Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Ben Affleck admits to forcing actors and crew members to work for completely free, claiming it’s the only way to make them "give a s**t" about their jobs "We just started this film fund for independent theatrical films, part of the ethos was like, 'Okay, you're not going to...

rixlerr's profile picture

Rixlerr

8,707 subscribers

265,633 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaSanat
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

34 Yorum

Satoru Sato profil fotoğrafı
Satoru Sato9 gün önce

They're not working for free. They're working for a piece of the upside. Don't see the problem with that.

Adam Levenberg profil fotoğrafı
Adam Levenberg9 gün önce

Affleck does a very poor job of describing this. It's not working for free. And the crew is paid. In many cases with the actors, their participation guarantees a certain level of value and profit to begin with. And profits are not about how many people watch it.

David Iverson profil fotoğrafı
David Iverson9 gün önce

So nice when the mega millionaire discusses how, for art, others should work for free. How progressive of him.

Dillen profil fotoğrafı
Dillen9 gün önce

He absolutely right about this. People do however need some sort of wage during the process to pay bills.

MangoSoak profil fotoğrafı
MangoSoak9 gün önce

This used to work until people lost trust in the system cause cunts like this out of touch douchebags do everything to not pay you. Latest example Subnautica. Hell even my best friend did that shit to me. So fuck this clown who happens to be an investor in generative Ai.

Maple-Money-Manager profil fotoğrafı
Maple-Money-Manager9 gün önce

I would take this deal. I would totally work on a Ben Affleck movie receiving only equity in exchange. I assume they work for SAG minimum or something still so they don't get zero salary. But getting equity upside is great and a risk I'd evaluate and take.

Howdy Dooby profil fotoğrafı
Howdy Dooby9 gün önce

"Forcing" is an insane choice of words, friend.

Cheddar profil fotoğrafı
Cheddar9 gün önce

Yet another example of Psychopathic behavior from a rich person

Paco profil fotoğrafı
Paco9 gün önce

This, ladies and gentlemen, is the prime example of "no risk it, no biscuit". Two types of people... 1. The type requiring risk-free payment for work...zero risk, just pay me for my time. 2. The type to invest their efforts and delay gratification for the potential multiplier payoff. Both people are great...until group #1 gets upset with group #2's financial success.

DanDenied profil fotoğrafı
DanDenied9 gün önce

This isn’t working for free.

Alex profil fotoğrafı
Alex9 gün önce

They aren’t forced. They choose to take the job. Which could potentially pay much better than any other offer they’d get. No different than me working in a tech startup for a crap salary and a ton of stock options.

dcgrid profil fotoğrafı
dcgrid9 gün önce

How is that forcing them? The actors share risk/reward

David profil fotoğrafı
David9 gün önce

This works for wealthy actors. It does not work for the crew member who has rent due Friday. The better model is simple: Fair salary + reasonable upside. Alignment is smart. Making lower paid workers finance the movie with their labor is not.

AlexRandall profil fotoğrafı
AlexRandall9 gün önce

Ben is right. Capitalism at work is a beautiful thing to behold. Yet in politics Ben supports Democrats and their socialist commie perspective. Go figure.

Jordan Lamonte III profil fotoğrafı
Jordan Lamonte III9 gün önce

Here’s the problem: those people working didn’t write the script. They didn’t shoot the film, they didn’t negotiate deals with distributors and they weren’t in charge of marketing. All of those things are truly what make a film pop so why couldn’t they just be regularly paid?

Sorta something profil fotoğrafı
Sorta something9 gün önce

No is forced to do anything. They aren't slaves. They agreed to a contract. This is the structure people want because they feel jibbed if the movie does well. See the Obsession art director.

Felon Shucks profil fotoğrafı
Felon Shucks9 gün önce

Wow @BenAffleck you're very dumb for someone so hip with it. Most ppl don't give 2 hoots about a chance at something making 100 million $. They just NEED THE DAMN MONEY THEY'RE OWED FOR THEIR TIME AND EFDORT TO LIVE ON. Check your damn privilege mr superstar dumass geez.

Gun Eaglefreedom™ profil fotoğrafı
Gun Eaglefreedom™9 gün önce

Badass. I love that he’s 100% convinced that he’s right about everything and not only that—everyone else is A DEAD WRONG IDIOT. Reminds me of me.

hawkeyeheritage profil fotoğrafı
hawkeyeheritage9 gün önce

sounds like ben believes in capitalism with no handouts and merit. most likely he votes opposite. libbywood actors

Odes Radcliffe profil fotoğrafı
Odes Radcliffe9 gün önce

Lol. Ben Affleck rediscovering communism

Thomas Putnam's Severed Head profil fotoğrafı
Thomas Putnam's Severed Head9 gün önce

I mean he could pay them and also give them a portion of the gross profits, that would also work

J Scott Smith profil fotoğrafı
J Scott Smith9 gün önce

Definitely not a pro-labor argument. People have bills to pay. Surely, if there's less pay for more of the backend that's one thing, but no pay at all? Doesn't really work for regular Americans

mediumawesome profil fotoğrafı
mediumawesome9 gün önce

They're not working for free, like most places you get paid after you do the work

Andrew Rising profil fotoğrafı
Andrew Rising9 gün önce

The great job done by the gaffer does not guarantee a hit

Joe_Hoegan profil fotoğrafı
Joe_Hoegan9 gün önce

This guy is a moron. He's talking about people that don't get paid for how good the movie does. There is a very short list of people that get the backend.

Isaac A profil fotoğrafı
Isaac A9 gün önce

So how are they going to pay their bills, mortgages and food in the meantime?

Bravalita profil fotoğrafı
Bravalita9 gün önce

Coming from one of the most well paid actors in Hollywood? 😂

The Sightsmith profil fotoğrafı
The Sightsmith9 gün önce

Wallstreet bonus logic but you can't pay your rent

Squirrel Master profil fotoğrafı
Squirrel Master9 gün önce

he's transforming into Dave Smith or vice versa I've never seen them both in the same place at once

Glenda profil fotoğrafı
Glenda9 gün önce

Nobody has ever said that Ben Affleck is intelligent.

Donovan profil fotoğrafı
Donovan9 gün önce

It improves incentive to produce good quality work, good effort

Steven profil fotoğrafı
Steven9 gün önce

The problem is you’re at the mercy of someone’s shitty decisions. You only get a small contributor to the success. This reminds me of when my yearly bonus was tied to some other group that had noticing to do with engineering. So I’m getting less because the sales team sucks.

John C profil fotoğrafı
John C9 gün önce

Clickbait tweet. Not what he's saying at all.

whatsHotapp_DotCom profil fotoğrafı
whatsHotapp_DotCom9 gün önce

at end of the day pay your people and be transparent the problem is not what Ben said , we get that the problem is the companies that can afford to pay people fuck them over and that should be against the law

Benzer Videolar

Scott on why conviction in an idea is dangerous as an investor but required as a founder: "From the investor seat, I don't think you want to be in love with an idea. That's a risky thing because you'll find a way to express that by investing and make some compromises on the team because you know this idea is just so good, its time has come. But if the team isn't there, 90% of the time it doesn't work. Then there's a whole thing can you swap out the team? But the whole Founders Fund thesis was always no, you need the founder to run the company. But on the company side, you have to be in love with the idea. It's not that rational to start a company. There's a lot easier, more comfortable ways to make money if that's the goal. So it's got to be about what the company is doing specifically. If you want to actually start a company, it better be something that you're really passionate about, or you think that the problem is really important."
1:15

Scott on why conviction in an idea is dangerous as an investor but required as a founder: "From the investor seat, I don't think you want to be in love with an idea. That's a risky thing because you'll find a way to express that by investing and make some compromises on the team because you know this idea is just so good, its time has come. But if the team isn't there, 90% of the time it doesn't work. Then there's a whole thing can you swap out the team? But the whole Founders Fund thesis was always no, you need the founder to run the company. But on the company side, you have to be in love with the idea. It's not that rational to start a company. There's a lot easier, more comfortable ways to make money if that's the goal. So it's got to be about what the company is doing specifically. If you want to actually start a company, it better be something that you're really passionate about, or you think that the problem is really important."

Patrick OShaughnessy

33,016 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Some people need to hear this again. I've said it countless times before in pretty much all my videos over the last year(s): If you're serious about software engineering (i.e., you want to get or keep a job or get serious work done) => You NEED to be open to AI! Use it as a tool. Don't dismiss it as "slop" or a fad. If that's your take, you need to THINK AGAIN. The Zig approach of banning AI is NOT the way unless you're doing this for your personal joy. Which is fine. It really is. But it will NOT land you a job, if that's what you're going for. And rightfully so, because I truly am convinced that you ARE way more productive with AI. When using it correctly. As a tool. Which is what we're all still figuring out.
12:22

Some people need to hear this again. I've said it countless times before in pretty much all my videos over the last year(s): If you're serious about software engineering (i.e., you want to get or keep a job or get serious work done) => You NEED to be open to AI! Use it as a tool. Don't dismiss it as "slop" or a fad. If that's your take, you need to THINK AGAIN. The Zig approach of banning AI is NOT the way unless you're doing this for your personal joy. Which is fine. It really is. But it will NOT land you a job, if that's what you're going for. And rightfully so, because I truly am convinced that you ARE way more productive with AI. When using it correctly. As a tool. Which is what we're all still figuring out.

Maximilian

22,812 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Ben Affleck breaks down why a $25M movie has to make $100M just to break even Affleck: "It's very, very difficult to make a movie for less than $25 million" "You spend about the same amount to advertise the movie as you spend to make it. So you spent $25 million to make it, $25 million to advertise it now you've got $50 million into the movie" "From the theaters you get back roughly 50%. So if a movie makes $100 million, you get back $50 million. You've got to gross a hundred million just in simple math" "People now go, 'this movie looks good, but I'll see it when it comes on streaming'"
1:28

Ben Affleck breaks down why a $25M movie has to make $100M just to break even Affleck: "It's very, very difficult to make a movie for less than $25 million" "You spend about the same amount to advertise the movie as you spend to make it. So you spent $25 million to make it, $25 million to advertise it now you've got $50 million into the movie" "From the theaters you get back roughly 50%. So if a movie makes $100 million, you get back $50 million. You've got to gross a hundred million just in simple math" "People now go, 'this movie looks good, but I'll see it when it comes on streaming'"

Arslan

3,574,512 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"
2:05

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"

Brad

35,334 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Matt Damon explains why a $25,000,000 movie must make $100,000,000 to break even after DVDs became obsolete “The economics of trying to make a kind of mid range drama now are just so terrible. If you have a $25 million movie, you have to put that much into print and advertising, so that’s $50 million. You split your money between the distributor and the exhibitor, so the people who own the movie theaters get half of the money. That means if your cost is now at $50 million, you need to make $100 million just to break even” “That’s why Behind the Candelabra, we did it at HBO because we couldn’t get funding from any studio. They said, ‘We love you guys. We believe in you. We think the movie is going to be great, but would I bet that this is going to make $100 million. Would I gamble $50 million on that assumption. It’s just too much’” “That’s because the DVD market is gone, and technology just erased the DVD. That was a huge revenue stream for all of us because you could afford for your movie to come out in a theater and not make everything back. It could make it partially back, and you’d know the DVD was coming to help fill the gap”
1:06

Matt Damon explains why a $25,000,000 movie must make $100,000,000 to break even after DVDs became obsolete “The economics of trying to make a kind of mid range drama now are just so terrible. If you have a $25 million movie, you have to put that much into print and advertising, so that’s $50 million. You split your money between the distributor and the exhibitor, so the people who own the movie theaters get half of the money. That means if your cost is now at $50 million, you need to make $100 million just to break even” “That’s why Behind the Candelabra, we did it at HBO because we couldn’t get funding from any studio. They said, ‘We love you guys. We believe in you. We think the movie is going to be great, but would I bet that this is going to make $100 million. Would I gamble $50 million on that assumption. It’s just too much’” “That’s because the DVD market is gone, and technology just erased the DVD. That was a huge revenue stream for all of us because you could afford for your movie to come out in a theater and not make everything back. It could make it partially back, and you’d know the DVD was coming to help fill the gap”

dank

80,767 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."
5:30

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,397 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Seth Rogen revealed that many studio executives care deeply about being thanked during award speeches because it’s often the only public recognition they receive for their work. Seth Rogen: And we were like, "Oh, no." And then we interviewed almost every head of every studio, kind of past and present, like in the months leading up to the show, and as we were writing the show, we wanted to get a lot of insight. And it was one of the most consistent things that was said to us was, "You just want to be thanked at an award show, by first and last name." Because, and it makes sense, a lot of people don't realize this, and I didn't even like think about it this way like, their names are not on the movies. Like, and they feel like they've really contributed to them, and sometimes spent years of their lives working on these things. But if you work at the studio, you don't get your name in the actual credits of the movie. And unless someone like Googles who was the head of the studio during the years that movie came out, no one would ever know you had anything to do with it. So, it is the only like way to set in stone that you... (laughs) had anything to do with the movie, was to be, is to be thanked at an award show. And...
2:02

Seth Rogen revealed that many studio executives care deeply about being thanked during award speeches because it’s often the only public recognition they receive for their work. Seth Rogen: And we were like, "Oh, no." And then we interviewed almost every head of every studio, kind of past and present, like in the months leading up to the show, and as we were writing the show, we wanted to get a lot of insight. And it was one of the most consistent things that was said to us was, "You just want to be thanked at an award show, by first and last name." Because, and it makes sense, a lot of people don't realize this, and I didn't even like think about it this way like, their names are not on the movies. Like, and they feel like they've really contributed to them, and sometimes spent years of their lives working on these things. But if you work at the studio, you don't get your name in the actual credits of the movie. And unless someone like Googles who was the head of the studio during the years that movie came out, no one would ever know you had anything to do with it. So, it is the only like way to set in stone that you... (laughs) had anything to do with the movie, was to be, is to be thanked at an award show. And...

Ruzy.hl

246,598 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Will Ferrell reveals why he turned down a massive payday for the ELF sequel "I was offered a crazy amount of money" "there was a lot of movement after the film initially came out, of which I maintained that it's going to be really hard because it's a classic fish out of water story" "an attempt was made at a script, which, you know, tried its best, but I just was like, I don't know" "I have to be able to sit in a setting like this and talk about the movie in a way that I feel good about" "if I were to promote that movie, I'd be literally saying I did it for the money. Straight up" "I'm like, do you want that messaging out there? then they tried a little bit later down the road and it just..."
1:00

Will Ferrell reveals why he turned down a massive payday for the ELF sequel "I was offered a crazy amount of money" "there was a lot of movement after the film initially came out, of which I maintained that it's going to be really hard because it's a classic fish out of water story" "an attempt was made at a script, which, you know, tried its best, but I just was like, I don't know" "I have to be able to sit in a setting like this and talk about the movie in a way that I feel good about" "if I were to promote that movie, I'd be literally saying I did it for the money. Straight up" "I'm like, do you want that messaging out there? then they tried a little bit later down the road and it just..."

Rixlerr

1,015,779 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

why Rogan believes wanting the money is the thing that stops you from getting it MrBeast: "I would argue it's not even just for content creation. If you want to be an accountant or really anything, it's just put in a lot of hours, do a lot of iterations, surround yourself with great people, and obsess over it. Stay focused, consume it. And then recognize, you might be like, 'Oh, well, this person did it in 10 months. Why is it taking me so long?' It's average and statistics. Just give yourself enough time frame. I'm not saying you'll make tens of millions of dollars, but if you want to do that thing for a living, if you follow those trades, it's going to happen eventually." Rogan: "Well, you have to be process-oriented, not goal-oriented. The process is getting better at stuff. The goal of being financially secure comes with it eventually. But if you think 'I want X amount of money,' well, that's what you're going to think about. You're not going to think about the actual thing you're making, so it won't be as good, so you'll probably never get there."
0:45

why Rogan believes wanting the money is the thing that stops you from getting it MrBeast: "I would argue it's not even just for content creation. If you want to be an accountant or really anything, it's just put in a lot of hours, do a lot of iterations, surround yourself with great people, and obsess over it. Stay focused, consume it. And then recognize, you might be like, 'Oh, well, this person did it in 10 months. Why is it taking me so long?' It's average and statistics. Just give yourself enough time frame. I'm not saying you'll make tens of millions of dollars, but if you want to do that thing for a living, if you follow those trades, it's going to happen eventually." Rogan: "Well, you have to be process-oriented, not goal-oriented. The process is getting better at stuff. The goal of being financially secure comes with it eventually. But if you think 'I want X amount of money,' well, that's what you're going to think about. You're not going to think about the actual thing you're making, so it won't be as good, so you'll probably never get there."

Naruto

37,430 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🔥WOW: Federal employee calls in to Trump-hating Breakfast Club and UNLOADS on lazy government workers complaining about DOGE: “If you don’t like it, resign!" This is stellar: "I got the email. And I honestly feel like this is a great opportunity to outline what you, as an employee are bringing to the federal government. They could give you an opportunity to get a promotion or something." "God forbid they ask you that you got any other job?" “Anybody in this democratic faith is like -- I don't want to get the parties to it — but they don't want to go to work." "They want to work from home. People are not working from home. You know, this is what you signed up for. If you don't like it, resign!" "I mean, it's not that hard. You complaining about actually working? I don't get it." “This is our taxpayer money. And you have to work. You don’t like it? Get another job." "But the people that's complaining about writing the email, it's going to take, what, five minutes out of your day? Ten minutes. I read on Twitter that guy was complaining, oh, it's going to be an hour. It takes you an hour to write five things that you completed? Okay, maybe you do need another job."
2:27

🔥WOW: Federal employee calls in to Trump-hating Breakfast Club and UNLOADS on lazy government workers complaining about DOGE: “If you don’t like it, resign!" This is stellar: "I got the email. And I honestly feel like this is a great opportunity to outline what you, as an employee are bringing to the federal government. They could give you an opportunity to get a promotion or something." "God forbid they ask you that you got any other job?" “Anybody in this democratic faith is like -- I don't want to get the parties to it — but they don't want to go to work." "They want to work from home. People are not working from home. You know, this is what you signed up for. If you don't like it, resign!" "I mean, it's not that hard. You complaining about actually working? I don't get it." “This is our taxpayer money. And you have to work. You don’t like it? Get another job." "But the people that's complaining about writing the email, it's going to take, what, five minutes out of your day? Ten minutes. I read on Twitter that guy was complaining, oh, it's going to be an hour. It takes you an hour to write five things that you completed? Okay, maybe you do need another job."

Western Lensman

880,864 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Mark Zuckerberg, founder, chairman and CEO of Meta, on how he actually runs the company: "I basically don't believe in delegation." He starts by naming the assumption he's rejecting. "I think that there's sort of this theory that a lot of people have, which is like, all right, the job of a leader is you hire people and you delegate things to them." Zuckerberg doesn't operate that way. He's also clear that he can't personally handle everything: "My theory is there's so much going on across the company that I can't possibly get involved in all of it. So all these people are going to have a ton of stuff that they're going to do. But fundamentally, if there is a decision that I want to be involved with, I'm going to be involved in it." The distinction carries the whole argument. He reserves the right to review any call, and no layer of the org chart gets to tell him something is beneath him or outside his lane. His reasoning comes back to accountability: "I think that's generally a good way for founders to operate. If you're running the company and you're on the hook for everything and there's something that's important at whatever level of detail in the organization, I don't get the logic of saying 'I'm not going to be involved in that.'" That's the load-bearing line. If you're answerable for the output, opting out of the input makes no sense. Mark Zuckerberg does attach one condition, and it's a real one rather than a throwaway: "You want to have humility and know that if you're diving into some decision, you may not have the most context immediately." Diving in means showing up without pretending you already have the answer. The expectation extends across the whole company: "I generally think that you want to be able to just have the cultural expectation that things are not going to be so hierarchical and you're just going to dive into whatever you want."
1:03

Mark Zuckerberg, founder, chairman and CEO of Meta, on how he actually runs the company: "I basically don't believe in delegation." He starts by naming the assumption he's rejecting. "I think that there's sort of this theory that a lot of people have, which is like, all right, the job of a leader is you hire people and you delegate things to them." Zuckerberg doesn't operate that way. He's also clear that he can't personally handle everything: "My theory is there's so much going on across the company that I can't possibly get involved in all of it. So all these people are going to have a ton of stuff that they're going to do. But fundamentally, if there is a decision that I want to be involved with, I'm going to be involved in it." The distinction carries the whole argument. He reserves the right to review any call, and no layer of the org chart gets to tell him something is beneath him or outside his lane. His reasoning comes back to accountability: "I think that's generally a good way for founders to operate. If you're running the company and you're on the hook for everything and there's something that's important at whatever level of detail in the organization, I don't get the logic of saying 'I'm not going to be involved in that.'" That's the load-bearing line. If you're answerable for the output, opting out of the input makes no sense. Mark Zuckerberg does attach one condition, and it's a real one rather than a throwaway: "You want to have humility and know that if you're diving into some decision, you may not have the most context immediately." Diving in means showing up without pretending you already have the answer. The expectation extends across the whole company: "I generally think that you want to be able to just have the cultural expectation that things are not going to be so hierarchical and you're just going to dive into whatever you want."

Big Brain Business

45,196 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

#WATCH | Delhi: Regarding Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan's stance on 'The Kerala Story 2' movie, Kerala BJP President Rajeev Chandrasekhar says, "Pinarayi Vijayan has 45 days more as Chief Minister, and he knows that on the 46th day, he is going to have to move his residence... When a movie came out which is against the BJP, we did not protest or say anything. He quoted Freedom of Expression. How is it that when somebody else makes a movie against his political thinking, it suddenly becomes a problem? This is hypocrisy. This is basically an attempt to distract the people of Kerala from his 10 years of failure. I wanted to tell you, Pinarayi Vijayan, that nobody has appointed you protector. There is no need for you to act like you're a protector of any community... Every Indian today, every Malayali, is given the same fundamental rights... Stop making fools out of people... This movie will be shown because just as much as you have the right to watch a movie, I have the right to watch a movie. Just as any director has the right to make a movie, this director also has the right to make a movie. If you have a problem with it, and if there is something illegal in the movie, go to court. But don't try to threaten people. Don't try to use your Chief Minister's position to create fear amongst people that we will not allow."
2:26

#WATCH | Delhi: Regarding Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan's stance on 'The Kerala Story 2' movie, Kerala BJP President Rajeev Chandrasekhar says, "Pinarayi Vijayan has 45 days more as Chief Minister, and he knows that on the 46th day, he is going to have to move his residence... When a movie came out which is against the BJP, we did not protest or say anything. He quoted Freedom of Expression. How is it that when somebody else makes a movie against his political thinking, it suddenly becomes a problem? This is hypocrisy. This is basically an attempt to distract the people of Kerala from his 10 years of failure. I wanted to tell you, Pinarayi Vijayan, that nobody has appointed you protector. There is no need for you to act like you're a protector of any community... Every Indian today, every Malayali, is given the same fundamental rights... Stop making fools out of people... This movie will be shown because just as much as you have the right to watch a movie, I have the right to watch a movie. Just as any director has the right to make a movie, this director also has the right to make a movie. If you have a problem with it, and if there is something illegal in the movie, go to court. But don't try to threaten people. Don't try to use your Chief Minister's position to create fear amongst people that we will not allow."

ANI

14,145 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Donald Trump reveals the only career advice he'd give to anyone: "If I were going to give career advice to somebody it would be that you have to love it. You have to really want it and you have to love what you're doing" "There are so many people that are forced through family pressure or something into doing something that they don't believe in. You've got to go after the kind of a job you like"
2:08

Donald Trump reveals the only career advice he'd give to anyone: "If I were going to give career advice to somebody it would be that you have to love it. You have to really want it and you have to love what you're doing" "There are so many people that are forced through family pressure or something into doing something that they don't believe in. You've got to go after the kind of a job you like"

Jaynit

59,114 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Cassidy: "The president is proposing that we take the $26b that would be going to insurance companies if we just do an extension and give it directly to the American people in which 100% of the money is used for them to purchase healthcare on their own terms. That makes them an informed consumer."
0:44

Cassidy: "The president is proposing that we take the $26b that would be going to insurance companies if we just do an extension and give it directly to the American people in which 100% of the money is used for them to purchase healthcare on their own terms. That makes them an informed consumer."

Aaron Rupar

548,856 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

If you're an entrepreneur and you're taking a lot of risk, you wanna get five million bucks in T-bills sitting in account. That is what I call the f*** you money that gives you the power to do whatever you want. That protects you and you have to have the discipline to park that. You get to look at it every day and every month you get a big check off it, and leave it alone. Not everyone can get there, but if you get your first pass, take five and just put it into T-bills. Really boringo.
1:26

If you're an entrepreneur and you're taking a lot of risk, you wanna get five million bucks in T-bills sitting in account. That is what I call the f*** you money that gives you the power to do whatever you want. That protects you and you have to have the discipline to park that. You get to look at it every day and every month you get a big check off it, and leave it alone. Not everyone can get there, but if you get your first pass, take five and just put it into T-bills. Really boringo.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

28,040 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

A young boy's rant about living in USA. Also a message for Indians who are obsessed to go to USA in search of alleged "Better life" There's no point in living in the U.S. anymore. Think about it, bruh, the obsession with productivity, the obsession with money, the obsession with status, the obsession with being better than the next person instead of better together. The obsession with competing with other people instead of just comparing who you truly were to who you were a year ago. Everything is monetized, everything is politicized, everything is divided. Even empathy feels conditional. And what really gets me is the way this country treats immigrants. Or better yet, the way it lies about why it treats immigrants the way it does. They act like people are breaking into some sacred paradise, like people are desperate to get into something holy. For what? For debt? For rent that eats half your paycheck? For healthcare that bankrupts you? For a system that does not protect you unless you're useful to it? Bro, people don't come here because America is amazing. They come here because America marketed itself better than it treated people. Remember, America is not a country, it's a business. And now the mask is slipping. What this country actually values is not freedom, it's control. Not life, labor. Not community, consumption. You're free as long as you don't disrupt anything. You're welcome as long as you're profitable. You're human as long as you're quiet. We only respect you if you're valuable and you're easy to conform and control. And if you don't fit the mold, if you question it, if you refuse to worship the system, you're told to be grateful, you're told to shut up, you're told it could be worse, you're told you're crazy. That's the bar. It could be worse. It could be worse? What? I don't hate America. I'm just disappointed in it, bro, because it could have been so much more. It should be so much more. But instead of evolving, it doubled down. Instead of healing, it hardened. Instead of listening, it punished. Instead of building community, instead of building unity, it sells isolation and calls it independence. And I'm at a point in my life where I don't want to just survive inside a system that drains me and calls it opportunity. I want peace, I want community, I want unity, I want love, I want connection, I want affordability. I want to live, bro, I want to live. I'm tired of living in survival mode, bro. I'm tired of having to constantly brace myself for the worst, bro. And look, if that makes me ungrateful, so be it. So f*cking be it. If that makes people uncomfortable, good, because pretending like this is the greatest country on earth while people are drowning is a load of f*cking bullshit. It is not patriotism, it is denial. And I am done lying to myself about that. And until this country actually values life over profit, safety over status, people over systems, connection over individuality, I don't see a reason to stay quiet and I don't see a reason to stay
2:38

A young boy's rant about living in USA. Also a message for Indians who are obsessed to go to USA in search of alleged "Better life" There's no point in living in the U.S. anymore. Think about it, bruh, the obsession with productivity, the obsession with money, the obsession with status, the obsession with being better than the next person instead of better together. The obsession with competing with other people instead of just comparing who you truly were to who you were a year ago. Everything is monetized, everything is politicized, everything is divided. Even empathy feels conditional. And what really gets me is the way this country treats immigrants. Or better yet, the way it lies about why it treats immigrants the way it does. They act like people are breaking into some sacred paradise, like people are desperate to get into something holy. For what? For debt? For rent that eats half your paycheck? For healthcare that bankrupts you? For a system that does not protect you unless you're useful to it? Bro, people don't come here because America is amazing. They come here because America marketed itself better than it treated people. Remember, America is not a country, it's a business. And now the mask is slipping. What this country actually values is not freedom, it's control. Not life, labor. Not community, consumption. You're free as long as you don't disrupt anything. You're welcome as long as you're profitable. You're human as long as you're quiet. We only respect you if you're valuable and you're easy to conform and control. And if you don't fit the mold, if you question it, if you refuse to worship the system, you're told to be grateful, you're told to shut up, you're told it could be worse, you're told you're crazy. That's the bar. It could be worse. It could be worse? What? I don't hate America. I'm just disappointed in it, bro, because it could have been so much more. It should be so much more. But instead of evolving, it doubled down. Instead of healing, it hardened. Instead of listening, it punished. Instead of building community, instead of building unity, it sells isolation and calls it independence. And I'm at a point in my life where I don't want to just survive inside a system that drains me and calls it opportunity. I want peace, I want community, I want unity, I want love, I want connection, I want affordability. I want to live, bro, I want to live. I'm tired of living in survival mode, bro. I'm tired of having to constantly brace myself for the worst, bro. And look, if that makes me ungrateful, so be it. So f*cking be it. If that makes people uncomfortable, good, because pretending like this is the greatest country on earth while people are drowning is a load of f*cking bullshit. It is not patriotism, it is denial. And I am done lying to myself about that. And until this country actually values life over profit, safety over status, people over systems, connection over individuality, I don't see a reason to stay quiet and I don't see a reason to stay

Woke Eminent

17,264 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Qullamaggie on Putting in Work on the Weekends Is the Only Way You Will Make It In Trading “Don't forget to put in a lot of work during the weekend. That's the only way you're going to make it. It's during the weekends. That's where your edge is honed. It's not watching trading choppy markets. That's not where you get an edge. You get an edge by sitting there and doing things most people are not willing to do. That's where edge comes from. Okay, guys. Good luck. See ya.”
0:27

Qullamaggie on Putting in Work on the Weekends Is the Only Way You Will Make It In Trading “Don't forget to put in a lot of work during the weekend. That's the only way you're going to make it. It's during the weekends. That's where your edge is honed. It's not watching trading choppy markets. That's not where you get an edge. You get an edge by sitting there and doing things most people are not willing to do. That's where edge comes from. Okay, guys. Good luck. See ya.”

Lone

15,114 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan: "How crazy is it that Biden deported 1.49 million while letting in 20?" "Like, what do you think they were doing!?" "I know there was also efforts to move people to specific states so that you can get a larger number for the census so you get more congressional seats." "This is a dark thing that people don't want to admit because they're a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat." "I had a conversation with my parents about it and they're like, 'No!' I'm like, 'Yes! It's about congressional seats. It's like, the census counts illegals!'" "And not only that, they're trying to make it so that those people can vote!" "And if you can make it so that those people can vote, then all of the sudden you ship these people to a place, you give them EBT cards, you get them on food stamps, you give them Medicaid money — they have money." "And now, who are you going to vote for? You're going to vote for the people who got you money!" Daily Caller
1:14

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan: "How crazy is it that Biden deported 1.49 million while letting in 20?" "Like, what do you think they were doing!?" "I know there was also efforts to move people to specific states so that you can get a larger number for the census so you get more congressional seats." "This is a dark thing that people don't want to admit because they're a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat." "I had a conversation with my parents about it and they're like, 'No!' I'm like, 'Yes! It's about congressional seats. It's like, the census counts illegals!'" "And not only that, they're trying to make it so that those people can vote!" "And if you can make it so that those people can vote, then all of the sudden you ship these people to a place, you give them EBT cards, you get them on food stamps, you give them Medicaid money — they have money." "And now, who are you going to vote for? You're going to vote for the people who got you money!" Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

259,092 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"I was getting on [Melyssa Ford] for hiding it, not doing it. I just felt like if you're doing this and this is all the rave out in the street and everybody is doing it, then come in there and tell us about it. ... If I'm watching you go in another room, throwing up, cramps, and whatever you're doing, it's like, 'Okay, something's going on over there.' I get people want to keep a secret. I'm not mad at that. Not me. If I'm on it, you're going to hear about it from me." - Joe Budden
6:46

"I was getting on [Melyssa Ford] for hiding it, not doing it. I just felt like if you're doing this and this is all the rave out in the street and everybody is doing it, then come in there and tell us about it. ... If I'm watching you go in another room, throwing up, cramps, and whatever you're doing, it's like, 'Okay, something's going on over there.' I get people want to keep a secret. I'm not mad at that. Not me. If I'm on it, you're going to hear about it from me." - Joe Budden

Club Shay Shay

365,511 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

McGowan: It’s like when you play monopoly and somebody has all of the hotels on the whole board, and it doesn't matter if you're playing the game right, it doesn't matter if you're doing what you're supposed to do, it doesn't matter if you get the education, if you get the job, you are still always going to lose. That is where we are in America right now, and that is not how we should want to be. And I'm saying capitalism is a wonderful system if it is working, it is not currently working for the American people.
0:45

McGowan: It’s like when you play monopoly and somebody has all of the hotels on the whole board, and it doesn't matter if you're playing the game right, it doesn't matter if you're doing what you're supposed to do, it doesn't matter if you get the education, if you get the job, you are still always going to lose. That is where we are in America right now, and that is not how we should want to be. And I'm saying capitalism is a wonderful system if it is working, it is not currently working for the American people.

Acyn

67,998 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce