Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

At a hearing, Senator Ron Johnson systematically dismantled the narrative surrounding COVID mRNA vaccines, exposing a legacy of deception and the brutal cost of "injection injuries" the public was told didn't exist. He began by cornering a witness on the fundamental science they clearly didn't understand. The mRNA in...

53,991 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

It’s embarrassing to watch the TGA tie itself up in knots and contradict itself over the safety of the vaccine. The mRNA vaccine is designed to attack your own cells because the antigen sits on the cell membrane. The T-cell which responds to the vaccine antigen can’t separate your cell from the spike protein. It kills both and the TGA has already admitted as much in the past conceding myocarditis is an autoimmune response. The spike proteins are not rapidly degraded as numerous studies have shown they last in the body for up to 60 days. But more importantly the mRNA is designed to last much longer and produce more proteins. This means the body produces a much larger concentration of the toxic spike protein than what the virus would have delivered. And I quote from one study: “Later studies documented similar effects for 5-methylcytidine and 2-thiouridine and observed that modified mRNAs produced 10- to 100-fold more protein compared with unmodified mRNAs. Recently, N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ), the modification used in the current mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, was found to possess superior characteristics to Ψ; m1Ψ elicited less immunogenicity and increased protein production by more than an order of magnitude relative to Ψ.” And another on the Poly-A tail increases the duration. “Whether for the mRNA vaccine from Pfizer/BioNtech® laboratories or that of Moderna®, the two mRNA sequences end in a Poly(A) tail. The purpose of this addition is to increase the stability of the mRNA in biological medium and also to allow the recruitment of the ribosome, in order to initiate an efficient translation. After translation, the mRNA can be reused several times, but when this happens, it also loses part of the Adenines of its Poly(A) tail, as enzymatic degradation begins there, which only ensures a transient protection against this degradation. When this tail is too degraded, the mRNA is no longer functional and is destroyed. The poly(A) tail stabilizes mRNA and boosts protein translation, and the length of the poly(A) tail is proportional to translation efficiency. It is a critical factor in determining the longevity of mRNA molecules.” Long story short - the TGA continues to lie. Quotes from: #auspol

Gerard Rennick

62,522 views • 1 year ago

The Great Lie of "Safe Mercury" in Vaccines, Exposed. They told you the mercury in vaccines is the "good" kind. They told you it leaves the body quickly. They told you it's safer than the mercury in a tuna fish sandwich. According to RFK Jr., they knew it was a lie. And he has the evidence. The claim that ethylmercury (Thimerosal) is rapidly excreted originated with its creator, Eli Lilly, in 1930—with zero scientific backing. Decades later, it became a mantra, seemingly validated by a 2003 CDC study (Pichichero) that showed mercury from vaccines vanishing from children's blood within days, while mercury from tuna remained for weeks. But world-renowned toxicologists asked the critical question: "Where did the ethylmercury go?" It wasn't in the blood, sweat, urine, or hair. So, the NIH commissioned a definitive monkey study (Burbacher). The results were damning: • The vaccine mercury did quickly clear the blood, just as in the children. • But when researchers examined the monkeys' brains, they made a shocking discovery. • The monkeys who received the vaccine-preservative mercury had MORE THAN DOUBLE the mercury in their brains compared to the tuna-fed monkeys. • Worse, the ethylmercury had metabolized into inorganic mercury, a highly toxic form that can persist in the brain for decades. The "good mercury" was not only staying in the body—it was targeting the brain more aggressively than its so-called "bad" counterpart. RFK Jr. recounts a recorded conversation with Dr. Paul Offit, a leading vaccine advocate, who repeated this "good mercury vs. bad mercury" fairytale. When confronted with the Burbacher monkey study, Offit fell silent, admitted the original study didn't prove the claim, and promised to "get back to him." He never did. The truth is mercury is cumulative. FDA internal studies have shown children receive mercury exposures from vaccines hundreds of times over safety limits. While industry defenders correctly state we are exposed to mercury from other environmental sources, injecting a potent neurotoxin directly into the bloodstream—one that crosses the blood-brain barrier and lodges itself there—is not a solution. It's a catastrophic part of the problem. This isn't a medical debate. It's a betrayal of public trust. The science has been clear for years, and they know it.

Camus

80,662 views • 9 months ago

A bombshell video, resurfaced by Del Bigtree of The High Wire, exposes a stunning admission from a Pfizer executive that cuts to the heart of the COVID-19 vaccine mandate debacle. During a scientific discussion, a Pfizer SVP of Vaccine R&D is asked fundamental questions about their mRNA product: - How does the dosage relate to the amount of spike protein produced? - How many cells are commandeered to manufacture this foreign protein? - How long does this production last inside the human body? His response? A masterclass in evasion and alarming ignorance. He admits, "We don't have a complete understanding of the nature of the way that the vaccine works in terms of producing an immune response." He dismisses these critical mechanistic questions as "somewhat academic." Let that sink in. This was not an experimental therapy for the terminally ill. This was a product mandated for billions, a condition of employment for millions, and hailed as a scientific triumph. As Del Bigtree powerfully frames it: This is not science; it is reckless speculation. It is like children mixing chemicals to see what happens, only here, the experiment was performed on the entire global population without their informed consent. They claimed 95% efficacy. They claimed it stayed in the arm. They claimed they knew it was safe and effective. Yet, at the highest levels, they admit they did not even understand how it worked. The "science" they demanded we "trust" was, by their own admission, incomplete. This video is a permanent indictment of the entire coerced vaccination campaign. It reveals that the emperor had no clothes, and the cost of that deception is a stain on modern history.

Camus

232,556 views • 9 months ago

A chilling warning from Brussels: The foundational flaw in mRNA technology that the public was never told. At the launch of Make Europe Healthy Again, researcher Panagis Polykretis delivered a critical message the world needs to hear. While the pharmaceutical industry rushes to expand mRNA use for its speed and profit, a fundamental immunological principle is being overlooked: Any cell that produces a foreign protein is marked for destruction by the immune system. This isn't theoretical. Clear histopathological evidence from biopsies and autopsies confirms the vaccine's genetic material does not stay at the injection site. It enters systemic circulation and spreads uncontrollably throughout the body, including to vital organs like the brain and heart. Once there, the body's own cells are forced to produce the foreign antigen, triggering an immune attack on its own tissues. This is the mechanism behind serious adverse effects, such as myocarditis—a condition Polykretis was the first to hypothesize from the mRNA vaccines. Most alarmingly, this was known. The European Medicines Agency's own assessment report (Pfizer study 185350) from Feb 19, 2021, states on page 47 that biodistribution in rats to most tissues occurred within 48 hours. They knew. Yet, millions across Europe, including pregnant women and infants, were inoculated with these products. This mass experiment was enabled by the silence of the scientific majority. The time for accountability and rigorous, long-term safety studies is now, before this technology is expanded further.

Camus

103,305 views • 8 months ago