Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

been building an agent-native, node-based, real-time environment. as a test, I gave gpt-5.6 sol a prompt to plan out its own setup and go into a loop of creative exploration until it felt that it was done. it invented every node, every data type, every connection and all of... show more

Spencer Sterling

5,893 subscribers

21,113 views • 3 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

i gave 5.6 sol access to my camera roll and had it extract pictures of every piece of clothing i own from my photos then, told it to find new outfits for me and render them on me with gpt-image! its kinda cool to see your entire wardrobe in a collection like this

i gave 5.6 sol access to my camera roll and had it extract pictures of every piece of clothing i own from my photos then, told it to find new outfits for me and render them on me with gpt-image! its kinda cool to see your entire wardrobe in a collection like this

Thijs

6,262,635 views • 13 days ago

OptimAI Core Node v2 is live. And with it, the introduction of OptimAI Claw. From nodes as infrastructure → to nodes as execution environments. With Core Node v2, every device becomes a runtime for native personal agents. 👉 Get your node up and running. No complex setup. No fragmented tooling. Just a few clicks... and your agent is live. OptimAI Claw brings persistent, node-resident agents directly into your system: • Multi-source research across web & social • Real-time summarization and signal tracking • Autonomous workflow execution • Continuous learning through reinforcement All running locally. All under your control. Supported on Windows & macOS. This is beyond prompt-based AI. Beyond isolated tools. This is personal agent infrastructure. Where every node thinks, acts, and evolves. Claw is now part of the network. And this is only the beginning. Happy Building, Making Impact! 🔥

OptimAI Core Node v2 is live. And with it, the introduction of OptimAI Claw. From nodes as infrastructure → to nodes as execution environments. With Core Node v2, every device becomes a runtime for native personal agents. 👉 Get your node up and running. No complex setup. No fragmented tooling. Just a few clicks... and your agent is live. OptimAI Claw brings persistent, node-resident agents directly into your system: • Multi-source research across web & social • Real-time summarization and signal tracking • Autonomous workflow execution • Continuous learning through reinforcement All running locally. All under your control. Supported on Windows & macOS. This is beyond prompt-based AI. Beyond isolated tools. This is personal agent infrastructure. Where every node thinks, acts, and evolves. Claw is now part of the network. And this is only the beginning. Happy Building, Making Impact! 🔥

OptimAI Network

327,444 views • 3 months ago

The next evolution of the OptimAI Core Node is coming, and it’s bringing one of our most powerful innovations yet: The Data Mining Agent. Become an OptimAI Node: 🔍 What is the Data Mining Agent? A fully autonomous agent running on your Core Node that: + Scans, retrieves, and indexes real-time public web data + Transforms raw information into actionable intelligence + Powers faster, smarter, adaptive Persona AI systems 💡 Why It Matters: Agentic AI is only as strong as the data it can access. Centralized APIs are slow, expensive, and limited. With the Core Node + Data Mining Agent, every contributor turns their desktop into a data supernode, accelerating AI evolution and giving our community a massive edge. ⚡ We’re not just building tools - we’re architecting the global backbone of Agentic AI, powered by you. Stay tuned for teasers, and get ready to upgrade your node. The future is decentralized. The future is agentic. And you are a key part of it. 💪 The more you contribute, the more you earn. Let’s BUIDL the future of AI together.

The next evolution of the OptimAI Core Node is coming, and it’s bringing one of our most powerful innovations yet: The Data Mining Agent. Become an OptimAI Node: 🔍 What is the Data Mining Agent? A fully autonomous agent running on your Core Node that: + Scans, retrieves, and indexes real-time public web data + Transforms raw information into actionable intelligence + Powers faster, smarter, adaptive Persona AI systems 💡 Why It Matters: Agentic AI is only as strong as the data it can access. Centralized APIs are slow, expensive, and limited. With the Core Node + Data Mining Agent, every contributor turns their desktop into a data supernode, accelerating AI evolution and giving our community a massive edge. ⚡ We’re not just building tools - we’re architecting the global backbone of Agentic AI, powered by you. Stay tuned for teasers, and get ready to upgrade your node. The future is decentralized. The future is agentic. And you are a key part of it. 💪 The more you contribute, the more you earn. Let’s BUIDL the future of AI together.

OptimAI Network

50,424 views • 10 months ago

THIS CHINESE DEVELOPER’S NEURAL NETWORK VISUALIZATION IS EXACTLY HOW YOUR OBSIDIAN VAULT SHOULD WORK every node connects to every other node and the whole thing gets smarter the more data flows through it, same way a real knowledge system should work but almost nobody builds it like that most people throw everything into folders and tags and call it a second brain but what they actually built is an archive that gets harder to use every month claude reads across everything you ever captured and finds the connection you need right when you need it here’s how to build the version that actually compounds ↓

THIS CHINESE DEVELOPER’S NEURAL NETWORK VISUALIZATION IS EXACTLY HOW YOUR OBSIDIAN VAULT SHOULD WORK every node connects to every other node and the whole thing gets smarter the more data flows through it, same way a real knowledge system should work but almost nobody builds it like that most people throw everything into folders and tags and call it a second brain but what they actually built is an archive that gets harder to use every month claude reads across everything you ever captured and finds the connection you need right when you need it here’s how to build the version that actually compounds ↓

leopardracer

231,513 views • 1 month ago

The biggest marketplace on Earth won't be the assets humans own. It'll be the data AI needs. Everything that can be digitised is getting pulled in to train the next models. Every scientific dataset, every piece of research sitting in a university, every sensor reading off every John Deere tractor in a field. All of it feeds the machine, and almost none of it is visible to us. What comes out is an agentic economy running at machine speed. You plug your data into a vault, and agents monetise it on your behalf, trading with other agents in real time, in a marketplace we never see. The company sitting on proprietary data becomes part of it without even knowing. This is what the Economic Singularity actually looks like from the inside. The real economy stops being the one we can see and price, and moves somewhere we can't follow. You own a piece of it, or you get priced out of it. Jordi Visser.

The biggest marketplace on Earth won't be the assets humans own. It'll be the data AI needs. Everything that can be digitised is getting pulled in to train the next models. Every scientific dataset, every piece of research sitting in a university, every sensor reading off every John Deere tractor in a field. All of it feeds the machine, and almost none of it is visible to us. What comes out is an agentic economy running at machine speed. You plug your data into a vault, and agents monetise it on your behalf, trading with other agents in real time, in a marketplace we never see. The company sitting on proprietary data becomes part of it without even knowing. This is what the Economic Singularity actually looks like from the inside. The real economy stops being the one we can see and price, and moves somewhere we can't follow. You own a piece of it, or you get priced out of it. Jordi Visser.

Raoul Pal

76,018 views • 3 days ago

Demo 2: human + agent design loop inside Codex. Not every workflow needs the agent to drive everything. You design in Open Design. Codex reviews the output. It can inspect files, open pages, test interactions, critique the design, and turn feedback into the next prompt. Design becomes a human + agent feedback loop.

Demo 2: human + agent design loop inside Codex. Not every workflow needs the agent to drive everything. You design in Open Design. Codex reviews the output. It can inspect files, open pages, test interactions, critique the design, and turn feedback into the next prompt. Design becomes a human + agent feedback loop.

Open Design

20,103 views • 2 months ago

Gave UEFN its own blueprint graph. Python tool running inside the editor. Scans your level and parses your Verse code to draw a full visual map of your game logic. What it shows you: - Every device in your level as a node - Every @ editable reference between devices - Every event subscription and function call - Which Verse functions are actually being used vs sitting there doing nothing What it catches: - Broken connections where an @ editable points to nothing - Orphan devices with zero connections - Unassigned editables you forgot to wire up What you can do with it: - Click a node, and it selects the device in your viewport - Double-click to fly straight to it - Open the Verse file in VS Code with one button - Search and filter by device type - Zoom in and out - Add notes to any device - Export the whole graph as a doc

Gave UEFN its own blueprint graph. Python tool running inside the editor. Scans your level and parses your Verse code to draw a full visual map of your game logic. What it shows you: - Every device in your level as a node - Every @ editable reference between devices - Every event subscription and function call - Which Verse functions are actually being used vs sitting there doing nothing What it catches: - Broken connections where an @ editable points to nothing - Orphan devices with zero connections - Unassigned editables you forgot to wire up What you can do with it: - Click a node, and it selects the device in your viewport - Double-click to fly straight to it - Open the Verse file in VS Code with one button - Search and filter by device type - Zoom in and out - Add notes to any device - Export the whole graph as a doc

Immature

12,060 views • 4 months ago

🇺🇸 Bill Gates attempts to apologize for his connection to Epstein: "I regret every minute I spent with him, and I apologize for doing it. You know, the facts are that I only went to dinners, I've never been on the island, I've never dated any women, and so the more this comes out, the clearer it becomes that while that time was a mistake, it had nothing to do with this kind of behavior."

🇺🇸 Bill Gates attempts to apologize for his connection to Epstein: "I regret every minute I spent with him, and I apologize for doing it. You know, the facts are that I only went to dinners, I've never been on the island, I've never dated any women, and so the more this comes out, the clearer it becomes that while that time was a mistake, it had nothing to do with this kind of behavior."

Lord Bebo

39,180 views • 5 months ago

Today, I gave the Replit AI Agent a Real test. I built an Employee Vacation tracker app. 100% AI prompting, no code. I hated the process until I mastered it. The app I built is so cool that I bought a domain to let you all use it for free. Every step, with great details 🧵:

Today, I gave the Replit AI Agent a Real test. I built an Employee Vacation tracker app. 100% AI prompting, no code. I hated the process until I mastered it. The app I built is so cool that I bought a domain to let you all use it for free. Every step, with great details 🧵:

John Rush

180,273 views • 1 year ago

A sample of caffeine from prompt to launch it took about 30 mins to launch but I wrote an extremely thorough an elaborate prompt. I wanted to QA test if I could crash it. Nope it did QA and solved its own issues for me. My mind was blown.

A sample of caffeine from prompt to launch it took about 30 mins to launch but I wrote an extremely thorough an elaborate prompt. I wanted to QA test if I could crash it. Nope it did QA and solved its own issues for me. My mind was blown.

stoik.icp

21,536 views • 1 year ago

ANTHROPIC LEAD ENGINEER MAKING $2.3M/YEAR JUST LEAKED A 12-PAGE DOCUMENT - AND GOT FIRED 15 MINUTES AFTER PUBLISHING most developers build loops - but almost every loop breaks in one of five ways, and each failure has a symptom visible from the outside without reading a single line of code > Blind loop - the agent waits for a human to hand it work every morning - automating execution but not discovery > Tangled loop - parallel agents share one directory and overwrite each other parallelism that destroys instead of multiplies > Nodding loop - the agent grades its own work and approves it every time a loop that has never said no to itself is broken > Amnesiac loop - results live only in the context window every morning the system wakes up with no memory of yesterday > Manual loop - no trigger a human presses the button to start it that is not a loop that is a script waiting for a person a real loop finds its own work - remembers what it did has something that can say no never lets two agents touch the same file and fires itself on a timer remove any one of the five - and the loop either breaks or never starts 12 pages that changed how I build agentic systems today

ANTHROPIC LEAD ENGINEER MAKING $2.3M/YEAR JUST LEAKED A 12-PAGE DOCUMENT - AND GOT FIRED 15 MINUTES AFTER PUBLISHING most developers build loops - but almost every loop breaks in one of five ways, and each failure has a symptom visible from the outside without reading a single line of code > Blind loop - the agent waits for a human to hand it work every morning - automating execution but not discovery > Tangled loop - parallel agents share one directory and overwrite each other parallelism that destroys instead of multiplies > Nodding loop - the agent grades its own work and approves it every time a loop that has never said no to itself is broken > Amnesiac loop - results live only in the context window every morning the system wakes up with no memory of yesterday > Manual loop - no trigger a human presses the button to start it that is not a loop that is a script waiting for a person a real loop finds its own work - remembers what it did has something that can say no never lets two agents touch the same file and fires itself on a timer remove any one of the five - and the loop either breaks or never starts 12 pages that changed how I build agentic systems today

Sprytix

153,340 views • 21 days ago

July 15th, 2015 was the very first time I used qualitative data to assess my sleep, life, work, and health. It was also the first time I began to see a calendar as a place to store data about myself. Asking how I felt and giving it a number created a deeper awareness that revealed more quantifiable insights over time. When I built Existence, I decided I did not want to do it for just the whole day. I wanted to see the quality of every block of time.

July 15th, 2015 was the very first time I used qualitative data to assess my sleep, life, work, and health. It was also the first time I began to see a calendar as a place to store data about myself. Asking how I felt and giving it a number created a deeper awareness that revealed more quantifiable insights over time. When I built Existence, I decided I did not want to do it for just the whole day. I wanted to see the quality of every block of time.

Rob Dyrdek

44,993 views • 8 months ago

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

249,713 views • 1 month ago

This is one of the wildest things I have built with AI so far 😱 Asked Claude Fable 5 to create a fully interactive 3D crime investigation board using Three.js and it did it in ONE Prompt. It took one more prompt to give it a polished UI inspired by a reference design that I created with GPT Image. What surprised me most was not how it looked. It was how it worked. Fable built a complete Verlet rope physics system with 46 particles in every thread. It handled gravity, damping, distance constraints and all other features of file upload, text and everything. The threads/ropes even lift naturally with pinned evidence instead of clipping through it. I never asked it to implement any of that. I only described the experience I wanted. Maybe that's how we should work with AI. Instead of writing long long specs, we should explain what we want as an experience and let AI do its thing. Anyway, every day Fable 5 raises the bar for what I think AI can build. More to this Live: Code:

This is one of the wildest things I have built with AI so far 😱 Asked Claude Fable 5 to create a fully interactive 3D crime investigation board using Three.js and it did it in ONE Prompt. It took one more prompt to give it a polished UI inspired by a reference design that I created with GPT Image. What surprised me most was not how it looked. It was how it worked. Fable built a complete Verlet rope physics system with 46 particles in every thread. It handled gravity, damping, distance constraints and all other features of file upload, text and everything. The threads/ropes even lift naturally with pinned evidence instead of clipping through it. I never asked it to implement any of that. I only described the experience I wanted. Maybe that's how we should work with AI. Instead of writing long long specs, we should explain what we want as an experience and let AI do its thing. Anyway, every day Fable 5 raises the bar for what I think AI can build. More to this Live: Code:

The Bugged Dev

102,026 views • 15 days ago

i opened dia's landing page and noticed that it was kind of laggy, turns out it loads ~120mb of content on first load and then fetches 10mb of data every 4s on loop lol ngl i wouldn't trust someone with making a web browser if they can't make a web page

i opened dia's landing page and noticed that it was kind of laggy, turns out it loads ~120mb of content on first load and then fetches 10mb of data every 4s on loop lol ngl i wouldn't trust someone with making a web browser if they can't make a web page

wukko

1,011,463 views • 1 year ago

I literally just watched GPT-5.5 via codex beat an Amazon customer associate in real time. 💀 I asked it to get me a refund, and I watched it navigate the settings, cancel the subscription, then it went step further into the help page. I thought it was going to request a phone call (which would prompt me to take over) Instead, it opened: “Chat with an associate now.” That’s when I sat up on my couch because I knew it was going to get real The agent said: “Your subscription is active.” And GPT-5.5 immediately explained that it only shows as active because cancellation leaves access through the billing period, but that I wanted it stopped now and refunded. And my jaw just hung open, it was the first time I watched sand handle a customer service agent for me in real time Once the agent confirmed the refund, it just ended the chat no mercy no thank you LMAO First time I’ve watched a human customer service agent get outmaneuvered by AI in real time. And it made me 15$! almost paid for itself in 5 minutes

I literally just watched GPT-5.5 via codex beat an Amazon customer associate in real time. 💀 I asked it to get me a refund, and I watched it navigate the settings, cancel the subscription, then it went step further into the help page. I thought it was going to request a phone call (which would prompt me to take over) Instead, it opened: “Chat with an associate now.” That’s when I sat up on my couch because I knew it was going to get real The agent said: “Your subscription is active.” And GPT-5.5 immediately explained that it only shows as active because cancellation leaves access through the billing period, but that I wanted it stopped now and refunded. And my jaw just hung open, it was the first time I watched sand handle a customer service agent for me in real time Once the agent confirmed the refund, it just ended the chat no mercy no thank you LMAO First time I’ve watched a human customer service agent get outmaneuvered by AI in real time. And it made me 15$! almost paid for itself in 5 minutes

Chris

1,387,084 views • 2 months ago

This is an AMERICAN HERO American Trucker brought to tears as he makes it into Asheville North Carolina to bring Hurricane Helene victims aid He risked his life, the road was so bad “That was the scariest f*cking thing I've ever done in my life. — Probably the last truck will have to make it up there. That was crazy. I cannot believe I made it.” “Verizon told me I wouldn't make it. The other I got friends, a bunch of friends that tried and all of them went away and didn't make it. — I gave every single drop. I even, uh, pulled back out of my personal tank. It was roughly it's a 210 gallon tank, and I gave it everything I had.”

This is an AMERICAN HERO American Trucker brought to tears as he makes it into Asheville North Carolina to bring Hurricane Helene victims aid He risked his life, the road was so bad “That was the scariest f*cking thing I've ever done in my life. — Probably the last truck will have to make it up there. That was crazy. I cannot believe I made it.” “Verizon told me I wouldn't make it. The other I got friends, a bunch of friends that tried and all of them went away and didn't make it. — I gave every single drop. I even, uh, pulled back out of my personal tank. It was roughly it's a 210 gallon tank, and I gave it everything I had.”

Wall Street Apes

819,932 views • 1 year ago

A few months ago I mentioned that I was a guest speaker at an event with Creative Mornings discussing punk and its influence on me and others. I received the footage of the event and made a video out of it. Check it out if you like. Link:

A few months ago I mentioned that I was a guest speaker at an event with Creative Mornings discussing punk and its influence on me and others. I received the footage of the event and made a video out of it. Check it out if you like. Link:

Myke C-Town Ⓥ

15,716 views • 9 months ago

putting the Claude Agent SDK to the test with an Ad Agent - finds competitors, learns from their ads - prompts and generates on brand creatives - packages it in a shareable report I can run this autonomously or with a prompt. no node based workflows needed

The Boring Marketer

77,498 views • 6 months ago