Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

TUCKER CARLSON: SECTION 230 MADE BIG TECH UNTOUCHABLE "Section 230 is a section within the 1996 Communications Decency Act, and it is the piece of legislation often credited for creating the internet. It's the framework that Congress came up with at the dawn of the internet to put parameters...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

2,682,860 subscribers

213,568 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Kash Patel suggests going after the Monetary Backbone of Social Media Companies for allowing Predators and Pedophile’s to Thrive — Reforming Section 230 Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. § 230) is a U.S. law that provides immunity to online platforms from liability for content posted by users. If Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is rescinded (or repealed outright), it would remove the legal immunity that currently shields online platforms—such as social media sites, forums, and websites hosting user-generated content—from liability for third-party posts. This could fundamentally reshape the internet
1:00

Kash Patel suggests going after the Monetary Backbone of Social Media Companies for allowing Predators and Pedophile’s to Thrive — Reforming Section 230 Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. § 230) is a U.S. law that provides immunity to online platforms from liability for content posted by users. If Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is rescinded (or repealed outright), it would remove the legal immunity that currently shields online platforms—such as social media sites, forums, and websites hosting user-generated content—from liability for third-party posts. This could fundamentally reshape the internet

MJTruthUltra

45,930 views • 10 months ago

It has been nearly 30 years since Congress passed Section 230 and gave platforms immunity from lawsuits. Our children deserve a safer internet and tech companies need to be held accountable for what happens on their platforms.
0:54

It has been nearly 30 years since Congress passed Section 230 and gave platforms immunity from lawsuits. Our children deserve a safer internet and tech companies need to be held accountable for what happens on their platforms.

Senator Amy Klobuchar

10,519 views • 7 months ago

This is a must watch… Tucker Carlson discusses Section 230 and the threat of Free Speech ending in America, despite President Trump in office I’ve been back and forth on section 230 over the years.. but Tucker solidified it for me. We need to pay attention to where this is going. Getting rid of Section 230 will end free speech on Social media in America as we know it because every word we say, social media companies would be held liable. Now, I’m hoping President Trump does not do this.. I don’t think he will… but there are certainly politicians on BOTH sides of the isle calling for the end of section 230. The other day, Kash Patel himself said he would look at revising Section 230 in his hearing. President Trump also hinted at it. If it’s a revision, it needs to be dissected inside and out.
33:23

This is a must watch… Tucker Carlson discusses Section 230 and the threat of Free Speech ending in America, despite President Trump in office I’ve been back and forth on section 230 over the years.. but Tucker solidified it for me. We need to pay attention to where this is going. Getting rid of Section 230 will end free speech on Social media in America as we know it because every word we say, social media companies would be held liable. Now, I’m hoping President Trump does not do this.. I don’t think he will… but there are certainly politicians on BOTH sides of the isle calling for the end of section 230. The other day, Kash Patel himself said he would look at revising Section 230 in his hearing. President Trump also hinted at it. If it’s a revision, it needs to be dissected inside and out.

MJTruthUltra

44,329 views • 9 months ago

Section 230 is a relic of the early internet. Signed into law in 1996, when “logging on” meant a dial-up connection and social media didn’t exist. It helped the internet grow. But today, it’s helping tear our society apart. In the real world, speech has limits. You can’t threaten violence or spread harm without consequences and you shouldn’t be able to do it online either. Over the past 30 years, the internet has gone from a luxury to a necessity, and social media has turned from an experiment into a massive business. These companies shouldn’t enjoy blanket immunity while their platforms spread threats, violence, and hate. It’s time for Congress to update Section 230 and hold social media companies accountable for keeping dangerous content off their platforms, just like we expect responsibility and accountability everywhere else.
0:47

Section 230 is a relic of the early internet. Signed into law in 1996, when “logging on” meant a dial-up connection and social media didn’t exist. It helped the internet grow. But today, it’s helping tear our society apart. In the real world, speech has limits. You can’t threaten violence or spread harm without consequences and you shouldn’t be able to do it online either. Over the past 30 years, the internet has gone from a luxury to a necessity, and social media has turned from an experiment into a massive business. These companies shouldn’t enjoy blanket immunity while their platforms spread threats, violence, and hate. It’s time for Congress to update Section 230 and hold social media companies accountable for keeping dangerous content off their platforms, just like we expect responsibility and accountability everywhere else.

Senator Joe Manchin

10,548 views • 8 months ago

🚨🇺🇸 ELON: DEMOCRATS COULD SHUT DOWN X BY DELETING SECTION 230 "They will unequivocally try. If Democrats hold power in the Senate, House, and presidency, they could pass a law to delete Section 230, making us liable for everything said on the platform. With nearly 600 million monthly users, it’s impossible to regulate speech like that. We’d be instantly bankrupt." Source: TCN Tucker Carlson Elon Musk
1:12

🚨🇺🇸 ELON: DEMOCRATS COULD SHUT DOWN X BY DELETING SECTION 230 "They will unequivocally try. If Democrats hold power in the Senate, House, and presidency, they could pass a law to delete Section 230, making us liable for everything said on the platform. With nearly 600 million monthly users, it’s impossible to regulate speech like that. We’d be instantly bankrupt." Source: TCN Tucker Carlson Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

233,259 views • 1 year ago

"One of the things I learned from CBA negations is: They aren't smarter than us...I think we sometimes are victims of having this belief that because these people have made it to the top of their profession that they are as good at what they do as we are at what we do. They aren't....It's a mistake to think that whatever is holding back the union is understanding some complex theories of business or law. That ain't it." – Domonique goes deep on what changes need to be made within the NFLPA.
2:01

"One of the things I learned from CBA negations is: They aren't smarter than us...I think we sometimes are victims of having this belief that because these people have made it to the top of their profession that they are as good at what they do as we are at what we do. They aren't....It's a mistake to think that whatever is holding back the union is understanding some complex theories of business or law. That ain't it." – Domonique goes deep on what changes need to be made within the NFLPA.

The Domonique Foxworth Show

159,108 views • 1 year ago

At yesterday’s Sunset Section 230 press conference, Joseph Gordon-Levitt made it clear: when platforms profit from harm, they should be held accountable. Section 230 has allowed tech giants to dodge responsibility while exploitation, trafficking, and abuse spread online — the Sunset Section 230 Act would finally end that blanket immunity and give victims a path to justice. It’s time to put people over profits. Take action below. 👇⚖️ #BigTechAccountability #NCOSE #BigTech #KidsOnlineSafety #Accountability #Section230 #CDASection230 #SunsetSection230 #JosephGordonLevitt #Actor #PressConference
0:47

At yesterday’s Sunset Section 230 press conference, Joseph Gordon-Levitt made it clear: when platforms profit from harm, they should be held accountable. Section 230 has allowed tech giants to dodge responsibility while exploitation, trafficking, and abuse spread online — the Sunset Section 230 Act would finally end that blanket immunity and give victims a path to justice. It’s time to put people over profits. Take action below. 👇⚖️ #BigTechAccountability #NCOSE #BigTech #KidsOnlineSafety #Accountability #Section230 #CDASection230 #SunsetSection230 #JosephGordonLevitt #Actor #PressConference

National Center on Sexual Exploitation

19,791 views • 5 months ago

Ep. 267: Social media = cigarettes? In March, juries in California and New Mexico delivered seminal verdicts holding Meta and YouTube liable for failing to protect young users from harm. Both verdicts found that the companies were negligent in the design or operation of their platforms and that each company knew their platforms could be dangerous when used by a minor. The courts found that the design elements of the platforms could be separated from the content hosted on the platforms, thus removing the need to consider the First Amendment or Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. CEO & founder of techdirt & The Copia Institute Mike Masnick joins FIRE's Nico Perrino to break down the rulings and their possible free speech implications. Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 02:29 Why these verdicts scare the hell out of Mike 10:34 Are social media algorithms “addictive”? 21:45 Did Meta fail to protect kids? 30:37 The First Amendment and Section 230 43:13 Is social media the new Big Tobacco? 55:15 The role of parents in social media use 59:04: Outro Enjoy listening to the podcast? Donate to FIRE today and get exclusive content like member webinars, special episodes, and more. If you became a FIRE Member through a donation to FIRE at and would like access to Substack’s paid subscriber podcast feed, please email sotospeak@thefire.org.
59:44

Ep. 267: Social media = cigarettes? In March, juries in California and New Mexico delivered seminal verdicts holding Meta and YouTube liable for failing to protect young users from harm. Both verdicts found that the companies were negligent in the design or operation of their platforms and that each company knew their platforms could be dangerous when used by a minor. The courts found that the design elements of the platforms could be separated from the content hosted on the platforms, thus removing the need to consider the First Amendment or Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. CEO & founder of techdirt & The Copia Institute Mike Masnick joins FIRE's Nico Perrino to break down the rulings and their possible free speech implications. Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 02:29 Why these verdicts scare the hell out of Mike 10:34 Are social media algorithms “addictive”? 21:45 Did Meta fail to protect kids? 30:37 The First Amendment and Section 230 43:13 Is social media the new Big Tobacco? 55:15 The role of parents in social media use 59:04: Outro Enjoy listening to the podcast? Donate to FIRE today and get exclusive content like member webinars, special episodes, and more. If you became a FIRE Member through a donation to FIRE at and would like access to Substack’s paid subscriber podcast feed, please email [email protected].

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

19,086 views • 3 months ago

TUCKER CARLSON: WIKIPEDIA'S ANONYMOUS, UNTOUCHABLES ARE SHAPING AMERICANS' UNDERSTANDING Larry Sanger(Co-Founder of Wikipedia): "85% of the most powerful accounts on Wikipedia on the editorial side are anonymous." Tucker: "These are the people who are shaping Americans' understanding of the world, of their own country, of themselves, of reality itself? We don't know who they are because their identities are hidden?" Larry: "They can libel people with impunity as they do you. There is no legal recourse because they are anonymous. The Wikimedia Foundation enjoys Section 230 immunity, which means it can't be sued in the United States." Source: Tucker Carlson Larry Sanger
0:33

TUCKER CARLSON: WIKIPEDIA'S ANONYMOUS, UNTOUCHABLES ARE SHAPING AMERICANS' UNDERSTANDING Larry Sanger(Co-Founder of Wikipedia): "85% of the most powerful accounts on Wikipedia on the editorial side are anonymous." Tucker: "These are the people who are shaping Americans' understanding of the world, of their own country, of themselves, of reality itself? We don't know who they are because their identities are hidden?" Larry: "They can libel people with impunity as they do you. There is no legal recourse because they are anonymous. The Wikimedia Foundation enjoys Section 230 immunity, which means it can't be sued in the United States." Source: Tucker Carlson Larry Sanger

Mario Nawfal

76,654 views • 9 months ago

WATCH: RFK Jr. reveals that 37 hours after Kamala and Biden were installed into the White House, they opened an illegal portal between social media giants and the FBI, CIA, CDC, etc, to begin the rampant censorship of Americans Platforms were THREATENED to comply, or else "their section 230 immunity was in jeopardy." "These people are cynical, terrible people, and they knew what they were doing was breaking the law." - Robert F. Kennedy Jr This man is blowing the whistle on everything the people have been blinded to for decades.
2:27

WATCH: RFK Jr. reveals that 37 hours after Kamala and Biden were installed into the White House, they opened an illegal portal between social media giants and the FBI, CIA, CDC, etc, to begin the rampant censorship of Americans Platforms were THREATENED to comply, or else "their section 230 immunity was in jeopardy." "These people are cynical, terrible people, and they knew what they were doing was breaking the law." - Robert F. Kennedy Jr This man is blowing the whistle on everything the people have been blinded to for decades.

George

2,120,023 views • 1 year ago

Hillary Clinton taunts tampering with the election against Donald Trump: "Maybe what they'll do this next time, is to REALLY disrupt the actual election. Shut down the servers that you send results to. Interfere with the operation of voting machines, because still, TOO MANY OF THEM ARE LINKED TO THE INTERNET." Yet they LIED and told us NONE of them were connected to the internet? 🤔 They know what they did and they did it it right in our faces while we called them out for it and they BANNED us from social media platforms to prevent us from talking about it.
0:26

Hillary Clinton taunts tampering with the election against Donald Trump: "Maybe what they'll do this next time, is to REALLY disrupt the actual election. Shut down the servers that you send results to. Interfere with the operation of voting machines, because still, TOO MANY OF THEM ARE LINKED TO THE INTERNET." Yet they LIED and told us NONE of them were connected to the internet? 🤔 They know what they did and they did it it right in our faces while we called them out for it and they BANNED us from social media platforms to prevent us from talking about it.

Bridgett Fertig

76,830 views • 2 months ago

Hillary Clinton taunts tampering with the election against Donald Trump: "Maybe what they'll do this next time, is to REALLY disrupt the actual election. Shut down the servers that you send results to. Interfere with the operation of voting machines, because still, TOO MANY OF THEM ARE LINKED TO THE INTERNET." Yet they LIED and told us NONE of them were connected to the internet? 🤔 They know what they did and they did it it right in our faces while we called them out for it and they BANNED us from social media platforms to prevent us from talking about it.
0:26

Hillary Clinton taunts tampering with the election against Donald Trump: "Maybe what they'll do this next time, is to REALLY disrupt the actual election. Shut down the servers that you send results to. Interfere with the operation of voting machines, because still, TOO MANY OF THEM ARE LINKED TO THE INTERNET." Yet they LIED and told us NONE of them were connected to the internet? 🤔 They know what they did and they did it it right in our faces while we called them out for it and they BANNED us from social media platforms to prevent us from talking about it.

Bridgett Fertig

48,275 views • 1 month ago

Roblox responds to the claims that the people who say, "How is this allowed on Roblox..." They say that if other platforms allow it, then that means that they are at a very high standard when it comes to their policy, and that it's "ironic"
1:04

Roblox responds to the claims that the people who say, "How is this allowed on Roblox..." They say that if other platforms allow it, then that means that they are at a very high standard when it comes to their policy, and that it's "ironic"

Sniter

166,632 views • 11 months ago

Tucker Carlson: "The Israeli government believes it is okay to kill people on the basis of their bloodline. They are 'Amalek,' as the Prime Minister often says, again and again and again."
0:38

Tucker Carlson: "The Israeli government believes it is okay to kill people on the basis of their bloodline. They are 'Amalek,' as the Prime Minister often says, again and again and again."

Chris Menahan 🇺🇸

50,451 views • 4 months ago

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: Tucker Carlson just claimed that there are members an elite occult that engage in demonic ritual abuse of children. Tucker claims that ‘it as part of a sinister exchange for power.’ Tucker also claims that they do this to children for the excitement and their ability to corrupt a child’s innocence. Tucker goes on to state that they sacrifice the beauty and innocence of these children for money and fame.
2:10

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: Tucker Carlson just claimed that there are members an elite occult that engage in demonic ritual abuse of children. Tucker claims that ‘it as part of a sinister exchange for power.’ Tucker also claims that they do this to children for the excitement and their ability to corrupt a child’s innocence. Tucker goes on to state that they sacrifice the beauty and innocence of these children for money and fame.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

1,208,926 views • 1 year ago

Section 230 is exactly why platforms can ignore digital violence and online abuse like this. I know this firsthand. I was a victim of the 2014 iCloud hack, and were uploaded to sites like Motherless without my consent. It took years of fighting to remove that content—while it continued to spread. That’s the problem. Takedowns happen after the damage is done. The Protect Act fixes this at the source. It requires age and consent verification for uploaders to adult platforms, stopping digital violence before it begins. We don’t need better cleanup. We need prevention.
2:16

Section 230 is exactly why platforms can ignore digital violence and online abuse like this. I know this firsthand. I was a victim of the 2014 iCloud hack, and were uploaded to sites like Motherless without my consent. It took years of fighting to remove that content—while it continued to spread. That’s the problem. Takedowns happen after the damage is done. The Protect Act fixes this at the source. It requires age and consent verification for uploaders to adult platforms, stopping digital violence before it begins. We don’t need better cleanup. We need prevention.

Uldouz

11,182 views • 2 months ago

Biden’s Censorship Frenzy Comes to an End After Ordering the Takedown of Posts from RFK Jr. & Tucker Carlson “Email chains between high-ranking White House officials and social media platforms specifically targeting certain individuals such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr, Tucker Carlson, Tomi Lahren, and others — directly targeting them and asking those social media platforms to take their content down,” disclosed Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry. “We also saw from the FBI evidence which showed that they knew the Hunter Biden laptop to be factual and yet didn’t tell the social media platforms that as well. So there are a number of things that as we uncovered information in the discovery process of this case that was shocking to us.” Full Interview:
1:16

Biden’s Censorship Frenzy Comes to an End After Ordering the Takedown of Posts from RFK Jr. & Tucker Carlson “Email chains between high-ranking White House officials and social media platforms specifically targeting certain individuals such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr, Tucker Carlson, Tomi Lahren, and others — directly targeting them and asking those social media platforms to take their content down,” disclosed Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry. “We also saw from the FBI evidence which showed that they knew the Hunter Biden laptop to be factual and yet didn’t tell the social media platforms that as well. So there are a number of things that as we uncovered information in the discovery process of this case that was shocking to us.” Full Interview:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

455,037 views • 3 years ago

Hon. Derek Brown, Office of the Utah Attorney General, calls out the "bait and switch" being pursued by blue states when they sue energy companies for legal energy production: "That's what makes a lot of these climate lawsuits frustrating for me — the companies that are being sued are being sued for doing not only what they are legally allowed to do, but also for following a very extensive and long list of regulations and permitting requirements to get to that point. And so what we basically said is regulations and laws ought to mean something, and that's what I said… 'Do we want to have legislation through legislators or through lawsuits? What's it going to be?' I said, 'Look, you're the lawmakers. We should legislate through laws and not through lawsuits, because laws are predictable — with lawsuits, it's anyone's guess.'"
0:58

Hon. Derek Brown, Office of the Utah Attorney General, calls out the "bait and switch" being pursued by blue states when they sue energy companies for legal energy production: "That's what makes a lot of these climate lawsuits frustrating for me — the companies that are being sued are being sued for doing not only what they are legally allowed to do, but also for following a very extensive and long list of regulations and permitting requirements to get to that point. And so what we basically said is regulations and laws ought to mean something, and that's what I said… 'Do we want to have legislation through legislators or through lawsuits? What's it going to be?' I said, 'Look, you're the lawmakers. We should legislate through laws and not through lawsuits, because laws are predictable — with lawsuits, it's anyone's guess.'"

Federalist Society

12,510 views • 1 month ago