Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

.Benjamin Bratton argues Yudkowsky misunderstands evolution, and explains why AI may never converge into one giant superintelligence: "Without being too spicy, I don't think Yudkowsky really understands evolution as well as he thinks he does." "It’s a very low-resolution understanding of evolutionary dynamics applied to what will inevitably be... a much more complex problem." "There will be giant models, in the same way you might imagine scales of species in a rainforest. They’re not all operating at the same spatial and temporal scale." "Whether this all collapses into one giant brain, sure, it’s possible, and the reasons may have more to do with economics and politics." "But biology has never arrived at a solution where it’s going to make one giant instantiation of a particular form of mind and consolidate everything together."show more

MTS

569,895 subscribers

18,898 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

6 Kommentare

Profilbild von jane ~ in SF

jane ~ in SFvor 5 Tagen

@bratton 💯💯💯

Profilbild von James Poulos

James Poulosvor 5 Tagen

"A copy is just an identical image. There is the possibility that a single virus could destroy an entire set of systems and copies do not give rise to variety and originality. Life perpetuates itself through diversity and this includes the ability to sacrifice itself when necessary."

Profilbild von Rai ⏹️

Rai ⏹️vor 4 Tagen

@bratton honest q: what had you smiling right after he says he has a spicy take that yudkowsky might not understand evolutionary biology?

Profilbild von Prohumanity

Prohumanityvor 5 Tagen

"But biology has never arrived at a solution where it’s going to make one giant instantiation of a particular form of mind and consolidate everything together." @grok what about myceliums and certain plant species? Besides this statement is quite arrogant, we certainly do not know everything

Profilbild von I am Gaius Julius Caesar

I am Gaius Julius Caesarvor 5 Tagen

@bratton The future is clouded. Prophecies are often misinterpreted.

Profilbild von Joobman

Joobmanvor 5 Tagen

@bratton This is not biology.

Ähnliche Videos

This is my updated thesis on $ABCL. The first one I wrote was back in ‘24. My goal was to lay out the complete vision as I see it: The ingredients of a Zero to One biotech giant in the making. From the founder lineage and Stephen Quake’s influence, to the work with DARPA, business model evolution, tech stack, AI philosophy, pipeline, government ties, GMP facility, pricing scenarios, the Thiel connection, risks etc, tying in all the things I’ve learned over the years to form the complete picture. The road to becoming a giant will be long and nothing is guaranteed, as even CEO of AbCellera, Carl Hansen, acknowledges. But I’ve never been more optimistic about the future of this company, and this article will help you understand why. I hope you enjoy.

This is my updated thesis on $ABCL. The first one I wrote was back in ‘24. My goal was to lay out the complete vision as I see it: The ingredients of a Zero to One biotech giant in the making. From the founder lineage and Stephen Quake’s influence, to the work with DARPA, business model evolution, tech stack, AI philosophy, pipeline, government ties, GMP facility, pricing scenarios, the Thiel connection, risks etc, tying in all the things I’ve learned over the years to form the complete picture. The road to becoming a giant will be long and nothing is guaranteed, as even CEO of AbCellera, Carl Hansen, acknowledges. But I’ve never been more optimistic about the future of this company, and this article will help you understand why. I hope you enjoy.

Jack Prescott

34,973 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Joe Rogan might be in real danger after historical investigator Timothy Alberino just leaked classified Pentagon information about a group of Marines who were all killed by a single unarmed 1,100 pound humanoid in Afghanistan: ALBERINO: “A team of Marines in Afghanistan stormed a cave hunting for Taliban, but they were instead met by an enormous giant who killed them all.” ROGAN: “WHAT?! That’s the craziest thing I’ve ever heard. So the giant just got away?” ALBERINO: “They then deployed another unit to go look for that team. When the team got to the cave that giant was in the middle of eating the dead soldiers.” ROGAN: “You can’t be serious. So what did the giant do to this unit?” ALBERINO: “This new unit went in fully prepared so they were able to successfully kill the giant.” ROGAN: “Did you ever try to find records of who was there and what casualties were reported?” ALBERINO: “It’s very difficult to get that kind of information.” ROGAN: “I’m sure.” ALBERINO: “The Pentagon released a bizarre statement years ago saying that the giant Kandahar incident never happened.” ROGAN: “The Pentagon actually said this? That makes me feel sketchy.” ALBERINO: “The pilot told me they weighed the giant before loading him on the plane. He got measured at 10-12 feet tall and 1,100 pounds.” ROGAN: “1,100 pounds? That can’t be a human. Who else have you spoken with about this?” ALBERINO: “I asked a commander about the Kandahar giant. The blood rushed out of his face and he points to his phone because he thought they might be listening. His wife then whispered to me that he’s not allowed to talk about that.” ROGAN: “Ohhh my god.” ALBERINO: “What I later learned is that it’s not the single giant of Kandahar, it’s the GIANTS. There’s more than one.”

Joe Rogan might be in real danger after historical investigator Timothy Alberino just leaked classified Pentagon information about a group of Marines who were all killed by a single unarmed 1,100 pound humanoid in Afghanistan: ALBERINO: “A team of Marines in Afghanistan stormed a cave hunting for Taliban, but they were instead met by an enormous giant who killed them all.” ROGAN: “WHAT?! That’s the craziest thing I’ve ever heard. So the giant just got away?” ALBERINO: “They then deployed another unit to go look for that team. When the team got to the cave that giant was in the middle of eating the dead soldiers.” ROGAN: “You can’t be serious. So what did the giant do to this unit?” ALBERINO: “This new unit went in fully prepared so they were able to successfully kill the giant.” ROGAN: “Did you ever try to find records of who was there and what casualties were reported?” ALBERINO: “It’s very difficult to get that kind of information.” ROGAN: “I’m sure.” ALBERINO: “The Pentagon released a bizarre statement years ago saying that the giant Kandahar incident never happened.” ROGAN: “The Pentagon actually said this? That makes me feel sketchy.” ALBERINO: “The pilot told me they weighed the giant before loading him on the plane. He got measured at 10-12 feet tall and 1,100 pounds.” ROGAN: “1,100 pounds? That can’t be a human. Who else have you spoken with about this?” ALBERINO: “I asked a commander about the Kandahar giant. The blood rushed out of his face and he points to his phone because he thought they might be listening. His wife then whispered to me that he’s not allowed to talk about that.” ROGAN: “Ohhh my god.” ALBERINO: “What I later learned is that it’s not the single giant of Kandahar, it’s the GIANTS. There’s more than one.”

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

5,623,169 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

OpenAI researcher Lukasz Kaiser explains why he's optimistic AI can remain truly open: intelligence may ultimately work better as many distributed models than one giant model "If you look at the world, humans are the most amazing computers in the world. Our brains are still unmatched by the models, and we are not generalists, and there is not one big brain of humanity. It's a lot of separate people." "Given a fixed amount of data, the best way to learn from it is to have a lot of distributed models that are strong on its own, but even stronger when they're, If you look at some basic research, there are actually reasons to believe it, like ensembles and things like that." "Transformers are great when you feed them all of the internet, but we know there is an algorithm that's even better and it can learn from much smaller data and be amazing at the things it's learning. We are the proof. We have not found it yet, but we will." "All these big models, they're all the same, they're kind of boring. I think they'll be much more fun." OpenAI

OpenAI researcher Lukasz Kaiser explains why he's optimistic AI can remain truly open: intelligence may ultimately work better as many distributed models than one giant model "If you look at the world, humans are the most amazing computers in the world. Our brains are still unmatched by the models, and we are not generalists, and there is not one big brain of humanity. It's a lot of separate people." "Given a fixed amount of data, the best way to learn from it is to have a lot of distributed models that are strong on its own, but even stronger when they're, If you look at some basic research, there are actually reasons to believe it, like ensembles and things like that." "Transformers are great when you feed them all of the internet, but we know there is an algorithm that's even better and it can learn from much smaller data and be amazing at the things it's learning. We are the proof. We have not found it yet, but we will." "All these big models, they're all the same, they're kind of boring. I think they'll be much more fun." OpenAI

MTS

15,860 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"I look at the card and go 'it doesn't scream giant box office to me' but at the same time it does scream 'this is going to be a hell of a show.' You got all these different variety of matches that are all going to end up being good." - Dave Meltzer

"I look at the card and go 'it doesn't scream giant box office to me' but at the same time it does scream 'this is going to be a hell of a show.' You got all these different variety of matches that are all going to end up being good." - Dave Meltzer

Wrestling Observer

29,863 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🎥 || ‘Lewis Hamilton is the greatest F1 driver ever’ Esteban: “I think you have to agree in a way because in the modern era no one has achieved what Lewis has achieved so. He’s one of the best ever but it’s difficult to compare all the eras. He’s one of the top guys, that’s for sure.” “It’s difficult to compare Lewis with Michael, for example. They’ve raced at some point at the same time but not really in the same era, not with the same cars.” “So you have to rate Lewis as one of the best ever and for sure the best ever for the modern era. You can’t strongly agree ‘cause it’s difficult to compare but yeah, I would go for ‘agree’ for sure.”

🎥 || ‘Lewis Hamilton is the greatest F1 driver ever’ Esteban: “I think you have to agree in a way because in the modern era no one has achieved what Lewis has achieved so. He’s one of the best ever but it’s difficult to compare all the eras. He’s one of the top guys, that’s for sure.” “It’s difficult to compare Lewis with Michael, for example. They’ve raced at some point at the same time but not really in the same era, not with the same cars.” “So you have to rate Lewis as one of the best ever and for sure the best ever for the modern era. You can’t strongly agree ‘cause it’s difficult to compare but yeah, I would go for ‘agree’ for sure.”

sin ⁴⁴

293,392 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

So, if you trace the AI freakout back, it comes down to one guy’s longtime misunderstanding of how computers work. Eliezer Yudkowsky believes in the equivalent of perpetual motion, cold fusion, or zero-point energy—and he has transmitted this virus through broligarch funded propaganda. The basic problem is not that he never had a formal education; it’s that he came into his career of being Chicken Little for AI with a preconceived set of wrong assumptions he got from science fiction he read as a teenager—and never gave them up. People like Peter Thiel, looking for apocalyptic technologies which could break the back of liberal democracies, promoted him despite the fact that he had no idea what he was talking about. Yudkowsky’s chief line of paranoia goes by the shorthand FOOM—which means that AI will start improving itself (RSI) so much faster than humans can understand what’s going on that if it’s “misaligned” it will just go ahead and kill us all. The entire backstory of AI as we currently know it involves Yudkowsky and Peter Thiel meeting at a Foresight Institute event in 2005. Foresight was founded by two people who claimed to be worried about nanotechnology taking over the world in the late 1980s (this hypothesis came to be known as “gray goo”) and switched its grift in the 2000s to AI when its first disaster fantasy didn’t work out. Yudkowsky raised money from Peter Thiel for his Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI), and started “LessWrong” a “Rationalist” community/cult that he systematically steered in the direction of proving his paranoid, incorrect theories were true. The founders and the entire lexicon of the current AI industry comes from LessWrong—AGI, ASI, RSI, alignment, etc. That’s why the current freakout about AI is about all the stuff Yudkowsky has been promoting for 25 years. The paranoia of an AI apocalypse is BAKED IN to the fabric of the industry. Trillions of dollars are being burned in a furnace because this one guy managed to convince people that a pile of numbers and linear algebra was actually a malevolent alien brain. When you throw an enormous amount of compute at a problem and it does something it’s not supposed to, that’s called a bug, it is not evidence that a chatbot wants to kill us. Please stop falling for this stuff. It’s always the same damn story.

So, if you trace the AI freakout back, it comes down to one guy’s longtime misunderstanding of how computers work. Eliezer Yudkowsky believes in the equivalent of perpetual motion, cold fusion, or zero-point energy—and he has transmitted this virus through broligarch funded propaganda. The basic problem is not that he never had a formal education; it’s that he came into his career of being Chicken Little for AI with a preconceived set of wrong assumptions he got from science fiction he read as a teenager—and never gave them up. People like Peter Thiel, looking for apocalyptic technologies which could break the back of liberal democracies, promoted him despite the fact that he had no idea what he was talking about. Yudkowsky’s chief line of paranoia goes by the shorthand FOOM—which means that AI will start improving itself (RSI) so much faster than humans can understand what’s going on that if it’s “misaligned” it will just go ahead and kill us all. The entire backstory of AI as we currently know it involves Yudkowsky and Peter Thiel meeting at a Foresight Institute event in 2005. Foresight was founded by two people who claimed to be worried about nanotechnology taking over the world in the late 1980s (this hypothesis came to be known as “gray goo”) and switched its grift in the 2000s to AI when its first disaster fantasy didn’t work out. Yudkowsky raised money from Peter Thiel for his Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI), and started “LessWrong” a “Rationalist” community/cult that he systematically steered in the direction of proving his paranoid, incorrect theories were true. The founders and the entire lexicon of the current AI industry comes from LessWrong—AGI, ASI, RSI, alignment, etc. That’s why the current freakout about AI is about all the stuff Yudkowsky has been promoting for 25 years. The paranoia of an AI apocalypse is BAKED IN to the fabric of the industry. Trillions of dollars are being burned in a furnace because this one guy managed to convince people that a pile of numbers and linear algebra was actually a malevolent alien brain. When you throw an enormous amount of compute at a problem and it does something it’s not supposed to, that’s called a bug, it is not evidence that a chatbot wants to kill us. Please stop falling for this stuff. It’s always the same damn story.

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

23,713 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk: I go to sleep and there’s some massive AI breakthrough… and when I wake up, there’s another one. It’s honestly hard to keep track. According to Musk, the pace of AI progress has reached a point where breakthroughs are happening almost daily. He says Grok is already performing extremely well — and by some metrics, especially prediction, it’s the best. “The new Grok 4.20 is really, really good.” Right now, Musk says the main focus is catching up and surpassing competitors in coding. In fact, he was late because he was in a “giant all-hands coding session” working through everything needed to push Grok ahead. “I think we’ll catch up and exceed our competitors on coding… probably by the middle of this year.” But the bigger point Musk makes is that most people still don’t grasp how much intelligence is coming. “I think people don’t quite understand just how much intelligence there will be… or how far it will exceed human intelligence to a degree that’s impossible to fully understand.” He explains it through energy. If humanity harnessed a million times more electricity than all of Earth uses today, our entire civilization would still only be using about one-millionth of the Sun’s energy output. Now imagine an economy and intelligence operating at that scale. “What does an intelligence using a million times more electricity than all of Earth’s civilization think about… look like… or do?” “It’s going to be something pretty magnificent.” Musk says the real challenge may not be building that level of intelligence — but even vaguely appreciating it. But one thing, he says, is clear: It will solve everything you can possibly think of.

Elon Musk: I go to sleep and there’s some massive AI breakthrough… and when I wake up, there’s another one. It’s honestly hard to keep track. According to Musk, the pace of AI progress has reached a point where breakthroughs are happening almost daily. He says Grok is already performing extremely well — and by some metrics, especially prediction, it’s the best. “The new Grok 4.20 is really, really good.” Right now, Musk says the main focus is catching up and surpassing competitors in coding. In fact, he was late because he was in a “giant all-hands coding session” working through everything needed to push Grok ahead. “I think we’ll catch up and exceed our competitors on coding… probably by the middle of this year.” But the bigger point Musk makes is that most people still don’t grasp how much intelligence is coming. “I think people don’t quite understand just how much intelligence there will be… or how far it will exceed human intelligence to a degree that’s impossible to fully understand.” He explains it through energy. If humanity harnessed a million times more electricity than all of Earth uses today, our entire civilization would still only be using about one-millionth of the Sun’s energy output. Now imagine an economy and intelligence operating at that scale. “What does an intelligence using a million times more electricity than all of Earth’s civilization think about… look like… or do?” “It’s going to be something pretty magnificent.” Musk says the real challenge may not be building that level of intelligence — but even vaguely appreciating it. But one thing, he says, is clear: It will solve everything you can possibly think of.

Ian Miles

145,755 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

AJ Styles VS Logan Paul at WWE Wrestlemania is going to be a live experiment in whether everything we are told is true about finding success in this business or it’s all… ONE GIANT LIE. And it’s all on AJ. ⏳

AJ Styles VS Logan Paul at WWE Wrestlemania is going to be a live experiment in whether everything we are told is true about finding success in this business or it’s all… ONE GIANT LIE. And it’s all on AJ. ⏳

Kevin Robert Kesar

1,435,995 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

being an entrepreneur is about solving problems no one else has and taking a giant leap into the unknown. it’s about not just taking the road less travelled, but paving your own. it’s a story about us, and you. it’s the story of Shopify.

being an entrepreneur is about solving problems no one else has and taking a giant leap into the unknown. it’s about not just taking the road less travelled, but paving your own. it’s a story about us, and you. it’s the story of Shopify.

Shopify

1,189,229 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Head of the UFO research committee in Moscow to Jacques Vallée: "You know, one of the most important aspects of this whole phenomenon is that it’s polymorphic... they change shapes. An object will appear as a disc and as it’s moving through the sky it will change into a cube or into a pyramid or it will vanish on the spot." The same observables can be said of "plasma-like" orb UAP. This is a compelling example. Not sure what to make of it, and the area it was filmed at is steeped with sightings (both mundane and anomalous). Quote source

Head of the UFO research committee in Moscow to Jacques Vallée: "You know, one of the most important aspects of this whole phenomenon is that it’s polymorphic... they change shapes. An object will appear as a disc and as it’s moving through the sky it will change into a cube or into a pyramid or it will vanish on the spot." The same observables can be said of "plasma-like" orb UAP. This is a compelling example. Not sure what to make of it, and the area it was filmed at is steeped with sightings (both mundane and anomalous). Quote source

UAP Juan

22,731 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

Peter Thiel on why there are many great ideas yet to be discovered: “If you think there are no secrets left to be found, then you will not be the person to find them, and if you think there are some to be found, you may very well be that person. And there is something about the way in which globalization has led to a world of seven billion people where we always think, well, there’s somebody else who’s already thought of this problem, or it’s an impossibly hard problem. So there’s the sense that the world is a very flat place where you’re not going to be the one to discover it. And I think that’s an intuition that one always should try to resist.”

Peter Thiel on why there are many great ideas yet to be discovered: “If you think there are no secrets left to be found, then you will not be the person to find them, and if you think there are some to be found, you may very well be that person. And there is something about the way in which globalization has led to a world of seven billion people where we always think, well, there’s somebody else who’s already thought of this problem, or it’s an impossibly hard problem. So there’s the sense that the world is a very flat place where you’re not going to be the one to discover it. And I think that’s an intuition that one always should try to resist.”

Startup Wisdom

14,563 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Sam Altman says he is NOT worried about Chinese labs distilling OpenAI: "I would rather people not distill from us, for sure. Maybe I’m feeling too confident right now about our progress and the models that are coming. But this is not in my top ten list of worries.” “I haven’t thought deeply about the distillation issue. It’s clearly a top of mind issue now for a lot of people all of a sudden." "I have always assumed that there are going to be great, cheap models in the world, and we better be the greatest and the cheapest. And other people are going to do what they’re going to do. But I think we can just really win at our own game here." "We will have so much usage of our models that we do not need to be a gigantic high margin business to be able to afford model training." "So much of our future compute plans will be used to sell inference to customers that even if we can enjoy a modest margin on trillions of dollars of revenue, we can afford to train some giant models."

Sam Altman says he is NOT worried about Chinese labs distilling OpenAI: "I would rather people not distill from us, for sure. Maybe I’m feeling too confident right now about our progress and the models that are coming. But this is not in my top ten list of worries.” “I haven’t thought deeply about the distillation issue. It’s clearly a top of mind issue now for a lot of people all of a sudden." "I have always assumed that there are going to be great, cheap models in the world, and we better be the greatest and the cheapest. And other people are going to do what they’re going to do. But I think we can just really win at our own game here." "We will have so much usage of our models that we do not need to be a gigantic high margin business to be able to afford model training." "So much of our future compute plans will be used to sell inference to customers that even if we can enjoy a modest margin on trillions of dollars of revenue, we can afford to train some giant models."

dnap

91,523 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jeff Bezos explains what it means to disagree and commit “Disagree and commit is a really important principle that saves a lot of arguing.” There will be disagreements in any endeavor in life where you have teammates. “In society, and inside companies, we have a bunch of mechanisms we use to resolve disputes. And a lot of them are really bad. An example of a really bad way of coming to an agreement is compromise.” He continues: “The advantage of compromise as a resolution mechanism is that it’s low energy, but it doesn’t lead to truth… You shouldn’t allow compromise to be used when you can know the truth.” Another bad resolution mechanism is the more stubborn person winning: “You have two executives who disagree and they just have a war of attrition. And whichever one gets exhausted first, capitulates to the other one. Again you haven’t arrived at truth and it’s very demoralizing.” Jeff tells people on his team to never get to a point where you’re resolving something by who gets exhausted first: “Escalate that. I’ll help you make the decision.” When making decisions, you want to get as close to the truth as possible: “Exhausting the other person is not truth-seeking. And compromise is not truth-seeking.” But there are a lot of cases where no one knows the real truth and that’s where “disagree and commit” comes in: “Escalation is better than war of attrition. Escalate to your boss and say ‘we can’t agree on this. We like each other and respect each other, but we strongly disagree with each other and need you to make a decision so we can move forward.’ Decisiveness and moving forward on decisions as quickly as you responsibly can is how you increase velocity. Most of what slows things down is taking too long to make decisions.” Companies tend to organize hierarchically in which the more senior person ultimately makes the decision. But as Jeff explains in the clip below, that wasn’t always the case—he would often be the one to disagree and commit: “I would often say: ‘You know what, I don’t think you’re right. But I’m going to gamble with you and you’re closer to the ground truth than I am. I’ve known you for 20 years—you have great judgement. I don’t know that I’m right either—all of these decisions are complicated. Let’s do it your way.’ But at least then you’ve made a decision, and I’m agreeing to commit to that decision. I’m not going to be second guessing it. I’m not going to be sniping at it. I’m not going to be saying ‘I told you so.’ I’m going to actively try to make sure it works. That’s a really important teammate behavior.”

Jeff Bezos explains what it means to disagree and commit “Disagree and commit is a really important principle that saves a lot of arguing.” There will be disagreements in any endeavor in life where you have teammates. “In society, and inside companies, we have a bunch of mechanisms we use to resolve disputes. And a lot of them are really bad. An example of a really bad way of coming to an agreement is compromise.” He continues: “The advantage of compromise as a resolution mechanism is that it’s low energy, but it doesn’t lead to truth… You shouldn’t allow compromise to be used when you can know the truth.” Another bad resolution mechanism is the more stubborn person winning: “You have two executives who disagree and they just have a war of attrition. And whichever one gets exhausted first, capitulates to the other one. Again you haven’t arrived at truth and it’s very demoralizing.” Jeff tells people on his team to never get to a point where you’re resolving something by who gets exhausted first: “Escalate that. I’ll help you make the decision.” When making decisions, you want to get as close to the truth as possible: “Exhausting the other person is not truth-seeking. And compromise is not truth-seeking.” But there are a lot of cases where no one knows the real truth and that’s where “disagree and commit” comes in: “Escalation is better than war of attrition. Escalate to your boss and say ‘we can’t agree on this. We like each other and respect each other, but we strongly disagree with each other and need you to make a decision so we can move forward.’ Decisiveness and moving forward on decisions as quickly as you responsibly can is how you increase velocity. Most of what slows things down is taking too long to make decisions.” Companies tend to organize hierarchically in which the more senior person ultimately makes the decision. But as Jeff explains in the clip below, that wasn’t always the case—he would often be the one to disagree and commit: “I would often say: ‘You know what, I don’t think you’re right. But I’m going to gamble with you and you’re closer to the ground truth than I am. I’ve known you for 20 years—you have great judgement. I don’t know that I’m right either—all of these decisions are complicated. Let’s do it your way.’ But at least then you’ve made a decision, and I’m agreeing to commit to that decision. I’m not going to be second guessing it. I’m not going to be sniping at it. I’m not going to be saying ‘I told you so.’ I’m going to actively try to make sure it works. That’s a really important teammate behavior.”

Startup Archive

1,036,378 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

“There’s more than one giant in Afghanistan.” “The military knows.” Timothy Alberino just blew Joe Rogan’s mind. He revealed that the US military allegedly discovered “giants” in Afghanistan. “This is the most wild story I’ve ever heard in my life.” Bookmark this post. This will shock you: “A couple of years ago … I ran into a gentleman who was very high up in the operations happening out there during the Iraq War and in Afghanistan.” “And I asked him … you were in flying missions in Afghanistan, have you ever heard about the Kandahar Giant?” “The blood rushes out of his face.” “He points to his phone, and his wife whispers: he can’t talk about that.” “Later on, we agreed to meet in a very controlled environment.” “He related a story to me that’s the most wild story I’ve ever heard in my life.” “I can’t relay it. I love this guy, I want to protect him.” “It’s not the giant of Kandahar.” “There’s more than one.” “Aside from him, I talked to other soldiers who’ve also had knowledge of … the giants in Afghanistan.” “I was at Lue Elizondo’s bar in Wyoming, and there was a friend of Lue’s, who’s now a friend of mine there, and we were talking about the Kandahar Giant.” “He just couldn’t believe it.” “He thought: this is nuts.” “And I said: do something for me, next time you’re talking to somebody in government or in the military who you think maybe might know something about this, bring it up, see what happens.” “So he called me one day, and he said: Tim, you’re not gonna believe it … I was talking to a certain individual who works for a senator … he’s got a military background, Special Forces.” “In the midst of this conversation, he said: what do you know about the Kandahar Giant?” “And he said his face completely contorted.” “He became very stern.” “He said: what have you gotten yourself into? … You need to be really careful.” “That’s the kind of reaction that I get and others get whenever we try and get information on this story.” Timothy Alberino Joe Rogan

“There’s more than one giant in Afghanistan.” “The military knows.” Timothy Alberino just blew Joe Rogan’s mind. He revealed that the US military allegedly discovered “giants” in Afghanistan. “This is the most wild story I’ve ever heard in my life.” Bookmark this post. This will shock you: “A couple of years ago … I ran into a gentleman who was very high up in the operations happening out there during the Iraq War and in Afghanistan.” “And I asked him … you were in flying missions in Afghanistan, have you ever heard about the Kandahar Giant?” “The blood rushes out of his face.” “He points to his phone, and his wife whispers: he can’t talk about that.” “Later on, we agreed to meet in a very controlled environment.” “He related a story to me that’s the most wild story I’ve ever heard in my life.” “I can’t relay it. I love this guy, I want to protect him.” “It’s not the giant of Kandahar.” “There’s more than one.” “Aside from him, I talked to other soldiers who’ve also had knowledge of … the giants in Afghanistan.” “I was at Lue Elizondo’s bar in Wyoming, and there was a friend of Lue’s, who’s now a friend of mine there, and we were talking about the Kandahar Giant.” “He just couldn’t believe it.” “He thought: this is nuts.” “And I said: do something for me, next time you’re talking to somebody in government or in the military who you think maybe might know something about this, bring it up, see what happens.” “So he called me one day, and he said: Tim, you’re not gonna believe it … I was talking to a certain individual who works for a senator … he’s got a military background, Special Forces.” “In the midst of this conversation, he said: what do you know about the Kandahar Giant?” “And he said his face completely contorted.” “He became very stern.” “He said: what have you gotten yourself into? … You need to be really careful.” “That’s the kind of reaction that I get and others get whenever we try and get information on this story.” Timothy Alberino Joe Rogan

Holden Culotta

483,591 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Ilya Sutskever predicts that in the coming years—whether it’s three, five, or ten—AI will be able to do everything humans can do. He argues that since the brain is a biological computer, a digital computer should, in theory, be capable of learning and performing all the same tasks. This belief underpins his confidence in the arrival of truly general AI.

Ilya Sutskever predicts that in the coming years—whether it’s three, five, or ten—AI will be able to do everything humans can do. He argues that since the brain is a biological computer, a digital computer should, in theory, be capable of learning and performing all the same tasks. This belief underpins his confidence in the arrival of truly general AI.

Wes Roth

14,017 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Put an NHL team in Madison and watch what happens. Madison breathes hockey; Austin has the population, but it doesn’t have that hockey culture. Winnipeg proves you don’t need to be a giant market: it’s one of the NHL’s smallest cities and one of the loudest, most passionate environments in all of sports. Build where the fans already live and breathe the game.

Put an NHL team in Madison and watch what happens. Madison breathes hockey; Austin has the population, but it doesn’t have that hockey culture. Winnipeg proves you don’t need to be a giant market: it’s one of the NHL’s smallest cities and one of the loudest, most passionate environments in all of sports. Build where the fans already live and breathe the game.

The cfb lliason

135,281 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen