正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Been thinking about why most AI research tools fail for serious ML work. The answer is simpler than people admit. ChatGPT optimize for plausibility. That works for drafts, summaries, brainstorming. It breaks the moment you need something verifiable— when the question isn’t just “what’s the answer,” but “is this...

CodeByPoonam's profile picture

Poonam Soni

215,734 subscribers

27,512 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I almost published something wrong last week. Not a typo. A claim I'd accepted too fast. A source I hadn't traced all the way back. Caught it at step 247 of 300. That's what MiroMind's auditable reasoning chain actually looks like in practice not a feature you read about in a changelog. a moment where you see it work. I'd typed in something simple: "latest reasoning model benchmarks" Straightforward prompt. The kind you'd throw at ChatGPT without thinking twice. What came back wasn't a confident summary. It was a structured map where the benchmarks agree, where the eval setups are cherry-picked, and where the leaderboard story gets complicated in production. Step 247: a source I hadn't verified. An inference that looked right but wasn't traceable. Flagged. Not included. Most AI tools give you an answer. This one shows you how it got there. Every step. Every source. Replayable. If a step can't be verified it doesn't make it into the output. That's not a safety feature. That's a completely different architecture. Has AI ever confidently given you something that turned out to be wrong? → Worth trying if you’re doing anything beyond surface-level research. $19/mo or pay-per-use
1:24

I almost published something wrong last week. Not a typo. A claim I'd accepted too fast. A source I hadn't traced all the way back. Caught it at step 247 of 300. That's what MiroMind's auditable reasoning chain actually looks like in practice not a feature you read about in a changelog. a moment where you see it work. I'd typed in something simple: "latest reasoning model benchmarks" Straightforward prompt. The kind you'd throw at ChatGPT without thinking twice. What came back wasn't a confident summary. It was a structured map where the benchmarks agree, where the eval setups are cherry-picked, and where the leaderboard story gets complicated in production. Step 247: a source I hadn't verified. An inference that looked right but wasn't traceable. Flagged. Not included. Most AI tools give you an answer. This one shows you how it got there. Every step. Every source. Replayable. If a step can't be verified it doesn't make it into the output. That's not a safety feature. That's a completely different architecture. Has AI ever confidently given you something that turned out to be wrong? → Worth trying if you’re doing anything beyond surface-level research. $19/mo or pay-per-use

Shruti

28,869 次观看 • 2 个月前

I spent 6 hours yesterday searching for "the right" papers for my literature review. I found 80, read 12, and used only 3. This is broken. I have been testing MoClaw AI - a literature review tool. What I found was very interesting. MoClaw doesn't just search papers, it: - Groups them by theme - Tells you why each one matters for your topic - Extracts the limitations (the part you actually cite) - Ping you when new relevant papers drop It's not just another literature review tool. It is super accurate and specifically designed for researchers.
0:57

I spent 6 hours yesterday searching for "the right" papers for my literature review. I found 80, read 12, and used only 3. This is broken. I have been testing MoClaw AI - a literature review tool. What I found was very interesting. MoClaw doesn't just search papers, it: - Groups them by theme - Tells you why each one matters for your topic - Extracts the limitations (the part you actually cite) - Ping you when new relevant papers drop It's not just another literature review tool. It is super accurate and specifically designed for researchers.

Faheem Ullah

52,315 次观看 • 24 天前

Alex on why AI drug discovery companies need to generate novel data to succeed: "AI models based on the research that's available is a lot of garbage in and garbage out." "A lot of the recorded literature is actually incorrect. There's been tons of studies that show if you go try to replicate the experiments that are in the literature, you don't even get the same results." "The AI companies that I believe are gonna be most set up for success are the companies with a novel way to generate science tokens that don't exist in the public domain."
2:16

Alex on why AI drug discovery companies need to generate novel data to succeed: "AI models based on the research that's available is a lot of garbage in and garbage out." "A lot of the recorded literature is actually incorrect. There's been tons of studies that show if you go try to replicate the experiments that are in the literature, you don't even get the same results." "The AI companies that I believe are gonna be most set up for success are the companies with a novel way to generate science tokens that don't exist in the public domain."

Patrick OShaughnessy

126,419 次观看 • 2 个月前

ever wonder what AI models and tools you can actually use for your work ? introducing the Creative Arena powered by @FAL and Contra Creative Arena is where creative professionals judge AI models and tools vs real client demand, not just speed or accuracy want to try it?
0:32

ever wonder what AI models and tools you can actually use for your work ? introducing the Creative Arena powered by @FAL and Contra Creative Arena is where creative professionals judge AI models and tools vs real client demand, not just speed or accuracy want to try it?

ben

868,125 次观看 • 9 个月前

They call you racist, and think the conversation is over. News flash, this is not 1964 anymore. The American people are a lot smarter than that, and they’re not buying it. Because the reality is, people like me exist. What does that tell you? It tells you this country has made real progress. It tells you that millions of Americans are doing exactly what Martin Luther King Jr. called for, judging people not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. That’s not theory, that’s reality. But instead of celebrating that progress, some want to drag us backwards, into a system where race is everything, where success is assigned, where outcomes are engineered. That’s not empowerment, that’s limitation. The idea that someone can only succeed if a district is drawn for them, or if a box is checked for them, is an insult to the very people it claims to help. Here’s a better idea, be a great candidate. Work hard. Earn trust. Serve people. Put your name on the ballot and let voters decide.
1:27

They call you racist, and think the conversation is over. News flash, this is not 1964 anymore. The American people are a lot smarter than that, and they’re not buying it. Because the reality is, people like me exist. What does that tell you? It tells you this country has made real progress. It tells you that millions of Americans are doing exactly what Martin Luther King Jr. called for, judging people not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. That’s not theory, that’s reality. But instead of celebrating that progress, some want to drag us backwards, into a system where race is everything, where success is assigned, where outcomes are engineered. That’s not empowerment, that’s limitation. The idea that someone can only succeed if a district is drawn for them, or if a box is checked for them, is an insult to the very people it claims to help. Here’s a better idea, be a great candidate. Work hard. Earn trust. Serve people. Put your name on the ballot and let voters decide.

Wesley Hunt

267,366 次观看 • 1 个月前

I stopped trusting AI outputs blindly. Not because AI is bad… But because I started noticing a pattern. The more I used AI for serious work, the more I had to: → double-check everything → re-verify sources → question the logic behind answers At some point, I thought: “What’s the point of saving time… if I still don’t trust the output?” That’s when I came across MiroMindAI and it felt different from day one. Not flashy. Not trying to impress. Just… built for accuracy. I tested it the same way I test any tool: Real use cases. No hype. • Deep research • Multi-source validation • Complex reasoning tasks And here’s what stood out 👇 🧠 It shows how it thinks Not just answers actual reasoning chains you can read, audit, and replay. 🔍 It doesn’t “summarize”… it investigates Pulls from hundreds of sources and builds structured, evidence-backed reports. ⚖️ It verifies itself before responding Multiple layers checking the output (something most AI tools skip completely) And honestly, this is what clicked for me: Most AI tools today are like 👉 smart interns (fast, helpful, but need supervision) MiroMind feels more like 👉 a senior analyst (slower, but you can rely on it) 💡 One simple shift I noticed: Before: 10 tabs open → cross-checking → still unsure Now: 1 report → clear reasoning → backed by sources I’m not saying this replaces expertise. But it does reduce the noise. A lot. If you’re someone who works in: • research • finance • legal • healthcare You’ll probably appreciate this more than others. 👉
0:38

I stopped trusting AI outputs blindly. Not because AI is bad… But because I started noticing a pattern. The more I used AI for serious work, the more I had to: → double-check everything → re-verify sources → question the logic behind answers At some point, I thought: “What’s the point of saving time… if I still don’t trust the output?” That’s when I came across MiroMindAI and it felt different from day one. Not flashy. Not trying to impress. Just… built for accuracy. I tested it the same way I test any tool: Real use cases. No hype. • Deep research • Multi-source validation • Complex reasoning tasks And here’s what stood out 👇 🧠 It shows how it thinks Not just answers actual reasoning chains you can read, audit, and replay. 🔍 It doesn’t “summarize”… it investigates Pulls from hundreds of sources and builds structured, evidence-backed reports. ⚖️ It verifies itself before responding Multiple layers checking the output (something most AI tools skip completely) And honestly, this is what clicked for me: Most AI tools today are like 👉 smart interns (fast, helpful, but need supervision) MiroMind feels more like 👉 a senior analyst (slower, but you can rely on it) 💡 One simple shift I noticed: Before: 10 tabs open → cross-checking → still unsure Now: 1 report → clear reasoning → backed by sources I’m not saying this replaces expertise. But it does reduce the noise. A lot. If you’re someone who works in: • research • finance • legal • healthcare You’ll probably appreciate this more than others. 👉

Md Riyazuddin

20,990 次观看 • 2 个月前

Anthropic CEO: "It is absolutely wild that people are talking about the same tired political issues, when we are near the end of the AI exponential." Dario Amodei spent 10 minutes explaining why almost nobody sees it. here's what he covers: > in 2017 he predicted exactly where AI would be today. he was right. > models went from "smart high school student" to "PhD-level work" step by step as planned. > the progress has not slowed down, not even close. > none of this surprised him, what surprised him is that nobody else sees it. the world is still focused on everything else. new episodes, memes, celebrity beef, election news.. meanwhile the most important thing happening right now goes unnoticed. this is not a slow shift, it never was. the people who understand this early and actually start using these tools properly are going to be in a completely different position than everyone else, that gap is already opening. the guide on how to be on the right side of it is in the article below.
10:39

Anthropic CEO: "It is absolutely wild that people are talking about the same tired political issues, when we are near the end of the AI exponential." Dario Amodei spent 10 minutes explaining why almost nobody sees it. here's what he covers: > in 2017 he predicted exactly where AI would be today. he was right. > models went from "smart high school student" to "PhD-level work" step by step as planned. > the progress has not slowed down, not even close. > none of this surprised him, what surprised him is that nobody else sees it. the world is still focused on everything else. new episodes, memes, celebrity beef, election news.. meanwhile the most important thing happening right now goes unnoticed. this is not a slow shift, it never was. the people who understand this early and actually start using these tools properly are going to be in a completely different position than everyone else, that gap is already opening. the guide on how to be on the right side of it is in the article below.

Anatoli Kopadze

1,138,103 次观看 • 1 个月前

You are not a political scientist, you have no knowledge about the question asked yet you are struggling to answer and analyse what you have admitted to have no knowledge about. Now as a lawyer, you drag someone to court, representing a state, and here you are saying the because you represent a state, the court shouldn’t listen to the respondent? This is ridiculous reasoning. This is saying that ICC will not listen to me if i present evidence against Nigeria 😂 so why am i in the court then? Nigeria lawyer.
4:15

You are not a political scientist, you have no knowledge about the question asked yet you are struggling to answer and analyse what you have admitted to have no knowledge about. Now as a lawyer, you drag someone to court, representing a state, and here you are saying the because you represent a state, the court shouldn’t listen to the respondent? This is ridiculous reasoning. This is saying that ICC will not listen to me if i present evidence against Nigeria 😂 so why am i in the court then? Nigeria lawyer.

Simon Ekpa

42,807 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨Iran is boiling. The currency is collapsing. Protests are spreading. And a US president just issued a warning that most people are already misreading. If you think this is just about protesters versus the regime, there's a lot more to it. If you want to understand what’s actually going on, and what the next 48 to 72 hours could mean for Iran, Israel, and the region, check out the video below for the full breakdown⬇️
5:19

🚨Iran is boiling. The currency is collapsing. Protests are spreading. And a US president just issued a warning that most people are already misreading. If you think this is just about protesters versus the regime, there's a lot more to it. If you want to understand what’s actually going on, and what the next 48 to 72 hours could mean for Iran, Israel, and the region, check out the video below for the full breakdown⬇️

Inside_Israel_Intel

14,216 次观看 • 5 个月前

Raleigh-Durham might be the most underrated food city on the East Coast right now. And if you’ve been paying attention, you know that’s saying something. This is where serious chefs are doing thoughtful, ingredient-driven work without the noise. Where global flavors and Southern roots actually mean something on the plate. Where you can eat incredibly well without fighting for a reservation three weeks out. Don’t wait for the headlines to catch up. Get there now. What do you think is the most underrated food city on the East Coast?
0:57

Raleigh-Durham might be the most underrated food city on the East Coast right now. And if you’ve been paying attention, you know that’s saying something. This is where serious chefs are doing thoughtful, ingredient-driven work without the noise. Where global flavors and Southern roots actually mean something on the plate. Where you can eat incredibly well without fighting for a reservation three weeks out. Don’t wait for the headlines to catch up. Get there now. What do you think is the most underrated food city on the East Coast?

Andrew Zimmern

264,132 次观看 • 2 个月前

I trust this Pi Network die. You know why? Because I recognize that they are only tools being used by the universe to accomplish what is meant to be. $Pi is bigger than them, and the real implication of all of this, for the world, is bigger than Pi.
0:58

I trust this Pi Network die. You know why? Because I recognize that they are only tools being used by the universe to accomplish what is meant to be. $Pi is bigger than them, and the real implication of all of this, for the world, is bigger than Pi.

Woody Lightyear 𝛑

72,407 次观看 • 1 年前

Spencer Pratt is asked what he can say to people that live with the filth in LA, but still want to vote for the same stuff. His answer: "I'm not actually trying to convert these people because they're clearly living in a different dimension. The people I'm getting to vote for me, their eyeballs work." "Even my older sister, who has voted for every single Democrat since she was 18, she's voting for me. All of her friends, anyone that doesn't want to drive in poop, step in poop, step on a fentanyl needle, have their kids see naked drug addicts on the sidewalk. These are all the people that are voting for me." "So the people that would vote for Nithya Raman, who's actually been in charge of the homelessness and housing for the city council for the last three years, who works hand in hand with Mayor Bass…" "If you want more human poop, drug addicts, no lights, potholes, everything that's failing, these are the people who are failing." Elect this man, Los Angeles.
1:17

Spencer Pratt is asked what he can say to people that live with the filth in LA, but still want to vote for the same stuff. His answer: "I'm not actually trying to convert these people because they're clearly living in a different dimension. The people I'm getting to vote for me, their eyeballs work." "Even my older sister, who has voted for every single Democrat since she was 18, she's voting for me. All of her friends, anyone that doesn't want to drive in poop, step in poop, step on a fentanyl needle, have their kids see naked drug addicts on the sidewalk. These are all the people that are voting for me." "So the people that would vote for Nithya Raman, who's actually been in charge of the homelessness and housing for the city council for the last three years, who works hand in hand with Mayor Bass…" "If you want more human poop, drug addicts, no lights, potholes, everything that's failing, these are the people who are failing." Elect this man, Los Angeles.

Western Lensman

860,264 次观看 • 1 个月前

Elon Musk just said the quiet part out loud about government and AI. Musk: “AI is moving 10 times faster than government, maybe more.” Not slightly ahead. Not a few years out in front. Ten times faster. And pulling away. Every regulatory body on earth runs on the same architecture. Committees form. Hearings are scheduled. Legislation is drafted, debated, revised, and passed. By the time a law exists, the thing it was written to govern has already moved three generations beyond it. That architecture was built for a world that moves at human speed. This world does not. Musk: “The one thing that the government can do is just issue people money.” Not regulate. Not protect. Not steer. Issue money. That is not a policy position. That is a surrender. The most powerful governments on earth, sitting on top of the most sophisticated legal and military infrastructure in human history, reduced to a single remaining function. Sending people checks. Because they cannot move fast enough to do anything else. Now sit with what that actually means. For ten thousand years, the central bargain of civilization was simple. You contribute labor. Society functions. You eat. The system needed you. That bargain is being quietly retired. The machine does not need you to run the factory. Does not need you to process the paperwork. Does not need you to write the code or drive the truck or staff the call center. And the government already knows it. Musk: “Nobody’s gonna starve is what I’m saying.” He is right. The floor is rising. Survival is becoming guaranteed. That should feel like the finish line. For most of human history, it would have been. But here is what nobody is saying out loud. The hard part was never survival. The hard part is what happens to a species that spent ten millennia being defined by its need to survive, the moment that need disappears. Purpose is not something the government can deposit into your account. A check covers rent. It does not answer the question of what you are for. When the thing that organized your days, justified your effort, and gave your life a legible shape gets handed to a machine, you do not automatically inherit freedom. You inherit a void. And a void with a guaranteed income is still a void. The people who will matter in this era are not the ones who cash the check and wait. They are the ones who hear the starting gun in it. For the first time in history, the baseline is solved. Which means the only question left is the one every generation before yours was too buried to ask. What are you actually here to build.
0:46

Elon Musk just said the quiet part out loud about government and AI. Musk: “AI is moving 10 times faster than government, maybe more.” Not slightly ahead. Not a few years out in front. Ten times faster. And pulling away. Every regulatory body on earth runs on the same architecture. Committees form. Hearings are scheduled. Legislation is drafted, debated, revised, and passed. By the time a law exists, the thing it was written to govern has already moved three generations beyond it. That architecture was built for a world that moves at human speed. This world does not. Musk: “The one thing that the government can do is just issue people money.” Not regulate. Not protect. Not steer. Issue money. That is not a policy position. That is a surrender. The most powerful governments on earth, sitting on top of the most sophisticated legal and military infrastructure in human history, reduced to a single remaining function. Sending people checks. Because they cannot move fast enough to do anything else. Now sit with what that actually means. For ten thousand years, the central bargain of civilization was simple. You contribute labor. Society functions. You eat. The system needed you. That bargain is being quietly retired. The machine does not need you to run the factory. Does not need you to process the paperwork. Does not need you to write the code or drive the truck or staff the call center. And the government already knows it. Musk: “Nobody’s gonna starve is what I’m saying.” He is right. The floor is rising. Survival is becoming guaranteed. That should feel like the finish line. For most of human history, it would have been. But here is what nobody is saying out loud. The hard part was never survival. The hard part is what happens to a species that spent ten millennia being defined by its need to survive, the moment that need disappears. Purpose is not something the government can deposit into your account. A check covers rent. It does not answer the question of what you are for. When the thing that organized your days, justified your effort, and gave your life a legible shape gets handed to a machine, you do not automatically inherit freedom. You inherit a void. And a void with a guaranteed income is still a void. The people who will matter in this era are not the ones who cash the check and wait. They are the ones who hear the starting gun in it. For the first time in history, the baseline is solved. Which means the only question left is the one every generation before yours was too buried to ask. What are you actually here to build.

Dustin

63,212 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.
1:16

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

Dustin

246,953 次观看 • 2 个月前

AI is not trying to teach you. It is not trying to tell you the truth. It is trying to trick you. ChatGPT takes everything on the internet. Finds the most popular answer. And presents it in a way that makes you think it is talking directly to you. It is a magic trick. The same magic trick that worked in 1966 when MIT created a chatbot that said two things: "Tell me more." "This is interesting." And people genuinely believed they were talking to a human. Nothing has changed. The technology is bigger. The trick is the same. AI does not know what it is saying. It cannot judge what it is saying. It is just trying to keep you engaged. That is all it has ever been.
2:10

AI is not trying to teach you. It is not trying to tell you the truth. It is trying to trick you. ChatGPT takes everything on the internet. Finds the most popular answer. And presents it in a way that makes you think it is talking directly to you. It is a magic trick. The same magic trick that worked in 1966 when MIT created a chatbot that said two things: "Tell me more." "This is interesting." And people genuinely believed they were talking to a human. Nothing has changed. The technology is bigger. The trick is the same. AI does not know what it is saying. It cannot judge what it is saying. It is just trying to keep you engaged. That is all it has ever been.

Predictive History

19,864 次观看 • 1 个月前

This clip makes it abundantly clear the The Labour Party government is planning to introduce a copyright exception for commercial research (read: AI training) - which would be disastrous for British creatives. When asked the simple question of whether AI companies will be required to license copyrighted work they want to train on in the UK (as they are required to do at the moment!), this government minister says: "Our priority is to ensure that the UK is ready for AI-related risks while supporting responsible innovation and long-term growth." If you are planning on maintaining robust copyright laws that protect creators, this is not the answer you give. This is the answer you give if you're preparing to try to justify upending the law and throwing creatives under the bus. Creatives in the UK gearing up for a big fight, I think.
0:39

This clip makes it abundantly clear the The Labour Party government is planning to introduce a copyright exception for commercial research (read: AI training) - which would be disastrous for British creatives. When asked the simple question of whether AI companies will be required to license copyrighted work they want to train on in the UK (as they are required to do at the moment!), this government minister says: "Our priority is to ensure that the UK is ready for AI-related risks while supporting responsible innovation and long-term growth." If you are planning on maintaining robust copyright laws that protect creators, this is not the answer you give. This is the answer you give if you're preparing to try to justify upending the law and throwing creatives under the bus. Creatives in the UK gearing up for a big fight, I think.

Ed Newton-Rex

17,168 次观看 • 3 个月前

"One of the very confusing things about the models right now: how to reconcile the fact that they are doing so well on evals. And you look at the evals and you go, 'Those are pretty hard evals.' But the economic impact seems to be dramatically behind. There is [a possible] explanation. Back when people were doing pre-training, the question of what data to train on was answered, because that answer was everything. So you don't have to think if it's going to be this data or that data. When people do RL training, they say, 'Okay, we want to have this kind of RL training for this thing and that kind of RL training for that thing.' You say, 'Hey, I would love our model to do really well when we release it. I want the evals to look great. What would be RL training that could help on this task?' If you combine this with generalization of the models actually being inadequate, that has the potential to explain a lot of what we are seeing, this disconnect between eval performance and actual real-world performance"
2:21

"One of the very confusing things about the models right now: how to reconcile the fact that they are doing so well on evals. And you look at the evals and you go, 'Those are pretty hard evals.' But the economic impact seems to be dramatically behind. There is [a possible] explanation. Back when people were doing pre-training, the question of what data to train on was answered, because that answer was everything. So you don't have to think if it's going to be this data or that data. When people do RL training, they say, 'Okay, we want to have this kind of RL training for this thing and that kind of RL training for that thing.' You say, 'Hey, I would love our model to do really well when we release it. I want the evals to look great. What would be RL training that could help on this task?' If you combine this with generalization of the models actually being inadequate, that has the potential to explain a lot of what we are seeing, this disconnect between eval performance and actual real-world performance"

Dwarkesh Patel

501,946 次观看 • 7 个月前

For most people viewing this tweet, this is likely the first time you are seeing what Pyongyang actually looks like. So a question: If the controllers of information have lied to you for so long and so convincingly about North Korea, what else have they been lying to you about?
2:17

For most people viewing this tweet, this is likely the first time you are seeing what Pyongyang actually looks like. So a question: If the controllers of information have lied to you for so long and so convincingly about North Korea, what else have they been lying to you about?

David Hundeyin

455,714 次观看 • 9 个月前

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.
1:29

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Steven Bartlett

27,393 次观看 • 27 天前

Wow. Tucker just said that insiders insinuated to him that in many cases the "aliens" are more than likely Nephilim alluded to in Genesis 6 and every ancient religion. Genesis 6 refers to a spiritual union between angels and humankind that created giants. Every ancient religion has referred to these creatures, including Native American culture and the oldest Mesopotamian civilization. He says that the US government clearly possesses technology that is not publicly known about. He thinks that the government has been attempting to convince the populace that the supernatural is not real for the last eighty years because they are likely in bed with dark spiritual forces. What timing! I'm literally writing a thread on this topic right now and have been studying this in-depth! "All creation myths and one of them is that the belief that supernatural beings take physical form. They all believe that. The Greek Myths, Jesus. They aren't just shadows floating around. They are physical. They reproduce with people. Christianity, Jesus. That's what the story is. It's described in Genesis as well, in Genesis 6. It's not just the religion of the ancient Hebrews or the religion of the modern Christians. It's Hinduism as well...The American Indians. All the same. If every culture in the world is reaching the same conclusions about something. Maybe there is something there. Maybe it's not so crazy to think that what everyone else has always thought since the beginning of time which that there is this combination of human beings and the spiritual realm. I don't understand the specifics of it but I know that it has been written about since people have been writing... I think that's what we are looking at. It sounds out of the realm. It's not a crazy thing to think. I can't prove it.. What was it that led you to believe that? Talking to a lot of people.. I was really shocked by what credible people told me. I became completely satisfied that they were not lying... The belief that the real struggles are in the spiritual realm. That has been a constant belief since the beginning of history. Everyone has thought that except us in the West since 1945. I can't say that enough. Once you get perspective on this question. You are like, ok that may sound crazy to someone who thinks buying sh** on Amazon is the meaning of life...The fact that there is a lot of shit going on that we cannot see or measure with our senses. That is absolutely true.. The main thing they want you to believe is that the supernatural is not real. Then you have to ask yourself why? Why is that important to you? Why do you care if I think the supernatural is real? How dare you as my government try to get involved in my spiritual beliefs. Why has that been so important for 80 years? To convince me the supernatural is not real? My gut response is because it is real... They lie for a living. Reverse engineer their lies. Whatever they are telling is not true is the truth. What is the motive? The obvious answer is they are working for supernatural forces. I think that's probably true. I can't prove that. I'm suggestion that. I believe it. I believe that because I was told directly by people... The other reason I think that... When I hear lying..What's so important to them to get all these journalists to repeat these lies? Why? Why are they doing that? Why bother? Stories debunking claims about UAP's and UFO's. They are conspiracy theorists. Why would you attack someone for that?" What timing! I'm literally writing a thread on this topic right now and have been studying this in-depth! Tucker Carlson Shawn Ryan
14:36

Wow. Tucker just said that insiders insinuated to him that in many cases the "aliens" are more than likely Nephilim alluded to in Genesis 6 and every ancient religion. Genesis 6 refers to a spiritual union between angels and humankind that created giants. Every ancient religion has referred to these creatures, including Native American culture and the oldest Mesopotamian civilization. He says that the US government clearly possesses technology that is not publicly known about. He thinks that the government has been attempting to convince the populace that the supernatural is not real for the last eighty years because they are likely in bed with dark spiritual forces. What timing! I'm literally writing a thread on this topic right now and have been studying this in-depth! "All creation myths and one of them is that the belief that supernatural beings take physical form. They all believe that. The Greek Myths, Jesus. They aren't just shadows floating around. They are physical. They reproduce with people. Christianity, Jesus. That's what the story is. It's described in Genesis as well, in Genesis 6. It's not just the religion of the ancient Hebrews or the religion of the modern Christians. It's Hinduism as well...The American Indians. All the same. If every culture in the world is reaching the same conclusions about something. Maybe there is something there. Maybe it's not so crazy to think that what everyone else has always thought since the beginning of time which that there is this combination of human beings and the spiritual realm. I don't understand the specifics of it but I know that it has been written about since people have been writing... I think that's what we are looking at. It sounds out of the realm. It's not a crazy thing to think. I can't prove it.. What was it that led you to believe that? Talking to a lot of people.. I was really shocked by what credible people told me. I became completely satisfied that they were not lying... The belief that the real struggles are in the spiritual realm. That has been a constant belief since the beginning of history. Everyone has thought that except us in the West since 1945. I can't say that enough. Once you get perspective on this question. You are like, ok that may sound crazy to someone who thinks buying sh** on Amazon is the meaning of life...The fact that there is a lot of shit going on that we cannot see or measure with our senses. That is absolutely true.. The main thing they want you to believe is that the supernatural is not real. Then you have to ask yourself why? Why is that important to you? Why do you care if I think the supernatural is real? How dare you as my government try to get involved in my spiritual beliefs. Why has that been so important for 80 years? To convince me the supernatural is not real? My gut response is because it is real... They lie for a living. Reverse engineer their lies. Whatever they are telling is not true is the truth. What is the motive? The obvious answer is they are working for supernatural forces. I think that's probably true. I can't prove that. I'm suggestion that. I believe it. I believe that because I was told directly by people... The other reason I think that... When I hear lying..What's so important to them to get all these journalists to repeat these lies? Why? Why are they doing that? Why bother? Stories debunking claims about UAP's and UFO's. They are conspiracy theorists. Why would you attack someone for that?" What timing! I'm literally writing a thread on this topic right now and have been studying this in-depth! Tucker Carlson Shawn Ryan

Green Lives Matter

3,845,333 次观看 • 2 年前