Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

‼️ASHLEY ST CLAIR DROPS DIRE WARNING: “If You Thought Taking Back Power Was HARD Before… AI Will Make It IMPOSSIBLE”— The FBI Is ALREADY Targeting Protesters Ashley St. Clair just went full red-pill on the AI/data center takeover and it should terrify every single American. She says if you...

97,918 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

James Fishback says Byron Donalds is LYING about data centers! Says this has nothing to do with China and it’s all about GREED. “There are 4,200 data centers in the United States. There are 470 in China. We've already won the AI war. My grandfather was a computer science major at Florida Atlantic University about 30 minutes south of here in Boca. And he would tell you that in the 1970s and 80s, computers were the size of Costco warehouses and now those same computers fit in our pocket. Why are we building an AI data center that in five years is going to be obsolete, is going to be one one hundredth of the size. And so I fear it's because a lot of the big land developers want to buy up cheap land, flip it for the next AI data center. So it's a greedy thing. It's a greed thing. And I don't want that to happen in our state because you know what? If you buy something and you screw up, you can return it. You could sell it. If you pave over citrus groves or the Everglades or a wetlands to build the data center, you cannot easily undo that. And so I don't want our farmers, I don't want our rural towns to be run roughshod over. My opponent, Byron Donalds, will say, well, what about the AI data center? Don't they have property rights? And I would say to him, what about the property rights of the people who live a hundred feet from the data center? Where there is EMF, where there is audible noise pollution, where there is the potential even for small radioactive waves? What happens in that case? Do they not have property rights? They don't have to live next to something like that.”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

27,295 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says Silicon Valley is still underestimating AI and it’s disproportionately hurting democrats: “If you’re going to disrupt the economic and political power of the democrat base— and you believe that’s going to work out politically— you're in an insane asylum.” “This technology disrupts humanities-trained, largely democratic voters, and makes their economic power, less. And increases the power of vocationally trained, working class (often male) voters.” “These disruptions are going to disrupt every aspect of our society.” “To make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology, and how we’re going to explain to people who are likely going to have less good, and less interesting jobs from their perspective…” “These technologies are dangerous societally. The only justification you could possibly have is— if we don’t do it, our adversaries will, and we’ll be subject to their rule of law.” “If you decouple this from the support of the military, you’re going to have an enormous problem explaining to be American people— why is it we’re observing the risk of disrupting the very fabric of our society, if it’s not because it’s about maintaining our ability to be American?” “If you don’t believe it— look at the battlefield. What do you think the Chinese and Russians are saying about what they’re seeing on the battlefield right now? They’re not saying this is some incremental technology.” “They’re saying, ‘Wait— the last time we saw America fight it was Afghanistan and nothing worked.’”

Jawwwn

66,645 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Some of us have been working and thinking about AI, started before most in AI today were born. To them they absolutely believe they have a lock of the dystopian fear. The saw too many Hollywood movies. I first say the VHS in the 1980s and the opening dialog never left me. The value of experience is it allows you to understand the way of things before the inexperienced can put their shoes on. Another example to learn in this video is Japan was the center of the universe. There was largess and I dare say arrogance. They absolutely were convince they would control AI via the government. It did not work out that way, like it ALWAYS does not work out that way. Each generation has to learn the hard lessons that should be obvious. A renegade group in Canada no one cared about to the thread all others dropped and you have AI today because of it. They were the last group to have been seen by the industry to have produced anything. Today the same playbook is being implemented by the largest AI companies full of zero experience and begging for big daddy government to save us from their scary monster. We turn the lights and show it is just some shadows. The entry prediction is accurate already, yet the world did not end. Watch this and see how really immature so many leaders are acting. Who will save us, millions of open source AI developers making thousands of AI models. And inventing the stuff the central controlled commissars never could have thought of. This is always the way it is. It is not “different” this time. They are too immature to know. Give them grace. Now you know better. Now you know. Speak up.

Brian Roemmele

15,451 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The entire AI boom has hit a physical wall that no chip can break: America does NOT have enough electricity to run what these companies are building. You don't form an emergency coalition around a problem you've solved. You form one around a problem that's beating you. This morning Nvidia, Google, and a startup called Emerald AI launched something called the AI Energy Management Alliance. 18 members, including the AI lab Anthropic, the utility National Grid, and the power producers AES and NRG. The stated mission: Data centers will become "good citizens" of the grid, gently easing their power use in the rare hours the system is stressed, protecting your electricity bill and keeping the lights on for everyone else. But read what Nvidia said underneath the press release: Power has become "the defining constraint" on the expansion of AI infrastructure in the United States. The most valuable company in history, the one selling every chip the boom runs on, just told you the ceiling on its own business is the number of watts the country can physically deliver. So what is this alliance actually for? It's a lobbying group. And its real ask is this: Right now a new data center can wait a decade or more to connect to the grid, because utilities have to build for the worst hour of the year. The alliance wants governors and regulators to let any data center that promises to throttle its power during peak hours skip that line and plug in faster and bigger. And the grid is already buckling, and you're already paying for it. On PJM, the largest grid in America, serving 67 million people across 13 states, the wholesale cost of power jumped 76% in a single year. The independent market monitor pinned it directly on data centers and said the damage "is not reversible." Capacity prices in that market went from about $29 per megawatt-day to $329, roughly 11 times higher, and data centers drove most of it. This summer PJM had to beg households to cut their usage during a heat wave to avoid rolling blackouts. That's the backdrop the word "affordability" is doing so much work against. Now look at what the alliance actually brings to fix it: Google runs a demand-response program of roughly 1 gigawatt. Emerald and Nvidia have run 6 demonstrations. The first genuinely flexible AI data center they can point to is a single 100 megawatt site in Virginia that isn't even switched on yet. That's the pilot they're holding up against a buildout measured in tens of gigawatts, ordered years in advance, and already raising your rates today. So strip the civics off it and here's what actually happened: The best-funded companies on Earth just formed a coalition whose entire premise is that they need permission to sometimes use LESS electricity. They are announcing that the grid ran out of room before the models ran out of ambition, and they would like to jump the queue while you cover the upgrades. This has nothing to do with strength. Every earlier limit on AI was just a number on a slide, whether it was compute or funding or chip supply, and every one of them got solved with more money. This one can't be solved that way. You cannot venture-fund a power plant into existence in a quarter, and you cannot print a transmission line. Electricity is the first ceiling the AI industry can't buy its way through, and today it admitted that while dressing it up as a favor to your utility bill.

Ricardo

18,509 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen