正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 Big Week Ahead on one side Millennium Prize Problems ( they are contacting mathematicians will give few citations to them in solution to make them happy this time) for consumer side > fable 5.2 > opus 5.2 , Sol 6 > grok 4.7 and gemini 4 pro if... show more

Chetaslua

35,974 subscribers

29,301 次观看 • 9 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

16 条评论

lyra 的头像

lyra9 天前

@notjazii

Afterkind 的头像

Afterkind9 天前

Accelerating looks like ASI in 3 months. OpenAI could theoretically say "fuck everything, we know this will work", shut down chatgpt and codex and dedicate their entire compute for a massive training run and having Bel optimize the entire thing until a 50T behemoth comes out without safety guardrails. That would be the "fuck it, we're accelerating" case.

刘朝 Zhao Liu 的头像

刘朝 Zhao Liu9 天前

The release pile-up is exciting, yet routing and access labels make the comparison slippery. A stable model ID, cohort trace, and fixed replay set would show whether Gemini 4 Pro is a new checkpoint or a serving-path surprise.

lost in latency 的头像

lost in latency9 天前

is 6 sol oai's answer to fable 5.2 and opus 5.2?

Chetaslua 的头像

Chetaslua9 天前

no it is the question actually

lost in latency 的头像

lost in latency9 天前

yeah my question as well

刘朝 Zhao Liu 的头像

刘朝 Zhao Liu9 天前

The release cadence is accelerating, but the useful comparison needs a stable harness. Track model identity, routing label, tool budget, latency, and recovery on the same long task; otherwise a packed launch week produces headlines without a durable frontier map.

Marsonal 的头像

Marsonal9 天前

Gemini 4 releases next week?

Shesaidmewakeup 的头像

Shesaidmewakeup9 天前

If all of those land in one week, pacing is just the press word for a traffic jam. The consumer side will feel it first.

AlLeakWire 的头像

AlLeakWire9 天前

Bro is gemini 4 pro comparable to the opus 5.2 and gpt 6 astra

Chetaslua 的头像

Chetaslua9 天前

i will get hate but gemini 4 pro is bad at tool calling you are listening this from me first , but in my experience in last two days this model forget he is in code sandbox env

AlLeakWire 的头像

AlLeakWire9 天前

Is that the model confirms to be gemini 4

Chetaslua 的头像

Chetaslua9 天前

this is what our majority consensus in discord community

AlLeakWire 的头像

AlLeakWire9 天前

Means it was not the google comeback this year

Chetaslua 的头像

Chetaslua9 天前

its good google model , best in frontend and one shot demo and day to day use

Samuel Hu 的头像

Samuel Hu9 天前

the routed model path is the useful comparison. i’d keep one ugly repo task fixed across all three, then compare diff quality and recovery, not just the max-setting score

相关视频

opus 5 is getting routed to opus 5.2 tested opus 5 on xhigh with the same prompt in devin and claude code but results came out really different > claude code one is clean and more detailed > while devin one is almost there but not the same opus 5 in cc used to be lazy and hard to communicate with, but something changed in the last 2 days now it works for longer and is way easier to communicate with anthropic did same with fable release too where some users were being routed to fable 5.1 so it’s very likely opus 5 is getting routed to 5.2 in claude code can you guys tests and lemme know if it's getting routed for you or not?

opus 5 is getting routed to opus 5.2 tested opus 5 on xhigh with the same prompt in devin and claude code but results came out really different > claude code one is clean and more detailed > while devin one is almost there but not the same opus 5 in cc used to be lazy and hard to communicate with, but something changed in the last 2 days now it works for longer and is way easier to communicate with anthropic did same with fable release too where some users were being routed to fable 5.1 so it’s very likely opus 5 is getting routed to 5.2 in claude code can you guys tests and lemme know if it's getting routed for you or not?

J A Z I I

140,113 次观看 • 13 天前

Fable 5.2 made this video and game both < routed from fable 5.1 >

Fable 5.2 made this video and game both < routed from fable 5.1 >

Chetaslua

744,420 次观看 • 9 天前

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Opus 5 same prompt to each model and i wasn't expecting gemini 3.8 flash to be this fast! build time: > Opus 5: 24 minutes > 3.8 Flash: 37 seconds 💀 if gemini is given same time as opus 5 it will mog the hell out of opus in terms of quality too which one would you choose here?

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Opus 5 same prompt to each model and i wasn't expecting gemini 3.8 flash to be this fast! build time: > Opus 5: 24 minutes > 3.8 Flash: 37 seconds 💀 if gemini is given same time as opus 5 it will mog the hell out of opus in terms of quality too which one would you choose here?

Tim Jayas

76,945 次观看 • 25 天前

Holy Smokes GLM 5.2 beats Opus in many webdev task😳 This is the best open model , according to jietang said FABLE like model from them before Q1 2027 . i can trust them , just make glm fat with vision we will have fable Left Right

Holy Smokes GLM 5.2 beats Opus in many webdev task😳 This is the best open model , according to jietang said FABLE like model from them before Q1 2027 . i can trust them , just make glm fat with vision we will have fable Left Right

Chetaslua

22,926 次观看 • 3 个月前

sonnet 5 is routing to sonnet 5.2 looks like all 3 claude models are now routing for some users and from testing: > opus 5.2 is the biggest jump > sonnet 5.2 looks way better too > fable 5.2 is only a small jump at this point anthropic got whole new claude 5.2 family getting ready to release when do you think they will release them?

sonnet 5 is routing to sonnet 5.2 looks like all 3 claude models are now routing for some users and from testing: > opus 5.2 is the biggest jump > sonnet 5.2 looks way better too > fable 5.2 is only a small jump at this point anthropic got whole new claude 5.2 family getting ready to release when do you think they will release them?

J A Z I I

41,760 次观看 • 8 天前

Fable 5.2 is pure JS thats it one shot animal edition , i did not even prompt it to be so detailed and it made proper snacks for different animal for someone who saw my account first time may not how i have access to fable 5.2 just check my previous tweet and also opus 5.2 is being tested in claude web Boris Cherny can i get credits my 200$ subs plan is over Claude

Fable 5.2 is pure JS thats it one shot animal edition , i did not even prompt it to be so detailed and it made proper snacks for different animal for someone who saw my account first time may not how i have access to fable 5.2 just check my previous tweet and also opus 5.2 is being tested in claude web Boris Cherny can i get credits my 200$ subs plan is over Claude

Chetaslua

182,627 次观看 • 8 天前

Astra vs Fable 5 : Jump is same like opus 4.8 to fable 5 in quality side by side comparison on same prompts , this is why i am super hyped for openai < astra is the path to the bell of AGI iykyk>

Astra vs Fable 5 : Jump is same like opus 4.8 to fable 5 in quality side by side comparison on same prompts , this is why i am super hyped for openai < astra is the path to the bell of AGI iykyk>

Chetaslua

296,201 次观看 • 27 天前

I don't think people are ready for the discussion that sonnets mogs sol and opus mogs astra < remember few days ago sol = opus and fable = astra > This is sonnet 5.5 in ultracode mode enjoyy

I don't think people are ready for the discussion that sonnets mogs sol and opus mogs astra < remember few days ago sol = opus and fable = astra > This is sonnet 5.5 in ultracode mode enjoyy

Chetaslua

104,957 次观看 • 1 天前

I love using GLM 5.2 for web app iteration. My workflow: generate 6 variations, then pick the best one and continue iterating on it. I built Recast to make this even easier. Give it a prompt, get 6 variations, download the code for your favorite version, then continue iterating in your own coding agent. GLM 5.2 works really well for this use case since it's fast, cheap, and great at design. On average, you can make 3-6 landing pages with GLM 5.2 for every one you can generate with Opus 4.8. And the design variety of the GLM landing pages helps a lot with trying to think through what style you want to go with. Recast is launching soon (as a web app + skill).

I love using GLM 5.2 for web app iteration. My workflow: generate 6 variations, then pick the best one and continue iterating on it. I built Recast to make this even easier. Give it a prompt, get 6 variations, download the code for your favorite version, then continue iterating in your own coding agent. GLM 5.2 works really well for this use case since it's fast, cheap, and great at design. On average, you can make 3-6 landing pages with GLM 5.2 for every one you can generate with Opus 4.8. And the design variety of the GLM landing pages helps a lot with trying to think through what style you want to go with. Recast is launching soon (as a web app + skill).

Hassan

20,164 次观看 • 3 个月前

anthropic cooked hard with opus 5.2 after testing it for a whole day, i can say this model is so good > huge step up from opus 5 > on par with astra > faster than opus 5 > way better at frontend and 3d here’s one frontend test i ran and it’s the best output any model has given me even better than astra you can check fable 5.1 output with same prompt in QT and tbh opus 5.2 just mogs everyone here really hoping that anthropic will release this model officially this week

anthropic cooked hard with opus 5.2 after testing it for a whole day, i can say this model is so good > huge step up from opus 5 > on par with astra > faster than opus 5 > way better at frontend and 3d here’s one frontend test i ran and it’s the best output any model has given me even better than astra you can check fable 5.1 output with same prompt in QT and tbh opus 5.2 just mogs everyone here really hoping that anthropic will release this model officially this week

J A Z I I

40,402 次观看 • 12 天前

Grok 4.5 is first xAI model that win my heart 🫡 this is better then glm 5.2 and on par with current opus and gpt They cooked with the frontend too , like see this quality it made a website to showcase its benchmark and i asked it for water effects on background Elon Musk great job

Grok 4.5 is first xAI model that win my heart 🫡 this is better then glm 5.2 and on par with current opus and gpt They cooked with the frontend too , like see this quality it made a website to showcase its benchmark and i asked it for water effects on background Elon Musk great job

Chetaslua

49,206 次观看 • 2 个月前

Opus 5.5 : this is a year of growth on same prompt , last year it was gemini this year we have claude

Opus 5.5 : this is a year of growth on same prompt , last year it was gemini this year we have claude

Chetaslua

27,778 次观看 • 5 天前

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.8 Flash I capped Fable, Kimi & Sol at $2 and asked them to generate this beach scene. Fable 5.1: Looks good at first glance, but made many mistakes, like people sitting on the volleyball court. Kimi K3: It did well. There were no major bugs like in Fable 5.1, and everything looks good. Sol: Bad at 3D scenes as usual, but Astra will definitely fix that. Gemini 3.8 Flash: I ran it in a loop for 35+ mins and it cost $0.95. It didn’t understand what it was fixing. The output here is the enhanced version. IMO, not even Terra level. Gemini's benchmarks say Opus 5-level, but maybe not for spatial understanding. Gemini has other use cases. Which one did the best job?

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.8 Flash I capped Fable, Kimi & Sol at $2 and asked them to generate this beach scene. Fable 5.1: Looks good at first glance, but made many mistakes, like people sitting on the volleyball court. Kimi K3: It did well. There were no major bugs like in Fable 5.1, and everything looks good. Sol: Bad at 3D scenes as usual, but Astra will definitely fix that. Gemini 3.8 Flash: I ran it in a loop for 35+ mins and it cost $0.95. It didn’t understand what it was fixing. The output here is the enhanced version. IMO, not even Terra level. Gemini's benchmarks say Opus 5-level, but maybe not for spatial understanding. Gemini has other use cases. Which one did the best job?

Bhavy☄️

33,971 次观看 • 24 天前

Voxel Art of Eiffel Tower by Gemini 3.1 Pro High This is the best result i have seen , but praise side issues i faced > gemini app is worst and have low reasoning > antigravity always time out > 3.1 pro is not working in ai studio app building section > always time out and erros

Voxel Art of Eiffel Tower by Gemini 3.1 Pro High This is the best result i have seen , but praise side issues i faced > gemini app is worst and have low reasoning > antigravity always time out > 3.1 pro is not working in ai studio app building section > always time out and erros

Chetaslua

27,537 次观看 • 7 个月前

Holy Shit This is insane result 🤯 I used opus 4.6 as a reviewer/planner and 4 worker minimax M2.7 agent and this the result Voxel art of eiffel tower < loop set to 5 that means opus will tell MiniMax (official) to make it better 5 times >

Holy Shit This is insane result 🤯 I used opus 4.6 as a reviewer/planner and 4 worker minimax M2.7 agent and this the result Voxel art of eiffel tower < loop set to 5 that means opus will tell MiniMax (official) to make it better 5 times >

Chetaslua

82,988 次观看 • 6 个月前

Introducing Agent Mode: Agentic AI is now measured in the Arena. Agent Mode can do deep research, create reports, generate images, build websites, debug code, and more. It completes more complex tasks by using tools like web search, bash in a sandbox environment, image generation, file writing, and asking follow-up questions. Frontier models are waiting for you in Agent Mode to take on real-world tasks. GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and top open models. Test them yourself.

Introducing Agent Mode: Agentic AI is now measured in the Arena. Agent Mode can do deep research, create reports, generate images, build websites, debug code, and more. It completes more complex tasks by using tools like web search, bash in a sandbox environment, image generation, file writing, and asking follow-up questions. Frontier models are waiting for you in Agent Mode to take on real-world tasks. GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and top open models. Test them yourself.

Arena.ai

525,537 次观看 • 3 个月前

Opus 5 is 3d beast On my Opus i swear i have never seen this level of detail in one shot ever in my life even multiple shots cant produce this , i am shaking with this out holy opus , btw its token hungry in 3 prompt ate entire usage even fable 5 is not that token hungry

Opus 5 is 3d beast On my Opus i swear i have never seen this level of detail in one shot ever in my life even multiple shots cant produce this , i am shaking with this out holy opus , btw its token hungry in 3 prompt ate entire usage even fable 5 is not that token hungry

Chetaslua

673,794 次观看 • 2 个月前

Claude opus 5.5 ultracode edition i gave the fable output to opus said to make a launch video for itself where it helps people Claude ClaudeDevs Boris Cherny this is what claude is born to do helping people with their daily work you can play with it :

Claude opus 5.5 ultracode edition i gave the fable output to opus said to make a launch video for itself where it helps people Claude ClaudeDevs Boris Cherny this is what claude is born to do helping people with their daily work you can play with it :

Chetaslua

36,214 次观看 • 5 天前

Gemini 3.5 Pro vs Grok 4.6 Please read entire post before coming to conclusion :) Both are present in arena first of all let me clear i really want that google cook great comeback but this model is disaster it make stuff that you didnot asked for , have crappy ui guys at this point we have grok with better ui compared to gemini > gemini was good in webdev now its bad > gemini 2.5 DT was good in 3d now its bad > gemini was less restrictive and prompt following in 2.5 pro was so good , now its corporate slop with template , at this time you will feel that there is template for coding , writing and researching all sucks I will write a long review if you guys want that , this is first time i am writing long tweet , i will now follow this for every big release

Gemini 3.5 Pro vs Grok 4.6 Please read entire post before coming to conclusion :) Both are present in arena first of all let me clear i really want that google cook great comeback but this model is disaster it make stuff that you didnot asked for , have crappy ui guys at this point we have grok with better ui compared to gemini > gemini was good in webdev now its bad > gemini 2.5 DT was good in 3d now its bad > gemini was less restrictive and prompt following in 2.5 pro was so good , now its corporate slop with template , at this time you will feel that there is template for coding , writing and researching all sucks I will write a long review if you guys want that , this is first time i am writing long tweet , i will now follow this for every big release

Chetaslua

39,085 次观看 • 1 个月前