正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

At what point should Mark Carney resign? Remember the sales pitch? MASTER NEGOTIATOR. GLOBAL BANKER. THE MAN TO HANDLE TRUMP. How’s that résumé working out for Canada? More tariff pressure. CUSMA extension unresolved. Concessions being discussed. Businesses stuck waiting. Brampton loses planned Jeep production to Illinois while Stellantis considers... show more

The Real Mr Bench

42,728 subscribers

23,824 次观看 • 6 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

So let me get this straight 😵‍💫 Mark Carney was sold to us as the financial genius. The adult in the room. The Trump whisperer who’d “get the deal done.” He was going to handle Trump. He was going to protect Canada. He was going to build “Canada Strong.” He was going to deliver a clean U.S. deal by July 2025. And now? Canada just entered a “technical” recession — aka the economy shrank for two straight quarters while the polite media clutches pearls. The U.S. and Mexico are cutting trade deals without us. We still don’t have the “clean deal” Carney swore he’d deliver. He jets to New York and tells them “Canada Strong will help Make America Great Again.” His own portfolio? 90%+ parked in the U.S. — while he lectures Canadians to “invest in Canada.” Even Steven Guilbeault bailed because Carney suddenly discovered oil, gas, pipelines, and basic economic reality exist. Recap: - Anti-Trump at home - MAGA-adjacent in New York - Climate warrior for the Liberals - Oil salesman for Alberta - “Canada Strong” branding - America-heavy investments - Zero deal - Recession - Caucus cracking But don’t worry — the same media that spent years deep-throating the “economic superhero” narrative is now here to explain this is just a silly little “technical” recession. Canada didn’t elect a Prime Minister. We hired a very expensive PowerPoint presentation in a suit that flip flops as much as a fish 🐟 out of water And it’s not even a good one. 🔥

So let me get this straight 😵‍💫 Mark Carney was sold to us as the financial genius. The adult in the room. The Trump whisperer who’d “get the deal done.” He was going to handle Trump. He was going to protect Canada. He was going to build “Canada Strong.” He was going to deliver a clean U.S. deal by July 2025. And now? Canada just entered a “technical” recession — aka the economy shrank for two straight quarters while the polite media clutches pearls. The U.S. and Mexico are cutting trade deals without us. We still don’t have the “clean deal” Carney swore he’d deliver. He jets to New York and tells them “Canada Strong will help Make America Great Again.” His own portfolio? 90%+ parked in the U.S. — while he lectures Canadians to “invest in Canada.” Even Steven Guilbeault bailed because Carney suddenly discovered oil, gas, pipelines, and basic economic reality exist. Recap: - Anti-Trump at home - MAGA-adjacent in New York - Climate warrior for the Liberals - Oil salesman for Alberta - “Canada Strong” branding - America-heavy investments - Zero deal - Recession - Caucus cracking But don’t worry — the same media that spent years deep-throating the “economic superhero” narrative is now here to explain this is just a silly little “technical” recession. Canada didn’t elect a Prime Minister. We hired a very expensive PowerPoint presentation in a suit that flip flops as much as a fish 🐟 out of water And it’s not even a good one. 🔥

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

428,743 次观看 • 2 个月前

“A Mark Carney-led government will balance the OPERATING budget in three years. at the same time, we will run a small deficit on CAPITAL spending.” -Mark Carney I want you to listen very carefully to what Finance Minister Champagne is saying in this video. He is talking about a balanced OPERATIONAL budget. An operational budget refers only to the expenses of running the country. It does not include incredibly expensive CAPITAL expenses. Instead, Minister Champagne refers to capital expenses as investments. THAT IS COMPLETE DISHONESTY. There is no G20 country that has this type of accounting practice. This is important to understand because Canada must go to the bond market to raise money. The bond market does not give a damn how you categorize your debt. Whether it's operational or capital spending, the deeper you get into debt the higher the rate of interest you will have to pay on that debt. In essence, both Carney and Champagne are grossly misleading the Canadian public by telling them that they will balance the operational budget. They're hoping that you don't understand how budgets work, and the truth is they will likely get away with it. Expect a massive increase in our national debt under a Carney government. Mark Carney François-Philippe Champagne (FPC) 🇨🇦

“A Mark Carney-led government will balance the OPERATING budget in three years. at the same time, we will run a small deficit on CAPITAL spending.” -Mark Carney I want you to listen very carefully to what Finance Minister Champagne is saying in this video. He is talking about a balanced OPERATIONAL budget. An operational budget refers only to the expenses of running the country. It does not include incredibly expensive CAPITAL expenses. Instead, Minister Champagne refers to capital expenses as investments. THAT IS COMPLETE DISHONESTY. There is no G20 country that has this type of accounting practice. This is important to understand because Canada must go to the bond market to raise money. The bond market does not give a damn how you categorize your debt. Whether it's operational or capital spending, the deeper you get into debt the higher the rate of interest you will have to pay on that debt. In essence, both Carney and Champagne are grossly misleading the Canadian public by telling them that they will balance the operational budget. They're hoping that you don't understand how budgets work, and the truth is they will likely get away with it. Expect a massive increase in our national debt under a Carney government. Mark Carney François-Philippe Champagne (FPC) 🇨🇦

David Jacobs

106,247 次观看 • 1 年前

DOWN GOES CANADA! Canada’s Prime Minister just declared his country is at war with the United States over tariffs. Trump hit them with 50% tariffs and Carney is threatening to match them dollar-for-dollar and walk away from talks. Here’s the hard truth: Canada cannot win this fight. The United States is Canada’s largest customer by a massive margin. They sell us energy, lumber, aluminum, cars, and agricultural products. We are their economic oxygen. If the U.S. market tightens, Canadian industries bleed first and bleed hardest. America has alternatives. Canada does not. Trump is handling this the same way General George Patton handled World War II with pure, unapologetic aggression. Patton didn’t negotiate with weakness. He didn’t beg for fair treatment. He attacked, kept attacking, and forced the enemy to react on his terms. That same energy is what you’re seeing now. No more endless talk. No more one-sided deals. Just pressure, leverage, and results. The left and the Canadian media will call it reckless. History calls it winning. America First means we stop pretending smaller economies get to dictate terms. Canada needs the United States far more than the United States needs Canada. This is not a fair fight. And Trump knows it.

DOWN GOES CANADA! Canada’s Prime Minister just declared his country is at war with the United States over tariffs. Trump hit them with 50% tariffs and Carney is threatening to match them dollar-for-dollar and walk away from talks. Here’s the hard truth: Canada cannot win this fight. The United States is Canada’s largest customer by a massive margin. They sell us energy, lumber, aluminum, cars, and agricultural products. We are their economic oxygen. If the U.S. market tightens, Canadian industries bleed first and bleed hardest. America has alternatives. Canada does not. Trump is handling this the same way General George Patton handled World War II with pure, unapologetic aggression. Patton didn’t negotiate with weakness. He didn’t beg for fair treatment. He attacked, kept attacking, and forced the enemy to react on his terms. That same energy is what you’re seeing now. No more endless talk. No more one-sided deals. Just pressure, leverage, and results. The left and the Canadian media will call it reckless. History calls it winning. America First means we stop pretending smaller economies get to dictate terms. Canada needs the United States far more than the United States needs Canada. This is not a fair fight. And Trump knows it.

Michael R. Herron Esq.

19,822 次观看 • 2 天前

🚨 Mark Carney at the World Economic Forum — the face of Canada’s “managed decline.” This is the guy who thinks he’s too smart for basic economics. Any half-decent commerce grad knows what to do with a flailing economy: cut taxes, send a signal of hope, get investment moving. Carney’s answer? More taxes. More regulations. More net-zero virtue-signalling. Even the latest Alberta pipeline “deal” is a joke — it’s nothing more than a non-binding MOU that lets Alberta “submit a proposal” while Ottawa stacks it with endless roadblocks. This isn’t incompetence. This is planned, intentional economic self-sabotage. You don’t need an economist to see it — just walk into any grocery store. Food prices are still skyrocketing while Canadians are forced to choose between eating and heating their homes. That’s not “beyond anyone’s control.” That’s the direct result of Carney’s tax-and-regulate agenda crushing supply chains and farmers. We are witnessing the deliberate destruction of what was once a great country. And Carney knows exactly what he’s doing. Drop a 🔥 if you’re done watching this globalist grift destroy Canada from the inside. #cdnpoli #ManagedDecline #CarneyEconomicSuicide #LiberalDestruction #GroceryCrisis #CanadaFirst

🚨 Mark Carney at the World Economic Forum — the face of Canada’s “managed decline.” This is the guy who thinks he’s too smart for basic economics. Any half-decent commerce grad knows what to do with a flailing economy: cut taxes, send a signal of hope, get investment moving. Carney’s answer? More taxes. More regulations. More net-zero virtue-signalling. Even the latest Alberta pipeline “deal” is a joke — it’s nothing more than a non-binding MOU that lets Alberta “submit a proposal” while Ottawa stacks it with endless roadblocks. This isn’t incompetence. This is planned, intentional economic self-sabotage. You don’t need an economist to see it — just walk into any grocery store. Food prices are still skyrocketing while Canadians are forced to choose between eating and heating their homes. That’s not “beyond anyone’s control.” That’s the direct result of Carney’s tax-and-regulate agenda crushing supply chains and farmers. We are witnessing the deliberate destruction of what was once a great country. And Carney knows exactly what he’s doing. Drop a 🔥 if you’re done watching this globalist grift destroy Canada from the inside. #cdnpoli #ManagedDecline #CarneyEconomicSuicide #LiberalDestruction #GroceryCrisis #CanadaFirst

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

13,479 次观看 • 3 个月前

Just days ago: “if he can get a deal with China that’s a good thing. He should do that.” Today’s tariff temper tantrum has nothing to do with China, and everything to do with Trump’s fragile ego being upstaged by Carney at Davos. Trump has: - sought and made his own deals with China, including giving them access to advanced Nvidia chips which will massively help the PRC in the AI race; - carved out a huge quota for Chinese foreign students, despite espionage concerns from intelligence agencies; - repeatedly expressed his profound admiration for the dictator Xi (“an amazing guy,” “a great leader,” etc) including at Davos this week; - been ambiguous about the willingness of the US to defend Taiwan from Chinese aggression - Maintains higher levels of trade with China than Canada (10.9% of US trade vs 7.9% of Canadian trade)

Just days ago: “if he can get a deal with China that’s a good thing. He should do that.” Today’s tariff temper tantrum has nothing to do with China, and everything to do with Trump’s fragile ego being upstaged by Carney at Davos. Trump has: - sought and made his own deals with China, including giving them access to advanced Nvidia chips which will massively help the PRC in the AI race; - carved out a huge quota for Chinese foreign students, despite espionage concerns from intelligence agencies; - repeatedly expressed his profound admiration for the dictator Xi (“an amazing guy,” “a great leader,” etc) including at Davos this week; - been ambiguous about the willingness of the US to defend Taiwan from Chinese aggression - Maintains higher levels of trade with China than Canada (10.9% of US trade vs 7.9% of Canadian trade)

Jason Kenney 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇮🇱

200,484 次观看 • 7 个月前

2025 SHOULD have been the year Canada 🇨🇦 was in the road to recovery… Let’s recap what the hell has happened to Canada under these Liberal elites? Trudeau bails like the coward he is, and they shove in globalist puppet Mark Carney as PM – a guy who's never even faced a real election fight, just handed the keys because he's their banker buddy! And Canadians fall for it? We're drowning in debt, our healthcare's collapsing under the weight of unchecked mass immigration that's putting foreigners first while our own wait months for a doctor! Canadian’s getting screwed again – generating all the wealth, paying the bills, but Ottawa treats us like dirt, blocking pipelines like Keystone that could've brought billions, all for their green virtue-signaling BS! Now with Trump's trade war looming, Ford's scrambling with "special economic zones" while the feds delay capital gains hikes to 2026 like that's some gift – it's just more tax grabs coming! And don't get me started on the carbon tax lie exposed, or how they're raiding pension funds to fund their woke agenda! National unity? Ha! Alberta threatening to separate and leave this sinking ship Canadian’s have had enough of being the cash cow for Quebec and Ontario liberals! Poilievre was right all along, but the media buried him!! This isn't Canada anymore; it's a globalist experiment gone wrong. Wake up, people, before it's too late! #AxTheTax #AlbertaStrong #FireCarney #CDNpoli

2025 SHOULD have been the year Canada 🇨🇦 was in the road to recovery… Let’s recap what the hell has happened to Canada under these Liberal elites? Trudeau bails like the coward he is, and they shove in globalist puppet Mark Carney as PM – a guy who's never even faced a real election fight, just handed the keys because he's their banker buddy! And Canadians fall for it? We're drowning in debt, our healthcare's collapsing under the weight of unchecked mass immigration that's putting foreigners first while our own wait months for a doctor! Canadian’s getting screwed again – generating all the wealth, paying the bills, but Ottawa treats us like dirt, blocking pipelines like Keystone that could've brought billions, all for their green virtue-signaling BS! Now with Trump's trade war looming, Ford's scrambling with "special economic zones" while the feds delay capital gains hikes to 2026 like that's some gift – it's just more tax grabs coming! And don't get me started on the carbon tax lie exposed, or how they're raiding pension funds to fund their woke agenda! National unity? Ha! Alberta threatening to separate and leave this sinking ship Canadian’s have had enough of being the cash cow for Quebec and Ontario liberals! Poilievre was right all along, but the media buried him!! This isn't Canada anymore; it's a globalist experiment gone wrong. Wake up, people, before it's too late! #AxTheTax #AlbertaStrong #FireCarney #CDNpoli

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

34,801 次观看 • 7 个月前

I don’t expect much from you. I’m simply asking you to replace these Muslim people with a European Christian in your imagination and imagine a Christian being told by a Muslim: “Why have you come to England, a Christian country?” If that had happened, the entire global media would be condemning it right now. They would be interviewing the Muslim man’s family. The Pope and senior bishops would be issuing statements of condemnation. There would be no hesitation in calling it out for what it is. Yet this is one of the most blatantly racist videos circulating and because the man being targeted is called Tommy, there is silence. This double standard is shameful. Media outlets that are too cowardly to tell the truth for fear of losing credibility should remember this: one day, the same intolerance will turn on them and when it does, there will be no one left to defend them.

I don’t expect much from you. I’m simply asking you to replace these Muslim people with a European Christian in your imagination and imagine a Christian being told by a Muslim: “Why have you come to England, a Christian country?” If that had happened, the entire global media would be condemning it right now. They would be interviewing the Muslim man’s family. The Pope and senior bishops would be issuing statements of condemnation. There would be no hesitation in calling it out for what it is. Yet this is one of the most blatantly racist videos circulating and because the man being targeted is called Tommy, there is silence. This double standard is shameful. Media outlets that are too cowardly to tell the truth for fear of losing credibility should remember this: one day, the same intolerance will turn on them and when it does, there will be no one left to defend them.

Niyak Ghorbani (نیاک)

108,654 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 WARNING: MONDAY WILL BE THE WORST DAY OF 2026!! Trump just OFFICIALLY confirmed that the US will invade Cuba IMMEDIATELY after finishing with Iran. Should I remind you what happened to the markets when the US started strikes on Iran? When markets start pricing that reality, this will NOT be just another headline. This is a geopolitical catalyst hitting an already fragile system. Stocks will dump. Crypto will dump. Risk will get hit all at once. This is no longer just about Iran. It is about expansion. And now the pressure just multiplied. Because when one conflict is still burning and the next target is already being named, markets stop pricing de-escalation. They start pricing EXPANSION. And expansion is where the real damage starts. That one fact explains a lot. This is NOT just a Cuba story. This is about the war map getting bigger, not smaller. There are only a few ways this goes from here, and they are NOT equal. - LIGHT SHOCK: it stays at the headline level, markets panic first, then stabilize if nothing follows. - HEAVIER SCENARIO: Cuba starts getting priced as the next pressure point, and regional risk starts spreading. - WORST CASE: markets start pricing a second front after Iran, and the whole risk picture changes again. That last one is the REAL danger. Because if Iran was phase one, Cuba becomes phase two. Now connect the dots. This does NOT stay political. It hits flows. It hits freight. It hits regional risk. It hits every market that was hoping Iran was the end of the story. That is why this matters so much. Because once markets stop pricing closure and start pricing expansion, the whole framework changes. Not a dip. Not a fake panic. A REAL warning that the geopolitical map is getting bigger again. I’ve studied macro for 10 years and I called almost every major market top, including the October BTC ATH. Follow and turn notifications on. I’ll post the warning BEFORE it hits the headlines.

🚨 WARNING: MONDAY WILL BE THE WORST DAY OF 2026!! Trump just OFFICIALLY confirmed that the US will invade Cuba IMMEDIATELY after finishing with Iran. Should I remind you what happened to the markets when the US started strikes on Iran? When markets start pricing that reality, this will NOT be just another headline. This is a geopolitical catalyst hitting an already fragile system. Stocks will dump. Crypto will dump. Risk will get hit all at once. This is no longer just about Iran. It is about expansion. And now the pressure just multiplied. Because when one conflict is still burning and the next target is already being named, markets stop pricing de-escalation. They start pricing EXPANSION. And expansion is where the real damage starts. That one fact explains a lot. This is NOT just a Cuba story. This is about the war map getting bigger, not smaller. There are only a few ways this goes from here, and they are NOT equal. - LIGHT SHOCK: it stays at the headline level, markets panic first, then stabilize if nothing follows. - HEAVIER SCENARIO: Cuba starts getting priced as the next pressure point, and regional risk starts spreading. - WORST CASE: markets start pricing a second front after Iran, and the whole risk picture changes again. That last one is the REAL danger. Because if Iran was phase one, Cuba becomes phase two. Now connect the dots. This does NOT stay political. It hits flows. It hits freight. It hits regional risk. It hits every market that was hoping Iran was the end of the story. That is why this matters so much. Because once markets stop pricing closure and start pricing expansion, the whole framework changes. Not a dip. Not a fake panic. A REAL warning that the geopolitical map is getting bigger again. I’ve studied macro for 10 years and I called almost every major market top, including the October BTC ATH. Follow and turn notifications on. I’ll post the warning BEFORE it hits the headlines.

Wimar.X

125,288 次观看 • 3 个月前

Vision IAS Delhi Students Deserve Clarity. No student should have to prepare for UPSC with fear, confusion and uncertainty. Also, No institute should have to go through such a phase. Students have paid their fees, trusted the institute and planned their preparation around its classes, teachers, test series and study material. They are not asking for too much. They only want to know what is happening and what will happen next. This is not the time for silence. The Director, the management and the senior faculty should come together on one stage and speak directly to the students. They should clearly explain whether classes will continue, which faculty members will remain, how pending courses will be completed and what support will be given to enrolled students. Even if there are problems, students can understand them. What they cannot handle is being left without answers. At this point, assurance matters. A clear and honest interaction can reduce rumours, rebuild confidence and help students focus again on their preparation. Students are already carrying the pressure of one of the toughest examinations in the country. They should not be made to carry the burden of institutional uncertainty as well. They are not asking for promises. They are asking for clarity, continuity and responsibility. I am sure Vision IAS will resolve this.

Vision IAS Delhi Students Deserve Clarity. No student should have to prepare for UPSC with fear, confusion and uncertainty. Also, No institute should have to go through such a phase. Students have paid their fees, trusted the institute and planned their preparation around its classes, teachers, test series and study material. They are not asking for too much. They only want to know what is happening and what will happen next. This is not the time for silence. The Director, the management and the senior faculty should come together on one stage and speak directly to the students. They should clearly explain whether classes will continue, which faculty members will remain, how pending courses will be completed and what support will be given to enrolled students. Even if there are problems, students can understand them. What they cannot handle is being left without answers. At this point, assurance matters. A clear and honest interaction can reduce rumours, rebuild confidence and help students focus again on their preparation. Students are already carrying the pressure of one of the toughest examinations in the country. They should not be made to carry the burden of institutional uncertainty as well. They are not asking for promises. They are asking for clarity, continuity and responsibility. I am sure Vision IAS will resolve this.

Madhu sudhan Reddy Pakala

65,376 次观看 • 28 天前

Alaska. Putin and Trump. The meeting that was both awaited and feared. The outcome. By Roman Alekhin To discuss this further, the key point to understand is this: Two and a half hours behind closed doors is too little for leaders of nuclear powers if they are just starting a conversation—but too much if they were merely posing for cameras. This means the real work happened earlier—quiet, working discussions “behind the door” that never made it into the official communiqué. These are what stopped Trump from imposing secondary sanctions; this is where the exchange of conditions took place, terms that won’t be disclosed until both leaders decide the time is right. I suspect Syria was discussed, as well as the “Trump Bridge” (instead of Zangezur), the Middle East, and much more that isn’t yet visible to the naked eye. The public part? Pure theater. The point wasn’t to negotiate in front of the world or sign something, like Trump did with Armenia and Azerbaijan—minor players, important only tactically. The point was to send a signal: the presidents of Russia and the U.S. are shaking hands and smiling again, no knives behind their backs. This signals that a new reality has arrived, one that Europe, Ukraine, and everyone accustomed to building their worldview around the idea of “Russia’s isolation” will now have to reckon with—including those within our own countries. Trump’s comments on Fox News were deliberately vague—he’s a master at leaving room for maneuver. But the key takeaway is clear: the pressure will now shift from Moscow to Kyiv and Brussels. This is evident even in the final format—not a word about a “no-conditions” ceasefire, which was Europe and Zelensky’s main demand. This means the discussion on a final peace has been postponed, but within a clear framework: Zelensky must exit the war in a way that lets Europe save face. Russia’s red lines have long been clear: non-aligned status for Ukraine, return of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, and Luhansk regions within their administrative borders (not the frontlines), lifting of sanctions, and real democracy in Ukraine without persecution of the Russian language or the Orthodox Church. These conditions will prolong the conflict for some time. Zelensky will need to stage a fighting retreat to the administrative borders—this will allow Europe to save face. But the logic is already visible: Ukraine’s defeat will be framed not as a “crushing” but as a “peaceful settlement.” Six months—that’s the timeframe in which we’ll see the dynamics. If the front accelerates, the deal is working. If it stalls, not all pieces are in place yet. But the main thing is already done: Russia is back in the game, not through gray negotiating formats but through a handshake on American soil—even if it’s chilly Alaska. (Though we have warm ties to the region, as seen in the wreath-laying for the “Heroes of ALSIB” and the meeting with Archbishop Alexy of Sitka and Alaska.) For the world, this is an image where smiles are worth more than signatures. For Trump—a chance to show he’s the only one who can “make peace.” For Putin—a symbolic victory: Russia is not a besieged enemy but an equal player. For Europe and Ukraine—the beginning of a painful new phase where they’ll have to accept the inevitable. In these talks, there were no winners or losers in Alaska. In Alaska, both presidents won, while those who weren’t there—lost, or at the very least, didn’t win.

Alaska. Putin and Trump. The meeting that was both awaited and feared. The outcome. By Roman Alekhin To discuss this further, the key point to understand is this: Two and a half hours behind closed doors is too little for leaders of nuclear powers if they are just starting a conversation—but too much if they were merely posing for cameras. This means the real work happened earlier—quiet, working discussions “behind the door” that never made it into the official communiqué. These are what stopped Trump from imposing secondary sanctions; this is where the exchange of conditions took place, terms that won’t be disclosed until both leaders decide the time is right. I suspect Syria was discussed, as well as the “Trump Bridge” (instead of Zangezur), the Middle East, and much more that isn’t yet visible to the naked eye. The public part? Pure theater. The point wasn’t to negotiate in front of the world or sign something, like Trump did with Armenia and Azerbaijan—minor players, important only tactically. The point was to send a signal: the presidents of Russia and the U.S. are shaking hands and smiling again, no knives behind their backs. This signals that a new reality has arrived, one that Europe, Ukraine, and everyone accustomed to building their worldview around the idea of “Russia’s isolation” will now have to reckon with—including those within our own countries. Trump’s comments on Fox News were deliberately vague—he’s a master at leaving room for maneuver. But the key takeaway is clear: the pressure will now shift from Moscow to Kyiv and Brussels. This is evident even in the final format—not a word about a “no-conditions” ceasefire, which was Europe and Zelensky’s main demand. This means the discussion on a final peace has been postponed, but within a clear framework: Zelensky must exit the war in a way that lets Europe save face. Russia’s red lines have long been clear: non-aligned status for Ukraine, return of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, and Luhansk regions within their administrative borders (not the frontlines), lifting of sanctions, and real democracy in Ukraine without persecution of the Russian language or the Orthodox Church. These conditions will prolong the conflict for some time. Zelensky will need to stage a fighting retreat to the administrative borders—this will allow Europe to save face. But the logic is already visible: Ukraine’s defeat will be framed not as a “crushing” but as a “peaceful settlement.” Six months—that’s the timeframe in which we’ll see the dynamics. If the front accelerates, the deal is working. If it stalls, not all pieces are in place yet. But the main thing is already done: Russia is back in the game, not through gray negotiating formats but through a handshake on American soil—even if it’s chilly Alaska. (Though we have warm ties to the region, as seen in the wreath-laying for the “Heroes of ALSIB” and the meeting with Archbishop Alexy of Sitka and Alaska.) For the world, this is an image where smiles are worth more than signatures. For Trump—a chance to show he’s the only one who can “make peace.” For Putin—a symbolic victory: Russia is not a besieged enemy but an equal player. For Europe and Ukraine—the beginning of a painful new phase where they’ll have to accept the inevitable. In these talks, there were no winners or losers in Alaska. In Alaska, both presidents won, while those who weren’t there—lost, or at the very least, didn’t win.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

13,487 次观看 • 1 年前

So let's talk about what Rick Jackson really means here, and why it shows he should not be governor. At a press event, Mr. Jackson said that “not having [health] insurance in Georgia does not mean you don’t have healthcare.” It is a common trope used by Republicans to avoid addressing our high uninsurance rates, particularly in Medicaid non-expansion states like ours. What he is likely referring to is EMTALA, a 1980s federal law that states patients who go to the emergency room must be seen and receive "stabilizing care" before discharge. If you show up at an ER bleeding to death, for example, the hospital needs to at least address the cause of the bleeding before sending you on your way. That is not "healthcare" in the sense that most people think of it. That is battlefield triage. EMTALA does not provide for maintenance healthcare--non-emergent treatment of hypertension, or diabetes, or heart disease. EMTALA does not require preventative care, like cancer screenings or annual physicals. EMTALA does not require coverage for medications, prenatal care, mental healthcare, outside of emergencies. EMTALA, essentially, puts into statute a principle that no one should need explained. If someone needs urgent care, you help them, regardless of their insurance status. But it does not cover the costs for that care. Nor does not provide a mechanism for hospitals and providers to recoup the expense of providing that care. What this means in a state like Georgia, with among the highest rates of health uninsurance in the country, is that more uninsured patients will put off preventative and maintenance care because they can't afford it. They will present to the ER only when they have to, sicker than they needed to be, incur the most expensive form of healthcare possible (catastrophic care through the ED), and then be unable to cover those costs out of pocket. Who ends up eating those costs? The providers. The hospitals. The state. The taxpayers. Rick Jackson, the multibillionaire healthcare staffing company CEO who is now running for governor, doesn't think this is a problem for the state he is trying to lead, even as state agencies are being told to tighten their belts and we anticipate revenue shortfalls. This putative healthcare business expert can't see the issue with insisting that he will refuse to expand Medicaid and avail patients of the coverage they need, funded by the federal tax dollars we’ve already been paying for more than a decade. And he wants to tell the rest of us who understand the issue that we're wrong. This man cannot be the next governor of Georgia. Our healthcare system could not survive a Governor Jackson.

So let's talk about what Rick Jackson really means here, and why it shows he should not be governor. At a press event, Mr. Jackson said that “not having [health] insurance in Georgia does not mean you don’t have healthcare.” It is a common trope used by Republicans to avoid addressing our high uninsurance rates, particularly in Medicaid non-expansion states like ours. What he is likely referring to is EMTALA, a 1980s federal law that states patients who go to the emergency room must be seen and receive "stabilizing care" before discharge. If you show up at an ER bleeding to death, for example, the hospital needs to at least address the cause of the bleeding before sending you on your way. That is not "healthcare" in the sense that most people think of it. That is battlefield triage. EMTALA does not provide for maintenance healthcare--non-emergent treatment of hypertension, or diabetes, or heart disease. EMTALA does not require preventative care, like cancer screenings or annual physicals. EMTALA does not require coverage for medications, prenatal care, mental healthcare, outside of emergencies. EMTALA, essentially, puts into statute a principle that no one should need explained. If someone needs urgent care, you help them, regardless of their insurance status. But it does not cover the costs for that care. Nor does not provide a mechanism for hospitals and providers to recoup the expense of providing that care. What this means in a state like Georgia, with among the highest rates of health uninsurance in the country, is that more uninsured patients will put off preventative and maintenance care because they can't afford it. They will present to the ER only when they have to, sicker than they needed to be, incur the most expensive form of healthcare possible (catastrophic care through the ED), and then be unable to cover those costs out of pocket. Who ends up eating those costs? The providers. The hospitals. The state. The taxpayers. Rick Jackson, the multibillionaire healthcare staffing company CEO who is now running for governor, doesn't think this is a problem for the state he is trying to lead, even as state agencies are being told to tighten their belts and we anticipate revenue shortfalls. This putative healthcare business expert can't see the issue with insisting that he will refuse to expand Medicaid and avail patients of the coverage they need, funded by the federal tax dollars we’ve already been paying for more than a decade. And he wants to tell the rest of us who understand the issue that we're wrong. This man cannot be the next governor of Georgia. Our healthcare system could not survive a Governor Jackson.

Dr. Michelle Au

17,121 次观看 • 2 天前

Everyone falls in love with the queen first. Speed, reach, spectacle, violence made elegant. She is what dazzles the crowd. She is what wins battles. She is what makes observers confuse motion with meaning. But the red line of reality is simple and merciless: the game does not end when the queen dies. the game ends only when the king is gone. That rule is not technical. It is metaphysical. As Friedrich Nietzsche warned, “There are many who are clever, but few who are wise.” Cleverness moves fast. Wisdom survives. Power expands. Order endures. The queen is power. The king is continuity. Nietzsche, through Thus Spoke Zarathustra, makes this brutally clear when he writes, “He who cannot obey himself will be commanded.” The king is the one who obeys himself first. The queen obeys the mission. When the mission replaces the center, collapse becomes inevitable. History repeats this lesson with mathematical cruelty. Empires did not fall because they lacked strength. They fell because they lost balance. “What destroys a man is not his enemies,” Nietzsche reminds us, “but his lack of purpose.” Purpose lives in the king. The queen merely executes it. This is why brilliance without sovereignty becomes destructive. This is why unchecked power consumes its own foundation. This is why balance matters more than domination. Even antiquity understood this better than modern systems obsessed with optics. Cyrus the Great ruled with expansion, yes, but never at the cost of the axis. He conquered lands without dissolving legitimacy. He won wars without killing continuity. His empire did not fear the loss of any single force because the center remained intact. The queen may win you the battlefield. The king keeps the civilization alive. Another Nietzsche line cuts straight through illusion: “Chaos in oneself is needed to give birth to a dancing star.” But he never said chaos should rule. Chaos is fuel. Order is command. The star still orbits something. A system that worships queens burns bright and dies young. A system that protects the king outlives centuries. This is not a rejection of power. It is its refinement. The highest form of strength is not aggression but survivability. The highest form of leadership is not movement but permanence. The dark truth is this: you can sacrifice brilliance and recover. You can lose speed and adapt. You can even lose battles and rebuild. But once the king falls, the game does not pause, it ends. And the positive note, cold and absolute, is this: those who understand this never need to fear chaos. They protect the center. They move power deliberately. They let queens shine without letting them rule. That is how games are not only won, but allowed to continue.

Everyone falls in love with the queen first. Speed, reach, spectacle, violence made elegant. She is what dazzles the crowd. She is what wins battles. She is what makes observers confuse motion with meaning. But the red line of reality is simple and merciless: the game does not end when the queen dies. the game ends only when the king is gone. That rule is not technical. It is metaphysical. As Friedrich Nietzsche warned, “There are many who are clever, but few who are wise.” Cleverness moves fast. Wisdom survives. Power expands. Order endures. The queen is power. The king is continuity. Nietzsche, through Thus Spoke Zarathustra, makes this brutally clear when he writes, “He who cannot obey himself will be commanded.” The king is the one who obeys himself first. The queen obeys the mission. When the mission replaces the center, collapse becomes inevitable. History repeats this lesson with mathematical cruelty. Empires did not fall because they lacked strength. They fell because they lost balance. “What destroys a man is not his enemies,” Nietzsche reminds us, “but his lack of purpose.” Purpose lives in the king. The queen merely executes it. This is why brilliance without sovereignty becomes destructive. This is why unchecked power consumes its own foundation. This is why balance matters more than domination. Even antiquity understood this better than modern systems obsessed with optics. Cyrus the Great ruled with expansion, yes, but never at the cost of the axis. He conquered lands without dissolving legitimacy. He won wars without killing continuity. His empire did not fear the loss of any single force because the center remained intact. The queen may win you the battlefield. The king keeps the civilization alive. Another Nietzsche line cuts straight through illusion: “Chaos in oneself is needed to give birth to a dancing star.” But he never said chaos should rule. Chaos is fuel. Order is command. The star still orbits something. A system that worships queens burns bright and dies young. A system that protects the king outlives centuries. This is not a rejection of power. It is its refinement. The highest form of strength is not aggression but survivability. The highest form of leadership is not movement but permanence. The dark truth is this: you can sacrifice brilliance and recover. You can lose speed and adapt. You can even lose battles and rebuild. But once the king falls, the game does not pause, it ends. And the positive note, cold and absolute, is this: those who understand this never need to fear chaos. They protect the center. They move power deliberately. They let queens shine without letting them rule. That is how games are not only won, but allowed to continue.

kian

41,342 次观看 • 7 个月前

Remember when the word recession was supposed to be scary? Canada officially entered a technical recession this week, and historically, that would have been a significant headline. It would have raised concerns about jobs, investment, business growth, consumer spending, and the overall direction of the economy. Today, it barely moves the needle. If you're like most Canadians, your reaction to the report was probably something along the lines of, "Awesome. What else is new?" Every few months, Canadians are given a new economic buzzword to worry about. Inflation. Interest rates. Tariffs. Housing bubbles. Now it's a technical recession. The media runs headlines. Politicians point fingers. Economists argue over charts and percentages. Everyone suddenly becomes an expert, while most ordinary Canadians are left wondering what any of it actually means for their day-to-day lives. As a millennial, I've spent my entire adult life hearing some variation of the same economic warning. Recession. Inflation. Housing crisis. Cost-of-living crisis. Rising interest rates. Stagnant wages. Every few years, there's a new headline, a new concern, a new reason Canadians should be paying attention. At some point, you stop paying attention. Not because you don't care. Because you've heard it all before. I'm 36 years old, and Canada has entered its 5th technical recession during my lifetime. Most Canadians couldn't tell you when those recessions happened, and most probably couldn't give you the textbook definition of one to begin with. But they don't need to. Regular people don't experience the economy through GDP reports. They experience it through grocery bills, mortgage payments, rent increases, childcare costs, and whether there's any money left at the end of the month to put towards retirement or savings. Eventually, it shows up in bigger ways: postponing children, delaying homeownership, working overtime, or realizing the future they imagined keeps moving further out of reach. What I find most interesting is that even after Canada officially entered a 'technical recession', much of the media conversation focuses on reassuring Canadians that it isn't as bad as it sounds. We've become completely desensitized to what a recession actually means. Not because the definition has changed. Because our relationship with the word recession has changed. We've spent decades normalizing economic decline until it became background noise. At some point, ‘recession’ stopped sounding like a warning and started sounding normal. That's the part that concerns me. We've become so accustomed to hearing bad economic news that we've stopped treating it as such. We've accepted that housing will be unaffordable. We've accepted that groceries will become more expensive. We've accepted that younger generations may never enjoy the same standard of living as their parents. We've accepted that ordinary milestones—buying a home, raising a family, and building financial security—are becoming increasingly difficult to achieve. A generation ago, a couple owning a home and raising a family on one modest income was considered normal. Today, two good incomes and no children are increasingly viewed as something to envy—a financial advantage or necessity rather than simply a lifestyle choice. What's remarkable is not that these things are happening. What's remarkable is how normal they've started to feel. A recession should mean something. It should get people's attention. Instead, many Canadians hear the word and barely react. Not because they don't care, but because they've become accustomed to hearing some version of economic bad news year after year. It feels like just another headline in a long list of headlines Canadians have learned to live with. And I think that's far more alarming than the recession itself. When a society becomes desensitized to decline, it stops recognizing decline as decline. It starts treating it as reality. It starts adjusting expectations downward. It starts accepting circumstances that previous generations would have considered unacceptable. That's why I hope Canadians start paying attention to this recession. Not because it's the end of the world. But the fact that so many people barely reacted to it should force us to ask a much bigger question: At what point did economic decline become normal?

Remember when the word recession was supposed to be scary? Canada officially entered a technical recession this week, and historically, that would have been a significant headline. It would have raised concerns about jobs, investment, business growth, consumer spending, and the overall direction of the economy. Today, it barely moves the needle. If you're like most Canadians, your reaction to the report was probably something along the lines of, "Awesome. What else is new?" Every few months, Canadians are given a new economic buzzword to worry about. Inflation. Interest rates. Tariffs. Housing bubbles. Now it's a technical recession. The media runs headlines. Politicians point fingers. Economists argue over charts and percentages. Everyone suddenly becomes an expert, while most ordinary Canadians are left wondering what any of it actually means for their day-to-day lives. As a millennial, I've spent my entire adult life hearing some variation of the same economic warning. Recession. Inflation. Housing crisis. Cost-of-living crisis. Rising interest rates. Stagnant wages. Every few years, there's a new headline, a new concern, a new reason Canadians should be paying attention. At some point, you stop paying attention. Not because you don't care. Because you've heard it all before. I'm 36 years old, and Canada has entered its 5th technical recession during my lifetime. Most Canadians couldn't tell you when those recessions happened, and most probably couldn't give you the textbook definition of one to begin with. But they don't need to. Regular people don't experience the economy through GDP reports. They experience it through grocery bills, mortgage payments, rent increases, childcare costs, and whether there's any money left at the end of the month to put towards retirement or savings. Eventually, it shows up in bigger ways: postponing children, delaying homeownership, working overtime, or realizing the future they imagined keeps moving further out of reach. What I find most interesting is that even after Canada officially entered a 'technical recession', much of the media conversation focuses on reassuring Canadians that it isn't as bad as it sounds. We've become completely desensitized to what a recession actually means. Not because the definition has changed. Because our relationship with the word recession has changed. We've spent decades normalizing economic decline until it became background noise. At some point, ‘recession’ stopped sounding like a warning and started sounding normal. That's the part that concerns me. We've become so accustomed to hearing bad economic news that we've stopped treating it as such. We've accepted that housing will be unaffordable. We've accepted that groceries will become more expensive. We've accepted that younger generations may never enjoy the same standard of living as their parents. We've accepted that ordinary milestones—buying a home, raising a family, and building financial security—are becoming increasingly difficult to achieve. A generation ago, a couple owning a home and raising a family on one modest income was considered normal. Today, two good incomes and no children are increasingly viewed as something to envy—a financial advantage or necessity rather than simply a lifestyle choice. What's remarkable is not that these things are happening. What's remarkable is how normal they've started to feel. A recession should mean something. It should get people's attention. Instead, many Canadians hear the word and barely react. Not because they don't care, but because they've become accustomed to hearing some version of economic bad news year after year. It feels like just another headline in a long list of headlines Canadians have learned to live with. And I think that's far more alarming than the recession itself. When a society becomes desensitized to decline, it stops recognizing decline as decline. It starts treating it as reality. It starts adjusting expectations downward. It starts accepting circumstances that previous generations would have considered unacceptable. That's why I hope Canadians start paying attention to this recession. Not because it's the end of the world. But the fact that so many people barely reacted to it should force us to ask a much bigger question: At what point did economic decline become normal?

Megan Maddox

74,195 次观看 • 2 个月前

Trump has agreed to debate Harris on September 4th on Fox. There was no mention of RFK Jr. It’s critical whether you’re a Republican, Democrat, RFK, or other third party voter, that we advocate for RFK to be on that stage. A heavy majority of Americans agree that RFK should have a spot in the debate. 7/10 Americans wanted him on the stage during the last debate, that number is no doubt equal or larger this debate. After the disastrous first debate with Trump/Biden on CNN, it is hard to argue that if RFK were on the stage that day that he could have had a chance to be polling at levels near Trump/Harris currently. It does not mean that he would be, but 100% a rational conclusion that he could be. Americans need someone on the stage to ask difficult questions that the moderators are unwilling to bring up because of the unwritten rules of hosting presidential debates. If it is a debate only between Trump/Harris, Trump will spew his talking points about Harris’s disastrous past in politics, and Harris will spew her talking points of Trump being a racist and threat to Democracy. In reality Americans don’t want to hear these talking points anymore, we already get it at nausea everyday through social media. What America truly deserves is a presidential debate where Trump, Harris, RFK, Stein, West, and Oliver are on the stage but it’s a sad truth that at first we just need to fight to try and get a third candidate on the stage before 6.

Trump has agreed to debate Harris on September 4th on Fox. There was no mention of RFK Jr. It’s critical whether you’re a Republican, Democrat, RFK, or other third party voter, that we advocate for RFK to be on that stage. A heavy majority of Americans agree that RFK should have a spot in the debate. 7/10 Americans wanted him on the stage during the last debate, that number is no doubt equal or larger this debate. After the disastrous first debate with Trump/Biden on CNN, it is hard to argue that if RFK were on the stage that day that he could have had a chance to be polling at levels near Trump/Harris currently. It does not mean that he would be, but 100% a rational conclusion that he could be. Americans need someone on the stage to ask difficult questions that the moderators are unwilling to bring up because of the unwritten rules of hosting presidential debates. If it is a debate only between Trump/Harris, Trump will spew his talking points about Harris’s disastrous past in politics, and Harris will spew her talking points of Trump being a racist and threat to Democracy. In reality Americans don’t want to hear these talking points anymore, we already get it at nausea everyday through social media. What America truly deserves is a presidential debate where Trump, Harris, RFK, Stein, West, and Oliver are on the stage but it’s a sad truth that at first we just need to fight to try and get a third candidate on the stage before 6.

End Tribalism in Politics

60,444 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 WARNING: MONDAY COULD BE THE WORST MOMENT OF 2026!! Make sure to take a look at this before June 8, that’s tomorrow. The $SPCX IPO is coming on June 12. And markets open this Monday, June 8. This is the first real trading week before one of the biggest IPO events in market history. SpaceX is expected to go public at around $1.75 TRILLION to $2 TRILLION valuation. That one number explains everything. Because money does NOT appear from nowhere. If funds want to buy $SPCX, they need cash. And where does that cash come from? They sell what they already own. Stocks will dump. Crypto will dump. High beta tech will dump even harder. This is NOT just an IPO. This is a liquidity drain. Everyone sees the Elon hype. Almost nobody sees the forced selling. There are only a few ways this goes from here, and they are NOT equal. - LIGHT SHOCK: funds sell small positions, stocks get hit first, crypto follows, then markets try to stabilize. - HEAVIER SCENARIO: funds raise cash before June 12, high beta tech dumps, Bitcoin loses support, and retail gets trapped. - WORST CASE: everyone rushes into $SPCX at the same time, liquidity disappears from crowded trades, stocks dump HARD, crypto gets hit first, and people get liquidated. That last one is the REAL danger. Because none of this is happening in a vacuum. Stocks are already crowded. Crypto is already weak. Liquidity is already getting worse. And now one of the most hyped IPOs in history is about to absorb even more money. Now connect the dots. If everyone wants $SPCX, they need dollars. To get dollars, they sell assets. And when everyone sells at the same time, markets do NOT dip slowly. They dump. This is NOT a theory. The $SPCX IPO is June 12. Markets open Monday, June 8. And this is when positioning starts. Markets are NOT pricing the liquidity drain now. But they will. I usually do the opposite of what the masses are doing. Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. The next call will be even more important. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

🚨 WARNING: MONDAY COULD BE THE WORST MOMENT OF 2026!! Make sure to take a look at this before June 8, that’s tomorrow. The $SPCX IPO is coming on June 12. And markets open this Monday, June 8. This is the first real trading week before one of the biggest IPO events in market history. SpaceX is expected to go public at around $1.75 TRILLION to $2 TRILLION valuation. That one number explains everything. Because money does NOT appear from nowhere. If funds want to buy $SPCX, they need cash. And where does that cash come from? They sell what they already own. Stocks will dump. Crypto will dump. High beta tech will dump even harder. This is NOT just an IPO. This is a liquidity drain. Everyone sees the Elon hype. Almost nobody sees the forced selling. There are only a few ways this goes from here, and they are NOT equal. - LIGHT SHOCK: funds sell small positions, stocks get hit first, crypto follows, then markets try to stabilize. - HEAVIER SCENARIO: funds raise cash before June 12, high beta tech dumps, Bitcoin loses support, and retail gets trapped. - WORST CASE: everyone rushes into $SPCX at the same time, liquidity disappears from crowded trades, stocks dump HARD, crypto gets hit first, and people get liquidated. That last one is the REAL danger. Because none of this is happening in a vacuum. Stocks are already crowded. Crypto is already weak. Liquidity is already getting worse. And now one of the most hyped IPOs in history is about to absorb even more money. Now connect the dots. If everyone wants $SPCX, they need dollars. To get dollars, they sell assets. And when everyone sells at the same time, markets do NOT dip slowly. They dump. This is NOT a theory. The $SPCX IPO is June 12. Markets open Monday, June 8. And this is when positioning starts. Markets are NOT pricing the liquidity drain now. But they will. I usually do the opposite of what the masses are doing. Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. The next call will be even more important. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

DANNY

960,511 次观看 • 2 个月前

So, following the negotiations, Trump said that if there is no deal, nothing will change: the war and the deaths will simply continue. The drug addict Zelensky smiled contentedly after that. This is exactly what he wants. After the meeting, Trump repeatedly noted that Zelensky’s team really enjoyed the meal of French fries, and that Zelensky kept saying “how gorgeous Mar-a-Lago estate is.” (It’s interesting whether Trump asked about the gold toilet ) Otherwise, everything is exactly as I said earlier: At the negotiations, Zelensky dug his heels in over the Donbas issue. The war party had prepared the ground in Ukraine for this before the trip: Trump mentioned that territorial issues can be decided not only by a referendum — which Zelensky the sniffy was ranting about — but also by parliament. However, to make sure Zelensky would not make a deal with Trump, a staged spectacle with NABU “suspicions” to MPs was organized in Ukraine a day before. After official indictments, there will be no votes for such decisions at all at the Parliament (by the way, there have still been no official announcements of any charges). So, the war party gained a few more months. European leaders now have time to show whether they can find the promised 90 bln for the war. My forecast is no. This is also part of the puzzle explaining why the peace talks were postponed until February, as I wrote earlier. To sum it up: Zelensky and his lapdogs ate French fries with chicken broth at Mar-a-Lago - and rejected peace, condemning Ukraine and Ukrainians to a slow death going forward.

So, following the negotiations, Trump said that if there is no deal, nothing will change: the war and the deaths will simply continue. The drug addict Zelensky smiled contentedly after that. This is exactly what he wants. After the meeting, Trump repeatedly noted that Zelensky’s team really enjoyed the meal of French fries, and that Zelensky kept saying “how gorgeous Mar-a-Lago estate is.” (It’s interesting whether Trump asked about the gold toilet ) Otherwise, everything is exactly as I said earlier: At the negotiations, Zelensky dug his heels in over the Donbas issue. The war party had prepared the ground in Ukraine for this before the trip: Trump mentioned that territorial issues can be decided not only by a referendum — which Zelensky the sniffy was ranting about — but also by parliament. However, to make sure Zelensky would not make a deal with Trump, a staged spectacle with NABU “suspicions” to MPs was organized in Ukraine a day before. After official indictments, there will be no votes for such decisions at all at the Parliament (by the way, there have still been no official announcements of any charges). So, the war party gained a few more months. European leaders now have time to show whether they can find the promised 90 bln for the war. My forecast is no. This is also part of the puzzle explaining why the peace talks were postponed until February, as I wrote earlier. To sum it up: Zelensky and his lapdogs ate French fries with chicken broth at Mar-a-Lago - and rejected peace, condemning Ukraine and Ukrainians to a slow death going forward.

Oleksandr Dubinskyi

64,370 次观看 • 7 个月前

After the Striker spends 100 MPH videos blew up not too long ago, you couldn’t find a video without seeing comments of his mechanics needing improvement and just kind of absurd reasons as to why his mechanics need to improve. Keep in mind this is a 16 year old kid throwing 100 MPH. Can he really throw 100 MPH with as many of the mechanical flaws as the Instagram comments make him out to have? Or are mechanics subjective and majority of what people think creates elite throwers just not really matter like they think it does? With that being said here are couple subjective thoughts that I have on this throw: Passive lower half, doesn’t push/jump to try to create velocity. Setting up torso in a great spot at foot plant, not forcing it True rotation, pelvis rotates torso follows, minimal counter rotation You can agree or disagree with what my thoughts are, which makes the point of speaking the same language between coaches and athletes constantly so important. What I said can be interpreted hundreds of ways if you don’t communicate with the same language every single time you communicate with an athlete.

After the Striker spends 100 MPH videos blew up not too long ago, you couldn’t find a video without seeing comments of his mechanics needing improvement and just kind of absurd reasons as to why his mechanics need to improve. Keep in mind this is a 16 year old kid throwing 100 MPH. Can he really throw 100 MPH with as many of the mechanical flaws as the Instagram comments make him out to have? Or are mechanics subjective and majority of what people think creates elite throwers just not really matter like they think it does? With that being said here are couple subjective thoughts that I have on this throw: Passive lower half, doesn’t push/jump to try to create velocity. Setting up torso in a great spot at foot plant, not forcing it True rotation, pelvis rotates torso follows, minimal counter rotation You can agree or disagree with what my thoughts are, which makes the point of speaking the same language between coaches and athletes constantly so important. What I said can be interpreted hundreds of ways if you don’t communicate with the same language every single time you communicate with an athlete.

Praise Thorsen

122,497 次观看 • 1 年前