Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Back in October, Josh Swihart 🛡 explained why Zcash exists and why it started with Bitcoin: "Zero knowledge cryptography had been around for 30 years. Theoretical math. Academic. No practical application." "Satoshi wanted privacy for Bitcoin. Hal Finney was working on it. Scientists at Johns Hopkins, MIT, Technion figured...

therollupco's profile picture

The Rollup

58,250 subscribers

34,701 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

DROPS E35: Core DAO 🔶 - Bitcoin yield without giving up your Bitcoin Rich is one of the initial contributors to Core DAO, the leading Bitcoin scaling solution. He's also a long-time Zcash holder and early backer of Z Protocol , a new privacy chain built on Core's Satoshi Plus consensus. We talk Bitcoin yield, financial privacy, AI surveillance, and why the next big move in crypto might not be where most people are looking. We talk about: - How Core DAO lets you earn yield on Bitcoin by time-locking it - without ever giving up custody - Why borrowing against Bitcoin makes sense now - OG Bitcoiners rotating to Zcash - what "transition" actually means and whether it's bad for Bitcoin - Z Protocol as the DeFi layer for private money - Why AI has made financial surveillance trivial - and why that accelerates privacy adoption - How Agents are leaving full financial fingerprints - and why privacy needs to be default on at the chain level And much more... Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:05 - What does Rich Rines do? 3:00 - Financial Freedom 4:09 - Journey from Bitcoin to Zcash 6:40 - Zcash Philosophy 8:38 - Transition to Zcash 11:20 - Who is Rich Rines? 11:46 - Bitcoin as Pristine Collateral 14:28 - Criticisms of Borrowing Strategy 16:52 - Explaining CORE 18:58 - Bitcoin Yield Story 20:29 - Misconception regarding CORE 22:08 - Time Lock 23:34 - Risk of using CORE 24:37 - Strategies used by CORE 26:42 - What Bitcoin Holders Want? 28:46 - Bitcoin Yield 30:10 - CORE Alpha 32:44 - SatPay 34:19 - Power Grid Thesis 35:37 - Satoshi Plus 37:07 - What is Z? 38:12 - Benefits of long-term Zcash Holder 40:01 - Vertical Integration 43:12 - Privacy for Agents 44:41 - Faux Privacy 46:14 - Privacy vs Government 49:01 - Zcash’s Future 50:01 - Conclusion
53:05

DROPS E35: Core DAO 🔶 - Bitcoin yield without giving up your Bitcoin Rich is one of the initial contributors to Core DAO, the leading Bitcoin scaling solution. He's also a long-time Zcash holder and early backer of Z Protocol , a new privacy chain built on Core's Satoshi Plus consensus. We talk Bitcoin yield, financial privacy, AI surveillance, and why the next big move in crypto might not be where most people are looking. We talk about: - How Core DAO lets you earn yield on Bitcoin by time-locking it - without ever giving up custody - Why borrowing against Bitcoin makes sense now - OG Bitcoiners rotating to Zcash - what "transition" actually means and whether it's bad for Bitcoin - Z Protocol as the DeFi layer for private money - Why AI has made financial surveillance trivial - and why that accelerates privacy adoption - How Agents are leaving full financial fingerprints - and why privacy needs to be default on at the chain level And much more... Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:05 - What does Rich Rines do? 3:00 - Financial Freedom 4:09 - Journey from Bitcoin to Zcash 6:40 - Zcash Philosophy 8:38 - Transition to Zcash 11:20 - Who is Rich Rines? 11:46 - Bitcoin as Pristine Collateral 14:28 - Criticisms of Borrowing Strategy 16:52 - Explaining CORE 18:58 - Bitcoin Yield Story 20:29 - Misconception regarding CORE 22:08 - Time Lock 23:34 - Risk of using CORE 24:37 - Strategies used by CORE 26:42 - What Bitcoin Holders Want? 28:46 - Bitcoin Yield 30:10 - CORE Alpha 32:44 - SatPay 34:19 - Power Grid Thesis 35:37 - Satoshi Plus 37:07 - What is Z? 38:12 - Benefits of long-term Zcash Holder 40:01 - Vertical Integration 43:12 - Privacy for Agents 44:41 - Faux Privacy 46:14 - Privacy vs Government 49:01 - Zcash’s Future 50:01 - Conclusion

MR SHIFT 🦁

105,467 views • 3 months ago

VanEck CEO Jan van Eck on CNBC: “There’s something else going on within the Bitcoin community that non-crypto people need to know about. And that is: ultimately, VanEck has been around before Bitcoin. We will walk away from Bitcoin if we think the thesis is fundamentally broken. We don’t right now, but you always have to look at the underlying technology and the crypto. What the Bitcoin community has been asking itself is: Is there enough encryption in Bitcoin, because quantum computing is coming? And secondly: Is there enough privacy in Bitcoin? And so a lot of Bitcoin OGs or maxis have been looking at Zcash. Zcash is a token. It’s sort of related to Bitcoin with a lot more privacy. The kind of garbage that we got about Bitcoin four years ago was: ‘It’s used for all bad illicit behavior.’ But now everyone kind of realizes that when you move money around on the Bitcoin blockchain, you can see it. You can see it move from one wallet to another. And a lot of people are looking for more privacy.”
1:00

VanEck CEO Jan van Eck on CNBC: “There’s something else going on within the Bitcoin community that non-crypto people need to know about. And that is: ultimately, VanEck has been around before Bitcoin. We will walk away from Bitcoin if we think the thesis is fundamentally broken. We don’t right now, but you always have to look at the underlying technology and the crypto. What the Bitcoin community has been asking itself is: Is there enough encryption in Bitcoin, because quantum computing is coming? And secondly: Is there enough privacy in Bitcoin? And so a lot of Bitcoin OGs or maxis have been looking at Zcash. Zcash is a token. It’s sort of related to Bitcoin with a lot more privacy. The kind of garbage that we got about Bitcoin four years ago was: ‘It’s used for all bad illicit behavior.’ But now everyone kind of realizes that when you move money around on the Bitcoin blockchain, you can see it. You can see it move from one wallet to another. And a lot of people are looking for more privacy.”

Arjun Khemani

569,098 views • 8 months ago

. Raoul Pal reveals he's been buying $ZEC during this recent market correction, and why he thinks it could be worth 5-10% of Bitcoin "In the world of store of value, there was only one really. But now we've got another one: Zcash 🛡️ - Bitcoin with privacy." "I talked to Barry Silbert about this the other day. To assume it could be 10% of Bitcoin, 5% of Bitcoin - that's great, in terms of how much economic value it has." "Privacy in the world has value for people, and I think people will understand that more." Podcast out this Thursday! Real Vision
1:12

. Raoul Pal reveals he's been buying $ZEC during this recent market correction, and why he thinks it could be worth 5-10% of Bitcoin "In the world of store of value, there was only one really. But now we've got another one: Zcash 🛡️ - Bitcoin with privacy." "I talked to Barry Silbert about this the other day. To assume it could be 10% of Bitcoin, 5% of Bitcoin - that's great, in terms of how much economic value it has." "Privacy in the world has value for people, and I think people will understand that more." Podcast out this Thursday! Real Vision

MR SHIFT 🦁

138,281 views • 2 months ago

.mert says Bitcoin's earliest figures wanted privacy from the start “People don't know this: Satoshi, in the first Bitcoin post, directly linked zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ, one of the co-founders of Zcash” “Hal Finney was also a supporter of Zcash. He knew Zooko, he followed the project, and he tweeted things like, ‘Looking to add anonymity to Bitcoin’” “There's a forum post from way back in the day about adding privacy to Bitcoin using ZK — but ZK was very early, not proven at all. And Satoshi himself says something like, ‘This would make for a much more effective and efficient implementation of Bitcoin. I'm just not sure how to get around the double-spending problem’” “Most of the reason blockchains today are transparent is that they couldn't get around the double spend problem without knowing how much everybody has at all times” “Technology evolves to fix such gaps. And now we do have the tech”
1:07

.mert says Bitcoin's earliest figures wanted privacy from the start “People don't know this: Satoshi, in the first Bitcoin post, directly linked zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ, one of the co-founders of Zcash” “Hal Finney was also a supporter of Zcash. He knew Zooko, he followed the project, and he tweeted things like, ‘Looking to add anonymity to Bitcoin’” “There's a forum post from way back in the day about adding privacy to Bitcoin using ZK — but ZK was very early, not proven at all. And Satoshi himself says something like, ‘This would make for a much more effective and efficient implementation of Bitcoin. I'm just not sure how to get around the double-spending problem’” “Most of the reason blockchains today are transparent is that they couldn't get around the double spend problem without knowing how much everybody has at all times” “Technology evolves to fix such gaps. And now we do have the tech”

Will McEvoy

33,968 views • 8 days ago

There have been whispers of Bitcoin hodlers swapping BTC for Zcash 🤔🔏 Why? Because some Bitcoiners want to be able to transact with more privacy. BUT Bitcoin can still have NATIVE privacy and scale. Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io explains how ZK-proofs and OP_CAT hold the key 🗝️👇 We caught up with the 'Godfather of ZK' on Cointelegraph's Chain Reaction show this week for a deep dive into the promise of zero-knowledge technology for Bitcoin and beyond. Ben-Sasson, who co-authored the ZeroCash protocol whitepaper and helped found Zcash 🛡️, said that Bitcoin can still have native privacy and infinite scalability if developers can agree to reinstate OP_CAT, a Satoshi-era OP_Code that Bitcoin's creator disabled in 2010. It turns out that Zcash's resurgence in 2025 could be the catalyst for Bitcoin's privacy push. "I hope that one consequence of this would be that the Bitcoin community becomes more open to things like OP_CAT and OP_STARK so that it can have post-quantum security, best privacy, best scale and programmability for this beautiful hard asset that is Bitcoin." Ben-Sasson said. "The technology is ready. All you need is a soft fork adding nine lines of code that Satoshi actually introduced. It's called OP_CAT. It's very, very easy. If there's a will, there's a way. In this case, it's a very simple way to give all of that goodness to Bitcoin itself." You can watch our full conversation with Ben-Sasson in the 🧵👀📺
4:30

There have been whispers of Bitcoin hodlers swapping BTC for Zcash 🤔🔏 Why? Because some Bitcoiners want to be able to transact with more privacy. BUT Bitcoin can still have NATIVE privacy and scale. Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io explains how ZK-proofs and OP_CAT hold the key 🗝️👇 We caught up with the 'Godfather of ZK' on Cointelegraph's Chain Reaction show this week for a deep dive into the promise of zero-knowledge technology for Bitcoin and beyond. Ben-Sasson, who co-authored the ZeroCash protocol whitepaper and helped found Zcash 🛡️, said that Bitcoin can still have native privacy and infinite scalability if developers can agree to reinstate OP_CAT, a Satoshi-era OP_Code that Bitcoin's creator disabled in 2010. It turns out that Zcash's resurgence in 2025 could be the catalyst for Bitcoin's privacy push. "I hope that one consequence of this would be that the Bitcoin community becomes more open to things like OP_CAT and OP_STARK so that it can have post-quantum security, best privacy, best scale and programmability for this beautiful hard asset that is Bitcoin." Ben-Sasson said. "The technology is ready. All you need is a soft fork adding nine lines of code that Satoshi actually introduced. It's called OP_CAT. It's very, very easy. If there's a will, there's a way. In this case, it's a very simple way to give all of that goodness to Bitcoin itself." You can watch our full conversation with Ben-Sasson in the 🧵👀📺

Gareth Jenkinson

32,003 views • 8 months ago

"Satoshi knew." a16z crypto research partner Ittai Abraham on how Bitcoin solved a 40-year-old academic problem, and how its creator knew it all along: "It actually took quite a few years for people to realize that this is kind of solving a Byzantine agreement problem… a very core academic problem that has been studied for 40 years." "In that sense Bitcoin is kind of this huge revolution in how to solve Byzantine agreement. In fact, if you look at early emails from Satoshi Nakamoto, he said the core technical aspect of Bitcoin is solving Byzantine agreement."
0:33

"Satoshi knew." a16z crypto research partner Ittai Abraham on how Bitcoin solved a 40-year-old academic problem, and how its creator knew it all along: "It actually took quite a few years for people to realize that this is kind of solving a Byzantine agreement problem… a very core academic problem that has been studied for 40 years." "In that sense Bitcoin is kind of this huge revolution in how to solve Byzantine agreement. In fact, if you look at early emails from Satoshi Nakamoto, he said the core technical aspect of Bitcoin is solving Byzantine agreement."

a16z crypto

50,065 views • 28 days ago

BITCOIN RAILS #69: ZERO-KNOWLEDGE PROOFS FOR POST-QUANTUM BITCOIN | with Benedikt Bünz 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: While many Bitcoiners remain hopeful the network will embrace zero-knowledge proofs for protocol-level use cases, practical adoption has remained limited outside of BitVM and a handful of experimental proposals. Most of the world’s ZKP research has circled around Ethereum and other ecosystems, where significant resources have been dedicated to advancing these systems, particularly for scaling and privacy applications. One of the most notable contributors to this research is Benedikt Bünz ☕️ — professor of cryptography at NYU and collaborator of Dan Boneh, who together inarguably form one of the strongest blockchain-applied cryptography teams in the world. The pair recently announced they’ll be leading the new post-quantum cryptography unit localhost research — the first dedicated PQ research effort within a major Bitcoin development organization. With Benedikt leading the charge on the use of zero-knowledge proofs for post-quantum mitigation, the question emerges: will the post-quantum transition be the catalyst to finally bring zero-knowledge proofs to Bitcoin's core protocol? In more detail, Benedikt and I discuss: - Why ZKPs haven’t been widely adopted by the Bitcoin technical community — and why the threat of quantum computers may change that posture going forward - How ZKPs could be used for signature batching to address larger post-quantum signatures in Bitcoin’s post-quantum era - Why Bitcoiners will likely prioritize hash-based signatures as an initial post-quantum scheme — rather than more efficient but less proven alternatives (e.g., lattice-based) - How ZKPs have evolved over the last decade and may finally be ready for Bitcoin’s strict requirements around trust assumptions - Why Benedikt and Dan are teaming up with localhost research to create the first post-quantum cryptography unit within a major Bitcoin development organization + what they hope to accomplish This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin DeFi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox — an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro 00:22 — Benedikt's background 04:10 — How Benedikt got into Bitcoin and cryptography 07:42 — First ZK project: proving exchange solvency after Mt. Gox 16:01 — ZK proofs explained 27:43 — How security gets popular & ZK proofs in Bitcoin 35:49 — Other applications of ZK proofs for Bitcoin 40:15 — Why ZK proofs haven't been adopted in Bitcoin 50:46 — Why the Bitcoin post-quantum transition needs ZK proofs 01:07:00 — Cryptographic agility and why lattices win 01:18:00 — The size problem and how SNARKs solve it 01:33:57 — Proving a Bitcoin block in a laptop in 1.5 seconds 01:37:12 — Bitcoin as the primary quantum target 01:40:47 — ZK proofs for seed phrase recovery
1:43:41

BITCOIN RAILS #69: ZERO-KNOWLEDGE PROOFS FOR POST-QUANTUM BITCOIN | with Benedikt Bünz 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: While many Bitcoiners remain hopeful the network will embrace zero-knowledge proofs for protocol-level use cases, practical adoption has remained limited outside of BitVM and a handful of experimental proposals. Most of the world’s ZKP research has circled around Ethereum and other ecosystems, where significant resources have been dedicated to advancing these systems, particularly for scaling and privacy applications. One of the most notable contributors to this research is Benedikt Bünz ☕️ — professor of cryptography at NYU and collaborator of Dan Boneh, who together inarguably form one of the strongest blockchain-applied cryptography teams in the world. The pair recently announced they’ll be leading the new post-quantum cryptography unit localhost research — the first dedicated PQ research effort within a major Bitcoin development organization. With Benedikt leading the charge on the use of zero-knowledge proofs for post-quantum mitigation, the question emerges: will the post-quantum transition be the catalyst to finally bring zero-knowledge proofs to Bitcoin's core protocol? In more detail, Benedikt and I discuss: - Why ZKPs haven’t been widely adopted by the Bitcoin technical community — and why the threat of quantum computers may change that posture going forward - How ZKPs could be used for signature batching to address larger post-quantum signatures in Bitcoin’s post-quantum era - Why Bitcoiners will likely prioritize hash-based signatures as an initial post-quantum scheme — rather than more efficient but less proven alternatives (e.g., lattice-based) - How ZKPs have evolved over the last decade and may finally be ready for Bitcoin’s strict requirements around trust assumptions - Why Benedikt and Dan are teaming up with localhost research to create the first post-quantum cryptography unit within a major Bitcoin development organization + what they hope to accomplish This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin DeFi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox — an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro 00:22 — Benedikt's background 04:10 — How Benedikt got into Bitcoin and cryptography 07:42 — First ZK project: proving exchange solvency after Mt. Gox 16:01 — ZK proofs explained 27:43 — How security gets popular & ZK proofs in Bitcoin 35:49 — Other applications of ZK proofs for Bitcoin 40:15 — Why ZK proofs haven't been adopted in Bitcoin 50:46 — Why the Bitcoin post-quantum transition needs ZK proofs 01:07:00 — Cryptographic agility and why lattices win 01:18:00 — The size problem and how SNARKs solve it 01:33:57 — Proving a Bitcoin block in a laptop in 1.5 seconds 01:37:12 — Bitcoin as the primary quantum target 01:40:47 — ZK proofs for seed phrase recovery

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

19,872 views • 21 days ago

Z Protocol: Why We’re Bullish on Zcash as a Engine of Satoshi Plus In an interview with WuBlockchain, Z Protocol Co-Founder Kieran Dennis stated that Zcash shares a foundational architecture with Bitcoin (UTXO and PoW), mapping perfectly onto the Satoshi Plus architecture. Zcash miners can dedicate their hash rate at zero cost to secure Z Protocol, and holders can earn staking rewards through a fully self-custodial model. Furthermore, Z Protocol leverages Zcash's cryptographic primitives, such as the shielded pool, to provide total privacy preservation for the cross-application AI agent experience. Follow WuBlockchain on YouTube for interviews with crypto professionals and insights from an Asian perspective
2:12

Z Protocol: Why We’re Bullish on Zcash as a Engine of Satoshi Plus In an interview with WuBlockchain, Z Protocol Co-Founder Kieran Dennis stated that Zcash shares a foundational architecture with Bitcoin (UTXO and PoW), mapping perfectly onto the Satoshi Plus architecture. Zcash miners can dedicate their hash rate at zero cost to secure Z Protocol, and holders can earn staking rewards through a fully self-custodial model. Furthermore, Z Protocol leverages Zcash's cryptographic primitives, such as the shielded pool, to provide total privacy preservation for the cross-application AI agent experience. Follow WuBlockchain on YouTube for interviews with crypto professionals and insights from an Asian perspective

Wu Blockchain

12,359 views • 3 months ago

BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE #24: The History of Zero-Knowledge Proofs | with ZK “Godfather” Eli Ben Sasson In 2013, computer science professor Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io presented his research on zero-knowledge proofs at a small Bitcoin conference outside of Standford University. The presentation immediately sparked interest from Bitcoin Core developer Greg Maxwell—leading Eli into over a decade of sustained work advancing ZK-based solutions for blockchain scalability and privacy. Today, zero-knowledge proofs are widely considered some of the most powerful and promising cryptographic primitives for scaling—with their full potential for Bitcoin simmering just beneath the surface of active development. This episode shares Eli’s early discussions of ZKPs for scaling, the use of proofs in privacy-enhancing technologies like Zcash, the explosion of ZKPs for Layer 2s on Ethereum… and his recent return to exploring ZKPs for Bitcoin. As always, you can view this episode on YouTube or Spotify via the linktree in my bio—YouTube link in comments as well. This episode is powered by Best In Slot—the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing. TIMESTAMPS: 00:51 Eli Ben-Sasson: Godfather of ZKPs 02:15 Revealing Proof Research to Bitcoiners 04:15 Meeting Greg Maxwell; Mike Hearn 06:10 ZCash: Bringing ZK Based Privacy for Crypto 07:05 SNARKs and STARKs Explained 08:10 Would Satoshi Approve of Bitcoin STARKs? 11:41 ZCash Privacy Versus Monero 13:45 When did the ZKP era begin on Ethereum? 16:34 What’s different about ZK STARKs? 18:40 Vitalik and STARKs on Ethereum with Starkware 21:10 Academics finally appreciating STARKs 23:18 Healthy competition in the ZK industry 24:20 What is Starknet? 25:50 What is an L2, in Eli’s view? 27:20 Focustree, an app on Starknet 30:00 How Eli arrived at Bitcoin Season 2 34:45 When did ZK look realistic for Bitcoin? 36:55 Eli first heard about OP_CAT 39:30 Why Lightning isn’t good enough 40:30 When did Starkware start focusing on OP_CAT? 44:20 Runes bridge to Starknet! 46:00 Expanding Starknet staking to BTC 48:20 Why is OP_CAT “barely enough” for Bitcoin L2s? 51:00 The real reason people oppose OP_CAT, per Eli 53:00 The risks of *not* changing Bitcoin 55:35 The weakness of Bitcoin’s lack of governance 01:00:15 We will need to softfork for quantum!
1:02:08

BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE #24: The History of Zero-Knowledge Proofs | with ZK “Godfather” Eli Ben Sasson In 2013, computer science professor Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io presented his research on zero-knowledge proofs at a small Bitcoin conference outside of Standford University. The presentation immediately sparked interest from Bitcoin Core developer Greg Maxwell—leading Eli into over a decade of sustained work advancing ZK-based solutions for blockchain scalability and privacy. Today, zero-knowledge proofs are widely considered some of the most powerful and promising cryptographic primitives for scaling—with their full potential for Bitcoin simmering just beneath the surface of active development. This episode shares Eli’s early discussions of ZKPs for scaling, the use of proofs in privacy-enhancing technologies like Zcash, the explosion of ZKPs for Layer 2s on Ethereum… and his recent return to exploring ZKPs for Bitcoin. As always, you can view this episode on YouTube or Spotify via the linktree in my bio—YouTube link in comments as well. This episode is powered by Best In Slot—the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing. TIMESTAMPS: 00:51 Eli Ben-Sasson: Godfather of ZKPs 02:15 Revealing Proof Research to Bitcoiners 04:15 Meeting Greg Maxwell; Mike Hearn 06:10 ZCash: Bringing ZK Based Privacy for Crypto 07:05 SNARKs and STARKs Explained 08:10 Would Satoshi Approve of Bitcoin STARKs? 11:41 ZCash Privacy Versus Monero 13:45 When did the ZKP era begin on Ethereum? 16:34 What’s different about ZK STARKs? 18:40 Vitalik and STARKs on Ethereum with Starkware 21:10 Academics finally appreciating STARKs 23:18 Healthy competition in the ZK industry 24:20 What is Starknet? 25:50 What is an L2, in Eli’s view? 27:20 Focustree, an app on Starknet 30:00 How Eli arrived at Bitcoin Season 2 34:45 When did ZK look realistic for Bitcoin? 36:55 Eli first heard about OP_CAT 39:30 Why Lightning isn’t good enough 40:30 When did Starkware start focusing on OP_CAT? 44:20 Runes bridge to Starknet! 46:00 Expanding Starknet staking to BTC 48:20 Why is OP_CAT “barely enough” for Bitcoin L2s? 51:00 The real reason people oppose OP_CAT, per Eli 53:00 The risks of *not* changing Bitcoin 55:35 The weakness of Bitcoin’s lack of governance 01:00:15 We will need to softfork for quantum!

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

46,022 views • 1 year ago

👁‍🗨Not Dead Yet | S1E2 — Eli Ben-Sasson At long last, privacy is in vogue, particularly in crypto. Running parallel to the rise in interest has been the rise of Zcash 🛡️, now even with $ZEC treasury companies forming like Cypherpunk. In episode 2 of Not Dead Yet, Robert Baggs speaks with Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io. Eli is a long-time researcher of zero-knowledge proofs (the technology that underpins Zcash), the co-inventor of Zerocash protocol and ZK_STARKS, and the co-founder and CEO of StarkWare (BTCFi arc) 🥷. Timestamps: 00:00 – Intro 01:23 – Why is privacy important to you? 03:24 – Why is a lack of privacy holding blockchains back? 04:05 – Privacy is normal, so why isn’t it already normal in crypto? 06:10 – The dangers of CBDCs 09:00 – “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear” 12:53 – What are Zero Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) and why are they important? 19:26 – What is Zcash and how does it work? 21:14 – Why is privacy suddenly trending? 23:15 – What happens if Bitcoin doesn’t address its lack of privacy? 28:03 – Can we stop a dystopian future?
30:30

👁‍🗨Not Dead Yet | S1E2 — Eli Ben-Sasson At long last, privacy is in vogue, particularly in crypto. Running parallel to the rise in interest has been the rise of Zcash 🛡️, now even with $ZEC treasury companies forming like Cypherpunk. In episode 2 of Not Dead Yet, Robert Baggs speaks with Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io. Eli is a long-time researcher of zero-knowledge proofs (the technology that underpins Zcash), the co-inventor of Zerocash protocol and ZK_STARKS, and the co-founder and CEO of StarkWare (BTCFi arc) 🥷. Timestamps: 00:00 – Intro 01:23 – Why is privacy important to you? 03:24 – Why is a lack of privacy holding blockchains back? 04:05 – Privacy is normal, so why isn’t it already normal in crypto? 06:10 – The dangers of CBDCs 09:00 – “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear” 12:53 – What are Zero Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) and why are they important? 19:26 – What is Zcash and how does it work? 21:14 – Why is privacy suddenly trending? 23:15 – What happens if Bitcoin doesn’t address its lack of privacy? 28:03 – Can we stop a dystopian future?

Cointelegraph

120,257 views • 6 months ago

My conversation with zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ, Nate Wilcox (Nate ⓩ🛡), and Sean Bowe (Sean Bowe) about the Zcash protocol. 0:00 - Episode preview 2:04 - Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn 2:12 - Writing the first blog post on Bitcoin ever 8:29 - Bitcoin’s fundamental privacy flaw 11:49 - Unstoppable private money 14:28 - Will Zcash compete with Bitcoin as a store of value? 16:33 - How many people are using Zcash? 18:27 - Good security is good usability 22:19 - Social credit systems and ubiquitous surveillance 25:52 - Why Monero’s privacy tech can’t work 37:30 - Integrating ZKPs into other blockchains 42:00 - Privacy comes from money at rest, not from money in flight 49:51 - Why did the price of ZEC fall so drastically in the beginning? 53:58 - Zcash stablecoins? 57:59 - Quantum threats to Zcash 1:04:59 - Encrypted love notes in the blockchain 1:09:16 - Privacy enabled cultural trends 1:14:51 - Nate Wilcox 1:16:51 - Why do you need privacy if you have nothing to hide? 1:18:29 - A brief history of Zcash 1:24:55 - Why does Zcash have opt-in privacy? 1:29:08 - Does Zcash still rely on a trusted setup? 1:33:01 - Upgrading the Zcash protocol to Hybrid PoW/PoS 1:43:03 - A bug that almost killed Zcash 1:54:53 - Zcash’s funding model 2:11:21 - Why can’t privacy be added as an L2? 2:16:47 - Scaling Zcash and making it more interoperable 2:25:29 - Shielded Labs 2:26:51 - Nate’s vision for Zcash 2:30:05 - Sean Bowe 2:35:09 - Censorship resistance is a spectrum 2:37:43 - Will privacy coins be banned? 2:40:06 - Privacy and scalability 2:44:03 - Programmable money 2:45:48 - Summary of Sean’s contributions to the field of cryptography 2:57:33 - Zcash might get privacy against quantum adversaries for free 3:02:30 - Halo 3:07:50 - What Sean’s working on right now 3:14:11 - What has influenced Sean’s thinking in cryptography the most? 3:15:53 - Being a high school dropout working in crypto 3:17:25 - Zcash is just getting started
3:23:01

My conversation with zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ, Nate Wilcox (Nate ⓩ🛡), and Sean Bowe (Sean Bowe) about the Zcash protocol. 0:00 - Episode preview 2:04 - Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn 2:12 - Writing the first blog post on Bitcoin ever 8:29 - Bitcoin’s fundamental privacy flaw 11:49 - Unstoppable private money 14:28 - Will Zcash compete with Bitcoin as a store of value? 16:33 - How many people are using Zcash? 18:27 - Good security is good usability 22:19 - Social credit systems and ubiquitous surveillance 25:52 - Why Monero’s privacy tech can’t work 37:30 - Integrating ZKPs into other blockchains 42:00 - Privacy comes from money at rest, not from money in flight 49:51 - Why did the price of ZEC fall so drastically in the beginning? 53:58 - Zcash stablecoins? 57:59 - Quantum threats to Zcash 1:04:59 - Encrypted love notes in the blockchain 1:09:16 - Privacy enabled cultural trends 1:14:51 - Nate Wilcox 1:16:51 - Why do you need privacy if you have nothing to hide? 1:18:29 - A brief history of Zcash 1:24:55 - Why does Zcash have opt-in privacy? 1:29:08 - Does Zcash still rely on a trusted setup? 1:33:01 - Upgrading the Zcash protocol to Hybrid PoW/PoS 1:43:03 - A bug that almost killed Zcash 1:54:53 - Zcash’s funding model 2:11:21 - Why can’t privacy be added as an L2? 2:16:47 - Scaling Zcash and making it more interoperable 2:25:29 - Shielded Labs 2:26:51 - Nate’s vision for Zcash 2:30:05 - Sean Bowe 2:35:09 - Censorship resistance is a spectrum 2:37:43 - Will privacy coins be banned? 2:40:06 - Privacy and scalability 2:44:03 - Programmable money 2:45:48 - Summary of Sean’s contributions to the field of cryptography 2:57:33 - Zcash might get privacy against quantum adversaries for free 3:02:30 - Halo 3:07:50 - What Sean’s working on right now 3:14:11 - What has influenced Sean’s thinking in cryptography the most? 3:15:53 - Being a high school dropout working in crypto 3:17:25 - Zcash is just getting started

Arjun Khemani

29,363 views • 1 year ago

Did Epstein influence Bitcoin core development? Short answer: No. This is not how Bitcoin works. Here’s what happened: Epstein donated to MIT Media Lab…who in turn supported MIT Digital Currency Initiative…which in turn funded Bitcoin developers. These devs used to be funded by The Bitcoin Foundation (which I used to run as volunteer Executive Director) there are many devs and no dev or team had power or control over Bitcoin. Under MIT’s patronage the devs had the same deal they had with us at The Bitcoin Foundation: that they could work on the code and not have direction from the org. More importantly — how Bitcoin works is that *even if* a dev was compromised then the nodes and miners would still have to run that code to make it included in Bitcoin. So for example if I had somehow asked the devs paid by Bitcoin Foundation to “add 1000 coins for Bruce” 1) they wouldn’t have done this / it would have been counter to our agreement 2) no miners would run that code & no nodes would recognize it. It would be a laughing stock and completely rejected. Does this mean code dev is not an attack vector? No. It’s still a risk. Particularly with nation state style actors and very careful efforts to co-opt which are much more sophisticated than “give Bruce coins” or something. This is one reason I’m cautious of Bitcoin core funding - especially from actors who’ve had bad judgment in the past. I think we should be cautious of who does the dev and view it as an attack vector. Bitcoin code is transparent and has lots of eyes on it. So in this case especially there isn’t even a solid accusation, let alone evidence that MIT directed nefarious code changes. If that was an allegation the first question should be: well what code specifically did MIT direct and what proof is there and how was it harmful? I think claims around this would collapse. There’s obviously plenty to criticize about Epstein and MIT working with him — and when it comes to digital assets MIT’s work with Gensler and especially its work on CBDCs is much more suspect than the chance that malicious code was pushed through on Bitcoin. Be cautious but this is a nothing burger
3:28

Did Epstein influence Bitcoin core development? Short answer: No. This is not how Bitcoin works. Here’s what happened: Epstein donated to MIT Media Lab…who in turn supported MIT Digital Currency Initiative…which in turn funded Bitcoin developers. These devs used to be funded by The Bitcoin Foundation (which I used to run as volunteer Executive Director) there are many devs and no dev or team had power or control over Bitcoin. Under MIT’s patronage the devs had the same deal they had with us at The Bitcoin Foundation: that they could work on the code and not have direction from the org. More importantly — how Bitcoin works is that *even if* a dev was compromised then the nodes and miners would still have to run that code to make it included in Bitcoin. So for example if I had somehow asked the devs paid by Bitcoin Foundation to “add 1000 coins for Bruce” 1) they wouldn’t have done this / it would have been counter to our agreement 2) no miners would run that code & no nodes would recognize it. It would be a laughing stock and completely rejected. Does this mean code dev is not an attack vector? No. It’s still a risk. Particularly with nation state style actors and very careful efforts to co-opt which are much more sophisticated than “give Bruce coins” or something. This is one reason I’m cautious of Bitcoin core funding - especially from actors who’ve had bad judgment in the past. I think we should be cautious of who does the dev and view it as an attack vector. Bitcoin code is transparent and has lots of eyes on it. So in this case especially there isn’t even a solid accusation, let alone evidence that MIT directed nefarious code changes. If that was an allegation the first question should be: well what code specifically did MIT direct and what proof is there and how was it harmful? I think claims around this would collapse. There’s obviously plenty to criticize about Epstein and MIT working with him — and when it comes to digital assets MIT’s work with Gensler and especially its work on CBDCs is much more suspect than the chance that malicious code was pushed through on Bitcoin. Be cautious but this is a nothing burger

Bruce Fenton

231,841 views • 6 months ago

LIVE NOW - Zcash Founder on Privacy, AI, and How ZEC is 'Encrypted Bitcoin' Zcash 🛡️ founder zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ joins Bankless to argue that privacy is back on the critical path, that AI turns chain surveillance into pattern-recognition at scale and that the real bottleneck for cypherpunk tools has always been UX and onboarding. We dig into Zcash’s “encrypted Bitcoin” meme, the dev fund’s evolving design (and why it helped Zcash survive), recent ZEC momentum, and the wallet/intents stack that makes private spending actually usable. -------------- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Intro 0:46 What Failed 3:58 What Succeeded 5:04 Institutional Adoption 6:53 Areas Neglected 10:51 The Cypherpunk Vision 18:53 Can The Cypherpunks Win? 23:19 Crypto’s Path to Success 27:44 Crypto vs Linux 30:39 AI Cypherpunks? 33:05 Optimism 35:49 AI Surveillance 37:10 Zcash 43:02 Zcash Dev Fund 51:45 Zashi is now Zodl Governance Drama 56:32 Zcash Privacy Practices 1:15:56 AI Privacy Consequences 1:22:31 Is Zec a Store of Value 1:26:01 Encrypted Bitcoin? 1:29:01 Ethereum Privacy & Anoma 1:33:14 Closing & Disclaimers
1:34:55

LIVE NOW - Zcash Founder on Privacy, AI, and How ZEC is 'Encrypted Bitcoin' Zcash 🛡️ founder zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ joins Bankless to argue that privacy is back on the critical path, that AI turns chain surveillance into pattern-recognition at scale and that the real bottleneck for cypherpunk tools has always been UX and onboarding. We dig into Zcash’s “encrypted Bitcoin” meme, the dev fund’s evolving design (and why it helped Zcash survive), recent ZEC momentum, and the wallet/intents stack that makes private spending actually usable. -------------- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Intro 0:46 What Failed 3:58 What Succeeded 5:04 Institutional Adoption 6:53 Areas Neglected 10:51 The Cypherpunk Vision 18:53 Can The Cypherpunks Win? 23:19 Crypto’s Path to Success 27:44 Crypto vs Linux 30:39 AI Cypherpunks? 33:05 Optimism 35:49 AI Surveillance 37:10 Zcash 43:02 Zcash Dev Fund 51:45 Zashi is now Zodl Governance Drama 56:32 Zcash Privacy Practices 1:15:56 AI Privacy Consequences 1:22:31 Is Zec a Store of Value 1:26:01 Encrypted Bitcoin? 1:29:01 Ethereum Privacy & Anoma 1:33:14 Closing & Disclaimers

Bankless

60,682 views • 6 months ago

"For every 10% Bitcoin goes down, your rate goes up 20 basis points. So even if Bitcoin goes to zero, your rate only increases by 2%. And it works the other way too" CJ Konstantinos, founder of Peoples Reserve, on how the self-repaying mortgage rate moves with Bitcoin "So, even if Bitcoin went to zero, it's just like a regular mortgage at that point, because you have no Bitcoin working for you anymore. We don't believe Bitcoin goes to zero, but if it did, that would be the consequence" "For every 10% Bitcoin goes up, we reduce your rate by 0.2%, up to a 33% LTV, a 300% collateral ratio. If your loan is $500,000 and you post $1.5 million of Bitcoin, or your original $500,000 grows into $1.5 million, we reduce your rate by 400 basis points. So if you're basic with an 8% starting rate but you over-collateralize, you get a 4% rate" "We believe over time Bitcoin will do what it was engineered to do and accrue value. Intraday volatility doesn't matter, it's a 30-day window. At the end of every month before your payment is due, we take a snapshot. So if Bitcoin flash crashes and bounces back, no change to your rate, it has to be a consistent drawdown over 30 days, and we reamortize the loan based on the collateral ratio at that time"
2:08

"For every 10% Bitcoin goes down, your rate goes up 20 basis points. So even if Bitcoin goes to zero, your rate only increases by 2%. And it works the other way too" CJ Konstantinos, founder of Peoples Reserve, on how the self-repaying mortgage rate moves with Bitcoin "So, even if Bitcoin went to zero, it's just like a regular mortgage at that point, because you have no Bitcoin working for you anymore. We don't believe Bitcoin goes to zero, but if it did, that would be the consequence" "For every 10% Bitcoin goes up, we reduce your rate by 0.2%, up to a 33% LTV, a 300% collateral ratio. If your loan is $500,000 and you post $1.5 million of Bitcoin, or your original $500,000 grows into $1.5 million, we reduce your rate by 400 basis points. So if you're basic with an 8% starting rate but you over-collateralize, you get a 4% rate" "We believe over time Bitcoin will do what it was engineered to do and accrue value. Intraday volatility doesn't matter, it's a 30-day window. At the end of every month before your payment is due, we take a snapshot. So if Bitcoin flash crashes and bounces back, no change to your rate, it has to be a consistent drawdown over 30 days, and we reamortize the loan based on the collateral ratio at that time"

The Wolf Of All Streets

90,567 views • 16 days ago

Grant Cardone explains why people still don't just buy Bitcoin "I think it goes back to the way the Bitcoin community explains it" "I've been looking at the asset for 13 years and I'd get turned off. I'd go into rooms and start hearing stories about how I have to have seed phrases and remember this and have this other thing, and I'm like, this is too complicated for me" "I wouldn't be in Bitcoin if somebody wouldn't have given it to me. I was given 115 pieces for a speaking gig. He literally had nothing else to give me, so I said okay, I'll take the Bitcoin, whatever that is"
0:58

Grant Cardone explains why people still don't just buy Bitcoin "I think it goes back to the way the Bitcoin community explains it" "I've been looking at the asset for 13 years and I'd get turned off. I'd go into rooms and start hearing stories about how I have to have seed phrases and remember this and have this other thing, and I'm like, this is too complicated for me" "I wouldn't be in Bitcoin if somebody wouldn't have given it to me. I was given 115 pieces for a speaking gig. He literally had nothing else to give me, so I said okay, I'll take the Bitcoin, whatever that is"

The Wolf Of All Streets

88,103 views • 1 month ago

Easy says he's 100% out of Bitcoin because Strategy will keep selling it to pay their dividend "This is the most bearish thing. So last night I sold my Bitcoin. I was holding a good amount of coins, I'm completely out of Bitcoin" "100% out of Bitcoin, I hold no Bitcoin right now, zero dollars of Bitcoin. And yeah, I can miss the move. This is so incredibly, beyond bearish, I cannot emphasize how bearish this is" "They have 32 years of dividend coverage, which means they're comfortable continuing to just sell Bitcoin. That's 55 billion at current prices" "Bitcoin is a volatile asset that they're paying dividends with to fund $STRC, and STRC is trading at $90 right now when it's supposed to be pegged to $100. This whole shenanigan is very bad for Bitcoin, because now you have overhang"
1:36

Easy says he's 100% out of Bitcoin because Strategy will keep selling it to pay their dividend "This is the most bearish thing. So last night I sold my Bitcoin. I was holding a good amount of coins, I'm completely out of Bitcoin" "100% out of Bitcoin, I hold no Bitcoin right now, zero dollars of Bitcoin. And yeah, I can miss the move. This is so incredibly, beyond bearish, I cannot emphasize how bearish this is" "They have 32 years of dividend coverage, which means they're comfortable continuing to just sell Bitcoin. That's 55 billion at current prices" "Bitcoin is a volatile asset that they're paying dividends with to fund $STRC, and STRC is trading at $90 right now when it's supposed to be pegged to $100. This whole shenanigan is very bad for Bitcoin, because now you have overhang"

Casper

60,541 views • 1 month ago

A Norwegian student spent $26 on Bitcoin in 2009 and forgot the password. He cracked it 4 years later. His $26 was worth $886,000. – In 2009 Kristoffer Koch was a 22-year-old student in Norway writing his thesis on encryption and digital privacy. – He stumbled across Bitcoin while researching. Almost no one outside forums had heard of it. – He spent 150 Norwegian kroner about $26.60 and bought 5,000 Bitcoin at less than half a cent each. – Then he forgot about it entirely. – Four years passed. – In April 2013 Bitcoin was suddenly everywhere on the news. The price had exploded past $100. – He vaguely remembered buying some once. He could not find the password. – He spent weeks trying to crack it. – When he finally got in he stared at the screen for a long time. – His 5,000 Bitcoins were now worth $886,000. – He sold exactly one fifth of them 1,000 coins for around $177,000. – He used the money to buy an apartment in Toyen, one of Oslo's most sought-after neighbourhoods. – He kept the other 4,000 Bitcoin. – He told reporters: "It said I had 5,000 Bitcoin and I just thought oh wow." – He had written a university thesis on encryption. His reward for understanding it slightly earlier than everyone else was a free apartment. – The $26.60 he spent in 2009 would be worth over $450 million today. A Norwegian student forgot he owned Bitcoin. Cracked the password 4 years later, sold a fifth of it, and bought an apartment with the proceeds. He kept the rest.
1:58

A Norwegian student spent $26 on Bitcoin in 2009 and forgot the password. He cracked it 4 years later. His $26 was worth $886,000. – In 2009 Kristoffer Koch was a 22-year-old student in Norway writing his thesis on encryption and digital privacy. – He stumbled across Bitcoin while researching. Almost no one outside forums had heard of it. – He spent 150 Norwegian kroner about $26.60 and bought 5,000 Bitcoin at less than half a cent each. – Then he forgot about it entirely. – Four years passed. – In April 2013 Bitcoin was suddenly everywhere on the news. The price had exploded past $100. – He vaguely remembered buying some once. He could not find the password. – He spent weeks trying to crack it. – When he finally got in he stared at the screen for a long time. – His 5,000 Bitcoins were now worth $886,000. – He sold exactly one fifth of them 1,000 coins for around $177,000. – He used the money to buy an apartment in Toyen, one of Oslo's most sought-after neighbourhoods. – He kept the other 4,000 Bitcoin. – He told reporters: "It said I had 5,000 Bitcoin and I just thought oh wow." – He had written a university thesis on encryption. His reward for understanding it slightly earlier than everyone else was a free apartment. – The $26.60 he spent in 2009 would be worth over $450 million today. A Norwegian student forgot he owned Bitcoin. Cracked the password 4 years later, sold a fifth of it, and bought an apartment with the proceeds. He kept the rest.

Aisar

209,406 views • 3 months ago

Pio reveals the real reason why Saylor sold 32 Bitcoin "People ask why he sold the 32 Bitcoin, and it's two reasons. They want S&P inclusion, and they want a better rating from the agencies that rate these preferred equities. Right now their rating is junk, the agencies are literally writing the Bitcoin to zero, not recognizing it as an asset." "This sounds insane but go try it. If you have 5 million dollars of real Bitcoin on chain and you walk into a bank for a mortgage loan and offer it as collateral, they go, so that's zero. I'm not kidding. But if you hold IBIT, the Bitcoin ETF, that's totally fine, because it's just an equity." "The S&P gatekeepers specifically said that because Saylor had demonstrated he'd never sell any Bitcoin, they couldn't view it as a viable part of his balance sheet. So he needs to show he can pay the dividend with Bitcoin if he has to. Once stretch gets a AAA rating, do you know how much capital a thing paying 11% is going to attract?"
2:14

Pio reveals the real reason why Saylor sold 32 Bitcoin "People ask why he sold the 32 Bitcoin, and it's two reasons. They want S&P inclusion, and they want a better rating from the agencies that rate these preferred equities. Right now their rating is junk, the agencies are literally writing the Bitcoin to zero, not recognizing it as an asset." "This sounds insane but go try it. If you have 5 million dollars of real Bitcoin on chain and you walk into a bank for a mortgage loan and offer it as collateral, they go, so that's zero. I'm not kidding. But if you hold IBIT, the Bitcoin ETF, that's totally fine, because it's just an equity." "The S&P gatekeepers specifically said that because Saylor had demonstrated he'd never sell any Bitcoin, they couldn't view it as a viable part of his balance sheet. So he needs to show he can pay the dividend with Bitcoin if he has to. Once stretch gets a AAA rating, do you know how much capital a thing paying 11% is going to attract?"

Kai

66,616 views • 1 month ago

afraid I’m gonna get roasted for this, but I did buy some Zcash Curious about the potential of privacy coins and think it’s a solution to a very powerful problem, spending can be too transparent on blockchains I view Zcash as complimentary to Bitcoin and Ethereum. The crypto ecosystem is evolving and growing up my thesis is Zcash /privacy coins could easy be 10-20% of Bitcoin’s market cap, maybe the shadow crypto network will be just as big as Bitcoin … so getting a piece of Zcash at 0.5% of Bitcoin network value made sense Why Zcash over other privacy coins? All gossip, but I’ve heard they have an insanely good technical team. Pioneers of this tech. Also there’s a self fulfilling prophecy network effect ✨ as Zcash takes off its privacy pool gets bigger and bigger making it more useful and more anonymized, as it’s easier to move big sums of value and be hidden. Therefore increasing its intrinsic value Buying something running so fast has got me feeling like an idiot forsure. But can’t get over the idea that privacy coins are going to be a big part of crypto going forward Don’t get me wrong, this is almost bullish for Bitcoin. Zcash needed Bitcoin to establish crypto. Now as the ecosystem matures new coins will pop up, not disrupting the incumbents but complimenting them What do you think ? #ZEC What are your thoughts on privacy coins??
0:44

afraid I’m gonna get roasted for this, but I did buy some Zcash Curious about the potential of privacy coins and think it’s a solution to a very powerful problem, spending can be too transparent on blockchains I view Zcash as complimentary to Bitcoin and Ethereum. The crypto ecosystem is evolving and growing up my thesis is Zcash /privacy coins could easy be 10-20% of Bitcoin’s market cap, maybe the shadow crypto network will be just as big as Bitcoin … so getting a piece of Zcash at 0.5% of Bitcoin network value made sense Why Zcash over other privacy coins? All gossip, but I’ve heard they have an insanely good technical team. Pioneers of this tech. Also there’s a self fulfilling prophecy network effect ✨ as Zcash takes off its privacy pool gets bigger and bigger making it more useful and more anonymized, as it’s easier to move big sums of value and be hidden. Therefore increasing its intrinsic value Buying something running so fast has got me feeling like an idiot forsure. But can’t get over the idea that privacy coins are going to be a big part of crypto going forward Don’t get me wrong, this is almost bullish for Bitcoin. Zcash needed Bitcoin to establish crypto. Now as the ecosystem matures new coins will pop up, not disrupting the incumbents but complimenting them What do you think ? #ZEC What are your thoughts on privacy coins??

Gali

18,644 views • 8 months ago

Double Down #0: Tristan Dickinson lays out Bitcoin's Collateral Thesis 🟧 Every reserve asset eventually becomes collateral. Gold did it thousands of years ago. #Bitcoin is next, and it's better built for the job: liquid, scarce, verifiable, self-custodial, available 24/7. The blocker was never the asset. It was the infrastructure. Borrowing against your $BTC meant trusting a lender (Celsius, FTX) or a bridge. The real unlock: collateral with no wrappers, no bridges, no one to trust but code. That's what Tristan is building at Babylon. + El Salvador, why Saylor finally sold and price calls from $1M to $13M Timestamps 0:00 Introduction & episode highlights 2:56 What "institutional Bitcoin" really means 7:35 From airlines to banking: Tristan's path to Bitcoin 14:00 The credit card story that broke his faith in banks 18:45 Discovering the Bitcoin whitepaper 22:00 Did Bitcoin fail as "peer-to-peer cash"? (El Salvador) 26:26 Bitcoin as digital gold and the ultimate collateral asset 33:52 Babylon's trustless Bitcoin vaults explained 37:10 Would Satoshi be proud or disappointed? 40:15 ETFs, the recent selloff & why Saylor and Cuban sold 47:45 The wildest Bitcoin price predictions ($1M to $13M) 53:00 Why fiat fails, who is Satoshi & what's next Double Down is presented by Babylon Labs. Tristan Dickinson Babylon
1:01:31

Double Down #0: Tristan Dickinson lays out Bitcoin's Collateral Thesis 🟧 Every reserve asset eventually becomes collateral. Gold did it thousands of years ago. #Bitcoin is next, and it's better built for the job: liquid, scarce, verifiable, self-custodial, available 24/7. The blocker was never the asset. It was the infrastructure. Borrowing against your $BTC meant trusting a lender (Celsius, FTX) or a bridge. The real unlock: collateral with no wrappers, no bridges, no one to trust but code. That's what Tristan is building at Babylon. + El Salvador, why Saylor finally sold and price calls from $1M to $13M Timestamps 0:00 Introduction & episode highlights 2:56 What "institutional Bitcoin" really means 7:35 From airlines to banking: Tristan's path to Bitcoin 14:00 The credit card story that broke his faith in banks 18:45 Discovering the Bitcoin whitepaper 22:00 Did Bitcoin fail as "peer-to-peer cash"? (El Salvador) 26:26 Bitcoin as digital gold and the ultimate collateral asset 33:52 Babylon's trustless Bitcoin vaults explained 37:10 Would Satoshi be proud or disappointed? 40:15 ETFs, the recent selloff & why Saylor and Cuban sold 47:45 The wildest Bitcoin price predictions ($1M to $13M) 53:00 Why fiat fails, who is Satoshi & what's next Double Down is presented by Babylon Labs. Tristan Dickinson Babylon

Cito

12,449 views • 1 month ago