正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Bird SQL is an impressive new tool, based on language models, for searching Twitter. Tools like this are changing the way we interact with information. If used in the right way, signals are becoming easier to find through the use of LLMs. Try it here:

95,849 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Mike Ma (AI x Finance) 的头像
Mike Ma (AI x Finance)3 年前

@perplexity_ai cc @pinchedio

Heewon Jeon 的头像
Heewon Jeon3 年前

@memdotai mem it!

Mem 的头像
Mem3 年前

@omarsar0 Saved! Here's the compiled thread: 🪄 AI-generated summary: "Bird SQL is a new tool that allows users to search Twitter using language models. This tool can be used to find signals more easily through the use of LLMs."

Phuc Nguyen 的头像
Phuc Nguyen3 年前

@SaveToNotion

john klacynski 的头像
john klacynski3 年前

@AravSrinivas Interesting . I don’t get great results , unless I’m using a bad prompt

Farhan Ahmad 的头像
Farhan Ahmad3 年前

Doesn't show tweets any more. It shows me a paragraph on language models along with citations.

Bhavithiran 的头像
Bhavithiran3 年前

@SaveToNotion

Kishan.B 的头像
Kishan.B3 年前

@elonmusk Check this out

Exa Lovel 的头像
Exa Lovel3 年前

dude, this is impressive

Greenapps&web 的头像
Greenapps&web3 年前

@SaveToNotion #tweet #twitter

相关视频

A 4-year-old child has seen 50x more information than the biggest LLMs. Yann LeCun is the Chief AI Scientist at Meta. He recently spoke on “The Expanding Universe of Generative Models” panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos. Yann highlighted the idea that a 4-year-old child is way smarter than current cutting-edge large language models (LLMs). “Think about what a child sees through vision. Put a number on how much information a 4-year-old child has seen during their life. It’s 20 Mbps going through the optical nerve for 16,000 wake hours in the first 4 years of life. 3,600 seconds per hour is 10^15 bytes. This is 50x more information than the biggest LLMs we have. A 4-year-old child is way smarter than these models having acquired an enormous amount of knowledge about how the world works.” The real constraint right now is the ability of LLMs to think. Today, LLMs are only capable of System 1 thinking. System 1 vs System 2 thinking was popularised in the book 'Thinking, Fast and Slow' by Daniel Kahneman. System 1 tasks involve quick, instinctive, automatic responses. LLMs struggle with discontinuous tasks that require a creative leap in progress as they imitate human responses. It's hard to go above human response accuracy if LLMs are only trained on humans. Models are building the track in front of them with each word being generated. What could it mean to give language models System 2 thinking? This remains a future development I'm excited about.

Alex Banks

22,958 次观看 • 2 年前