Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Biased Bev’s explanation for ruling Dr. Laposata’s unqualified to testify about dog bites or portions of her opinions on injuries from a vehicle pedestrian collision makes no sense. 1) Dr. Laposata has been qualified by a federal judge as an expert on dog bites, but I’m sure Bev knows... better! 🤣 2) She’s worked on approximately 50 cases with dog bite injuries 3) She uses the same methodology as Dr. Marie Russell, who corrupt Cannone already qualified as a dog bite expert 4) Judge Bev’s own reasoning here would unequivocally exclude the Commonwealth’s non-medical doctor dog behaviorist, Dr. Crosby, from providing expert testimony on medical causation of the injuries on John’s arm #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenReadshow more

Olivia

28,147 subscribers

112,606 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Linda Kenney Baden (she/her)

Linda Kenney Baden (she/her)vor 1 Jahr

This ruling is dead set wrong. The forensic pathologist is the only person who sees the dead body with injuries. If Cannone were going to do a DAUBERT should have been before trial so to other forensic paths could testify or submit certifications saying her "methodology" based on experience etc is valid! @JusticeServedTV

Profilbild von UserInterface

UserInterfacevor 5 Jahren

Did You Know Dog Insurance Was a Thing? #pets #dogs #petcare

Profilbild von Michelle #AmericaFirst

Michelle #AmericaFirstvor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw So a "dog behaviorist" has more qualification to opine on dog bites than a forensic pathologist who's been an ME in several different states for nearly 5 decades?? Got it.🤦‍♀️

Profilbild von Bill -_-

Bill -_-vor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw Cannone has gone way past being biased into the corrupt zone. No justice is possible in her court.

Profilbild von 𝙴𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚑 #𝕁𝕦𝕡𝕚𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕀𝕍𝔾𝕒𝕟𝕘

𝙴𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚑 #𝕁𝕦𝕡𝕚𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕀𝕍𝔾𝕒𝕟𝕘vor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw Reversible error

Profilbild von SallyCinnamon

SallyCinnamonvor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw I don't think it's going to matter much what Biased Bev thinks or rules about this qualified expert's dog bite testimony. Defense is brilliant! Wait for it!

Profilbild von michelle L

michelle Lvor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw For Hank, the less the jury hears about dog bites (from either side), the better.

Profilbild von Frank Parker, Jr. ESQ, DDH, PDQ, BLT.

Frank Parker, Jr. ESQ, DDH, PDQ, BLT.vor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw Jackson must be laughing internally going over her credentials on direct. Auntie Bev REALLY screwed the pooch on this one. Pun intended.

Profilbild von The Cuban Sandwich Crisis

The Cuban Sandwich Crisisvor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw I love that Alan is usin the rest of the day to run through all of the credentials and ticky-tack details. It may seem like a waste of time, but it will all make sense once Hank starts objecting to every question here very soon.

Profilbild von *~The~Truth~Is~Always~The~Strongest~Argument~*

*~The~Truth~Is~Always~The~Strongest~Argument~*vor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw i mean it kinda does make sense if ya think about it… 🫤

Profilbild von Smathers

Smathersvor 1 Jahr

@aburkhartlaw "the crime scene"

Ähnliche Videos

During trial 1, Bev allowed Dr. Frank Sheridan - A FORENSIC PATHOLOGIST, the same profession as Dr. Laposata, to testify about JOKs injuries being….. DOG. BITES. Bev Cannone HAS to see the writing on the wall for the CW. She’s been awful throughout, but denying Laposata is such an awful ruling, even by her standards.

During trial 1, Bev allowed Dr. Frank Sheridan - A FORENSIC PATHOLOGIST, the same profession as Dr. Laposata, to testify about JOKs injuries being….. DOG. BITES. Bev Cannone HAS to see the writing on the wall for the CW. She’s been awful throughout, but denying Laposata is such an awful ruling, even by her standards.

Theecret Agent Flip

38,612 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Dr. Marie Russell makes a fantastic point about how on John O’Keefe’s right arm sweatshirt sleeve, the fibers at the puncture holes are coming outward, signifying that the entry object that caused the holes in the sleeve & the corresponding wounds on John’s arm, also exited or pulled out of the sleeve. This observation is highly characteristic of wounds caused by dog bites through a sleeve. However, this would not occur as the result of taillight, or any object for that matter, shattering onto John O’Keefe’s arm—as in that case, the shattered taillight pieces wouldn’t pull out or “exit” from the fabric like dog teeth would. This was the Commonwealth’s theory for the causation of injury, or the wounds on John O’Keefe’s right arm. Thoroughly debunked by Dr. Marie Russell. See evidence exhibits attached displaying the punctate holes with their fibers pulling outward from John O’Keefe’s sweatshirt sleeves. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup

Dr. Marie Russell makes a fantastic point about how on John O’Keefe’s right arm sweatshirt sleeve, the fibers at the puncture holes are coming outward, signifying that the entry object that caused the holes in the sleeve & the corresponding wounds on John’s arm, also exited or pulled out of the sleeve. This observation is highly characteristic of wounds caused by dog bites through a sleeve. However, this would not occur as the result of taillight, or any object for that matter, shattering onto John O’Keefe’s arm—as in that case, the shattered taillight pieces wouldn’t pull out or “exit” from the fabric like dog teeth would. This was the Commonwealth’s theory for the causation of injury, or the wounds on John O’Keefe’s right arm. Thoroughly debunked by Dr. Marie Russell. See evidence exhibits attached displaying the punctate holes with their fibers pulling outward from John O’Keefe’s sweatshirt sleeves. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup

Olivia

39,210 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Remember when Hank Brennan tried to have a “gotcha!” moment with Dr. Marie Russell, acting as if he knows more than her about dog bites, when he claimed that they’re “routinely referred to as an hourglass shape”? Brennan went so far as to represent that “hourglass” is the industry standard term used to describe the shape of dog bites by experts in an attempt to imply that being unfamiliar with this term suggests one isn’t an expert. ———— Brennan asked: “Well in most professional studies by experts, isn’t it routinely referred to as an hourglass shape?” Dr. Russell replied: “I haven’t seen that at all.” Brennan asked: “Well have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “I’ve read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “No. I have read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you ever read this book (Brennan holds up book)? Do you recognize this as an authority?” Dr. Russell replied: “No.” ———— There’s just one problem for Mr. Brennan. This—the term “hourglass” for describing the shape of dog bites—isn’t a standard known or used industry term, in fact, it isn’t even a term used by experts in the field, nor is it a term used in “professional studies” to describe the shape of dog bites. Unable to find any instances where the term “hourglass” is used in any of the literature, “professional studies”, scientific papers or expert testimony, I decided to consult Hank Brennan’s Dog Bible (I mean book) since he specifically cited to it as being a source that substantiates the supposed established & routine use of this terminology by experts in the field. However, in my quest to determine if this was in fact the case, I scanned through the entirety of Brennan’s “Dog Bites: A Multidisciplinary Perspective” book in order to find what he was referring to. Shockingly, for a term like “hourglass” that Brennan portrayed as being industry nomenclature, or specific verbiage used by experts & in books—particularly Brennan’s book—to describe & expertly qualify the distinct shape of dog bites, this book used the word “hourglass” one time across its 450+ pages. In its singular mention of the word “hourglass”, the book states: “The hourglass shape of a generalized dog bite is clearly different from the typical bow shape of a human bite” (pg. 237). Nowhere in this sentence, page or chapter of the book does it indicate that the word “hourglass” is a widely accepted & used term in the field for describing the shape of dog bites. Based on its singular reference & lack of routine use in this entire book about dog bites, I think it’s safe to say that Hank Brennan is not only wrong, but apparently didn’t read his own reference book—other than perhaps the one page mentioning “hourglass”. ———— Final note on Brennan’s apparent lack of discernment on what constitutes an authoritative source in the field, especially in the areas of science & medicine, and particularly as it relates to expert witness testimony: It’d also appear that Brennan is confusing “professional studies” with peer reviewed studies. This seems to be further reinforced by the fact that he leaned on “books” as a default authority source, when in actuality, it is very well understood both in the medical/scientific community, as well as in the legal world of expert witnesses, that the unequivocally reliable authoritative source is the peer-reviewed study—sometimes referred to as “articles” (aka academic research articles). You probably recall hearing Dr. Russell refer to many such “articles” (peer reviewed studies) throughout the hearing. Peer-reviewed studies, unlike “professional studies”, are academic research articles that undergo rigorous scrutiny by experts in the field (peers) before publication. This process ensures the quality, validity & originality of the research—unlike say a book, for instance, which has no barrier to publication. #KarenReadTrial

Remember when Hank Brennan tried to have a “gotcha!” moment with Dr. Marie Russell, acting as if he knows more than her about dog bites, when he claimed that they’re “routinely referred to as an hourglass shape”? Brennan went so far as to represent that “hourglass” is the industry standard term used to describe the shape of dog bites by experts in an attempt to imply that being unfamiliar with this term suggests one isn’t an expert. ———— Brennan asked: “Well in most professional studies by experts, isn’t it routinely referred to as an hourglass shape?” Dr. Russell replied: “I haven’t seen that at all.” Brennan asked: “Well have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “I’ve read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “No. I have read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you ever read this book (Brennan holds up book)? Do you recognize this as an authority?” Dr. Russell replied: “No.” ———— There’s just one problem for Mr. Brennan. This—the term “hourglass” for describing the shape of dog bites—isn’t a standard known or used industry term, in fact, it isn’t even a term used by experts in the field, nor is it a term used in “professional studies” to describe the shape of dog bites. Unable to find any instances where the term “hourglass” is used in any of the literature, “professional studies”, scientific papers or expert testimony, I decided to consult Hank Brennan’s Dog Bible (I mean book) since he specifically cited to it as being a source that substantiates the supposed established & routine use of this terminology by experts in the field. However, in my quest to determine if this was in fact the case, I scanned through the entirety of Brennan’s “Dog Bites: A Multidisciplinary Perspective” book in order to find what he was referring to. Shockingly, for a term like “hourglass” that Brennan portrayed as being industry nomenclature, or specific verbiage used by experts & in books—particularly Brennan’s book—to describe & expertly qualify the distinct shape of dog bites, this book used the word “hourglass” one time across its 450+ pages. In its singular mention of the word “hourglass”, the book states: “The hourglass shape of a generalized dog bite is clearly different from the typical bow shape of a human bite” (pg. 237). Nowhere in this sentence, page or chapter of the book does it indicate that the word “hourglass” is a widely accepted & used term in the field for describing the shape of dog bites. Based on its singular reference & lack of routine use in this entire book about dog bites, I think it’s safe to say that Hank Brennan is not only wrong, but apparently didn’t read his own reference book—other than perhaps the one page mentioning “hourglass”. ———— Final note on Brennan’s apparent lack of discernment on what constitutes an authoritative source in the field, especially in the areas of science & medicine, and particularly as it relates to expert witness testimony: It’d also appear that Brennan is confusing “professional studies” with peer reviewed studies. This seems to be further reinforced by the fact that he leaned on “books” as a default authority source, when in actuality, it is very well understood both in the medical/scientific community, as well as in the legal world of expert witnesses, that the unequivocally reliable authoritative source is the peer-reviewed study—sometimes referred to as “articles” (aka academic research articles). You probably recall hearing Dr. Russell refer to many such “articles” (peer reviewed studies) throughout the hearing. Peer-reviewed studies, unlike “professional studies”, are academic research articles that undergo rigorous scrutiny by experts in the field (peers) before publication. This process ensures the quality, validity & originality of the research—unlike say a book, for instance, which has no barrier to publication. #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

31,675 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

$KAREN READ TRIAL REVIEW #3: Injuries don’t add up. Besides the wounds on his right arm, from the neck down, John O’Keefe had: - No significant injuries from the neck down - No injuries to his shoulders - No injuries to his chest area (aside from CPR related injuries) - No injuries to his torso - No injuries to his back - No injuries to his hips - No injuries to his pelvis - No injuries to his thighs - No injuries to his knees - No injuries to his shins - No injuries to his ankles - No injuries to his feet The Commonwealth alleges that Officer John O’Keefe was the victim of a pedestrian-vehicle collision. Yet, he did not have a single broken bone from the neck down. Not a single fracture other than from CPR administration. From the state’s Medical Examiner, Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello’s testimony, trial 1. #CantonCoverup #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe$

KAREN READ TRIAL REVIEW #3: Injuries don’t add up. Besides the wounds on his right arm, from the neck down, John O’Keefe had: - No significant injuries from the neck down - No injuries to his shoulders - No injuries to his chest area (aside from CPR related injuries) - No injuries to his torso - No injuries to his back - No injuries to his hips - No injuries to his pelvis - No injuries to his thighs - No injuries to his knees - No injuries to his shins - No injuries to his ankles - No injuries to his feet The Commonwealth alleges that Officer John O’Keefe was the victim of a pedestrian-vehicle collision. Yet, he did not have a single broken bone from the neck down. Not a single fracture other than from CPR administration. From the state’s Medical Examiner, Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello’s testimony, trial 1. #CantonCoverup #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

31,718 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#WATCH | Kalyan, Maharashtra: A stray dog allegedly injuring around 125–130 people in seven hours across the stretch from Sandeep Hotel to Khadakpada. Dr. Mohammad Anees, Rukminibai Hospital, says, "A total of 48 dog bite cases were reported to us on August 9th... The remaining cases likely went to private facilities. As for the localities these patients are from, most are from Chikanghar, Godrej Hill, Adharwadi, and Reti Bandar in Kalyan West. Some are in serious condition; specifically, young children with deep bite injuries have been referred to Sion Hospital for treatment by a pediatric surgeon."

#WATCH | Kalyan, Maharashtra: A stray dog allegedly injuring around 125–130 people in seven hours across the stretch from Sandeep Hotel to Khadakpada. Dr. Mohammad Anees, Rukminibai Hospital, says, "A total of 48 dog bite cases were reported to us on August 9th... The remaining cases likely went to private facilities. As for the localities these patients are from, most are from Chikanghar, Godrej Hill, Adharwadi, and Reti Bandar in Kalyan West. Some are in serious condition; specifically, young children with deep bite injuries have been referred to Sion Hospital for treatment by a pediatric surgeon."

ANI

119,684 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Dave Aronberg debating Brother Counsel is a reminder that prosecutors who refuse to question law enforcement negligence and speak with such arrogance about facts they don’t fully understand are how innocent people end up in prison. Mistruth #1: “No Dog DNA” Truth: The results were inconclusive. On January 29, 2022, John O’Keefe’s clothing was collected from the hospital floor by Proctor. Instead of turning the items over to CSSS, he took them to the temporary evidence room and laid them out on butcher paper to dry, in an open area all troopers had access to. No chain of custody log exists. The clothing was not delivered to the MSP Crime Lab until March 14, six weeks later. It then sat for 14 months before being tested by MSP analyst Hartnett. Dog DNA testing resulted in no dog DNA, but it was also noted degradation and the presence of an inhibitor are possible reasons. Pig DNA was identified. Adam Lally also failed to preserve tissue samples from John O’Keefe’s right arm, injuries that appear consistent with dog bites to most observers. Chloe, the McAlbert dog was “rehomed” and renamed Cora soon after Karen Read’s defense team wanted information regarding the dog, given John O’Keefe’s arm injuries appear as from a dog attack. 📺

Dave Aronberg debating Brother Counsel is a reminder that prosecutors who refuse to question law enforcement negligence and speak with such arrogance about facts they don’t fully understand are how innocent people end up in prison. Mistruth #1: “No Dog DNA” Truth: The results were inconclusive. On January 29, 2022, John O’Keefe’s clothing was collected from the hospital floor by Proctor. Instead of turning the items over to CSSS, he took them to the temporary evidence room and laid them out on butcher paper to dry, in an open area all troopers had access to. No chain of custody log exists. The clothing was not delivered to the MSP Crime Lab until March 14, six weeks later. It then sat for 14 months before being tested by MSP analyst Hartnett. Dog DNA testing resulted in no dog DNA, but it was also noted degradation and the presence of an inhibitor are possible reasons. Pig DNA was identified. Adam Lally also failed to preserve tissue samples from John O’Keefe’s right arm, injuries that appear consistent with dog bites to most observers. Chloe, the McAlbert dog was “rehomed” and renamed Cora soon after Karen Read’s defense team wanted information regarding the dog, given John O’Keefe’s arm injuries appear as from a dog attack. 📺

Lara

12,228 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

VIDEO | Bengaluru: Satyaprakash Dubey, husband of the woman techie who was attacked by a pet dog, said, "On January 26, around 6–6:50 a.m., my wife was returning from her morning walk when our neighbour’s dog suddenly ran towards her, she fell down, and the dog brutally attacked her. She suffered severe injuries to her neck, the right side of her face, and her scalp. If the pet owner could not control such a large dog, it should never have been allowed to roam freely. Pet owners are responsible for following safety norms, including using a leash and muzzle, especially in public areas. My wife is in deep trauma and has suffered severe mental shock. As per doctors, the scars on her face and body will remain for life." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Bengaluru: Satyaprakash Dubey, husband of the woman techie who was attacked by a pet dog, said, "On January 26, around 6–6:50 a.m., my wife was returning from her morning walk when our neighbour’s dog suddenly ran towards her, she fell down, and the dog brutally attacked her. She suffered severe injuries to her neck, the right side of her face, and her scalp. If the pet owner could not control such a large dog, it should never have been allowed to roam freely. Pet owners are responsible for following safety norms, including using a leash and muzzle, especially in public areas. My wife is in deep trauma and has suffered severe mental shock. As per doctors, the scars on her face and body will remain for life." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

108,565 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

$"they know that if these gruesome images were made public, the industry would collapse. These injuries are not rare accidents, they are inherent to the very design of greyhound racing" Former GRNSW chief vet Dr Alex Brittan at yesterday's Tasmania greyhound racing transition committee hearing: 'These are not normal domestic pet injuries. These are not sprained ankles from playing fetch in the park. These are high impact devastating kinetic traumas, second only to hit by car injuries in severity. These are the most extreme injuries experienced by dogs." "As chief veterinary officer I didn't hide in an administrative office, I regularly attended race meetings & worked directly beside the on-track veterinarians. I was witness to the worst injuries that I have ever seen in 30 years as a vet." "A dog sliced in half by a broken cable of a mechanical lure. Twisted lung lobes, twisted bowels, torn kidneys, shattered skulls from colliding with steel posts, and fractured legs that dogs continue to run on crossing the line with flapping broken bones." "There was a dog with bilateral fractures that suffered such catastrophic blood loss that even a seasoned track manager of 10 years vomited on the track." "The videos of these injuries are tightly siloed and hidden by the industry. They are strictly barred from public viewing because they are so completely damning." Watch in full here: #bangreyhoundracing$

"they know that if these gruesome images were made public, the industry would collapse. These injuries are not rare accidents, they are inherent to the very design of greyhound racing" Former GRNSW chief vet Dr Alex Brittan at yesterday's Tasmania greyhound racing transition committee hearing: 'These are not normal domestic pet injuries. These are not sprained ankles from playing fetch in the park. These are high impact devastating kinetic traumas, second only to hit by car injuries in severity. These are the most extreme injuries experienced by dogs." "As chief veterinary officer I didn't hide in an administrative office, I regularly attended race meetings & worked directly beside the on-track veterinarians. I was witness to the worst injuries that I have ever seen in 30 years as a vet." "A dog sliced in half by a broken cable of a mechanical lure. Twisted lung lobes, twisted bowels, torn kidneys, shattered skulls from colliding with steel posts, and fractured legs that dogs continue to run on crossing the line with flapping broken bones." "There was a dog with bilateral fractures that suffered such catastrophic blood loss that even a seasoned track manager of 10 years vomited on the track." "The videos of these injuries are tightly siloed and hidden by the industry. They are strictly barred from public viewing because they are so completely damning." Watch in full here: #bangreyhoundracing

Susan Metcalfe

10,747 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

NEW: Dr. Mimi Syed (Dr. Mimi Syed), a U.S. emergency physician who has been outspoken about Israel’s destruction of Gaza’s health system, was denied entry today as she tried to begin her third medical mission. She and her team — carrying baby formula for malnourished children and medical equipment to treat a surge of Guillain-Barré Syndrome cases — were turned back without explanation after flying to Amman, Jordan in hopes of reaching Gaza. Syed has twice worked inside Gaza in the past 22 months and has testified at the Gaza Tribunal in Sarajevo, met directly with UN Secretary General António Guterres, and briefed Senate offices in Washington on the catastrophic humanitarian crisis unfolding in the medical sector. Her denial comes as Israel continues to block medical workers and supplies from reaching a health system it has already devastated. A video Dr Syed shared with Drop Site shows her suitcase packed with baby formula for Gaza’s starving infants.

NEW: Dr. Mimi Syed (Dr. Mimi Syed), a U.S. emergency physician who has been outspoken about Israel’s destruction of Gaza’s health system, was denied entry today as she tried to begin her third medical mission. She and her team — carrying baby formula for malnourished children and medical equipment to treat a surge of Guillain-Barré Syndrome cases — were turned back without explanation after flying to Amman, Jordan in hopes of reaching Gaza. Syed has twice worked inside Gaza in the past 22 months and has testified at the Gaza Tribunal in Sarajevo, met directly with UN Secretary General António Guterres, and briefed Senate offices in Washington on the catastrophic humanitarian crisis unfolding in the medical sector. Her denial comes as Israel continues to block medical workers and supplies from reaching a health system it has already devastated. A video Dr Syed shared with Drop Site shows her suitcase packed with baby formula for Gaza’s starving infants.

Drop Site

50,555 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Woman Suffers Severe Injuries in Dog Attack at HSR Layout; Owner Booked in Bengaluru A morning walk turned tragic for a resident of Teachers Colony in HSR Layout, Bengaluru, when she was mauled by a Pet Dog, leaving her with severe injuries. The incident occurred around 6:00 am on January 26 at 13th Cross Road. According to the FIR filed at the HSR Layout Police Station, the victim, Shalini Dubey, was attacked by a dog belonging to local resident Amaresh Reddy. The complainant, her husband, stated that the attack was so forceful it knocked his wife to the ground. The dog bit her on the face, hands, and legs, resulting in significant blood loss. The family prioritised medical treatment for Shalini, which led to a two-day delay in approaching the police. The FIR was formally registered on the evening of January 28. The case has been registered under BNS Sections 117(3), 125 and 291 against Amaresh Reddy. The complainant alleges that although Reddy was holding the dog at the time of the incident, he failed to control the animal, describing his actions as “negligent conduct.” The victim is currently admitted to a private hospital and is receiving treatment.

Woman Suffers Severe Injuries in Dog Attack at HSR Layout; Owner Booked in Bengaluru A morning walk turned tragic for a resident of Teachers Colony in HSR Layout, Bengaluru, when she was mauled by a Pet Dog, leaving her with severe injuries. The incident occurred around 6:00 am on January 26 at 13th Cross Road. According to the FIR filed at the HSR Layout Police Station, the victim, Shalini Dubey, was attacked by a dog belonging to local resident Amaresh Reddy. The complainant, her husband, stated that the attack was so forceful it knocked his wife to the ground. The dog bit her on the face, hands, and legs, resulting in significant blood loss. The family prioritised medical treatment for Shalini, which led to a two-day delay in approaching the police. The FIR was formally registered on the evening of January 28. The case has been registered under BNS Sections 117(3), 125 and 291 against Amaresh Reddy. The complainant alleges that although Reddy was holding the dog at the time of the incident, he failed to control the animal, describing his actions as “negligent conduct.” The victim is currently admitted to a private hospital and is receiving treatment.

KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱

10,412 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Do you ride a bike? Or an e-scooter? Or walk a dog? If so, please take a second to read this. If you are on a bike or scooter on a shared pathway and approaching someone walking a dog, please be courteous and slow down a little. Especially if coming up from behind. I am a wheelchair user with a dog and we have way too many close calls with fast moving bikes and scooters. People not using a bell and whipping by within inches. If the dog turned it's head or stepped a bit wide, they'd be hit. I'll happily move as far to one side of the path as possible, and if I've got the younger dog who isn't as experienced around fast moving things, I'll stop at the very side and have him sit in front of me to give everyone as much space as possible. If I don't know you're approaching, I can't do that. So please, for the love of dog, use your bell. Don't wait until you're right behind someone with a dog. Use it while you're still at a distance, and if you aren't sure they noticed it, ring it a few more times. Give them as much time as possible to move to the side and prepare the dog. If it's a puppy or a dog that hasn't had much experience with bikes, being able to get them off the path or give them a little extra distance from the fast moving bike helps prevent them from getting scared. The vast majority of cyclists are great and really respectful, but there's always a few that aren't. This year the challenge is kids on e-scooters. They are going fast and having fun. Safety isn't at the forefront of their mind. They often don't use a bell or slow down at blind corners, and many don't think about giving the dog any space. I've been startled a few times by them so I can only imagine how the dog felt. This is one of the reasons why I do a lot of desensitization and counter conditioning. Dog owners-you need to do your part to. If you've got headphones on, make sure you can still hear the bike bell. Make sure to give the cyclist or scooter rider as much space as possible from your dog. And of course, unless you are on a designated off leash trail, keep your dog on a leash. If you have a puppy or a newly adopted dog that might not be comfortable around bikes, take some kibble or treats and go hang out with them near a multi use path. Let them watch. As the bike or scooter approaches, drop a few treats on the ground. For many dogs, this is all it takes, but if your dog is visibly stressed, fixated on the bike, or reacting, try moving a further from the trail and once they're comfortable at a slightly further distance, try closer again. If they are still stressed or fearful even with more distance, don't force the issue. Instead introduce them to a bike that isn't moving, and gradually work them up from there. If they are struggling, talk to a trainer. Regardless of if you are holding a leash, riding a bike or scooter, or enjoying a walk outdoors, just be respectful. And of course, be safe. Thanks, Admin 🎥 Puppy walk for cuteness

Do you ride a bike? Or an e-scooter? Or walk a dog? If so, please take a second to read this. If you are on a bike or scooter on a shared pathway and approaching someone walking a dog, please be courteous and slow down a little. Especially if coming up from behind. I am a wheelchair user with a dog and we have way too many close calls with fast moving bikes and scooters. People not using a bell and whipping by within inches. If the dog turned it's head or stepped a bit wide, they'd be hit. I'll happily move as far to one side of the path as possible, and if I've got the younger dog who isn't as experienced around fast moving things, I'll stop at the very side and have him sit in front of me to give everyone as much space as possible. If I don't know you're approaching, I can't do that. So please, for the love of dog, use your bell. Don't wait until you're right behind someone with a dog. Use it while you're still at a distance, and if you aren't sure they noticed it, ring it a few more times. Give them as much time as possible to move to the side and prepare the dog. If it's a puppy or a dog that hasn't had much experience with bikes, being able to get them off the path or give them a little extra distance from the fast moving bike helps prevent them from getting scared. The vast majority of cyclists are great and really respectful, but there's always a few that aren't. This year the challenge is kids on e-scooters. They are going fast and having fun. Safety isn't at the forefront of their mind. They often don't use a bell or slow down at blind corners, and many don't think about giving the dog any space. I've been startled a few times by them so I can only imagine how the dog felt. This is one of the reasons why I do a lot of desensitization and counter conditioning. Dog owners-you need to do your part to. If you've got headphones on, make sure you can still hear the bike bell. Make sure to give the cyclist or scooter rider as much space as possible from your dog. And of course, unless you are on a designated off leash trail, keep your dog on a leash. If you have a puppy or a newly adopted dog that might not be comfortable around bikes, take some kibble or treats and go hang out with them near a multi use path. Let them watch. As the bike or scooter approaches, drop a few treats on the ground. For many dogs, this is all it takes, but if your dog is visibly stressed, fixated on the bike, or reacting, try moving a further from the trail and once they're comfortable at a slightly further distance, try closer again. If they are still stressed or fearful even with more distance, don't force the issue. Instead introduce them to a bike that isn't moving, and gradually work them up from there. If they are struggling, talk to a trainer. Regardless of if you are holding a leash, riding a bike or scooter, or enjoying a walk outdoors, just be respectful. And of course, be safe. Thanks, Admin 🎥 Puppy walk for cuteness

Team Servicerottie🇨🇦🐕‍🦺🦽

15,632 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat