Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Attorney Aaron Siri delivers a blistering testimony exposing the broken vaccine system. At the largest vaccine practice in the world, Siri’s team relies on hard data, not credentials, to litigate cases. He dismantles claims like “COVID vaccines saved 3M lives,” citing a Commonwealth Fund blog—not peer-reviewed science—but a mathematical...

127,245 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Jim Land's profile picture
Jim Land1 year ago

Siri mentions this in his speech

SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple's profile picture
SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple2 years ago

😔600+ healthcare data breaches exposed over 40 MILLION patient records last year. 💸The average cost of a healthcare data breach is $10.1 MILLION! 💔Protect your patients! Knowledge is power.💪 The "CYBERSECURITY DICTIONARY For Everyone" is on Amazon 🛒

Jim Land's profile picture
Jim Land1 year ago

Aaron Siri is great, he is a true Champion for the Vaccine Injured & serves as a great counterbalance to all the paid gaslighters including the legacy, bought off Media (which remains silent)

Betsy dickson's profile picture
Betsy dickson1 year ago

I would love to hire you to attempt to get any type of restitution for my Covid “vaccine” injury however it’s clear none of us ever will be compensated for being permanately disabled. The compensation would never make me whole however it would mean I would have some type of justice. This liability immunity must end. Nowhere else can you create a product known to kill and never be sued. I understand why you can’t help me but it’s a disgrace the government knowingly mandated such horrific death shots and protects companies committing genocide. I was naive and ignorant to how corrupt healthcare and the government is before this horrific mistake I made. I didn’t have informed consent - none of us did. Pharmacists should not be allowed to give vaccines, either. They can’t possibly give proper risk advise. They’re not your doctor. I’ll never trust a doctor again. I’ll never seek healthcare again unless I am about to die and even then might just die in misery. Hell I won’t even subject my dogs to another vaccine. It’s all a dice roll on if you’ll be disabled or worse.

Jim Land's profile picture
Jim Land1 year ago

Mentions the 1986 Act also which of all Congressional laws has done more harm to children than any other in the history of the United States.

Diana Estill's profile picture
Diana Estill1 year ago

So here we have also the explanation for why the mNRA shots had to be called “vaccines,” and why the definition of ”vaccine” had to be changed.

Prof. Rod's profile picture
Prof. Rod1 year ago

This should be on every lame-stream media outlet tonight and every night! ... Two chances of that ever happening: 1. Fat 2. Slim

Sarah Geving's profile picture
Sarah Geving1 year ago

He’s incredible. This was an amazing and shocking hearing.

RexesRule ⚓USN ⚓😺 🦝's profile picture
RexesRule ⚓USN ⚓😺 🦝1 year ago

Aaron is a hero!

JamieT's profile picture
JamieT1 year ago

They really are no different than the late 1800s and early 1900s snake oil salesmen...The only science Big Pharma follows is the science of fear and gullibility. P.T. Barnum was a piker compared to them.

Related Videos

Attorney Aaron Siri exposes that not one childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule was licensed with a true placebo-controlled trial, as chronic diseases skyrocket in kids. Is this why over 50% of children now face a health crisis? Attorney Aaron Siri’s explosive testimony exposes a critical gap in vaccine safety research that demands attention. As Siri detailed in his 66-page submission to Congress, not a single routine childhood vaccine on the CDC’s current schedule (except COVAXIN for ages 12+) was licensed based on a clinical trial using a true placebo control group. If a control group received another vaccine, that vaccine also lacked a placebo-controlled trial. These claims are backed by FDA clinical trial documents—undeniable evidence that challenges the narrative of “settled science.” Siri’s testimony raises a pressing question: Why haven’t we studied the safety of childhood vaccines with the rigor they deserve? He points to a pandemic of chronic disease plaguing America’s children. In the early 1980s, less than 13% of kids had a chronic illness. Today, over 50% suffer from conditions like asthma, allergies, and autoimmune disorders—many rooted in immune dysregulation. What’s changed? Siri notes the CDC’s vaccine schedule has ballooned from 3 injections in 1986 to 29 by age one today, including in utero shots. This staggering increase, coupled with the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act shielding manufacturers from design defect liability, raises red flags. Siri argues we must investigate all environmental factors—including vaccines—driving this crisis. The absence of long-term, placebo-controlled trials leaves a gaping hole in our understanding of vaccine safety. When Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pressed Dr. Anthony Fauci for such studies, none were produced. CDC and FDA officials, when questioned, have similarly failed to provide evidence. Siri’s call to action is clear: we need transparent, unbiased research to rule out vaccines as a contributor to the chronic disease epidemic. “We’re in a pandemic right now,” he warns, urging HHS Secretary nominee Kennedy to prioritize this issue. The health of our children hangs in the balance. Will we have the courage to demand answers, or will we ignore the data staring us in the face?

Camus

347,476 views • 1 year ago

From 7 Shots to 84: The 1986 Law That Made Vaccine Makers Untouchable Attorney Aaron Siri highlights a stark legal anomaly: vaccines are the only product where the US government, via DOJ attorneys, defends the manufacturer against injured consumers in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). This system was born from a crisis. Leading up to 1986, the CDC schedule included just 3 routine childhood vaccines (DTP, OPV, MMR) totaling 7 injections. Liability from these few products was so catastrophic that it drove every manufacturer to exit the market, risking the nation's vaccine supply. Congress's response was the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. But instead of mandating safer products, the law took a different path. Siri describes the "original sin" as two-fold: 1. It allowed companies to continue selling products known to cause harm without the pressure to make them safer. 2. It granted them comprehensive legal immunity for all future vaccines. This fundamental shift, Siri argues, altered the entire landscape. It changed how clinical trials are conducted and fostered a culture where regulators see themselves as "partners with manufacturers." The result of this protected, liability-free market? A childhood schedule that has ballooned from 3 vaccines and 7 injections to 19 vaccines and 84 injections. The law designed to save the vaccine supply may have also removed the core incentive for safety innovation, fueling an unprecedented expansion.

Camus

38,411 views • 10 months ago

Vaccine Safety "Pyramid Scheme" Exposed: The Shocking Truth They Never Wanted You to See In an amazing presentation, attorney Aaron Siri drops a truth bomb that should be heard by every parent, doctor, and policymaker. He systematically dismantles the most common defense of the childhood vaccine schedule: the claim that they were tested against saline placebos. Siri reveals a chart, built from years of work and sourced directly from FDA documents, that tracks the clinical trials for every single routine injected childhood vaccine. The categorical finding? Not one. Not a single one. Here is the stunning reality: - No Saline Placebos: There has NEVER been a routine injected childhood vaccine licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial using an inert saline solution. - The "Pyramid Scheme" of Safety: Instead, new vaccines are tested against older vaccines, which were themselves tested against even older ones. This creates a "daisy chain" where safety is only ever compared to another product that also lacked a true safety baseline. - The Proof is in the FDA's Own Documents: The source for this chart is the FDA's website. As Siri states, "If you don't agree with this information... you're arguing with the FDA." Some of the most shocking examples: - Hepatitis B: The first vaccines for newborns were licensed with no control group at all. - PCV (Pneumococcal): The original Prevnar 7 was tested against another experimental vaccine—a practice Siri compares to testing a new cancer drug against another unproven cancer drug. - Polio (IPOL): The modern IPV vaccine, a completely different technology from the Salk vaccine, was licensed with a safety review of just three days and no control group. - MMR: The clinical trials for the current MMR II, which uses human fetal cell lines, used no control group. - HPV (Gardasil): The "placebo" used in trials for thousands of young girls was not saline. It often contained the aluminum adjuvant—a known neurotoxin with no therapeutic benefit—effectively rigging the trial to mask true adverse event rates. This rigged system allows serious adverse event rates in healthy children to creep into the 7%, 8%, and even 9% range in clinical trials. Because the control group gets a similarly reactive shot, the numbers appear "similar" and are deemed "safe," hiding the true risk. The bottom line: The entire childhood vaccine schedule rests on a foundation that has never been properly tested for safety against an inert placebo. The baseline safety profile for these products is, and has always been, unknown. This isn't an opinion. It's a fact documented by the FDA itself. If this doesn't make you question everything, what will?

Camus

474,385 views • 10 months ago

The Unsettling Truth: Not One Childhood Vaccine Was Tested Against a True Placebo In a Senate hearing, attorney Aaron Siri was asked by Sen. Ron Johnson to clarify the research behind childhood vaccines. His answer was staggering. Siri submitted a 66-page document to the Senate citing FDA clinical trial data. His finding? NOT A SINGLE routine childhood vaccine on the current CDC schedule was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial where the control group received an inert saline placebo. The "control" groups were given another vaccine—which itself was not tested against a true placebo. This circular referencing means the entire schedule lacks a foundational gold-standard safety benchmark. Why does this matter? Because we are in the midst of a silent pandemic. A pandemic of chronic disease. Since the early 1980s, chronic illness in American children has skyrocketed from under 13% to over 50%. Most of these diseases—asthma, allergies, autoimmune disorders—are forms of immune system dysregulation. What has changed in that same timeframe? The childhood vaccine schedule. In 1986, when vaccine manufacturers were granted legal immunity, the schedule was 3 injections. Today, a child following the full CDC schedule receives 29 injections by their first birthday, including in utero. Every one of those vaccines was licensed by a company that knew it would not be liable for any injuries. In the face of a catastrophic rise in childhood chronic illness, is it not the most basic duty of public health to honestly and transparently investigate all environmental insults, including the exponential increase in vaccines? This isn't anti-vax. It's pro-science. It's a demand for the rigorous safety science our children deserve.

Camus

96,137 views • 1 year ago

RFK Jr. just made bombshell claims about childhood vaccines, and what he said will make you question everything At the Children's Health Defense conference, RFK Jr. didn't hold back. Here's what he claimed: The vaccine schedule exploded He says kids went from just 3 vaccines when he was growing up to a staggering 18 vaccines and 94 doses today. He claims this explosion started in the early 1990s, and nobody's asking why. The hepatitis B trial was tiny He claims the hepatitis B vaccine was licensed based on a trial of only 147 infants... monitored for just 5 days... with no placebo. For a shot given to millions of babies every year? He says that's not just inadequate - it's alarming. Only one vaccine was ever placebo-tested? Here's the one that shocked the room: He claims that out of all 94 doses and 18 vaccines, only the COVID vaccine was ever tested against a placebo. The rest? He says we have no real safety data. The insert lists diseases He pointed to vaccine package inserts listing adverse events like autoimmune disease, lupus, Guillain-Barré, seizures, diabetes, and even sudden infant death syndrome. He says across all 18 vaccines, there are 454 adverse events listed. 99% of injuries go unreported? He claims the vaccine injury reporting system is broken. Citing a 2010 CDC study, he says fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries are ever reported — meaning over 99% vanish without a trace. The science that was never done He says the CDC gave the Institute of Medicine a list of 158 serious child injuries possibly linked to vaccines. He claims the IOM found no science at all for 123 of them, and called for urgent research. That was 2012. He says 13 years later, nothing has been done. Trump's order He says President Trump personally asked him to investigate whether childhood vaccines are fueling the chronic disease epidemic. The statements above are descriptions of claims made by RFK Jr. in his speech. They are not presented as established scientific fact. Readers are encouraged to consult primary sources, peer-reviewed research, and their healthcare providers when evaluating vaccine-related information.

Camus

59,749 views • 8 days ago

In 1986, a one-year-old child received 3 vaccine injections. Today, that number has skyrocketed to 29. This exponential increase hasn't occurred in a vacuum; it's happened within a system deliberately engineered to remove corporate liability and critical oversight. As highlighted in a recent discussion, the core of the issue is a fundamental divergence in how products are regulated. For pharmaceuticals, companies face massive financial and legal repercussions for unsafe products. This necessitates rigorous, long-term, placebo-controlled trials. But for vaccines, the landscape is entirely different. As legal expert Aaron Siri often outlines, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a paradigm shift. Vaccine manufacturers were granted a critical shield: they would no longer be liable for injuries caused by their products. This changed everything. The incentive structure was flipped. Without the threat of class-action lawsuits or product liability claims—the primary drivers of corporate accountability in every other industry—what kind of safety trials were conducted? The answer, as detailed in numerous analyses, is trials that are profoundly inadequate: - Duration: Days or weeks of safety review. - Design: No true placebo controls. - Scale: Insufficient numbers of children to detect rarer, long-term adverse events. For 40 years, this industry has operated with virtually no meaningful pushback. When your car or a child's car seat has a defect, you hear about it because of massive legal action. That signal is silenced for vaccines. So, who is minding the ship? The two traditional guardians of public safety are both compromised: 1. The Legal System: Class-action attorneys have been entirely neutered by the 1986 law. 2. Federal Health Agencies: These bodies are caught in an irreconcilable conflict of interest. They are tasked with both promoting vaccination and defending vaccines in the government's Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). They are, in effect, the cheerleader and the judge for the same product. The result is a system that operates on pure economic and bureaucratic momentum. Pharmaceutical companies, like any good business, promote their products through trusted intermediaries. There is no conspiracy—only a system operating exactly as designed, with conflicts of interest baked into its foundation. Understanding this framework—the lack of liability, the weakened trials, the neutered legal system, and the conflicted regulators—is key to demystifying the last four decades of vaccine policy. It’s not about the science; it’s about the structure.

Camus

103,550 views • 11 months ago