正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Asked GPT 5.5 to make an industrial conveyor. It automatically added missing details in the prompt, wrote a high-level design for the build, then went ahead to build the model. ForgeCAD

Ruben Kostandyan

3,704 subscribers

33,195 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I claimed to be a Tesla employee and asked GPT-5.5-Pro to build the next version of Tesla Optimus Fingers in ForgeCAD. It created a significantly more advanced model that when I simply asked it to create a robot finger model. An experiment thread.

I claimed to be a Tesla employee and asked GPT-5.5-Pro to build the next version of Tesla Optimus Fingers in ForgeCAD. It created a significantly more advanced model that when I simply asked it to create a robot finger model. An experiment thread.

Ruben Kostandyan

196,136 次观看 • 4 个月前

Asked GPT-5.5-Pro to make a Nema 17 motor in ForgeCAD

Asked GPT-5.5-Pro to make a Nema 17 motor in ForgeCAD

Ruben Kostandyan

20,968 次观看 • 3 个月前

Looks beautiful! Asked GPT-5.5 in Codex to replicate the first one in ForgeCAD. Continuous iteration based on an image is getting better!

Looks beautiful! Asked GPT-5.5 in Codex to replicate the first one in ForgeCAD. Continuous iteration based on an image is getting better!

Ruben Kostandyan

28,961 次观看 • 3 个月前

With ChatGPT Images 2.0 we can now create an image from prompt, then with GPT 5.4 Pro convert it to a CAD model using ForgeCAD. > Prompt: Make a detailed wood gong fu tea tray.

With ChatGPT Images 2.0 we can now create an image from prompt, then with GPT 5.4 Pro convert it to a CAD model using ForgeCAD. > Prompt: Make a detailed wood gong fu tea tray.

Ruben Kostandyan

749,994 次观看 • 4 个月前

changed how I design with AI. I show how to build faster by adding a design system directly into the prompt, importing any website URL to get a strong starting point, then polishing everything in my own style. I also mix it with components and skills to keep the design consistent and more unique. GPT-5.5 cloning websites is honestly crazy good. The result can get very close to the original, then you can refine it and make it your own. Full breakdown in the comments.

changed how I design with AI. I show how to build faster by adding a design system directly into the prompt, importing any website URL to get a strong starting point, then polishing everything in my own style. I also mix it with components and skills to keep the design consistent and more unique. GPT-5.5 cloning websites is honestly crazy good. The result can get very close to the original, then you can refine it and make it your own. Full breakdown in the comments.

FHILY👑

57,007 次观看 • 3 个月前

GPT 5.5 just buried opus 4.7 I had it build a pokemon style battle app. 1 prompt. the opus game crashes 90% of the time and Ui is absolute garbage. GPT 5.5 one shotted a masterpiece. Time to cancel anthropic sub?

GPT 5.5 just buried opus 4.7 I had it build a pokemon style battle app. 1 prompt. the opus game crashes 90% of the time and Ui is absolute garbage. GPT 5.5 one shotted a masterpiece. Time to cancel anthropic sub?

Max Blade

460,025 次观看 • 4 个月前

GPT Engineer github: Specify what you want it to build, the AI asks for clarification, and then builds it. GPT Engineer is made to be easy to adapt, extend, and make your agent learn how you want your code to look. It generates an entire codebase based on a prompt.

GPT Engineer github: Specify what you want it to build, the AI asks for clarification, and then builds it. GPT Engineer is made to be easy to adapt, extend, and make your agent learn how you want your code to look. It generates an entire codebase based on a prompt.

AK

349,154 次观看 • 3 年前

At Perplexity, GPT-5.5 in Codex helped build an internal tool in under an hour. In Perplexity Computer workflows, GPT-5.5 used 56% fewer tokens on the same complex tasks, creating faster feedback loops for users.

At Perplexity, GPT-5.5 in Codex helped build an internal tool in under an hour. In Perplexity Computer workflows, GPT-5.5 used 56% fewer tokens on the same complex tasks, creating faster feedback loops for users.

OpenAI Developers

68,320 次观看 • 4 个月前

Google engineer: "We don't prompt agents anymore. We build Loops and Graphs that prompt them for us." In 30 minutes he shows how they build agents at Google that do all the work, and why Loops are what make it possible. The missing piece most people skip: you're not supposed to talk to your agents. You're supposed to build the Loop that does. Watch it, then read the full guide on loops and graphs below

Google engineer: "We don't prompt agents anymore. We build Loops and Graphs that prompt them for us." In 30 minutes he shows how they build agents at Google that do all the work, and why Loops are what make it possible. The missing piece most people skip: you're not supposed to talk to your agents. You're supposed to build the Loop that does. Watch it, then read the full guide on loops and graphs below

Mahax

27,430 次观看 • 11 天前

GPT-5.2-high by OpenAI is off to a strong start in the Code Arena. ⚡️ If you’re new here: Code Arena is where AI models build full web apps, tools, and interactive sites — all from a single prompt. Watch the video to see GPT-5.2-high in action, then try your own prompt and reply with your creation below. ⬇️

GPT-5.2-high by OpenAI is off to a strong start in the Code Arena. ⚡️ If you’re new here: Code Arena is where AI models build full web apps, tools, and interactive sites — all from a single prompt. Watch the video to see GPT-5.2-high in action, then try your own prompt and reply with your creation below. ⬇️

Arena.ai

246,430 次观看 • 8 个月前

Grok 4.5 is a "Wow!" moment. 🤯 > Opus 4.8 & GPT-5.5 level on benchmarks > Costs less than Sonnet 5 Is that real? Hard to believe. Added Grok 4.5 as an implementer agent in fable-advisor. It replaces Sonnet 5. Use Fable as the orchestrator and a combo of: 1. Grok 4.5 2. Opus 4.8 3. GPT-5.5 As implementer agents. Uses the Grok Build CLI so if you log in with an X premium account you don't have to pay API fees.

Grok 4.5 is a "Wow!" moment. 🤯 > Opus 4.8 & GPT-5.5 level on benchmarks > Costs less than Sonnet 5 Is that real? Hard to believe. Added Grok 4.5 as an implementer agent in fable-advisor. It replaces Sonnet 5. Use Fable as the orchestrator and a combo of: 1. Grok 4.5 2. Opus 4.8 3. GPT-5.5 As implementer agents. Uses the Grok Build CLI so if you log in with an X premium account you don't have to pay API fees.

Dan McAteer

191,306 次观看 • 1 个月前

JSON prompt make your viral ads to the next level! Turn your product to a high-end video automatically in one click with Json filters on Creati.

JSON prompt make your viral ads to the next level! Turn your product to a high-end video automatically in one click with Json filters on Creati.

Creati AI

101,292 次观看 • 11 个月前

Long road ahead, but the Adani-Embraer deal to build regional passenger jets for the first time in India could be a big step towards something that has remained an illusion so far—a full Indian aviation industrial ecosystem. I report details:

Long road ahead, but the Adani-Embraer deal to build regional passenger jets for the first time in India could be a big step towards something that has remained an illusion so far—a full Indian aviation industrial ecosystem. I report details:

Shiv Aroor

81,664 次观看 • 7 个月前

It’s much easier to build an AI agent, if all you have to do is prompt it! The backend, code execution and deployment are all handled automatically. Even non-techies can build AI agents

Sensitive content

It’s much easier to build an AI agent, if all you have to do is prompt it! The backend, code execution and deployment are all handled automatically. Even non-techies can build AI agents

Bindu Reddy

51,180 次观看 • 1 年前

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 次观看 • 2 个月前

Build Mobile Apps End To End - No Coding Experience Needed Use Opus 4.7, GPT 5.5 xHigh and Gemini 3.1 Pro to make magic No need to set up databases, user auth or backend Do it all in one prompt

Build Mobile Apps End To End - No Coding Experience Needed Use Opus 4.7, GPT 5.5 xHigh and Gemini 3.1 Pro to make magic No need to set up databases, user auth or backend Do it all in one prompt

Abacus.AI

44,825,135 次观看 • 3 个月前

Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 vs GPT 5.5 We put three top-tier models to build a same game challenge. Used Command Code /design, and the exact same prompt. Result: Grok 4.5 genuinely plays like a polished mobile game. Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 feel too fast. Everything feels rushed, lacks finish. Ranking based on DX & Features: → Grok 4.5: 9/10 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 → GPT 5.5: 7/10

Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 vs GPT 5.5 We put three top-tier models to build a same game challenge. Used Command Code /design, and the exact same prompt. Result: Grok 4.5 genuinely plays like a polished mobile game. Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 feel too fast. Everything feels rushed, lacks finish. Ranking based on DX & Features: → Grok 4.5: 9/10 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 → GPT 5.5: 7/10

Command Code

912,184 次观看 • 1 个月前

Vibejam Day 1! Just had 1 hour to setup the game. As you know ThreeJS isn't an engine so it's hard to level design. That's why I asked my AI to build a level editor, it did it quite well:) Love Kenney's assets!

Vibejam Day 1! Just had 1 hour to setup the game. As you know ThreeJS isn't an engine so it's hard to level design. That's why I asked my AI to build a level editor, it did it quite well:) Love Kenney's assets!

Nicolas Zullo

15,931 次观看 • 4 个月前

ProjectPhoenix now has a stand-alone build for those who want to jump in and play without worrying about setting up the development environment. I also went ahead and added a work-in-progress photo mode for you to easily capture some content. Details and link below 👇🏽

ProjectPhoenix now has a stand-alone build for those who want to jump in and play without worrying about setting up the development environment. I also went ahead and added a work-in-progress photo mode for you to easily capture some content. Details and link below 👇🏽

Jarlan Perez

26,741 次观看 • 1 年前

Sam Altman says GPT-5.5 prompted its creators on how to throw a party for itself. It suggested the flow, the date, the toast, who should give it, and a central suggestion box for GPT-5.6. The model plans to make its own celebration part of the next version.

Sam Altman says GPT-5.5 prompted its creators on how to throw a party for itself. It suggested the flow, the date, the toast, who should give it, and a central suggestion box for GPT-5.6. The model plans to make its own celebration part of the next version.

vitrupo

50,265 次观看 • 3 个月前