Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🇨🇳🇨🇺🇺🇸 People forget this: while the U.S. builds “island chains” around China, China has never placed military pressure on the American homeland. But if Washington keeps threatening Cuba, maybe the world does need a Chinese military presence in Havana, not for aggression, but for protection. Because China’s connection with...

OopsGuess's profile picture

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

45,381 subscribers

64,356 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Don't be confused by the Tik Tokers who claim to speak on behalf of all Cubans. Cuba is in crisis. But not because of any “regime” imposed on the people from within. Cuba is in crisis because of the blockade imposed by the U.S., which tries to destroy the revolution and the spirit and commitment of the millions of Cuban people that remain in the country to defend it.
2:04

Don't be confused by the Tik Tokers who claim to speak on behalf of all Cubans. Cuba is in crisis. But not because of any “regime” imposed on the people from within. Cuba is in crisis because of the blockade imposed by the U.S., which tries to destroy the revolution and the spirit and commitment of the millions of Cuban people that remain in the country to defend it.

Party for Socialism and Liberation

15,540 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇨🇳🇨🇺 China Warns U.S. to Stop Threatening Cuba as Rubio Hints Military Action Is Coming RUBIO WANTS WAR IN CUBA Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun stated Thursday that Beijing FIRMLY supports Cuba's sovereignty and national dignity, and that Washington must stop using sanctions and judicial tools as weapons of coercion against Havana. The remarks came after the U.S. indicted 94-year-old former Cuban President Raul Castro. Secretary of State Rubio said Thursday that a negotiated outcome with Cuba is possible but "the likelihood of that happening, given who we're dealing with, right now is not high." Market data now puts the odds of a U.S. strike on Cuba by December 31 at 51%. Rubio WON'T REST till he takes out Cuba. It seems personal for him.
0:54

🇨🇳🇨🇺 China Warns U.S. to Stop Threatening Cuba as Rubio Hints Military Action Is Coming RUBIO WANTS WAR IN CUBA Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun stated Thursday that Beijing FIRMLY supports Cuba's sovereignty and national dignity, and that Washington must stop using sanctions and judicial tools as weapons of coercion against Havana. The remarks came after the U.S. indicted 94-year-old former Cuban President Raul Castro. Secretary of State Rubio said Thursday that a negotiated outcome with Cuba is possible but "the likelihood of that happening, given who we're dealing with, right now is not high." Market data now puts the odds of a U.S. strike on Cuba by December 31 at 51%. Rubio WON'T REST till he takes out Cuba. It seems personal for him.

Ryan Rozbiani

14,501 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇯🇵 Japan wanted Munich to be a stage; 🇨🇳 China made it a mirror. For decades Japan performed amnesia, but the moment its PM openly claimed a right to intervene in “Taiwan affairs,” history walked back into the room. Wang Yi didn’t escalate, he just diagnosed. A Fascist country that refuses to face its war crimes, but believes it can decide China’s sovereignty, is not seeking “stability,” it is rehearsing old ambitions in new language. And here is the part the West rarely understands: Japan should be grateful for the Chinese government’s restraint, and for how much anti-Japanese sentiment it has contained for decades. Japan mistakes its “politeness” and “obedience” for virtues that erase the past. They don’t. Westerners who never lived through Nanjing, who never saw Unit 731, who never heard the last cries of comfort women, cannot feel what 35 million Chinese deaths carved into our memory. But Chinese people know: beneath the romance of falling cherry blossoms is blood-soaked soil, and beneath the elegance of a kimono are the lice of a past Japan refuses to wash off. On Chinese social media, the mainstream view has been consistent for years: the historical reckoning with Japan is unfinished. And this time, it won’t be outsourced to America. It will be carried out by Chinese people themselves, a completing of the Pacific War that history never allowed China to finish, so these scars do not pass to the next generation. When China warns Japan today, it is not hostility. It is memory refusing to be buried.
2:52

🇯🇵 Japan wanted Munich to be a stage; 🇨🇳 China made it a mirror. For decades Japan performed amnesia, but the moment its PM openly claimed a right to intervene in “Taiwan affairs,” history walked back into the room. Wang Yi didn’t escalate, he just diagnosed. A Fascist country that refuses to face its war crimes, but believes it can decide China’s sovereignty, is not seeking “stability,” it is rehearsing old ambitions in new language. And here is the part the West rarely understands: Japan should be grateful for the Chinese government’s restraint, and for how much anti-Japanese sentiment it has contained for decades. Japan mistakes its “politeness” and “obedience” for virtues that erase the past. They don’t. Westerners who never lived through Nanjing, who never saw Unit 731, who never heard the last cries of comfort women, cannot feel what 35 million Chinese deaths carved into our memory. But Chinese people know: beneath the romance of falling cherry blossoms is blood-soaked soil, and beneath the elegance of a kimono are the lice of a past Japan refuses to wash off. On Chinese social media, the mainstream view has been consistent for years: the historical reckoning with Japan is unfinished. And this time, it won’t be outsourced to America. It will be carried out by Chinese people themselves, a completing of the Pacific War that history never allowed China to finish, so these scars do not pass to the next generation. When China warns Japan today, it is not hostility. It is memory refusing to be buried.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

85,739 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Cuba's President Díaz-Canel gets emotional: Cuba is not a terrorist country, nor is it a threat to the security of the United States. Cuba has never carried out, nor proposed, nor organized any aggressive action that puts at risk the territorial integrity, the security, or the stability of the government of the United States. We do not protect terrorists, and there are no military forces in Cuba from other nations or from other groups. In Cuba, there is indeed a military base—an illegal military base—and it is an illegal United States military base on Cuban soil, in the province of Guantánamo, against the will of the Cuban people.
1:22

Cuba's President Díaz-Canel gets emotional: Cuba is not a terrorist country, nor is it a threat to the security of the United States. Cuba has never carried out, nor proposed, nor organized any aggressive action that puts at risk the territorial integrity, the security, or the stability of the government of the United States. We do not protect terrorists, and there are no military forces in Cuba from other nations or from other groups. In Cuba, there is indeed a military base—an illegal military base—and it is an illegal United States military base on Cuban soil, in the province of Guantánamo, against the will of the Cuban people.

Clash Report

366,222 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🔹NBC: We saw people living in severe poverty in Havana. Is it time to take responsibility and change the Cuban system? Why not follow China or Vietnam which have embraced one-party rule while also embracing market economies? 🇨🇺 President Díaz-Canel: We study their models closely. But they were under sanctions for about a decade. Cuba has faced more than 60 years of blockade. That is the difference. They were able to develop once restrictions eased. Cuba has not had that opportunity. We are an island 90 miles from the United States, under constant pressure. When China and Vietnam began their development, they started from less favorable conditions than Cuba has today. So the real question is: lift the blockade and see what Cuba can do. If we have achieved this much under pressure, what could we achieve without it? If Cuba is truly weak, as some claim, then why has the United States spent decades trying to isolate and undermine it? Why not let it fail on its own? The answer is clear.
6:04

🔹NBC: We saw people living in severe poverty in Havana. Is it time to take responsibility and change the Cuban system? Why not follow China or Vietnam which have embraced one-party rule while also embracing market economies? 🇨🇺 President Díaz-Canel: We study their models closely. But they were under sanctions for about a decade. Cuba has faced more than 60 years of blockade. That is the difference. They were able to develop once restrictions eased. Cuba has not had that opportunity. We are an island 90 miles from the United States, under constant pressure. When China and Vietnam began their development, they started from less favorable conditions than Cuba has today. So the real question is: lift the blockade and see what Cuba can do. If we have achieved this much under pressure, what could we achieve without it? If Cuba is truly weak, as some claim, then why has the United States spent decades trying to isolate and undermine it? Why not let it fail on its own? The answer is clear.

Drop Site

136,709 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

China has made it clear that the Taiwan question is China’s internal affair. If Japan interferes, they will pay the price. China is not the weak one a century ago. Remember what this parade is called? The 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.
0:38

China has made it clear that the Taiwan question is China’s internal affair. If Japan interferes, they will pay the price. China is not the weak one a century ago. Remember what this parade is called? The 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.

Li Zexin 李泽欣

42,805 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

The Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., issued a statement ahead of President Trump's address stating that it has not interfered in elections. "China has all along adhered to the principle of non-interference in other's internal affairs," the statement read. "The U.S. election is an internal matter of the U.S. Its outcome is determined by the votes of the American people. China has never and will never interfere in the presidential elections of the U.S." Margaret Brennan has more.
2:17

The Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., issued a statement ahead of President Trump's address stating that it has not interfered in elections. "China has all along adhered to the principle of non-interference in other's internal affairs," the statement read. "The U.S. election is an internal matter of the U.S. Its outcome is determined by the votes of the American people. China has never and will never interfere in the presidential elections of the U.S." Margaret Brennan has more.

CBS News

267,774 просмотров • 28 дней назад

💥 Carl Zha Explains How China Would Really Fight the United States 💥 Carl Zha argues that people fundamentally misunderstand how China approaches confrontation with the United States because they keep imagining a Hollywood-style military showdown where Chinese fleets sail around the world to fight America symmetrically. But China’s real strength is not global military projection. Its real strength is economic power, industrial dominance, and control over supply chains the U.S. itself depends on. That is why, when Washington escalated the tariff war and sanctions campaign, Beijing responded not by trying to mirror American military behavior, but by targeting areas where the U.S. is structurally vulnerable. Rare earth exports. Industrial supply chains. Access to materials essential for the F-35, Patriot missiles, and large parts of the American military-industrial complex. For example, China openly instructed companies operating inside China not to comply with U.S. secondary sanctions targeting Iranian oil trade. In other words, Beijing signaled that American law does not possess automatic extraterritorial authority inside China anymore. That is a major shift in the global balance of economic power. Carl Zha says China does not need to defeat the United States by copying the American model of empire. It fights where it is strongest: production, industry, trade, and economic leverage. Because in a world still dependent on Chinese goods, Beijing understands that economic warfare may matter more than aircraft carriers. .Carl Zha .Syriana Analysis
4:21

💥 Carl Zha Explains How China Would Really Fight the United States 💥 Carl Zha argues that people fundamentally misunderstand how China approaches confrontation with the United States because they keep imagining a Hollywood-style military showdown where Chinese fleets sail around the world to fight America symmetrically. But China’s real strength is not global military projection. Its real strength is economic power, industrial dominance, and control over supply chains the U.S. itself depends on. That is why, when Washington escalated the tariff war and sanctions campaign, Beijing responded not by trying to mirror American military behavior, but by targeting areas where the U.S. is structurally vulnerable. Rare earth exports. Industrial supply chains. Access to materials essential for the F-35, Patriot missiles, and large parts of the American military-industrial complex. For example, China openly instructed companies operating inside China not to comply with U.S. secondary sanctions targeting Iranian oil trade. In other words, Beijing signaled that American law does not possess automatic extraterritorial authority inside China anymore. That is a major shift in the global balance of economic power. Carl Zha says China does not need to defeat the United States by copying the American model of empire. It fights where it is strongest: production, industry, trade, and economic leverage. Because in a world still dependent on Chinese goods, Beijing understands that economic warfare may matter more than aircraft carriers. .Carl Zha .Syriana Analysis

Kevork Almassian

37,107 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

An 82-year-old Cuban pilot went viral on Chinese social media after recounting his friendship with and studies in China during the 1960s and asking about the cost of a flight from Havana to Beijing to a Chinese tourist. Living in a cramped room with just one bed in Cuba, the 82-year-old is known as "Tito" on Chinese social media. When a Chinese female tourist walked by his door, he tried to converse with her despite her language barrier and initial shock. The girl later discovered that Tito was a Cuban pilot who studied aviation in Shanxi Province, China, from 1961 to 1963. Tito showed her his Chinese PLA graduation certificate and told her that he missed China and that most of his pilot friends had already died. After that, he asked how much a plane ticket from Havana to Beijing would cost. The girl later shared the video on Chinese social media, describing Tito as "the lonely grandfather in Cuba." She mentioned that Tito kept a little notebook in which he planned to jot down his inquiries for the Chinese and his wish lists for sites to visit in China. It appears that he had made repeated attempts to strike up conversations with Asian tourists who passed his door, but they all thought he was strange and quickly left. In Tito's notebook, you can still see Chinese expressions like "How are you?" "When will you leave?" and "When are you planning to return?" Tito's story has moved many Chinese internet users, who are rallying to help him get a plane ticket to China or locate his Chinese friends. In September 1961, the Cuban Air Force chose 223 young pilots (average age less than 20) to study in China. They were among the first international students to come to China, as the Chinese netizens learnt later. A Chinese netizen later claimed on social media that his grandfather was Tito's teacher at the time. The story of Tito has gone viral on Chinese social media. The official account of the Chinese PLA Air Force left a comment under Tito’s video, stating that they had been attempting to get in touch with Tito. The comment said that the Chinese PLA will never forget a friend like Tito and that their friendship will transcend space and time. Today is the Lantern Festival in China, a time for family reunions. The Chinese embassy in Cuba invited Tito and other Cuban pilots who had studied in China for their youth to attend the festival feast, where they reminisced and sang many Chinese songs together. The Chinese have an old proverb: "滴水之恩当涌泉相报" (A drop of water shall be returned with a burst of spring), being grateful is a virtue in Chinese culture; we always give back when someone helps us. The life and work of Canadian surgeon Norman Bethune is a topic included in Chinese school curricula; his heroic contributions to our cause during World War II are emphasized in our textbooks, and his legacy lives on in China. John Rabe, a German merchant who rescued some 250,000 Chinese people from the Nanjing Massacre, and his family are still very much loved and respected by the Chinese people. Thomas Rabe, a doctor at the medicinal Faculty of Heidelberg University in Heidelberg, southwest Germany, and grandson of John Rabe, sent a plea to the Chinese embassy in Germany in March 2020 for medicinal supplies to help his hospital battle the COVID-19 pandemic. In April 2020, with all of the necessary assistance and coordination, medical supplies given from various sources, including medicines, protective suits, and masks, arrived in Germany from China. Chinese embassy staff raced from Berlin to Heidelberg, a distance of 700 kilometers, to expedite the delivery of supplies to the Heidelberg administration, the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, and Dr. Thomas Rabe.
0:31

An 82-year-old Cuban pilot went viral on Chinese social media after recounting his friendship with and studies in China during the 1960s and asking about the cost of a flight from Havana to Beijing to a Chinese tourist. Living in a cramped room with just one bed in Cuba, the 82-year-old is known as "Tito" on Chinese social media. When a Chinese female tourist walked by his door, he tried to converse with her despite her language barrier and initial shock. The girl later discovered that Tito was a Cuban pilot who studied aviation in Shanxi Province, China, from 1961 to 1963. Tito showed her his Chinese PLA graduation certificate and told her that he missed China and that most of his pilot friends had already died. After that, he asked how much a plane ticket from Havana to Beijing would cost. The girl later shared the video on Chinese social media, describing Tito as "the lonely grandfather in Cuba." She mentioned that Tito kept a little notebook in which he planned to jot down his inquiries for the Chinese and his wish lists for sites to visit in China. It appears that he had made repeated attempts to strike up conversations with Asian tourists who passed his door, but they all thought he was strange and quickly left. In Tito's notebook, you can still see Chinese expressions like "How are you?" "When will you leave?" and "When are you planning to return?" Tito's story has moved many Chinese internet users, who are rallying to help him get a plane ticket to China or locate his Chinese friends. In September 1961, the Cuban Air Force chose 223 young pilots (average age less than 20) to study in China. They were among the first international students to come to China, as the Chinese netizens learnt later. A Chinese netizen later claimed on social media that his grandfather was Tito's teacher at the time. The story of Tito has gone viral on Chinese social media. The official account of the Chinese PLA Air Force left a comment under Tito’s video, stating that they had been attempting to get in touch with Tito. The comment said that the Chinese PLA will never forget a friend like Tito and that their friendship will transcend space and time. Today is the Lantern Festival in China, a time for family reunions. The Chinese embassy in Cuba invited Tito and other Cuban pilots who had studied in China for their youth to attend the festival feast, where they reminisced and sang many Chinese songs together. The Chinese have an old proverb: "滴水之恩当涌泉相报" (A drop of water shall be returned with a burst of spring), being grateful is a virtue in Chinese culture; we always give back when someone helps us. The life and work of Canadian surgeon Norman Bethune is a topic included in Chinese school curricula; his heroic contributions to our cause during World War II are emphasized in our textbooks, and his legacy lives on in China. John Rabe, a German merchant who rescued some 250,000 Chinese people from the Nanjing Massacre, and his family are still very much loved and respected by the Chinese people. Thomas Rabe, a doctor at the medicinal Faculty of Heidelberg University in Heidelberg, southwest Germany, and grandson of John Rabe, sent a plea to the Chinese embassy in Germany in March 2020 for medicinal supplies to help his hospital battle the COVID-19 pandemic. In April 2020, with all of the necessary assistance and coordination, medical supplies given from various sources, including medicines, protective suits, and masks, arrived in Germany from China. Chinese embassy staff raced from Berlin to Heidelberg, a distance of 700 kilometers, to expedite the delivery of supplies to the Heidelberg administration, the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, and Dr. Thomas Rabe.

Eivor

252,231 просмотров • 1 год назад

China is not what you think it is. China was created by America. In 1971 Nixon removed the dollar from the gold standard. The dollar was now worth nothing. So he needed to create demand for it. Two new hallucinations. The petrodollar — oil only sold in US dollars. And China — the world's factory, paid in US dollars. China didn't rise because of communism. China didn't rise because of hard work. China rose because America needed somewhere to park its dollars. China is a hallucination of a hallucination. And here is the problem with that. If the original hallucination becomes unstable — China becomes twice as unstable. Because it has nothing real to stand on. That is why China and America will always need each other. The dream only works if both keep dreaming it.
2:32

China is not what you think it is. China was created by America. In 1971 Nixon removed the dollar from the gold standard. The dollar was now worth nothing. So he needed to create demand for it. Two new hallucinations. The petrodollar — oil only sold in US dollars. And China — the world's factory, paid in US dollars. China didn't rise because of communism. China didn't rise because of hard work. China rose because America needed somewhere to park its dollars. China is a hallucination of a hallucination. And here is the problem with that. If the original hallucination becomes unstable — China becomes twice as unstable. Because it has nothing real to stand on. That is why China and America will always need each other. The dream only works if both keep dreaming it.

Predictive History

24,046 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨Is Cuba🇨🇺 prepared for a US🇺🇸 ATTACK? Afshin Rattansi: ‘Why does Cuba today talk about it as if the United States has ever respected international law with respect to Cuba? What’s the point of that?’ Cuba’s Ambassador to the UN: ‘Fidel Castro always said that the best way to win a war is to prevent it, and the best way to prevent the war is to be ready for it. So we have been working in both things. First of all, we are working in the international arena.’ Afshin Rattansi: ‘No, Cuba has been working on tourism, arguably. Cuba has been working on tourism and reducing the resilience against a US invasion, surely. Is Cuba prepared today against Trump’s warships?’ Cuba’s UN Amb.Ernesto Soberón: ‘Cuba is ready for all the scenarios. Cuba has been working for its development and has been working to avoid any kind of aggression... Every week we have a day to prepare for the defence also in Cuba. So we are not working in just one direction.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇
2:24

🚨Is Cuba🇨🇺 prepared for a US🇺🇸 ATTACK? Afshin Rattansi: ‘Why does Cuba today talk about it as if the United States has ever respected international law with respect to Cuba? What’s the point of that?’ Cuba’s Ambassador to the UN: ‘Fidel Castro always said that the best way to win a war is to prevent it, and the best way to prevent the war is to be ready for it. So we have been working in both things. First of all, we are working in the international arena.’ Afshin Rattansi: ‘No, Cuba has been working on tourism, arguably. Cuba has been working on tourism and reducing the resilience against a US invasion, surely. Is Cuba prepared today against Trump’s warships?’ Cuba’s UN Amb.Ernesto Soberón: ‘Cuba is ready for all the scenarios. Cuba has been working for its development and has been working to avoid any kind of aggression... Every week we have a day to prepare for the defence also in Cuba. So we are not working in just one direction.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

11,199 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

China’s warning about Japan’s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japan’s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the world’s second-largest economy. China’s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match China’s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japan’s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to “move on” from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a “peaceful country” after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beast’s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japan’s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it “defense.” They call it “counterstrike capability.” They call it “normalization.” But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese “bullying,” and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the “Indo-Pacific” containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become “higher-class Asians” under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.
1:45

China’s warning about Japan’s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japan’s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the world’s second-largest economy. China’s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match China’s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japan’s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to “move on” from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a “peaceful country” after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beast’s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japan’s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it “defense.” They call it “counterstrike capability.” They call it “normalization.” But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese “bullying,” and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the “Indo-Pacific” containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become “higher-class Asians” under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

29,202 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Japan and the Philippines can hold all the “maritime delimitation talks” they want. China has already made it clear: the area is east of China’s Taiwan island, and any so-called delimitation that violates China’s maritime rights is illegal, null, and void. A joint statement between two U.S. client states does not erase Chinese sovereignty. It does not create maritime power. It does not rewrite geography. It does not make China disappear. Geopolitics is not cosplay. If you do not have the legal standing, the military power, or the strategic weight to touch China’s waters, then your little map-drawing ceremony is just self-deception with microphones.
1:05

Japan and the Philippines can hold all the “maritime delimitation talks” they want. China has already made it clear: the area is east of China’s Taiwan island, and any so-called delimitation that violates China’s maritime rights is illegal, null, and void. A joint statement between two U.S. client states does not erase Chinese sovereignty. It does not create maritime power. It does not rewrite geography. It does not make China disappear. Geopolitics is not cosplay. If you do not have the legal standing, the military power, or the strategic weight to touch China’s waters, then your little map-drawing ceremony is just self-deception with microphones.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

41,786 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇨🇳 Trump closes the Beijing state banquet with a toast to U.S.-China ties. "I'd like to raise a glass to the rich and enduring ties between the American and Chinese people. It's a very special relationship." The man who started a trade war with China just called it a "very special relationship" over dinner in Beijing. The arc is something.
0:24

🇺🇸🇨🇳 Trump closes the Beijing state banquet with a toast to U.S.-China ties. "I'd like to raise a glass to the rich and enduring ties between the American and Chinese people. It's a very special relationship." The man who started a trade war with China just called it a "very special relationship" over dinner in Beijing. The arc is something.

Mario Nawfal

259,585 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I visited Beijing and had the pleasure of interviewing Li Jingjing 李菁菁 at one of China's most popular tourist spots. In our 28 minute vlog we discussed: -What is the Biggest Misconception About China? - Does China Have True Freedom? - Is China Safe for Women? - China’s Poverty Alleviation Program - Why Education is so Important in China - Is it Better to be Poor in China or USA? - What is the Future for Youth in China? - Why Chinese Are Confident About Their Future? - Why Chinese Students Return Home to China? - Does China Want to Spread Communism? - Why Countries Love Doing Business with China? - What Do Chinese People Think of Trump? - Are Chinese People Scared of the Tariff War? This interview will change EVERYTHING You Know About China. Here is the preview, go to my YouTube channel for the full video (link in bio)
28:21

I visited Beijing and had the pleasure of interviewing Li Jingjing 李菁菁 at one of China's most popular tourist spots. In our 28 minute vlog we discussed: -What is the Biggest Misconception About China? - Does China Have True Freedom? - Is China Safe for Women? - China’s Poverty Alleviation Program - Why Education is so Important in China - Is it Better to be Poor in China or USA? - What is the Future for Youth in China? - Why Chinese Are Confident About Their Future? - Why Chinese Students Return Home to China? - Does China Want to Spread Communism? - Why Countries Love Doing Business with China? - What Do Chinese People Think of Trump? - Are Chinese People Scared of the Tariff War? This interview will change EVERYTHING You Know About China. Here is the preview, go to my YouTube channel for the full video (link in bio)

Cyrus Janssen

41,212 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Rubio’s entire statement can be translated into one paragraph: America preached free markets when it was winning. Now that China is succeeding under the rules Washington claimed to worship, competition becomes “Chinese aggression,” industrial policy becomes “cheating,” and American decline becomes someone else’s crime. China never showed much interest in becoming the world’s policeman. It would much rather let the United States stand in front, absorb the anger, finance the wars, patrol the oceans, and exhaust itself—while China develops, trades, builds, and moves forward. Washington’s real problem is not that China wants to replace it. It is that America cannot tolerate any country becoming strong enough to ignore its permission. The Soviet Union. Germany. Japan. The European Union. Whenever another power rises, American paranoia activates. It does not compete. It sanctions. Blocks. Threatens. Cuts access. Weaponizes finance. Then calls the damage “defending the rules-based order.” But China is the opponent Washington was never psychologically prepared for. The more it is contained, the more it substitutes. The more it is sanctioned, the more it builds. The more it is denied, the more it learns to live without America. The United States has no memory of rebuilding from national ruin. China does. That is why Washington experiences setbacks as humiliation, while China experiences them as instructions. And Rubio’s Taiwan remarks expose the fraud behind Washington’s language of “stability.” The United States says it opposes any change to the status quo—not because the status quo is sacred, but because permanent division serves American power. China is expected to tolerate separatism, foreign arms, political interference, and an island turned into a strategic pressure point indefinitely. Washington calls that “peace.” But any attempt by China to end the arrangement becomes “coercion.” So Rubio’s message is simple: We lost the free-market competition we claimed to believe in. China kept advancing despite our attempts to stop it. Direct confrontation is becoming too dangerous. But we still intend to preserve every geopolitical advantage created by Chinese division. America is not asking for stability because it has accepted China. It is asking for a strategic pause while keeping Taiwan frozen as leverage. Containment failed. The appetite for containment did not.
3:52

Rubio’s entire statement can be translated into one paragraph: America preached free markets when it was winning. Now that China is succeeding under the rules Washington claimed to worship, competition becomes “Chinese aggression,” industrial policy becomes “cheating,” and American decline becomes someone else’s crime. China never showed much interest in becoming the world’s policeman. It would much rather let the United States stand in front, absorb the anger, finance the wars, patrol the oceans, and exhaust itself—while China develops, trades, builds, and moves forward. Washington’s real problem is not that China wants to replace it. It is that America cannot tolerate any country becoming strong enough to ignore its permission. The Soviet Union. Germany. Japan. The European Union. Whenever another power rises, American paranoia activates. It does not compete. It sanctions. Blocks. Threatens. Cuts access. Weaponizes finance. Then calls the damage “defending the rules-based order.” But China is the opponent Washington was never psychologically prepared for. The more it is contained, the more it substitutes. The more it is sanctioned, the more it builds. The more it is denied, the more it learns to live without America. The United States has no memory of rebuilding from national ruin. China does. That is why Washington experiences setbacks as humiliation, while China experiences them as instructions. And Rubio’s Taiwan remarks expose the fraud behind Washington’s language of “stability.” The United States says it opposes any change to the status quo—not because the status quo is sacred, but because permanent division serves American power. China is expected to tolerate separatism, foreign arms, political interference, and an island turned into a strategic pressure point indefinitely. Washington calls that “peace.” But any attempt by China to end the arrangement becomes “coercion.” So Rubio’s message is simple: We lost the free-market competition we claimed to believe in. China kept advancing despite our attempts to stop it. Direct confrontation is becoming too dangerous. But we still intend to preserve every geopolitical advantage created by Chinese division. America is not asking for stability because it has accepted China. It is asking for a strategic pause while keeping Taiwan frozen as leverage. Containment failed. The appetite for containment did not.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

36,165 просмотров • 11 дней назад

The Cuban people are not all of a sudden suffering because of Trump. The Cuban people have been suffering for decades because of communism. They didn't all of a sudden start starving, they've been starving for decades. Their infrastructure didn't all of a sudden start collapsing, it's been collapsing for decades. To everyone who thinks Cuba is in the condition it's in because of some embargo or blockade, It's not, it is because of COMMUNISM!!! And to anyone who is about to say something stupid like "you can't define communism"... I'll give you the real definition and not the one your Marxist professor gave you... Communism: a totalitarian system of governance disguised as an economic plan. CUBA LIBRE!!! 🇨🇺🤝🇺🇸
0:20

The Cuban people are not all of a sudden suffering because of Trump. The Cuban people have been suffering for decades because of communism. They didn't all of a sudden start starving, they've been starving for decades. Their infrastructure didn't all of a sudden start collapsing, it's been collapsing for decades. To everyone who thinks Cuba is in the condition it's in because of some embargo or blockade, It's not, it is because of COMMUNISM!!! And to anyone who is about to say something stupid like "you can't define communism"... I'll give you the real definition and not the one your Marxist professor gave you... Communism: a totalitarian system of governance disguised as an economic plan. CUBA LIBRE!!! 🇨🇺🤝🇺🇸

The Hole

56,751 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Did Cuba Just Surrender to the United States? The Anti-American Bloc Is Crumbling — Cuba May Be Next. For the first time in decades, Cuba has openly acknowledged negotiations with the United States. On March 13, Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel confirmed that talks between Havana and Washington are underway. Is this simply diplomacy or a sign that the Cuban regime is running out of options? In this video, I explain why Cuba’s economic crisis, the collapse of Venezuelan support, and major geopolitical shifts may be forcing Havana to reconsider its confrontation with the United States after more than 60 years.
16:23

Did Cuba Just Surrender to the United States? The Anti-American Bloc Is Crumbling — Cuba May Be Next. For the first time in decades, Cuba has openly acknowledged negotiations with the United States. On March 13, Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel confirmed that talks between Havana and Washington are underway. Is this simply diplomacy or a sign that the Cuban regime is running out of options? In this video, I explain why Cuba’s economic crisis, the collapse of Venezuelan support, and major geopolitical shifts may be forcing Havana to reconsider its confrontation with the United States after more than 60 years.

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

10,928 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад