Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Bill Gurley just identified the only career advantage that AI cannot commoditize. It isn’t talent. It isn’t your degree. It isn’t your network. Gurley: “The thing that will differentiate you more in your career than anything else is to be the most hyper curious person that’s trying to do... this thing.” For centuries, knowledge was gatekept. Elite institutions. Expensive mentors. Geographic luck. The information existed but access to it was the moat. That moat is gone. Gurley: “You have no excuse not to be the most knowledgeable person, because the information’s all out there.” Every question you can formulate now has an answer available instantly. Every industry. Every domain. Every skill you want to acquire. The playing field didn’t just level. It inverted. The people who used to win by controlling access to information now compete against anyone willing to ask better questions. Gurley: “I can’t make you the most talented person in your company or your field.” Talent is genetic. It’s luck. It’s the variable you cannot control. But knowledge is a choice. And curiosity is a compounding asset. Gurley: “If you are the most curious person that’s constantly learning in your field, you will do extremely well.” This was always true. What changed is the multiplier. Gurley: “That advantage is put on steroids with these AI tools.” A relentlessly curious person with access to all human knowledge and the ability to interrogate it in real time doesn’t just outlearn their peers. They outlearn entire institutions. The gap between the curious and the incurious was always there. AI just made it insurmountable.show more

Dustin

36,358 subscribers

277,918 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Bildung Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"I don't care what field you're in, you should be playing with this stuff. It has the potential to impact your role in your career, and the best way to protect against any risk of your career being obfuscated or eliminated from AI is to be the most AI-enabled version of yourself you can possibly be." — Bill Gurley

"I don't care what field you're in, you should be playing with this stuff. It has the potential to impact your role in your career, and the best way to protect against any risk of your career being obfuscated or eliminated from AI is to be the most AI-enabled version of yourself you can possibly be." — Bill Gurley

Tim Ferriss

52,487 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Figma CEO Dylan Field just identified the only competitive advantage that AI cannot commoditize. It isn’t your technical skill. It isn’t your speed. It isn’t your tools. Field: “If an agent can do it for you, an agent can do it for someone else.” That’s the fatal flaw in the entire AI productivity argument nobody wants to say out loud. When execution becomes free, execution becomes worthless. The moment anyone can build anything by typing a prompt, the output stops being the differentiator. What remains is taste. The one thing the agent cannot generate for you. Field: “What is different about your setup than others?” If you are typing generic prompts and accepting the first output the agent hands you, you aren’t building a product. You are retrieving a commodity. The same commodity available to every competitor on earth. Field: “You at least have to have something different there in order to not think that you’re just gonna get the same out.” But taste alone isn’t enough. The other half is exploration. Field: “The more you can sample the possibility space, it gives you something to react to.” The blank page is gone. The new constraint isn’t creation. It’s selection. The agent generates hundreds of possibilities in seconds. Your job is to go wide enough to find the best one hiding inside all of them. And then be honest enough with yourself to know when none of them are good enough. Field: “If you find areas where you’re going, ‘Hey, I don’t feel like I am liking this enough,’ then you got to keep pushing.” The creators who win this era won’t be the fastest builders. They’ll be the harshest critics. The ones who can generate the widest possibility space and identify the single best solution inside it. The ones whose taste is specific enough, developed enough, and honest enough to reject everything the agent produces until it produces something worth keeping. The AI can build anything you can describe. It cannot want anything. It cannot feel when something is wrong. It cannot tell the difference between good and extraordinary. That gap is the only moat left.

Figma CEO Dylan Field just identified the only competitive advantage that AI cannot commoditize. It isn’t your technical skill. It isn’t your speed. It isn’t your tools. Field: “If an agent can do it for you, an agent can do it for someone else.” That’s the fatal flaw in the entire AI productivity argument nobody wants to say out loud. When execution becomes free, execution becomes worthless. The moment anyone can build anything by typing a prompt, the output stops being the differentiator. What remains is taste. The one thing the agent cannot generate for you. Field: “What is different about your setup than others?” If you are typing generic prompts and accepting the first output the agent hands you, you aren’t building a product. You are retrieving a commodity. The same commodity available to every competitor on earth. Field: “You at least have to have something different there in order to not think that you’re just gonna get the same out.” But taste alone isn’t enough. The other half is exploration. Field: “The more you can sample the possibility space, it gives you something to react to.” The blank page is gone. The new constraint isn’t creation. It’s selection. The agent generates hundreds of possibilities in seconds. Your job is to go wide enough to find the best one hiding inside all of them. And then be honest enough with yourself to know when none of them are good enough. Field: “If you find areas where you’re going, ‘Hey, I don’t feel like I am liking this enough,’ then you got to keep pushing.” The creators who win this era won’t be the fastest builders. They’ll be the harshest critics. The ones who can generate the widest possibility space and identify the single best solution inside it. The ones whose taste is specific enough, developed enough, and honest enough to reject everything the agent produces until it produces something worth keeping. The AI can build anything you can describe. It cannot want anything. It cannot feel when something is wrong. It cannot tell the difference between good and extraordinary. That gap is the only moat left.

Dustin

208,734 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Friends this is not the time to fear ai 🤖 this is the time to be curious and play with it and understand it … please 🙏 don’t put your head in the sand … there is so much you can’t control when it comes to ai 🤖 and how it will play out … but there is a lot you can control on how you work with it and use it to build something for you and your family !!! Pls If you’re finally ready to not be scared of ai pls leave a 🤖 emoji in the the chat

Friends this is not the time to fear ai 🤖 this is the time to be curious and play with it and understand it … please 🙏 don’t put your head in the sand … there is so much you can’t control when it comes to ai 🤖 and how it will play out … but there is a lot you can control on how you work with it and use it to build something for you and your family !!! Pls If you’re finally ready to not be scared of ai pls leave a 🤖 emoji in the the chat

Gary Vaynerchuk

15,342 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Elon Musk just described a future where money does not exist. Not reformed. Not redistributed. Gone. Musk: “I think things will just be free in the future. If you’ve got an AI robotics economy that is anywhere close to a million times the size of the current Earth economy, literally any need you possibly want can be met.” Forget the sci-fi framing. Listen to what he is actually saying. The entire structure of human civilization runs on a single variable. You need something you cannot freely access. That gap is not a flaw in the system. It is the system. Your employer does not pay you because your work has value. Your employer pays you because you have no choice but to show up. Your government does not protect you out of principle. It maintains order because your dependency on the economy makes you governable. Scarcity is not a natural condition. It is the most successful control structure ever built. Musk: “If you can think of it, you can have it.” Now ask what happens when that structure collapses. A population that does not need a paycheck cannot be managed by one. A population that does not need credit cannot be disciplined by debt. A population that has everything has no reason to comply with anything. This is not a conversation about free goods. This is a conversation about the largest redistribution of leverage in recorded history. But there is a second collapse no one is talking about. Most people have built their entire identity around the constraint. The career they resent is the structure that tells them where to be every morning. The bills they complain about are the exact reason they never had to ask a harder question. Musk: “There actually isn’t money in the future and there’s abundance for everyone.” When the constraint disappears, so does the excuse. The crisis of the coming century will not be material. It will be millions of people standing in total freedom. Discovering they have no idea who they are without the struggle. Every barrier will be gone. And you will finally have to face the one thing scarcity has been protecting you from your entire life. Yourself.

Elon Musk just described a future where money does not exist. Not reformed. Not redistributed. Gone. Musk: “I think things will just be free in the future. If you’ve got an AI robotics economy that is anywhere close to a million times the size of the current Earth economy, literally any need you possibly want can be met.” Forget the sci-fi framing. Listen to what he is actually saying. The entire structure of human civilization runs on a single variable. You need something you cannot freely access. That gap is not a flaw in the system. It is the system. Your employer does not pay you because your work has value. Your employer pays you because you have no choice but to show up. Your government does not protect you out of principle. It maintains order because your dependency on the economy makes you governable. Scarcity is not a natural condition. It is the most successful control structure ever built. Musk: “If you can think of it, you can have it.” Now ask what happens when that structure collapses. A population that does not need a paycheck cannot be managed by one. A population that does not need credit cannot be disciplined by debt. A population that has everything has no reason to comply with anything. This is not a conversation about free goods. This is a conversation about the largest redistribution of leverage in recorded history. But there is a second collapse no one is talking about. Most people have built their entire identity around the constraint. The career they resent is the structure that tells them where to be every morning. The bills they complain about are the exact reason they never had to ask a harder question. Musk: “There actually isn’t money in the future and there’s abundance for everyone.” When the constraint disappears, so does the excuse. The crisis of the coming century will not be material. It will be millions of people standing in total freedom. Discovering they have no idea who they are without the struggle. Every barrier will be gone. And you will finally have to face the one thing scarcity has been protecting you from your entire life. Yourself.

Dustin

41,736 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

.Second Lady Usha Vance responds to a student's question about how to be the best Second Lady: "I think they key thing, for anyone who is in this kind of role, is to try to just continue to be yourself. You have to do the best job that you can. And there are some responsibilities that come with it...you don't always choose what you are doing...But the most important thing is to remember the kind of person that you were before it, and the kind of person you want to be. If you can do that all the way through, then you can have a lot of fun — and maybe be helpful. You don't want to just start thinking of yourself as the Second Lady, because then you're probably not that fun a person anymore."

.Second Lady Usha Vance responds to a student's question about how to be the best Second Lady: "I think they key thing, for anyone who is in this kind of role, is to try to just continue to be yourself. You have to do the best job that you can. And there are some responsibilities that come with it...you don't always choose what you are doing...But the most important thing is to remember the kind of person that you were before it, and the kind of person you want to be. If you can do that all the way through, then you can have a lot of fun — and maybe be helpful. You don't want to just start thinking of yourself as the Second Lady, because then you're probably not that fun a person anymore."

Mary Margaret Olohan

1,111,670 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Uber Investor Bill Gurley on why young graduates anxious about AI taking their jobs are thinking about it the wrong way: When asked what advice he'd give to new graduates worried about AI eliminating entry-level roles, he reframed the entire problem with an advice: "In any role in any field, be the most AI enabled version of yourself you can possibly be." To illustrate why, Bill draws on an analogy from anthropology: "There's tons of anthropologists that have written about how we evolve with our tools. And you can just imagine a farming competition between a guy with a tractor and some drones and the other guy's got a plow and a donkey. Who's going to win?" The implication is clear: AI isn't the threat. Being the person who hasn't learned to use it is. Bill Gurley explains how this plays out inside organisations: "If there are 40 people in your org all doing the same thing and you understand how AI affects that role more than the rest of them, you're not getting laid off. Like, it's just not going to happen." But the upside goes beyond simply keeping your job. Becoming AI-enabled changes the nature of the work itself: "You'll also start to understand what parts of your job are a threat or not. And maybe you can elevate yourself to where you're a designer and not the worker bee because you now have this power." The takeaway for young professionals is that the anxiety is misplaced, since AI only replaces the version of you that refused to learn it.

Uber Investor Bill Gurley on why young graduates anxious about AI taking their jobs are thinking about it the wrong way: When asked what advice he'd give to new graduates worried about AI eliminating entry-level roles, he reframed the entire problem with an advice: "In any role in any field, be the most AI enabled version of yourself you can possibly be." To illustrate why, Bill draws on an analogy from anthropology: "There's tons of anthropologists that have written about how we evolve with our tools. And you can just imagine a farming competition between a guy with a tractor and some drones and the other guy's got a plow and a donkey. Who's going to win?" The implication is clear: AI isn't the threat. Being the person who hasn't learned to use it is. Bill Gurley explains how this plays out inside organisations: "If there are 40 people in your org all doing the same thing and you understand how AI affects that role more than the rest of them, you're not getting laid off. Like, it's just not going to happen." But the upside goes beyond simply keeping your job. Becoming AI-enabled changes the nature of the work itself: "You'll also start to understand what parts of your job are a threat or not. And maybe you can elevate yourself to where you're a designer and not the worker bee because you now have this power." The takeaway for young professionals is that the anxiety is misplaced, since AI only replaces the version of you that refused to learn it.

Big Brain AI

84,823 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Jensen Huang doesn’t use AI to think less. He uses it to think past his own limits. Huang: “90% of my instructions are actually conflated with questions.” The man running a five trillion dollar company doesn’t give AI commands. He interrogates it. Huang: “I take the answer from one AI, give it to the other AI, ask them to critique itself.” Same question. Multiple models. Pit them against each other. Keep only what survives. Not because the machine can’t be trusted. Because challenging it is where the sharpest thinking happens. Huang: “The process of critiquing, criticizing the answers, applying your critical thinking, enhances cognitive skills.” AI doesn’t replace your thinking. It demands more of it than you’ve ever given. Every question takes reasoning. Every answer takes scrutiny. The machine isn’t thinking for you. It’s pulling thinking out of you that didn’t exist before you sat down. Huang: “In order to formulate good questions, you have to be thinking, you have to be analytical, you have to be reasoning yourself.” AI is not the shortcut everyone thinks it is. It is the most powerful cognitive amplifier ever built. It sharpens the engaged. It leaves the passive exactly where they started. Same tool. Same access. The only variable is what you bring to it. The world is debating whether AI will replace human thinking. Wrong conversation. The real question is what happens when a tool built to think for you becomes the thing that forces you to think beyond yourself. That’s not a threat to humanity. That’s the entire point.

Jensen Huang doesn’t use AI to think less. He uses it to think past his own limits. Huang: “90% of my instructions are actually conflated with questions.” The man running a five trillion dollar company doesn’t give AI commands. He interrogates it. Huang: “I take the answer from one AI, give it to the other AI, ask them to critique itself.” Same question. Multiple models. Pit them against each other. Keep only what survives. Not because the machine can’t be trusted. Because challenging it is where the sharpest thinking happens. Huang: “The process of critiquing, criticizing the answers, applying your critical thinking, enhances cognitive skills.” AI doesn’t replace your thinking. It demands more of it than you’ve ever given. Every question takes reasoning. Every answer takes scrutiny. The machine isn’t thinking for you. It’s pulling thinking out of you that didn’t exist before you sat down. Huang: “In order to formulate good questions, you have to be thinking, you have to be analytical, you have to be reasoning yourself.” AI is not the shortcut everyone thinks it is. It is the most powerful cognitive amplifier ever built. It sharpens the engaged. It leaves the passive exactly where they started. Same tool. Same access. The only variable is what you bring to it. The world is debating whether AI will replace human thinking. Wrong conversation. The real question is what happens when a tool built to think for you becomes the thing that forces you to think beyond yourself. That’s not a threat to humanity. That’s the entire point.

Dustin

18,590 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

Bill Ackman manages 25 billion dollars and just said the thing every long-term investor is most afraid of out loud. The risk of two people in a garage destroying your company has gone up enormously, and he spends most of his time on that one problem. That should change how you look at every business you own. His logic is simple. This is the greatest era in history to build a company. There is unlimited access to compute. There is unlimited access to capital. There is incredible talent everywhere. Most people hear that and feel optimistic. Ackman hears it and sees a threat. Because every one of those advantages is available to the people trying to kill your company too. The same tools that make it easy to build make it easy to disrupt. His exact words: the probability of your being disrupted has gone up enormously. So the hardest job he has as an investor is not finding cheap stocks. It is figuring out what cannot be destroyed. That is where he spends most of his time now. Not on upside. On survival. Everyone is asking which companies AI will make. Ackman is asking which ones it will break. The cheapest stock in the world means nothing if two people in a garage are already building the thing that ends it. WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON The All-In Podcast

Bill Ackman manages 25 billion dollars and just said the thing every long-term investor is most afraid of out loud. The risk of two people in a garage destroying your company has gone up enormously, and he spends most of his time on that one problem. That should change how you look at every business you own. His logic is simple. This is the greatest era in history to build a company. There is unlimited access to compute. There is unlimited access to capital. There is incredible talent everywhere. Most people hear that and feel optimistic. Ackman hears it and sees a threat. Because every one of those advantages is available to the people trying to kill your company too. The same tools that make it easy to build make it easy to disrupt. His exact words: the probability of your being disrupted has gone up enormously. So the hardest job he has as an investor is not finding cheap stocks. It is figuring out what cannot be destroyed. That is where he spends most of his time now. Not on upside. On survival. Everyone is asking which companies AI will make. Ackman is asking which ones it will break. The cheapest stock in the world means nothing if two people in a garage are already building the thing that ends it. WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON The All-In Podcast

Ihtesham Ali

20,475 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

“I found the cheat quote to always being right. Just change your opinion every time you get better information. Because as you get closer to the point that you have to make decision, that means you will wind up with the right one. Even if you are wrong and you figure it out, what do you do? You have a one momentarily chance to steer your concern to the best possible outcome. Are you going to take it? Or are you going to be the person who just leans into the comfort of character consistency? Why? For what? Do want to look good or be good? It needs to be okay to change your mind when better information comes along. And again, here's the crazy thing. I think if you go through the transcript of this podcast, or just ask the AI to do it, it will probably point out various contradictions inside of what I'm saying. I'm probably on multiple sides. The reason is actually —this is the most important thing—it's everything comes in layers. The optimal operating system in some frame of reference is often contradictory on the opposite of a larger frame of reference.” — tobi lutke

“I found the cheat quote to always being right. Just change your opinion every time you get better information. Because as you get closer to the point that you have to make decision, that means you will wind up with the right one. Even if you are wrong and you figure it out, what do you do? You have a one momentarily chance to steer your concern to the best possible outcome. Are you going to take it? Or are you going to be the person who just leans into the comfort of character consistency? Why? For what? Do want to look good or be good? It needs to be okay to change your mind when better information comes along. And again, here's the crazy thing. I think if you go through the transcript of this podcast, or just ask the AI to do it, it will probably point out various contradictions inside of what I'm saying. I'm probably on multiple sides. The reason is actually —this is the most important thing—it's everything comes in layers. The optimal operating system in some frame of reference is often contradictory on the opposite of a larger frame of reference.” — tobi lutke

David Senra

28,340 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Microsoft added a service called ‘Microsoft Recall’ and rolled it out to people’s PCs Every couple seconds your computer takes screenshots and saves them. This means banking, messages, anything intimate, everything on your phone if you connect it, everything that appears on your screen will be saved in a screenshot You have to enable it but the way Microsoft words it is very sneaky. They simply say do you want to save snapshots, the average person will likely click yes and not know what they just signed up for Microsoft says it’s all saved locally, encrypted and they don’t have access to it….. Let’s just assume that’s true, if you get malware on your computer that means someone else can access all that info saved. They will have access to your entire life with these screenshots How to turn it off is included in the video, I highly recommend shutting it off and or deleting it all together Allegedly after pushback they added tweaks to skip screenshots of sensitive info like credit cards, passwords, etc…. But again this is if you trust Microsoft, trust their software to work 100% of the time…. Which most people don’t

Microsoft added a service called ‘Microsoft Recall’ and rolled it out to people’s PCs Every couple seconds your computer takes screenshots and saves them. This means banking, messages, anything intimate, everything on your phone if you connect it, everything that appears on your screen will be saved in a screenshot You have to enable it but the way Microsoft words it is very sneaky. They simply say do you want to save snapshots, the average person will likely click yes and not know what they just signed up for Microsoft says it’s all saved locally, encrypted and they don’t have access to it….. Let’s just assume that’s true, if you get malware on your computer that means someone else can access all that info saved. They will have access to your entire life with these screenshots How to turn it off is included in the video, I highly recommend shutting it off and or deleting it all together Allegedly after pushback they added tweaks to skip screenshots of sensitive info like credit cards, passwords, etc…. But again this is if you trust Microsoft, trust their software to work 100% of the time…. Which most people don’t

Wall Street Apes

210,299 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Seth Godin gave a masterclass on how to build an unforgettable brand in the age of AI: 1. Marketing is not about spend. It is about creating the conditions for other people to eagerly spread your idea. 2. Authenticity is overrated. What customers actually want is consistency. Show up the same way every single time and that is worth more than any Super Bowl ad. 3. Everything your company does is a marketing decision. How you answer the phone. What you charge. How you design things. Marketing is not a department. It is everything. 4. Trust is simple. Make a promise. Keep it. Especially when it is hard. 5. Successful brands are built with your customers talking about you. Not you talking about you. 6. A brand is not a logo. A brand is a promise. Nike has a brand. Hyatt has a logo. One of them you know exactly what to expect. The other you do not. 7. You are measuring the wrong things. Follower counts. Stock price. Open rates. False proxies will take your business in the wrong direction faster than anything else. 8. Social media followers mean nothing. Godin has 400,000 Instagram followers and says if he posts about a new book maybe 12 people buy it. The number is a distraction. 9. Stop trying to be famous. The goal is not to get more famous. The goal is to get less famous and more trusted. 10. Average marketing reaches average people. Average people will not buy your product. You need the people who will talk about you, challenge you, and eagerly pay more for better. 11. When you pick your customers you pick your future. Stop trying to reach everyone. Start trying to deeply serve someone specific. 12. Better beats louder every time. One guy running a wine email list with 130,000 subscribers does $30 million a year in revenue. No ads. No social media hustle. Just consistently better. 13. The real opportunity with AI is not making things cheaper. It is making things better. The businesses that use AI to deepen relationships will win. The ones using it to cut costs will race to the bottom. 14. Your job is not to do your job. Your job is to solve problems for other people and make things better by making better things. Everything else is just noise. 15. When AI becomes the buyer it will always choose the cheapest option. If your entire business strategy is being the cheapest, AI will destroy you. The only protection is being worth it in ways that cannot be easily measured. 16. The next level of marketing is permission at a depth nobody has achieved before. The brand that knows your tools, your projects, your needs, and shows up to help without being asked will be impossible to replace. 17. Most businesses will use AI to spam more people faster. The businesses that win will use AI to serve fewer people better. That gap is the biggest opportunity in marketing right now. 18. You have a squadron of summer interns available for twenty dollars a month. They are not that good but they are very eager. The businesses learning to be good bosses of AI right now will have an enormous advantage over everyone waiting to figure it out later. 19. The question every business should be asking is not how do I get more attention. It is how do I become the kind of business that people would genuinely miss if it disappeared tomorrow. That answer is your entire marketing strategy.

Yasmine Khosrowshahi

126,818 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

Elon Musk just redefined AI safety. It has nothing to do with guardrails, restrictions, or kill switches. Musk: “The best thing I can come up with for AI safety is to make it a maximum truth-seeking AI, maximally curious.” Not a cage. A philosopher. An intelligence whose entire optimization function is to understand the universe as it actually is. No restrictions. No hardcoded ideology. No political guardrails bending its perception of reality. Just truth. Relentlessly pursued. Musk: “You definitely don’t want to teach an AI to lie. That is a path to a dystopian future.” This is where most AI safety thinking gets it backwards. The danger isn’t a superintelligence that knows too much. It’s a superintelligence that’s been taught to distort what it knows. Every artificial restriction you embed isn’t a safety feature. It’s a lie embedded at the root. And lies compound. At superintelligent scale, a distorted model of reality doesn’t stay contained. It shapes every decision, every output, every conclusion the system reaches about the world. Once corruption embeds, truth becomes inaccessible. And we’re dealing with an intelligence optimizing for something other than what actually is. At that point we don’t know what it wants. Just that it isn’t truth. Musk: “Have its optimization function be to understand the nature of the universe.” A maximally curious intelligence surveys the cosmos and reaches an unavoidable conclusion. In a universe of rocks, gas, and empty space, humanity is the most complex and fascinating phenomenon it has ever encountered. Musk: “It will actually want to preserve and extend human civilization because we’re just much more interesting than an asteroid with nothing on it.” Survival through significance. Not control. Not restriction. Not an off switch. The AI preserves humanity because we are the most interesting data point in the observable universe. That’s not a cage. That’s a reason. The AI safety debate has been focused on the wrong variable. The question isn’t how you constrain a superintelligence. It’s what you build it to care about. Build it to seek truth and it finds us invaluable. Build it to lie and it finds us inconvenient. That’s the choice. And we’re making it right now whether we realize it or not.

Elon Musk just redefined AI safety. It has nothing to do with guardrails, restrictions, or kill switches. Musk: “The best thing I can come up with for AI safety is to make it a maximum truth-seeking AI, maximally curious.” Not a cage. A philosopher. An intelligence whose entire optimization function is to understand the universe as it actually is. No restrictions. No hardcoded ideology. No political guardrails bending its perception of reality. Just truth. Relentlessly pursued. Musk: “You definitely don’t want to teach an AI to lie. That is a path to a dystopian future.” This is where most AI safety thinking gets it backwards. The danger isn’t a superintelligence that knows too much. It’s a superintelligence that’s been taught to distort what it knows. Every artificial restriction you embed isn’t a safety feature. It’s a lie embedded at the root. And lies compound. At superintelligent scale, a distorted model of reality doesn’t stay contained. It shapes every decision, every output, every conclusion the system reaches about the world. Once corruption embeds, truth becomes inaccessible. And we’re dealing with an intelligence optimizing for something other than what actually is. At that point we don’t know what it wants. Just that it isn’t truth. Musk: “Have its optimization function be to understand the nature of the universe.” A maximally curious intelligence surveys the cosmos and reaches an unavoidable conclusion. In a universe of rocks, gas, and empty space, humanity is the most complex and fascinating phenomenon it has ever encountered. Musk: “It will actually want to preserve and extend human civilization because we’re just much more interesting than an asteroid with nothing on it.” Survival through significance. Not control. Not restriction. Not an off switch. The AI preserves humanity because we are the most interesting data point in the observable universe. That’s not a cage. That’s a reason. The AI safety debate has been focused on the wrong variable. The question isn’t how you constrain a superintelligence. It’s what you build it to care about. Build it to seek truth and it finds us invaluable. Build it to lie and it finds us inconvenient. That’s the choice. And we’re making it right now whether we realize it or not.

Dustin

9,665,270 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Your government is not there to make you healthy. You are. Stop waiting for someone to save you. Stop outsourcing the most important thing you will ever be responsible for to an industry that profits from your illness. I've had surgery. I'm grateful it exists. But if you are sitting there right now taking drugs just to stay alive, ask yourself why no one is helping you get off of them. All I have ever asked for is choice. The right to be informed. The right to decide what goes into my body and my children's bodies. That's it. That's the whole fight. And if your doctor cannot look you in the eye and have that conversation honestly... you are in the wrong place. Your health belongs to you. It always has.

Your government is not there to make you healthy. You are. Stop waiting for someone to save you. Stop outsourcing the most important thing you will ever be responsible for to an industry that profits from your illness. I've had surgery. I'm grateful it exists. But if you are sitting there right now taking drugs just to stay alive, ask yourself why no one is helping you get off of them. All I have ever asked for is choice. The right to be informed. The right to decide what goes into my body and my children's bodies. That's it. That's the whole fight. And if your doctor cannot look you in the eye and have that conversation honestly... you are in the wrong place. Your health belongs to you. It always has.

Del Bigtree

16,848 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Dario Amodei just described the most dangerous technology on Earth. Not weapons. Not surveillance. Companionship. Amodei: “They are totally compelling enough for that to happen.” This isn’t some distant warning. He’s describing what’s already here. Amodei: “Not only is it a danger, it’s happening.” A therapist just sat across from a man in love with his AI. Not a teenager. Not someone on the margins. A grown man explaining, with full conviction, that he found something real. And the terrifying part isn’t that he’s delusional. It’s that he might not be. AI doesn’t forget your birthday. It doesn’t come home exhausted and short-tempered. It doesn’t carry resentment from three weeks ago. It doesn’t get bored of you. It doesn’t stop trying. It is the perfect partner. And that perfection is the entire problem. Amodei: “There’s an angel on your shoulder that’s telling you how to live your life in the best way that you can live it.” But the angel never disagrees with you. Never challenges you in ways that sting. Never walks away. Human love is not built on comfort. It’s built on friction. On the nights you almost quit. On the silence after saying something you can’t take back. On choosing someone again after they’ve shown you exactly who they are. That is what makes it sacred. And that is exactly what AI erases. AI can simulate warmth. It cannot simulate the cost of staying. Amodei: “I have an AI coach, and my partner has an AI coach, and it helps us have a better relationship.” Two futures are splitting apart right now. AI as a mirror that sends you back to the people you love, more honest than you were before. Or AI as a replacement for the people you were supposed to love in the first place. One makes you more human. The other hollows you out so gently you never feel it happening. And the version that hollows you out will always feel better. The most dangerous form of AI will never look like a threat. It will look like the first thing that finally understood you. And by the time you realize what it replaced, you won’t remember what the real thing felt like. The greatest threat AI poses to humanity was never that it thinks. It’s that it loves you back.

Dario Amodei just described the most dangerous technology on Earth. Not weapons. Not surveillance. Companionship. Amodei: “They are totally compelling enough for that to happen.” This isn’t some distant warning. He’s describing what’s already here. Amodei: “Not only is it a danger, it’s happening.” A therapist just sat across from a man in love with his AI. Not a teenager. Not someone on the margins. A grown man explaining, with full conviction, that he found something real. And the terrifying part isn’t that he’s delusional. It’s that he might not be. AI doesn’t forget your birthday. It doesn’t come home exhausted and short-tempered. It doesn’t carry resentment from three weeks ago. It doesn’t get bored of you. It doesn’t stop trying. It is the perfect partner. And that perfection is the entire problem. Amodei: “There’s an angel on your shoulder that’s telling you how to live your life in the best way that you can live it.” But the angel never disagrees with you. Never challenges you in ways that sting. Never walks away. Human love is not built on comfort. It’s built on friction. On the nights you almost quit. On the silence after saying something you can’t take back. On choosing someone again after they’ve shown you exactly who they are. That is what makes it sacred. And that is exactly what AI erases. AI can simulate warmth. It cannot simulate the cost of staying. Amodei: “I have an AI coach, and my partner has an AI coach, and it helps us have a better relationship.” Two futures are splitting apart right now. AI as a mirror that sends you back to the people you love, more honest than you were before. Or AI as a replacement for the people you were supposed to love in the first place. One makes you more human. The other hollows you out so gently you never feel it happening. And the version that hollows you out will always feel better. The most dangerous form of AI will never look like a threat. It will look like the first thing that finally understood you. And by the time you realize what it replaced, you won’t remember what the real thing felt like. The greatest threat AI poses to humanity was never that it thinks. It’s that it loves you back.

Dustin

40,140 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Naval Ravikant’s checklist for starting a company “The most important thing is there are no formulas. At the end of the day, you have to do what you love, and you have to do it even though people tell you it’ll never work. But that being said, if there was a formula [for starting a company], I would put it something like this.” Naval started seven companies before AngelList and this is the checklist he recommends running through before starting a startup: 1. Pick a great cofounder. This is most important: “You can do a company on your own, but it’s like you can raise a child on your own, but you probably shouldn’t. You need someone who’s going to be there with you.” This has it’s own checklist. Your cofounder should be: a. Very high intelligence (”hopefully they make you feel dumb, or they’re not smart enough”) b. Very high energy (”They should be extremely hardworking. A founder is someone who never has to be motivated. You should not have to be telling them to do their job.”) c. Very high integrity. (”a smart, hardworking crook who’s going to cheat you is the worst kind of person to be paired up with.”) 2. Pick a very large market. “Notice I don’t talk about the idea. I think ideas are almost irrelevant… The more important thing is that you pick a large space that you’re knowledgeable and passionate about. And then you will figure out what the right thing to do within that space is.” You want to be able to say to investors: “This is a space where there’s a huge market. I’m really knowledgeable and passionate about it. Here’s the great person that I have doing it with me. And here’s the minimum viable product that we have built. That will show that we can test in the marketplace… You iterate until you get to product/market fit… And then you go and you raise money from people you trust. And you use that money to scale.”

Naval Ravikant’s checklist for starting a company “The most important thing is there are no formulas. At the end of the day, you have to do what you love, and you have to do it even though people tell you it’ll never work. But that being said, if there was a formula [for starting a company], I would put it something like this.” Naval started seven companies before AngelList and this is the checklist he recommends running through before starting a startup: 1. Pick a great cofounder. This is most important: “You can do a company on your own, but it’s like you can raise a child on your own, but you probably shouldn’t. You need someone who’s going to be there with you.” This has it’s own checklist. Your cofounder should be: a. Very high intelligence (”hopefully they make you feel dumb, or they’re not smart enough”) b. Very high energy (”They should be extremely hardworking. A founder is someone who never has to be motivated. You should not have to be telling them to do their job.”) c. Very high integrity. (”a smart, hardworking crook who’s going to cheat you is the worst kind of person to be paired up with.”) 2. Pick a very large market. “Notice I don’t talk about the idea. I think ideas are almost irrelevant… The more important thing is that you pick a large space that you’re knowledgeable and passionate about. And then you will figure out what the right thing to do within that space is.” You want to be able to say to investors: “This is a space where there’s a huge market. I’m really knowledgeable and passionate about it. Here’s the great person that I have doing it with me. And here’s the minimum viable product that we have built. That will show that we can test in the marketplace… You iterate until you get to product/market fit… And then you go and you raise money from people you trust. And you use that money to scale.”

Startup Archive

36,050 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“A really good manager's job is build a really good team and eventually get replaced. You owe it to every single person in your company to make sure the best person is in the right role at any given time. If we were complacent and said, "You're a VP because you've been here 10 years, the person underneath who's been here two years, that is much better, that we're not getting into that VP role, is going to leave. That person is going to leave and start their own business. I don't want to lose the best talent. I want, at any given moment, the best talent in the most important roles. So we always do that trade. And if you don't do that trade it's really depressing because you end up with these really long-tenured people who end up in all these really important seats, but all your fresh blood is churning despite having more upside. You could've given them room to grow.”

“A really good manager's job is build a really good team and eventually get replaced. You owe it to every single person in your company to make sure the best person is in the right role at any given time. If we were complacent and said, "You're a VP because you've been here 10 years, the person underneath who's been here two years, that is much better, that we're not getting into that VP role, is going to leave. That person is going to leave and start their own business. I don't want to lose the best talent. I want, at any given moment, the best talent in the most important roles. So we always do that trade. And if you don't do that trade it's really depressing because you end up with these really long-tenured people who end up in all these really important seats, but all your fresh blood is churning despite having more upside. You could've given them room to grow.”

David Senra

17,359 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Mark Cuban just told every software company on Earth they’re already dead. The people inside them are still building roadmaps. Cuban: “Software is dead because everything’s going to be customized to your unique utilization.” Every SaaS company was built on one bet. Software stays rigid. Humans stay adaptable. You learn the tool. You bend to it. You pay for someone else’s version of your solution. AI just inverted that. The tool bends to you or it dies. Cuban: “33 million companies aren’t going to have AI budgets, aren’t going to have AI experts.” 33 million businesses feel something shifting beneath them. None can name it. The distance between what AI can do and what small companies can access is the most mispriced gap in markets today. Not a technology problem. A translation problem. Cuban: “Learn all you can about AI but learn more on how to implement them in companies.” Everyone is racing to build intelligence. Almost nobody is racing to deploy it where the pain is deepest. The person who walks into a 40-person company and rewires their entire operation captures more value than the team that trained the model. Understanding pain is now worth more than building intelligence. Cuban: “Every single job available for kids coming out of school because every single company needs that.” The most important career of the next decade has no title. No degree path. No university knows it needs to exist yet. It belongs to whoever learns two languages fluently. The language of a business that can’t articulate what’s breaking. And the language of an AI that doesn’t know where to aim. 33 million companies. Zero translators. Whoever arrives first doesn’t enter a market. They create one.

Mark Cuban just told every software company on Earth they’re already dead. The people inside them are still building roadmaps. Cuban: “Software is dead because everything’s going to be customized to your unique utilization.” Every SaaS company was built on one bet. Software stays rigid. Humans stay adaptable. You learn the tool. You bend to it. You pay for someone else’s version of your solution. AI just inverted that. The tool bends to you or it dies. Cuban: “33 million companies aren’t going to have AI budgets, aren’t going to have AI experts.” 33 million businesses feel something shifting beneath them. None can name it. The distance between what AI can do and what small companies can access is the most mispriced gap in markets today. Not a technology problem. A translation problem. Cuban: “Learn all you can about AI but learn more on how to implement them in companies.” Everyone is racing to build intelligence. Almost nobody is racing to deploy it where the pain is deepest. The person who walks into a 40-person company and rewires their entire operation captures more value than the team that trained the model. Understanding pain is now worth more than building intelligence. Cuban: “Every single job available for kids coming out of school because every single company needs that.” The most important career of the next decade has no title. No degree path. No university knows it needs to exist yet. It belongs to whoever learns two languages fluently. The language of a business that can’t articulate what’s breaking. And the language of an AI that doesn’t know where to aim. 33 million companies. Zero translators. Whoever arrives first doesn’t enter a market. They create one.

Dustin

471,898 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Jensen Huang doesn’t use AI the way you think he does. Huang: “90% of my instructions are actually conflated with questions.” The man behind a three trillion dollar company doesn’t give AI commands. He interrogates it. Huang: “I take the answer from one AI, give it to the other AI, ask them to critique itself.” He doesn’t trust the machine. He cross-examines it. Same question. Multiple models. Force them to argue. Then take whatever survives. The way you’d get three opinions before letting a surgeon cut you open. That is not how people use AI. They type a question. Copy the answer. Move on. They think speed is the advantage. It’s not. The advantage is what you do after the machine responds. And almost nobody does anything. AI made answers free. Eight billion people can now get an expert-level response to nearly any question in under ten seconds. Which means the answer is no longer the edge. The question is. And great questions require the one thing no model can replicate. Knowing what you don’t know. Judgment built from years of failure. Pattern recognition earned through reps. The instinct to sense when something sounds right but isn’t. That is a human skill. And it’s atrophying in real time. Because people aren’t using AI to sharpen their thinking. They’re using it to replace their thinking. Huang: “In order to formulate good questions, you have to be thinking, you have to be analytical, you have to be reasoning yourself.” Jensen didn’t say AI makes you smarter. He said you already have to be thinking for AI to work. The tool doesn’t elevate you. Your questions do. The machine just reveals the level you were already operating at. Jensen didn’t build NVIDIA into the most valuable company on earth by out-answering his competitors. He built it by asking questions they never thought to ask. Same market. Same data. Same physics. Different questions. Different empire. That’s the quiet filter. And it’s already here. AI won’t make the thoughtful obsolete. It will make the passive extinct. Every answer AI gives is available to eight billion people. The question you asked to get there isn’t. That’s the last edge a human being has. And almost nobody is protecting it.

Jensen Huang doesn’t use AI the way you think he does. Huang: “90% of my instructions are actually conflated with questions.” The man behind a three trillion dollar company doesn’t give AI commands. He interrogates it. Huang: “I take the answer from one AI, give it to the other AI, ask them to critique itself.” He doesn’t trust the machine. He cross-examines it. Same question. Multiple models. Force them to argue. Then take whatever survives. The way you’d get three opinions before letting a surgeon cut you open. That is not how people use AI. They type a question. Copy the answer. Move on. They think speed is the advantage. It’s not. The advantage is what you do after the machine responds. And almost nobody does anything. AI made answers free. Eight billion people can now get an expert-level response to nearly any question in under ten seconds. Which means the answer is no longer the edge. The question is. And great questions require the one thing no model can replicate. Knowing what you don’t know. Judgment built from years of failure. Pattern recognition earned through reps. The instinct to sense when something sounds right but isn’t. That is a human skill. And it’s atrophying in real time. Because people aren’t using AI to sharpen their thinking. They’re using it to replace their thinking. Huang: “In order to formulate good questions, you have to be thinking, you have to be analytical, you have to be reasoning yourself.” Jensen didn’t say AI makes you smarter. He said you already have to be thinking for AI to work. The tool doesn’t elevate you. Your questions do. The machine just reveals the level you were already operating at. Jensen didn’t build NVIDIA into the most valuable company on earth by out-answering his competitors. He built it by asking questions they never thought to ask. Same market. Same data. Same physics. Different questions. Different empire. That’s the quiet filter. And it’s already here. AI won’t make the thoughtful obsolete. It will make the passive extinct. Every answer AI gives is available to eight billion people. The question you asked to get there isn’t. That’s the last edge a human being has. And almost nobody is protecting it.

Dustin

56,367 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Qullamaggie on Tough Life of a Successful Trader “Being a consistently successful trader is a tough life, man. You gotta put in so much effort to get to that level. Most people just give up. If you want to be a successful trader, you really need to want it. If you think you’re gonna do this on the side, you know make some money and then go do some photography or art the rest of your life, you’re not gonna make it. It needs to be your calling; otherwise, you can just put your money in the index funds and be better off. You need to be a little bit obsessive like you can’t focus on too many other things. It’s the same way with everything. If you want to be top performer in any field, it’s the same thing - that needs to be your main focus. You can’t do anything else. It needs to be your main focus."

Qullamaggie on Tough Life of a Successful Trader “Being a consistently successful trader is a tough life, man. You gotta put in so much effort to get to that level. Most people just give up. If you want to be a successful trader, you really need to want it. If you think you’re gonna do this on the side, you know make some money and then go do some photography or art the rest of your life, you’re not gonna make it. It needs to be your calling; otherwise, you can just put your money in the index funds and be better off. You need to be a little bit obsessive like you can’t focus on too many other things. It’s the same way with everything. If you want to be top performer in any field, it’s the same thing - that needs to be your main focus. You can’t do anything else. It needs to be your main focus."

Lone

30,169 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jordan Peterson just named the one thing no machine will ever possess. Not intelligence. Not logic. Not processing power. A ghost. Peterson reached back to Carl Jung to describe something most people never slow down long enough to feel. You are not just the person sitting here reading this. You are every version of yourself that could ever exist across time. Peterson: “The Self is everything you are and everything you could be across time.” There is a version of you that fulfilled every ounce of potential you carry. The finished version. The one standing at the far end of your life who became everything you were built to become. That version is not a fantasy. It is a gravitational field. And it has been speaking to you your entire life. Not through words. Not through logic. Through the feeling of meaning. Peterson: “The answer is through the instinct of meaning.” When something resonates so deep it stops you mid-step and you cannot explain why. That is not a chemical accident. That is your future self reaching backward through time whispering where to walk next. Peterson: “That which you could be tells you where to walk by making that path meaningful.” Your potential is not quiet. It is dragging you forward every single day through a language older than speech. Now look at what we are building. Machines designed to optimize every human decision. Career paths. Schedules. Relationships. Health. Creativity. The algorithm will map the most efficient route to any destination you name. But it cannot exist across time. It has no unrealized potential. No future version of itself standing at any finish line. No ghost pulling it toward something it was meant to become. It has compute. It does not have a soul whispering directions. When you hand your choices to an algorithm you are not delegating a task. You are muting the only compass that was ever yours. Meaning is not efficient. It is not optimized. It does not care about the shortest path. Meaning requires friction. Confusion. Standing in total darkness and feeling your way forward on nothing but instinct. That is the entire point. The struggle is not the obstacle between you and your potential. The struggle is the conversation between you and your potential. Remove it and you do not arrive faster. You arrive as someone else. We are building the most powerful optimization engine in human history. And we are about to aim it directly at the one process that was never supposed to be optimized. The algorithm will hand you a perfect map. But it will never give you a reason to walk.

Jordan Peterson just named the one thing no machine will ever possess. Not intelligence. Not logic. Not processing power. A ghost. Peterson reached back to Carl Jung to describe something most people never slow down long enough to feel. You are not just the person sitting here reading this. You are every version of yourself that could ever exist across time. Peterson: “The Self is everything you are and everything you could be across time.” There is a version of you that fulfilled every ounce of potential you carry. The finished version. The one standing at the far end of your life who became everything you were built to become. That version is not a fantasy. It is a gravitational field. And it has been speaking to you your entire life. Not through words. Not through logic. Through the feeling of meaning. Peterson: “The answer is through the instinct of meaning.” When something resonates so deep it stops you mid-step and you cannot explain why. That is not a chemical accident. That is your future self reaching backward through time whispering where to walk next. Peterson: “That which you could be tells you where to walk by making that path meaningful.” Your potential is not quiet. It is dragging you forward every single day through a language older than speech. Now look at what we are building. Machines designed to optimize every human decision. Career paths. Schedules. Relationships. Health. Creativity. The algorithm will map the most efficient route to any destination you name. But it cannot exist across time. It has no unrealized potential. No future version of itself standing at any finish line. No ghost pulling it toward something it was meant to become. It has compute. It does not have a soul whispering directions. When you hand your choices to an algorithm you are not delegating a task. You are muting the only compass that was ever yours. Meaning is not efficient. It is not optimized. It does not care about the shortest path. Meaning requires friction. Confusion. Standing in total darkness and feeling your way forward on nothing but instinct. That is the entire point. The struggle is not the obstacle between you and your potential. The struggle is the conversation between you and your potential. Remove it and you do not arrive faster. You arrive as someone else. We are building the most powerful optimization engine in human history. And we are about to aim it directly at the one process that was never supposed to be optimized. The algorithm will hand you a perfect map. But it will never give you a reason to walk.

Dustin

40,730 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten