectures, this Laplace transform lecture is the closest thing to a "why Mamba works" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks transformers are the only path to modern LLMs. State space models like Mamba and S4 challenge that using math Laplace built in the 1780s. This video shows why. 25 minutes. Bookmark & watch today.

As someone who's built with modern LLM architectures, this Laplace transform lecture is the closest thing to a "why Mamba works" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks transformers are the only path to modern LLMs. State space models like Mamba and S4 challenge that using math Laplace built in the 1780s. This video shows why. 25 minutes. Bookmark & watch today.

fintex

110,151 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

As someone who trains LLMs, this 20-minute gradient descent video is the closest thing to a "why the memorization vs generalization debate matters" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks neural nets learn features. They often just memorize. The video walks through the 2017 paper that shocked the field: shuffle your labels randomly and modern networks will still fit them perfectly. 25 minutes. Bookmark & watch today.

As someone who trains LLMs, this 20-minute gradient descent video is the closest thing to a "why the memorization vs generalization debate matters" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks neural nets learn features. They often just memorize. The video walks through the 2017 paper that shocked the field: shuffle your labels randomly and modern networks will still fit them perfectly. 25 minutes. Bookmark & watch today.

fintex

15,922 просмотров • 29 дней назад

As someone who builds with LLMs and diffusion models, this 14-minute heat equation video is the closest thing to a "why noise reversal actually works" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks diffusion is a novel AI concept. It's the heat equation from 1822. The forward process spreads noise like heat, and the reverse process is what your model learns. Bookmark & watch this weekend. Same math, from 19th-century physics to 2025 image generation.

As someone who builds with LLMs and diffusion models, this 14-minute heat equation video is the closest thing to a "why noise reversal actually works" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks diffusion is a novel AI concept. It's the heat equation from 1822. The forward process spreads noise like heat, and the reverse process is what your model learns. Bookmark & watch this weekend. Same math, from 19th-century physics to 2025 image generation.

fintex

15,604 просмотров • 22 дней назад

As someone who ships LLM systems in production, this sliding puzzle video is the closest thing to a "why sampling harder never finds the answer" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks a hard problem means a huge search space. It doesn't. Klotski has just 25,955 states, yet random search dies in the same pit every time. That's the exact reason OpenAI and Anthropic pay for guided search instead of more samples. Bookmark & watch this weekend. Same graph traversal, from a wooden toy on a coffee table to every reasoning model burning test-time compute today.

As someone who ships LLM systems in production, this sliding puzzle video is the closest thing to a "why sampling harder never finds the answer" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks a hard problem means a huge search space. It doesn't. Klotski has just 25,955 states, yet random search dies in the same pit every time. That's the exact reason OpenAI and Anthropic pay for guided search instead of more samples. Bookmark & watch this weekend. Same graph traversal, from a wooden toy on a coffee table to every reasoning model burning test-time compute today.

fintex

56,161 просмотров • 6 дней назад

As someone who trains and fine-tunes LLMs, this double descent video is the closest thing to a "why every ML textbook was wrong about GPT-5" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks bigger models overfit worse. They don't. Past a certain scale the test error dives again - the exact reason OpenAI and Anthropic keep scaling up instead of down. Bookmark & watch this weekend. The 2019 discovery that quietly forced Stanford professors to rewrite their textbooks and reshaped how every frontier LLM gets trained.

As someone who trains and fine-tunes LLMs, this double descent video is the closest thing to a "why every ML textbook was wrong about GPT-5" explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks bigger models overfit worse. They don't. Past a certain scale the test error dives again - the exact reason OpenAI and Anthropic keep scaling up instead of down. Bookmark & watch this weekend. The 2019 discovery that quietly forced Stanford professors to rewrite their textbooks and reshaped how every frontier LLM gets trained.

fintex

68,364 просмотров • 10 дней назад

As someone who's spent 3 years fine-tuning ML models, this lecture on neural networks from a Stanford math grad is the closest thing to a no-bullshit "day one of ML" briefing I've ever seen released publicly for free. Everyone thinks neural nets are magic. They aren't. They're 13,000 dials - a matrix multiplication, a sigmoid squish, done. Once you see the math, "AI" stops feeling mysterious. 18 minutes. Bookmark & watch today.

As someone who's spent 3 years fine-tuning ML models, this lecture on neural networks from a Stanford math grad is the closest thing to a no-bullshit "day one of ML" briefing I've ever seen released publicly for free. Everyone thinks neural nets are magic. They aren't. They're 13,000 dials - a matrix multiplication, a sigmoid squish, done. Once you see the math, "AI" stops feeling mysterious. 18 minutes. Bookmark & watch today.

fintex

332,082 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

As someone who's been shipping LLMs since the GPT-2 days, this lecture on cross-entropy from a Stanford math grad is the closest thing to an ML PhD qualifying exam I've ever seen released publicly for free. Everyone thinks language models predict the next word. They don't. They compress language. Once you see the math, you can't unsee it. 33 minutes. Bookmark & watch today.

As someone who's been shipping LLMs since the GPT-2 days, this lecture on cross-entropy from a Stanford math grad is the closest thing to an ML PhD qualifying exam I've ever seen released publicly for free. Everyone thinks language models predict the next word. They don't. They compress language. Once you see the math, you can't unsee it. 33 minutes. Bookmark & watch today.

fintex

354,056 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

As someone who reads every transformer paper that drops, this Fourier series lecture is the closest thing to a Google FNet explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks attention is what makes transformers powerful. Google replaced attention with a 200-year-old Fourier transform. It nearly matched BERT and ran 7x faster. 25 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. Then read the article below - I broke down the 5 pieces of math the AI hype skips.

As someone who reads every transformer paper that drops, this Fourier series lecture is the closest thing to a Google FNet explainer I've ever seen released for free. Everyone thinks attention is what makes transformers powerful. Google replaced attention with a 200-year-old Fourier transform. It nearly matched BERT and ran 7x faster. 25 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. Then read the article below - I broke down the 5 pieces of math the AI hype skips.

fintex

100,785 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

As someone who builds institutional quant systems, this is the only time I've seen a $2.2 trillion fund publicly show exactly how they use AI internally to win. Bookmark & watch this today. It's the most valuable 1 hour in quant AI right now.

As someone who builds institutional quant systems, this is the only time I've seen a $2.2 trillion fund publicly show exactly how they use AI internally to win. Bookmark & watch this today. It's the most valuable 1 hour in quant AI right now.

Roan

28,053 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI: "GPT 5.6 is 54% more efficient on agentic coding, and it's still the best on the market for half the cost." AI spend has never mattered as much as it does today. As a result the models keep getting better and cheaper at the same time. This is going to widen the gap between the people using AI agents and everyone else, because now it's not just powerful, it's cheap. That's exactly why i wrote a full step by step guide on agents, what they are and how to build your own from scratch. Read it below.

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI: "GPT 5.6 is 54% more efficient on agentic coding, and it's still the best on the market for half the cost." AI spend has never mattered as much as it does today. As a result the models keep getting better and cheaper at the same time. This is going to widen the gap between the people using AI agents and everyone else, because now it's not just powerful, it's cheap. That's exactly why i wrote a full step by step guide on agents, what they are and how to build your own from scratch. Read it below.

Anatoli Kopadze

91,518 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Ever wondered what neural networks are and how they work? Systems like ChatGPT use neural networks to work as well as they do. Neural networks are composed of "layers" of neurons, layers with different functions; connections between layers called "weights"; and mathematical functions called "activation functions". If you’re interested in learning about these systems, check the comments. Ultimately, the neural network structure of the model serves to visually demonstrate that it is, in fact, a complex mathematical equation. When companies release the model's weights, they are releasing a key component needed to run the model's complete equation. Without the weights, the equation is incomplete. For the math-minded: the weights of a model are the learned numbers (they are variables during training) that are then used as constants in the mathematical functions that make up the model. Neural networks are ultimately just one big, hyper-complex mathematical function, and when a model is trained, it learns the constants associated with the high-dimensional input.

Ever wondered what neural networks are and how they work? Systems like ChatGPT use neural networks to work as well as they do. Neural networks are composed of "layers" of neurons, layers with different functions; connections between layers called "weights"; and mathematical functions called "activation functions". If you’re interested in learning about these systems, check the comments. Ultimately, the neural network structure of the model serves to visually demonstrate that it is, in fact, a complex mathematical equation. When companies release the model's weights, they are releasing a key component needed to run the model's complete equation. Without the weights, the equation is incomplete. For the math-minded: the weights of a model are the learned numbers (they are variables during training) that are then used as constants in the mathematical functions that make up the model. Neural networks are ultimately just one big, hyper-complex mathematical function, and when a model is trained, it learns the constants associated with the high-dimensional input.

Harper Carroll

37,460 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

MIT HANDED ITS DEEP LEARNING COURSE TO A FRONTIER-LAB ENGINEER FOR 68 MINUTES BECAUSE 90% OF PEOPLE SHIPPING AI CODE CAN'T EXPLAIN HOW THE MODEL ACTUALLY WORKS This is Maxime Labonne. He runs post-training at Liquid AI and wrote the LLM Engineer's Handbook. MIT gave him the room to break down the engine sitting inside every coding agent you've ever prompted. Twenty minutes in it stops being abstract. You finally see why the model confidently invents things that don't exist, why context is everything, and why "Just tell it to try again" sometimes fixes it and sometimes makes it worse. In 2026 "I use AI to code" stopped being a skill. Knowing why the model behaves the way it does -> tokens, context, post-training, where it quietly breaks -> is what separates someone who ships from someone babysitting a black box. Understanding an LLM isn't a research-team luxury anymore -> it's the difference between driving the agent and being driven by it. Anyone can prompt. The person who knows what's under the hood is the one still standing when the prompt stops working. Save this one & actually finish it ↓

MIT HANDED ITS DEEP LEARNING COURSE TO A FRONTIER-LAB ENGINEER FOR 68 MINUTES BECAUSE 90% OF PEOPLE SHIPPING AI CODE CAN'T EXPLAIN HOW THE MODEL ACTUALLY WORKS This is Maxime Labonne. He runs post-training at Liquid AI and wrote the LLM Engineer's Handbook. MIT gave him the room to break down the engine sitting inside every coding agent you've ever prompted. Twenty minutes in it stops being abstract. You finally see why the model confidently invents things that don't exist, why context is everything, and why "Just tell it to try again" sometimes fixes it and sometimes makes it worse. In 2026 "I use AI to code" stopped being a skill. Knowing why the model behaves the way it does -> tokens, context, post-training, where it quietly breaks -> is what separates someone who ships from someone babysitting a black box. Understanding an LLM isn't a research-team luxury anymore -> it's the difference between driving the agent and being driven by it. Anyone can prompt. The person who knows what's under the hood is the one still standing when the prompt stops working. Save this one & actually finish it ↓

slash1s

236,758 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jeff Hinton dismissed gradient descent in the 1970s because he thought models would get stuck. He won the Nobel Prize in 2024 partly for being wrong about that. Every time ChatGPT gets better after a training run, it's because 1.2 billion parameters fell through a wormhole in a loss landscape - not because they crawled downhill one step at a time. This video visualizes exactly what that looks like inside Llama 3.2. 20 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. The misconception that almost stopped AI is more interesting than the solution.

Jeff Hinton dismissed gradient descent in the 1970s because he thought models would get stuck. He won the Nobel Prize in 2024 partly for being wrong about that. Every time ChatGPT gets better after a training run, it's because 1.2 billion parameters fell through a wormhole in a loss landscape - not because they crawled downhill one step at a time. This video visualizes exactly what that looks like inside Llama 3.2. 20 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. The misconception that almost stopped AI is more interesting than the solution.

Eron

128,060 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Someone asked me how you fight a spiritual war when so many are unconscious, and what came out of me was something I didn't plan, but it's how I feel. This is the moment I've been living inside for the last decade. The fear, the doubt, the "how is any of this ever going to work," and the answer that keeps pulling me through it. It's not a strategy. It's not a plan. It's a calling. If you've ever felt paralyzed by how big this is, watch this. If you've ever wondered whether your small piece of this fight even matters, watch this. This is why we don't stop. This is why we can't stop. Amen. 🙏

Someone asked me how you fight a spiritual war when so many are unconscious, and what came out of me was something I didn't plan, but it's how I feel. This is the moment I've been living inside for the last decade. The fear, the doubt, the "how is any of this ever going to work," and the answer that keeps pulling me through it. It's not a strategy. It's not a plan. It's a calling. If you've ever felt paralyzed by how big this is, watch this. If you've ever wondered whether your small piece of this fight even matters, watch this. This is why we don't stop. This is why we can't stop. Amen. 🙏

Del Bigtree

251,925 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Fourier wrapped a signal around a circle in 1822. Every Spotify equalizer, every noise filter in your AirPods, and every frequency layer inside ChatGPT runs on what he found. The trick is simple. Spin the signal at different speeds. When the spin matches a hidden frequency, the center of mass shifts. That shift is the answer. Claude and GPT use this same idea to separate relevant tokens from noise. 20 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. The math is older than the telephone.

Fourier wrapped a signal around a circle in 1822. Every Spotify equalizer, every noise filter in your AirPods, and every frequency layer inside ChatGPT runs on what he found. The trick is simple. Spin the signal at different speeds. When the spin matches a hidden frequency, the center of mass shifts. That shift is the answer. Claude and GPT use this same idea to separate relevant tokens from noise. 20 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. The math is older than the telephone.

Eron

57,222 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Ever wonder why every single motel in America is owned by a Patel? Or how the Indian caste system actually works? This video explains the whole thing. Plot twist for my fellow Americans: we are the untouchables to them. CyberGreen09

Ever wonder why every single motel in America is owned by a Patel? Or how the Indian caste system actually works? This video explains the whole thing. Plot twist for my fellow Americans: we are the untouchables to them. CyberGreen09

Texas Spectator

84,982 просмотров • 28 дней назад

Every waveform in nature is just exponentials added together. The Laplace Transform tells you exactly how much of each one — and that single idea turns unsolvable differential equations into basic algebra. ChatGPT, Claude, every robot arm and circuit on the planet runs on systems analyzed with this tool. Engineers don't solve equations by hand anymore. They read the poles. 19 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. This is the most useful transform in engineering.

Every waveform in nature is just exponentials added together. The Laplace Transform tells you exactly how much of each one — and that single idea turns unsolvable differential equations into basic algebra. ChatGPT, Claude, every robot arm and circuit on the planet runs on systems analyzed with this tool. Engineers don't solve equations by hand anymore. They read the poles. 19 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. This is the most useful transform in engineering.

Eron

51,996 просмотров • 17 дней назад