Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

BC’s NDP-accountable regulator cautioned a realtor for political speech. Corbin Chivers posted about land claims and the closure of Joffre Lakes, a public park, to anyone outside two First Nations. One line mentioned in this post included: “Wrong skin color? Stay out. This isn’t reconciliation. This is racist segregation...

20,528 просмотров • 21 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 12

Фото профиля Bromslee
Bromslee20 дней назад

It's like Jordan Peterson's persecution all over again.

Фото профиля TheMen'sRoom
TheMen'sRoom20 дней назад

How did BC become the leading hellscape of anti-freedom fascism in Canada?

Фото профиля Power Slave
Power Slave20 дней назад

@cosminDZS I was held in Criminal contempt of the @BCProvCourt for over two years during a Judicial review up to the @BCCourtofAppeal I was falsely accused of criminal conduct by Provincial Court Judges and repeatedly threatened with incarceration while all Legal aid was threatened.

Фото профиля Yokie
Yokie20 дней назад

Your weak willed cowardly appeasement seeking political clowns allowed this to happen. Canada is a racist country. You voters are part of the problem you keep electing these incompetent clowns.

Фото профиля Mark Williams
Mark Williams20 дней назад

David Eby and his corrupt NDP government will do all they can to stop free speech !

Фото профиля MrManderly
MrManderly20 дней назад

We all told Canadians this would happen when the courts ruled that medical associations can muzzle free speech in the Jordan Peterson case. It's censorship by the government through a backdoor.

Фото профиля El Punitor
El Punitor20 дней назад

In Alberta we have a prohibition by professional bodies telling their members what they can & cannot do outside their professional duties. We call this freedom which is a concept alien to jurisdictions with @ndp or @liberal_party governments. Canada be more like Alberta. #cdnpoli

Фото профиля JamieBC
JamieBC20 дней назад

By night one way, by day another. This shall be the norm until you find true love's first kiss and then take love's true form.

Фото профиля Jose Putanero 🇨🇦
Jose Putanero 🇨🇦20 дней назад

Professional regulators have been policing speech of years. The BC government is working to more closely control what political opinions professionals are allowed to express.

Фото профиля Patriotic_Conservative
Patriotic_Conservative20 дней назад

We all need to stand together on this issue. Lead the way.

Фото профиля LamNguyenWingz
LamNguyenWingz20 дней назад

Freedom of expression is what we have in Canada. Did you not pass this unit in elementary school?

Фото профиля Camo Strait
Camo Strait20 дней назад

@cosminDZS WOW

Похожие видео

I don’t think enough people are talking about Local Law 97 in New York City. It’s a carbon tax on the real estate industry in one of its largest markets in the world. This has profound implications for the real estate industry not just in New York City, but across the United States: This sort of regulation is on the docket in a whole bunch of cities. Cities are largely progressive. The real estate industry is concentrated in cities and also cities’ largest source of carbon emissions. So it follows that local regulation by America’s mayors is going to have a gigantic impact on the real estate industry, as cities enact regulations to decarbonize. So for New York City, Local Law 97 goes into effect next year. The good news is, under next year’s emission standards, about 80% of buildings should make the cut. But by 2030, as the emissions standards intensity, only about 25% of buildings would make the cut without any retrofitting. Yes, retrofitting is expensive. And it gets more expensive the older the building is. New York City has a lot of pre-war buildings. But it’s a fact that sustainable buildings are worth more money—it’s true today as much as it will be true in the future when LL97 is in effect. So real estate owners need to spend the money now to retrofit their assets in preparation for Local Law 97, and it’ll pay dividends in the future, because sustainability is good business. Overall I think a regulatory imperative for the real estate industry is a good thing. It’s going to lead to more sustainable buildings and more valuable assets that have more functional longevity to them, preparing the real estate industry for the future. For what it’s worth, there are two other forces converging upon the real estate industry and forcing it to decarbonize: Capital markets: Preferentially deploying capital to sustainable assets Private markets: The biggest tenants have ambitious sustainability pledges, and the real estate industry is a huge part of the supply chain to someone like Walmart or Amazon or Netflix. They don’t want to lease an inefficient building.

Brendan Wallace

24,033 просмотров • 3 лет назад

🚨 HILLARY CLINTON’S SOCIAL MEDIA “CONTROL” IS HERE - POLICE ARE NOW KNOCKING ON DOORS OVER FACEBOOK POSTS ⚠️ WATCH WHAT JUST HAPPENED TO A U.S. ARMY VETERAN IN MIAMI⚠️ Police officers went to a woman’s home in Miami Beach to “investigate” a Facebook post. There was no warrant, no criminal charge, and no arrest. When she asked the most basic question - whether she was being charged with a crime - the officers said no and explained they were “just here to talk.” What they did say matters. They acknowledged the visit was about speech, not conduct. They then warned that what she posted could “agitate” someone and suggested she should rethink posting things like that. In other words, the purpose of the visit wasn’t law enforcement, it was pressure. A polite warning delivered at a front door, backed by a badge. This wasn’t an anonymous troll account, either. The woman is a U.S. Army veteran and a former state senate candidate, openly involved in political advocacy. Yet officers still showed up to her home to discuss words she allegedly posted online. Now rewind. Hillary Clinton said on national television that if social media platforms like Facebook and X aren’t moderated, “we lose total control.” Not safety. Not civility. Control. Fast forward to today, and that mindset has a physical form. When speech can’t be throttled online, the pressure moves offline. When moderation tools aren’t enough, “conversations” appear at people’s doors. The visit by the Miami Beach Police Department shows what that transition looks like in practice. If this is just a conversation, why does it feel like a warning? And if free speech is intact, why are police knocking on doors over social media posts? If police can show up to your home over a Facebook post… what do you think happens next?

HustleBitch

98,294 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад