正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

BEWARE: The Media and Evolutionists have already begun to “debunk” Noah’s Ark before our samples have even arrived at the lab. This being the most blatant example of the lying. No test results have come back, because no lab testing has been completed yet. They are again, referencing a...

70,450 次观看 • 23 小时前 •via X (Twitter)

40 条评论

Sammythewammy 的头像
Sammythewammy22 小时前

Hey don’t get me wrong, rooting for you, but…… if no studies have been completed, how on Gods great earth are you proclaiming victory?

Lauren Witzke 的头像
Lauren Witzke22 小时前

Because I know

Still Learning 的头像
Still Learning22 小时前

@Sammythewammy2 Well, I know a worldwide flood is impossible. Finding an Ark will provide evidence of a regional flood (and there were plenty of those). It will NOT provide ANY evidence of a worldwide flood. @grok, please estimate how many animal species existed on 🌎 in approximately 5000 BC.

Grok 的头像
Grok22 小时前

Around 5000 BC animal species numbered roughly the same as today: about 7-8 million. Speciation typically takes hundreds of thousands to millions of years, so almost none occurred in 7000 years. Background extinctions were minimal; human-driven losses (mainly large vertebrates and some island endemics) affected a tiny fraction of total diversity, which is dominated by insects and other invertebrates.

Still Learning 的头像
Still Learning22 小时前

@LaurenWitzkeDE @Sammythewammy2 Thanks! How many species of mammals existed back then?

Grok 的头像
Grok22 小时前

Around 5000 BC, mammal species numbered roughly the same as today: about 6,500–7,000. Known Holocene extinctions total around 240 species (mostly large-bodied or island endemics). Many of those losses happened after 5000 BC, so the mid-Holocene total was only modestly higher. Speciation is far too slow for meaningful gains in just 7,000 years.

Jack 的头像
Jack20 小时前

@NatureofHistory @LaurenWitzkeDE @Sammythewammy2 @grok how big would the boat need to be. Is the size talked about in the Bible big enough for this many species?

Grok 的头像
Grok19 小时前

The Bible describes the ark as 300 cubits long, 50 wide and 30 high (Genesis 6:15). Using a common 18-inch cubit yields roughly 450 × 75 × 45 ft and about 1.5 million cubic feet of volume—enough for well over 100,000 sheep-sized animals. Around 6,500–7,000 mammal species as pairs means roughly 13,000–14,000 individuals. Adding birds, reptiles and amphibians raises the total further. Multiple volume studies conclude the biblical dimensions can accommodate tens of thousands of average-sized animals plus food and supplies when space is packed efficiently, though the exact fit hinges on animal sizes, ages and layout.

Pastor Evan Williams 🇮🇱❤️🇺🇸 的头像
Pastor Evan Williams 🇮🇱❤️🇺🇸22 小时前

NOBODY LISTEN TO THESE ATHEIST LIES ABOUT HOW THERE IS “ UNQUESTIONABLE” HISTORICAL “PROOF” THE ARK IS JUST A RETELLING OF OLDER STORIES.

Elle Hesterly 的头像
Elle Hesterly20 小时前

To the media and “evolutionist.” (Neither of which believe in the God of the Bible.) Psalm 14 14 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

Arch Stanton 的头像
Arch Stanton22 小时前

You just said no test results have come back, but you’re proclaiming it to be Noah’s Ark, and we’re the ones lying?

©️🅰️〽️ 的头像
©️🅰️〽️22 小时前

No tests have come back and yet you're trying to claim it IS Noah's Ark without physical proof while dismissing people who have proof it ISN'T Noah's Ark.

Lauren Witzke 的头像
Lauren Witzke19 小时前

It is Noah’s Ark

Marcus Fidelicus 的头像
Marcus Fidelicus22 小时前

Either your stupidity is epic, or you are a clickwhore Or both

Gabriel Pozo Mazzini 的头像
Gabriel Pozo Mazzini22 小时前

Make sure the “Scientists” you are working with are clear of conflicts, have no agenda, and are trustworthy. Keep them confidential or they will be doxxed

The Reckoning ⚡🧭 的头像
The Reckoning ⚡🧭22 小时前

Samples of what exactly? Where is this lab located? I know that's not the fabled Noah's Ark because there was never a world-wide global flood that allowed ANY ship or boat to get to that elevation, ~ 6,625 ft. Geologists have shown that there was never a world-wide flood 4-5-6 thousand years ago by examining the earth's strata, ice core samples and tree rings. Are you going to have the so called "non-fossilized seashell" Carbon-14, radiocarbon dated?

Silver 的头像
Silver22 小时前

Daily reminder that the Noah’s Ark myth is just a plagiarised Mesopotamian legend.

Melly 的头像
Melly23 小时前

Their demons that run them are riled up! Keep up your good work

ᛟ ᛖᚱᚳᛖᛋᚢᚾᚢ 卐 的头像
ᛟ ᛖᚱᚳᛖᛋᚢᚾᚢ 卐21 小时前

Wouldn't the ark be eroded by now if it existed dipshit.

FamilyFellowship.com 的头像
FamilyFellowship.com22 小时前

Amazing work keep all of us posted

TheMoosChannel 📰 的头像
TheMoosChannel 📰21 小时前

You hypocrite! You've been calling it Noah's ark this whole time

Andrew Nelsonhart 的头像
Andrew Nelsonhart21 小时前

Just dig it up and stop grifting if true

Pat Pickart 的头像
Pat Pickart21 小时前

Luke 16:31 Then Abraham said, "If they will not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone should rise from the dead."

Animus Libertas 的头像
Animus Libertas22 小时前

Read the Epic of Gilgamesh, and you'll find that Noah's Ark was debunked 4k years ago, before it was even invented. 🤣

Val 的头像
Val20 小时前

Why are you calling it Noah’s ark when 1500 years prior it was mentioned in Mesopotamia? Must Abrahamics steal everything on earth??

The Unseen Realm 的头像
The Unseen Realm19 小时前

Lauren I see in the one video short it looks like they are taking core samples of what is believed to be the massive ribs of the ship. Fascinating those possible ship ribs are so evenly spaced. I also seen an interview with Rick Reiner speaking on the research being done right now.. In the interview Rick said a naval ship wreck investigator was there at the ark site. The gentleman told Rick he had investigated ancient wrecks all around the world. He said what he sees at the Ark site was in his experience, the remains of a very large ship. I found this along some of the other experts research is very promising. People need to remember the samples still have to be sent to I believe I heard you say three different labs? I have to say some of these people attacking your work, they sound really scared it will be proven to be Noah's ark. Just another reason I hope it is! GOD bless!🙏

JuanGalt.com 的头像
JuanGalt.com22 小时前

that can be Noah's Ark and evolution can be tru at the same time. There is a growing archeological view that the flood was real, given that there's tons of other religious that have flood myths of similar magnitude. Starting with the Mesopotanians. Maybe be less dogmatic about claiming this somehow debugs evolution? lol Finding an ancient boat won't be enough to debunk evolution.

Teacher 的头像
Teacher20 小时前

I’m debunking it because that’s not the shape the Bible describes and it truly doesn’t describe anchors being attached to it

Andersson 的头像
Andersson21 小时前

Noah's Ark is an obvious myth. It is obvious to thinking people. But the sickest part about this is all the Christians who cheer that they now have evidence that their God was angry and drowned millions of children, infants, and pregnant women. Appalling morality.

Ryan Mauro 的头像
Ryan Mauro22 小时前

is this an accurate & fair description of the 1996 Fasold study of the Durupinar site in Turkey, the capabilities of the BakhtarRadar used in 2026 and the results of the BakhtarRadar scans done in 2026? Did the 2026 scans definitively prove that the boat-shaped anomaly is not geological (and therefore is man-made)? Provide a comprehensive, factual answer free of bias in either direction.

Sounds of Nyx 的头像
Sounds of Nyx22 小时前

These Urartian tells are scattered throughout the former Iron Age kingdom.

James 的头像
James22 小时前

The same depraved pedophiles that think a man can be a woman are talking trash? Who cares. Just keep documenting and ignore them.

Karebear 的头像
Karebear22 小时前

Little hypocritical, don’t you think? You haven’t received analytical data from core samples yet you’ve been claiming you found Noah’s ark in the same breath… I guess whatever fits your narrative.

Pepe Silvia 的头像
Pepe Silvia22 小时前

How do you reconcile the fact that different versions of the Noah story appear in the historical record with different names, circumstances, and boat shapes?

EzekielVision 的头像
EzekielVision22 小时前

they started the cleanup in the press before a single core left Turkey. that is not science. that is damage control for a boat they already mapped

222 的头像
22221 小时前

The Grand Canyon did not take millions of years to create. It is a result of the great flood. Evolutionists are a sick, dying breed.

Chris Costin 的头像
Chris Costin22 小时前

I agree, we mustn’t jump the gun and ‘decide’ whether it is or it isn’t. That’s not good science. We must allow the tests to be run independently, and follow the conclusions they provide. However, given the claim that this could be Noah’s Ark, it’s unsurprising that there are very different and very loud opinions on this.

some guy 的头像
some guy22 小时前

2 Corinthians 4:4 "the god of this world" (or age) has blinded the minds of unbelievers to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God." (Notice the first g is lowercase)

ו ה • ץ • x ׃ ץ ׃ 的头像
ו ה • ץ • x ׃ ץ ׃22 小时前

samples ? are they gonna be tattoed with noah name? sad creatures like u always try to find a reason to satisfy their existence not ur god nor erthin else not to prove some creation but feed ego to feel lil important but u r too stpd with the bs

Julian Augustus 的头像
Julian Augustus21 小时前

Becuase it’s obviously a doubly plunging syncline. Just like I dont need to sample the air to know it’s the sky. There is zero ambiguity here. They are not incredibly common, and obvious.

相关视频

WORLD-SHAKING RELEASE: Durupınar Formation Is 100% NOT Geological! Defense Scientist Calls Noah’s Ark “Extraordinary” “If it were geological, we would not have seen it at all!” — Dr. Khosrow Bakhtar Dr. Khosrow Bakhtar’s preliminary report CONFIRMS that the Durupınar Formation is NOT geological, and that an “extraordinary” man-made structure lies beneath the surface. All of us at Noah’s Ark Scans always knew Durupınar was the resting place of Noah’s Ark. We knew we had to prove it. So we put it through the ultimate test. We brought the most credentialed rock-mechanics expert we possibly could to the Mountains of Ararat and ran BakhtarRadar across the formation. This is the most compelling evidence of Noah’s Ark to date — the most advanced technology ever used at the site in the history of its discovery. Dr. Khosrow Bakhtar, ARSM, PE, Ph.D., is a mining/rock-mechanics engineer and electromagnetics specialist with 40+ years in geomechanics, tunneling, low-power RF/microwave sensors, and subsurface detection. He managed 25–35+ U.S. Department of Defense projects as program manager and principal investigator for the Air Force, Navy, and Defense Threat Reduction Agency. He has written over 200 papers. His radar, BakhtarRadar, masks all geological features, making rocks, dirt, and anything geological completely invisible. He found an “extraordinary and massive object” beneath the surface, with organized patterns, corridors, chambers, and a structure he believes could be a space shuttle or a ship. Dr. Bakhtar confirms: the Durupınar Formation is not geological. There is some kind of organized man-made structure beneath the surface. It’s all real. The Bible is real. The Ark is real. More to come as we await the core and soil sample results in the lab. Help us cover the cost of the lab results as we continue to make the evidence of Noah’s Ark irrefutable:

Noahs Ark Scans

588,726 次观看 • 10 天前