正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Before a single stone was placed, they watched. Finding a location with a clear, unobstructed view of the horizon was the first step. Then came years of observation - tracking where the sun rose and set throughout the year, identifying the repeating pattern, and establishing the solar calendar encoded...

randallwcarlson's profile picture

Randall Carlson

169,502 subscribers

17,154 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Taken individually, any single ancient monument can be explained away as a feat of organized labor and brute force. Randall’s argument is that when you take the full picture in totality - the scale, the precision, the sacred geometry, and the global distribution of structures built from stones weighing ten tons or more - a different conclusion forces itself. There is a common system at work. These cultures shared a body of knowledge that we have forgotten, and that knowledge included something that made the manipulation of very large stones considerably easier than simple muscular effort would allow. The question Randall poses is direct - is the sacred geometry embedded in these structures merely an homage to a king's ego, a decorative impulse scaled up in stone? He dismisses that explanation not with contempt but with logic. The consistency of the system across cultures with no documented contact, the precision of the geometry, and the physical improbability of the construction methods conventionally proposed all point in the same direction. What was being built was not a monument to human vanity. It was an application of a knowledge system sophisticated enough to make the seemingly impossible routine - and whatever that system was, its loss is one of the most significant gaps in our understanding of what our predecessors were actually capable of.
0:35

Taken individually, any single ancient monument can be explained away as a feat of organized labor and brute force. Randall’s argument is that when you take the full picture in totality - the scale, the precision, the sacred geometry, and the global distribution of structures built from stones weighing ten tons or more - a different conclusion forces itself. There is a common system at work. These cultures shared a body of knowledge that we have forgotten, and that knowledge included something that made the manipulation of very large stones considerably easier than simple muscular effort would allow. The question Randall poses is direct - is the sacred geometry embedded in these structures merely an homage to a king's ego, a decorative impulse scaled up in stone? He dismisses that explanation not with contempt but with logic. The consistency of the system across cultures with no documented contact, the precision of the geometry, and the physical improbability of the construction methods conventionally proposed all point in the same direction. What was being built was not a monument to human vanity. It was an application of a knowledge system sophisticated enough to make the seemingly impossible routine - and whatever that system was, its loss is one of the most significant gaps in our understanding of what our predecessors were actually capable of.

Randall Carlson

14,080 次观看 • 3 个月前

In Newark, Ohio stands a monument aligned not to the sun—but to the moon. Its axis points to the extreme northern and southern moonrises, capturing the full 18.6-year lunar cycle with astonishing precision. Why would ancient people build such a massive structure just to follow the moon? What did they know that we’ve forgotten?
1:16

In Newark, Ohio stands a monument aligned not to the sun—but to the moon. Its axis points to the extreme northern and southern moonrises, capturing the full 18.6-year lunar cycle with astonishing precision. Why would ancient people build such a massive structure just to follow the moon? What did they know that we’ve forgotten?

Randall Carlson

38,660 次观看 • 1 年前

The ten Sumerian kings who reigned before the Great Flood are recorded as having ruled for a combined total of 432,000 years. Randall is clear that he doesn't take that figure literally - no individual king reigned for 43,200 years. However, the number itself is where the real argument begins. That same numerical sequence is embedded throughout the way modern civilization measures time and space. The moon's diameter is 2,160 miles - precisely half of 4,320, and double 1,080. The recurrence of that figure across Sumerian kingship lists and contemporary astronomical measurement is not coincidental. What Randall draws attention to next is the origin of the mile itself. It is not an arbitrary unit. It derives ultimately from human anatomy and the geometric proportions of the human body - which connects it to the same tradition of sacred geometry and human-cosmic correspondence that Randall traces across multiple ancient cultures. The implication is significant. If the numbers embedded in Sumerian myth are the same numbers encoded in our most basic units of measurement, and if those units trace back to human geometry, then the knowledge system that produced the Sumerian king lists and the one that produced our measurement conventions may share a common and much older source.
0:49

The ten Sumerian kings who reigned before the Great Flood are recorded as having ruled for a combined total of 432,000 years. Randall is clear that he doesn't take that figure literally - no individual king reigned for 43,200 years. However, the number itself is where the real argument begins. That same numerical sequence is embedded throughout the way modern civilization measures time and space. The moon's diameter is 2,160 miles - precisely half of 4,320, and double 1,080. The recurrence of that figure across Sumerian kingship lists and contemporary astronomical measurement is not coincidental. What Randall draws attention to next is the origin of the mile itself. It is not an arbitrary unit. It derives ultimately from human anatomy and the geometric proportions of the human body - which connects it to the same tradition of sacred geometry and human-cosmic correspondence that Randall traces across multiple ancient cultures. The implication is significant. If the numbers embedded in Sumerian myth are the same numbers encoded in our most basic units of measurement, and if those units trace back to human geometry, then the knowledge system that produced the Sumerian king lists and the one that produced our measurement conventions may share a common and much older source.

Randall Carlson

101,602 次观看 • 3 个月前

The Freemasons did not invent the title of Great Architect for God arbitrarily. Randall traces it to a specific and ancient understanding - that the universe was built according to geometry, that all of creation carries that geometry inherently within it, and that the role of the master builder was not to express personal creativity but to replicate the processes by which God constructed reality itself. The grand geometric mean - another name Randall notes the Freemasons apply to the divine - points to the same conclusion. Mathematics and divinity were never separate categories in this tradition. They were the same thing viewed from different angles. What Randall finds most compelling is the point at which observation overtakes skepticism. The geometry is there. It appears in the proportions of living organisms, in the structure of galaxies, in the dimensions of ancient monuments, and in the relationships between celestial bodies. Randall’s position is straightforward - there is a threshold beyond which dismissing this as coincidence is no longer intellectually honest. Once you begin looking for the geometry of creation, it becomes impossible to stop finding it. The ancient master builders understood that - and everything they built was a deliberate act of alignment with a geometric order they believed was not invented by human minds but discovered within a universe that was already built that way from the beginning.
0:33

The Freemasons did not invent the title of Great Architect for God arbitrarily. Randall traces it to a specific and ancient understanding - that the universe was built according to geometry, that all of creation carries that geometry inherently within it, and that the role of the master builder was not to express personal creativity but to replicate the processes by which God constructed reality itself. The grand geometric mean - another name Randall notes the Freemasons apply to the divine - points to the same conclusion. Mathematics and divinity were never separate categories in this tradition. They were the same thing viewed from different angles. What Randall finds most compelling is the point at which observation overtakes skepticism. The geometry is there. It appears in the proportions of living organisms, in the structure of galaxies, in the dimensions of ancient monuments, and in the relationships between celestial bodies. Randall’s position is straightforward - there is a threshold beyond which dismissing this as coincidence is no longer intellectually honest. Once you begin looking for the geometry of creation, it becomes impossible to stop finding it. The ancient master builders understood that - and everything they built was a deliberate act of alignment with a geometric order they believed was not invented by human minds but discovered within a universe that was already built that way from the beginning.

Randall Carlson

11,848 次观看 • 3 个月前

Across the ancient world, from the Celts to the Maya, from Egypt to Japan, cultures celebrated a Festival of the Dead at the same moment of the year: late October into early November. Different continents, different languages, same date. And many of these traditions include a startling claim...that on this night, something real moved across the sky at midnight, something tied to the belief that the souls of the departed could return and interact with the living. When so many civilizations align on the same night and the same phenomenon, it raises a deeper question: what were they all seeing?
1:02

Across the ancient world, from the Celts to the Maya, from Egypt to Japan, cultures celebrated a Festival of the Dead at the same moment of the year: late October into early November. Different continents, different languages, same date. And many of these traditions include a startling claim...that on this night, something real moved across the sky at midnight, something tied to the belief that the souls of the departed could return and interact with the living. When so many civilizations align on the same night and the same phenomenon, it raises a deeper question: what were they all seeing?

Randall Carlson

28,485 次观看 • 7 个月前

2025 was an extremely difficult year. Ending it in London with the cast and crew of The Pendragon Cycle was one of the most restorative occasions of my life. This unbelievable group of artists not only fought to make our show, they embodied the spirit of the show in how they fought for each other. We set out to make a great show. To elevate the true and the good honestly and without pandering. To honor ourselves and to honor you. What a privilege it is to finally share the fruit of that effort with you. The Pendragon Cycle: Rise of the Merlin is now streaming DailyWire+ There is a golden realm of light, my friends...
5:48

2025 was an extremely difficult year. Ending it in London with the cast and crew of The Pendragon Cycle was one of the most restorative occasions of my life. This unbelievable group of artists not only fought to make our show, they embodied the spirit of the show in how they fought for each other. We set out to make a great show. To elevate the true and the good honestly and without pandering. To honor ourselves and to honor you. What a privilege it is to finally share the fruit of that effort with you. The Pendragon Cycle: Rise of the Merlin is now streaming DailyWire+ There is a golden realm of light, my friends...

Jeremy Boreing

87,254 次观看 • 5 个月前

“We literally, with AI, have a technology that transfers sand into thought.” Marc Andreessen on why AI is the philosopher’s stone: “The early scientists, including Isaac Newton, were super obsessed with this concept of alchemy.” “Alchemy was the transmutation of lead into gold. Which meant the transmutation of something that was very common, which was lead, into something that was very rare and valuable, which was gold.” “The most common thing in the world, which is sand, converted into the most rare thing in the world, which is thought.” “And so AI is the philosopher’s stone.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Lenny's Podcast with Lenny Rachitsky
1:14

“We literally, with AI, have a technology that transfers sand into thought.” Marc Andreessen on why AI is the philosopher’s stone: “The early scientists, including Isaac Newton, were super obsessed with this concept of alchemy.” “Alchemy was the transmutation of lead into gold. Which meant the transmutation of something that was very common, which was lead, into something that was very rare and valuable, which was gold.” “The most common thing in the world, which is sand, converted into the most rare thing in the world, which is thought.” “And so AI is the philosopher’s stone.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Lenny's Podcast with Lenny Rachitsky

a16z

185,303 次观看 • 5 个月前

From Egypt and Sumer to the Maya, Hopi, Greeks, and builders of Angkor Wat, cultures across the world preserved versions of a ~25,000-year cycle. Different names, different symbols... same observation. The Great Year wasn’t myth. It was astronomy, recorded by civilizations watching the sky over millennia.
0:52

From Egypt and Sumer to the Maya, Hopi, Greeks, and builders of Angkor Wat, cultures across the world preserved versions of a ~25,000-year cycle. Different names, different symbols... same observation. The Great Year wasn’t myth. It was astronomy, recorded by civilizations watching the sky over millennia.

Randall Carlson

17,716 次观看 • 6 个月前

From being forced to breed with its own sibling before it was even a year old, to giving birth to puppies and then losing every single one of them on the very same day, and being abandoned by its owner the next day. At that point, it was terrified and heartbroken. Then they rescued her 💖 People often see the happy moments they share here, but this is the other side of dog rescue work — the heartbreaking stories, the trauma, and the fear these dogs have endured before finally finding a better life.
0:21

From being forced to breed with its own sibling before it was even a year old, to giving birth to puppies and then losing every single one of them on the very same day, and being abandoned by its owner the next day. At that point, it was terrified and heartbroken. Then they rescued her 💖 People often see the happy moments they share here, but this is the other side of dog rescue work — the heartbreaking stories, the trauma, and the fear these dogs have endured before finally finding a better life.

Beauty of music and nature 🌺🌺

175,027 次观看 • 1 个月前

In 1901, divers pulled a lump of corroded bronze out of a two thousand year old shipwreck. It took the next century to understand what it was, and the answer broke the timeline of human history. It's called the Antikythera Mechanism, and it is the oldest known computer on earth. It was built by the ancient Greeks, around 100 BC, and it should not exist. Nothing else of its sophistication would appear anywhere in the world for more than a thousand years after it... It was found by sponge divers off the Greek island of Antikythera, in the wreck of a trading ship that had sunk in the first century BC, surrounded by bronze statues and pottery. The corroded fragments looked like nothing at first, and sat largely ignored in a museum in Athens. Only over the following decades, and especially with modern X-ray and CT scanning in our own century, did researchers finally see inside it. What they found was a machine. Behind its bronze face was a system of at least thirty interlocking precision gears, cut and arranged with a sophistication that would not be matched until the geared astronomical clocks of medieval Europe, well over a thousand years later. It was, in the words of the team that studied it, a mechanical computer that worked by turning astronomical theory into bronze... And it did extraordinary things. You turned a hand crank on the side, and the mechanism calculated the positions of the sun, the moon, and the five planets the Greeks knew. It tracked the phases of the moon. It predicted solar and lunar eclipses years in advance. It even displayed the four-year cycle of the ancient Olympic Games. A person standing in the ancient world could set this device to a date and watch the heavens be calculated in front of them, by gears, by hand. Roughly a third of the original survives, in 82 corroded fragments. We still do not know who designed it, or how a civilization without anything resembling industrial machinery achieved this level of precision engineering. What is certain is that it was not a one-off accident. A device this refined implies a tradition behind it, generations of knowledge and earlier attempts that have been lost completely. The Antikythera Mechanism is proof of how much the ancient world knew, and how much of what human beings have achieved has simply vanished without a trace, leaving us to stumble on a single piece of it at the bottom of the sea...
1:02

In 1901, divers pulled a lump of corroded bronze out of a two thousand year old shipwreck. It took the next century to understand what it was, and the answer broke the timeline of human history. It's called the Antikythera Mechanism, and it is the oldest known computer on earth. It was built by the ancient Greeks, around 100 BC, and it should not exist. Nothing else of its sophistication would appear anywhere in the world for more than a thousand years after it... It was found by sponge divers off the Greek island of Antikythera, in the wreck of a trading ship that had sunk in the first century BC, surrounded by bronze statues and pottery. The corroded fragments looked like nothing at first, and sat largely ignored in a museum in Athens. Only over the following decades, and especially with modern X-ray and CT scanning in our own century, did researchers finally see inside it. What they found was a machine. Behind its bronze face was a system of at least thirty interlocking precision gears, cut and arranged with a sophistication that would not be matched until the geared astronomical clocks of medieval Europe, well over a thousand years later. It was, in the words of the team that studied it, a mechanical computer that worked by turning astronomical theory into bronze... And it did extraordinary things. You turned a hand crank on the side, and the mechanism calculated the positions of the sun, the moon, and the five planets the Greeks knew. It tracked the phases of the moon. It predicted solar and lunar eclipses years in advance. It even displayed the four-year cycle of the ancient Olympic Games. A person standing in the ancient world could set this device to a date and watch the heavens be calculated in front of them, by gears, by hand. Roughly a third of the original survives, in 82 corroded fragments. We still do not know who designed it, or how a civilization without anything resembling industrial machinery achieved this level of precision engineering. What is certain is that it was not a one-off accident. A device this refined implies a tradition behind it, generations of knowledge and earlier attempts that have been lost completely. The Antikythera Mechanism is proof of how much the ancient world knew, and how much of what human beings have achieved has simply vanished without a trace, leaving us to stumble on a single piece of it at the bottom of the sea...

James Lucas

240,632 次观看 • 2 天前

Bret Weinstein suspects ancient advanced civilizations existed—and got wiped out. “The evidence is far too compelling to dismiss.” Joe Rogan: “I’ve been really fascinated by the Sumerian King List.” “They’re the ones that have all this crazy stuff with the Anunnaki.” “It’s this list of people who ran the Earth for tens of thousands of years.” “Their reign was like tens of thousands of years, and then there’s this huge flood.” “Afterwards, the timelines become way more—it’s like, he was a king for 50 years.” “They have it documented to like eight kings over the entire course of their civilization, including the places that these kings ruled that actually exist.” “These are ancient cities that are actually built on top of even more ancient cities.” “And they had an understanding of stuff that was way beyond what we thought they were capable of.” “They have Pythagoras’ theorem 1,000 years before Pythagoras.” Bret Weinstein: “There is this increasingly fascinating thread about a recurrent disaster cycle, and the possibility that sophisticated civilizations get erased and that we rediscover.” Joe Rogan Bret Weinstein
2:39

Bret Weinstein suspects ancient advanced civilizations existed—and got wiped out. “The evidence is far too compelling to dismiss.” Joe Rogan: “I’ve been really fascinated by the Sumerian King List.” “They’re the ones that have all this crazy stuff with the Anunnaki.” “It’s this list of people who ran the Earth for tens of thousands of years.” “Their reign was like tens of thousands of years, and then there’s this huge flood.” “Afterwards, the timelines become way more—it’s like, he was a king for 50 years.” “They have it documented to like eight kings over the entire course of their civilization, including the places that these kings ruled that actually exist.” “These are ancient cities that are actually built on top of even more ancient cities.” “And they had an understanding of stuff that was way beyond what we thought they were capable of.” “They have Pythagoras’ theorem 1,000 years before Pythagoras.” Bret Weinstein: “There is this increasingly fascinating thread about a recurrent disaster cycle, and the possibility that sophisticated civilizations get erased and that we rediscover.” Joe Rogan Bret Weinstein

Holden Culotta

664,768 次观看 • 7 个月前

The explanation that the pyramids were built by lifting stones weighing hundreds of thousands of pounds with sticks has, Shawn Ryan suggests, run its course. Few people with any serious engagement with the evidence are still buying it - and yet it persists in educational systems as though the question were settled. Shawn finds that persistence almost more puzzling than the construction mystery itself. The scale of the problem becomes clear when you stop treating each site as an isolated anomaly. Randall draws on his own experience moving heavy weights in construction - noting that even a single ton beam requires cranes and front end loaders today - and applies that practical knowledge directly to the ancient record. The ancient world was moving stones of 100, 200 tons and beyond, not once at a single location but repeatedly, across every inhabited continent, in cultures with no documented contact with one another. Stonehenge, Easter Island, Machu Picchu, and the pyramids are not separate puzzles with separate solutions. They are the same question asked in different languages - and the answer, Randall argues, is one that the stick and ramp theory was never equipped to provide.
1:04

The explanation that the pyramids were built by lifting stones weighing hundreds of thousands of pounds with sticks has, Shawn Ryan suggests, run its course. Few people with any serious engagement with the evidence are still buying it - and yet it persists in educational systems as though the question were settled. Shawn finds that persistence almost more puzzling than the construction mystery itself. The scale of the problem becomes clear when you stop treating each site as an isolated anomaly. Randall draws on his own experience moving heavy weights in construction - noting that even a single ton beam requires cranes and front end loaders today - and applies that practical knowledge directly to the ancient record. The ancient world was moving stones of 100, 200 tons and beyond, not once at a single location but repeatedly, across every inhabited continent, in cultures with no documented contact with one another. Stonehenge, Easter Island, Machu Picchu, and the pyramids are not separate puzzles with separate solutions. They are the same question asked in different languages - and the answer, Randall argues, is one that the stick and ramp theory was never equipped to provide.

Randall Carlson

41,347 次观看 • 3 个月前

What we see at Giza today is not what was built. Randall makes that point plainly - what remains is the ruin of something far more impressive. Khufu's pyramid was originally sheathed in highly polished white limestone, with extraordinarily tight joinery between every individual block. Approaching across the landscape - which Randall notes may not even have been desert at the time - the structure would have blazed white in the distance. The monument we study today is stripped of that outer casing entirely, leaving only the core that was never meant to be seen. That visual reframing matters because it resets the question of who built these structures and why. Randall is careful with the conventional chronology - Djoser's pyramid as the first prototype, Khufu's arriving a couple of generations later - but he holds it loosely, noting that these sequences reflect some theories more than settled fact. The deeper question he is circling is the identity of the antecedent civilization that may have been responsible. A structure precise enough to demand tight-jointed polished limestone casing across its entire surface was not built by a civilization in its infancy. It was built by one that had already mastered everything required to produce it.
1:03

What we see at Giza today is not what was built. Randall makes that point plainly - what remains is the ruin of something far more impressive. Khufu's pyramid was originally sheathed in highly polished white limestone, with extraordinarily tight joinery between every individual block. Approaching across the landscape - which Randall notes may not even have been desert at the time - the structure would have blazed white in the distance. The monument we study today is stripped of that outer casing entirely, leaving only the core that was never meant to be seen. That visual reframing matters because it resets the question of who built these structures and why. Randall is careful with the conventional chronology - Djoser's pyramid as the first prototype, Khufu's arriving a couple of generations later - but he holds it loosely, noting that these sequences reflect some theories more than settled fact. The deeper question he is circling is the identity of the antecedent civilization that may have been responsible. A structure precise enough to demand tight-jointed polished limestone casing across its entire surface was not built by a civilization in its infancy. It was built by one that had already mastered everything required to produce it.

Randall Carlson

52,324 次观看 • 4 个月前

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.
0:45

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.

Randall Carlson

11,737 次观看 • 3 个月前

📁 Fei-Fei Li, one of the most influential AI scientists in the world, argues that common sense is not as mysterious as we think. Much of it is already encoded in language, distilled through thousands of years of human communication. When an AI places the sun at the top of a drawing, it does not need deep physics, it is learning shared patterns. In her view, common sense can be learned, and in many ways an AI is not so different from a five year old child.
1:15

📁 Fei-Fei Li, one of the most influential AI scientists in the world, argues that common sense is not as mysterious as we think. Much of it is already encoded in language, distilled through thousands of years of human communication. When an AI places the sun at the top of a drawing, it does not need deep physics, it is learning shared patterns. In her view, common sense can be learned, and in many ways an AI is not so different from a five year old child.

Jon Hernandez

20,744 次观看 • 5 个月前

What if sacred architecture was modeled after the solar system itself? The layout of the outer planets isn’t random—it allowed comets to deliver water and organics that made life possible on Earth. Now here’s the twist: Ancient builders encoded that cosmic geometry into temples, monuments—even the blueprint of the New Jerusalem. Coincidence? Or cosmic knowledge hidden in stone?
0:52

What if sacred architecture was modeled after the solar system itself? The layout of the outer planets isn’t random—it allowed comets to deliver water and organics that made life possible on Earth. Now here’s the twist: Ancient builders encoded that cosmic geometry into temples, monuments—even the blueprint of the New Jerusalem. Coincidence? Or cosmic knowledge hidden in stone?

Randall Carlson

24,639 次观看 • 1 年前

The inch derives from the width of a human thumb. The foot from the length of a human foot. The pace, the cubit, the furlong - each unit in the ancient measurement system traces back to a dimension of the human body, connecting the geometry of human anatomy directly to the geometry of the built world. Randall makes this concrete and physical - he has laid out 660 feet in an open field, marked a single inch at one end, and demonstrated the relationship firsthand. These are not abstract units. They are embodied ones. The ratio Randall arrives at is where the argument crystallizes. The furlong is to the inch as the Earth is to a mile. That relationship is not a coincidence of historical accident - it is evidence of a measurement system deliberately constructed to encode the dimensions of the planet into the units of human scale. The same system that begins with the width of a thumb ends with the circumference of the Earth, and every unit in between maintains a precise proportional relationship to both. Randall’s broader argument throughout his research converges here - the ancient world did not measure things arbitrarily. It built a system in which the human body, the sacred structure, and the planet itself were all expressions of the same underlying geometric order.
0:45

The inch derives from the width of a human thumb. The foot from the length of a human foot. The pace, the cubit, the furlong - each unit in the ancient measurement system traces back to a dimension of the human body, connecting the geometry of human anatomy directly to the geometry of the built world. Randall makes this concrete and physical - he has laid out 660 feet in an open field, marked a single inch at one end, and demonstrated the relationship firsthand. These are not abstract units. They are embodied ones. The ratio Randall arrives at is where the argument crystallizes. The furlong is to the inch as the Earth is to a mile. That relationship is not a coincidence of historical accident - it is evidence of a measurement system deliberately constructed to encode the dimensions of the planet into the units of human scale. The same system that begins with the width of a thumb ends with the circumference of the Earth, and every unit in between maintains a precise proportional relationship to both. Randall’s broader argument throughout his research converges here - the ancient world did not measure things arbitrarily. It built a system in which the human body, the sacred structure, and the planet itself were all expressions of the same underlying geometric order.

Randall Carlson

24,317 次观看 • 3 个月前

The assumption that Earth operates as a largely self-contained system - affected by its own geology, its own climate cycles, its own biological processes - is one Randall argues we need to outgrow. This planet is embedded in a cosmic environment, and the evidence that the cosmic domain impinges on the terrestrial far more frequently than previously imagined is now beyond ambiguity. The ancient peoples who were obsessed with the sky were not engaged in superstition. They were paying attention to something that modern science is only now catching up to. The solar constant - the assumed stability of energy output from the sun - is not nearly as constant as the name implies. Randall argues that a significant portion of the changes happening on Earth, changes that are routinely attributed to purely terrestrial causes, are connected to fluctuations and events in the cosmic domain of which Earth is a part. The sky that ancient cultures watched with such intensity was not a backdrop to human history. It was an active participant in it - and Randall argues that thinking cosmically is not an abstract philosophical exercise. It is the only framework large enough to accurately account for what has been happening on this planet throughout human history and what continues to happen now. Spots are limited - click here to join Randall on his upcoming Finger Lakes tour!
0:48

The assumption that Earth operates as a largely self-contained system - affected by its own geology, its own climate cycles, its own biological processes - is one Randall argues we need to outgrow. This planet is embedded in a cosmic environment, and the evidence that the cosmic domain impinges on the terrestrial far more frequently than previously imagined is now beyond ambiguity. The ancient peoples who were obsessed with the sky were not engaged in superstition. They were paying attention to something that modern science is only now catching up to. The solar constant - the assumed stability of energy output from the sun - is not nearly as constant as the name implies. Randall argues that a significant portion of the changes happening on Earth, changes that are routinely attributed to purely terrestrial causes, are connected to fluctuations and events in the cosmic domain of which Earth is a part. The sky that ancient cultures watched with such intensity was not a backdrop to human history. It was an active participant in it - and Randall argues that thinking cosmically is not an abstract philosophical exercise. It is the only framework large enough to accurately account for what has been happening on this planet throughout human history and what continues to happen now. Spots are limited - click here to join Randall on his upcoming Finger Lakes tour!

Randall Carlson

14,458 次观看 • 3 个月前

So here’s the deal: Bledsoe says an exact, rare alignment will occur on April 5, 2026—on Easter—and that Regulus will align with the gaze of the Sphinx on the horizon. That’s in 10 days from today. But Regulus does not align with the gaze of the Sphinx on Easter in 2026. That happened 12,000 years ago; today, Regulus and Leo rise in autumn. So I decided to search for the rare alignment, and it happens to be one day after Rosh Hashanah, the start of the new year in the Jewish calendar. On that date, or the first day of the Jewish new year, a very rare alignment involving multiple planets inside the constellation of Virgo will occur. There will be an occultation of Venus (Hathor) by the Moon. Venus is also the ruler of the constellation of Taurus, the Bull (in Egypt, the bull Apis). The lady Virgo will be clothed with the Sun at her head, and the Moon and Venus will be at her feet. Regulus will rise first on the horizon and align with the gaze of the Sphinx, and to make it more interesting, the planet that rules Virgo, Mercury, will also be in the same constellation. Mercury is connected to Thoth/Hermes.
1:47

So here’s the deal: Bledsoe says an exact, rare alignment will occur on April 5, 2026—on Easter—and that Regulus will align with the gaze of the Sphinx on the horizon. That’s in 10 days from today. But Regulus does not align with the gaze of the Sphinx on Easter in 2026. That happened 12,000 years ago; today, Regulus and Leo rise in autumn. So I decided to search for the rare alignment, and it happens to be one day after Rosh Hashanah, the start of the new year in the Jewish calendar. On that date, or the first day of the Jewish new year, a very rare alignment involving multiple planets inside the constellation of Virgo will occur. There will be an occultation of Venus (Hathor) by the Moon. Venus is also the ruler of the constellation of Taurus, the Bull (in Egypt, the bull Apis). The lady Virgo will be clothed with the Sun at her head, and the Moon and Venus will be at her feet. Regulus will rise first on the horizon and align with the gaze of the Sphinx, and to make it more interesting, the planet that rules Virgo, Mercury, will also be in the same constellation. Mercury is connected to Thoth/Hermes.

Open Minded Approach

228,937 次观看 • 3 个月前

The news cycle is dominated by division and cynicism, but I'm here to tell you that America is STILL leading the way with bold ideas 250 years later. NASA is reminding us all of that. This is one of the BEST stories of the entire year. Every American should be proud.
1:54

The news cycle is dominated by division and cynicism, but I'm here to tell you that America is STILL leading the way with bold ideas 250 years later. NASA is reminding us all of that. This is one of the BEST stories of the entire year. Every American should be proud.

Scott Jennings

45,745 次观看 • 1 个月前