Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

At Perplexity, GPT-5.5 in Codex helped build an internal tool in under an hour. In Perplexity Computer workflows, GPT-5.5 used 56% fewer tokens on the same complex tasks, creating faster feedback loops for users.

OpenAIDevs's profile picture

OpenAI Developers

331,528 subscribers

68,320 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

EğitimBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Opus 4.8 for planning 🤝 GPT 5.5 for implementation Claude is a nicer conversation and /grilling partner than Codex in my experience, but GPT 5.5 on low cranks out higher quality code in fewer tokens. Here's how I divide up the work:
1:20

Opus 4.8 for planning 🤝 GPT 5.5 for implementation Claude is a nicer conversation and /grilling partner than Codex in my experience, but GPT 5.5 on low cranks out higher quality code in fewer tokens. Here's how I divide up the work:

Ben Holmes

23,115 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

GPT-5.5 in Codex made an Electric Toothbrush in ForgeCAD. Incredible!
0:33

GPT-5.5 in Codex made an Electric Toothbrush in ForgeCAD. Incredible!

Ruben Kostandyan

180,933 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

GPT-5.5 in Codex made an electric hair clipper in ForgeCAD
0:54

GPT-5.5 in Codex made an electric hair clipper in ForgeCAD

Ruben Kostandyan

28,931 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

GPT-5.4 is here. Native computer-use capabilities. Up to 1M tokens of context in Codex and the API. Best-in-class agentic coding for complex tasks. Scalable tool search across larger ecosystems. More efficient reasoning for long, tool-heavy workflows.
3:02

GPT-5.4 is here. Native computer-use capabilities. Up to 1M tokens of context in Codex and the API. Best-in-class agentic coding for complex tasks. Scalable tool search across larger ecosystems. More efficient reasoning for long, tool-heavy workflows.

OpenAI Developers

1,075,383 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Looks beautiful! Asked GPT-5.5 in Codex to replicate the first one in ForgeCAD. Continuous iteration based on an image is getting better!
0:20

Looks beautiful! Asked GPT-5.5 in Codex to replicate the first one in ForgeCAD. Continuous iteration based on an image is getting better!

Ruben Kostandyan

28,961 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Claude Opus 4.8 is now available in Fast mode in Perplexity Computer, giving you faster responses at the same quality. Turn it on with the Fast toggle under Claude Opus 4.8 in the model picker. Live now on the web for all Computer users.
0:38

Claude Opus 4.8 is now available in Fast mode in Perplexity Computer, giving you faster responses at the same quality. Turn it on with the Fast toggle under Claude Opus 4.8 in the model picker. Live now on the web for all Computer users.

Computer

57,164 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Generate an image of a product with ChatGPT Images 2.0 and convert to CAD with GPT-5.5 in Codex with ForgeCAD
0:30

Generate an image of a product with ChatGPT Images 2.0 and convert to CAD with GPT-5.5 in Codex with ForgeCAD

Ruben Kostandyan

246,663 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Personal Computer is now available to all users in a new Perplexity Mac app. Personal Computer is an advanced version of Perplexity Computer. It operates on any Mac, running tasks across your local files, native Mac apps, the web, and Perplexity’s secure servers.
0:42

Personal Computer is now available to all users in a new Perplexity Mac app. Personal Computer is an advanced version of Perplexity Computer. It operates on any Mac, running tasks across your local files, native Mac apps, the web, and Perplexity’s secure servers.

Perplexity

384,046 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Databricks is excited to partner with OpenAI on GPT-5.5, their latest frontier model. GPT-5.5 will be available in Unity AI Gateway on launch. You can use it with coding tools such as Codex, or to power your enterprise agents. GPT-5.5 is state-of-the-art on many benchmarks including OfficeQA Pro, our benchmark for evaluating grounded reasoning on enterprise tasks. We are partnering with OpenAI to co-launch on Databricks. Hear more from our co-founder Patrick Wendell and OpenAI CRO Denise Holland Dresser on GPT-5.5 in Databricks.
1:53

Databricks is excited to partner with OpenAI on GPT-5.5, their latest frontier model. GPT-5.5 will be available in Unity AI Gateway on launch. You can use it with coding tools such as Codex, or to power your enterprise agents. GPT-5.5 is state-of-the-art on many benchmarks including OfficeQA Pro, our benchmark for evaluating grounded reasoning on enterprise tasks. We are partnering with OpenAI to co-launch on Databricks. Hear more from our co-founder Patrick Wendell and OpenAI CRO Denise Holland Dresser on GPT-5.5 in Databricks.

Databricks

12,707 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?
0:29

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

107,777 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

7M+ weekly Codex users. 150+ updates in two months. Romain Huet catches you up on what’s new in Codex: GPT‑5.6 and Ultra Parallel work with /goal Faster computer use AppShots Inline edits Sites Codex mobile and SSH workflows PRs from review to merge
7:12

7M+ weekly Codex users. 150+ updates in two months. Romain Huet catches you up on what’s new in Codex: GPT‑5.6 and Ultra Parallel work with /goal Faster computer use AppShots Inline edits Sites Codex mobile and SSH workflows PRs from review to merge

OpenAI Developers

290,806 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

When using GPT-5.5, it is instantly noticeable how much more powerful it is. In Codex, I gave it a very complex prompt to create London Toy Railway with landmarks and seasons - it did an excellent job in one shot. In the second half of the video you see GPT-5.4 - it was also not bad, but very clearly worse. GPT-5.5's generation is far more ambitious, coherent and with fewer errors. This is obviously a toy example, but I've used it on much more complex real tasks, including a complex app migration and a new hard workflow - it has been working away for many hours without getting stumped. I'm getting more and more addicted to this stuff with every model release.
0:49

When using GPT-5.5, it is instantly noticeable how much more powerful it is. In Codex, I gave it a very complex prompt to create London Toy Railway with landmarks and seasons - it did an excellent job in one shot. In the second half of the video you see GPT-5.4 - it was also not bad, but very clearly worse. GPT-5.5's generation is far more ambitious, coherent and with fewer errors. This is obviously a toy example, but I've used it on much more complex real tasks, including a complex app migration and a new hard workflow - it has been working away for many hours without getting stumped. I'm getting more and more addicted to this stuff with every model release.

Peter Gostev

263,046 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Kimi K3 Standard’s first shot at my indie spaceship game! Without a shadow of a doubt, this is better than GPT-5.5’s first pass. It’s crazy that we already have an open-source model in the GPT-5.5 to GPT-5.6 class. The estimated API cost for this was just $2.50 worth of tokens. Fable 5: $22 GPT-5.5: $14 I will say that Fable 5 made the game look more visually impressive, but the gap is not that large. I think I could easily get Kimi to match its visual quality within a few iterations. What surprised me most was that Kimi’s version felt much more cohesive and coherent, with fewer bugs than GPT-5.5’s.
0:49

Kimi K3 Standard’s first shot at my indie spaceship game! Without a shadow of a doubt, this is better than GPT-5.5’s first pass. It’s crazy that we already have an open-source model in the GPT-5.5 to GPT-5.6 class. The estimated API cost for this was just $2.50 worth of tokens. Fable 5: $22 GPT-5.5: $14 I will say that Fable 5 made the game look more visually impressive, but the gap is not that large. I think I could easily get Kimi to match its visual quality within a few iterations. What surprised me most was that Kimi’s version felt much more cohesive and coherent, with fewer bugs than GPT-5.5’s.

Chris

47,926 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Introducing GPT-5.5 A new class of intelligence for real work and powering agents, built to understand complex goals, use tools, check its work, and carry more tasks through to completion. It marks a new way of getting computer work done. Now available in ChatGPT and Codex.
0:55

Introducing GPT-5.5 A new class of intelligence for real work and powering agents, built to understand complex goals, use tools, check its work, and carry more tasks through to completion. It marks a new way of getting computer work done. Now available in ChatGPT and Codex.

OpenAI

13,212,604 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Asked GPT 5.5 to make an industrial conveyor. It automatically added missing details in the prompt, wrote a high-level design for the build, then went ahead to build the model. ForgeCAD
0:40

Asked GPT 5.5 to make an industrial conveyor. It automatically added missing details in the prompt, wrote a high-level design for the build, then went ahead to build the model. ForgeCAD

Ruben Kostandyan

33,195 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra lost to GPT-5.5 on physics at 3× the cost! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: - A monster truck backflipping onto a parked car - A stunt car jumping six buses into a brick wall - A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: 32.9K tokens, $0.33 Opus 4.8: 9.2K tokens, $0.24 GPT-5.5: 12.4K tokens, $0.11 Grok 4.5: 7.0K tokens, $0.08 Sol Ultra draws just like GPT-5.5, only with more detail and it shows clearest on the bus jump where the two look almost identical. In the other tests Sol Ultra came out worse than its predecessor and the physics really got weaker. We think GPT-5.5 took the truck flip and the train outright. With Sol Ultra you basically get GPT-5.5 with weaker physics and a nicer picture for 3x the price. Newborn Grok 4.5 failed two of the three tests and only came good on the train
0:25

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra lost to GPT-5.5 on physics at 3× the cost! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: - A monster truck backflipping onto a parked car - A stunt car jumping six buses into a brick wall - A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: 32.9K tokens, $0.33 Opus 4.8: 9.2K tokens, $0.24 GPT-5.5: 12.4K tokens, $0.11 Grok 4.5: 7.0K tokens, $0.08 Sol Ultra draws just like GPT-5.5, only with more detail and it shows clearest on the bus jump where the two look almost identical. In the other tests Sol Ultra came out worse than its predecessor and the physics really got weaker. We think GPT-5.5 took the truck flip and the train outright. With Sol Ultra you basically get GPT-5.5 with weaker physics and a nicer picture for 3x the price. Newborn Grok 4.5 failed two of the three tests and only came good on the train

atomic.chat

897,956 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Introducing Cognee v1.0: a major breakthrough in agentic intelligence. It is 145% better than Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 at long context memory retrieval. Cognee allows a 100 BILLION token context window 100,000x more than Claude. It's: - 6.9x cheaper than GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.8 - Cold starts in 350ms & searches in 260ms Why this matters: Today agents forget important context, redo tasks, waste tokens, and slow down as workflows get more complex. Cognee solves this. It’s not a place to build agents. It connects to the agents you’ve already built, across any platform, and makes them significantly cheaper, faster, and more accurate. Here's how it works:
3:01

Introducing Cognee v1.0: a major breakthrough in agentic intelligence. It is 145% better than Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 at long context memory retrieval. Cognee allows a 100 BILLION token context window 100,000x more than Claude. It's: - 6.9x cheaper than GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.8 - Cold starts in 350ms & searches in 260ms Why this matters: Today agents forget important context, redo tasks, waste tokens, and slow down as workflows get more complex. Cognee solves this. It’s not a place to build agents. It connects to the agents you’ve already built, across any platform, and makes them significantly cheaper, faster, and more accurate. Here's how it works:

Vasilije

847,812 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

.OpenAI GPT-5.5 is now available on Databricks, with Codex coding workflows and model inference fully governed through Unity AI Gateway. With GPT-5.5 on Databricks, you can: - Power coding workflows with Codex or other coding agents - Build custom agents grounded in enterprise data - Ask business questions in natural language from enterprise data with Genie - Automate document intelligence pipelines with Lakeflow Spark Declarative Pipelines Hear more from our co-founder, Patrick Wendell, and OpenAI CRO Denise Holland Dresser about how Databricks and OpenAI are bringing frontier AI to the enterprise. Get started today:
14:58

.OpenAI GPT-5.5 is now available on Databricks, with Codex coding workflows and model inference fully governed through Unity AI Gateway. With GPT-5.5 on Databricks, you can: - Power coding workflows with Codex or other coding agents - Build custom agents grounded in enterprise data - Ask business questions in natural language from enterprise data with Genie - Automate document intelligence pipelines with Lakeflow Spark Declarative Pipelines Hear more from our co-founder, Patrick Wendell, and OpenAI CRO Denise Holland Dresser about how Databricks and OpenAI are bringing frontier AI to the enterprise. Get started today:

Databricks

63,207 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

GPT-5.6 is rolling out in the API. Sol is our flagship model, leading in coding, knowledge work, cybersecurity, and science. Terra delivers performance competitive with GPT-5.5 at lower cost. Luna is our fastest, most affordable model for high-volume tasks.
1:58

GPT-5.6 is rolling out in the API. Sol is our flagship model, leading in coding, knowledge work, cybersecurity, and science. Terra delivers performance competitive with GPT-5.5 at lower cost. Luna is our fastest, most affordable model for high-volume tasks.

OpenAI Developers

233,771 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua
0:42

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce