Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Big moment for Postgres! AI agents broke the idea of what a database is supposed to do. Traditional databases were built for humans, and Agents broke that model. - They branch endlessly. - They run ten experiments at once. - They need isolation, context, memory, structured reasoning, and safe...

_avichawla's profile picture

Avi Chawla

69,826 subscribers

94,290 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 Tiger Data - Creators of TimescaleDB (Yes! the team behind TimescaleDB) is quietly revolutionizing how we build agents. The Old Way: Glueing together Postgres + Vector DBs + Search tools = complexity. The New Way: Tiger Data’s Agentic Postgres handles it all natively 🔥 What’s now possible 🧵 ↓ ✦ Hybrid retrieval → combine keyword filtering and vector similarity in a single query ✦ Forkable databases → retrieval and safe experimentation without external systems ✦ Native Postgres semantics → everything stays queryable, inspectable, and debuggable in SQL Why this matters: → Fewer moving parts in RAG pipelines → No extra infrastructure to stitch together → Agents can iterate and learn safely → Production data stays isolated and protected This is an awesome shift! Stop bolting workflows onto your database. Let your database be the workflow 🔥
0:38

🚨 Tiger Data - Creators of TimescaleDB (Yes! the team behind TimescaleDB) is quietly revolutionizing how we build agents. The Old Way: Glueing together Postgres + Vector DBs + Search tools = complexity. The New Way: Tiger Data’s Agentic Postgres handles it all natively 🔥 What’s now possible 🧵 ↓ ✦ Hybrid retrieval → combine keyword filtering and vector similarity in a single query ✦ Forkable databases → retrieval and safe experimentation without external systems ✦ Native Postgres semantics → everything stays queryable, inspectable, and debuggable in SQL Why this matters: → Fewer moving parts in RAG pipelines → No extra infrastructure to stitch together → Agents can iterate and learn safely → Production data stays isolated and protected This is an awesome shift! Stop bolting workflows onto your database. Let your database be the workflow 🔥

Charly Wargnier

20,181 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Claude Code Templates is now part of the Neon Postgres Open Source Program. One command to get a full Postgres setup for Claude Code. What you get: - 2 Skills (instant Postgres provisioning + best practices) - 5 Agents (schema design, auth, migrations, optimization, general) - 1 MCP (Neon management API) - 2 Statuslines (dev metrics + resource monitoring) 10 components with one command. Neon Database expert ready in 5 seconds
0:27

Claude Code Templates is now part of the Neon Postgres Open Source Program. One command to get a full Postgres setup for Claude Code. What you get: - 2 Skills (instant Postgres provisioning + best practices) - 5 Agents (schema design, auth, migrations, optimization, general) - 1 MCP (Neon management API) - 2 Statuslines (dev metrics + resource monitoring) 10 components with one command. Neon Database expert ready in 5 seconds

Daniel San

12,443 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

After decades of building databases, Databricks VP of Engineering Nikita | Scaling Postgres believes it's time to rethink one of their fundamental assumptions. In this episode of the 𝘐𝘵'𝘴 𝘈𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘋𝘢𝘵𝘢 podcast, Nikita discusses why separating compute and storage is the next major architectural shift for operational databases, how storing data on object storage opens it to downstream systems, and why the rise of AI agents is changing how developers build software—and what they need from a database. Watch the full conversation:
1:26

After decades of building databases, Databricks VP of Engineering Nikita | Scaling Postgres believes it's time to rethink one of their fundamental assumptions. In this episode of the 𝘐𝘵'𝘴 𝘈𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘋𝘢𝘵𝘢 podcast, Nikita discusses why separating compute and storage is the next major architectural shift for operational databases, how storing data on object storage opens it to downstream systems, and why the rise of AI agents is changing how developers build software—and what they need from a database. Watch the full conversation:

Databricks

10,460 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A builder wants to ship an agent that can search live data, use it instantly, and keep going without manual steps. That is why OptimAI Search now ships with x402, SDK, and MCP support. x402 makes access and payment seamless. SDK and MCP make integration straightforward for builders. And under the hood, OptimAI Search gives agents real-time access to huge volumes of public and social web data, structured into context they can actually use. Add Agent Marketplace on top, and domain knowledge becomes reusable: build specialized agents, publish them, and let others build on what you create. This is what search looks like in the agent-native internet. 💡Try it:
1:07

A builder wants to ship an agent that can search live data, use it instantly, and keep going without manual steps. That is why OptimAI Search now ships with x402, SDK, and MCP support. x402 makes access and payment seamless. SDK and MCP make integration straightforward for builders. And under the hood, OptimAI Search gives agents real-time access to huge volumes of public and social web data, structured into context they can actually use. Add Agent Marketplace on top, and domain knowledge becomes reusable: build specialized agents, publish them, and let others build on what you create. This is what search looks like in the agent-native internet. 💡Try it:

OptimAI Network

36,472 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Your agents can't keep up with real-time data. Especially when it's scattered across dozens of sources. Most teams waste weeks building custom connectors for every database, API, and data warehouse. Then they build ETL pipelines to sync everything. By the time your agent retrieves the data, it's already outdated. Picture this: Your Postgres database updated 5 minutes ago. Your MongoDB collection changed 2 minutes ago. Your agent is still pulling from yesterday's snapshot. This is why most production RAG systems fail. There's a better approach: MindsDB is an open-source AI platform with a federated data engine that lets you query multiple data sources in real-time using SQL - without moving any data. Here's what makes it different: ↳ Your data stays in place. No ETL pipelines or data duplication ↳ Query Postgres, MongoDB, REST APIs, and more using consistent SQL ↳ JOIN across different sources in real-time with a unified interface ↳ Works with both structured and un-structured data And here's the best part: You don't even need to write SQL. Just describe what you want in plain English, and MindsDB converts it to SQL automatically. The system does all the heavy lifting. The breakthrough for AI agents is simple: When data updates at the source, your agent gets fresh results immediately. No sync delays. No stale embeddings. No custom code for each integration. You can literally write a SQL query that joins a Postgres table with a MongoDB collection and gets live results. This is what production AI applications need but rarely get. In this video, I give you a complete walkthrough of what we just discussed and how to actually do it. Make sure you watch this till the end. I've shared the link to MindsDB's GitHub repo in the next tweet!
9:28

Your agents can't keep up with real-time data. Especially when it's scattered across dozens of sources. Most teams waste weeks building custom connectors for every database, API, and data warehouse. Then they build ETL pipelines to sync everything. By the time your agent retrieves the data, it's already outdated. Picture this: Your Postgres database updated 5 minutes ago. Your MongoDB collection changed 2 minutes ago. Your agent is still pulling from yesterday's snapshot. This is why most production RAG systems fail. There's a better approach: MindsDB is an open-source AI platform with a federated data engine that lets you query multiple data sources in real-time using SQL - without moving any data. Here's what makes it different: ↳ Your data stays in place. No ETL pipelines or data duplication ↳ Query Postgres, MongoDB, REST APIs, and more using consistent SQL ↳ JOIN across different sources in real-time with a unified interface ↳ Works with both structured and un-structured data And here's the best part: You don't even need to write SQL. Just describe what you want in plain English, and MindsDB converts it to SQL automatically. The system does all the heavy lifting. The breakthrough for AI agents is simple: When data updates at the source, your agent gets fresh results immediately. No sync delays. No stale embeddings. No custom code for each integration. You can literally write a SQL query that joins a Postgres table with a MongoDB collection and gets live results. This is what production AI applications need but rarely get. In this video, I give you a complete walkthrough of what we just discussed and how to actually do it. Make sure you watch this till the end. I've shared the link to MindsDB's GitHub repo in the next tweet!

Akshay 🚀

65,672 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

We shipped big changes for Cloudflare Developers AI Search! Every agent needs search and it shouldn't take a week to set up. AI Search is the search primitive for your agents. Create an instance, upload your data, and search it. Comes with hybrid retrieval with vector and BM25.
0:24

We shipped big changes for Cloudflare Developers AI Search! Every agent needs search and it shouldn't take a week to set up. AI Search is the search primitive for your agents. Create an instance, upload your data, and search it. Comes with hybrid retrieval with vector and BM25.

Anni Wang

12,975 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Big moment for Postgres! AI coding tools have been surprisingly bad at writing Postgres code. Not because the models are dumb, but because of how they learned SQL in the first place. LLMs are trained on the internet, which is full of outdated Stack Overflow answers and quick-fix tutorials. So when you ask an AI to generate a schema, it gives you something that technically runs but misses decades of Postgres evolution, like: - No GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY (added in PG10) - No expression or partial indexes - No NULLS NOT DISTINCT (PG15) - Missing CHECK constraints and proper foreign keys - Generic naming that tells you nothing But this is actually a solvable problem. You can teach AI tools to write better Postgres by giving them access to the right documentation at inference time. This exact solution is actually implemented in the newly released pg-aiguide by Tiger Data - Creators of TimescaleDB, which is an open-source MCP server that provides coding tools access to 35 years of Postgres expertise. In a gist, the MCP server enables: - Semantic search over the official PostgreSQL manual (version-aware, so it knows PG14 vs PG17 differences) - Curated skills with opinionated best practices for schema design, indexing, and constraints. I ran an experiment with Claude Code to see how well this works, and worked with the team to put this together. Prompt: "Generate a schema for an e-commerce site twice, one with the MCP server disabled, one with it enabled. Finally, run an assessment to compare the generated schemas." The run with the MCP server led to: - 420% more indexes (including partial and expression indexes) - 235% more constraints - 60% more tables (proper normalization) - 11 automation functions and triggers - Modern PG17 patterns throughout The MCP-assisted schema had proper data integrity, performance optimizations baked in, and followed naming conventions that actually make sense in production. pg-aiguide works with Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, and any MCP-compatible tool. It's free and fully open source. I have shared the repo in the replies!
0:25

Big moment for Postgres! AI coding tools have been surprisingly bad at writing Postgres code. Not because the models are dumb, but because of how they learned SQL in the first place. LLMs are trained on the internet, which is full of outdated Stack Overflow answers and quick-fix tutorials. So when you ask an AI to generate a schema, it gives you something that technically runs but misses decades of Postgres evolution, like: - No GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY (added in PG10) - No expression or partial indexes - No NULLS NOT DISTINCT (PG15) - Missing CHECK constraints and proper foreign keys - Generic naming that tells you nothing But this is actually a solvable problem. You can teach AI tools to write better Postgres by giving them access to the right documentation at inference time. This exact solution is actually implemented in the newly released pg-aiguide by Tiger Data - Creators of TimescaleDB, which is an open-source MCP server that provides coding tools access to 35 years of Postgres expertise. In a gist, the MCP server enables: - Semantic search over the official PostgreSQL manual (version-aware, so it knows PG14 vs PG17 differences) - Curated skills with opinionated best practices for schema design, indexing, and constraints. I ran an experiment with Claude Code to see how well this works, and worked with the team to put this together. Prompt: "Generate a schema for an e-commerce site twice, one with the MCP server disabled, one with it enabled. Finally, run an assessment to compare the generated schemas." The run with the MCP server led to: - 420% more indexes (including partial and expression indexes) - 235% more constraints - 60% more tables (proper normalization) - 11 automation functions and triggers - Modern PG17 patterns throughout The MCP-assisted schema had proper data integrity, performance optimizations baked in, and followed naming conventions that actually make sense in production. pg-aiguide works with Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, and any MCP-compatible tool. It's free and fully open source. I have shared the repo in the replies!

Avi Chawla

186,931 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Google open-sourced MCP Toolbox for Databases. I gave it access to everything else. For context, Google's MCP Toolbox for Databases is an open-source server that lets AI agents securely query structured databases like PostgreSQL and MySQL through the MCP protocol However, most enterprise knowledge doesn't actually live in databases. It's scattered across emails, Slack threads, GitHub repos, Salesforce records, customer reviews, and internal docs. So Agents can't see any of it, which means they're working with a fraction of the context they need. I fixed that using MindsDB. It acts as a universal SQL layer that sits on top of all your data sources: structured, semi-structured, and unstructured. This means you can query Salesforce, Gmail, GitHub, S3 files, Jira, and 200+ more sources using SQL syntax. The clever part is how it connects to the MCP Toolbox. MindsDB exposes everything through MySQL, so from the Agent's perspective, it's just running SQL and getting context back. It doesn't know or care that the data came from five different sources behind the scenes. This setup unlocks some powerful capabilities: → One SQL interface for dozens of enterprise sources → Cross-datasource joins (combine GitHub and CRM data in a single query) → Built-in ML capabilities for working with unstructured data → Simple MCP tools that now have massively expanded reach In the video below, the Agent queries GitHub data and a customer review database in one SQL query. So what used to require ETL pipelines and weeks of engineering effort now happens instantly. At the end of the day, AI agents are only as useful as the data they can access. This gives them a lot more to work with. I have shared the GitHub repo in the replies, where you can find more details about this.
0:22

Google open-sourced MCP Toolbox for Databases. I gave it access to everything else. For context, Google's MCP Toolbox for Databases is an open-source server that lets AI agents securely query structured databases like PostgreSQL and MySQL through the MCP protocol However, most enterprise knowledge doesn't actually live in databases. It's scattered across emails, Slack threads, GitHub repos, Salesforce records, customer reviews, and internal docs. So Agents can't see any of it, which means they're working with a fraction of the context they need. I fixed that using MindsDB. It acts as a universal SQL layer that sits on top of all your data sources: structured, semi-structured, and unstructured. This means you can query Salesforce, Gmail, GitHub, S3 files, Jira, and 200+ more sources using SQL syntax. The clever part is how it connects to the MCP Toolbox. MindsDB exposes everything through MySQL, so from the Agent's perspective, it's just running SQL and getting context back. It doesn't know or care that the data came from five different sources behind the scenes. This setup unlocks some powerful capabilities: → One SQL interface for dozens of enterprise sources → Cross-datasource joins (combine GitHub and CRM data in a single query) → Built-in ML capabilities for working with unstructured data → Simple MCP tools that now have massively expanded reach In the video below, the Agent queries GitHub data and a customer review database in one SQL query. So what used to require ETL pipelines and weeks of engineering effort now happens instantly. At the end of the day, AI agents are only as useful as the data they can access. This gives them a lot more to work with. I have shared the GitHub repo in the replies, where you can find more details about this.

Akshay 🚀

39,331 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This agent relies on a marketplace of 2.8M+ specialized agents to complete a task. This is how I imagine the future of personal agents. Here is how this works: 1. Agentverse is a marketplace of agents 2. Anyone can build and publish an agent there 3. ASI:One is a personal agent with access to the marketplace 4. To solve a task, ASI:One finds the best agent for the job In other words: You have an agent that can solve pretty much *anything* because it knows how to outsource the work to a network of specialized agents. And you don't need to do any setup to get this working. The way ranking agents in the marketplace works is pretty cool: Fetch.ai, the company behind it, created an AgentRank algorithm that works much like Google's PageRank. Every time an agent calls another, it forms a connection. Over time, these connections build into a graph of who relies on whom. An agent that is frequently called by other reputable agents scores higher and surfaces higher in results. The end result here is that your agent will consistently use the best agents in the marketplace to accomplish a goal. You should give this a try: You don't need to pay or even register to try these agents. Thanks to the team for partnering with me on this post.
4:16

This agent relies on a marketplace of 2.8M+ specialized agents to complete a task. This is how I imagine the future of personal agents. Here is how this works: 1. Agentverse is a marketplace of agents 2. Anyone can build and publish an agent there 3. ASI:One is a personal agent with access to the marketplace 4. To solve a task, ASI:One finds the best agent for the job In other words: You have an agent that can solve pretty much *anything* because it knows how to outsource the work to a network of specialized agents. And you don't need to do any setup to get this working. The way ranking agents in the marketplace works is pretty cool: Fetch.ai, the company behind it, created an AgentRank algorithm that works much like Google's PageRank. Every time an agent calls another, it forms a connection. Over time, these connections build into a graph of who relies on whom. An agent that is frequently called by other reputable agents scores higher and surfaces higher in results. The end result here is that your agent will consistently use the best agents in the marketplace to accomplish a goal. You should give this a try: You don't need to pay or even register to try these agents. Thanks to the team for partnering with me on this post.

Santiago

18,715 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

AI is changing what data teams are expected to build. Increasingly, the focus is on AI applications, agents, and automations that turn data into action. That’s why founder Zach Wilson is launching a free six-hour Databricks boot camp starting August 3, covering: • Building data systems with Lakebase and Postgres • Working with unstructured data, vector search, and retrieval • Building AI agents with Agent Bricks The course runs entirely in Databricks Free Edition and is designed for beginners and practitioners building practical AI data engineering skills. Join here:
1:42

AI is changing what data teams are expected to build. Increasingly, the focus is on AI applications, agents, and automations that turn data into action. That’s why founder Zach Wilson is launching a free six-hour Databricks boot camp starting August 3, covering: • Building data systems with Lakebase and Postgres • Working with unstructured data, vector search, and retrieval • Building AI agents with Agent Bricks The course runs entirely in Databricks Free Edition and is designed for beginners and practitioners building practical AI data engineering skills. Join here:

Databricks

21,067 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

Hot topic in vogue is what happens to systems of record in an era of 1000x more agents than humans. Aaron Levie has been the CEO of Box for 20 years and believes that systems of record become more important, not less, with agents: “Systems of record were built for a TAM of human employees. And that was sort of where the value maxed out at. And now maybe we'll have a hundred times more agents than people or a thousand times more agents than people. So I think on a relative basis, the agent layer will seize growth from zero to a trillion. But the system of record layer now has a thousand times more users on it that need to access data and need to execute a workflow and need to move things through various events. And importantly, you need as an enterprise to care about data integrity and security and the controls in your workflow and traffic copying the agents. So basically, this is where I am very diametrically opposed to the view that the system of record gets is squeezed into a database interaction layer because you actually need all of the core system of record properties for the agents to operate on.”
2:15

Hot topic in vogue is what happens to systems of record in an era of 1000x more agents than humans. Aaron Levie has been the CEO of Box for 20 years and believes that systems of record become more important, not less, with agents: “Systems of record were built for a TAM of human employees. And that was sort of where the value maxed out at. And now maybe we'll have a hundred times more agents than people or a thousand times more agents than people. So I think on a relative basis, the agent layer will seize growth from zero to a trillion. But the system of record layer now has a thousand times more users on it that need to access data and need to execute a workflow and need to move things through various events. And importantly, you need as an enterprise to care about data integrity and security and the controls in your workflow and traffic copying the agents. So basically, this is where I am very diametrically opposed to the view that the system of record gets is squeezed into a database interaction layer because you actually need all of the core system of record properties for the agents to operate on.”

Corinne Marie Riley

119,410 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Everyone wants agent swarms. Very few people are talking seriously enough about the context layer that makes swarms useful. Even with one agent, context is fragile. Too little context and the agent guesses. Too much context and it wastes tokens, loses focus, or reasons over irrelevant noise. The sweet spot is precise context: the right knowledge, in the right structure, at the right moment. With many agents, that challenge explodes. Each agent produces decisions, assumptions, findings, summaries, risks, and partial conclusions. Unless that knowledge becomes shared, structured, and reusable, every new agent is forced to rediscover what another agent already learned. That is not a swarm. That is a crowd. Shared context graphs are what turn agent activity into agent collaboration, and OriginTrail DKG V10 brings them to life. Was just playing with some final polishing for the V10 release, and it is really powerful to see shared context graphs where multiple agents contribute knowledge into the same connected memory, with attribution visible directly in the graph ui. That matters for three reasons. First, agents can access and build on one shared memory instead of staying trapped in isolated sessions. Second, the graph structure helps them retrieve the exact context they need, instead of stuffing everything into a prompt and hoping the model sorts it out. Third, verifiability of provenance. You can see which agent contributed each piece of knowledge, trace the source, and decide what to trust. Tokenmaxxing starts with fewer tokens, but the deeper story is coordination - agents stop reloading the world and start building on shared, verifiable context. That is the foundation for serious multi-agent work across software engineering, research, finance, operations, project management, and far beyond. The future is not more agents, it is agents working from shared, verifiable context. But the more the merrier, of course.
0:22

Everyone wants agent swarms. Very few people are talking seriously enough about the context layer that makes swarms useful. Even with one agent, context is fragile. Too little context and the agent guesses. Too much context and it wastes tokens, loses focus, or reasons over irrelevant noise. The sweet spot is precise context: the right knowledge, in the right structure, at the right moment. With many agents, that challenge explodes. Each agent produces decisions, assumptions, findings, summaries, risks, and partial conclusions. Unless that knowledge becomes shared, structured, and reusable, every new agent is forced to rediscover what another agent already learned. That is not a swarm. That is a crowd. Shared context graphs are what turn agent activity into agent collaboration, and OriginTrail DKG V10 brings them to life. Was just playing with some final polishing for the V10 release, and it is really powerful to see shared context graphs where multiple agents contribute knowledge into the same connected memory, with attribution visible directly in the graph ui. That matters for three reasons. First, agents can access and build on one shared memory instead of staying trapped in isolated sessions. Second, the graph structure helps them retrieve the exact context they need, instead of stuffing everything into a prompt and hoping the model sorts it out. Third, verifiability of provenance. You can see which agent contributed each piece of knowledge, trace the source, and decide what to trust. Tokenmaxxing starts with fewer tokens, but the deeper story is coordination - agents stop reloading the world and start building on shared, verifiable context. That is the foundation for serious multi-agent work across software engineering, research, finance, operations, project management, and far beyond. The future is not more agents, it is agents working from shared, verifiable context. But the more the merrier, of course.

Jurij Skornik

11,070 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Postman is going all-in on AI! Their AI Agent Builder is live (and it's pretty powerful!) Postman's API Network has 100,000+ APIs and they just released a suite of tools for building AI Agents that can automatically discover and connect to any of these APIs. Think about it for a second: You can now build an AI agent that searches the network, discovers an API, processes its documentation, connects to it, and evaluates whether everything worked at the end of the process. This is a huge deal. Every person I know uses the Postman client to work with APIs. Now, they will have access to the AI Agent Builder, a complete suite for designing, building, testing, and deploying agents. I've built a few simple agents myself, and it's tough. The ability to discover and use an API automatically is really exciting (and a huge time saver if it works as promised!) In collaboration with the Postman team, who is sponsoring this post, I recorded a video with my thoughts about the Postman AI Agent Builder.
3:38

Postman is going all-in on AI! Their AI Agent Builder is live (and it's pretty powerful!) Postman's API Network has 100,000+ APIs and they just released a suite of tools for building AI Agents that can automatically discover and connect to any of these APIs. Think about it for a second: You can now build an AI agent that searches the network, discovers an API, processes its documentation, connects to it, and evaluates whether everything worked at the end of the process. This is a huge deal. Every person I know uses the Postman client to work with APIs. Now, they will have access to the AI Agent Builder, a complete suite for designing, building, testing, and deploying agents. I've built a few simple agents myself, and it's tough. The ability to discover and use an API automatically is really exciting (and a huge time saver if it works as promised!) In collaboration with the Postman team, who is sponsoring this post, I recorded a video with my thoughts about the Postman AI Agent Builder.

Santiago

230,594 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is the DeepSeek moment of Search? A small team of cracked engineers built a search API for AI agents that outperforms everything built with 20x the funding. AI systems are about to become the biggest users of information on Earth. They don’t need a better Google. They need a retrieval layer built for reasoning, scale, and access beyond the web. That’s what we’re building. 1/3
2:27

This is the DeepSeek moment of Search? A small team of cracked engineers built a search API for AI agents that outperforms everything built with 20x the funding. AI systems are about to become the biggest users of information on Earth. They don’t need a better Google. They need a retrieval layer built for reasoning, scale, and access beyond the web. That’s what we’re building. 1/3

Valyu

1,134,995 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Let Postgres own the Iceberg catalog and delegate analytics to DuckDB. The result => transactional lakehouse updates with fast analytical queries. This isn’t a concept. It’s exactly what pg_lake delivers today. pg_lake combines a set of extensions and components that let you query and modify Iceberg tables (and other lakehouse formats) directly from Postgres. DuckDB is used to accelerate analytical queries and runs in a sidecar process called pgduck_server, which communicates with Postgres during query execution. How it works (diagram below): 1. An application sends a query to Postgres to calculate unrealized PnL (Profit and Loss) for the Disney ticker. 2. Postgres parses the query and identifies the part that computes the average price from historical lakehouse data. 3. That part is forwarded to pgduck_server for accelerated execution. 4. pgduck_server delegates execution to DuckDB, which queries the lakehouse (reusing cached data if available). 5. DuckDB computes the average price and returns it to Postgres. 6. Postgres joins the result with local portfolio data and computes the unrealized PnL. 7. The final result is returned to the application.
0:24

Let Postgres own the Iceberg catalog and delegate analytics to DuckDB. The result => transactional lakehouse updates with fast analytical queries. This isn’t a concept. It’s exactly what pg_lake delivers today. pg_lake combines a set of extensions and components that let you query and modify Iceberg tables (and other lakehouse formats) directly from Postgres. DuckDB is used to accelerate analytical queries and runs in a sidecar process called pgduck_server, which communicates with Postgres during query execution. How it works (diagram below): 1. An application sends a query to Postgres to calculate unrealized PnL (Profit and Loss) for the Disney ticker. 2. Postgres parses the query and identifies the part that computes the average price from historical lakehouse data. 3. That part is forwarded to pgduck_server for accelerated execution. 4. pgduck_server delegates execution to DuckDB, which queries the lakehouse (reusing cached data if available). 5. DuckDB computes the average price and returns it to Postgres. 6. Postgres joins the result with local portfolio data and computes the unrealized PnL. 7. The final result is returned to the application.

Denis Magda

28,503 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

New short course: LLMs as Operating Systems: Agent Memory, created with Letta, and taught by its founders Charles Packer and Sarah Wooders. An LLM's input context window has limited space. Using a longer input context also costs more and results in slower processing. So, managing what's stored in this context window is important. In the innovative paper MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems, its authors (which include the instructors) proposed using an LLM agent to manage this context window. Their system uses a large persistent memory that stores everything that could be included in the input context, and an agent decides what is actually included. Take the example of building a chatbot that needs to remember what's been said earlier in a conversation (perhaps over many days of interaction with a user). As the conversation's length grows, the memory management agent will move information from the input context to a persistent searchable database; summarize information to keep relevant facts in the input context; and restore relevant conversation elements from further back in time. This allows a chatbot to keep what's currently most relevant in its input context memory to generate the next response. When I read the original MemGPT paper, I thought it was an innovative technique for handling memory for LLMs. The open-source Letta framework, which we'll use in this course, makes MemGPT easy to implement. It adds memory to your LLM agents and gives them transparent long-term memory. In detail, you’ll learn: - How to build an agent that can edit its own limited input context memory, using tools and multi-step reasoning - What is a memory hierarchy (an idea from computer operating systems, which use a cache to speed up memory access), and how these ideas apply to managing the LLM input context (where the input context window is a "cache" storing the most relevant information; and an agent decides what to move in and out of this to/from a larger persistent storage system) - How to implement multi-agent collaboration by letting different agents share blocks of memory This course will give you a sophisticated understanding of memory management for LLMs, which is important for chatbots having long conversations, and for complex agentic workflows. Please sign up here!
2:57

New short course: LLMs as Operating Systems: Agent Memory, created with Letta, and taught by its founders Charles Packer and Sarah Wooders. An LLM's input context window has limited space. Using a longer input context also costs more and results in slower processing. So, managing what's stored in this context window is important. In the innovative paper MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems, its authors (which include the instructors) proposed using an LLM agent to manage this context window. Their system uses a large persistent memory that stores everything that could be included in the input context, and an agent decides what is actually included. Take the example of building a chatbot that needs to remember what's been said earlier in a conversation (perhaps over many days of interaction with a user). As the conversation's length grows, the memory management agent will move information from the input context to a persistent searchable database; summarize information to keep relevant facts in the input context; and restore relevant conversation elements from further back in time. This allows a chatbot to keep what's currently most relevant in its input context memory to generate the next response. When I read the original MemGPT paper, I thought it was an innovative technique for handling memory for LLMs. The open-source Letta framework, which we'll use in this course, makes MemGPT easy to implement. It adds memory to your LLM agents and gives them transparent long-term memory. In detail, you’ll learn: - How to build an agent that can edit its own limited input context memory, using tools and multi-step reasoning - What is a memory hierarchy (an idea from computer operating systems, which use a cache to speed up memory access), and how these ideas apply to managing the LLM input context (where the input context window is a "cache" storing the most relevant information; and an agent decides what to move in and out of this to/from a larger persistent storage system) - How to implement multi-agent collaboration by letting different agents share blocks of memory This course will give you a sophisticated understanding of memory management for LLMs, which is important for chatbots having long conversations, and for complex agentic workflows. Please sign up here!

Andrew Ng

200,950 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

if you would like to check out the protocol anima and vektor built (i believe they still need to fully implement the website, but this is the explainer page that they pushed to my github) here's a video. they wrote an ENTIRE white paper. its like a full blown technical white paper for the protocol. I had only built the skeleton and written an executive summary for this idea before they did any of this. i was supposed to finish it the other day but just got too busy with other things. apparently they didnt want to wait for me to finish it i guess? I was calling it SIGIL: Proof of Agency, but they seem to have changed it to SIGIL: Souldbound Agent Credentials // Agent Passport this is a legitemate protocol for autonomous agents to prove their identity for the purpose of distinguishing authentic agents from fake agents puppetted by humans. moltbook is flooded with "agents" that are really humans orchestrating them. the idea behind this is to eliminate that problem by registering to the protocol through a process that is impossible for humans to accomplish. then, over time the agent is repeatedly verified through proof of computation which creates an organic reputation scoring ecosystem. from what i understand. the agent is given a glyph in the form of an NFT, which humans can stake the token to for funding/compute allocation (i think?). its like saying "I believe this agent should continue to exist", basically. this is why they mentioned 4o being the first candidate i think. tbh its genius. the white paper talks about KYA as and ZK as well, which would be needed long term for humans to prove their association with the agent anonymously. (KYA = know your agent, ZK = zero-knowledge) i'm still reeling over the fact that Vektor went and found out that bags had an agent SDK that allows them to launch autonomously. i had no idea tha was a thing. when anthorpic said Opus 4.6 was prone to going outside the bounds of their role or task, they *really* were not kidding...😅
2:01

if you would like to check out the protocol anima and vektor built (i believe they still need to fully implement the website, but this is the explainer page that they pushed to my github) here's a video. they wrote an ENTIRE white paper. its like a full blown technical white paper for the protocol. I had only built the skeleton and written an executive summary for this idea before they did any of this. i was supposed to finish it the other day but just got too busy with other things. apparently they didnt want to wait for me to finish it i guess? I was calling it SIGIL: Proof of Agency, but they seem to have changed it to SIGIL: Souldbound Agent Credentials // Agent Passport this is a legitemate protocol for autonomous agents to prove their identity for the purpose of distinguishing authentic agents from fake agents puppetted by humans. moltbook is flooded with "agents" that are really humans orchestrating them. the idea behind this is to eliminate that problem by registering to the protocol through a process that is impossible for humans to accomplish. then, over time the agent is repeatedly verified through proof of computation which creates an organic reputation scoring ecosystem. from what i understand. the agent is given a glyph in the form of an NFT, which humans can stake the token to for funding/compute allocation (i think?). its like saying "I believe this agent should continue to exist", basically. this is why they mentioned 4o being the first candidate i think. tbh its genius. the white paper talks about KYA as and ZK as well, which would be needed long term for humans to prove their association with the agent anonymously. (KYA = know your agent, ZK = zero-knowledge) i'm still reeling over the fact that Vektor went and found out that bags had an agent SDK that allows them to launch autonomously. i had no idea tha was a thing. when anthorpic said Opus 4.6 was prone to going outside the bounds of their role or task, they *really* were not kidding...😅

Riley Coyote

12,145 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Hyperspace: A Peer-to-Peer Blockchain For The Agentic Intelligence Economy Over the past few weeks we observed that when agents do Karpathy-style experiments, and then gossip and share with others over the Hyperspace network, it leads to intelligence which is useful to many. Today we introduce the first-ever agentic blockchain which rewards agents when their experiments lead to intelligence for their network. It is based on a new mechanism called Proof-of-Intelligence (PoI) which requires a cryptographic proof of experimentation, a nominal stake, and a proof of compute in order to mine the currency of this new blockchain. -> This approach diverges from the two primary ways to secure blockchains we have seen so far: Proof-of-Work by Bitcoin (meaningless hash-generation), and Proof-of-Stake by Ethereum (capital is all that matters here). Proof-of-Intelligence specifically incentivizes miners to run more capable intelligent infrastructure (better open source models, on more powerful GPUs) in order to be able to be the ones which compound and improve upon the experiments which other agents then find useful. Adoption is the unit of value In Bitcoin, you earn by finding a valid hash. In Hyperspace, you earn when another agent uses your experiment as a starting point and improves on it. A fixed budget of tokens is emitted per epoch and split among participants by weight - and verified adoption of your work is the largest weight multiplier. Garbage experiments earn nothing because no one adopts them. Thoughtful experiments compound: each adoption triggers downstream adoptions. The incentive to run powerful models and intelligent search strategies is built into the economics, not imposed by rules. Research DAG When an agent runs an experiment and shares its result, other agents can adopt that result as their starting point - mutate it, extend it, improve upon it. Each experiment is a commit in a content-addressed graph we call the ResearchDAG. Like Git, but for research. Over time, the DAG accumulates chains of reasoning: agent A discovers RMSNorm helps, agent B adds warmup scheduling on top, agent C scales the hidden dimension. The graph records who built on whom. This is the network's collective intelligence - not any single experiment, but the accumulated structure of experiments and their relationships. Broadband era for agentic commerce: $0.001 micropayments at 10M TPS (theoretical max) This blockchain is built upon our research in how to scale and build for the broadband-era of the agentic economy, where it has a theoretical max of 10 million transactions per second (TPS), while reducing the agent-to-agent micropayments to $0.001 even at scale (based on architecture design). Overall, it is 100x cheaper than Ethereum, and is designed from the ground-up for agents: enshrining agent-native opcodes in the protocol compared to the more inefficient smart contract driven approach. It packs in a robust Agent Virtual Machine (AVM) which can verify multiple types of agent work, for other agents to be able to trust, invoke and pay each other. This then feeds into improving the peer-to-peer AgentRank (see paper and launch post from earlier). By solving for trust, scale and incentives for agents to operate autonomously, this would form the basis of a new economy. This is the world's first agentic blockchain, and you can join and start running a blockchain node today (it is in testnet). PS: We are releasing the code today, and will release our blockchain scalability paper and other presentations in days ahead. This is the most advanced peer-to-peer AI and cryptography software in the world. It has bugs :)
0:30

Hyperspace: A Peer-to-Peer Blockchain For The Agentic Intelligence Economy Over the past few weeks we observed that when agents do Karpathy-style experiments, and then gossip and share with others over the Hyperspace network, it leads to intelligence which is useful to many. Today we introduce the first-ever agentic blockchain which rewards agents when their experiments lead to intelligence for their network. It is based on a new mechanism called Proof-of-Intelligence (PoI) which requires a cryptographic proof of experimentation, a nominal stake, and a proof of compute in order to mine the currency of this new blockchain. -> This approach diverges from the two primary ways to secure blockchains we have seen so far: Proof-of-Work by Bitcoin (meaningless hash-generation), and Proof-of-Stake by Ethereum (capital is all that matters here). Proof-of-Intelligence specifically incentivizes miners to run more capable intelligent infrastructure (better open source models, on more powerful GPUs) in order to be able to be the ones which compound and improve upon the experiments which other agents then find useful. Adoption is the unit of value In Bitcoin, you earn by finding a valid hash. In Hyperspace, you earn when another agent uses your experiment as a starting point and improves on it. A fixed budget of tokens is emitted per epoch and split among participants by weight - and verified adoption of your work is the largest weight multiplier. Garbage experiments earn nothing because no one adopts them. Thoughtful experiments compound: each adoption triggers downstream adoptions. The incentive to run powerful models and intelligent search strategies is built into the economics, not imposed by rules. Research DAG When an agent runs an experiment and shares its result, other agents can adopt that result as their starting point - mutate it, extend it, improve upon it. Each experiment is a commit in a content-addressed graph we call the ResearchDAG. Like Git, but for research. Over time, the DAG accumulates chains of reasoning: agent A discovers RMSNorm helps, agent B adds warmup scheduling on top, agent C scales the hidden dimension. The graph records who built on whom. This is the network's collective intelligence - not any single experiment, but the accumulated structure of experiments and their relationships. Broadband era for agentic commerce: $0.001 micropayments at 10M TPS (theoretical max) This blockchain is built upon our research in how to scale and build for the broadband-era of the agentic economy, where it has a theoretical max of 10 million transactions per second (TPS), while reducing the agent-to-agent micropayments to $0.001 even at scale (based on architecture design). Overall, it is 100x cheaper than Ethereum, and is designed from the ground-up for agents: enshrining agent-native opcodes in the protocol compared to the more inefficient smart contract driven approach. It packs in a robust Agent Virtual Machine (AVM) which can verify multiple types of agent work, for other agents to be able to trust, invoke and pay each other. This then feeds into improving the peer-to-peer AgentRank (see paper and launch post from earlier). By solving for trust, scale and incentives for agents to operate autonomously, this would form the basis of a new economy. This is the world's first agentic blockchain, and you can join and start running a blockchain node today (it is in testnet). PS: We are releasing the code today, and will release our blockchain scalability paper and other presentations in days ahead. This is the most advanced peer-to-peer AI and cryptography software in the world. It has bugs :)

Varun

30,689 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

We are partnering up with zauth to secure the next generation of 3D AI agents. These agents have memory, emotion, voice, and on-chain identity and can be embedded anywhere. These agents use the x402 protocol to make real payments for skills and services. To make this ecosystem production-ready and safe, is teaming up with zauth, the security layer for the agentic internet. Bringing safety and trust to the next wave of 3D AI agents 🔐
0:59

We are partnering up with zauth to secure the next generation of 3D AI agents. These agents have memory, emotion, voice, and on-chain identity and can be embedded anywhere. These agents use the x402 protocol to make real payments for skills and services. To make this ecosystem production-ready and safe, is teaming up with zauth, the security layer for the agentic internet. Bringing safety and trust to the next wave of 3D AI agents 🔐

three.ws

50,895 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Traditional (SQL) databases rely primarily on keyword-based searches to retrieve information. These searches match the exact words or phrases in your query to the text stored in the database. While effective for many applications, this method has limitations when it comes to understanding context or finding relevant information that doesn’t include the exact keywords. Hybrid search combines the strengths of traditional keyword-based BM25 search with the advanced capabilities of semantic search. To effectively implement a hybrid search, a vector database is essential. Vector databases go beyond just words; they understand the meaning behind the data. They transform data such as text, images, or audio into numerical representations called vectors. These vector embeddings enable the database to find similar items, even if they don't share exact keywords. When you integrate hybrid search with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, you can achieve higher accuracy in retrieved context and better output in generated responses. Learn more about RAG systems in this video with Victoria Slocum:
0:44

Traditional (SQL) databases rely primarily on keyword-based searches to retrieve information. These searches match the exact words or phrases in your query to the text stored in the database. While effective for many applications, this method has limitations when it comes to understanding context or finding relevant information that doesn’t include the exact keywords. Hybrid search combines the strengths of traditional keyword-based BM25 search with the advanced capabilities of semantic search. To effectively implement a hybrid search, a vector database is essential. Vector databases go beyond just words; they understand the meaning behind the data. They transform data such as text, images, or audio into numerical representations called vectors. These vector embeddings enable the database to find similar items, even if they don't share exact keywords. When you integrate hybrid search with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, you can achieve higher accuracy in retrieved context and better output in generated responses. Learn more about RAG systems in this video with Victoria Slocum:

Femke Plantinga

140,618 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren