Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Between 2012 and 2024, Somali piracy was effectively neutralized, with no major attacks reported for years. But that has changed. In 2025, the waters off the Horn of Africa are once again becoming a hotspot. In 2025, Somali pirates are re-emerging, taking advantage of the chaos created by the...

MusaaRonalds's profile picture

Musa Ronalds

9,057 subscribers

212,531 просмотров • 4 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🇸🇴 Is piracy making a comeback in the Horn of Africa? While the world is locked onto the Middle East, Somali pirates are quietly moving again. At least 4 ships have been hit recently in Somali waters. Speed, surprise, and coastal cover doing the work. 3 years ago, piracy in this region was nearly dead. International naval operations had choked it out. But those same naval forces are now stretched toward the Strait of Hormuz, and the vacuum they left behind is being filled fast. Between 2005 and 2012, Horn of Africa pirates extracted up to $430 million in ransoms. Source: DW News
1:27

🇸🇴 Is piracy making a comeback in the Horn of Africa? While the world is locked onto the Middle East, Somali pirates are quietly moving again. At least 4 ships have been hit recently in Somali waters. Speed, surprise, and coastal cover doing the work. 3 years ago, piracy in this region was nearly dead. International naval operations had choked it out. But those same naval forces are now stretched toward the Strait of Hormuz, and the vacuum they left behind is being filled fast. Between 2005 and 2012, Horn of Africa pirates extracted up to $430 million in ransoms. Source: DW News

Mario Nawfal

34,916 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Somali pirates conducted the most hijackings in Somali waters in a 10-day period since the end of the peak of the Somali piracy crisis in 2012. CTP Africa Analyst Michael DeAngelo explains what this means and why this is significant. ⬇️
0:47

Somali pirates conducted the most hijackings in Somali waters in a 10-day period since the end of the peak of the Somali piracy crisis in 2012. CTP Africa Analyst Michael DeAngelo explains what this means and why this is significant. ⬇️

Critical Threats

23,152 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🔥 Stephen Miller is DIRECTLY calling out the Somali pirates in Minnesota for DESTROYING our honor-based welfare system "What's happened to our country is we became a society, as you've seen with the Somali refugee problem in Minnesota, where you have a large number of people that are NOT following the honor system. They're NOT playing by the rules. They're NOT abiding by our laws, and the amount that has been fleeced from us is in the HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars." THEY ALL. MUST. GO.
1:32

🔥 Stephen Miller is DIRECTLY calling out the Somali pirates in Minnesota for DESTROYING our honor-based welfare system "What's happened to our country is we became a society, as you've seen with the Somali refugee problem in Minnesota, where you have a large number of people that are NOT following the honor system. They're NOT playing by the rules. They're NOT abiding by our laws, and the amount that has been fleeced from us is in the HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars." THEY ALL. MUST. GO.

Nick Sortor

71,317 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

STAGED PIRACY: HOW WESTERN MEDIA USED KENYANs, ETHIOPIANs, AND OTHER AFRICANS AS ACTORS TO DEFAME SOMALIA AND SEIZE ITS SEAS. Since the mid-2000s, we have been exposed to various images and reports on television regarding what has emerged as a significant global concern labeled "Somali pirates." However, are you aware that this stories was orchestrated to deceive the world and exploit Somali waters? If you are not; I encourage you to watch and read the article so to learn from the actors themselves. Those orchestrators who financed the derogatory narratives aimed at discrediting Somalia have vested interests in Somali waters, driven by a mix of economic and strategic motivations. Notably, organizations such as #CNN, #BBC, #DW, #Nytimes, #TheIndependent, #DanishMagazine, along with various Western NGOs, enlisted individuals from Kenya, Ethiopia, and the islands of East Africa to portray and act as Somali pirates. It was a project part of a broader strategy to damage Somalia's reputation and secure dominance over its waters and the Indian Ocean. The cows used for the act were driven by few pennies from these big criminal organizations. In their guise as "Somali pirates", the cows even took on Somali names like "Bashir, Adan, Osman, Jama, Rashid" etc. as part of the play, though non of them are even Somali. Additionally, as they will proof, non of them ever been to Somalia or even learned where it is in the geography map. #PiracyPlay #Media #Kenya #Ethiopia #Somalisea #redsea #USAID #Africa #EastAfrica #Somalipeninsula
2:26

STAGED PIRACY: HOW WESTERN MEDIA USED KENYANs, ETHIOPIANs, AND OTHER AFRICANS AS ACTORS TO DEFAME SOMALIA AND SEIZE ITS SEAS. Since the mid-2000s, we have been exposed to various images and reports on television regarding what has emerged as a significant global concern labeled "Somali pirates." However, are you aware that this stories was orchestrated to deceive the world and exploit Somali waters? If you are not; I encourage you to watch and read the article so to learn from the actors themselves. Those orchestrators who financed the derogatory narratives aimed at discrediting Somalia have vested interests in Somali waters, driven by a mix of economic and strategic motivations. Notably, organizations such as #CNN, #BBC, #DW, #Nytimes, #TheIndependent, #DanishMagazine, along with various Western NGOs, enlisted individuals from Kenya, Ethiopia, and the islands of East Africa to portray and act as Somali pirates. It was a project part of a broader strategy to damage Somalia's reputation and secure dominance over its waters and the Indian Ocean. The cows used for the act were driven by few pennies from these big criminal organizations. In their guise as "Somali pirates", the cows even took on Somali names like "Bashir, Adan, Osman, Jama, Rashid" etc. as part of the play, though non of them are even Somali. Additionally, as they will proof, non of them ever been to Somalia or even learned where it is in the geography map. #PiracyPlay #Media #Kenya #Ethiopia #Somalisea #redsea #USAID #Africa #EastAfrica #Somalipeninsula

Mohamed Olad

14,684 просмотров • 1 год назад

More than a dozen sailors, the majority from Pakistan, are being held by Somali pirates as hijackings and harassment surge in the wake of the US-Israeli war on Iran.
1:18

More than a dozen sailors, the majority from Pakistan, are being held by Somali pirates as hijackings and harassment surge in the wake of the US-Israeli war on Iran.

Al Jazeera English

23,974 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The visit of Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, accompanied by Prime Minister Hamza Abdi Barre, to the city of Las Anod today,the first of its kind by a Somali president in 42 years since Siad Barre’s visit, represents, in my view, a strategic and historic turning point. It is a masterstroke and a resounding slap to the 'Somaliland' secessionist project, as well as a firm response to the recent Israeli recognition that sought to legitimize division. ​Las Anod, the historic heart of the Sool region, has chosen Somali unity, rejected secessionist occupation, and expelled the Hargeisa administration after bloody battles, establishing the SSC-Khatumo federal state under Mogadishu’s authority. ​This visit serves as a sovereign declaration in bold: that the territorial integrity of Somalia is a red line and is not subject to division. The arrival of the federal leadership in the heart of Sool province is a de facto field recognition of the victory of the local population's will. ​Undoubtedly, this visit is a courageous national step that reflects the unity of Somali lands and the state's commitment to direct communication with its citizens in all regions. Here, the Somali state tells the world that it has returned to its northern lands, and that secession has ended,both politically and practically,upon the rock of Las Anod’s steadfastness.
1:20

The visit of Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, accompanied by Prime Minister Hamza Abdi Barre, to the city of Las Anod today,the first of its kind by a Somali president in 42 years since Siad Barre’s visit, represents, in my view, a strategic and historic turning point. It is a masterstroke and a resounding slap to the 'Somaliland' secessionist project, as well as a firm response to the recent Israeli recognition that sought to legitimize division. ​Las Anod, the historic heart of the Sool region, has chosen Somali unity, rejected secessionist occupation, and expelled the Hargeisa administration after bloody battles, establishing the SSC-Khatumo federal state under Mogadishu’s authority. ​This visit serves as a sovereign declaration in bold: that the territorial integrity of Somalia is a red line and is not subject to division. The arrival of the federal leadership in the heart of Sool province is a de facto field recognition of the victory of the local population's will. ​Undoubtedly, this visit is a courageous national step that reflects the unity of Somali lands and the state's commitment to direct communication with its citizens in all regions. Here, the Somali state tells the world that it has returned to its northern lands, and that secession has ended,both politically and practically,upon the rock of Las Anod’s steadfastness.

khaled mahmoued

15,506 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The IDF has Launched a Preemptive Strike Against Iran's Nuclear Program, Israeli military spokesperson Effie Defrin: For years, the Iranian regime has been waging a direct and indirect campaign of terror against the State of Israel, by funding and directing terrorist activities via its proxies across the Middle East, while advancing toward obtaining a nuclear weapon. The Iranian regime is at the head of the axis responsible for all terrorist attacks against the State of Israel since the beginning of the "Swords of Iron" War, including by arming and funding the Hamas terror organization which was responsible for the October 7th Massacre. During the "Swords of Iron" War, Iran even directly attacked Israel twice, firing hundreds of missiles toward the State of Israel. The Iranian regime has proclaimed that its objective is to destroy the State of Israel. Senior officials in the Iranian regime have publicly declared their intent to destroy Israel, and are operating to achieve this together with their proxies in the Middle East. Today, Iran is closer than ever to obtaining a nuclear weapon. Weapons of mass destruction in the hands of the Iranian regime are an existential threat to the State of Israel and a significant threat to the wider world. The State of Israel will not allow a regime whose objective is to destroy the State of Israel to obtain weapons of mass destruction. The IDF has conducted a process of preparations for a campaign on the frontline and on the home front. The resilience of Israel's citizens will be an important factor of the campaign. The IDF is ready to continue to act as required. The State of Israel has the obligation to act in defense of its citizens and will continue to do so everywhere it is required to do so, as we have done in the past.
1:10

The IDF has Launched a Preemptive Strike Against Iran's Nuclear Program, Israeli military spokesperson Effie Defrin: For years, the Iranian regime has been waging a direct and indirect campaign of terror against the State of Israel, by funding and directing terrorist activities via its proxies across the Middle East, while advancing toward obtaining a nuclear weapon. The Iranian regime is at the head of the axis responsible for all terrorist attacks against the State of Israel since the beginning of the "Swords of Iron" War, including by arming and funding the Hamas terror organization which was responsible for the October 7th Massacre. During the "Swords of Iron" War, Iran even directly attacked Israel twice, firing hundreds of missiles toward the State of Israel. The Iranian regime has proclaimed that its objective is to destroy the State of Israel. Senior officials in the Iranian regime have publicly declared their intent to destroy Israel, and are operating to achieve this together with their proxies in the Middle East. Today, Iran is closer than ever to obtaining a nuclear weapon. Weapons of mass destruction in the hands of the Iranian regime are an existential threat to the State of Israel and a significant threat to the wider world. The State of Israel will not allow a regime whose objective is to destroy the State of Israel to obtain weapons of mass destruction. The IDF has conducted a process of preparations for a campaign on the frontline and on the home front. The resilience of Israel's citizens will be an important factor of the campaign. The IDF is ready to continue to act as required. The State of Israel has the obligation to act in defense of its citizens and will continue to do so everywhere it is required to do so, as we have done in the past.

Joe Truzman

15,336 просмотров • 1 год назад

Somalia is a failed state and a source of piracy in the Arabian Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Israel and #Somaliland cooperate to resist the Iranian web of aggression, including from the Houthi terrorists. My interview on NewsX World
2:01

Somalia is a failed state and a source of piracy in the Arabian Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Israel and #Somaliland cooperate to resist the Iranian web of aggression, including from the Houthi terrorists. My interview on NewsX World

Emmanuel Navon · עמנואל נבון · エマニュエル・ナボン 🇮🇱

19,033 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

With the sea breeze gently blowing and the interplay of lights, the 2025 Xiamen International Fashion Week has arrived in this seaside garden city embraced by the sound of waves. Together, let's indulge in a feast of light and shadow. It is reported that this year's #Xiamen #International #Fashion #Week will continue until the 19th, with a total of 14 distinctive events to be held.
0:31

With the sea breeze gently blowing and the interplay of lights, the 2025 Xiamen International Fashion Week has arrived in this seaside garden city embraced by the sound of waves. Together, let's indulge in a feast of light and shadow. It is reported that this year's #Xiamen #International #Fashion #Week will continue until the 19th, with a total of 14 distinctive events to be held.

Xiamen China

19,170 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Tension and uncertainty among Russians are growing. In the spring of 2026, Russian polling agencies recorded a noticeable decline in several key indicators: approval of Putin's performance, trust in him, and the overall emotional mood. The most intriguing point was the closure of Russian Public Opinion Research Center’s (VCIOM) open trust rating: when respondents are asked to name politicians they trust without being prompted with names. In March 2026, this indicator for Putin fell to 29.5% - the lowest level since the start of the full-scale war. After that, VCIOM did not publish the figures for April and May. The gap between the open trust rating (29.5%) and the closed trust rating (72-73%) is roughly 1:2.5. It reflects the distance between Putin's actual political weight and the ritual of loyalty to the "tsar." The reason is simple: Russians do not want a loser president. Putin's ratings were sustained not simply by war, but by the prospect of a victorious war. He traded Russia's development and prosperity for greatness, but now Russians see neither greatness nor prosperity. Let’s take a closer look at what is happening within Russian society. First, most Russians continue to support the war. This is illustrated by Levada Center's May data. Support for the actions of the Russian army, which had been declining since the end of last year, suddenly rebounded by six points in May, reaching 74%. At the same time, the share of those favoring peace negotiations, which had remained at around two-thirds since December, has been slowly shrinking for three consecutive months - down seven points, to six out of ten. Meanwhile, the camp supporting the continuation of military operations has grown to 30%. The main motive among supporters of peace has not changed: "too many casualties and heavy losses." What happened? Television stopped talking about peace negotiations. As long as negotiations seemed realistic, peace appeared to be a way out. Once they collapsed, part of Russian society obediently switched back to supporting the war. This is conformism. Russians do not want peace or war - they want to be on the side of the winner. The demand for negotiations was, in fact, a demand for a victorious peace. Since no victorious peace was granted, they have taken back the war. However, there is a dangerous trap here for the Kremlin: Russians agree to war, but not to a war without victory. They agree to anything except a compromise that would be perceived as defeat. This is dangerous for the Kremlin because it calls into question the legitimacy of the entire system of power - and Putin above all - if Russian society is no longer given proof of greatness and victory. Putin is doomed to constant escalation. The situation is further complicated by public fatigue and rising anxiety among Russians. The state of the Russian economy is deteriorating, while the defense sector is no longer able to offset the decline in the civilian economy. This is especially noticeable in the regions. By the end of 2025, the deficit of consolidated regional budgets had reached a record 1.48 trillion rubles ($20.56 billion) - 3.6 times more than a year earlier. Seventy-four regions, including Moscow and the oil and gas districts, ended up in deficit. The first months of 2026 did not reverse the trend: industry is stagnating, construction is shrinking, corporate profits are falling, and debt burdens are increasing. The accompanying symptoms include a sharp rise in wage arrears, large-scale revisions of regional budgets for 2026 involving spending cuts, primarily social, as well as a hidden employment crisis - where there is no work, but employees are not laid off; instead, they are shifted to reduced working weeks and unpaid leave. Official unemployment statistics barely reflect this. Yet since December 2025, part-time employment has been rising at large and medium-sized enterprises: 4.6 million out of 33 million workers. The map of Russian society’s concerns, which the Levada Center publishes annually, looks telling in May 2026. At the top - for twenty years in a row - is rising prices: 55%. The "special military operation" and related issues worry 35%. And then comes the most interesting part - the destruction of a comfortable life and the feeling of war at home have become additional drivers of tension: fear of explosions and terrorist attacks has jumped by 8 points since November - to 27%. One in five (22%) cites internet restrictions and the blocking of social media as among the most pressing issues - on the list of problems, the digital blockade now ranks alongside poverty and lack of access to healthcare (both at 19%). The state has managed to turn a disabled messenger app into a social problem on the level of poverty. That takes some doing. Many Western observers have been inspired by rumors of elite dissatisfaction in Russia. Indeed, Moscow's economic circles have seen unusually open criticism of the government from parts of the financial elite. However, I suggest we avoid wishful thinking: no direct scenario of a political crisis emerges from this data. The most realistic scenario is the continuation of the war, coupled with a search for political doping: events that can be sold to society as victories, as proof that Russia is moving in the right direction. The problem is that the bar has risen - what would have been considered a triumph a year ago would now look like capitulation. Therefore, stronger doses of doping will be required: escalation in Ukraine aimed at maximizing destruction, a military adventure somewhere in Europe, new strikes, nuclear signaling, or provocations against the West. The ground has already been prepared: 54% of Russians believe that the war in Ukraine could escalate into an armed conflict with NATO - half the population is living in anticipation of a major war. The Kremlin’s logic is as old as time: unite through fear. Putin may also be saved by an "unexpected event" - a black swan, as has already happened when the U.S. started a war with Iran. Here, it’s not even necessary to do anything: it’s enough to interpret it skillfully. A U.S. defeat or stalemate in the war with Iran could be presented as a victory of Russia and its allies over America - because in the minds of Russians, the war with Ukraine has long been just a fragment of a larger Russian war with the West. Within this worldview, any failure by Washington automatically counts as a point for Moscow, regardless of whether it had a hand in it. There is also a third scenario - not for Putin, but against him. This is not a scenario of popular uprising, but one of self-preservation by the Russian elites. But such an option is possible only under a sharp convergence of several factors: military defeat, economic collapse, the loss of the ability to allocate resources, and the emergence of a figure or group capable of guaranteeing the elite’s security after the transition. So far, there are few such signs.
1:54

Tension and uncertainty among Russians are growing. In the spring of 2026, Russian polling agencies recorded a noticeable decline in several key indicators: approval of Putin's performance, trust in him, and the overall emotional mood. The most intriguing point was the closure of Russian Public Opinion Research Center’s (VCIOM) open trust rating: when respondents are asked to name politicians they trust without being prompted with names. In March 2026, this indicator for Putin fell to 29.5% - the lowest level since the start of the full-scale war. After that, VCIOM did not publish the figures for April and May. The gap between the open trust rating (29.5%) and the closed trust rating (72-73%) is roughly 1:2.5. It reflects the distance between Putin's actual political weight and the ritual of loyalty to the "tsar." The reason is simple: Russians do not want a loser president. Putin's ratings were sustained not simply by war, but by the prospect of a victorious war. He traded Russia's development and prosperity for greatness, but now Russians see neither greatness nor prosperity. Let’s take a closer look at what is happening within Russian society. First, most Russians continue to support the war. This is illustrated by Levada Center's May data. Support for the actions of the Russian army, which had been declining since the end of last year, suddenly rebounded by six points in May, reaching 74%. At the same time, the share of those favoring peace negotiations, which had remained at around two-thirds since December, has been slowly shrinking for three consecutive months - down seven points, to six out of ten. Meanwhile, the camp supporting the continuation of military operations has grown to 30%. The main motive among supporters of peace has not changed: "too many casualties and heavy losses." What happened? Television stopped talking about peace negotiations. As long as negotiations seemed realistic, peace appeared to be a way out. Once they collapsed, part of Russian society obediently switched back to supporting the war. This is conformism. Russians do not want peace or war - they want to be on the side of the winner. The demand for negotiations was, in fact, a demand for a victorious peace. Since no victorious peace was granted, they have taken back the war. However, there is a dangerous trap here for the Kremlin: Russians agree to war, but not to a war without victory. They agree to anything except a compromise that would be perceived as defeat. This is dangerous for the Kremlin because it calls into question the legitimacy of the entire system of power - and Putin above all - if Russian society is no longer given proof of greatness and victory. Putin is doomed to constant escalation. The situation is further complicated by public fatigue and rising anxiety among Russians. The state of the Russian economy is deteriorating, while the defense sector is no longer able to offset the decline in the civilian economy. This is especially noticeable in the regions. By the end of 2025, the deficit of consolidated regional budgets had reached a record 1.48 trillion rubles ($20.56 billion) - 3.6 times more than a year earlier. Seventy-four regions, including Moscow and the oil and gas districts, ended up in deficit. The first months of 2026 did not reverse the trend: industry is stagnating, construction is shrinking, corporate profits are falling, and debt burdens are increasing. The accompanying symptoms include a sharp rise in wage arrears, large-scale revisions of regional budgets for 2026 involving spending cuts, primarily social, as well as a hidden employment crisis - where there is no work, but employees are not laid off; instead, they are shifted to reduced working weeks and unpaid leave. Official unemployment statistics barely reflect this. Yet since December 2025, part-time employment has been rising at large and medium-sized enterprises: 4.6 million out of 33 million workers. The map of Russian society’s concerns, which the Levada Center publishes annually, looks telling in May 2026. At the top - for twenty years in a row - is rising prices: 55%. The "special military operation" and related issues worry 35%. And then comes the most interesting part - the destruction of a comfortable life and the feeling of war at home have become additional drivers of tension: fear of explosions and terrorist attacks has jumped by 8 points since November - to 27%. One in five (22%) cites internet restrictions and the blocking of social media as among the most pressing issues - on the list of problems, the digital blockade now ranks alongside poverty and lack of access to healthcare (both at 19%). The state has managed to turn a disabled messenger app into a social problem on the level of poverty. That takes some doing. Many Western observers have been inspired by rumors of elite dissatisfaction in Russia. Indeed, Moscow's economic circles have seen unusually open criticism of the government from parts of the financial elite. However, I suggest we avoid wishful thinking: no direct scenario of a political crisis emerges from this data. The most realistic scenario is the continuation of the war, coupled with a search for political doping: events that can be sold to society as victories, as proof that Russia is moving in the right direction. The problem is that the bar has risen - what would have been considered a triumph a year ago would now look like capitulation. Therefore, stronger doses of doping will be required: escalation in Ukraine aimed at maximizing destruction, a military adventure somewhere in Europe, new strikes, nuclear signaling, or provocations against the West. The ground has already been prepared: 54% of Russians believe that the war in Ukraine could escalate into an armed conflict with NATO - half the population is living in anticipation of a major war. The Kremlin’s logic is as old as time: unite through fear. Putin may also be saved by an "unexpected event" - a black swan, as has already happened when the U.S. started a war with Iran. Here, it’s not even necessary to do anything: it’s enough to interpret it skillfully. A U.S. defeat or stalemate in the war with Iran could be presented as a victory of Russia and its allies over America - because in the minds of Russians, the war with Ukraine has long been just a fragment of a larger Russian war with the West. Within this worldview, any failure by Washington automatically counts as a point for Moscow, regardless of whether it had a hand in it. There is also a third scenario - not for Putin, but against him. This is not a scenario of popular uprising, but one of self-preservation by the Russian elites. But such an option is possible only under a sharp convergence of several factors: military defeat, economic collapse, the loss of the ability to allocate resources, and the emergence of a figure or group capable of guaranteeing the elite’s security after the transition. So far, there are few such signs.

Anton Gerashchenko

36,205 просмотров • 26 дней назад

"Why are you guys having a problem with the Somali community?" "The biggest mall in Dakar is owned by a Somali. The biggest mall in Lusaka is owned by a Somali. The biggest mall in Lubumbashi is owned by a Somali. You guys have a phobia of Somali. And by the way, you'll go to the grave with that phobia" Kenya's Health Cabinet Secretary, Hon. Aden Duale, EGH
1:56

"Why are you guys having a problem with the Somali community?" "The biggest mall in Dakar is owned by a Somali. The biggest mall in Lusaka is owned by a Somali. The biggest mall in Lubumbashi is owned by a Somali. You guys have a phobia of Somali. And by the way, you'll go to the grave with that phobia" Kenya's Health Cabinet Secretary, Hon. Aden Duale, EGH

Dalsan TV

35,238 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.
6:07

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

21,983 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

We announce to the whole world, everyone should know that we, the Jews, declare that the state of Israel is not a Jewish state, but a murderer and genocidal Zionist state, and that it has been committing genocide against the Palestinian people for 75 years. The Jewish community in the Holy Land has struggled with Zionism and its perverted ideas since the first day Zionism emerged and continues to do so. There are thousands of Jews in the world who are against Zionism, everyone should know this well: Jews are not Zionists, Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not the state of the Jews. Israel is a terrorist and genocidal state. We stand with the Palestinian people and pray for the establishment of a free Palestinian state.
3:07

We announce to the whole world, everyone should know that we, the Jews, declare that the state of Israel is not a Jewish state, but a murderer and genocidal Zionist state, and that it has been committing genocide against the Palestinian people for 75 years. The Jewish community in the Holy Land has struggled with Zionism and its perverted ideas since the first day Zionism emerged and continues to do so. There are thousands of Jews in the world who are against Zionism, everyone should know this well: Jews are not Zionists, Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not the state of the Jews. Israel is a terrorist and genocidal state. We stand with the Palestinian people and pray for the establishment of a free Palestinian state.

Voice of Rabbis

781,802 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Hamas leader Khaled Mashal: “We do not accept the two state solution.” — January 22, 2024 “I would like to say two things about the two-state solution. First, we have nothing to do with the two-state solution. We reject this notion, because it means you would get a promise for a [Palestinian] state, yet you are required to recognize the legitimacy of the other state, which is the Zionist entity. This is unacceptable. We demand to be liberated, to get rid of the occupation, and to have our independence, and our state. [Israel] is my enemy. It is not my concern." “Obviously, the position of Hamas, and the position of the vast majority of the Palestinian people, especially following October 7, I believe that the dream and the hope for Palestine from the River to the Sea, and from the north to the south, has been renewed. This has also become a slogan chanted in the U.S., and in western capital cities, by the American and Western public.” “Hamas agreed to a completely independent (Palestinian) state, with the 1967 borders, with Jerusalem as its capital, with the Right of Return included without recognizing the legitimacy of the Zionist entity. This position was meant to facilitate Palestinian and Arab agreement at this stage, but without relinquishing any of our rights or any part of our land, and without recognizing Israel. Our vision remains unchanged. I believe that October 7 has enhanced this conviction, has narrowed the disagreements, and has turned the idea of liberating Palestine from the River to the Sea into a realistic idea that has already begun. It is not something merely to be expected or hoped for, It is part of the plan, part of the agenda, and we are standing on its threshold, Allah willing.” TRANSLATED BY MEMRI Source:
1:16

Hamas leader Khaled Mashal: “We do not accept the two state solution.” — January 22, 2024 “I would like to say two things about the two-state solution. First, we have nothing to do with the two-state solution. We reject this notion, because it means you would get a promise for a [Palestinian] state, yet you are required to recognize the legitimacy of the other state, which is the Zionist entity. This is unacceptable. We demand to be liberated, to get rid of the occupation, and to have our independence, and our state. [Israel] is my enemy. It is not my concern." “Obviously, the position of Hamas, and the position of the vast majority of the Palestinian people, especially following October 7, I believe that the dream and the hope for Palestine from the River to the Sea, and from the north to the south, has been renewed. This has also become a slogan chanted in the U.S., and in western capital cities, by the American and Western public.” “Hamas agreed to a completely independent (Palestinian) state, with the 1967 borders, with Jerusalem as its capital, with the Right of Return included without recognizing the legitimacy of the Zionist entity. This position was meant to facilitate Palestinian and Arab agreement at this stage, but without relinquishing any of our rights or any part of our land, and without recognizing Israel. Our vision remains unchanged. I believe that October 7 has enhanced this conviction, has narrowed the disagreements, and has turned the idea of liberating Palestine from the River to the Sea into a realistic idea that has already begun. It is not something merely to be expected or hoped for, It is part of the plan, part of the agenda, and we are standing on its threshold, Allah willing.” TRANSLATED BY MEMRI Source:

dan linnaeus

96,479 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🇱🇧 Lebanon has been hit with one of the largest waves of Israeli airstrikes since the escalation began. Civilians are bearing the brunt of the attacks. When the UN has to remind the world that “civilians are not a target” in 2026… that’s not a good sign. The human cost in Lebanon is climbing fast. 💔 Source: UN
0:04

🇱🇧 Lebanon has been hit with one of the largest waves of Israeli airstrikes since the escalation began. Civilians are bearing the brunt of the attacks. When the UN has to remind the world that “civilians are not a target” in 2026… that’s not a good sign. The human cost in Lebanon is climbing fast. 💔 Source: UN

Mario Nawfal

126,381 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

RFK Jr puts the measles hysteria to bed. “This has become a talking point for Democrats that somehow I caused the measles epidemic. The measles epidemic started in January 2025 - before I came into office.” “Most of the people affected are over the age of 5 years old, meaning their decision to not vaccinate predated my appointment to this office. We had about 2,200 measles cases last year and we had 1,700 this year. This is not unique to the United States. This is a global outbreak. Mexico had 3x the number of measles cases than we did. We did better than any other country in the world at controlling the epidemic. Mexico has 3x the number and it has 1/3 of the population. Canada has twice the number and it has 1/8 of our population. Europe had 33,000 cases in the last year and a 127,000 the year before and they have one half of our population. So the problem is not me.”
2:45

RFK Jr puts the measles hysteria to bed. “This has become a talking point for Democrats that somehow I caused the measles epidemic. The measles epidemic started in January 2025 - before I came into office.” “Most of the people affected are over the age of 5 years old, meaning their decision to not vaccinate predated my appointment to this office. We had about 2,200 measles cases last year and we had 1,700 this year. This is not unique to the United States. This is a global outbreak. Mexico had 3x the number of measles cases than we did. We did better than any other country in the world at controlling the epidemic. Mexico has 3x the number and it has 1/3 of the population. Canada has twice the number and it has 1/8 of our population. Europe had 33,000 cases in the last year and a 127,000 the year before and they have one half of our population. So the problem is not me.”

Anna Matson

529,842 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇹🇷 🤝🇸🇴Efforts to externally divide Somalia are moving in clear opposition to the social and political realities on the ground. The clashes that previously occurred in Las Anod did not bring stability to the former administration. Instead, they resulted in governance weaknesses, a loss of legitimacy, and political failure. Continuing a similar discourse today in Hargeisa would amount to nothing more than repeating the same mistake. Las Anod’s decision to separate from Somaliland and declare its affiliation with the Federal Republic of Somalia is not merely a local decision. It constitutes a strategic response by the Somali people in favor of unity rather than fragmentation. Similar messages emerging from Awdal further demonstrate that this trend is structural rather than temporary. While external actors seeking to fragment Somalia remain active, the emergence of a strong willingness among significant segments of the Somali population to integrate into the central federal structure is noteworthy. What we are witnessing in Somalia today is the reversal of the classic “divide-and-rule” approach: divide, fragment, and reunify. In this context, the presence of the Somali President and Prime Minister, alongside Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Sudan, standing with the Somali people in Las Anod was not merely symbolic. It conveyed a clear message in support of Somalia’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, and political unity. As it has in the past, Türkiye will continue to stand by the will, unity, and sovereignty of the Somali people.
0:32

🇹🇷 🤝🇸🇴Efforts to externally divide Somalia are moving in clear opposition to the social and political realities on the ground. The clashes that previously occurred in Las Anod did not bring stability to the former administration. Instead, they resulted in governance weaknesses, a loss of legitimacy, and political failure. Continuing a similar discourse today in Hargeisa would amount to nothing more than repeating the same mistake. Las Anod’s decision to separate from Somaliland and declare its affiliation with the Federal Republic of Somalia is not merely a local decision. It constitutes a strategic response by the Somali people in favor of unity rather than fragmentation. Similar messages emerging from Awdal further demonstrate that this trend is structural rather than temporary. While external actors seeking to fragment Somalia remain active, the emergence of a strong willingness among significant segments of the Somali population to integrate into the central federal structure is noteworthy. What we are witnessing in Somalia today is the reversal of the classic “divide-and-rule” approach: divide, fragment, and reunify. In this context, the presence of the Somali President and Prime Minister, alongside Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Sudan, standing with the Somali people in Las Anod was not merely symbolic. It conveyed a clear message in support of Somalia’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, and political unity. As it has in the past, Türkiye will continue to stand by the will, unity, and sovereignty of the Somali people.

Tunç Demirtaş

22,887 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад