Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Ashley St. Clair, professional grudge-holder and ideological turncoat, is back on her favorite hobby: trying to damage Elon Musk's public image any way she can. This time she's weaponizing a very convenient outrage: Grok apparently let some people create and post bikini pictures of her. According to her dramatic...

25,821 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

I genuinely cannot understand how someone can watch this story and still stand there, looking at two women, and somehow decide that the wrong one is the victim. On one side, you have a girl (Yıldız) who has been mistreated her entire life. Since the moment she was born, she was treated like a sacrifice for a conflict she was never even part of and later we find out that this conflict never even existed. Her right to study was taken from her. She was pushed into a marriage at a very young age just imagine being six, seven, eight years old, living in fear of being tied to someone you don’t even know. She was treated like a servant in her own home, by the very people she thought were her family. And just when she gets close to the happiness she dreamed of, the man she was engaged to shows up with another wife. She gets mistreated by that wife, by his family, and even (unintentionally) by him, because he was trying to run away from his own feelings, and that only caused her more heartbreak. The whole world was literally against her. She fought through all of that, only to find out in the end that everything she suffered for was based on something that wasn’t even real. Her entire life was built on a lie. That she isn’t even part of that family that she has literally no one in this world. Now on the other side… You have a girl (Melek) who, yes, was taken from her biological mother but she was raised by loving parents. She had everything anyone could wish for: education, freedom, a happy childhood, a healthy environment. She lived her life, fell in love, went out, made choices and no one questioned her, no one controlled her. And then what did she do? She found out that her man was engaged to another woman before marrying her (and even saw him marry her) and instead of holding on to her dignity, she chose to stay, to fight for a man who lied to her, to hold onto a marriage he tried to end multiple times. She used her unborn child to keep him tied to her. She lied constantly, and her excuse was that she was “protecting her marriage” a marriage that was already broken from the moment Serhat removed that ring at the airport in episode one. She tried to hand Yıldız (a woman who had already suffered enough) over to dangerous people. Then she found out the truth about her own birth (that her father ra*ped her mother.)And still no empathy. No moment of humanity toward her own mother. All she cared about was herself. And even though none of this had anything to do with Yıldız, she still found a way to blame it on her. Instead of holding her father accountable, she went and made a deal with him to get rid of Yıldız. She literally made a deal with the devil just to hurt Yıldız one more time. And after all of that… you want me to feel sorry for her? You want me to call her a victim? I honestly cannot believe we are living on the same planet with people who see this and still say, “she’s the victim.” Not morally. Not logically. Not emotionally. There is no world where this makes sense. It’s like watching someone clearly cause harm, and still calling them the victim and actually BELIEVING it. #HalefKöklerinÇağrısı

Maurora🫦

10,530 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Michael Mann on the pivotal scene in Heat when Ashley Judd’s character Charlene chooses to warn Chris instead of giving him up to the police - despite knowing what it’s going to cost her: “In this scene, I confess I’m stunned with how wonderful Ashley Judd is; the expressions on her face as she processes all her options and what she has to do - and then she waves them off. She’s established early in the film as a practical, emotionally mature adult trying to put together a small family. And those are her values. They are family values. She knows that she ought to cooperate with the police and she ought to let Chris (Val Kilmer) fall. That would protect her child, and no instinct is more profound or powerful than the maternal instinct she has right there. And she’s set up for us to expect that she will do exactly that- even though the anguish would be intense, she would give up Chris to protect the family unit that remains. But when she goes to do that on the porch, she sees him and can’t help herself. She’s in love with the guy. You can see her face processing those choices, the endearment she feels for him, and then she does the irrational act and waves them off. In that moment, we see a look on Ashley’s face, we see a sense of what her future is going to be — which is going to be grim. And it’s there again when she closes her eyes as Drucker tells Vincent that the man was not Chris. But of course - it was. And then this is the final moment of Ashley Judd/Charlene Shiherlis in the film: an awareness of the separation from her man, an awareness of what her future holds for her. And with Chris, there’s a parallel moment of realization.” From the director’s commentary track off the Heat Blu-ray

Gangster Cinema Central

92,728 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

‼️Erika Kirk Just Posted NEW Vacation Pics To Her IG And I Have Questions Who Is The "MYSTERY MAN" With Her And WHY Is She Trying To Pass Someone Elses Kid Off As Gigi? 👀 On the anniversary of Charlie’s death, Candace sat down on her show and read the letters she has been writing to him in Heaven. People felt that because it was raw. It was ugly in the right way. It was a friend who is actually mourning him. Erika saw how that landed. Then she posts this family fishing clip with a caption written like a letter to Charlie. That is not grief. That is her watching what worked and running the same playbook. She has already admitted she researched how widows grieve. She said there is no blueprint. She did not feel it. She had to study it. This post is no different. The comments clocked it immediately — cringe, staged, fake. A person who cannot feel it copies the person who can. Now look at the video. That little girl on the deck in the pink Crocs, tie-dye hoodie, and baby fishing pole is not her daughter Gigi. Three weeks ago she posted Gigi at the Cubs–Diamondbacks game in the big 04 jersey, standing at the rail. Gigi is taller and older. So who is she hugging in this new clip? Who is she teaching to fish while she captions it like a letter to Charlie? Why pass someone else’s child off as her own? And who is the adult male in the white shirt sitting on that deck? This is supposed to be a private family trip. Who is close enough to be there with her and those kids? Who is holding the camera? Could that be Blake Wynn — the same guy she was caught with at the Beverly Hills Hotel — or another man she will not name? Charlie answered his critics to their face with more speech. He brought them to the front of the line. Erika stays quiet in public and directs her proxies to attack anyone who simply notices. If Erika Kirk will not answer these three basic questions — why copy Candace’s letters, who is that mystery little girl, and who is the man she trusted enough to take on a private family vacation around her kids — she is proving the point for us. Night and day from the man she claims to be mourning. ⚠️As you guys know this is now day 13 of no monetization. Now more than ever we rely on the support of our community to keep the Charlie Kirk investigation alive. If you value our work and want to support us, you can click the link in the post below to donate to our fundraiser. 👇

Project Constitution

168,718 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

#山根涼羽 Zunchan was clarifying something she said in her seitansai speech that seems to have been misunderstood after only a certain part was clipped and shared online. What she meant was never that AKB was “better” than KLP, or that she was criticizing KLP, Malaysia, or the people around her there. She explained that she is genuinely grateful for the environment she had in KLP, and at the same time, her experience in Malaysia made her realize how many things in AKB she had previously taken for granted. With KLP, they were essentially building a 48 Group and its idol culture from the ground up in a place where that system and environment were not already established. There were a lot of fun experiences, but naturally there were also difficult things that came with having to create something from scratch. Because she went through that experience, when she returned to AKB, she became more aware of all the things that were already established and prepared for the members there, and it made her feel grateful for the AKB environment as well. She specifically emphasized that this was NOT about saying one place was better than the other. She said that both places were wonderful to her, both were places she loved, and that was what she had wanted to convey. She also mentioned that some Malaysian fans had misunderstood what she meant, and clarified that she never intended for her words to be used to attack anyone. So I hope people can listen to what she is actually saying here rather than judging her based only on a clipped portion of her speech. Her point was about gaining a new appreciation for both environments through her experiences in each of them, not putting one down to praise the other.

Tina 🍉

17,578 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce