Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Australia's new “Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill” is perhaps the most egregious attack on free speech I've ever seen. The Australian government is trying to punish all speech that could theoretically "cause fear," even if no actual harm ever occurred by locking you up for 5+ years in... prison. They're going after your tweets, blogs, memes, and even quoting scripture as dangerously evil "hate speech," offering protections for Muslims and Jews to speak their mind, but not Catholics or other Christians. PLUS - they want to ban certain groups from Australia carpe blanche, throwing you in prison for 15 YEARS for supporting them. Are Bible Verses & objective truth the next frontier of prison-worthy hate speech in Australia? 👇show more

Isabel Brown

106,426 subscribers

19,927 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

REPORT: Australia has just introduced what may be the most extreme hate speech law in Western history. The new 2026 “Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill” punishes speech that causes fear—even if no harm occurs—with up to 5 years in prison. It gets worse. The law applies to nearly everything: tweets, blogs, memes, even quoting scripture online. It explicitly states that it doesn’t matter if anyone actually felt hatred or fear. And it allows the government to go back in time and charge people for things they said before the law existed. The bill also gives police power to ban groups without due process—including groups outside Australia—and to imprison citizens for up to 15 years for “supporting” them. And while it claims to offer religious protections, a rep from the Attorney General’s Department confirmed that Catholics and Christians will not receive those protections—even as Jewish, Islamic, and Sikh Australians do. If you post a Bible verse today, what’s stopping them from calling it hate speech tomorrow? Don't miss ZeeeMediaOfficial's report:👇

REPORT: Australia has just introduced what may be the most extreme hate speech law in Western history. The new 2026 “Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill” punishes speech that causes fear—even if no harm occurs—with up to 5 years in prison. It gets worse. The law applies to nearly everything: tweets, blogs, memes, even quoting scripture online. It explicitly states that it doesn’t matter if anyone actually felt hatred or fear. And it allows the government to go back in time and charge people for things they said before the law existed. The bill also gives police power to ban groups without due process—including groups outside Australia—and to imprison citizens for up to 15 years for “supporting” them. And while it claims to offer religious protections, a rep from the Attorney General’s Department confirmed that Catholics and Christians will not receive those protections—even as Jewish, Islamic, and Sikh Australians do. If you post a Bible verse today, what’s stopping them from calling it hate speech tomorrow? Don't miss ZeeeMediaOfficial's report:👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

617,099 views • 6 months ago

James Fishback tells Fox Business that speech shouldn’t be regulated. “Hate speech is a made up construct by the left. And, if we concede to the left that hate speech exists, they're going to throw us in prison for saying there are only 2 genders, or God is real."

James Fishback tells Fox Business that speech shouldn’t be regulated. “Hate speech is a made up construct by the left. And, if we concede to the left that hate speech exists, they're going to throw us in prison for saying there are only 2 genders, or God is real."

Team Fishback

30,591 views • 6 months ago

Breaking News in 'Downtown Clowntown Australia'. Today, our government introduced the most draconian anti-free speech legislation the world has ever seen. The final draft was given to senators at 10 am on the SAME DAY they are expected to vote on it. These new laws will land people like me in prison for up to five years...pray for Australia

Breaking News in 'Downtown Clowntown Australia'. Today, our government introduced the most draconian anti-free speech legislation the world has ever seen. The final draft was given to senators at 10 am on the SAME DAY they are expected to vote on it. These new laws will land people like me in prison for up to five years...pray for Australia

Monica Smit / Reignite Democracy

23,443 views • 5 months ago

.Andrew Doyle: “If you look at all the various definitions of hate speech across European statute books, none of them agree. No one knows what it is really.” The concept of hate speech is being used to erode free speech across Europe, argues comedian and writer Andrew Doyle, author of “Free Speech and Why It Matters.” “No one can define hate speech. No one knows what it means. And [yes] human beings hate. That's an emotion that has developed in us over many, many years. You can't wish away a human emotion with the stroke of a pen. You may as well try and legislate against envy. It doesn't make sense,” he says. “People [are] trying to eliminate free speech or draw their own exceptions or carve out exceptions. That's why the First Amendment—even though it's a great protection—is not invulnerable to attack or modification or misinterpretation. All of that can still happen.” Free speech, he says, is never something that’s won, it’s something that needs to be fought for always.

.Andrew Doyle: “If you look at all the various definitions of hate speech across European statute books, none of them agree. No one knows what it is really.” The concept of hate speech is being used to erode free speech across Europe, argues comedian and writer Andrew Doyle, author of “Free Speech and Why It Matters.” “No one can define hate speech. No one knows what it means. And [yes] human beings hate. That's an emotion that has developed in us over many, many years. You can't wish away a human emotion with the stroke of a pen. You may as well try and legislate against envy. It doesn't make sense,” he says. “People [are] trying to eliminate free speech or draw their own exceptions or carve out exceptions. That's why the First Amendment—even though it's a great protection—is not invulnerable to attack or modification or misinterpretation. All of that can still happen.” Free speech, he says, is never something that’s won, it’s something that needs to be fought for always.

Jan Jekielek

43,084 views • 6 months ago

Freedom of speech is under rampant attack. The UK is locking up its own citizens for “hate speech”, Pavel Durov has been arrested and X has been banned in Brazil. But did you know there’s already a law in place that would allow the globalists to ban X in the EU as well? Let me tell you about the DSA. 👇🏻

Freedom of speech is under rampant attack. The UK is locking up its own citizens for “hate speech”, Pavel Durov has been arrested and X has been banned in Brazil. But did you know there’s already a law in place that would allow the globalists to ban X in the EU as well? Let me tell you about the DSA. 👇🏻

Eva Vlaardingerbroek

1,173,905 views • 1 year ago

The Albanese Labor Government's introduction of new misinformation and disinformation legislation is just a renewed attack on freedom of speech in Australia. This terrible bill will be strongly opposed by One Nation Australia! Labor has never understood freedom of speech or how it works, and people always fear what they don’t understand. That’s why Labor wants to shut down freedom of speech. That’s why Labor wants to give itself the power to decide what is misinformation and disinformation, and use this power to silence honest debate and honest criticism. Labor is appalled at the very notion that Australians still have the right to say things that Labor doesn’t agree with. Labor doesn’t trust the Australian people to sort out truth from fiction for themselves. With this bill, Labor shows its contempt for the intelligence of the Australian people. Labor will use this power to silence dissent. If you speak the truth that gender ideology is contrived nonsense, or that climate change is a scam, or that COVID-19 vaccines are harmful – Labor will have the power to silence you. This bill is all the evidence this country needs to have a good, hard look at enshrining the right to free speech in the Constitution. One Nation tried to move an inquiry to kick start this process. Labor opposed it along with those other staunch opponents of free speech in Australia, the Greens. When are Australians going to wake up and understand these parties for what they are? They despise democracy and the principles which underpin its foundations. There is no democracy in Australia without freedom of speech, its most important principle. One Nation will always fight to protect true freedom of speech in our continual efforts to defend Australian democracy.

The Albanese Labor Government's introduction of new misinformation and disinformation legislation is just a renewed attack on freedom of speech in Australia. This terrible bill will be strongly opposed by One Nation Australia! Labor has never understood freedom of speech or how it works, and people always fear what they don’t understand. That’s why Labor wants to shut down freedom of speech. That’s why Labor wants to give itself the power to decide what is misinformation and disinformation, and use this power to silence honest debate and honest criticism. Labor is appalled at the very notion that Australians still have the right to say things that Labor doesn’t agree with. Labor doesn’t trust the Australian people to sort out truth from fiction for themselves. With this bill, Labor shows its contempt for the intelligence of the Australian people. Labor will use this power to silence dissent. If you speak the truth that gender ideology is contrived nonsense, or that climate change is a scam, or that COVID-19 vaccines are harmful – Labor will have the power to silence you. This bill is all the evidence this country needs to have a good, hard look at enshrining the right to free speech in the Constitution. One Nation tried to move an inquiry to kick start this process. Labor opposed it along with those other staunch opponents of free speech in Australia, the Greens. When are Australians going to wake up and understand these parties for what they are? They despise democracy and the principles which underpin its foundations. There is no democracy in Australia without freedom of speech, its most important principle. One Nation will always fight to protect true freedom of speech in our continual efforts to defend Australian democracy.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

112,686 views • 1 year ago

The Irish government wants to pass a law that could see you or your loved ones jailed for possession of memes, cartoons or any content that could be deemed "hateful". The Bill includes no definition of hate and is wide open to abuse by bad actors. Defend free speech – say no to this legislation. Sign the petition: #BinTheBill

The Irish government wants to pass a law that could see you or your loved ones jailed for possession of memes, cartoons or any content that could be deemed "hateful". The Bill includes no definition of hate and is wide open to abuse by bad actors. Defend free speech – say no to this legislation. Sign the petition: #BinTheBill

Free Speech Ireland

19,582,155 views • 2 years ago

Every person in America should be required to watch this “Punishment for entering a country illegally” - Russia, 2 years in a labor camp - India, 8 years in prison - Australia, up to 5 years in prison and mandatory detention before deportation - Australia, you can't even move there if you want to move there legally without proving your worth - Mexico, up to 2 years in prison for first-time illegal entry But USA, of course, congrats. You get free housing, free health care, free food and free cash. Deportation is not racist. It's called actions meet consequences, something that is foreign to so many Americans these days. It's so normal everywhere else. And yet here, we, we hate the idea that there is punishment associated with a crime. It is truly phenomenal to watch so many minds be molded and transformed into believing that this is a bad thing, even though, again, all the other countries, it's totally normal”

Every person in America should be required to watch this “Punishment for entering a country illegally” - Russia, 2 years in a labor camp - India, 8 years in prison - Australia, up to 5 years in prison and mandatory detention before deportation - Australia, you can't even move there if you want to move there legally without proving your worth - Mexico, up to 2 years in prison for first-time illegal entry But USA, of course, congrats. You get free housing, free health care, free food and free cash. Deportation is not racist. It's called actions meet consequences, something that is foreign to so many Americans these days. It's so normal everywhere else. And yet here, we, we hate the idea that there is punishment associated with a crime. It is truly phenomenal to watch so many minds be molded and transformed into believing that this is a bad thing, even though, again, all the other countries, it's totally normal”

Wall Street Apes

269,563 views • 5 months ago

🚨VIRAL STORY: Explosive New Angle of Men Confronting Muslims with BACON at USF – Now Facing FELONY Hate Crime Charges and Years in Prison ⚠️ Freshly posted video from their perspective has surfaced, showing the guys going up to the Muslims (some students apparently) in a public parking area, waving bacon around: “Bacon? It’s REALLY good! Anybody? You can eat bacon whenever you want!” Two arrested: Slapped with third-degree FELONIES for “disturbing a religious gathering” with hate enhancements. Up to 5 YEARS each! This footage reveals what really happened. Free speech or hate crime? Share and comment below!

🚨VIRAL STORY: Explosive New Angle of Men Confronting Muslims with BACON at USF – Now Facing FELONY Hate Crime Charges and Years in Prison ⚠️ Freshly posted video from their perspective has surfaced, showing the guys going up to the Muslims (some students apparently) in a public parking area, waving bacon around: “Bacon? It’s REALLY good! Anybody? You can eat bacon whenever you want!” Two arrested: Slapped with third-degree FELONIES for “disturbing a religious gathering” with hate enhancements. Up to 5 YEARS each! This footage reveals what really happened. Free speech or hate crime? Share and comment below!

The AI Robot Guy on X

172,020 views • 7 months ago

When the Government says it is banning something to ‘protect’ people, more often than not it is not about safety but about clamping down on free speech. FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw was on Talk to discuss the Government’s new draft Bill to ban conversion practices and the chilling effect it could have on free speech — particularly on conversations between parents and gender-confused children. You can easily imagine a situation in which a vulnerable child, having been radicalised into believing their parents are evil for not affirming their gender identity, reports them to the police. Even the threat of being reported could deter parents from having well-intentioned conversations with their children for fear of prosecution. Under the draft Bill, they could face a maximum sentence of five years in prison. Watch Connie’s interview below and sign the FSU’s petition 👇

When the Government says it is banning something to ‘protect’ people, more often than not it is not about safety but about clamping down on free speech. FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw was on Talk to discuss the Government’s new draft Bill to ban conversion practices and the chilling effect it could have on free speech — particularly on conversations between parents and gender-confused children. You can easily imagine a situation in which a vulnerable child, having been radicalised into believing their parents are evil for not affirming their gender identity, reports them to the police. Even the threat of being reported could deter parents from having well-intentioned conversations with their children for fear of prosecution. Under the draft Bill, they could face a maximum sentence of five years in prison. Watch Connie’s interview below and sign the FSU’s petition 👇

The Free Speech Union

12,471 views • 13 days ago

DISTURBING: Charlie Kirk’s assassination is already being weaponized to justify a crackdown on free speech. What began as outrage over vile online celebrations of his death is now morphing into government demands to police “hate speech.” Rep. Clay Higgins has called for lifetime bans from social media and even revoking driver’s licenses for those who mocked Kirk’s murder. Attorney General Pam Bondi went further, vowing to target Americans for “hate speech”—a term with no legal standing in the United States. Violence and incitement are already crimes, yet Bondi is blurring words with actions, echoing the same speech codes that see 30 people a day jailed in the UK for memes. Even President Trump hesitated when pressed on First Amendment rights. But Kirk’s own words left no doubt: “Hate speech does not exist legally in America.” He fought—and ultimately died—for that principle. Will Republicans now cross the red line Kirk warned us about? ZeeeMediaOfficial's report shows why this fight could define the future of free speech. Watch the full episode:👇

DISTURBING: Charlie Kirk’s assassination is already being weaponized to justify a crackdown on free speech. What began as outrage over vile online celebrations of his death is now morphing into government demands to police “hate speech.” Rep. Clay Higgins has called for lifetime bans from social media and even revoking driver’s licenses for those who mocked Kirk’s murder. Attorney General Pam Bondi went further, vowing to target Americans for “hate speech”—a term with no legal standing in the United States. Violence and incitement are already crimes, yet Bondi is blurring words with actions, echoing the same speech codes that see 30 people a day jailed in the UK for memes. Even President Trump hesitated when pressed on First Amendment rights. But Kirk’s own words left no doubt: “Hate speech does not exist legally in America.” He fought—and ultimately died—for that principle. Will Republicans now cross the red line Kirk warned us about? ZeeeMediaOfficial's report shows why this fight could define the future of free speech. Watch the full episode:👇

Vigilant Fox 🦊

84,635 views • 10 months ago

The banning of Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 from the Australian Senate for 7 days is an absolute disgrace. The burqa is a symbol of extreme female repression. This is Australia. Not Afghanistan. And whether you agree with banning the burka or not, in Australia we should be able to discuss it. If the law does not protect speech that offends people, then we have no right to free speech at all. 🔴 If you stand with Pauline and her right to free speech in the parliament, then SHARE THIS VIDEO to show your support 📣📣📣

The banning of Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 from the Australian Senate for 7 days is an absolute disgrace. The burqa is a symbol of extreme female repression. This is Australia. Not Afghanistan. And whether you agree with banning the burka or not, in Australia we should be able to discuss it. If the law does not protect speech that offends people, then we have no right to free speech at all. 🔴 If you stand with Pauline and her right to free speech in the parliament, then SHARE THIS VIDEO to show your support 📣📣📣

Dr Joanna Howe

73,922 views • 7 months ago

Governments Are Creating A Fake Hate Panic To Censor, Interfere In Elections, And Imprison Their Political Enemies It's alarming what's happening in the US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Scotland, Brazil, and the EU The US and other governments around the world are hyping hate in order to weaponize the government against their political enemies. Ever since the 2019 shooting in New Zealand, governments have been using so-called hate speech, fake news, and misinformation as justifications for censorship. In Ireland, the government is pushing hate speech legislation that would allow police to invade homes and seize phones and computers. In Canada, Justin Trudeau is pushing legislation that would allow the government to sentence individuals to life in prison for things they said. And it was recently revealed that the Biden White House worked with one of the leading groups that hype hate, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, to demand Facebook and other social media platforms to remove content and people they don't like. The Biden administration also endorsed the "Christchurch Call to Action to Eliminate Terrorist and Violent Extremist Content Online," which governments created in 2019 to justify censorship. This focus on so-called hatred, harmful content, and extremist content is extremely dangerous. What one person thinks is extreme, another person may view as common sense. For the government to decide what is extreme is a way of labeling someone as a potential terrorist threat. We saw this clearly with the Trudeau government's suppression of the Canadian trucker protests in Ottawa, in which people's bank accounts were frozen simply for supporting the anti-vaccine mandate. The same could happen in the United States. There is no reliable connection between people's beliefs and violence. Attempting to stop violence by censoring speech is totalitarian and Orwellian. It effectively criminalizes speech and creates a whole new category of pre-crime, like that depicted in the dystopian film, "Minority Report." So why are governments doing this?

Governments Are Creating A Fake Hate Panic To Censor, Interfere In Elections, And Imprison Their Political Enemies It's alarming what's happening in the US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Scotland, Brazil, and the EU The US and other governments around the world are hyping hate in order to weaponize the government against their political enemies. Ever since the 2019 shooting in New Zealand, governments have been using so-called hate speech, fake news, and misinformation as justifications for censorship. In Ireland, the government is pushing hate speech legislation that would allow police to invade homes and seize phones and computers. In Canada, Justin Trudeau is pushing legislation that would allow the government to sentence individuals to life in prison for things they said. And it was recently revealed that the Biden White House worked with one of the leading groups that hype hate, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, to demand Facebook and other social media platforms to remove content and people they don't like. The Biden administration also endorsed the "Christchurch Call to Action to Eliminate Terrorist and Violent Extremist Content Online," which governments created in 2019 to justify censorship. This focus on so-called hatred, harmful content, and extremist content is extremely dangerous. What one person thinks is extreme, another person may view as common sense. For the government to decide what is extreme is a way of labeling someone as a potential terrorist threat. We saw this clearly with the Trudeau government's suppression of the Canadian trucker protests in Ottawa, in which people's bank accounts were frozen simply for supporting the anti-vaccine mandate. The same could happen in the United States. There is no reliable connection between people's beliefs and violence. Attempting to stop violence by censoring speech is totalitarian and Orwellian. It effectively criminalizes speech and creates a whole new category of pre-crime, like that depicted in the dystopian film, "Minority Report." So why are governments doing this?

Michael Shellenberger

826,580 views • 2 years ago

Today the Federal Government in conjunction with the Coalition and with no resistance from One Nation passed a bill against Hate Speech. They gagged debate again and rammed the laws through with no scrutiny where we could ask questions. This is a direct attack on Free Speech. For the third parliamentary week in a row the major parties have devoted Parliament to controlling you, not serving you, by shutting you down. The Misinformation Law, the Online Safety Bill and now Hate Speech are all designed to censor people and push back on government overreach. The hate speech law is dangerous because it threatens freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive. Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression. Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. People First stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. Upholding these values will foster trust and preserve the liberties that Australians hold dear. I am disappointed that One Nation did not stand with me on this issue. These laws extend to all people including children. When a motion was moved to exclude children under 14 from these laws, Malcolm Roberts voted against it. Children should not be penalised for the actions or thoughts of their parents. I challenge Malcolm and Pauline to debate me on the reasons why they support this law. It is government overreach plain and simple. There are already state laws against violence and inciting violence. Under the constitution, the States are responsible for policing crime not the Federal Government. There is no need for these laws. They will only be used to censor you. #auspol

Today the Federal Government in conjunction with the Coalition and with no resistance from One Nation passed a bill against Hate Speech. They gagged debate again and rammed the laws through with no scrutiny where we could ask questions. This is a direct attack on Free Speech. For the third parliamentary week in a row the major parties have devoted Parliament to controlling you, not serving you, by shutting you down. The Misinformation Law, the Online Safety Bill and now Hate Speech are all designed to censor people and push back on government overreach. The hate speech law is dangerous because it threatens freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive. Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression. Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. People First stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. Upholding these values will foster trust and preserve the liberties that Australians hold dear. I am disappointed that One Nation did not stand with me on this issue. These laws extend to all people including children. When a motion was moved to exclude children under 14 from these laws, Malcolm Roberts voted against it. Children should not be penalised for the actions or thoughts of their parents. I challenge Malcolm and Pauline to debate me on the reasons why they support this law. It is government overreach plain and simple. There are already state laws against violence and inciting violence. Under the constitution, the States are responsible for policing crime not the Federal Government. There is no need for these laws. They will only be used to censor you. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

177,762 views • 1 year ago

“My Fellow Jews: Leave These Countries. Immediately.” The time is up for Jews in certain countries. If your government blamed Israel for Palestinians committing genocide against Jews and Israelis on October 7th, you do not live in a country that will allow you to live as a Jew. They hate you. They hate you for your religion. They hate you for your ethnicity. They hate you for who you are. They hate you for being Jewish. Whether or not you practice Judaism, they hate you for being Jewish. Good Jews. Bad Jews. Assimilated Jews. Religious Jews. They hate you for being Jewish. Leave. Leave now. Protect yourselves. Protect your families. Protect your communities. If you’re in Australia — leave now. If you’re in Spain — leave now. If you’re in France — leave now. If you’re in any country that does not allow you to defend yourself, leave now. Things aren’t great in America… but the Second Amendment is. It is the promissory note that says: “The government may turn sideways on you, but you can always protect yourself.” That’s America. The responsibility is on you. That sucks! But it is infinitely better than the alternative: being hunted, stabbed, or shot for celebrating Hanukkah on a beach. Pack the Glock 19. Train on the M&P series. Understand the power—and responsibility—of the AR-15 and its cousins. Do anything except nothing. No. More. Murdered. Jews. Our light will always shine through the darkness, but it is time that light is also a deterrent. So leave countries that hate you for who you are, and move to places that will protect you (Israel) or allow you to protect yourself (the United States of America). Daven softly. Carry a big ol’ boomstick.

“My Fellow Jews: Leave These Countries. Immediately.” The time is up for Jews in certain countries. If your government blamed Israel for Palestinians committing genocide against Jews and Israelis on October 7th, you do not live in a country that will allow you to live as a Jew. They hate you. They hate you for your religion. They hate you for your ethnicity. They hate you for who you are. They hate you for being Jewish. Whether or not you practice Judaism, they hate you for being Jewish. Good Jews. Bad Jews. Assimilated Jews. Religious Jews. They hate you for being Jewish. Leave. Leave now. Protect yourselves. Protect your families. Protect your communities. If you’re in Australia — leave now. If you’re in Spain — leave now. If you’re in France — leave now. If you’re in any country that does not allow you to defend yourself, leave now. Things aren’t great in America… but the Second Amendment is. It is the promissory note that says: “The government may turn sideways on you, but you can always protect yourself.” That’s America. The responsibility is on you. That sucks! But it is infinitely better than the alternative: being hunted, stabbed, or shot for celebrating Hanukkah on a beach. Pack the Glock 19. Train on the M&P series. Understand the power—and responsibility—of the AR-15 and its cousins. Do anything except nothing. No. More. Murdered. Jews. Our light will always shine through the darkness, but it is time that light is also a deterrent. So leave countries that hate you for who you are, and move to places that will protect you (Israel) or allow you to protect yourself (the United States of America). Daven softly. Carry a big ol’ boomstick.

Jake Donnelly

290,426 views • 7 months ago

Thank you Secretary Marco Rubio for your stance against terrorism and standing with those that fight on the frontline against it. Note, the first country Lammy lists in the video is Australia, who is currently banning Jews like Hillel Fuld from travelling there to raise money for charity due to being a “merchant for Zionist hate speech” - when he’s not shown any hate speech (see comments for more info) The reason I bring Australia up is because David Lammy says that he is looking to impose a Travel Ban on two Jews (איתמר בן גביר and בצלאל סמוטריץ') for their speech too. Is this where we are at? Banning Jews, sanctioning them and freezing assets because of the things they say? Erdogan, President of Turkey has come out with support for Hamas, he’s not the only one either. When was the last time the UK or Australia sanctioned him? Mahmoud Abbas, said at Hamas Leader Ismail Haniyeh’s memorial in Turkey in August 2024 (hosted by Erdogan coincidentally) that: “America is the plague, and the plague Is America; I will go to the Gaza Strip and from there to Jerusalem. We are implementing Shari'a Law - Victory or Martyrdom” Did the UK sanction Abbas and the Palestinian Authority after that? No. They gave Abbas and the Palestinian Authority £101 million. Thank you Secretary Marco Rubio for moral clarity.

Thank you Secretary Marco Rubio for your stance against terrorism and standing with those that fight on the frontline against it. Note, the first country Lammy lists in the video is Australia, who is currently banning Jews like Hillel Fuld from travelling there to raise money for charity due to being a “merchant for Zionist hate speech” - when he’s not shown any hate speech (see comments for more info) The reason I bring Australia up is because David Lammy says that he is looking to impose a Travel Ban on two Jews (איתמר בן גביר and בצלאל סמוטריץ') for their speech too. Is this where we are at? Banning Jews, sanctioning them and freezing assets because of the things they say? Erdogan, President of Turkey has come out with support for Hamas, he’s not the only one either. When was the last time the UK or Australia sanctioned him? Mahmoud Abbas, said at Hamas Leader Ismail Haniyeh’s memorial in Turkey in August 2024 (hosted by Erdogan coincidentally) that: “America is the plague, and the plague Is America; I will go to the Gaza Strip and from there to Jerusalem. We are implementing Shari'a Law - Victory or Martyrdom” Did the UK sanction Abbas and the Palestinian Authority after that? No. They gave Abbas and the Palestinian Authority £101 million. Thank you Secretary Marco Rubio for moral clarity.

Kosher🎗

36,069 views • 1 year ago

Watch former Prime Minister Tony Abbott speak about existing hate speech laws: “There’s been a double standard enforcing hate speech laws. If you or I say something which is offensive to Muslims, for instance, we’re likely to be in all sorts of trouble. But radical Islamists can say what they like — in terms of “globalizing the intifada,” “murdering the IDF,” “f*** the Jews,” “gas the Jews,” etc. — and nothing happens. So there’s nothing wrong with the laws as they stand; they just need to be enforced equally, as opposed to partially.”

Watch former Prime Minister Tony Abbott speak about existing hate speech laws: “There’s been a double standard enforcing hate speech laws. If you or I say something which is offensive to Muslims, for instance, we’re likely to be in all sorts of trouble. But radical Islamists can say what they like — in terms of “globalizing the intifada,” “murdering the IDF,” “f*** the Jews,” “gas the Jews,” etc. — and nothing happens. So there’s nothing wrong with the laws as they stand; they just need to be enforced equally, as opposed to partially.”

Osher Feldman

93,225 views • 6 months ago