Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Behavior Analysis Experts EXPOSE Moderator Bias Against Trump in Tonight's Debate Dr. Phil's guests bring the receipts. 1. “There was clearly a bias against Trump in their faces.” 2. Scott Rouse observed that Trump’s microphone was louder, making him appear aggressive. 3. Trump was “fact-checked” by moderators during his...

2,206,785 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 год назад

Full Video via @DrPhil:

Фото профиля AmericanPapaBear
AmericanPapaBear1 год назад

@DrPhil ABC has literally no credibility left. That was a drive by debate.

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 год назад

@DrPhil We all saw a 3-on-1 fight with our own eyes, but it's nice when the experts confirm ABC's bias.

Фото профиля Michele Weslander-Quaid
Michele Weslander-Quaid1 год назад

@DrPhil Number 5 is important to note. There was negative framing of the questions posed to Trump, putting him on the defensive.

Фото профиля The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊1 год назад

@DrPhil Exactly, Michelle. That makes a HUGE difference. It was a totally unfair debate.

Фото профиля Moni 💕
Moni 💕1 год назад

@DrPhil Regardless … Trump won on policy. The only people happy tonight are the people that hate Trump because Kamala threw daggers at him all night. Trumps numbers improved on the number one policy important to voters.

Фото профиля Brian Kennedy
Brian Kennedy1 год назад

@DrPhil The American people see what's happening

Фото профиля Elon's Musk
Elon's Musk1 год назад

@DrPhil Making Trump's mic louder than Kamala's to make him sound aggressive is a pretty dirty trick there ABC

Фото профиля Rafał ✈️
Rafał ✈️1 год назад

@DrPhil The whole debate was rigged in favor of Harris. The moderators did everything to favor her while discrediting Trump. Yet, Trump still won the debate. Imagine what would've happened if the moderators were actually neutral?

Фото профиля Think for Yourself
Think for Yourself1 год назад

@DrPhil Excellent analysis. The moderators were biased against Trump. That’s pretty obvious but there’s also a degree of bias. You can be biased a little, some or a lot. These two moderators were off the chart biased. Very unfair.

Похожие видео

Top 5 lies that the ABC News moderators refused to fact-check or falsely fact-checked during the debate: 1. Mandatory Firearm Buybacks: Kamala Harris told Trump to "stop lying" about her wanting to confiscate firearms. Harris has previously stated multiple times that she wants to launch a mandatory buyback program. The ABC moderators said nothing. 2. "Fine People" Hoax: Kamala Harris claimed Trump called neo-N*zi's "very fine people." This hoax was debunked by Snopes but the ABC moderators let it slide. The ABC moderators said nothing. 3. Post-Birth Abortion: Trump claimed babies were 'k*lled' outside the womb in failed abortions. Under Tim Walz, babies born alive in botched abortions are allowed to be left to d*e. Eight babies who survived abortions in Minnesota were abandoned and sadly perished under Walz. The ABC moderators simply said Trump was lying and moved on without adding context. 4. Defund the Police: Kamala Harris laughed when Trump said she wanted to defund the police. During a previous interview, Harris said having more cops on the street is "wrong." She also supported taking police officers out of schools. The ABC moderators said nothing. 5. Bl**dbath Hoax: Kamala Harris claimed Trump said there would be a bl**dbath if he is not elected, insinuating that his supporters would start k*lling people. This is completely false. The comment was made during a rally where Trump said there would be a "bl**dbath" for the American auto industry if he is not elected. The ABC moderators said nothing.

Collin Rugg

6,899,859 просмотров • 1 год назад

She is Biden: The ABC Debate Fiasco - Where's the Fair Play? ABC is totally biased against Donald Trump let's dive into why this is the case. She is Biden, and tonight, Kamala Harris proved just that at the ABC debate, standing not as her own candidate but as the shadow of Joe Biden, echoing his policies, his failures, and his vision for America, which has led us astray. The ABC Debate Night Tonight, as millions tuned into ABC, expecting a fair battleground for ideas, what they witnessed instead was a glaring example of media bias. Here's how it unfolded: She is Biden Kamala Harris took the stage, not as a fresh voice for America, but as a mouthpiece for the current administration. "She is Biden," supporters whispered across social media platforms. Her policies? A mirror image of Biden's. From economic strategies to foreign policy, Harris did little to differentiate herself, reinforcing the notion that a vote for her is essentially a vote for a third Biden term. This isn't just a talking point; it's a reality for those who feel the current presidency has not addressed their concerns. The ABC Bias The debate, hosted by ABC, was supposed to be a neutral ground. However, from the outset, the moderators seemed to debate Trump themselves. Questions were loaded, follow-ups were scarce when Harris spoke, but when it came to Trump, it felt like an interrogation rather than a debate. The bias was palpable, with posts on X highlighting every instance where Trump was cut off or challenged more aggressively than Harris. "Quite Please," as Trump used Kamala's own lines against her. Quiet Please is a trending phrase as viewers begged for moderators to let Trump speak without interruption. Quite Please, Let Them Debate! The cry for moderators to step back and "Quite Please" allow the candidates to engage directly with each other was loud among Trump supporters. The constant interjections not only disrupted the flow but also seemed strategically placed to throw Trump off his game. This interference was seen not just as poor moderation but as an active participation against Trump. This debate was 3 on 1! Where is Our President? The sentiment "Where is our President?" echoed through the night. Not only referring to Biden, but to Trump, who many supporters feel was the last true defender of their values in the White House. They yearned for the days when, in their view, America was first, energy was independent, and the economy was booming. Tonight's debate was a stark reminder of what has been lost, with Harris's performance only underscoring the continuity of Biden's policies. Conclusion: A Night of Missed Opportunities For Trump supporters, the ABC debate was less about policy discussion and more about the struggle against what they perceive as entrenched media bias. "She is Biden" wasn't just a critique of Harris but a broader commentary on the lack of new vision from the current administration. The debate left many questions unanswered and reinforced the divide. Where was the fair play? Where was the opportunity for Trump to present his vision without the filter of bias? As the night ended, the conversation on X wasn't about policy wins or losses but about the battle against bias, the call for respect ("Quite Please"), and the longing for what supporters see as strong leadership. Tonight, ABC didn't just host a debate; for many, it staged a showdown between Trump and the establishment, with "She is Biden" as the theme echoing into the night. Trump won the debate because he has truth and an amazing record on his side. Trump won the debate against three people. Kamala sounded scripted like she literally memorized the answers in advance.

Thomas Paine Band

73,031 просмотров • 1 год назад

Full Debate Analysis: Trump won convincingly, had a strong performance, despite going into a 3-1 debate against the moderators. However, Kamala did not bomb, and did enough to keep her campaign alive. The story of the debate is ABC showing their blatant bias in favor of Kamala, and weaponized their “fact-checks” solely at Trump. They let Kamala lie unchecked about everything from the Project 2025 hoax, to the Charlottesville hoax, and everything in between. The ABC moderators showed a clear and obvious hostility towards Trump, that they did not show towards Kamala, and in many cases, teed Kamala up to bash Trump with prepared talking points. It is now abundantly clear why Kamala refused to accept the debate on Fox News, because her campaign knew she would receive preferential treatment on ABC. Kamala also was well-rehearsed, which is unlike her, almost as if she had the questions given to her ahead of time. If ABC were willing to be adversarial towards Trump, why would they stop there? Why wouldn’t they give Kamala the questions? ABC (Disney) just confirmed on national TV, that they are in bed with the DNC, and given their war-like posture towards Trump, I think it’s safe to assume Kamala’s campaign were made aware of the questions before hand. With all that being said, Trump got the viral moments of the night, stuck to his gameplan, and brushed off the endless lies and repeated attacks, from both Kamala and the moderators. Kamala’s optics were terrible, with her constant smirking, making faces, emotional responses, and monotone phony tone. And Trump refused to let her get her viral moment. Kamala’s gameplan was to appear more moderate, and blame Trump for all the problems she and Biden created over the last 4 years, but anyone who has been paying attention saw this for what it was. Given Kamala held her own and did not implode, we can expect the compromised MSM to claim Kamala won, and the headlines will be about Trump talking about Haitians eating pets. However, the viral internet clips will belong to Trump. Overall, Kamala did not gain any ground, Trump put on a solid performance, and the public got to see the MSM are clearly engaged in election interference in favor of the Dems. Net positive for Trump.

Clandestine

534,409 просмотров • 1 год назад

This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate. There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span. This is not “bias." It’s much worse. This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information. When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is. The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed. In this clip: 1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange. 2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check. 3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check. 4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check. 5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check. 6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check. 7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check. To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators: "They did exactly what their bosses wanted."

Western Lensman

41,368,483 просмотров • 1 год назад