Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
BALDWIN: What assessment did the DoD prior to implementing a trans ban to evaluate the impact that this policy would have on our national security? HEGSETH: Thankfully recruiting is not an issue BALDWIN: What analysis did you do? HEGSETH: We did extensive analysis BALDWIN: Please provide it to me
114,069 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
11 Yorum

You mean to tell me this guy may not have done extensive analysis on a policy he implemented? I'm shocked

Spoken like a kid who “left the homework at home” but just actually didn’t do it.

Has there ever been a worse Sec Def than Hegseth?

Thinking about a career in cybersecurity but worried about your technical background? Don't be! 💡 Many roles value your problem-solving, analytical, & communication skills. 🕵️♀️ "Cybersecurity Dictionary for Everyone" is a good start, available on Amazon:

The analysis he made was: TRUST ME BRO

The analysis:

The Pentagon’s so-called “analysis” was a sham. A federal judge exposed how they cherry-picked data, misrepresented studies, and ignored evidence that transgender troops serve with distinction. The real issue? Leadership breakdowns that prioritize political theater over military readiness. If the DoD can’t back its policies with transparent, credible data, that’s a national security risk. Operational integrity demands accountability—not spin. When courts have to fact-check the military’s homework, the system’s broken.

HEGETH: Our analysis was extensive. We asked President Bone Spurs, who took time away from planning the ballroom to say he wasn’t a fan of the idea.

"Just trust me, bro!!!"

He drank a fifth of scotch and did his own research on twitter by reading posts from such esteemed experts as Matt Walsh and Catturd.

@morgfair Translation: there was no analysis just my feelings of inadequacy.
