Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

BIG | 🇩🇪🇷🇺‼️‼️ Germany considered formally escalating the Leipzig drone attack to NATO consultations under Article 4, but ultimately held back to avoid giving Moscow an immediate path to a broader confrontation. According to DIE ZEIT, Berlin discussed invoking NATO Article 4, which allows allies to consult when a...

78,289 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

‼️🇩🇪🇺🇦🇷🇺 As NATO prepares for its high-stakes summit, Berlin is signaling an unprecedented financial pivot that could cement Germany as Ukraine's most dominant military benefactor in Europe. Germany is planning to deliver the largest single package of NATO-backed support to Ukraine, potentially totaling a staggering €70 billion, according to remarks made by German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius in an interview with Bild. While Pistorius refrained from explicitly confirming the exact multi-year baseline figures during the interview, the immense scope of the new aid framework aims to dramatically accelerate Kyiv's defense capabilities. He emphasized that European Union member states must aggressively sustain their financial and military pipelines to the Ukrainian government in order to decisively help it achieve success in the ongoing conflict against Russia. This massive projected aid framework marks a profound geopolitical transition, establishing Germany as the primary anchor of European security and shifting the center of gravity for Ukraine's long-term defense funding away from Washington. By floating a potential €70 billion commitment just ahead of the NATO summit, Berlin is aiming to set a commanding benchmark for other European allies, signaling that even as the financial toll rises, Europe is prepared to bear the economic burden of containing Russian expansion permanently.

Visioner

85,793 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.

Igor Kyivskyi

226,429 просмотров • 2 лет назад