Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🇨🇳 Australia panics when a Chinese naval task force sails past its waters, screaming as if Sydney suddenly stopped belonging to Australia. But when U.S., U.K., and Japanese warships parade through the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait every single year, that’s “freedom of navigation,” not provocation. As Zhou... Bo said in his interview, China doesn’t need “spheres of influence,” its influence is already global. And the PLA’s overseas missions are humanitarian, not the endless military adventures the West has normalized. This is why the West is getting increasingly uncomfortable: they’ve spent decades treating Asia like an open playground for their militaries, and now a non-Western power is simply strong enough to play by the same rules, without asking permission. And Europe still insists China is the “threat,” while the U.S. is literally trying to forcibly buy Greenland, bomb Venezuela, threaten Colombia, and kidnap foreign presidents. The reality is simple: The West isn’t afraid of China’s actions. It’s afraid of losing its monopoly on them. And in the coming years, life will only get harder for countries stuck between a declining America that “eats whatever it can swallow,” and a rising China that no longer tolerates being pushed around. History is changing, and the loudest voices in the West are the ones who feel it slipping through their fingers.show more

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

46,570 subscribers

57,177 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

China’s message on Taiwan was not routine diplomatic language. Xi did not simply “raise the Taiwan question.” He framed it as the most important issue in China-U.S. relations, warned of collision, conflict, and dangerous consequences, and made clear that “Taiwan independence” and peace across the Strait cannot coexist. That is the part many people are missing. In 2017, China was still telling Washington not to let Taiwan “disturb” bilateral ties. In 2026, China is telling Washington: mishandle Taiwan, and the entire China-U.S. relationship enters danger. Same Trump. Different China. America and the West are still thinking in 2017 terms — trade pressure, symbolic gestures, alliance theater, “strategic ambiguity.” But China is no longer the China Trump met nine years ago. The red line has not moved. The power behind it has.

China’s message on Taiwan was not routine diplomatic language. Xi did not simply “raise the Taiwan question.” He framed it as the most important issue in China-U.S. relations, warned of collision, conflict, and dangerous consequences, and made clear that “Taiwan independence” and peace across the Strait cannot coexist. That is the part many people are missing. In 2017, China was still telling Washington not to let Taiwan “disturb” bilateral ties. In 2026, China is telling Washington: mishandle Taiwan, and the entire China-U.S. relationship enters danger. Same Trump. Different China. America and the West are still thinking in 2017 terms — trade pressure, symbolic gestures, alliance theater, “strategic ambiguity.” But China is no longer the China Trump met nine years ago. The red line has not moved. The power behind it has.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

15,183 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

While the world is watching the Strait of Hormuz, the real power game is shifting to the Malacca Strait. The U.S. is strengthening defense ties with Indonesia at a chokepoint through which nearly 80% of China’s oil and trade passes. This is a calculated move to gain strategic control over one of the most critical global trade routes. Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore are central to this corridor. While China has expanded its influence through investments and trade, the U.S. is countering it through defense partnerships and maritime presence. At the same time, tensions around the Strait of Hormuz have exposed how vulnerable global supply chains are. China has already warned against any disruption to its vessels, showing how critical these routes are for its economy. This is a larger U.S.–China power play where control over key chokepoints like Malacca can shape the future of global geopolitics.

While the world is watching the Strait of Hormuz, the real power game is shifting to the Malacca Strait. The U.S. is strengthening defense ties with Indonesia at a chokepoint through which nearly 80% of China’s oil and trade passes. This is a calculated move to gain strategic control over one of the most critical global trade routes. Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore are central to this corridor. While China has expanded its influence through investments and trade, the U.S. is countering it through defense partnerships and maritime presence. At the same time, tensions around the Strait of Hormuz have exposed how vulnerable global supply chains are. China has already warned against any disruption to its vessels, showing how critical these routes are for its economy. This is a larger U.S.–China power play where control over key chokepoints like Malacca can shape the future of global geopolitics.

Praffulgarg

21,035 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 CHINA BUILDS WHILE AMERICA BURNS BILLIONS 🚨 Marco Rubio says America does not want to contain China, but China should not rise at America’s expense. However, who is actually draining America? While China builds infrastructure, expands manufacturing, and signs business deals across the world, Washington is spending $1 billion a day on war in Iran and maintaining hundreds of military bases across the globe. That money is not being spent for the American people. It is being burned in West Asia to weaken Iran, control the Strait of Hormuz, and secure Israel’s dream of becoming the dominant empire of the region. American taxpayers are being sucked dry while China invests in its future. So maybe the problem is not that China is rising. Maybe the problem is that the United States chose empire over its own people.

🚨 CHINA BUILDS WHILE AMERICA BURNS BILLIONS 🚨 Marco Rubio says America does not want to contain China, but China should not rise at America’s expense. However, who is actually draining America? While China builds infrastructure, expands manufacturing, and signs business deals across the world, Washington is spending $1 billion a day on war in Iran and maintaining hundreds of military bases across the globe. That money is not being spent for the American people. It is being burned in West Asia to weaken Iran, control the Strait of Hormuz, and secure Israel’s dream of becoming the dominant empire of the region. American taxpayers are being sucked dry while China invests in its future. So maybe the problem is not that China is rising. Maybe the problem is that the United States chose empire over its own people.

Kevork Almassian

30,931 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

As President Trump heads to Beijing, a professor at China Foreign Affairs University — the cradle of China’s diplomats — said: “Everyone generally perceives that the US is indeed in decline — its influence is no longer what it once was. By contrast, China’s ability to shape international affairs and the evolution of the global situation is growing stronger, and its leadership on various issues in Sino-U.S. interactions is also increasing… We can clearly see the competitive dynamic in which Sino-U.S. power and influence are shifting — one rising as the other falls.” Textbook elite overconfidence. A perfect footnote to my NYT essay

As President Trump heads to Beijing, a professor at China Foreign Affairs University — the cradle of China’s diplomats — said: “Everyone generally perceives that the US is indeed in decline — its influence is no longer what it once was. By contrast, China’s ability to shape international affairs and the evolution of the global situation is growing stronger, and its leadership on various issues in Sino-U.S. interactions is also increasing… We can clearly see the competitive dynamic in which Sino-U.S. power and influence are shifting — one rising as the other falls.” Textbook elite overconfidence. A perfect footnote to my NYT essay

Yanzhong Huang

14,915 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 CHINA’S CALCULATED MOVE A massive shift is occurring: Larry Johnson argues that China sees no future with a failing West and is pivoting toward the Global South. With total control over the energy needed for the AI revolution, China doesn't need a kinetic war to win. As the West exhausts itself in Iran, Beijing is watching the U.S. military reach its limits.

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 CHINA’S CALCULATED MOVE A massive shift is occurring: Larry Johnson argues that China sees no future with a failing West and is pivoting toward the Global South. With total control over the energy needed for the AI revolution, China doesn't need a kinetic war to win. As the West exhausts itself in Iran, Beijing is watching the U.S. military reach its limits.

Mario Nawfal

87,371 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"I think a lot of us who served as foreign ambassadors in China, leave with a very different view than when we arrive. I did arrive skeptical of Chinese power and Chinese intentions... this is a Chinese government that says it wants a stable relationship with the U.S. and other countries but its aggressiveness is something to see." Nicholas Burns tells me "the mantra from Xi Jinping personally is: the East is rising and the West is falling."

"I think a lot of us who served as foreign ambassadors in China, leave with a very different view than when we arrive. I did arrive skeptical of Chinese power and Chinese intentions... this is a Chinese government that says it wants a stable relationship with the U.S. and other countries but its aggressiveness is something to see." Nicholas Burns tells me "the mantra from Xi Jinping personally is: the East is rising and the West is falling."

Christiane Amanpour

45,491 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

LANDMARK US-UK RESEARCH SAYS CHINA IS NOT TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD Top scholars in the US and the UK just published a landmark discovery: China is NOT trying to take over the world. In perhaps the most important geopolitics paper I've seen this year, the journal of International Security features a paper in which extensive research examined data from 12,000 Chinese articles and speeches and came to an astonishing conclusion: China has NO plan to replace the US as self-appointed leader of the world. It also has NO plan to force anyone else to copy its system of governance, unlike the west. This is terrible news for Apple Daily’s Mark Clifford (a Gordon Chang clone) – who wrote a whole book saying that China was actively working to remodel the whole world in its image. (China doesn't even insist on its model of governance in its country -- the place is full of special economic zones experimenting with other ways of governances.) . NOT A MILITARY THREAT Also important: the newly published International security paper says that China is NOT a military threat. “China does not pose the type of military threat that the conventional wisdom claims it does," the researchers say. "Thus, a hostile U.S. military posture in the Pacific is unwise and may unnecessarily create tensions.” . CHINA LOOKS INWARD In fact, this paper says almost exactly what this commentator and many others have been saying, literally, for years, in almost the same words. China does NOT have the western insistence on ruling the world – instead, it wants to maintain its borders and have positive relationships with other countries. “China's aims are unambiguous, enduring, and limited: It cares about its borders, sovereignty, and foreign economic relations,” the paper says. . COLBY IS WRONG China’s legal land area includes Hong Kong, Taiwan, Tibet, and Xinjiang, and it just wants to keep them. That’s all. The article quotes Elbridge Colby, now Deputy Secretary of Defense, envisioning China subjugating Taiwan and then picking out further targets to take over, including the Philippines and Vietnam. That is simply wrong, the researchers say. China has never made the slightest indication that it wants to take control of other countries. (And of course some newspapers reported that China wants to invade Australia!) . NOT PROPAGANDA This very lengthy paper in the journal of International Security is not, I repeat NOT, some sort of “pro-China propaganda”. The article is written by two US-based political scientists and one UK-based academic. The writers are in fact rather harsh about China, and recycle the endless trope implying that China is the world capital of human rights abuses (which it clearly isn't), and says that China is doing terrible things in the South China Sea – which is also not true. The writers do seem to have sucked up lots of the anti-China propaganda themselves. So that makes their work, which shows clearly that China is NOT a threat to the world, more valuable. I will provide the link for those who want to read further.

LANDMARK US-UK RESEARCH SAYS CHINA IS NOT TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD Top scholars in the US and the UK just published a landmark discovery: China is NOT trying to take over the world. In perhaps the most important geopolitics paper I've seen this year, the journal of International Security features a paper in which extensive research examined data from 12,000 Chinese articles and speeches and came to an astonishing conclusion: China has NO plan to replace the US as self-appointed leader of the world. It also has NO plan to force anyone else to copy its system of governance, unlike the west. This is terrible news for Apple Daily’s Mark Clifford (a Gordon Chang clone) – who wrote a whole book saying that China was actively working to remodel the whole world in its image. (China doesn't even insist on its model of governance in its country -- the place is full of special economic zones experimenting with other ways of governances.) . NOT A MILITARY THREAT Also important: the newly published International security paper says that China is NOT a military threat. “China does not pose the type of military threat that the conventional wisdom claims it does," the researchers say. "Thus, a hostile U.S. military posture in the Pacific is unwise and may unnecessarily create tensions.” . CHINA LOOKS INWARD In fact, this paper says almost exactly what this commentator and many others have been saying, literally, for years, in almost the same words. China does NOT have the western insistence on ruling the world – instead, it wants to maintain its borders and have positive relationships with other countries. “China's aims are unambiguous, enduring, and limited: It cares about its borders, sovereignty, and foreign economic relations,” the paper says. . COLBY IS WRONG China’s legal land area includes Hong Kong, Taiwan, Tibet, and Xinjiang, and it just wants to keep them. That’s all. The article quotes Elbridge Colby, now Deputy Secretary of Defense, envisioning China subjugating Taiwan and then picking out further targets to take over, including the Philippines and Vietnam. That is simply wrong, the researchers say. China has never made the slightest indication that it wants to take control of other countries. (And of course some newspapers reported that China wants to invade Australia!) . NOT PROPAGANDA This very lengthy paper in the journal of International Security is not, I repeat NOT, some sort of “pro-China propaganda”. The article is written by two US-based political scientists and one UK-based academic. The writers are in fact rather harsh about China, and recycle the endless trope implying that China is the world capital of human rights abuses (which it clearly isn't), and says that China is doing terrible things in the South China Sea – which is also not true. The writers do seem to have sucked up lots of the anti-China propaganda themselves. So that makes their work, which shows clearly that China is NOT a threat to the world, more valuable. I will provide the link for those who want to read further.

Nury Vittachi

28,217 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Everyone thinks giving Taiwan to China is a concession. It's not. Taiwan blocks China from the Pacific. That's its only strategic value to America. But if China owns Taiwan — Taiwan now blocks Japan and South Korea from the Strait of Malacca. Suddenly Japan and South Korea have to stop China from taking Taiwan. At their own expense. Their own military. Their own risk. Trump just transferred the Taiwan problem from America to its allies. And in return China opens its financial markets. 1.4 billion people finance American debt. Giving Taiwan to China is not a concession. It is the trade of the century.

Everyone thinks giving Taiwan to China is a concession. It's not. Taiwan blocks China from the Pacific. That's its only strategic value to America. But if China owns Taiwan — Taiwan now blocks Japan and South Korea from the Strait of Malacca. Suddenly Japan and South Korea have to stop China from taking Taiwan. At their own expense. Their own military. Their own risk. Trump just transferred the Taiwan problem from America to its allies. And in return China opens its financial markets. 1.4 billion people finance American debt. Giving Taiwan to China is not a concession. It is the trade of the century.

Predictive History

34,906 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Beijing rejects the West’s new “tribute system” lie. China stood at the height of world civilization for most of its long history. Yet it did not bomb half the world like the United States, a country with only 250 years of history and only 17 years without war. It did not colonize the entire Earth like the British Empire. China became the center of an Asian civilizational order — not a global machine of plunder. That is what the West still cannot understand. They look at China through their own jungle logic: If you are strong, you must dominate. If you rise, you must conquer. If others trade with you, they must be your “tribute system.” But no. Chinese civilization has always despised bullying the weak, worshiping power, and kneeling to foreigners. That is why Chinese people instinctively look down on self-colonized traitors, reverse nationalists, and postwar Japan — people who sold their spine and called the leash civilization. China’s moral line is very clear: What is ours, we will not give up an inch. What is not ours, we do not covet. That is why China defeated India and Vietnam, but did not occupy an extra inch beyond its own claims. Unlike Israel. Unlike Japan. Unlike America. Ask ordinary Chinese people whether China should invade another country, and 99% would reject it. Ask them whether China should defend itself from humiliation, invasion, and national collapse again, and 100% would rather pay the price. The West cannot imagine a powerful China that does not behave like the West. They look at China and see themselves. They fail to understand that China is a civilization masquerading as a nation. A civilization does not need to conquer or tame others. It commands its own gravity.

Beijing rejects the West’s new “tribute system” lie. China stood at the height of world civilization for most of its long history. Yet it did not bomb half the world like the United States, a country with only 250 years of history and only 17 years without war. It did not colonize the entire Earth like the British Empire. China became the center of an Asian civilizational order — not a global machine of plunder. That is what the West still cannot understand. They look at China through their own jungle logic: If you are strong, you must dominate. If you rise, you must conquer. If others trade with you, they must be your “tribute system.” But no. Chinese civilization has always despised bullying the weak, worshiping power, and kneeling to foreigners. That is why Chinese people instinctively look down on self-colonized traitors, reverse nationalists, and postwar Japan — people who sold their spine and called the leash civilization. China’s moral line is very clear: What is ours, we will not give up an inch. What is not ours, we do not covet. That is why China defeated India and Vietnam, but did not occupy an extra inch beyond its own claims. Unlike Israel. Unlike Japan. Unlike America. Ask ordinary Chinese people whether China should invade another country, and 99% would reject it. Ask them whether China should defend itself from humiliation, invasion, and national collapse again, and 100% would rather pay the price. The West cannot imagine a powerful China that does not behave like the West. They look at China and see themselves. They fail to understand that China is a civilization masquerading as a nation. A civilization does not need to conquer or tame others. It commands its own gravity.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

19,576 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

🇨🇳🇯🇵🇵🇭 China didn’t "send a message," it delivered a verdict. “The atrocities must be remembered. The blood debts must be repaid. The justice must be delivered for crimes.” This is no longer the anger of civilians, it is the cold, institutional memory of a nation that buried 35 million of its people under fascist steel. The Pacific War never truly ended. How could it? Fascist Japan never truly confessed. And every attempt to revive militarism isn’t a threat to China, it is Japan digging up the corpse of its own past. As for the Philippines: When a nation that was slaughtered, starved, and enslaved now bows to the descendants of the same fascist empire… that’s not “moving on.” That’s colonial trauma wearing a fresh flag. They say China’s diplomacy is “getting sharper.” No, China is simply done pretending that history is a metaphor, it is an invoice, and overdue debts get collected. Fascism is not “returning” to Asia. It never left Japan, and China is reminding the region why it will never rise again.

🇨🇳🇯🇵🇵🇭 China didn’t "send a message," it delivered a verdict. “The atrocities must be remembered. The blood debts must be repaid. The justice must be delivered for crimes.” This is no longer the anger of civilians, it is the cold, institutional memory of a nation that buried 35 million of its people under fascist steel. The Pacific War never truly ended. How could it? Fascist Japan never truly confessed. And every attempt to revive militarism isn’t a threat to China, it is Japan digging up the corpse of its own past. As for the Philippines: When a nation that was slaughtered, starved, and enslaved now bows to the descendants of the same fascist empire… that’s not “moving on.” That’s colonial trauma wearing a fresh flag. They say China’s diplomacy is “getting sharper.” No, China is simply done pretending that history is a metaphor, it is an invoice, and overdue debts get collected. Fascism is not “returning” to Asia. It never left Japan, and China is reminding the region why it will never rise again.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

76,662 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🇺🇸🇻🇪 "THE GREATEST THREAT TO FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION IS THE UNITED STATES - WE JUST SAW WHAT HAPPENED IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA" In this take, U.S. foreign influence is called out as excessive, hypocritical, and destabilizing, with a sharp contrast drawn between what the West says it defends and what it actually does on the global stage. "Russia’s use of soft, sharp, and other power in Ukraine was minimal before 2014. It wasn’t playing on the same level of interference as the U.S. and the West. Civil society is one thing, but when political groups in your country are funded by foreign governments, that’s not neutral influence. It’s funny Mr. Fink talks about ‘freedom of navigation’ as a Western value. We just saw the United States seize the oil tanker Skipper off the coast of Venezuela in the Caribbean Sea, a sanctioned vessel that Washington claims was tied to illicit oil networks U.S. client states have attacked neutral shipping in international waters in the Black Sea. The single greatest threat to maritime commerce today is the United States and its client states." Mark Sleboda

🇺🇸🇻🇪 "THE GREATEST THREAT TO FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION IS THE UNITED STATES - WE JUST SAW WHAT HAPPENED IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA" In this take, U.S. foreign influence is called out as excessive, hypocritical, and destabilizing, with a sharp contrast drawn between what the West says it defends and what it actually does on the global stage. "Russia’s use of soft, sharp, and other power in Ukraine was minimal before 2014. It wasn’t playing on the same level of interference as the U.S. and the West. Civil society is one thing, but when political groups in your country are funded by foreign governments, that’s not neutral influence. It’s funny Mr. Fink talks about ‘freedom of navigation’ as a Western value. We just saw the United States seize the oil tanker Skipper off the coast of Venezuela in the Caribbean Sea, a sanctioned vessel that Washington claims was tied to illicit oil networks U.S. client states have attacked neutral shipping in international waters in the Black Sea. The single greatest threat to maritime commerce today is the United States and its client states." Mark Sleboda

Mario Nawfal

34,829 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

40,493 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Xi Jinping is putting on a clinic: “The whole world is watching our meeting. The International situation is turbulent. The world is at a new crossroads: Can China and the US overcome the Thucydides Trap and create a new paradigm to meet global challenges together.” The Thucydides Trap is the structural tension that occurs when a rapidly rising power (China) threatens to displace an established ruling power that is in decline (US). By mentioning the Thucydides trap, Xi Jinping is signaling that China is the new leader of the free world and what’s remarkable is, unlike the U.S., China achieved this without dropping bombs, waging endless wars, or spending $1 trillion a year on its military. Instead China became the leader of the free world by investing in its people with housing, education, health care, and the best modern infrastructure in the world, and investing in its neighbor countries through its Belt and Road Initiative, which has funded ports, railways, and energy networks across the Global South. The US became a “superpower” through endless wars, corruption, and selling out its own people to the billionaire class while China became a superpower and surpassed the US by building trade and relations with the world and investing in its people instead of wars. Americans would be wise to take note and then change our corrupt government.

Xi Jinping is putting on a clinic: “The whole world is watching our meeting. The International situation is turbulent. The world is at a new crossroads: Can China and the US overcome the Thucydides Trap and create a new paradigm to meet global challenges together.” The Thucydides Trap is the structural tension that occurs when a rapidly rising power (China) threatens to displace an established ruling power that is in decline (US). By mentioning the Thucydides trap, Xi Jinping is signaling that China is the new leader of the free world and what’s remarkable is, unlike the U.S., China achieved this without dropping bombs, waging endless wars, or spending $1 trillion a year on its military. Instead China became the leader of the free world by investing in its people with housing, education, health care, and the best modern infrastructure in the world, and investing in its neighbor countries through its Belt and Road Initiative, which has funded ports, railways, and energy networks across the Global South. The US became a “superpower” through endless wars, corruption, and selling out its own people to the billionaire class while China became a superpower and surpassed the US by building trade and relations with the world and investing in its people instead of wars. Americans would be wise to take note and then change our corrupt government.

Power to the People ☭🕊

894,792 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🇨🇳 At the Shanghai Auto Show, China’s EV industry is thriving — yet Western media still frames it as a “response” to Tesla, as if China is eternally chasing. In reality, Chinese automakers surpassed Tesla years ago — and never looked back. Today, it’s the West that must “respond” to China. The real story? China’s EV dominance isn’t about stealing designs. It’s about vision, sacrifice, and ruthless competition: • Chinese firms knew they couldn’t beat legacy Western brands in gas cars. • So they bet early and hard on green energy, building the future from scratch. • Meanwhile, the West clung to their fading empires of oil and nostalgia. China didn’t “steal” a market or a technology. China created the future the West was too afraid to build. #ChinaEV #ShanghaiAutoShow #NewEnergy

🇨🇳 At the Shanghai Auto Show, China’s EV industry is thriving — yet Western media still frames it as a “response” to Tesla, as if China is eternally chasing. In reality, Chinese automakers surpassed Tesla years ago — and never looked back. Today, it’s the West that must “respond” to China. The real story? China’s EV dominance isn’t about stealing designs. It’s about vision, sacrifice, and ruthless competition: • Chinese firms knew they couldn’t beat legacy Western brands in gas cars. • So they bet early and hard on green energy, building the future from scratch. • Meanwhile, the West clung to their fading empires of oil and nostalgia. China didn’t “steal” a market or a technology. China created the future the West was too afraid to build. #ChinaEV #ShanghaiAutoShow #NewEnergy

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

27,399 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇨🇳🇨🇺🇺🇸 People forget this: while the U.S. builds “island chains” around China, China has never placed military pressure on the American homeland. But if Washington keeps threatening Cuba, maybe the world does need a Chinese military presence in Havana, not for aggression, but for protection. Because China’s connection with Cuba isn’t geopolitical theater. It is memory, it is gratitude, it is the quiet bond of two peoples who carried each other through the hardest decades of the 20th century. When that video of the 83-year-old Cuban man went viral in China, the former flight cadet who trained in Beijing in 1961, tens of millions of Chinese were moved. The Chinese Air Force even visited him in Havana. Not because of politics, but because history remembers kindness. So if the U.S. insists on treating Cuba as something it can threaten or “punish,” it shouldn’t be surprised when Cuba’s friends decide to stand between the bully and the bullied. After all, no one dictates what Cuba does. And China never abandons the people who once called it a brother.

🇨🇳🇨🇺🇺🇸 People forget this: while the U.S. builds “island chains” around China, China has never placed military pressure on the American homeland. But if Washington keeps threatening Cuba, maybe the world does need a Chinese military presence in Havana, not for aggression, but for protection. Because China’s connection with Cuba isn’t geopolitical theater. It is memory, it is gratitude, it is the quiet bond of two peoples who carried each other through the hardest decades of the 20th century. When that video of the 83-year-old Cuban man went viral in China, the former flight cadet who trained in Beijing in 1961, tens of millions of Chinese were moved. The Chinese Air Force even visited him in Havana. Not because of politics, but because history remembers kindness. So if the U.S. insists on treating Cuba as something it can threaten or “punish,” it shouldn’t be surprised when Cuba’s friends decide to stand between the bully and the bullied. After all, no one dictates what Cuba does. And China never abandons the people who once called it a brother.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

64,356 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Yatsenyuk convinces Europeans that World War III has already begun, and the enemies of the West are Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran. ‘Look broader. It is not only Russia that is waging war. This is an international conflict. China provides vital support to Russia. China supports this war. China is an accomplice in this war. China is a key partner of North Korea, which has sent its troops against Ukraine and is providing assistance in this war against Ukraine. China is an ally of Iran. China, Russia, and other outcasts represent totalitarian regimes that are fighting against democracy and the free world. That is the definition of this conflict. It is not just a war between Ukraine and Russia. It is something much bigger.’ - SK

Yatsenyuk convinces Europeans that World War III has already begun, and the enemies of the West are Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran. ‘Look broader. It is not only Russia that is waging war. This is an international conflict. China provides vital support to Russia. China supports this war. China is an accomplice in this war. China is a key partner of North Korea, which has sent its troops against Ukraine and is providing assistance in this war against Ukraine. China is an ally of Iran. China, Russia, and other outcasts represent totalitarian regimes that are fighting against democracy and the free world. That is the definition of this conflict. It is not just a war between Ukraine and Russia. It is something much bigger.’ - SK

Zlatti71

46,405 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

“I think the world must realize that China will not converge with Western norms, and it will find its own path to modernity,” Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said in a recent interview with the Financial Times, noting that China is a technological leader in many areas, in advanced manufacturing, in renewable energy, and the world has to contend with and accept the reality that China is not just a rising power, it is a risen power. China recently decided to forgo its special and differential treatment provisions in the WTO. In just this past year or so, it has doubled down on its support for global institutions. These are examples of how we have to embrace the reality that China will be a key player, and potentially a key leader, in this new global system, said Wong.

“I think the world must realize that China will not converge with Western norms, and it will find its own path to modernity,” Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said in a recent interview with the Financial Times, noting that China is a technological leader in many areas, in advanced manufacturing, in renewable energy, and the world has to contend with and accept the reality that China is not just a rising power, it is a risen power. China recently decided to forgo its special and differential treatment provisions in the WTO. In just this past year or so, it has doubled down on its support for global institutions. These are examples of how we have to embrace the reality that China will be a key player, and potentially a key leader, in this new global system, said Wong.

Global Times

123,625 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🇺🇸🇯🇵🇵🇭 A massive coalition of Western and allied powers is building an economic wall around China in Southeast Asia. What started with the U.S. and Japan has exploded, with Australia, Canada, South Korea, and five European nations joining the Luzon Economic Corridor to connect Subic, Clark, Manila, and Batangas. Ports, rail, semiconductors, and supply chains. On paper: development. In reality: a parallel logistics spine backed by ten global powers, designed to function completely independent of Beijing. China spent decades making itself impossible to bypass. The West and its allies are now spending billions to prove otherwise. The real question is whether the Philippines can stay committed as Chinese pressure in the South China Sea keeps rising. Source: IndoPacific_Report YT

🇺🇸🇯🇵🇵🇭 A massive coalition of Western and allied powers is building an economic wall around China in Southeast Asia. What started with the U.S. and Japan has exploded, with Australia, Canada, South Korea, and five European nations joining the Luzon Economic Corridor to connect Subic, Clark, Manila, and Batangas. Ports, rail, semiconductors, and supply chains. On paper: development. In reality: a parallel logistics spine backed by ten global powers, designed to function completely independent of Beijing. China spent decades making itself impossible to bypass. The West and its allies are now spending billions to prove otherwise. The real question is whether the Philippines can stay committed as Chinese pressure in the South China Sea keeps rising. Source: IndoPacific_Report YT

Mario Nawfal

39,786 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

China has been relatively restrained toward the Philippines because Manila is still an ASEAN member. But this is changing. The Philippines is no longer just making noise in the South China Sea. It is trying to manufacture territorial claims over Chinese waters, coordinate with external powers, and even work with Japan — a defeated fascist state that once slaughtered Asians and burned half the region — to pressure China over territory that does not belong to them. That crosses a line. The key phrase in this Chinese report is not just “illegal claims.” It is this: undermining the post-WWII international order. That is the real signal. China is no longer treating the Philippines as a small neighbor being manipulated by Washington. It is beginning to treat Manila as part of the same fascist militarism chain as Japan: using colonial-era arrangements, foreign backing, and legal theater to challenge the territorial order created after Japan’s defeat. The Philippines was shaped by Spanish and American colonial rule. Its boundaries were defined by treaties. None of those treaties gave it Huangyan Dao. None of them gave it China’s Nansha Islands. Proximity is not sovereignty. If proximity decided ownership, the world map would collapse overnight. So when Manila claims Chinese islands because they are “closer,” it is not defending international law. It is trying to rewrite it. And when it does so alongside Japan, the symbolism becomes even uglier: a former colony and a former fascist aggressor trying to divide the waters of a WWII victor. China’s patience is not weakness. Reports like this are not just academic documents. They are legal groundwork. And once Beijing starts framing your actions as a threat to the postwar international order, you are no longer just playing a media game. You are being placed in the same historical category as the countries that tried to overturn Asia by force. China is putting the Philippines in Fascist Japan’s historical shadow.

China has been relatively restrained toward the Philippines because Manila is still an ASEAN member. But this is changing. The Philippines is no longer just making noise in the South China Sea. It is trying to manufacture territorial claims over Chinese waters, coordinate with external powers, and even work with Japan — a defeated fascist state that once slaughtered Asians and burned half the region — to pressure China over territory that does not belong to them. That crosses a line. The key phrase in this Chinese report is not just “illegal claims.” It is this: undermining the post-WWII international order. That is the real signal. China is no longer treating the Philippines as a small neighbor being manipulated by Washington. It is beginning to treat Manila as part of the same fascist militarism chain as Japan: using colonial-era arrangements, foreign backing, and legal theater to challenge the territorial order created after Japan’s defeat. The Philippines was shaped by Spanish and American colonial rule. Its boundaries were defined by treaties. None of those treaties gave it Huangyan Dao. None of them gave it China’s Nansha Islands. Proximity is not sovereignty. If proximity decided ownership, the world map would collapse overnight. So when Manila claims Chinese islands because they are “closer,” it is not defending international law. It is trying to rewrite it. And when it does so alongside Japan, the symbolism becomes even uglier: a former colony and a former fascist aggressor trying to divide the waters of a WWII victor. China’s patience is not weakness. Reports like this are not just academic documents. They are legal groundwork. And once Beijing starts framing your actions as a threat to the postwar international order, you are no longer just playing a media game. You are being placed in the same historical category as the countries that tried to overturn Asia by force. China is putting the Philippines in Fascist Japan’s historical shadow.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

18,004 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen