正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
BEWARE: The Media and Evolutionists have already begun to “debunk” Noah’s Ark before our samples have even arrived at the lab. This being the most blatant example of the lying. No test results have come back, because no lab testing has been completed yet. They are again, referencing a... show more
40 条评论

Hey don’t get me wrong, rooting for you, but…… if no studies have been completed, how on Gods great earth are you proclaiming victory?

Because I know

@Sammythewammy2 Well, I know a worldwide flood is impossible. Finding an Ark will provide evidence of a regional flood (and there were plenty of those). It will NOT provide ANY evidence of a worldwide flood. @grok, please estimate how many animal species existed on 🌎 in approximately 5000 BC.

Around 5000 BC animal species numbered roughly the same as today: about 7-8 million. Speciation typically takes hundreds of thousands to millions of years, so almost none occurred in 7000 years. Background extinctions were minimal; human-driven losses (mainly large vertebrates and some island endemics) affected a tiny fraction of total diversity, which is dominated by insects and other invertebrates.

@LaurenWitzkeDE @Sammythewammy2 Thanks! How many species of mammals existed back then?

Around 5000 BC, mammal species numbered roughly the same as today: about 6,500–7,000. Known Holocene extinctions total around 240 species (mostly large-bodied or island endemics). Many of those losses happened after 5000 BC, so the mid-Holocene total was only modestly higher. Speciation is far too slow for meaningful gains in just 7,000 years.

@NatureofHistory @LaurenWitzkeDE @Sammythewammy2 @grok how big would the boat need to be. Is the size talked about in the Bible big enough for this many species?

The Bible describes the ark as 300 cubits long, 50 wide and 30 high (Genesis 6:15). Using a common 18-inch cubit yields roughly 450 × 75 × 45 ft and about 1.5 million cubic feet of volume—enough for well over 100,000 sheep-sized animals. Around 6,500–7,000 mammal species as pairs means roughly 13,000–14,000 individuals. Adding birds, reptiles and amphibians raises the total further. Multiple volume studies conclude the biblical dimensions can accommodate tens of thousands of average-sized animals plus food and supplies when space is packed efficiently, though the exact fit hinges on animal sizes, ages and layout.

NOBODY LISTEN TO THESE ATHEIST LIES ABOUT HOW THERE IS “ UNQUESTIONABLE” HISTORICAL “PROOF” THE ARK IS JUST A RETELLING OF OLDER STORIES.

To the media and “evolutionist.” (Neither of which believe in the God of the Bible.) Psalm 14 14 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

You just said no test results have come back, but you’re proclaiming it to be Noah’s Ark, and we’re the ones lying?

No tests have come back and yet you're trying to claim it IS Noah's Ark without physical proof while dismissing people who have proof it ISN'T Noah's Ark.

It is Noah’s Ark

Either your stupidity is epic, or you are a clickwhore Or both

Make sure the “Scientists” you are working with are clear of conflicts, have no agenda, and are trustworthy. Keep them confidential or they will be doxxed

Samples of what exactly? Where is this lab located? I know that's not the fabled Noah's Ark because there was never a world-wide global flood that allowed ANY ship or boat to get to that elevation, ~ 6,625 ft. Geologists have shown that there was never a world-wide flood 4-5-6 thousand years ago by examining the earth's strata, ice core samples and tree rings. Are you going to have the so called "non-fossilized seashell" Carbon-14, radiocarbon dated?

Daily reminder that the Noah’s Ark myth is just a plagiarised Mesopotamian legend.

Their demons that run them are riled up! Keep up your good work

Wouldn't the ark be eroded by now if it existed dipshit.

Amazing work keep all of us posted

You hypocrite! You've been calling it Noah's ark this whole time

Just dig it up and stop grifting if true

Luke 16:31 Then Abraham said, "If they will not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone should rise from the dead."

Read the Epic of Gilgamesh, and you'll find that Noah's Ark was debunked 4k years ago, before it was even invented. 🤣

Why are you calling it Noah’s ark when 1500 years prior it was mentioned in Mesopotamia? Must Abrahamics steal everything on earth??

Lauren I see in the one video short it looks like they are taking core samples of what is believed to be the massive ribs of the ship. Fascinating those possible ship ribs are so evenly spaced. I also seen an interview with Rick Reiner speaking on the research being done right now.. In the interview Rick said a naval ship wreck investigator was there at the ark site. The gentleman told Rick he had investigated ancient wrecks all around the world. He said what he sees at the Ark site was in his experience, the remains of a very large ship. I found this along some of the other experts research is very promising. People need to remember the samples still have to be sent to I believe I heard you say three different labs? I have to say some of these people attacking your work, they sound really scared it will be proven to be Noah's ark. Just another reason I hope it is! GOD bless!🙏

that can be Noah's Ark and evolution can be tru at the same time. There is a growing archeological view that the flood was real, given that there's tons of other religious that have flood myths of similar magnitude. Starting with the Mesopotanians. Maybe be less dogmatic about claiming this somehow debugs evolution? lol Finding an ancient boat won't be enough to debunk evolution.

I’m debunking it because that’s not the shape the Bible describes and it truly doesn’t describe anchors being attached to it

Noah's Ark is an obvious myth. It is obvious to thinking people. But the sickest part about this is all the Christians who cheer that they now have evidence that their God was angry and drowned millions of children, infants, and pregnant women. Appalling morality.

is this an accurate & fair description of the 1996 Fasold study of the Durupinar site in Turkey, the capabilities of the BakhtarRadar used in 2026 and the results of the BakhtarRadar scans done in 2026? Did the 2026 scans definitively prove that the boat-shaped anomaly is not geological (and therefore is man-made)? Provide a comprehensive, factual answer free of bias in either direction.

These Urartian tells are scattered throughout the former Iron Age kingdom.

The same depraved pedophiles that think a man can be a woman are talking trash? Who cares. Just keep documenting and ignore them.

Little hypocritical, don’t you think? You haven’t received analytical data from core samples yet you’ve been claiming you found Noah’s ark in the same breath… I guess whatever fits your narrative.

How do you reconcile the fact that different versions of the Noah story appear in the historical record with different names, circumstances, and boat shapes?

they started the cleanup in the press before a single core left Turkey. that is not science. that is damage control for a boat they already mapped

The Grand Canyon did not take millions of years to create. It is a result of the great flood. Evolutionists are a sick, dying breed.

I agree, we mustn’t jump the gun and ‘decide’ whether it is or it isn’t. That’s not good science. We must allow the tests to be run independently, and follow the conclusions they provide. However, given the claim that this could be Noah’s Ark, it’s unsurprising that there are very different and very loud opinions on this.

2 Corinthians 4:4 "the god of this world" (or age) has blinded the minds of unbelievers to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God." (Notice the first g is lowercase)

samples ? are they gonna be tattoed with noah name? sad creatures like u always try to find a reason to satisfy their existence not ur god nor erthin else not to prove some creation but feed ego to feel lil important but u r too stpd with the bs

Becuase it’s obviously a doubly plunging syncline. Just like I dont need to sample the air to know it’s the sky. There is zero ambiguity here. They are not incredibly common, and obvious.
