Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

10,420 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Another awesome robotics company raised funds in Europe. 🇪🇺 This time a company that is shipping robots that build! Monumental has raised $32M Series B led by Khosla Ventures, and its fleet of autonomous bricklaying robots has already built more than 100 real structures across Europe. Houses. A school. A community centre. A hotel. Canal walls. Founded by Salar al Khafaji al Khafaji and Sebastiaan Visser, the co-founders of data visualisation firm Silk, acquired by Palantir in 2016, this is a team that knows how to build and sell a company. The technology is serious: → Fleet of 100+ electric autonomous robots operating on live job sites today → Advanced sensors, computer vision and small cranes laying brick to millimetre precision → All driven by Atrium, their proprietary AI software platform → Nearly half of all homes built in the last three months alone, pace is compounding fast The business model is also worth taking a look at. Contractors don't buy the robots. They hire Monumental as an autonomous subcontractor and pay for finished wall. So in the end you only pay for the output. This is the same forward-deployed engineering model Palantir pioneered in software. Monumental brought it to physical robotics years before anyone else in the industry caught on. The backdrop makes this urgent. US construction is short 200,000-400,000 workers every month. Since 1945, US manufacturing productivity rose eightfold. Construction gained just 10%, and has actually declined since the 1960s. LET'S MAKE CONSTRUCTION BUSINESSES SEXY AGAIN! 🧱 ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

72,646 views • 4 days ago

Anthropic's CEO: "coding is going away first. then all of software engineering." here's the part nobody's ready for: AI isn't killing designers. it's about to make them the most valuable people in tech. when anyone can ship an app in 24 hours, code stops being the moat. [Greg Isenberg broke this down the entire playbook:] there are solo devs pulling $10k–100k/mo right now. the apps all have one thing in common : they stand out. 1/ animations & interactions : same calorie app, two tweets a day apart. one with page-bounces, haptics, a "searching" gradient → went viral. the static one → 7 likes. the polish was the difference. 2/ illustrations & mascots : commission an artist for v1 ($200–300), then riff infinite variations in GPT-5. pro move: MidJourney can animate a static mascot for your splash screen. 3/ iconography : pick one set (Hero Icons, Font Awesome, Nucleo). lined OR filled, never mixed. instant "this isn't vibe-coded" signal. 4/ typography : weights, sizing, legibility. 5 min of learning, outsized payoff. 5/ widgets : the retention cheat code. only 4 lock-screen slots exist. own one and users see your app 150x/day. doubled retention on every app he added it to. 6/ train your eye daily : Mobbin, 60fps, Spotted in Prod. you can't ship taste you've never seen. 7/ app store screenshots : your title-thumbnail. no first impression = no download = retention doesn't matter. AI didn't replace the designer. it deleted everyone who skipped this. → save this before everyone copies it

Avid

72,031 views • 1 month ago

a16z co-founder Ben Horowitz: “Don’t follow your passion” Ben gives this advice to the Columbia University class of 2015: “Don’t follow your passion. Now I know you’re probably thinking: ‘That’s a really dumb idea because if you poll 1,000 people who are successful, they’ll all say they love what they do. And so the broad conclusion of the world is that if you do what you love, then you’ll be successful.’ But we’re engineers, so we know that might be true. It also might be the case that if you’re successful, you love what you do — you just love being successful, everybody loves you, it’s awesome. So which one is it?” He continues: “The first tricky thing about passions is they’re hard to prioritize. Are you more passionate about math or engineering? Are you more passionate about history or literature? Are you more passionate about video games or K-pop? These are tough decisions. How do you even know? On the other hand, what are you good at? Are you better at math or writing? That’s a much easier thing to figure out. The second thing that’s tricky if you’re going forward in time with this ‘follow your passion’ idea is that what you’re passionate about at 21 is not necessarily what you’re going to be passionate about at 40. Now this is true for boyfriends, as well as career choices. The third issue with following your passion is that you’re not necessarily good at your passion. Has anybody ever watched American Idol? So you know what I’m talking about. Just because you love singing doesn’t mean you should be a professional singer. And then finally, and most importantly, following your passion is a very ‘me-centered’ view of the world. And when you go through life, what you’ll find is that what you take out of the world — money, cars, stuff, accolades — is much less important than what you put into the world. And so my recommendation would be to follow your contribution. Find the thing that you’re great at, put that into the world, contribute to others, help the world be better. That is the thing to follow.” Video source: a16z (2015)

Startup Archive

358,054 views • 7 months ago