Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨BIG: U.S. REGULATORS APPROVE TOKENIZED SECURITIES FOR BANKS U.S. financial regulators have clarified that banks can hold and deal in tokenized securities under existing rules. The Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC issued guidance confirming no distinction between tokenized and traditional securities. Regulators said the technology used to issue or...

15,202 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 CRYPTO: IMF DECLARES TOKENIZATION A "STRUCTURAL SHIFT" IN FINANCIAL ARCHITECTURE The International Monetary Fund has published a formal note stating that tokenization is reshaping regulated finance and constitutes a structural shift rather than a marginal efficiency improvement. The note, authored by Tobias Adrian, the IMF's Financial Counsellor and head of its Monetary and Capital Markets Department, describes how permissioned shared ledgers, programmable financial assets, and smart contract-based risk management are fundamentally altering how settlement, liquidity, and systemic risk operate. The IMF says the most consequential transformation is happening within the regulated financial system itself, including banks, asset managers, and market infrastructure providers, where tokenization enables atomic settlement, continuous liquidity management, and embedded compliance. Tokenized real-world assets have already reached approximately $27.5 billion as of early April, with US Treasury products accounting for over $12 billion of that total. However, the IMF also warned that the same features making tokenized markets efficient could amplify instability. Automated margin calls, real-time settlement, and programmable financial flows could accelerate liquidity stress during volatility. Traditional systems have built-in delays that act as shock absorbers. Tokenized systems may transmit stress instantly across participants. The note calls for clear policy frameworks, robust code governance, legal certainty, and international coordination.

BSCN

11,818 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

We just published our latest research: "Tokenized Deposits: The Future of Money." The report breaks down how commercial bank deposits are moving onto blockchain infrastructure, and what that means for the financial system. Here's what we found: 🪙 Tokenized deposits, stablecoins, and CBDCs serve different roles. They complement each other rather than compete. 🪙 J.P. Morgan, Citi, BNY, Standard Chartered, HSBC and Lloyds are already running live tokenized deposit services for institutional clients. 🪙 Five US regional banks announced a shared tokenized deposit network in February 2026, signaling adoption beyond the top tier. 🪙 87% of financial institutions are exploring tokenization. 🪙 Digital currencies are projected to process up to $13 trillion in transaction value by 2030. 🪙 Global customer deposits totaled $103 trillion in 2024. Even a fraction moving on-chain creates a market far larger than today's stablecoin sector. The regulatory picture is also shifting. The US GENIUS Act provides clarity for stablecoins while keeping tokenized deposits under existing banking law. The UK's GBTD pilot is live with seven major banks. The ECB is advancing the Digital Euro. And in the UAE, the Digital Dirham has gone live on the mBridge platform. The big challenge ahead: interoperability. Tokenized deposits remain liabilities of individual banks. Scaling requires networks that let deposits issued by one bank settle with another. Projects like BIS Project Agora, Partior, and the UK's GBTD are working on exactly this. This report was shaped with contributions from 15 organizations, including Standard Chartered, Citi, BNY, J.P. Morgan, Ondo Finance, Digital Asset, Canton Network, LayerZero, BMW, ABN AMRO, ERC3643.org, TRON DAO, UK Finance, Cambridge University and Alchemy. A big thank you to anyone involved 🤝

RWA.io

10,661 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Now that the GENIUS act is in the home stretch, there’s a lot of talk on what stablecoin is compliant. Is it $xrp/ripple/RLUSD? Nope Is it $usdc/circle? Nope Is it $tether? Nope It’s $tel(Telcoin) Telcoin is uniquely well-positioned under the proposed GENIUS Act due to its Digital Asset Bank Charter granted by Nebraska under the Transactions in Digital Assets Act (LB649). This codified state law explicitly authorizes the issuance and management of digital assets, including stablecoins, by chartered entities. Importantly, the GENIUS Act stipulates that only “state-qualified issuers” operating within states that have adopted a formal, legislative framework for digital assets will be eligible to issue compliant stablecoins. Nebraska’s statute clearly meets that federal requirement, giving Telcoin a clear and defensible legal pathway toward national regulatory compliance. In contrast, RLUSD, issued by Standard Custody & Trust and overseen by the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), operates under a regulatory regime based on guidance rather than statute. Although NYDFS published stablecoin guidance in 2022 — mandating 1:1 reserves, auditability, and redemption rights — New York has not enacted a specific stablecoin law. That distinction matters: under the GENIUS Act, regulatory guidance alone may not satisfy federal requirements if it lacks the backing of an enacted state statute. This leaves RLUSD in a gray area of compliance, dependent on whether federal regulators view NYDFS’s oversight as sufficiently robust. The same regulatory uncertainty applies to Circle’s USDC, which is primarily issued under various state money transmitter licenses and a limited-purpose trust charter from NYDFS. Circle has advocated for federal legislation and cooperates with regulators, but like RLUSD, it lacks a foundation in a state statutory framework for digital assets. As with RLUSD, USDC’s path to GENIUS Act compliance hinges on whether its existing regulatory structure will be recognized as equivalent to the Act’s “state-qualified issuer” standard — a significant unknown. In summary, Telcoin’s operations under a legislative charter place it in a stronger position than both RLUSD and USDC under the GENIUS Act. Where others depend on discretionary recognition of regulatory guidance, Telcoin operates on the basis of codified law — a key distinction that could define future leadership in the U.S. stablecoin market.

BZ

31,932 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

$MMTLP I have more questions 1) Why did FINRA say broker dealers didn't have advance notice of the U3 halt when 8 broker dealer representatives approved the halt??? That was a lie. So why in the last 18 months hasn't Congress set a public hearing or issued subpoenas to FINRA and to every broker that allowed trading in $MMTLP? Start with Hilltop Securities. Its Managing Director Kelly Bell was among the 8 broker dealers representatives on the FINRA panel that voted to unexpectedly halt $MMTLP Yet her company, Hilltop Securities, is a broker dealer in Texas that allowed $MMTLP trading. 2)Why hasn't Congress held a public hearing and issued a subpoena for Hilltop's $MMTLP trading records? Kelly Bell's boss, Hilltop Securities CEO Brad Winges had an advisory role at the SEC so he has plenty of connections at the SEC and FINRA. Thinking out loud here, those connections might be helpful if his firm got into a bind with its $MMTLP position? (Thanks Jalen Duck Jalen, Jr. ) 3) Why hasn't Congress issued a subpoena to find out what conversations Winges, Bell or anyone connected to them, had about $MMTLP with Pete Sessions (Hilltop donated to his campaign), or anyone in his office, FINRA and/or U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 4) Why hasn't Congress held a public hearing to find out if Hilltop and others oversold $MMTLP? When an airline oversells a flight, it is often forced to pay big money to get passengers to take a different flight .. and it doesn't take them nearly 600 days to do it. If broker dealers oversold $MMTLP, and it's clear they did, they still HAVE to settle those trades. And they should have to pay the price investors are willing to accept. It's not a good look for democracy when people see Congress, the SEC and FINRA trying to protect their friends and donors and run out the clock on investors. Will $MMTLP be what upends the cozy relationships between Congress, regulators and broker dealers? Because people do turn on each other quickly when the pressure heats up. And the first one to speak up usually gets the best deal. The truth is easy to remember, lies not so much. BusyBrands 🇺🇸 Kurtis Anna JunkSavvy Timmy Donoghue Onehundredmph Richard Hofman HAM William P. Farrand Dennis Kneale WiseGuys Mark Faulk Mark R. Basile,Esq. Devin Nunes $FNGR $GTII $NWBO $ENZC $AMC $GME $DJT $SCLX $BB $KODK $WULF

kristen shaughnessy

127,953 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren