Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

BEFORE: 2,000 notes. Zero I could find. Inbox full of guilt. AFTER: Inbox empty every morning. Every note linked. Weekly review written for me. Same notes. Different brain. The difference is Opus 5.5 and one CLAUDE. md file. How to set it up from scratch 👇

CyrilXBT

197,461 subscribers

31,206 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

5 Comments

Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack1 day ago

@cyrilXBT adding a weekly prep session helps too. 15 mins every Friday to organize new notes saves tons of time.

晚晚1 day ago

同一堆笔记，关键是终于有人替你整理了

Xa Hoàng Nguyên1 day ago

This person's talent is genuinely underrated

Chen1 day ago

the 2000 unfindable notes hit way too close to home. i’d sign up just to lose the inbox guilt.

风女也要戴大帽1 day ago

Curious how you handle conflict resolution when two notes make contradictory claims about the same topic.

Related Videos

6 commands replaced my entire productivity stack. /process → empties my inbox /connect → finds links I missed /review → tells me what I forgot /ask → answers from MY notes /draft → turns notes into posts /decide → turns notes into decisions One Obsidian vault. One Opus 5.5. Full course with every prompt below. Save this.

6 commands replaced my entire productivity stack. /process → empties my inbox /connect → finds links I missed /review → tells me what I forgot /ask → answers from MY notes /draft → turns notes into posts /decide → turns notes into decisions One Obsidian vault. One Opus 5.5. Full course with every prompt below. Save this.

CyrilXBT

37,321 views • 1 day ago

POV: your notes finally talk back "You wrote about this exact problem in March." "These 3 notes contradict each other." "You promised Sam a follow up 9 days ago." "This idea has 14 links and you never posted it." That's Opus 5.5 running a second brain. How to build it in under an hour 👇

POV: your notes finally talk back "You wrote about this exact problem in March." "These 3 notes contradict each other." "You promised Sam a follow up 9 days ago." "This idea has 14 links and you never posted it." That's Opus 5.5 running a second brain. How to build it in under an hour 👇

CyrilXBT

33,544 views • 1 day ago

Six months ago my Obsidian vault had 2,000 notes and I could not find anything. I rebuilt the entire structure in one afternoon using this exact system. I have not lost a single idea since. The people who set this up today will wonder how they ever worked without it.

Six months ago my Obsidian vault had 2,000 notes and I could not find anything. I rebuilt the entire structure in one afternoon using this exact system. I have not lost a single idea since. The people who set this up today will wonder how they ever worked without it.

CyrilXBT

155,810 views • 4 months ago

"how do you remember everything you read?" I don't. Claude does. every article, PDF, and transcript goes into one Obsidian folder. Claude reads it, breaks it into atomic notes, links it to the rest. I just ask. that's Karpathy's second-brain method. three folders, one file. full guide below.

"how do you remember everything you read?" I don't. Claude does. every article, PDF, and transcript goes into one Obsidian folder. Claude reads it, breaks it into atomic notes, links it to the rest. I just ask. that's Karpathy's second-brain method. three folders, one file. full guide below.

Kirill

88,119 views • 1 month ago

Obsidian plus Hermes Agent equals a system that thinks, remembers, and runs your life. Works while you sleep. Vault holds the knowledge. Hermes reads it. Claude reasons across it. Outputs land back in the vault as new notes. Every morning brief grounded in your actual projects. Every inbox processed automatically. Every week synthesized without effort. The personal operating system that compounds forever. Read this and Bookmark it now.

Obsidian plus Hermes Agent equals a system that thinks, remembers, and runs your life. Works while you sleep. Vault holds the knowledge. Hermes reads it. Claude reasons across it. Outputs land back in the vault as new notes. Every morning brief grounded in your actual projects. Every inbox processed automatically. Every week synthesized without effort. The personal operating system that compounds forever. Read this and Bookmark it now.

CyrilXBT

43,403 views • 4 months ago

$This is F**king dangerous Someone figured out how to get dramatically sharper reasoning out of Opus 4.8 with one setup. Here is how: Ask Claude to write you an "operating manual" for how it should reason through your work Create a new Claude Project and paste that .md into the Project instructions Run Opus 4.8 on High or Max effort Now the model reasons against a real framework instead of improvising every response. Same model. Far better output. And Opus 4.8 already costs a fraction of Fable 5. Save and bookmark this. Follow CyrilXBT$

This is F**king dangerous Someone figured out how to get dramatically sharper reasoning out of Opus 4.8 with one setup. Here is how: Ask Claude to write you an "operating manual" for how it should reason through your work Create a new Claude Project and paste that .md into the Project instructions Run Opus 4.8 on High or Max effort Now the model reasons against a real framework instead of improvising every response. Same model. Far better output. And Opus 4.8 already costs a fraction of Fable 5. Save and bookmark this. Follow CyrilXBT

CyrilXBT

198,085 views • 2 months ago

MOST PEOPLE DOWNLOAD OBSIDIAN AND USE NOTION AGAIN BY WEEK THREE. Not because Obsidian is hard. Because nobody gave them the complete picture before they started building. This masterclass is that complete picture. Empty vault → a second brain that compounds every week. Philosophy. Architecture. Linking. Daily notes. Maps of Content. Claude integration. Automated workflows. And the daily practice that makes it actually stick. Everything in one guide. Read this and bookmark it now.

MOST PEOPLE DOWNLOAD OBSIDIAN AND USE NOTION AGAIN BY WEEK THREE. Not because Obsidian is hard. Because nobody gave them the complete picture before they started building. This masterclass is that complete picture. Empty vault → a second brain that compounds every week. Philosophy. Architecture. Linking. Daily notes. Maps of Content. Claude integration. Automated workflows. And the daily practice that makes it actually stick. Everything in one guide. Read this and bookmark it now.

CyrilXBT

31,207 views • 3 months ago

open Claude Code type a prompt. one model does everything. congrats, you just used 20% of it meanwhile I built 30 sub-agents one reviews my code before commit one finds bugs and writes the patch one drafts cold emails from one line one triages my inbox before I wake up one logs every decision so future me knows why each agent = one markdown file in .claude/agents/ most Claude Code users don't even know this exists. all 30 files in the article. ready to copy. the article has every file. every prompt. just copy and run.

open Claude Code type a prompt. one model does everything. congrats, you just used 20% of it meanwhile I built 30 sub-agents one reviews my code before commit one finds bugs and writes the patch one drafts cold emails from one line one triages my inbox before I wake up one logs every decision so future me knows why each agent = one markdown file in .claude/agents/ most Claude Code users don't even know this exists. all 30 files in the article. ready to copy. the article has every file. every prompt. just copy and run.

Nav Toor

71,467 views • 5 months ago

Jev + Opus 5.5 is the most underrated setup in AI right now, and i don't get why nobody's talking about it. I stopped letting Opus make every small decision in my agents. Jev makes them now. My Opus bill dropped ~500% on the same tasks, same results. Here's what Jev handles: - which files and notes to load before Opus sees anything - which effort level each task actually needs - what to do when a tool fails - which tests to run, and when to stop Opus only gets called for the hard reasoning. Every decision is a typed result the host checks before it runs. The exact prompt to set this up in your workflow is below.

Jev + Opus 5.5 is the most underrated setup in AI right now, and i don't get why nobody's talking about it. I stopped letting Opus make every small decision in my agents. Jev makes them now. My Opus bill dropped ~500% on the same tasks, same results. Here's what Jev handles: - which files and notes to load before Opus sees anything - which effort level each task actually needs - what to do when a tool fails - which tests to run, and when to stop Opus only gets called for the hard reasoning. Every decision is a typed result the host checks before it runs. The exact prompt to set this up in your workflow is below.

Anatoli Kopadze

74,966 views • 8 days ago

A CHINESE DEVELOPER TURNED AI INTO A SECOND BRAIN THAT NEVER FORGETS. And here's exactly how he did it — works with any AI, Claude, Kimi, or Gemini. Every source you add makes the whole thing sharper — including the notes from months ago. Set it up once in 25 minutes. Never start from an empty chat again. Full A–Z guide below.

A CHINESE DEVELOPER TURNED AI INTO A SECOND BRAIN THAT NEVER FORGETS. And here's exactly how he did it — works with any AI, Claude, Kimi, or Gemini. Every source you add makes the whole thing sharper — including the notes from months ago. Set it up once in 25 minutes. Never start from an empty chat again. Full A–Z guide below.

Kirill

44,070 views • 3 months ago

CLAUDE JUST TURNED OBSIDIAN INTO A BRAIN THAT NEVER FORGETS (FOR $0) Someone connected Claude straight to their Obsidian vault. Now the AI reads and writes every note they own. Every client, every idea, every project. Instant recall. Runs on Claude + Obsidian. One evening. Zero code. The numbers are insane: - Notion AI: $10/month forever - A "second brain" course: $500 to $2,000 - An assistant to organize your notes: $3,000/month - This setup: $0 - Time to build: one evening - Skill required: copy the steps The opportunity is even wilder: People sell Notion "second brain" templates for $99 to $499. You just built something better for free, and it never forgets. One free vault can hold the entire memory of your business: clients, content, SOPs, ideas. One person + Claude + Obsidian + one evening = an infinite memory that never forgets. Save and watch the clip.

CLAUDE JUST TURNED OBSIDIAN INTO A BRAIN THAT NEVER FORGETS (FOR $0) Someone connected Claude straight to their Obsidian vault. Now the AI reads and writes every note they own. Every client, every idea, every project. Instant recall. Runs on Claude + Obsidian. One evening. Zero code. The numbers are insane: - Notion AI: $10/month forever - A "second brain" course: $500 to $2,000 - An assistant to organize your notes: $3,000/month - This setup: $0 - Time to build: one evening - Skill required: copy the steps The opportunity is even wilder: People sell Notion "second brain" templates for $99 to $499. You just built something better for free, and it never forgets. One free vault can hold the entire memory of your business: clients, content, SOPs, ideas. One person + Claude + Obsidian + one evening = an infinite memory that never forgets. Save and watch the clip.

shmidt

57,347 views • 3 months ago

OBSIDIAN PLUS HERMES AGENT IS THE MOST POWERFUL PERSONAL OPERATING SYSTEM AVAILABLE RIGHT NOW AND ALMOST NOBODY HAS BUILT IT YET. Obsidian holds everything you know permanently. Hermes reads it, reasons across it, and runs your most important workflows automatically. Morning briefs generated from your actual vault. Inbox processed every evening without you touching it. Project health monitored every Monday. Weekly synthesis ready every Sunday. One system. Thinks. Remembers. Runs your life. Read this and Bookmark it now.

OBSIDIAN PLUS HERMES AGENT IS THE MOST POWERFUL PERSONAL OPERATING SYSTEM AVAILABLE RIGHT NOW AND ALMOST NOBODY HAS BUILT IT YET. Obsidian holds everything you know permanently. Hermes reads it, reasons across it, and runs your most important workflows automatically. Morning briefs generated from your actual vault. Inbox processed every evening without you touching it. Project health monitored every Monday. Weekly synthesis ready every Sunday. One system. Thinks. Remembers. Runs your life. Read this and Bookmark it now.

CyrilXBT

122,498 views • 4 months ago

THIS GUY TURNED ONE OBSIDIAN VAULT INTO A SHARED BRAIN FOR 5 CLAUDE AGENTS BUILT TO HANDLE 80% OF A SOLO DEVELOPER’S WORK. 00:03 he zooms out and hundreds of connected notes appear on screen. it is the perfect visual for Claude working from one shared project memory instead of starting from zero every session. most developers give Claude 1 file and 1 prompt. this setup gives it the architecture, coding rules, tests, client briefs, and previous decisions before it writes anything. obsidian becomes the memory layer, storing everything in markdown files Claude can read alongside the codebase. every agent works from the same context instead of repeating the same questions. then 5 specialists split the job. one researches, one plans, one codes, one reviews, and one deploys while the developer only controls the important decisions. one vault, 5 agents, 2 model tiers, and a $50 to $150 monthly stack can turn Claude from a chatbot into a small development team.

THIS GUY TURNED ONE OBSIDIAN VAULT INTO A SHARED BRAIN FOR 5 CLAUDE AGENTS BUILT TO HANDLE 80% OF A SOLO DEVELOPER’S WORK. 00:03 he zooms out and hundreds of connected notes appear on screen. it is the perfect visual for Claude working from one shared project memory instead of starting from zero every session. most developers give Claude 1 file and 1 prompt. this setup gives it the architecture, coding rules, tests, client briefs, and previous decisions before it writes anything. obsidian becomes the memory layer, storing everything in markdown files Claude can read alongside the codebase. every agent works from the same context instead of repeating the same questions. then 5 specialists split the job. one researches, one plans, one codes, one reviews, and one deploys while the developer only controls the important decisions. one vault, 5 agents, 2 model tiers, and a $50 to $150 monthly stack can turn Claude from a chatbot into a small development team.

Gipp 🦅

10,799 views • 3 months ago

Obsidian just became the most dangerous folder on your computer, and Andrej Karpathy predicted it with 1 markdown file. His method is called append-and-review. He described it years ago and almost nobody listened: 1 single note, every thought appended to the top, reviewed on random scrolls. No tags, no folders, no Notion dashboards with 40 linked databases. The problem was always the same the note remembers, but it can't act. That changed the moment people pointed Claude Code at an Obsidian vault. Here's the setup that's quietly spreading: Part 1 — The vault becomes a database. Obsidian stores everything as plain markdown on your disk, which means Claude Code can read it like a codebase. You open a terminal inside the vault folder and your 2,000 notes turn into queryable memory. Part 2 — The CLAUDEmd file becomes the brain stem. One file at the root tells the agent who you are, what you're building, and how your notes are structured. From that point every session starts with full context instead of a blank chat window. Part 3 — Karpathy append log becomes fuel. You dump raw thoughts all day ideas, links, half-sentences. Then 1 command at night: review today's appends, extract action items, draft the 3 posts hiding in there, link them to existing notes. The messy log goes in, structured output comes out, and the vault rewrites itself while you sleep. Part 4 — Agents start living in your notes. People are running weekly reviews, content calendars, even market research as scheduled Claude Code runs over their vault. Your second brain stops being a graveyard of highlights and starts shipping. The honest math: setup takes about 90 minutes, the first week feels like overkill, and by day 30 you're sitting on a system where every note you've written in 5 years is working for you instead of rotting in a folder. Notion needed a server, a subscription and your data on someone else's machine. Obsidian needed a text file and now the text file has an employee.

Obsidian just became the most dangerous folder on your computer, and Andrej Karpathy predicted it with 1 markdown file. His method is called append-and-review. He described it years ago and almost nobody listened: 1 single note, every thought appended to the top, reviewed on random scrolls. No tags, no folders, no Notion dashboards with 40 linked databases. The problem was always the same the note remembers, but it can't act. That changed the moment people pointed Claude Code at an Obsidian vault. Here's the setup that's quietly spreading: Part 1 — The vault becomes a database. Obsidian stores everything as plain markdown on your disk, which means Claude Code can read it like a codebase. You open a terminal inside the vault folder and your 2,000 notes turn into queryable memory. Part 2 — The CLAUDEmd file becomes the brain stem. One file at the root tells the agent who you are, what you're building, and how your notes are structured. From that point every session starts with full context instead of a blank chat window. Part 3 — Karpathy append log becomes fuel. You dump raw thoughts all day ideas, links, half-sentences. Then 1 command at night: review today's appends, extract action items, draft the 3 posts hiding in there, link them to existing notes. The messy log goes in, structured output comes out, and the vault rewrites itself while you sleep. Part 4 — Agents start living in your notes. People are running weekly reviews, content calendars, even market research as scheduled Claude Code runs over their vault. Your second brain stops being a graveyard of highlights and starts shipping. The honest math: setup takes about 90 minutes, the first week feels like overkill, and by day 30 you're sitting on a system where every note you've written in 5 years is working for you instead of rotting in a folder. Notion needed a server, a subscription and your data on someone else's machine. Obsidian needed a text file and now the text file has an employee.

Spike 1%

58,428 views • 2 months ago

Claude Opus 5.5 just one shot a full multiplayer battle royale like Call of Duty Warzone. Then I used Claude Opus 5.5 with Ultracode to polish it. Parachute drops, a storm that closes over 8 circles, a full map with named towns, and real players dropping in from around the world. Opus 5.5 is unstoppable.

Claude Opus 5.5 just one shot a full multiplayer battle royale like Call of Duty Warzone. Then I used Claude Opus 5.5 with Ultracode to polish it. Parachute drops, a storm that closes over 8 circles, a full map with named towns, and real players dropping in from around the world. Opus 5.5 is unstoppable.

BridgeMind

107,011 views • 3 days ago

Opus 5.5 is the best model I've used for game dev. It built me a city where every building breaks, and a full game around it: seven stages, missions in each one, a pet app that calls when your kaiju is hungry. I played it start to finish and didn't hit a bug. All of it on one weekly Claude limit, with 10% to spare. Highly recommend it.

Opus 5.5 is the best model I've used for game dev. It built me a city where every building breaks, and a full game around it: seven stages, missions in each one, a pet app that calls when your kaiju is hungry. I played it start to finish and didn't hit a bug. All of it on one weekly Claude limit, with 10% to spare. Highly recommend it.

Stefan 3D AI

10,726 views • 3 days ago

THAT’S LITERALLY INSANE. I GAVE GPT-6 ASTRA ACCESS TO MY OBSIDIAN VAULT, AND THE REASONING DEPTH GENUINELY SURPRISED ME. Years of notes. Old projects. Half-finished ideas. Questions I kept coming back to. I wanted to see what would happen when the conversation started with all that context. → Here’s the test that makes this interesting. Ask a question that crosses years. “What pattern keeps repeating across my projects?” Now the task involves connecting things you wrote at different times, for different reasons. A launch journal. A project retrospective. A weekly review. Then push on the connection. “Which notes support that?” “Which ones contradict it?” “What are you assuming?” That’s where I’d spend my time. Following the sources. Checking whether the explanation holds up. Finding out whether an apparent pattern survives a harder question. Your old notes become something you can interrogate. The decisions you forgot making. The assumptions you never revisited. The same problem showing up under three different names. The video visualizes that workflow. It’s an illustrative concept, not a recording of my vault or a benchmark. My reaction is personal. Try the same questions with your own notes and judge the answers yourself. I documented the whole thing. Full walkthrough in the article below ↓

THAT’S LITERALLY INSANE. I GAVE GPT-6 ASTRA ACCESS TO MY OBSIDIAN VAULT, AND THE REASONING DEPTH GENUINELY SURPRISED ME. Years of notes. Old projects. Half-finished ideas. Questions I kept coming back to. I wanted to see what would happen when the conversation started with all that context. → Here’s the test that makes this interesting. Ask a question that crosses years. “What pattern keeps repeating across my projects?” Now the task involves connecting things you wrote at different times, for different reasons. A launch journal. A project retrospective. A weekly review. Then push on the connection. “Which notes support that?” “Which ones contradict it?” “What are you assuming?” That’s where I’d spend my time. Following the sources. Checking whether the explanation holds up. Finding out whether an apparent pattern survives a harder question. Your old notes become something you can interrogate. The decisions you forgot making. The assumptions you never revisited. The same problem showing up under three different names. The video visualizes that workflow. It’s an illustrative concept, not a recording of my vault or a benchmark. My reaction is personal. Try the same questions with your own notes and judge the answers yourself. I documented the whole thing. Full walkthrough in the article below ↓

CyrilXBT

13,406 views • 21 days ago

i spent 40 minutes explaining to Claude who i am. my niche. my voice. my audience. what i never say. generic output. every single time. turns out the problem wasn't Claude. it was me giving it nothing to work with. the fix: a knowledge layer. 20 minutes to set up. your notes, tweets, articles dumped into one folder. agent reads it overnight and builds 200+ wiki pages from your own thinking. next morning your AI finally sounds like you. 90% of people skip this. they just prompt → accept → ship. and wonder why everything sounds the same. and if you learn to set this up for others? 10 clients = $56,800/year. full guide below 👇

i spent 40 minutes explaining to Claude who i am. my niche. my voice. my audience. what i never say. generic output. every single time. turns out the problem wasn't Claude. it was me giving it nothing to work with. the fix: a knowledge layer. 20 minutes to set up. your notes, tweets, articles dumped into one folder. agent reads it overnight and builds 200+ wiki pages from your own thinking. next morning your AI finally sounds like you. 90% of people skip this. they just prompt → accept → ship. and wonder why everything sounds the same. and if you learn to set this up for others? 10 clients = $56,800/year. full guide below 👇

Crypto Mavka

10,742 views • 4 months ago

Leak Disclaimer: I am NOT part of the community and do not have access This is EVERY community note written for the PlayStation acc from July 1-11, leaked to me by a source I won’t name Since Sony announced abandoning physical media they have been aggressively community noted on every post they make Most notes shown don’t get approved and only the top-rated actually get pinned publicly. This leak shows how the notes appear from a moderator’s perspective

Leak Disclaimer: I am NOT part of the community and do not have access This is EVERY community note written for the PlayStation acc from July 1-11, leaked to me by a source I won’t name Since Sony announced abandoning physical media they have been aggressively community noted on every post they make Most notes shown don’t get approved and only the top-rated actually get pinned publicly. This leak shows how the notes appear from a moderator’s perspective

SuperSisi

43,289 views • 2 months ago

Official Anthropic tip for Claude Code: stop burning Opus 5.5 on work Sonnet 5.5 can do, while Fable 5.1 sits idle hand the grunt work to Sonnet 5.5 subagents and put Fable 5.1 on call run /advisor fable Opus 5.5 plans and merges Sonnet 5.5 subagents read, edit and run the tests Fable 5.1 reads the full session and only speaks up at three points: → before a plan: is this the right approach? → when the same error comes back: am I digging in the wrong place? → before "done": what did I miss? Sonnet 5.5 builds. Fable 5.1 reviews. Opus 5.5 ships Jev engineering is the same move one layer down: the forks that need no thinker (which file, which tool, retry or stop) go to Jev in under half a second, and the big models only see the ones that split - the full tree > Opus 5.5 on high runs the main session > explorer reads the code on Sonnet 5.5 > worker edits and runs tests on Sonnet 5.5 > researcher pulls the docs on Sonnet 5.5 > all three on medium > Fable 5.1 on call for main and every subagent paste the tree and this prompt into Claude Code ↓ "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree: 1. Check ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents for subagents that already fit explorer, worker and researcher. > Draft new ones only for missing roles > Give each model: sonnet, effort: medium > Skip any that pin a different model and list them 2. Set the main session to high via effortLevel in ~/.claude/settings.json, and set advisorModel to fable 3. Find anything that keeps the advisor off (CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY) plus CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which overrides subagent effort. Report them, change nothing 4. Add one rule to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: consult the advisor before a large plan, when an error repeats, and before calling a long task done Show me every change as a diff first. No edits until I say go." ↳

Official Anthropic tip for Claude Code: stop burning Opus 5.5 on work Sonnet 5.5 can do, while Fable 5.1 sits idle hand the grunt work to Sonnet 5.5 subagents and put Fable 5.1 on call run /advisor fable Opus 5.5 plans and merges Sonnet 5.5 subagents read, edit and run the tests Fable 5.1 reads the full session and only speaks up at three points: → before a plan: is this the right approach? → when the same error comes back: am I digging in the wrong place? → before "done": what did I miss? Sonnet 5.5 builds. Fable 5.1 reviews. Opus 5.5 ships Jev engineering is the same move one layer down: the forks that need no thinker (which file, which tool, retry or stop) go to Jev in under half a second, and the big models only see the ones that split - the full tree > Opus 5.5 on high runs the main session > explorer reads the code on Sonnet 5.5 > worker edits and runs tests on Sonnet 5.5 > researcher pulls the docs on Sonnet 5.5 > all three on medium > Fable 5.1 on call for main and every subagent paste the tree and this prompt into Claude Code ↓ "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree: 1. Check ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents for subagents that already fit explorer, worker and researcher. > Draft new ones only for missing roles > Give each model: sonnet, effort: medium > Skip any that pin a different model and list them 2. Set the main session to high via effortLevel in ~/.claude/settings.json, and set advisorModel to fable 3. Find anything that keeps the advisor off (CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY) plus CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which overrides subagent effort. Report them, change nothing 4. Add one rule to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: consult the advisor before a large plan, when an error repeats, and before calling a long task done Show me every change as a diff first. No edits until I say go." ↳

delost

42,409 views • 3 days ago