正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Bill Gates just dropped a bombshell memo on climate change—completely reversing his doomsday rhetoric. For years, Gates, alongside figures like Al Gore, Greta Thunberg, and Barack Obama, warned of apocalyptic climate collapse: coral die-offs, mass extinction, and a planet ravaged by heatwaves and storms. He painted a future so...

31,175 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Jimmy Dore on Bill Gates’ Climate Change Complete Reversal After years of pushing doomsday climate alarmism, Bill Gates has flipped his stance in a major public reversal. On October 28th, Gates published a memo and spoke on CNBC, dismissing the "cataclysmic climate change" narrative he once supported. Now, he claims climate change "will not lead to humanity’s demise," and people will "live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future." This sharp turnaround contradicts Gates’ previous alarming calls warning humanity’s survival was at risk. He now argues that fears about rapid sea level rise, catastrophic hurricanes, and worsening fires were overstated. In fact, he highlights that increased atmospheric carbon has led to more greenery, not less, and that emission projections have declined. Gates urges refocusing efforts away from apocalyptic temperature targets like 1.5 or 2 degrees Celsius, which he says we won't meet, towards improving human welfare, especially in impoverished nations. He stresses the importance of balancing climate action with tackling poverty and disease, pointing out that developing countries have been stuck chasing expensive green solutions instead of affordable fossil fuels. Gates suggests we should prioritize measurable improvements like vaccines and poverty reduction over panicked climate alarmism, even if it means letting temperatures rise slightly. This shift comes amidst criticism of Gates for previous fear-mongering and calls for him to apologize to scientists censored for expressing more moderate views, to young people traumatized by climate dread, and to developing countries boxed in by net zero policies. Meanwhile, Jimmy Dore and others have highlighted this about-face as a validation of years of climate realism and skepticism towards the alarmist orthodoxy. It also fuels distrust in Gates, given his deep vaccine investments and history of public contradictions. In a nutshell, Bill Gates went from climate doomsayer to climate realist advocating a pragmatic approach that prioritizes human lives over chasing impossible temperature goals—a pivot sure to stir controversy, inspire debate, and make many reconsider the climate crisis narrative as we know it.

Camus

32,057 次观看 • 8 个月前

Bill Gates Finally Admits What We Knew All Along: Climate Hysteria Was Overblown" For years, Bill Gates was the ultimate climate alarmist—pushing net-zero fantasies, warning of apocalyptic warming, and pressuring governments and corporations to treat CO₂ like a global emergency. His foundation funneled billions into green tech, while his rhetoric fueled panic: 1.5°C or doom. But now, in a stunning memo, even Gates is walking it back. His new message? The “doomsday scenario” was exaggerated. The obsession with near-term emissions targets? A distraction. The idea that climate change is the single greatest threat to humanity? A misplaced priority. Gates is finally acknowledging what skeptics have said for years: The climate movement’s extreme focus on emissions has come at the cost of real human needs. While activists demanded trillions for unproven green schemes, poverty, disease, and energy access—actual, immediate crises—were sidelined. Now, with aid budgets collapsing, Gates is saying what should have been obvious: We can’t let climate dogma override common sense. He’s right. The Paris Accord’s 1.5°C target was always unrealistic—a political fantasy, not a scientific necessity. The net-zero pledges from corporations (including Microsoft) were performative, not practical. And the idea that the world’s poor should sacrifice development for Western climate guilt? A moral failure. Gates still believes in some climate action—but his shift is a tacit admission that the movement went too far. The real question: How many trillions were wasted on fearmongering before even a tech billionaire had to admit the emperor had no clothes? The climate industrial complex won’t like this. But the truth is undeniable: The panic was never about science. It was about control. And now, one of its biggest architects is quietly backing away.

Camus

28,356 次观看 • 8 个月前

Bill Gates’ Climate Flip: A Masterclass in Elite Hypocrisy For years, Bill Gates was the oracle of climate doom. His 2021 book, How to Avoid a Climate Disaster, painted a world on the brink—unless we embraced radical net-zero policies, geoengineering schemes (like spraying dust into the stratosphere), and the wholesale abandonment of fossil fuels. He warned of civilization’s collapse, funded alarmist research, and helped silence dissent as “climate denial.” Governments, banks, and institutions fell in line, cutting off funding for anything but “green” energy, while children were taught their future was a wasteland of fire and flood. Now? Gates sings a different tune. In a stunning reversal, he admits we won’t hit 1.5°C or even 2°C targets. Climate change, he now says, is serious but not existential—just a problem for the world’s poorest. Innovation, not degrowth, is the answer. Human welfare—vaccines, poverty reduction, adaptation—must take precedence over temperature targets. Energy use, he concedes, is good for human progress. The man who once pushed solar geoengineering as a last-ditch survival tactic now calls it a distraction. What changed? The monologue from Glenn Beck cuts to the heart of the matter: power, control, and a failed globalist agenda. Gates’ epiphany isn’t scientific—it’s political. His vision of top-down global governance, championed by the WEF and UN, is crumbling. Donald Trump’s rise dismantled the climate industrial complex’s grip on policy. The “useless eaters” (as elites allegedly see the masses) are no longer so easy to manage. With Trump dismantling the Paris Accord, defunding the WEF’s pet projects, and prioritizing energy abundance, Gates’ playbook is obsolete. This isn’t humility. It’s survival. Gates’ foundation bankrolled the fearmongering that demonized skeptics, stifled debate, and funneled trillions into unproven tech while real human needs—like vaccines and economic growth—were sidelined. Now, as AI and quantum computing demand more energy (not less), he pivots. Suddenly, fossil fuels aren’t the enemy. Suddenly, “climate deniers” (a term he helped weaponize) were right all along: you can’t save the planet by destroying humanity. But let’s be clear: this isn’t redemption. It’s a tactical retreat. The same elites who terrified a generation into believing the world would end by 2030 now shrug and say, “Well, maybe not.” No apology. No accountability. Just a smooth pivot to the next narrative—because the goal was never the climate. It was control. The question remains: Who decides your future? The technocrats who cried wolf for decades, or a world that rejects their steel cage of fear and scarcity? Gates doesn’t get a pass. Neither do the institutions that amplified his alarmism. The damage is done: careers ruined, economies weakened, children traumatized. If the science was ever settled, it’s settled now—the elites were wrong. And their sudden “reasonableness” is just another move in the game. Wake up. Stay angry. Demand better.

Camus

62,569 次观看 • 8 个月前

Banks Abandon Net Zero, The UN Shifts to Health, and Gates Leads the Charge—The Climate‑Vaccine Merger Is Here Bill Gates just quietly confirmed the pivot many suspected was coming. After years of pushing climate investment, he now says the real focus will shift toward “new vaccines” and “immunization.” And what’s happening around him? Every major signal suggests Big Business is following the same path. The Wall Street Journal reports major banks like JPMorgan, Citibank, and UBS are backing away from their net-zero pledges. The Financial Times says companies by the hundreds are abandoning their climate targets altogether. The Net Zero Banking Alliance has suspended operations amid a wave of exits. The corporate world is quietly leaving the green agenda—and the next global narrative is being loaded. Enter the Lancet, which recently published “Climate Change and Pandemics: A Call to Action,” arguing that climate disruptions helped cause outbreaks like Wuhan and insisting that climate policy must now integrate global health. And conveniently, COP30—this year’s UN Climate Action Conference in Brazil—isn’t focused on the atmosphere anymore. It’s about “integrating health into climate resilience,” complete with new programs for immunization, surveillance, and disease control. Translation: they’re merging climate finance with public health to channel billions into the same old institutions—this time under the banner of “resilience.” Bill Gates, always one step ahead of the curve, is just vocalizing what the system already decided: global control will now pivot from the sky to the bloodstream. Environmental fear has been replaced with biological fear—the perfect new tool of compliance. Because when climate alarm stopped selling, health became the new climate.

Camus

56,683 次观看 • 8 个月前

Since taking office, President Donald Trump has pulled the US out of the United Nations Paris agreement on climate change, unleashed fossil fuel production, cut climate subsidies that were part of the Inflation Reduction Act, and chosen as his Secretary of Energy an oilman who helped create the fracking revolution. Given that Democrats have spent the last 20 years describing climate change as an “existential threat” and making climate policy their highest priority under Biden, one would expect there to be significant protests and other actions by progressives. And yet we’ve seen no significant climate change protests since Trump took office two months ago. No Greta Thunberg marches — she’s moved on to Palestine. No drumbeat from the news media. No Extinction Rebellion activists blocking traffic in DC. “Climate emergency” was not among the words chosen by Democrats in Congress to put on the little placards they held up during Trump’s address to Congress earlier this month. In fact, to the extent there have been protests by Democrats, they have been against the world’s most pioneering electric car manufacturer, Tesla, and have nothing to do with climate change. It’s true that many Democrats still care deeply about climate change and the issue may come back in the future. Where just 23% of Republicans view climate change as a serious threat to the country, 78% of Democrats do. “Executive orders are for show,” says political scientist and climate policy expert, The Honest Broker , on a new podcast for Public, “legislation is for real. And there doesn't seem to be any legislative strategy accompanying anything Trump is doing. As far as pulling out of Paris, we've done this dance before. Trump pulled out to Paris, and then Biden went back in.” And the media and Democrats routinely tie every natural disaster, such as the recent fires in LA, to climate change, even though there’s no good science supporting such connections, in most instances. “Every day there's some extreme weather somewhere,” said Pielke, who is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, “and so it is a perfectly made issue for sustaining some degree of attention.” But the partisan polarization over climate change, and the ease with which Trump and Biden can put the US in and out of the Paris agreement, all underscore the overall low level of concern with climate change in comparison to more pressing issues like inflation, migration, and even seemingly fringe issues like transgenderism. “The climate movement is a product of North America and Northern Europe,” said Pielke. “The ‘climate first’ voter is a tiny slice of the political landscape, even though they occupy a lot of attention and time on social media, in universities, and until recently, in the global financial sector. They made a lot of noise, but there weren't a lot of them around to begin with. The climate is just not that important to very many people around the world. People will say it's important. But give them a list of topics and it routinely comes in 17th, 18th, 19th, out of 20.” And now Pielke predicts that climate change could go the way of past environmental scares. “One story for the future of the climate discourse and climate change is that it's not going to go away, but it's going to fade from the center of public view like overpopulation did.” Why did climate change emerge as an issue of concern and then fade? “There's a pretty well-known economist named Anthony Downs who wrote a famous paper called the Issue Attention Cycle,” said Pielke. “It’s like a bell curve. You discover there's a potential problem, there's a lot of excitement, and ‘We’ve got to do something about it!’ Everybody gets on the bandwagon. Then you realize, ‘Oh my gosh, this is difficult! This is challenging!’ And then your attention goes to somewhere else and it's back down. And really climate change is following the Downs’ Issue Attention Cycle perfectly.” Pielke notes that the rate at which economies decarbonize, or reduce the amount of carbon dioxide per unit of GDP, is unchanged. “For the foreseeable future, we will continue to decarbonize the economy no matter what countries say about their climate commitments or whether there's a Viktor Orban or a Donald Trump in office. Decarbonization is much more powerful, it seems, than the politics of the climate. The Paris agreement hasn't really done anything to alter the trajectory of global decarbonization….Climate policy does a lot of things, but reducing carbon dioxide emissions is not one of those things...” Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and listen to the full podcast!

Michael Shellenberger

51,140 次观看 • 1 年前