Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Back in 1948, Swedish glaciologist Hans Ahlmann documented warming temperatures and glacier retreat from the late 1800s to the 1940s. He called it "climatic improvement." Finland warmed 1.8 C in that period, and the growing season lengthened by up to three weeks. It was viewed as beneficial, not a...

Electroversenet's profile picture

Electroverse

47,192 subscribers

14,932 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Today's warming is not unusual. A new study using Antarctic ice core data reveals the roughly 1.1C warming of the past century is not unusual in Earth's climate history. The research analyzes temperatures preserved in ice cores stretching back hundreds of thousands of years. Looking at the last 20,000 years, the study finds that 16% of all centuries warmed by at least 1.1C. In other words, roughly one out of every six centuries warmed as much, or more, as the past hundred years. Also, the ice core records show temperatures rising about 12C since the last ice age, with the last interglacial period around 125,000 years ago several degrees warmer than today. The modern 1.1C century scale increase falls well within natural variability. There is nothing alarming or unprecedented or even rare occurring with Earth's climate.
0:50

Today's warming is not unusual. A new study using Antarctic ice core data reveals the roughly 1.1C warming of the past century is not unusual in Earth's climate history. The research analyzes temperatures preserved in ice cores stretching back hundreds of thousands of years. Looking at the last 20,000 years, the study finds that 16% of all centuries warmed by at least 1.1C. In other words, roughly one out of every six centuries warmed as much, or more, as the past hundred years. Also, the ice core records show temperatures rising about 12C since the last ice age, with the last interglacial period around 125,000 years ago several degrees warmer than today. The modern 1.1C century scale increase falls well within natural variability. There is nothing alarming or unprecedented or even rare occurring with Earth's climate.

Electroverse

17,876 views • 2 months ago

Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "It was much warmer a thousand years ago." "And then we entered the Little Ice Age... And since the Little Ice Age ended, what do you think happened?" "It's going to warm up, isn't it? And that's what's happened." "So the real question is, which part of the modern warming is of human origin, and which part is natural? Because we are not as warm as in medieval times, or in Roman times, or in Minoan times."
1:58

Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "It was much warmer a thousand years ago." "And then we entered the Little Ice Age... And since the Little Ice Age ended, what do you think happened?" "It's going to warm up, isn't it? And that's what's happened." "So the real question is, which part of the modern warming is of human origin, and which part is natural? Because we are not as warm as in medieval times, or in Roman times, or in Minoan times."

Wide Awake Media

281,478 views • 7 months ago

The Central England temperature record contains a big problem for the CO2 narrative. From 1695 to 1735, Britain warmed by about 2C as it emerged from the Little Ice Age. During that warming though, atmospheric CO2 remained almost flat. Fast forward to today, Britain is shown to have warmed about 1.5C since the 1980s--so over a similar time period. Activists insist today's 1.5C of warming must be human-driven. But the historical record shows the climate warmed more, naturally. If CO2 wasn't the driver back then, why must it be the driver now?
0:32

The Central England temperature record contains a big problem for the CO2 narrative. From 1695 to 1735, Britain warmed by about 2C as it emerged from the Little Ice Age. During that warming though, atmospheric CO2 remained almost flat. Fast forward to today, Britain is shown to have warmed about 1.5C since the 1980s--so over a similar time period. Activists insist today's 1.5C of warming must be human-driven. But the historical record shows the climate warmed more, naturally. If CO2 wasn't the driver back then, why must it be the driver now?

Electroverse

14,076 views • 2 days ago

Ice core data shows it: 10 to 12°C of warming hit the Earth in just 1 to 3 years—not millennia, not centuries. That’s 20 times the rate of modern warming. So what did our ancestors do to survive such a violent shift? And more importantly… could we do the same?
1:06

Ice core data shows it: 10 to 12°C of warming hit the Earth in just 1 to 3 years—not millennia, not centuries. That’s 20 times the rate of modern warming. So what did our ancestors do to survive such a violent shift? And more importantly… could we do the same?

Randall Carlson

82,750 views • 1 year ago

THE SOLAR SYSTEM CAUSES CLIMATE CHANGES, CO2 FOLLOWS Ice core studies have proven that warming precedes rises in CO2, so we can deduce that warming causes CO2, and not the other way round as Al Gore claimed. This was a political agenda that skewed science. This happens because the Oceans absorb CO2 as they cool, and release it as they warm up. 96% of CO2 in the atmosphere is emitted naturally. 70% of CO2 in the atmosphere has a natural origin. The greenhouse gas effect is caused by water vapour by 80%. CO2 is not the cause of warming, but it's the effect, as proven by ice core studies.
6:40

THE SOLAR SYSTEM CAUSES CLIMATE CHANGES, CO2 FOLLOWS Ice core studies have proven that warming precedes rises in CO2, so we can deduce that warming causes CO2, and not the other way round as Al Gore claimed. This was a political agenda that skewed science. This happens because the Oceans absorb CO2 as they cool, and release it as they warm up. 96% of CO2 in the atmosphere is emitted naturally. 70% of CO2 in the atmosphere has a natural origin. The greenhouse gas effect is caused by water vapour by 80%. CO2 is not the cause of warming, but it's the effect, as proven by ice core studies.

Robin Monotti

42,580 views • 4 days ago

Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer thoroughly refutes the UN's man-made "global boiling" myth. "It was much warmer [than today] a thousand years ago." "And then we entered the Little Ice Age... And since the Little Ice Age ended, what do you think happened?" "It's going to warm up, isn't it? And that's what's happened." "So the real question is, which part of the modern warming is of human origin, and which part is natural? Because we are not as warm as in medieval times, or in Roman times, or in Minoan times."
1:58

Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer thoroughly refutes the UN's man-made "global boiling" myth. "It was much warmer [than today] a thousand years ago." "And then we entered the Little Ice Age... And since the Little Ice Age ended, what do you think happened?" "It's going to warm up, isn't it? And that's what's happened." "So the real question is, which part of the modern warming is of human origin, and which part is natural? Because we are not as warm as in medieval times, or in Roman times, or in Minoan times."

Wide Awake Media

215,707 views • 9 months ago

A new study reconstructs the abrupt warming events of the last ice age. Between 57,000 and 29,000 years ago, Greenland experienced 11 sharp temperature bursts, warming 10C to 16C in a matter of just 50 to 200 years. CO2 levels remained low and stable during this time. The historical record is clear. Earth's climate has shifted far more violently and rapidly in the past, even when CO2 stayed steady.
0:43

A new study reconstructs the abrupt warming events of the last ice age. Between 57,000 and 29,000 years ago, Greenland experienced 11 sharp temperature bursts, warming 10C to 16C in a matter of just 50 to 200 years. CO2 levels remained low and stable during this time. The historical record is clear. Earth's climate has shifted far more violently and rapidly in the past, even when CO2 stayed steady.

Electroverse

13,066 views • 6 months ago

“The climate has always changed” is a common talking point to distract from recent-more rapid manmade climate change. Here’s a quick/simple explainer on natural CC. Natural climate change occurs over long term scales driven by predictable changes in sunlight reaching & absorbed by Earth. Over 10s of thousands of years Earth’s orbit, tilt and wobble cycles back and forth causing an ice age every ~100K years. Orbit: from more circular to more elliptical and back. Tilt: 22° to 24.5° and back. These cycles change the sunlight received/ absorbed. Over the past million years this means Earth cycles in and out of ice ages and interglacials. (Now we are between glacials) A surprising note… the global temperature difference between an ice age and warm period is only ~6°C/ 10°F, but that change takes 10K+ years to happen - until now. Over the past 150 years alone man has warmed Earth by 1.5°C/2.7°F - so about 1/4 of the amount which typically takes nature 10K+ years to accomplish. A super-charged acceleration due mainly to burning fossil fuels & forests! True: The climate has always changed. Also True: Humans are now a force of nature, super charging the natural warming rate.
0:29

“The climate has always changed” is a common talking point to distract from recent-more rapid manmade climate change. Here’s a quick/simple explainer on natural CC. Natural climate change occurs over long term scales driven by predictable changes in sunlight reaching & absorbed by Earth. Over 10s of thousands of years Earth’s orbit, tilt and wobble cycles back and forth causing an ice age every ~100K years. Orbit: from more circular to more elliptical and back. Tilt: 22° to 24.5° and back. These cycles change the sunlight received/ absorbed. Over the past million years this means Earth cycles in and out of ice ages and interglacials. (Now we are between glacials) A surprising note… the global temperature difference between an ice age and warm period is only ~6°C/ 10°F, but that change takes 10K+ years to happen - until now. Over the past 150 years alone man has warmed Earth by 1.5°C/2.7°F - so about 1/4 of the amount which typically takes nature 10K+ years to accomplish. A super-charged acceleration due mainly to burning fossil fuels & forests! True: The climate has always changed. Also True: Humans are now a force of nature, super charging the natural warming rate.

Jeff Berardelli

42,003 views • 7 months ago

A new study finds no abnormal warming across Antarctica or the high southern latitudes, none in the past 12,000 years. Using advanced ice core analysis, researchers show temperatures have varied naturally through the Holocene with no sustained warming trend. The slight rise noted from 1950 to 1990 falls entirely within natural variability, just 0.2 to 0.3 C. Key Antarctic climate indices (the Southern Annular Mode, Zona Wave 3 and Indian Ocean Dipole) all remain stable and within natural bounds. Antarctica is not warming abnormally, as the headlines claim. If anything, the data show cooling since 1990.
0:38

A new study finds no abnormal warming across Antarctica or the high southern latitudes, none in the past 12,000 years. Using advanced ice core analysis, researchers show temperatures have varied naturally through the Holocene with no sustained warming trend. The slight rise noted from 1950 to 1990 falls entirely within natural variability, just 0.2 to 0.3 C. Key Antarctic climate indices (the Southern Annular Mode, Zona Wave 3 and Indian Ocean Dipole) all remain stable and within natural bounds. Antarctica is not warming abnormally, as the headlines claim. If anything, the data show cooling since 1990.

Electroverse

10,044 views • 17 days ago

A study published in Nature's Climate and Atmospheric Science found that despite 70 years of rising CO2, Antarctica hasn't warmed. Not even slightly. The Polar Amplification Theory claims rising CO2 should warm the poles fastest, due to feedback from melting ice and increased water vapor, which supposedly amplify the greenhouse effect. But this isn't playing out. Despite wild fluctuations in sea ice in recent years, from record highs to record lows in the space of a decade, Antarctica isn't warming.
0:31

A study published in Nature's Climate and Atmospheric Science found that despite 70 years of rising CO2, Antarctica hasn't warmed. Not even slightly. The Polar Amplification Theory claims rising CO2 should warm the poles fastest, due to feedback from melting ice and increased water vapor, which supposedly amplify the greenhouse effect. But this isn't playing out. Despite wild fluctuations in sea ice in recent years, from record highs to record lows in the space of a decade, Antarctica isn't warming.

Electroverse

14,277 views • 13 days ago

According to geologist Prof. Ian Plimer, Earth's climate was significantly warmer a thousand years ago. "So the real question is, which part of the modern warming is of human origin, and which part is natural? Because we are not as warm as in medieval times, or in Roman times, or in Minoan times."
1:58

According to geologist Prof. Ian Plimer, Earth's climate was significantly warmer a thousand years ago. "So the real question is, which part of the modern warming is of human origin, and which part is natural? Because we are not as warm as in medieval times, or in Roman times, or in Minoan times."

Wide Awake Media

57,809 views • 6 months ago

A study published in Nature's Climate and Atmospheric Science found that despite 70 years of rising CO2, Antarctica hasn't warmed. Not even slightly. The 'Polar Amplification Theory' claims rising CO2 should warm the poles fastest, due to feedback from melting ice and increased water vapor, which supposedly amplify the greenhouse effect. But this isn't playing out. Despite wild fluctuations in sea ice in recent years, from record highs to record lows in the space of a decade, Antarctica isn't warming. The models may have melted the ice. But reality didn't.
0:31

A study published in Nature's Climate and Atmospheric Science found that despite 70 years of rising CO2, Antarctica hasn't warmed. Not even slightly. The 'Polar Amplification Theory' claims rising CO2 should warm the poles fastest, due to feedback from melting ice and increased water vapor, which supposedly amplify the greenhouse effect. But this isn't playing out. Despite wild fluctuations in sea ice in recent years, from record highs to record lows in the space of a decade, Antarctica isn't warming. The models may have melted the ice. But reality didn't.

Electroverse

16,005 views • 4 months ago

365 years of temperature data from central England, the world's longest running climate record, show no trend. Despite a six-fold rise in population and a surge in CO2, January temperatures have barely shifted since 1600. Likewise for July, the hottest month of the year, temperatures are virtually unchanged. Even during the coal-fired Industrial Revolution there was no sudden spike. The warmest winters on record occurred in the 1700s, the 1800s, and the early 1900s, long before modern emissions. Any warming appears slow and natural, with the slight modern uptick likely linked to two factors: 1) the urban heat island effect, and 2) Earth's gradual recovery from the Little Ice Age. If carbon dioxide truly controlled the climate, the CET record would shoot upward on the right. It does not.
0:51

365 years of temperature data from central England, the world's longest running climate record, show no trend. Despite a six-fold rise in population and a surge in CO2, January temperatures have barely shifted since 1600. Likewise for July, the hottest month of the year, temperatures are virtually unchanged. Even during the coal-fired Industrial Revolution there was no sudden spike. The warmest winters on record occurred in the 1700s, the 1800s, and the early 1900s, long before modern emissions. Any warming appears slow and natural, with the slight modern uptick likely linked to two factors: 1) the urban heat island effect, and 2) Earth's gradual recovery from the Little Ice Age. If carbon dioxide truly controlled the climate, the CET record would shoot upward on the right. It does not.

Electroverse

250,157 views • 5 months ago

Is This The Collapse We Have Been Warned About For Decades? A new study published in Nature Climate Change by researchers at Utrecht University reports that the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation survived 5°C of warming in one model run and collapsed at 2°C in another — with the only difference between the runs being how fast the carbon dioxide was added. Lead author René van Westen identify a critical warming rate of roughly three-tenths of a degree Celsius per decade, which their own institution describes as a pace the world is already approaching. Credit: The Space Desk
22:20

Is This The Collapse We Have Been Warned About For Decades? A new study published in Nature Climate Change by researchers at Utrecht University reports that the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation survived 5°C of warming in one model run and collapsed at 2°C in another — with the only difference between the runs being how fast the carbon dioxide was added. Lead author René van Westen identify a critical warming rate of roughly three-tenths of a degree Celsius per decade, which their own institution describes as a pace the world is already approaching. Credit: The Space Desk

David Ullrich

54,198 views • 10 days ago

The global mean surface temperature today is only about 1C warmer than it was in 1880. This modest rise has been framed as a 'climate emergency,' yet in historical context it is trivial. Global temperatures have fluctuated by more than 10C over natural glacial cycles long before industrialization. Even during the Holocene, recent periods such as the Medieval Warm Period were far warmer than today without triggering catastrophe. The data show no runaway warming or planetary collapse. In fact, historical records reveal warmth is beneficial to humanity and to life in general. This disconnect between reality and the apocalyptic rhetoric exposes the ruse. There is no "climate crisis."
0:42

The global mean surface temperature today is only about 1C warmer than it was in 1880. This modest rise has been framed as a 'climate emergency,' yet in historical context it is trivial. Global temperatures have fluctuated by more than 10C over natural glacial cycles long before industrialization. Even during the Holocene, recent periods such as the Medieval Warm Period were far warmer than today without triggering catastrophe. The data show no runaway warming or planetary collapse. In fact, historical records reveal warmth is beneficial to humanity and to life in general. This disconnect between reality and the apocalyptic rhetoric exposes the ruse. There is no "climate crisis."

Electroverse

32,204 views • 1 month ago

The 1970s Ice Age scare was very much real. In 1971, NASA scientists Rasool & Schneider warned in Science that rising air pollution could cool the planet by up to 3.5C. Enough, they said, to trigger an Ice Age. Three years later, Time magazine ran its famous "Another Ice Age" article, noting three decades of global cooling. The New York Times and Boston Globe echoed the same fear, that pollution could obliterate the sun and freeze the northern hemisphere. The Ice Age scare wasn't a myth. It was mainstream. Even Leonard Nimoy narrated a 1978 TV documentary called In Search of the Coming Ice Age, warning that global cooling could devastate civilization. The same institutions now predicting catastrophic warming once told of a looming crippling freeze.
0:52

The 1970s Ice Age scare was very much real. In 1971, NASA scientists Rasool & Schneider warned in Science that rising air pollution could cool the planet by up to 3.5C. Enough, they said, to trigger an Ice Age. Three years later, Time magazine ran its famous "Another Ice Age" article, noting three decades of global cooling. The New York Times and Boston Globe echoed the same fear, that pollution could obliterate the sun and freeze the northern hemisphere. The Ice Age scare wasn't a myth. It was mainstream. Even Leonard Nimoy narrated a 1978 TV documentary called In Search of the Coming Ice Age, warning that global cooling could devastate civilization. The same institutions now predicting catastrophic warming once told of a looming crippling freeze.

Electroverse

14,457 views • 4 months ago

Matt Ridley, ex-science editor at The Economist, comprehensively dismantles the "climate crisis" narrative: "We know that in the medieval period, it was warmer than today... So we're not in a period of unprecedented warmth." "We're not in a period of unprecedentedly fast warmth. We're not in a period of increasing extreme weather, floods, droughts, storms." "The carbon dioxide we're putting in the air is having a very measurable effect that's beneficial... And that is global greening." "And yet, there are so many vested interests now in continuing to talk about it as a crisis... that I'll not get a hearing for what I just said." Credit: Matt Ridley TRIGGERnometry
2:48

Matt Ridley, ex-science editor at The Economist, comprehensively dismantles the "climate crisis" narrative: "We know that in the medieval period, it was warmer than today... So we're not in a period of unprecedented warmth." "We're not in a period of unprecedentedly fast warmth. We're not in a period of increasing extreme weather, floods, droughts, storms." "The carbon dioxide we're putting in the air is having a very measurable effect that's beneficial... And that is global greening." "And yet, there are so many vested interests now in continuing to talk about it as a crisis... that I'll not get a hearing for what I just said." Credit: Matt Ridley TRIGGERnometry

Wide Awake Media

531,019 views • 11 months ago