Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Big Pharma are determined to avoid liability for their products. Johnson & Johnson is creating subsidiary companies and then letting them go bankrupt to escape liability and lawsuits from people getting cancer from their products. Source: Secrets of Civilizations

ABridgen's profile picture

Andrew Bridgen

377,112 subscribers

13,543 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 URGENT: If agrochemical companies have their way, they will be immune from ALL liability. Much like vaccine manufacturers have liability protections, agrochemical companies are on the hunt to dodge lawsuits for the harm their chemical products cause. With issues like non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, endocrine disruption, birth defects and nervous system damage linked back to these companies, Bayer and others are “hemorrhaging money.” Desperate to stop further lawsuits, they’re seeking immunity from all liability. “If this passes federally, that means all across the country no agrochemical company will be able to be sued if somebody gets cancer or loses a child or has nervous system damage from their chemicals.” Zen Honeycutt Watch the whole episode on CHDTV ⬇️
1:49

🚨 URGENT: If agrochemical companies have their way, they will be immune from ALL liability. Much like vaccine manufacturers have liability protections, agrochemical companies are on the hunt to dodge lawsuits for the harm their chemical products cause. With issues like non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, endocrine disruption, birth defects and nervous system damage linked back to these companies, Bayer and others are “hemorrhaging money.” Desperate to stop further lawsuits, they’re seeking immunity from all liability. “If this passes federally, that means all across the country no agrochemical company will be able to be sued if somebody gets cancer or loses a child or has nervous system damage from their chemicals.” Zen Honeycutt Watch the whole episode on CHDTV ⬇️

Children’s Health Defense

28,711 просмотров • 1 год назад

I still can’t get an answer from Republican leadership: why does their farm bill shield pesticide companies like Bayer-Monsanto from liability for selling toxic pesticides that cause cancer? If the products are so safe, what are they so afraid of?
0:45

I still can’t get an answer from Republican leadership: why does their farm bill shield pesticide companies like Bayer-Monsanto from liability for selling toxic pesticides that cause cancer? If the products are so safe, what are they so afraid of?

Rep. Jim McGovern

80,794 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 NICOLE SHANAHAN: WARREN & BERNIE TOOK MILLIONS FROM BIG PHARMA “People are publishing how much money senators at today’s confirmation hearing received from pharma—and it’s astounding. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie together have amassed millions from Big Pharma. That’s not just for their races—I’ve analyzed it. They’re taking money to act as a marketing extension for these companies and ensure our tax dollars keep buying their products.” Source: Chief Nerd Nicole Shanahan
1:42

🇺🇸 NICOLE SHANAHAN: WARREN & BERNIE TOOK MILLIONS FROM BIG PHARMA “People are publishing how much money senators at today’s confirmation hearing received from pharma—and it’s astounding. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie together have amassed millions from Big Pharma. That’s not just for their races—I’ve analyzed it. They’re taking money to act as a marketing extension for these companies and ensure our tax dollars keep buying their products.” Source: Chief Nerd Nicole Shanahan

Mario Nawfal

226,997 просмотров • 1 год назад

CNBC: "Vaccine makers like yourself are largely shielded from liability. If the products are safe and effective, what is the need to continue to have these liability shields?" BOURLA: "If the product is not safe and effective we'd never get approval from FDA"
1:14

CNBC: "Vaccine makers like yourself are largely shielded from liability. If the products are safe and effective, what is the need to continue to have these liability shields?" BOURLA: "If the product is not safe and effective we'd never get approval from FDA"

Chief Nerd

1,408,981 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨BREAKING: The 'Hitman' of Big Pharma: How Johnson and Johnson Leaves Small Companies in Ruins “I’m still lying to them.” “We basically learned from that company and then made our own process. It’s a little unethical… then they were actually filing for bankruptcy.” “Technically, we could do whatever we want.” Johnson & Johnson
5:37

🚨BREAKING: The 'Hitman' of Big Pharma: How Johnson and Johnson Leaves Small Companies in Ruins “I’m still lying to them.” “We basically learned from that company and then made our own process. It’s a little unethical… then they were actually filing for bankruptcy.” “Technically, we could do whatever we want.” Johnson & Johnson

Project Veritas

439,096 просмотров • 1 год назад

Big Pharma has form in producing dangerous products, being fined billions, yet still making a profit. Except for childhood vaccines. So they blackmailed Ronald Reagan into giving them liability protection. Del Bigtree - ‘It’s in court documents. We are losing so much money from death and injury cases. Lawsuits against our vaccine products. That we cannot make a profit.’ It’s insane that we would allow this to happen to our children.
2:10

Big Pharma has form in producing dangerous products, being fined billions, yet still making a profit. Except for childhood vaccines. So they blackmailed Ronald Reagan into giving them liability protection. Del Bigtree - ‘It’s in court documents. We are losing so much money from death and injury cases. Lawsuits against our vaccine products. That we cannot make a profit.’ It’s insane that we would allow this to happen to our children.

Kat A 🌸

30,413 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Dr. Peter McCullough Calls On Trump to REPEAL the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act This would strip Big Pharma of its liability shield, making them accountable for injuries caused by their products. “Americans deserve safe vaccines. And when they are applied, the company should stand behind their products, and they should have this liability shield removed,” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® said. Dr. McCullough also urged president-elect Trump to pull the COVID jabs off the market. “They have not had the safety track record America wanted to see. And sadly, so many have suffered injuries, disabilities, and even death.”
1:04

Dr. Peter McCullough Calls On Trump to REPEAL the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act This would strip Big Pharma of its liability shield, making them accountable for injuries caused by their products. “Americans deserve safe vaccines. And when they are applied, the company should stand behind their products, and they should have this liability shield removed,” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® said. Dr. McCullough also urged president-elect Trump to pull the COVID jabs off the market. “They have not had the safety track record America wanted to see. And sadly, so many have suffered injuries, disabilities, and even death.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

869,715 просмотров • 1 год назад

RFK Jr. sounds the alarm on HSB 737, a new bill to grant pesticide manufacturers IMMUNITY for poisoning Americans Chemical companies literally argued they need immunity because lawsuits over the damages caused by their products will “put them out of business.” RFK: “This is the apogee for corporate socialism. It’s a license for chemical companies to poison Americans with NO liability.”
0:56

RFK Jr. sounds the alarm on HSB 737, a new bill to grant pesticide manufacturers IMMUNITY for poisoning Americans Chemical companies literally argued they need immunity because lawsuits over the damages caused by their products will “put them out of business.” RFK: “This is the apogee for corporate socialism. It’s a license for chemical companies to poison Americans with NO liability.”

Holden Culotta

273,396 просмотров • 1 год назад

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 Liability Shield for Companies Should be Rescinded Americans deserve safe bio-pharmaceutical products. This would effectively force companies to remove vaccines including mRNA Pfizer Inc. Moderna and Spike antigen Novavax from the market and face a tsunami of liability litigation from injured and disabled patients. Going forward, companies would do rigorous safety testing as they would face standard liability as with any drug in the US. Real America's Voice (RAV) John Solomon Amanda Head
1:08

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 Liability Shield for Companies Should be Rescinded Americans deserve safe bio-pharmaceutical products. This would effectively force companies to remove vaccines including mRNA Pfizer Inc. Moderna and Spike antigen Novavax from the market and face a tsunami of liability litigation from injured and disabled patients. Going forward, companies would do rigorous safety testing as they would face standard liability as with any drug in the US. Real America's Voice (RAV) John Solomon Amanda Head

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

191,440 просмотров • 1 год назад

The FDA is quick to approve experimental drugs for billion dollar Big Pharma companies, but won’t ban toxic chemicals from our products & food. The utter incompetence of the FDA is intolerable.
1:21

The FDA is quick to approve experimental drugs for billion dollar Big Pharma companies, but won’t ban toxic chemicals from our products & food. The utter incompetence of the FDA is intolerable.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna

109,116 просмотров • 1 год назад

RFK Jr. just told Joe Rogan it would be a huge mistake for the Supreme Court to give pesticide companies liability protection from harm. “There’s a lawsuit before the Supreme Court… that asked for federal preemption.” “That would mean that if the federal label says that this is safe, these state lawsuits cannot be brought.” “It would throw out a lot of the state lawsuits and effectively gives them immunity from liability, which to me it’s not good to give any company immunity from liability.” “It takes away all incentive for them to make the product safer.” Secretary Kennedy Joe Rogan
0:56

RFK Jr. just told Joe Rogan it would be a huge mistake for the Supreme Court to give pesticide companies liability protection from harm. “There’s a lawsuit before the Supreme Court… that asked for federal preemption.” “That would mean that if the federal label says that this is safe, these state lawsuits cannot be brought.” “It would throw out a lot of the state lawsuits and effectively gives them immunity from liability, which to me it’s not good to give any company immunity from liability.” “It takes away all incentive for them to make the product safer.” Secretary Kennedy Joe Rogan

Children’s Health Defense

14,091 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

TUCKER CARLSON: SECTION 230 MADE BIG TECH UNTOUCHABLE "Section 230 is a section within the 1996 Communications Decency Act, and it is the piece of legislation often credited for creating the internet. It's the framework that Congress came up with at the dawn of the internet to put parameters around what this is, to protect companies as they grew, to set laws around this new technology. One of the laws that they made, Section 230, shields internet providers' platforms from lawsuits. It gives them legal liability from lawsuits on the basis of slander, obscenity, and things that are on their platforms that they didn't create. The distinction allows the platforms to let other people post whatever they want without getting sued for it. They cannot be held liable. These big companies cannot be held liable for slander, hate speech, or anything really on their platforms. As a result of this law, those platforms have come to dominate news and information globally." Source: Tucker Carlson
0:59

TUCKER CARLSON: SECTION 230 MADE BIG TECH UNTOUCHABLE "Section 230 is a section within the 1996 Communications Decency Act, and it is the piece of legislation often credited for creating the internet. It's the framework that Congress came up with at the dawn of the internet to put parameters around what this is, to protect companies as they grew, to set laws around this new technology. One of the laws that they made, Section 230, shields internet providers' platforms from lawsuits. It gives them legal liability from lawsuits on the basis of slander, obscenity, and things that are on their platforms that they didn't create. The distinction allows the platforms to let other people post whatever they want without getting sued for it. They cannot be held liable. These big companies cannot be held liable for slander, hate speech, or anything really on their platforms. As a result of this law, those platforms have come to dominate news and information globally." Source: Tucker Carlson

Mario Nawfal

213,568 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад